Article | Open | Published:

# Characterization of nitrogen deposition in a megalopolis by means of atmospheric biomonitors

## Abstract

An increase of nitrogen deposition resulting from human activities is not only a major threat for global biodiversity, but also for human health, especially in highly populated regions. It is thus important and in some instances legally mandated to monitor reactive nitrogen species in the atmosphere. The utilization of widely distributed biological species suitable for biomonitoring may be a good alternative. We assessed the suitability of an ensemble of atmospheric biomonitors of nitrogen deposition by means of an extensive sampling of a lichen, two mosses, and a bromeliad throughout the Valley of Mexico, whose population reaches 30 million, and subsequent measurements of nitrogen metabolism parameters. In all cases we found significant responses of nitrogen content, C:N ratio and the δ15N to season and site. In turn, the δ15N for the mosses responded linearly to the wet deposition. Also, the nitrogen content (R2 = 0.7), the C:N ratio (R2 = 0.6), and δ15N (R2 = 0.5) for the bromeliad had a linear response to NOx. However, the bromeliad was not found in sites with NOx concentrations exceeding 80 ppb, apparently of as a consequence of excess nitrogen. These biomonitors can be utilized in tandem to determine the status of atmospheric nitrogenous pollution in regions without monitoring networks for avoiding health problems for ecosystems and humans.

## Introduction

Nitrogen deposition is one the most predominant forms of atmospheric pollution1. This phenomenon results from the release of nitrogenous compounds to the atmosphere, both in cities, and in the country, including oxidized (NOx) and reduced (NHx) species, which are highly reactive. Nitrogen deposition causes acidification and eutrophication of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, contributes to the proliferation of invasive species leading to changes in ecosystem structure; it is thus an important factor for climate change1,2,3,4,5,6. Nitrogenous pollution is also an issue for human health worldwide. Indeed, in traffic-jammed motorways, high accumulations of NOx at ground level are harmful by direct inhalation7. NOx emissions also contribute to the formation of secondary compounds including tropospheric ozone and particulate matter which are responsible in part for 9 million annual deaths worldwide8. For the case of Mexico City (Fig. 1), with more than 20 million habitants, at least 9600 deaths can be attributed annually to atmospheric pollution, resulting from respiratory and heart diseases, as well as pollutant build up in the nervous system and the brain9,10. In turn, ammonia emissions from agricultural sources quickly react with other atmospheric pollutants to form airbone particulate matter that can be readily inhaled7. Yet nitrogen is mostly neglected in public policy despite its importance in the prevalent discourse of global environmental change.

While monitoring nitrogenous pollution is an important issue, the deployment of air quality monitoring networks can be cost prohibitive in regions with developing economies. To fill this gap, an affordable alternative is the use of biomonitors11. For instance, throughfall deposition has been determined by the nitrogen content of lichen thalli12. Mosses are also widely used as biomonitors that allow covering vast areas, given that their nitrogen content reflects the rates of deposition and their isotopic composition can reflect the possible sources of pollution13,14. A group of special promise for biomonitoring in the neo-tropical region are atmospheric bromeliads, whose succulent tissues allow for yearlong physiologically activity, taking up pollution regardless of the seasonal environmental conditions. This is the case for the genus Tillandsia, amply distributed in the Americas, which has been utilized for monitoring NOx pollution given that its nutrition depends exclusively from atmospheric sources15,16. However, physiological limitations of these atmospheric organisms can confuse the observed deposition, therefore it has been proposed that an ensemble of various biomonitors for tracking this type of atmospheric pollution improves biomonitoring11.

To assess whether the combined use of various biomonitors can provide reliable information on nitrogen deposition we: (1) determined the spatial distribution of nitrogen content and the isotopic composition for the lichen Anaptychia sp., the mosses Grimmia sp., and Fabronia sp., and the bromeliad Tillandsia recurvata throughout the Valley of Mexico; and (2) evaluated the suitability as biomonitors of these organisms by comparing their nitrogen with an existing automated atmospheric monitoring network.

## Results

### Spatial distribution of nitrogen deposition

The total wet deposition in Mexico City increased from east to west, it ranged from 23 to 45 kg ha−1 year−1 during 2013, and between 24 and 50 kg ha−1 year−1 during 2014 (Fig. 2a). We found the highest rates of wet deposition in northwestern Mexico City. The rest of the valley lacks monitoring stations. The only existing record is from a natural protected area at the north of the Valley, whose wet deposition is always below 5 kg ha−1 year−117. For NOx concentrations, the northern part of Mexico City is the zone with the highest concentrations reaching 78.8 ppb during the dry season and 40.6 ppb during the rainy season (Fig. 2b). The lowest concentrations of NOx were found in the south and the east part of Mexico City which reached 21.8 ppb and 9.2 ppb during dry and rainy season respectively (Fig. 2b).

### Nitrogen relations of biomonitors

#### Anaptychia sp

The nitrogen content of Anaptychia sp. ranged from 1.4% (dry mass) in a natural protected area at the north of the Valley to 5.0% in an urban site in Mexico City during the dry season (Fig. 3a). We observed the same pattern during the rainy season, in which the nitrogen content ranged from 1.3 to 4.6%. The interaction between site and season was significant for all parameters measured (Table 1). A notable finding was that the highest nitrogen deposition of 50 kg N ha−1 year−1 did not produce the highest nitrogen content in this lichen, which was observed in a site whose nitrogen deposition reached 31.5 kg N ha−1 year−1.

The C:N ratio ranged from 7.5 to 39.1, increasing from the urban to the rural sites during the dry season; it ranged from 9.4 to 34.1 during the rainy season. Similarly, the δ15N values ranged between −9.4 and 5.2‰, being more positive in northeastern and downtown Mexico City and in southeastern Pachuca, contrasting with negative values from rural areas (Fig. 3b). A linear regression showed no direct relationship between nitrogen deposition and the parameters measured for this lichen (R2 = 0.14 for nitrogen content, R2 = 0.07 for the C:N ratio and R2 = 0.16 for the δ15N).

#### Grimmia sp

We found significant differences between the nitrogen content of mosses from a natural protected area at the north of the valley that reached 1.3% where the deposition was 5.0 Kg N ha−1 year−1, with those of a site at the north of Mexico City of 3.8% where the deposition reached 40 Kg N ha−1 year−1 (Fig. 3c). We observed no differences in the nitrogen between for the dry and rainy season (Table 1). A linear regression showed that the atmospheric concentration of NOx had no effect on the nitrogen content (R2 < 0.01). The C:N ratio was higher in rural areas and decreased significantly in the urban ones, it ranged between 9.5 and 33.6. On the contrary, NOx concentration had no effect on the C:N (R2 < 0.01).

We found the most negative δ15N value of −7.0‰ in a rural area and the most positive one of 6.6‰ in an urban site where the wet deposition was lower than 35 Kg N ha−1 year−1, exceeding this point δ15N became negative reaching −5.3‰, as occurs with mosses growing at 40 Kg N ha−1 year−1 (Figs. 3d; 4). We also observed positive values in the city of Pachuca at the north of the Valley. Season and NOx concentration showed no effect on the δ15N of this moss (Table 1).

#### Fabronia sp

The nitrogen content ranged between 1.7 and 3.4% (dry weight) across the Valley. We found no differences between the seasons, but significant differences between the rural areas and some sites in Mexico City (Table 1; Fig. 3e). Wet deposition had no effect on the nitrogen content for the mosses from Mexico City. For example, it only increased by 0.3% when nitrogen deposition when from 24.1 to 48.3 Kg N ha−1 year−1. The site and the season were significant (Table 1). The NOx concentration had no effect on the nitrogen content of this moss. In addition, neither the wet deposition, nor the NOx concentration resulted in alterations on C:N ratio, which ranged from 9.0 and 29.5.

The δ15N ranged from −6.6 to 7.8‰. We found the most negative value in a semi-rural site at the north of the Mexico City (Fig. 3f), while a δ15N of −6.0 ± 0.2‰ was observed at the south, where the deposition reached 37.6 Kg N ha−1 year−1. The most positive value was found in the eastern border of Mexico City, where the nitrogen deposition was 33.7 and 27.1 Kg N ha−1 year−1 during 2013 and 2014 respectively. The urban environment in the city of Pachuca also had a considerable effect on the isotopic composition of this moss, as positive values were the rule. Significant differences were found between rural areas and the urban ones. In contrast, the season showed no effect on the isotopic composition of this moss (Table 1). We found a weak relationship between the rate of nitrogen deposition and the δ15N values (R2 = 0.2; Fig. 5).

#### Tillandsia recurvata

The nitrogen content for Tillandsia recurvata ranged from 0.8 to 3.6% during the dry season and from 1.0 to 2.2% (dry weight) during wet season (Fig. 3g). The highest content was observed in the northern part of Mexico City and was significantly different from the lowest value found in a semirural site in the central part of the Valley. At the same time, bromeliads collected in the city of Pachuca had a similar nitrogen content as those from semirural areas of the Valley (Fig. 3g). However, this variation was not due to wet deposition. Instead, it responded positively to the NOx concentration (Fig. 6a). For example, the nitrogen content reached 3.6% in an urban site where the NOx reached 57.4 ppb, contrasting with the lowest nitrogen content that reached 0.8% in a rural site where the NOx concentration presumably was lower than 5 ppb, based on the lowest recorded concentration in Mexico City. Wet deposition had no effect on the C:N ratio of this bromeliad, but it was strongly affected by the concentration of NOx during both seasons (Fig. 6b). For example, we found the lowest C:N ratio of 15.9 where the NOx reached 50.3 ppb, and the highest C:N of 40 where the NOx concentrations were likely lower than 5 ppb. The δ15N values for T. recurvata were negative in rural areas and became positive in the cities, varying from −5.0 to 4.4‰ during the dry season and −7.7 to 5.1‰ during the wet season (Fig. 3h). The δ15N values responded positively to the NOx concentration (R2 = 0.49; Fig. 6c), while the wet deposition had no effect on δ15N values (R2 = 0.01). The data from two sites (Fig. 6c open circles) were excluded from the analysis because topographic and exposure to pollutants were non-representative, clearly skewing the isotopic signature. In particular, one of the sites is a zoological park with large mammals that is crossed by a stream that was visibly polluted. The second site was a small ravine with dense vegetation, where the diffusion of NOx was probably reduced and where biogenic emissions were negative.

## Discussion

The distribution of nitrogenous pollution and deposition in Mexico City generally matched that of the sources of emission. For instance, the highest values were measured in the northern part of the city, where the majority of the manufacturing industries are located along numerous important and busy motorways18. Indeed, motor vehicles, followed by industrial emissions, are the most important source of NOx in México City, whose concentration is directly measured by the city government from the air18,19. In addition, nitrogenous emissions from the agricultural zone between Mexico City and Pachuca substantially contribute to the observed pattern, given predominant north-to-south winds18. In this case, NHx originated from both agricultural and industrial activities are measured from wet deposition.

The nitrogen content of lichens has been utilized as an effective indicator of nitrogen deposition. For example, three species of lichens can record nitrogen inputs of wet deposition below 10 Kg N ha−1 year−1, point at which they saturate12,20. We observed a threshold of nitrogen tolerance for lichens from the Valley, when the deposition reached 31.5 kg N ha−1 year−1 above which they could not take up additional nitrogen. We observed a similar pattern for the δ15N. While the negative values from rural areas were the result of low rates of deposition, high rates of deposition in urban areas resulted in positive isotopic values. However, above a threshold of saturation the isotopic values turned negative, as has been already observed in other species of lichen21. Their isotopic composition responded more to wet than to dry deposition as was observed for mosses. Additionally, different studies show a point of saturation when studying throughfall deposition20,21.

The nitrogen content of moss tissues is affected by the rate of deposition and responds to the distance to urban centers14,22,23,24. We also observed an important influence of urban centers for the nitrogen content of mosses from the Valley. Their δ15N values are affected by the rates of deposition and the prevalent pollutant (e.g. wet NH4+ or NO3; dry NHx or NOx,), being more commonly negative in mosses from rural areas25,26,27,28. The observed negative δ15N for mosses from rural areas resulted from uptake of NH4+ derived from fertilizers and livestock emissions which have characteristic negative δ15N values27,29,30. Mosses from urban areas of the Valley such as Pachuca, as well as some areas of Mexico City where the wet deposition was below 35 Kg N ha−1 year−1 had positive δ15N, suggesting that they most likely take up NO3 derived from NOx of fossil fuel burning and industrial activities which typically display positive δ15N29. Another possible mechanism influencing the isotopic composition of these mosses is the gas-particle conversion process, in which isotopic enrichment occurs for the aerosol nitrogen resulted, producing positive δ15N31.

Mosses take up NH4+ preferentially over NO3 because less energy is needed in its assimilation32. Additionally, high deposition rates can cause the inhibition of nitrate reductase, reducing NO3 assimilation27,33,34. This occurs to some degree when the deposition reaches 10 Kg N ha−1 year−1, but when it exceeds 30 Kg N ha−1 year−1 the nitrate reductase becomes completely inhibited not only precluding NO3 uptake, but even leading to its loss by leaching27,35,36. Nitrate reductase inhibition also has an important effect on the isotopic composition of mosses because it favors the uptake of NH4+ that typically has negative δ15N values30. In the Valley of Mexico, moss δ15N became negative when the rates of wet deposition exceeded 35 Kg N ha−1 year−1, which suggests that nitrate reductase was indeed inhibited, allowing NH4+ uptake, a pollutant that represented 35% of the total wet deposition in Mexico City during 201418,36,37. The atmospheric concentration of NOx had no effect on the nitrogen content nor the isotopic composition of either moss considered here because when NH3 is the prevalent nitrogenous pollutant in the atmosphere, the nitrogen content of the mosses can increase more than from wet deposition. However, in Mexico City the prevalent nitrogenous gas pollutant is NOx, suggesting that nitrogen content and the δ15N of the mosses responded more to wet deposition than to gaseous pollutants27,38.

Despite the high rates of wet deposition recorded in Mexico City which exceeded 50 Kg N ha−1 year−1 in some areas, neither the nitrogen content nor the C:N ratio of Tillandsia recurvata were directly affected. This occurs because raindrops cannot be absorbed by the non-absorptive roots of these plants39. Instead, nitrogen was taken up as NOx by the leaves of this bromeliad because it can absorb particles and gasses from the air thanks to stomatal gas exchange and the trichomes present in the surface39. This is evident from the close relationship found here between the nitrogen content and the NOx concentration in the Valley. This is similar to what occurs for other atmospheric bromeliads, whose nitrogen content is higher in the vicinity of highways than further away40,41,42. The seasonal differences found for the nitrogen content appeared to respond to the phenology of this bromeliad which grows after the rainy season. Indeed, the NOx were dragged from the atmosphere to the ground surface during rainy season reducing its biological availability18,43.

Both the nitrogen content and the isotopic composition of T. recurvata were determined by the predominant anthropic activity of the sites where the plant was collected. Bromeliads take up NOx with positive δ15N from industrialized and densely populated areas, contrasting with the negative emissions originated from biogenic sources, such as the soil and livestock waste44,45. The positive δ15N found for T. recurvata suggests no nitrate reductase inhibition, but it is likely that NOx concentrations higher than 80 ppb may result in some inhibition of this enzyme. This could be one of the reasons why T. recurvata was not found in sites with concentrations of NOx higher than 80 ppb.

The distinct responses observed for each biomonitor evaluated here are a result of the ecophysiological traits of each functional type. Indeed, the lack of a cuticle and a vascular system for mosses, allows a rapid/ready assimilation of incoming pollution, mainly from wet deposition. However, their weak response to NOx levels could be an effect of plant phenology, as the mosses remain dormant during the dry season, so the uptake of the gas is not physiologically possible. For the case of the tillandsia, the fact that it is adapted to a water and nutrient-limiting environment was the cause for its suitability for monitoring NOx, as all its nutrition is atmospheric and their water is intercepted from the atmosphere46. In addition, their potential uptake of wet deposition is inherently limited by their small area to volume ratio that in turn reduces water loss47. Also, their rates for taking up water are low, so exposure to more benign environments does not lead to increased water uptake as we have found experimentally48.

Of course, caution must be taken when implementing a biomonitoring method utilizing spontaneously occurring plants, as their nitrogen parameters can also respond to various factors other than nitrogenous pollution. For instance, if dewfall is substantial during the dry season, mosses can remain physiologically active, and thus be able to assimilate NOx. Also, water availability and extreme temperatures can have an effect on the N relations of plants. For instance, high daytime temperatures and a very low relative humidity during the dry season or a very cloudy sky during the rainy season can both lead to stomatal closure during the night for the CAM bromeliads. In either case, uptake of NOx will not occur. Other factors to consider are pathogens and herbivores49. For these reasons, specific biomonitors need to be developed for each region of interest, taking in consideration the particular environmental conditions and the ecophysiological traits of potential biomonitors11.

For the case of the Mexico valley, and by possible extension to the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, T. recurvata can be utilized for monitoring NOx along with a moss that records wet deposition. This approach can become a useful tool for determining the status of nitrogenous pollution in regions where air quality monitoring networks are not available. Especially in mid-sized cities and surrounding areas where the saturation thresholds of these organisms has not been reached. Finally, the utilization in tandem of these organisms can inform an early alert for avoiding health problems for both ecosystems and humans.

## Methods

### Study area

The Valley of Mexico is located in central Mexico spanning 7500 km2, with an average elevation of 2240 m50. Annual precipitation ranges from 600 mm at the center of the valley to 1300 mm in the surrounding mountains. The predominant winds blow from the northeast and northwest51. Mexico City sits at the southern edge of the Valley with a population of 20 million. At the northern edge, Pachuca, the capital of the state of Hidalgo, has a population of 3 million. Additional, settlements interspersed in the valley with industrial or agricultural activities comprise the rest of the 30 million inhabitants of this basin10.

### Nitrogen environment

The Mexico City environmental authority has deployed an air quality network of 16 monitoring stations for wet deposition (Fig. 1). This network collects data during the rainy season from May to November. The nitrogen collected consists of dissolved NO3 and NH4+, so that the total nitrogen is the sum of both forms of deposition (NO3 + NH4+). This dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) is biologically available27. For this study, the rates of wet deposition measured by this monitoring network during 2014 were utilized for the analyses described below. This air quality network also has 27 monitoring stations for measuring the atmospheric NOx concentration (NO + NO2) year-round, 24 hours a day. We utilized the mean seasonal concentration in ppb during dry season (November 2013 to April 2014) and during the rainy season (from May 2014 to October 2014). Data were obtained from the website of the environmental authority of the Mexico City (http://www.aire.cdmx.gob.mx/default.php).

### Biomonitoring

We selected four species of three types of atmospheric organisms, the lichen Anaptychia sp., the mosses Grimmia sp. and Fabronia sp., and the bromeliad Tillandsia recurvata (L). These organisms have been utilized as monitors of nitrogen deposition and are abundant in the Valley of Mexico14,15,21. We collected tissue samples from 5 individuals of each species growing on different substrates from 36 sites throughout the valley, including urban parks, agricultural sites, and natural protected areas, for the dry season on (8–20 May) and, the wet season 3–15 November of 2014. The distribution of the sites within the basin was determined by the occurrence of the biomonitoring species and by the complex nature of the landscape, which precluded the collection of samples from a regular grid52.

The tissue samples were dried at 60 °C in a gravity convection oven until reaching constant weight. The dried tissues were ground to a fine powder in a ball mill (Retsch MM300; Retsch, Vienna, Austria), wrapped into tin capsules (Costech Analytical, Inc. Valencia, California, USA), and weighed with a microbalance (0.01 mg, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). For each sample, both the nitrogen content and their isotopic signature were determined at the Stable Isotope Facility, University of Wyoming (Laramie, Wyoming, USA), with a Carlo Erba EA 1110 elemental analyzer (Costech Analytical Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) attached to a continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Finnigan Delta Plus XP, Thermo Electron Corp, Waltham, MA). Nitrogen isotope ratios, reported in parts per thousand, were calculated relative to atmospheric air standards.

The analytical precision for the δ15N was 0.3 ± 0.07‰ (SD). The natural abundances of 15N were calculated as:

$${{\rm{\delta }}}^{{\rm{15}}}{\rm{N}}({{\rm{\textperthousand }}}_{{\rm{versus}}{\rm{air}}})=({{\rm{R}}}_{{\rm{sample}}}\,{/R}_{{\rm{standard}}}-{\rm{1}})\times {\rm{1000}}$$

where, R is the ratio of 15N/14N for nitrogen isotope abundance for a given sample53,54.

### Statistical analyses

We utilized linear regressions to determine the relationship between total wet nitrogen deposition and the nitrogen content (% dry weight), the C:N ratio as well as the δ15N of the organisms considered. The same was done for the concentration of atmospheric NOx. Data accomplished normality in both cases30. We performed two way ANOVAs (factors were site and season) followed by a post hoc Holm–Sidak tests (p ≤ 0.05) to determine differences in the nitrogen content (% dry weight), the C:N ratio, as well as the δ15N values of the tissue samples. All statistical analyses were conducted with Sigmaplot 12 (Systat Software Inc. USA).

### Geostatistical analyses

We utilized the ordinary Kriging method (a geostatistical gridding tool for irregularly spaced data55) to determine the rates of wet deposition, and the concentration of NOx in the sites where no monitoring station was available for the area covered by the monitoring network. Likewise, we modelled the geographical distribution of the nitrogen content, C:N ratio, and the δ15N values for the biomonitors, as well as the data from the monitoring network with ArcGIS 10 (Esri, Redlands, California, USA).

## Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Galloway, J. N. et al. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry. 70, 153–226 (2004).

2. 2.

Sala, O. E. et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science. 287, 1770–1774 (2000).

3. 3.

Phoenix, G. K. et al. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in world biodiversity hotspots: the need for a greater global perspective in assessing N deposition impacts. Glob. Chang. Biol. 12, 470–476 (2006).

4. 4.

Duprè, C. et al. Changes in species richness and composition in European acidic grasslands over the past 70 years: the contribution of cumulative atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Glob Chang Biol. 16, 344–357 (2010).

5. 5.

Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Venterink, H. O. & Buschmann, H. Nitrogen enrichment and plant invasions: the importance of nitrogen-fixing plants and anthropogenic eutrophication. Biological invasions (ed. Netwig, W.). 163–180 (Springer 2007).

6. 6.

Silva, L. C. R., Gómez-Guerrero, A., Doane, T. A. & Horwath, W. R. Isotopic and nutritional evidence for species and site-specific responses to N deposition and elevated CO2 in temperate forests. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 1110–1123 (2015).

7. 7.

Reay, D. Nitrogen and Climate Change: An Explosive Story. (Palgrave Macmillan 2015).

8. 8.

Landrigan, P. J. et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 391, 462–512 (2018).

9. 9.

Stevens., G. et al. Characterizing the epidemiological transition in Mexico: national and subnational burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. PLoS Medicine 5, e125 (2018).

10. 10.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. 2011. Censo de población y vivienda 2010. http://web.archive.org/web/20120505010044/http://www.censo2010. org.mx/doc/cpv10p_pres.pdf (2011).

11. 11.

Díaz-Álvarez, E. A., Lindig-Cisneros, R. & de la Barrera, E. Biomonitors of atmospheric nitrogen deposition: potential uses and limitations. Conserv. Physiol. Conserv 6, coy011 (2018).

12. 12.

Root, H. T., Geiser, L. H. & Fenn, M. E. A simple tool for estimating throughfall nitrogen deposition in forests of western North America using lichens. For. Ecol. Manage. 306, 1–8 (2013).

13. 13.

Pitcairn, C. E. R. et al. Foliar nitrogen as an indicator of nitrogen deposition and critical L¡loads exceedance on a European Scale. Water Air Soil Pollut. 130, 1037–1042 (2001).

14. 14.

Harmens, H. et al. Nitrogen concentrations in mosses indicate the spatial distribution of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in Europe. Environ. pollut. 159, 2852–60 (2011).

15. 15.

Zambrano García, A. et al. Distribution and sources of bioaccumulative air pollutants at Mezquital Valley, Mexico, as reflected by the atmospheric plant Tillandsia recurvata L. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 6479–6494 (2009).

16. 16.

Felix, J. D., Avery, G. B., Mead, R. N., Kieber, R. J. & Willey, J. D. Nitrogen content and isotopic composition of Spanish moss (Tillandsia usneoides L.): Reactive Nitrogen Variations and Source Implications Across an Urban Coastal Air Shed. Environ. Process. 3, 711–722 (2006).

17. 17.

Arciga, P. A. Evaluación del potencial bioindicador de la depositación de nitrógeno de dos musgos comunes en México. (PS thesis). Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. (2010).

18. 18.

Secretaría del Medio Ambiente del Gobierno del Distrito Federal. Calidad del aire en la Ciudad de México 2014, 120 pp. Dirección general de gestión de la calidad del aire, Dirección de monitoreo atmosférico. (2015).

19. 19.

Castro, T. et al. Water-soluble inorganic ions of size-differentiated atmospheric particles from a suburban site of Mexico City. J. Atmos Chem, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-017-9369-5 (2017).

20. 20.

McMurray, J. A., Roberts, D. W., Fenn, M. E., Geiser, L. H. & Jovan, S. Using epiphytic lichens to monitor nitrogen deposition near natural gas drilling operations in the wind river range, WY, USA. Water Air Soil Pollut. 224, 1487 (2013).

21. 21.

Jovan, S., Riddell, J., Padgett, P. E. & Nash III, T. H. Eutrophic lichens respond to multiple forms of N: implications for critical levels and critical loads research. Ecol Appl. 22, 1910–1922 (2012).

22. 22.

Zechmeister, H. G. et al. Total Nitrogen Content and δ15N Signatures in Moss Tissue: Indicative Value for Nitrogen Deposition Patterns and Source Allocation on a Nationwide Scale. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 8661–8667 (2008).

23. 23.

Liu., X.-Y., Xiao, H.-Y., Liu, C.-Q., Li, Y.-Y. & Xiao, H.-W. Atmospheric transport of urban-derived NH(x): Evidence from nitrogen concentration and 15N in epilithic mosses at Guiyang, SW China. Environ. Pollut. 156, 715–22 (2008).

24. 24.

Liu, X.-Y., Xiao, H.-Y., Liu, C.-Q., Li, Y.-Y. & Xiao, H.-W. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes of the moss Haplocladium microphyllum in an urban and a background area (SW China): The role of environmental conditions and atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Atmos. Environ. 42, 5413–5423 (2008).

25. 25.

Stewart, G., Aidar, M., Joly, C. & Schmidt, S. Impact of point source pollution on nitrogen isotope signatures (δ15N) of vegetation in SE Brazil. Oecologia. 131, 468–472 (2002).

26. 26.

Xiao, H. Y., Tang, C. G., Xiao, H. W., Liu, X. Y. & Liu, C. Q. Mosses indicating atmospheric nitrogen deposition and sources in the Yangtze River drainage basin, China. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D14301 (2010).

27. 27.

Liu, X.-Y., Koba, K., Liu, C.-Q., Li, X.-D. & Yoh, M. Pitfalls and new mechanisms in moss isotope biomonitoring of atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Environ. Sci. technol. 46, 12557–66 (2012).

28. 28.

Schröder, W. et al. Mapping correlations between nitrogen concentrations in atmospheric deposition and mosses for natural landscapes in Europe. Ecol. Indic. 36, 563–571 (2014).

29. 29.

Felix, J. D. & Elliott, E. M. Isotopic composition of passively collected nitrogen dioxide emissions: Vehicle, soil and livestock source signatures. Atmos. Environ. 92, 359–366 (2014).

30. 30.

Skudnik, M., Jeran, Z., Batič, F., Simončič, P. & Kastelec, D. Potential environmental factors that influence the nitrogen concentration and δ15N values in the moss Hypnum cupressiforme collected inside and outside canopy drip lines. Environ. Pollut. 198, 78–85 (2015).

31. 31.

Pavuluri, C. M., Kawamura, K., Tachibana, E. & Swaminathan, T. Elevated nitrogen isotope ratios of tropical Indian aerosols from Chennai: Implication for the origins of aerosol nitrogen in South and Southeast Asia. Atmos. Environ. 44, 3597–3604 (2010).

32. 32.

Heldt, H. W. & Piechulla, B. Plant Biochemistry, Fourth edition. (Academic Press 2011).

33. 33.

Paulissen, M. P. C. P., Van Der Ven, P. J. M., Dees, A. J. & Bobbink, R. Differential effects of nitrate and ammonium on three fen bryophyte species in relation to pollutant nitrogen input. New Phytol. 164, 451–458 (2004).

34. 34.

Liu, X.-Y. et al. Ammonium first: natural mosses prefer atmospheric ammonium but vary utilization of dissolved organic nitrogen depending on habitat and nitrogen deposition. New phytol. 199, 407–19 (2013).

35. 35.

Gordon, C., Wynn, J. M. & Woodin, S. J. Impacts of increased nitrogen supply on high Arctic heath: the importance of bryophytes and phosphorus availability. New Phytol. 149, 461–471 (2002).

36. 36.

Pitcairn, C. et al. Diagnostic indicators of elevated nitrogen deposition. Environ. Pollut. 144, 941–50 (2006).

37. 37.

Wiedermann, M. M., Gunnarsson, U., Ericson, L. & Nordin, A. Ecophysiological adjustment of two Sphagnum species in response to anthropogenic nitrogen deposition. New Phytol. 181, 208–217 (2009).

38. 38.

Redling, K., Elliott, E., Bain, D. & Sherwell, J. Highway contributions to reactive nitrogen deposition: tracing the fate of vehicular NOx using stable isotopes and plant biomonitors. Biogeochemistry. 116, 261–274 (2013).

39. 39.

Schmitt, D.-B. A. K., Martin, C. E. & Lüttge, U. E. Gas exchange and water vapor uptake in the atmospheric CAM bromeliad Tillandsia recurvata L.: the influence of trichomes. Plant Biol. 102, 80–84 (1989).

40. 40.

Figuereido, A. M. G., Alcalá, A. L. & Ticianelli, R. B. The use of Tillandsia usneoides L. as bioindicator of air pollution in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 259, 59–63 (2004).

41. 41.

Abril, A. B. & Bucher, E. H. A comparison of nutrient sources of the epiphyte Tillandsia capillaris attached to trees and cables in Cordoba, Argentina. J. Arid Environ. 73, 393–395 (2009).

42. 42.

Santos, J. J. et al. Modelagem da dispersão de poluentes de origem móvel (veicular) em curitiba e a ocorrência de bromélias em cabos da rede elétrica. Blucher Engineering Proceedings 1, 189–204 (2014).

43. 43.

Taiz, L. & Zeiger, E. Plant Physiology, Fifth edition. (Sinauer Associates 2010).

44. 44.

Felix, J. D. et al. Examining the transport of ammonia emissions across landscapes using nitrogen isotope ratios. Atmos. Environ. 95, 563–570 (2014).

45. 45.

Díaz-Álvarez, E. A., Reyes-García, C. & de la Barrera, E. A δ15N assessment of nitrogen deposition for the endangered epiphytic orchid Laelia speciosa from a city and an oak forest in Mexico. J. Plant Res. 129, 863–872 (2016).

46. 46.

Guevara-Escobar, A. M. et al. Fog interception by Ball moss (Tillandsia recurvata). Hydrol. Earth. Syst. Sci. 15, 2509–2518 (2011).

47. 47.

Park, N. Physicochemical and environmental plant physiology, fourth edition. (Academic Press 2009).

48. 48.

Barrios-Hernández, E. Y. Organismos potenciales para estudios de bioindicación de la depositación de nitrógeno en México. (PS thesis). Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. (2010).

49. 49.

Maron, J. L. & Crone, E. Herbivory: effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273, 2575–2584 (2006).

50. 50.

Calderón, R. G. & Rzedowski, J. Flora fanerogamica del Valle de México. (Instituto de Ecologia y CONABIO, Xalapa, Veracruz, México 2001).

51. 51.

52. 52.

Wang, W. & Pataki, D. E. Spatial patterns of plant isotope tracers in the Los Angeles urban region. Landsc. Ecol. 25, 35–52 (2010).

53. 53.

Ehleringer, J. R. & Osmond, B. O. Stable isotopes. Plant Physiological Ecology. (eds Pearcy, R. W., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A. & Rundel, P. W.) 281–300 (Chapman & Hall 1989).

54. 54.

Evans, R. Physiological mechanisms influencing plant nitrogen isotope composition. Trends Plant Sci. 6, 121–126 (2001).

55. 55.

Cressie, N. Spatial prediction and ordinary Kriging. Math. Geol 20, 405–421 (1988).

## Acknowledgements

We thank funding by the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (PAPIIT IN205616) and institutional funds of the Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. E.A.D.A. held a generous graduate research fellowship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, México. We also thank Mr. F.S. Zúñiga for his hospitality in Mexico City and the generousity of the personnel of Zona Arqueológica de Teotihuacán, especially to Ms. V. Ortega.

## Author information

### Affiliations

1. #### Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico

• Edison A. Díaz-Álvarez
2. #### Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, 58190, Michoacán, Mexico

• Edison A. Díaz-Álvarez
•  & Erick de la Barrera

### Contributions

Both authors planned the study, conducted field work, took part in the preparation of the manuscript, have reviewed the results, and have approved the final version of this manuscript. E.A.D.A. analyzed the data, prepared all of the figures, and wrote the initial version of the manuscript. E.d.l.B. procured funding, revised and approved the manuscript, and drove in the field and planned a gastronomic tour in the Valley of Mexico.

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erick de la Barrera.