Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ultrastructure and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Deuterated Switchgrass

Abstract

Neutron scattering of deuterated plants can provide fundamental insight into the structure of lignocellulosics in plant cell walls and its deconstruction by pretreatment and enzymes. Such plants need to be characterized for any alterations to lignocellulosic structure caused by growth in deuterated media. Here we show that glucose yields from enzymatic hydrolysis at lower enzyme loading were 35% and 30% for untreated deuterated and protiated switchgrass, respectively. Lignin content was 4% higher in deuterated switchgrass but there were no significant lignin structural differences. Transmission electron microscopy showed differences in lignin distribution and packing of fibers in the cell walls that apparently increased surface area of cellulose in deuterated switchgrass, increasing cellulose accessibility and lowering its recalcitrance. These differences in lignification were likely caused by abiotic stress due to growth in deuterated media.

Introduction

Structural components of plants, mainly cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, are enormous carbon resources that can be utilized for production of renewable fuels, chemicals, and materials. The complex structure of lignocellulosics that make up plant cell walls needs to be clearly understood for the success of these biorefining technologies1. Neutron scattering allows the study of structural and dynamic properties of lignocellulosic biomass at multiple length scales in a non-destructive manner2. Due to differences in scattering length density of hydrogen and deuterium, isotopic substitution of hydrogen with deuterium permits analysis of individual components in a system such as dynamic visualization of protein-carbohydrate and lignin-cellulose interactions3. Hydroponic cultivation of plants in deuterated media can achieve relatively high levels of deuterium substitution that is highly desired for neutron scattering studies due to the lessening of background scattering4,5. Deuterium substitution in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) was achieved by growing it first in H2O for one to three months followed by transferring hydroponic plants grown from tiller cuttings to a 1:1 solution of D2O:H2O containing Schenk and Hildebrandt’s basal salts4. Approximately 34% deuterium incorporation was calculated from 2H/1H ratio from 2H and 1H NMR spectra of deuterated switchgrass grown in 50% D2O medium4,6. Switchgrass cultivated by this method exhibited gross morphology and growth rates similar to controls grown in H2O4, in contrast to the slower growth and dwarfing observed for winter rye7, annual rye grass8, Arabidopsis9,10, and other species11. Such deuterated plants for fundamental studies need to be investigated for any possible alterations to physical and chemical characteristics due to stress caused by growth in deuterated media.

In this study, deuterated switchgrass with 34% isotopic substitution (grown in 50% D2O medium) and protiated switchgrass (H2O control) were investigated for glucose yields by enzymatic hydrolysis by T. reesei cellulases. It is known that higher binding energy and shorter bond length of deuterium bonds compared to hydrogen bonds result in slower reaction rates, a phenomenon known as the kinetic isotope effect (KIE)3. However, deuterated switchgrass had higher glucose yield from enzymatic hydrolysis than protiated switchgrass. Thus, this study characterized these plants to find the cause of higher glucose yields from enzymatic hydrolysis of deuterated switchgrass and better understand cell wall recalcitrance when plants are subjected to environmental stress.

Findings

KIE was expected to lower enzymatic hydrolysis yields of deuterated switchgrass compared to protiated switchgrass. However, enzymatic hydrolysis of deuterated switchgrass resulted in about 5% higher glucose yield at a loading of 20 FPU cellulase +40 CBU β-glucosidase per g glucan in switchgrass than protiated switchgrass after 72 h of reaction (Fig. 1). At a higher enzyme loading of 40 FPU cellulase +80 CBU β-glucosidase per g glucan in switchgrass, glucose yields were similar (40%) between these two types of switchgrass. To understand why deuterated switchgrass did not show lower yield in enzymatic hydrolysis, switchgrass samples were delignified to recover protiated and deuterated holocellulose (cellulose + hemicellulose). This was followed by protiated and deuterated α-cellulose recovery through alkaline removal of hemicellulose from holocellulose samples. Deuterated holocellulose and α-cellulose isolated from switchgrass had lower enzymatic hydrolysis glucose yields after 72 h of reaction than their protiated counterparts by about 4 and 18 percentage points, respectively, at a loading of 20 FPU (filter paper units) cellulase +40 CBU (cellobiose units) β-glucosidase per gram glucan in switchgrass (Fig. 1). Thus, enzymatic hydrolysis of deuterated holocellulose and cellulose showed the expected kinetic isotope effect. These data indicated that lignin is likely responsible for better or similar glucose yield from deuterated switchgrass than protiated switchgrass through enzymatic hydrolysis. As it took several months to grow these samples by cultivation of a limited number of switchgrass plants in hydroponic chambers, the amount of material available for enzymatic hydrolysis was limited. Additionally, since the tillers were harvested after one to two months growth, moisture content of the never-dried biomass was relatively high, about 80%, as compared to field-grown end-of-season harvested switchgrass. Therefore, only enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass was repeated at the high enzyme loading to confirm the unexpected outcome of similar or higher yield by deuterated switchgrass, as the other samples (holocellulose and α-cellulose) showed the expected kinetic isotope effect. At 40 FPU + 80 CBU enzyme loading, the glucose yields from protiated switchgrass from two biological replicates were 38.76% and 38.80% while that from deuterated switchgrass were 40.35% and 39.01%, confirming the accuracy of the results.

Figure 1
figure1

Glucose yields from enzymatic hydrolysis. Graphs show glucose yields from enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass at (A) 20 FPU cellulase +40 CBU β-glucosidase and (B) 40 FPU cellulase +80 CBU β-glucosidase per gram glucan, and (C) holocellulose and (D) cellulose isolated from switchgrass at an enzyme loading of 20 FPU cellulase +40 CBU β-glucosidase per gram glucan, in their protiated (square) and deuterated (circle) forms, respectively, over 72 h of reaction.

Compositional analysis of switchgrass showed that lignin content was higher for deuterated switchgrass (16.8%) than protiated switchgrass (13.1%) (Fig. 2). This is contrary to the higher glucose yield by deuterated switchgrass as elevated lignin content can negatively affect deconstruction of plant polysaccharides by cellulase enzymes12,13. For example, poplar wood released three times more sugars with enzymatic hydrolysis due to reduced lignin content of the tension wood region14,15. Moreover, glucan and xylan content of deuterated switchgrass were about 9 and 5 percentage points lower than protiated switchgrass. In our recent article, characterization of lignin isolated after enzymatic digestion of these two switchgrass samples was carried out16. Molecular weight analysis showed that deuterated lignin had slightly higher weight-average molecular weights (11109 g/mol) than protiated lignin (9009 g/mol), likely due to the higher atomic weight of deuterium. Considering lignin monomer mol. wt. as 203 g/mol based on S/G ratio of 0.7716 found in the earlier study, degree of polymerization increased roughly from 44 to 54. If equal isotopic substitution in all biomass components is assumed, i.e., 34% deuterium incorporation in lignin, and 10–13 hydrogen atoms per monomer, the expected increase in the mol. wt. of lignin will only be about 82 g/mol in switchgrass grown in 50% D2O. Moreover, C-D and O-D bond lengths are slightly smaller than C-H and O-H17,18, suggesting that size exclusion chromatography may show slightly lower or similar molecular weight of deuterated switchgrass lignin compared to its protiated counterpart. This issue will be investigated in the future by using absolute detection instead of calibration using polystyrene standards to see whether this increase was actually caused by plant biosynthesis.

Figure 2
figure2

Glucan, xylan and lignin composition of protiated and deuterated switchgrass. Lignin content is sum of acid insoluble lignin (solid) and acid soluble lignin (pattern).

Two-dimensional heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) NMR of the deuterated and protiated lignin and 31P NMR analysis of hydroxyl groups in lignin suggested that there were no distinct effects of deuteration on core structure of lignin. Phenolic groups of lignin can affect its hydrophobicity which is an important factor in unproductive binding of enzyme to lignin that leads to less active enzyme available for cellulose saccharification19,20. Similar phenolic hydroxyl content among the two isotopic samples indicated no significant difference in their hydrophobicity that might have affected yields from enzymatic hydrolysis.

Modified Simons’ staining technique was then used to estimate cellulose accessibility in switchgrass. Cellulosic dye Direct Orange 15 was ultra-filtrated to recover a high molecular (HW) weight fraction (>100 KDa). Cellulose accessibility measured from adsorption of this high molecular weight orange dye fraction has been correlated to enzymatic hydrolysis yields, due to similar size of the enzyme and HW of dye fraction21,22. Results showed that dye adsorption based on per g glucan in biomass was significantly higher for deuterated switchgrass than that in protiated switchgrass both before, and after enzymatic hydrolysis at high enzyme loading (Fig. 3). Thus, higher cellulose accessibility was the primary reason for the inverse isotope effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass. Further, bright-field, fluorescence and electron microscopy were carried out to see how lignin may have affected cellulose accessibility. Thin switchgrass transverse sections were stained with Toluidine blue and observed under a light microscope. Toluidine blue stains lignified cell walls blue-green and non-lignified cell walls reddish purple23. Lignification was further studied on a confocal microscope using the auto-fluorescence property of lignin24. Figures 4 and 5 show a typical Kranz anatomy of bundle sheath arrangement and mesophyll cells for C4 photosynthesis in switchgrass25. Deuterated switchgrass had a normal morphology. Bundle sheath, sclerenchyma and xylem cell walls from both types of switchgrass were stained blue and fluoresced under UV light. Both samples showed low lignification of mesophyll and phloem cell walls. Further, distribution of lignin in deuterated and protiated switchgrass cell walls was studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by staining with potassium permanganate (KMnO4) that has a high affinity to lignin compared to polysaccharides in plant cell walls. It oxidizes phenolic groups in lignin and precipitates as manganese dioxide at the reaction site26. This electron-dense stain for TEM was applied as a post-stain on thin sections. Darker regions in TEM images represent higher concentration of MnO2 and thus, higher presence of lignin in plant cell walls. Figures 6 and 7 show that cell walls of deuterated switchgrass had lignin condensed in specific regions forming light and dark patterns compared to the higher uniformity in lignin distribution in protiated switchgrass cell walls. The images of deuterated switchgrass also show somewhat lower packing of lignocellulosic fibers that may have contributed to increase in accessibility. Moreover, KMnO4 strongly stained cytoplasmic material of plant cells. This is the first example of alterations in cell wall lignification of deuterated plants. Nevertheless, some changes to ultrastructure of plants from D2O growth have been reported before. Previous studies that carried out imaging of rye seedlings and duckweed grown in D2O focused on internal cellular structures. TEM images of winter rye seedlings germinated in H2O for 2 days and 99.8% D2O7 for 9 days found differences in chloroplast structure. Growth in 50% or 63% D2O caused disorganization of cellular structure of fronds of Lemna perpusilla duckweed27 TEM images showed disruption of the ultrastructure of the tonoplast and chloroplast membranes of Lemna minor during initial exposure to 50% D2O followed by recovery and adaptation after 24 hours7,27,28.

Figure 3
figure3

Dye adsorption onto cellulose in untreated and enzymatic hydrolysis residues of protiated and deuterated switchgrass.

Figure 4
figure4

Bright-field images of transverse section of protiated (A) and deuterated (B) switchgrass stained with toluidine blue at magnification of 25X. Sc: Sclerenchyma, BS: Bundle Sheath, M: Mesophyll, X: Xylem and Ph: Phloem.

Figure 5
figure5

Confocal microscopy images showing autofluorescence of lignin of transverse section of protiated (A) and deuterated switchgrass (B) at magnification of 25X. Sc: Sclerenchyma, BS: Bundle Sheath, M: Mesophyll, X: Xylem and Ph: Phloem.

Figure 6
figure6

TEM images of transverse sections of protiated (A,C) and deuterated switchgrass (B,D). Images (C,D) show magnified regions for the highlighted regions (A and B) in images (A and B) respectively. Scale bars: (A,B) – 10 µm and (C,D) – 1 µm.

Figure 7
figure7

TEM images of transverse sections of protiated (AC) and deuterated switchgrass (DF) stained with KMnO4. Scale bar: 0.5 µm.

Localization of lignin in specific regions of cell walls left some regions with reduced lignification while others with increased concentration of lignin even when the lignin content of bulk material was elevated. Lower packing of fibers and regions of reduced lignification contributed to higher dye adsorption and hence, higher enzyme accessibility to cellulose that overpowered the kinetic isotope effect. Hemicellulose and lignin in plant cell walls prevent cellulase enzymes from efficiently converting cellulose to cellobiose (β-glucosidase converts cellobiose to glucose) due to low number of substrate binding sites and extensive linkages between these polymers. Moreover, cellulases are inactivated over time of reaction29. At the higher enzyme loading, the excessive amount of active cellulases can remove several glucan chains and create more cellulose substrate binding sites, as evidenced by higher accessibility of the enzymatic hydrolysis residues. However, a plateau is reached in this process as hemicellulose and lignin prevent further breakdown of cellulose. At the lower enzyme loading, while KIE reduced enzymatic conversion, the higher number of accessible substrate sites resulted in higher glucose yields from deuterated switchgrass. However, even at higher enzyme loading, hemicellulose and lignin prevented cellulose conversion beyond ~40%. More cellulose surfaces were rendered accessible in protiated switchgrass over reaction time at higher enzyme loading than at lower enzyme loading, resulting in elevation of its cellulose conversion to a level similar to deuterated switchgrass. Irregular or abnormal lignification has been previously found in plants under environmental stress. It has been suggested that abiotic stresses increase lignification of cell walls30. Stress due to growth in deuterated media likely led to elevation of lignin content and abnormal distribution of lignin. Yang et al.31 found that the genes that had increased expression in Arabidopsis due to growth in D2O were stress related and included oxidative stress, wound, defense, water deprivation and temperature shock genes. Donaldson reported irregular lignification and abnormality in cell walls of drought affected pine trees (Pinus radiata). In these trees, severely reduced lignification was found in collapsed cell walls32. Oxidative stress affects peroxidase activity that can increase lignification of cell walls33. However, physiological and metabolic changes from growth in high D2O concentrations are still not completely understood and we continue to study these phenomena.

These results illustrate that lignification patterns and packing fibers in plant cell walls can reduce recalcitrance of biomass despite higher lignin content. Although much emphasis has been placed on the relationship between the structure of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin in terms of recalcitrance, these results clearly demonstrate that even when these components are comparable, changes in recalcitrance can still occur due to the ultrastructure of the plant cell wall. In the future, these results suggest that we may be able to engineer plants with reduced recalcitrance by altering the location of lignin within the plant cell wall structure while maintaining the same bulk distribution of lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose. Given the interest and future needs for low recalcitrance biomass these results provide a new insight into engineering energy crops.

Methods

Hydroponic Cultivation of Switchgrass

Switchgrass was grown hydroponically from tiller cuttings using an in-house assembled perfusion system as described previously4,5. Switchgrass seeds (Panicum virgatum, Alamo cultivar) were obtained from the Bioenergy Science Center located at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U. S. A. Deuterium oxide (D2O), 99.8%, was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Cambridge, Massachusetts). Distilled water was further purified by filtration through a Barnstead E-Pure water purification system before use. The growth media were prepared with Schenk and Hildebrandt’s basal salts (without sugars, vitamins, or rooting hormones). Plant jars, filter-vented lids, and Schenk and Hildebrandt’s basal salt mixture were purchased from Phytotechnology Laboratories (Shawnee Mission, Kansas, U. S. A.). Switchgrass was grown from seed in commercial potting soil. Tillers were cut from the root crowns of the established switchgrass and incubated in plant jars containing sterile Schenk and Hildebrandt’s basal salts in H2O until appearance of roots after 5–10 days. The rooted tiller cuttings were transferred to growth chambers assembled from 1 L graduated cylinders fitted with rubber closures with inflow and outflow tubes perfused with dry ambient air using an aquarium pump and in-line desiccant tubes as described previously8. After one to eleven months growth, hydroponic plants were transferred to growth medium containing 50% D2O for deuteration, while control plants were maintained in H2O medium. Samples for microscopy were taken from 30–50 cm tall tillers harvested after one to two months growth from the hydroponic plants, with deuterated plants harvested 1 to 6 months after transfer to 50% D2O.

Composition of switchgrass

Switchgrass samples were dried overnight in a fume hood. This was followed by size reduction in a Mini Wiley Mill (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ) through a screen size of ASTM standard mesh no. 40. Samples were extracted with toluene:ethanol (2:1 v/v) in a soxhlet apparatus for 8 h. Composition of glucan, xylan, and lignin in protiated and deuterated switchgrass were determined by standard National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) procedure “Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass”34. Acid soluble lignin was determined by measuring absorbance at 320 nm in a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Lambda 35) using extinction coefficient of 30 L/(g.cm).

Holocellulose Recovery from Switchgrass

Extractive-free biomass samples (~0.6 g) were mixed with peracetic acid (~2.1 g) and DI water (~5.8 mL)35. This mixture was then stirred at 25 °C for 24 h in dark followed by repeated centrifugation and washing with DI water to isolate the holocellulose samples.

Cellulose Recovery from Switchgrass

Cellulose was isolated from holocellulose samples. Holocellulose samples (~0.10 g) were suspended in 17.5 wt% NaOH solution (~5.00 mL) at 25 °C for 2 h. The mixture was then diluted to 8.75% NaOH solution by adding ~5.00 mL of DI water and allowed to stir for additional 2 h. The isolated α-cellulose samples were then recovered from centrifugation, washed with 50 mL of 1% acetic acid and an excess of DI water until the pH of the filtrate was close to 7.

Enzymatic Hydrolysis

Enzymatic hydrolysis procedure was adapted from NREL LAP “Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Biomass”36. Glucan loadings of solids was 0.1%. The samples were never dried before enzymatic hydrolysis to avoid pore collapse. Enzymatic hydrolyses were performed in Erlenmeyer flasks in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 4.8) and 1% (v/v) of antibiotic antimycotic solution (Sigma Aldrich cat# A5955). Enzymes used were cellulase from Trichoderma reesei ATCC 26921 (Sigma-Aldrich Corp. in St. Louis, MO) and β-glucosidase from almonds (Sigma-Aldrich, cat# G0395). Enzyme loading for cellulose and holocellulose recovered from switchgrass, and switchgrass at lower enzyme loading was 20 FPU (filter paper units) cellulase +40 CBU (cellobiose units) β-glucosidase per gram glucan. High enzyme loading for switchgrass was 40 FPU cellulase +80 CBU β-glucosidase per gram glucan. The mixture was incubated at 50 °C with shaking at 150 rpm for 72 hours. The reaction was stopped by quenching the aliquots for 10 min in a boiling water bath followed by centrifugation (MiniSpin Plus, Eppendorf AG, Hauppauge, NY) at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The liquid supernatants were then frozen to −20 °C until sugar quantification. Supernatants were diluted, filtered and injected into high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) using Dionex ICS-3000 (Dionex Corp. in Sunnyvale, CA) equipped with an electrochemical detector, a guard CarboPac PA1 column (2 × 50 mm, Dionex), a CarboPac PA1 column (2 × 250 mm, Dionex), a AS40 automated sampler and a PC 10 pneumatic controller at room temperature. 0.20 M and 0.40 M NaOH was used as the eluent and post-column rinsing effluent. The total analysis time was 70 min, with a flow rate 0.40 mL/min. Calibration was performed with external standard solutions of glucose and xylose, and fucose as an internal standard.

Modified Simons’ Staining Technique

The modified Simons’ staining technique was performed according to Chandra et al.21. 1% Direct Orange 15 dye (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) solution in water was ultrafiltered at 4000 rpm for 30 min through 100 KDa membrane (Amicon Ultra-15 UFC910024, EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA). The high molecular weight fraction was used for analysis. 1% solids on dry basis, 0.1% dye, 1% NaCl and 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer solution were shaken in serum vials at 70 °C for 24 hours. The samples were centrifuged, supernatants diluted and absorption was measured at 445 nm by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Lambda 20, Akron, OH).

Microscopy

Small leaf cuttings were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) and 2% formaldehyde solution (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) for 1 h at RT under slight vacuum. The pieces were then removed from fixative and washed three times in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. This solution was replaced consecutively by 10, 30, 50, 70, 90, 100, and 100% v/v ethanol in water, each for 10 minutes. This was followed by infiltration with 25, 50, 75, 100, and 100% v/v medium-grade LR White (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) solution in ethanol each for 8 hours at RT. Each resin infiltrated sample was then placed in a gelatin capsule and filled completely with pure LR White. Curing was done at 60 °C for 24 h in a gravity convection oven37. Transverse sections of resin blocks were taken on Leica UM7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems Inc. in Buffalo Grove, IL) in slices of approximately 500 nm for light and confocal microscopy and 100 nm for TEM. Brightfield microscopy was carried out on Nikon Eclipse E600 on sections stained with 0.02% Toluidine Blue for 10 minutes. Confocal microscopy was carried out on Leica SP8 with excitation using 405 nm laser and detection at 510–570 nm for auto-fluorescence of lignin. For TEM, slices were transferred to 100 mesh copper grids, followed by staining with 1% potassium permanganate (KMnO4) in distilled water for 10 minutes and washed with distilled water. The stained samples were examined in a Zeiss Libra 120 TEM (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY) equipped with in-line Omega filter at 120 kV. A LaB6 filament with an emission current of ~6 μA was used to ensure minimal morphological changes of the samples during TEM imaging. ImageJ software38 was used to adjust brightness, contrast, addition of scale bars and labeling.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. 1.

    Ragauskas, A. J. et al. The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials. Science 311, 484–489, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114736 (2006).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Langan, P. et al. Neutron technologies for bioenergy research. Industrial Biotechnology 8, 209–216 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    O’Neill, H. et al. Production of bacterial cellulose with controlled deuterium-hydrogen substitution for neutron scattering studies. Methods in enzymology 565, 123–146, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2015.08.031 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Evans, B. R. et al. Production of deuterated switchgrass by hydroponic cultivation. Planta 242, 215–222, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2298-0 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Evans, B. R. & Shah, R. Development of approaches for deuterium incorporation in plants. Methods in enzymology 565, 213–243, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2015.07.014 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Foston, M. B., McGaughey, J., O’Neill, H., Evans, B. R. & Ragauskas, A. Deuterium incorporation in biomass cell wall components by NMR analysis. Analyst 137, 1090–1093, https://doi.org/10.1039/C2AN16025K (2012).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Waber, J. & Sakai, W. S. The Effect of Growth in 99.8 Deuterium Oxide on the Ultrastructure of Winter Rye. Plant physiology 53, 128–130, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.53.1.128 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Evans, B. R. et al. Effect of D2O on Growth Properties and Chemical Structure of Annual Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 62, 2595–2604, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf4055566 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bhatia, C. R. & Smith, H. H. Adaptation and Growth Response of Arabidopsis thaliana to Deuterium. Planta 80, 176–184 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yang, X. Y. et al. Measuring the turnover rates of Arabidopsis proteins using deuterium oxide: an auxin signaling case study. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology 63, 680–695, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04266.x (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Katz, J. J. & Crespi, H. L. Deuterated organisms: cultivation and uses. Science 151, 1187–1194 (1966).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chen, F. & Dixon, R. A. Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nature biotechnology 25, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1316 (2007).

  13. 13.

    Bhagia, S., Muchero, W., Kumar, R., Tuskan, G. A. & Wyman, C. E. Natural genetic variability reduces recalcitrance in poplar. Biotechnology for biofuels 9, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0521-2 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Foston, M. et al. Chemical, ultrastructural and supramolecular analysis of tension wood in Populus tremula x alba as a model substrate for reduced recalcitrance. Energ Environ Sci 4, 4962–4971, https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE02073K (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jung, S., Foston, M., Kalluri, U. C., Tuskan, G. A. & Ragauskas, A. J. 3D Chemical Image using TOF-SIMS Revealing the Biopolymer Component Spatial and Lateral Distributions in Biomass. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 51, 12005–12008, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201205243 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Meng, X. et al. Effect of in Vivo Deuteration on Structure of Switchgrass Lignin. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5, 8004–8010 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shibata, S. & Bartell, L. S. Electron‐Diffraction Study of Water and Heavy Water. The Journal of chemical physics 42, 1147–1151, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1696094 (1965).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bartell, L. S., Roth, E. A., Hollowell, C. D., Kuchitsu, K. & Young, J. E. Electron‐Diffraction Study of the Structures of C2H4 and C2D4. The Journal of chemical physics 42, 2683–2686, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1703223 (1965).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pan, X. J. Role of functional groups in lignin inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 2, https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2008.005 (2008).

  20. 20.

    Yang, B. & Wyman, C. E. BSA treatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in lignin containing substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng 94, 611–617, https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20750 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chandra, R. P. & Arantes, V. & Saddler, J. Steam pretreatment of agricultural residues facilitates hemicellulose recovery while enhancing enzyme accessibility to cellulose. Bioresource technology 185, 302–307, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.106 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chandra, R., Ewanick, S., Hsieh, C. & Saddler, J. N. The characterization of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates prior to enzymatic hydrolysis, part 1: a modified Simons’ staining technique. Biotechnol Prog 24, 1178–1185, https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.33 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    O’Brien, T. P., Feder, N. & McCully, M. E. Polychromatic staining of plant cell walls by toluidine blue O. Protoplasma 59, 368–373, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01248568 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Donaldson, L. A. Lignification and lignin topochemistry — an ultrastructural view. Phytochemistry 57, 859–873, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00049-8 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wilson, J. R., Brown, R. H. & Windham, W. R. Influence of Leaf Anatomy on the Dry Matter Digestibility of C3, C4, and C3/C4 Intermediate Types of Panicum Species1. Crop Science 23, 141–146, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300010041x (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Koch, G. & Schmitt, U. In Plant Cell Monographs Vol. 20 41–69 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Cope, B. T., Bose, S., Crespi, H. L. & Katz, J. J. Growth of Lemna in H2O-D2O Mixtures: Enhancement by Kinetin. Botanical Gazette 126, 214–221, https://doi.org/10.1086/336323 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cooke, R. J., Grego, S., Roberts, K. & Davies, D. D. The mechanism of deuterium oxide-induced protein degradation in Lemna minor. Planta 148, 374–380, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388126 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bhagia, S., Dhir, R., Kumar, R. & Wyman, C. E. Deactivation of Cellulase at the Air-Liquid Interface Is the Main Cause of Incomplete Cellulose Conversion at Low Enzyme Loadings. Scientific reports 8, 1350, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19848-3 (2018).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Karkonen, A. & Koutaniemi, S. Lignin biosynthesis studies in plant tissue cultures. Journal of integrative plant biology 52, 176–185, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00913.x (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Xiao‐Yuan, Y. et al. Measuring the turnover rates of Arabidopsis proteins using deuterium oxide: an auxin signaling case study. The Plant Journal 63, 680–695, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04266.x (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Donaldson, L. A. Abnormal lignin distribution in wood from severely drought stressed Pinus radiata trees. Iawa Journal 23, 161–178 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Schützendübel, A. & Polle, A. Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal‐induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization. Journal of experimental botany 53, 1351–1365, https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1351 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sluiter, A. et al. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure NREL/TP -510−42618 (2008).

  35. 35.

    Bhagia, S., Pu, Y., Evans, B. R., Davison, B. H. & Ragauskas, A. J. Hemicellulose characterization of deuterated switchgrass. Bioresource Technology (2018).

  36. 36.

    Selig, M., Weiss, N. & Ji, Y. Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Biomass. Report No. TP-510-42629, (National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Golden CO 2008).

  37. 37.

    Wilson, S. M. & Bacic, A. Preparation of plant cells for transmission electron microscopy to optimize immunogold labeling of carbohydrate and protein epitopes. Nat. Protocols 7, 1716–1727 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the U. S. Department of Energy Office of Science through the Genomic Science Program, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, under contract FWP ERKP752. Use of transmission electron microscopy and ultramicrotomy was provided by the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences (CNMS), a U. S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, Tennessee, under proposal no. CNMS2016-R83. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U. S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.B. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. S.B., X.M., B.E. wrote Materials and Methods. S.B., X.M., B.D. and A.R. planned the manuscript. B.E. carried out cultivation of switchgrass. X.M., G.B., Y.P. and S.B. carried out enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass. X.M. did the extraction of switchgrass cellulose and holocellulose. S.B. performed cellulose accessibility and prepared samples for microscopy. S.B., J.D. and K.R. performed ultramicrotomy of switchgrass. J.D. assisted S.B. in light and confocal microscopy, J.C. and H.H. assisted S.B. in TEM imaging. S.B., X.M., B.E., B.D. and A.R. proofed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur J. Ragauskas.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhagia, S., Meng, X., Evans, B.R. et al. Ultrastructure and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Deuterated Switchgrass. Sci Rep 8, 13226 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31269-w

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing