Mutations causing low level antibiotic resistance ensure bacterial survival in antibiotic-treated hosts

Abstract

In 474 genome sequenced Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from 34 cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, 40% of these harbor mutations in the mexZ gene encoding a negative regulator of the MexXY-OprM efflux pump associated with aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance. Surprisingly, resistance to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones of mexZ mutants was far below the breakpoint of clinical resistance. However, the fitness increase of the mutant bacteria in presence of the relevant antibiotics, as demonstrated in competition experiments between mutant and ancestor bacteria, showed that 1) very small phenotypic changes cause significant fitness increase with severe adaptive consequences, and 2) standardized phenotypic tests fail to detect such low-level variations. The frequent appearance of P. aeruginosa mexZ mutants in CF patients is directly connected to the intense use of the target antibiotics, and low-level antibiotic resistance, if left unnoticed, can result in accumulation of additional genetic changes leading to high-level resistance.

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a frequent colonizer of the airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, where it adapts easily and readily establishes chronic infections1,2. Treatment of P. aeruginosa lung infections is usually based on susceptibility testing of clinical isolates cultured from the patients’ airways secretions. In the initial period of colonization the aim is complete eradication of the infecting bacteria (P. aeruginosa) whereas in later stages the aim is at improving the lung function and diminish lung tissue damage, inflammation and thereby loss of lung function. However, the clinical outcome often does not confirm the importance of the intensive and frequent antibiotic treatment strategy, since in many cases the targeted bacteria persist in the patient airways despite their susceptibility to the administered drug3. For example, no correlation between antibiotic susceptibility to tobramycin and ceftazidime and clinical outcome has been reported4. A large number of P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 474) obtained from 34 young CF patients were genotyped by whole genome sequencing, and it was found that a small number of genes (n = 52) were targeted by patho-adaptive mutations, suggested to increase P. aeruginosa fitness during adaptation in the CF lungs5. Among these mutations, it was found that mutations in the mexZ gene were more frequent than any other patho-adaptive mutation in agreement with findings from other studies6,7,8,9,10,11.

MexZ is a negative regulator of the mexXY genes12, which together with oprM encode the MexXY-OprM efflux pump13. MexXY-OprM is one of four multidrug efflux systems of the resistance-nodulation-cell division family in P. aeruginosa14. The MexXY-OprM pump is often associated with active efflux of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones15, and recently aminoglycoside resistance in P. aeruginosa isolated from CF patients was reported to arise from convergent evolution in the mexZ gene16.

In many CF centers inhalation of tobramycin with or without per oral ciprofloxacin is one of the most important antibiotic therapies against initial and subsequent P. aeruginosa airway infections17. Moreover, tobramycin is one of the most frequently used drugs for intravenous (i.v.) treatment of chronically infected CF patients, and oral ciprofloxacin is used for maintenance therapy between i.v. courses to diminish inflammation and loss of lung function18. Because of the frequent use of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones in CF therapy there is a major selection pressure for increased tolerance to these antibiotics, arguably including constitutive overproduction of mexXY in P. aeruginosa during adaptation to the CF airways. Mutations in the genes PA5471.1, armZ, mexZ, and in the genes encoding the two-component system ParRS, have all been described to result in overproduction of mexXY15.

This study was initiated on the basis of (1) genomic investigations of 474 P. aeruginosa isolates from CF patients5, which showed that mutations in mexZ were more frequent that changes in any other gene; and (2) lack of correlation between these mutations and clinically relevant antibiotic resistance. It was therefore considered important to determine the phenotype of mexZ mutant strains in order to identify the selection pressure in CF airways, which could enrich for the occurrence and maintenance of mexZ bacterial cell lines.

Results

Mutations in mexZ identified in P. aeruginosa from airways of CF patients

Among the 474 genome sequenced P. aeruginosa isolates5 we identified 193 isolates harboring mutations in the mexZ gene. These isolates represent 20 of the 36 clone types isolated from 23 of the 34 CF patients from whom the isolate collection was obtained5. We identified 110 insertion or deletions (INDELs) and 83 single-nucleotide non-synonymous mutations (SNPs) constituting 40 unique sequence variants that were scattered throughout the gene coding sequence with no apparent mutational hot-spots (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Table S1). However, we did observe a slightly higher number of mutations localized in the C-terminal domain of MexZ in agreement with previous findings16. Interestingly, 30 of the 40 unique sequence variants were INDELs (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Table S1) similar to some of the previously published data7, and in contrast to other studies that have reported higher frequencies of SNPs10 (Supplementary Fig. S1). The clinical mexZ mutations in this study either resulted in a frameshift or a non-synonymous mutation (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Table S1). All the non-synonymous mutations mapped to each of the three domains of MexZ, in the proximity of genomic loci that have been previously connected with loss of MexZ function19. Thus, we expected that the vast majority of the reported clinical mutations in the mexZ gene lead to a complete loss-of-function and an increased expression of mexXY. Moreover, no direct association was found between type of mutation (SNP/INDEL), specific mutation locus, and the antibiotic resistance phenotype (Fig. 1). None of the 474 sequenced isolates harbored mutations in parR or PA5471.1, while one isolate had a mutation in PA5471, and eight isolates had mutations in parS. Six of the eight isolates containing a parS mutation also had a mexZ mutation. However, we found no correlation between multiple regulator mutations and resistance to any of the tested antibiotics. In addition, we found no evidence for mexZ being fixed together with any other specific mutations. These observations suggests that among the clinical P. aeruginosa isolates from CF patients at the Copenhagen CF Clinic, mexZ is by far the dominant target gene for mutations potentially affecting expression of mexXY. The strong selection for mutations in mexZ was further documented by fixation of the mutated alleles over time in the airway populations (Supplementary Figs S2 and S3).

Figure 1
figure1

Mapping of clinical obtained mutations within the mexZ gene in P. aeruginosa. Here, mexZ mutations were mapped to one of the three functional mexZ domains; the DNA binding domain (α-helix 1 to α-helix 3), where α-helix 3 is the DNA recognition helix, and a C-terminal domain (α-helix 4 to α-helix 9)19. For each domain, the number of mexZ mutations consisting of a SNP or INDEL is noted with the accompanying MIC determination for the known MexXY-OprM substrates tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin. The clinical break-off points are presented according to EUCAST guidelines21.

The regulatory phenotype of mexZ mutations

To investigate the phenotype of mexZ mutations in the clinical P. aeruginosa isolates, levels of MexY mRNA were determined from a number of representative strains isolated from 3 different CF patients (Fig. 2). In 8 out of 8 mexZ mutants of 3 different clone types harboring either missense mutations or deletions, an induction of the MexY mRNA was observed (more than 20 fold), whereas a strain with no mutation in mexZ expressed MexY mRNA at the low level similar to the wild-type. This suggests that all the different clinical mexZ mutations (both INDELs and SNPs) resulted in loss of function of the MexZ regulator. Interestingly, mexY expression varied greatly between the clinical mexZ mutants (from roughly 30 to 100 fold induction); we did not, however, find any correlation between high mexY expression and increased resistance to MexXY-OprM substrates (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S2).

Figure 2
figure2

MexZ and mexY expression for selected clinical isolates. Relative expression of mexZ and mexY determined by RT-qPCR on RNA extracted from selected clinical isolates all of which contained a mexZ mutation apart from sample #1 from patient 9 (see Table S3 for details). All data were normalized to 16S RNA and ΔCt values between the genes of interest and 16S RNA were set at 1 for PAO1 wild-type strain. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Characterization of the functional consequences of mutations in the mexZ gene in the clinical strains is complicated due to the many other mutations accumulated in the genomes of these strains. Therefore, a PAO1 reference strain with a complete deletion of the mexZ gene was constructed for thorough phenotypic characterization of mexZ null-mutations without interference from other mutations in the genome (see details in Supplementary Information). We decided to delete the entire mexZ gene in PAO1 in order to construct a true knock-out variant and because we predict that the majority of the clinical INDELs and SNPs in our collection are likely to result in a functionally inactive MexZ protein (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S2), as observed in other works9,10,11,16,19.

Expression of the efflux pump operon mexXY in PAO1 wild-type and mexZ mutant bacteria was analyzed using qPCR (Fig. 3). Aminoglycosides are known to induce the expression of the mexXY operon20. Although the aminoglycoside tobramycin is used more frequently in the clinic to treat P. aeruginosa infections in CF patients we chose to use amikacin as a model aminoglycoside antibiotic for two reasons: (1) amikacin gave a stronger phenotype in MIC experiments (see next paragraph), and (2) amikacin has previously been used as a model aminoglycoside for investigations of the MexXY-OprM pump16, therefore making easier to compare our results with phenotypes deriving from previously documented mutations. We grew bacteria in LB broth in absence or presence of sub-MIC concentrations of amikacin and determined gene expression of mexZ and mexXY-oprM operon. When PAO1 ΔmexZ was grown without antibiotic, a roughly 20-fold increase in mexY transcription compared to the wild-type cells grown under the same conditions was observed (Fig. 3). As expected no mexZ transcripts were detected in PAO1 ΔmexZ under both growth conditions. PAO1 grown in the presence of sub-MIC concentrations of amikacin showed a 7-fold increase in mexY transcription compared to growth in the absence of amikacin (Fig. 3). Thus, as expected, the intrinsic response to aminoglycosides leads to an increased expression of mexXY15. PAO1 ΔmexZ grown in the presence of sub-MIC concentrations of amikacin only showed a 2.5-fold increase in mexY transcription compared to PAO1 grown under the same conditions (Fig. 3). This suggests that deletion of mexZ results in a maximal induction of mexXY (with or without antibiotics), and an overall 2.5-fold extra expression in the presence of amikacin. Interestingly, the OprM transcription level was unaltered in PAO1 ΔmexZ grown with or without the addition of amikacin (Fig. 3). These qPCR data confirm that inactivation of mexZ gene results in mexXY induction during growth.

Figure 3
figure3

mexY and oprM expression. Comparative expression of the MexZ, MexY and OprM mRNA by RT–qPCR of PAO1 and PAO1 ΔmexZ, bacteria grown to exponential phase (OD600 = 0.5) in LB medium. Every experiment were related to PAO1 (wild-type) as indicated by the dash line. If amikacin was supplemented it was added at OD600 0.1 at sub-MIC concentration (1 µg/mL). All data were normalized to the endogenous reference gene rpsL15. No mexZ expression was detected in experiments with PAO1 ΔmexZ and no bar is shown. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

To fully understand the consequences of mutations in the mexZ regulatory gene, we investigated global gene expression profiles of PAO1 wild type and mexZ mutant by genome-wide RNA sequencing. Cells were grown in LB without antibiotics, and RNA was extracted at OD600 0.5. RNA sequencing showed little or no difference between the cellular transcriptomes of PAO1 and PAO1 ΔmexZ. Indeed, only three differentially expressed genes were identified as a result of the mexZ mutation: mexX and mexY transcription was induced, while mexZ mRNA levels were reduced, as expected (Table 1). These results confirm what was observed in qPCR analysis and clearly show that the MexZ regulator only affects expression of mexXY operon, without influencing any other transcriptional activities.

Table 1 Transcriptomic profiling of mexZ mutant strains. Cultures of PAO1 and PAO1 ΔmexZ, were grown to exponential phase (OD600 = 0.5) in LB medium.

Antibiotic resistance levels in mexZ mutant strains

MIC values for the 474 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa including 184 out of 193 mexZ mutants were determined using E-tests (Liofilchem®, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) for 8 clinically relevant antibiotics including tobramycin and ciprofloxacin, and susceptibility/resistance definitions are according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines21 (Table 2). This analysis showed that the mexZ mutation only confers phenotypic resistance to few of the tested antibiotics. For instance, only 12 of the 184 (7%) investigated mexZ mutants were resistant to the MexXY-OprM substrate tobramycin, and 52 showed clinical resistance to ciprofloxacin (Table 2).

Table 2 MIC determination for clinical P. aeruginosa isolates mexZ mutations. MIC determined with E-tests (Liofilchem®, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) on Müller-Hinton agar; Amikacin (AMK), Tobramycin (TOB), Gentamicin (GEN), Ceftazidime (CEF), Meropenem (MER), Aztreonam (AZT), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), and Colistin (COL).

The constructed PAO1 ΔmexZ mutant was also analyzed for its resistance to antibiotics using E-tests and the broth dilution method (Table 3). The chromosomal deletion of mexZ in PAO1 only affected the MIC of the already known MexXY-OprM substrates fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides. Deleting mexZ in PAO1 resulted in slightly increased MIC values for all tested aminoglycosides as well as for ciprofloxacin. These slightly increased resistance levels were caused by induction of the MexXY-OprM pump, since cultures of PAO1 ΔmexY showed a decreased MIC value for the same compounds compared to the wild-type (Table 3). Increasing the OprM concentration in PAO1 ΔmexZ, using pXZL34 with an IPTG inducible OprM construct22, did not increase resistance to ciprofloxacin or amikacin (data not shown), suggesting that although OprM is expressed from the distal MexAB-OprM operon and is also required for the function of the MexAB efflux pump, the OprM level is not limiting for efflux pump activity when MexXY is fully induced and is sufficient to support the function of both the MexAB-OprM and the MexXY-OprM efflux pump. The differences in MIC between the mutants and their wild-type ancestor, PAO1, were in all cases minor, and none of the increased MIC values for PAO1 ΔmexZ could be categorized as ‘resistance’ based on the EUCAST break-off points for amikacin, tobramycin, gentamicin or ciprofloxacin21. When referring to MIC values in the following experiments we are referring to MIC values obtained only using the broth dilution method. The MIC determinations of the PAO1 ΔmexZ mutant are in agreement with the MIC data obtained from P. aeruginosa isolated from CF patients; i.e., there is no consistent correlation between a mutation in the mexZ gene and the clinical resistance to MexXY-OprM substrates. This may indicate that the in-patient selection pressure for mexZ mutations in P. aeruginosa may be driven by other factors than antibiotics.

Table 3 Wild-type and ΔmexZ phenotype(s).

Several environmental stress factors have been reported to interfere with the bacterial persistence in the airways of CF patients: increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS)23, bile aspiration caused by gastro-esophageal reflux24, and an abnormally increased Cl- concentration25. ROS have been reported to induce mexXY expression in a PA5471 dependent fashion26. We therefore investigated whether a mexZ mutant exhibits an advantage over the wild-type if challenged by any of these stress factors. However, sensitivities to ROS, bile salt, and NaCl were equal for wild-type and mexZ mutants in all tested isolates, and none of these factors therefore seem to explain the positive selection for the mexZ mutation in vivo (Table 3)26. Furthermore, no difference was observed between the wild-type and ΔmexZ when grown in presence of multiple stresses: 0.5 X MIC ROS, 0.5 X MIC amikacin, and 0.5 X MIC NaCl (data not shown). When the concentrations of ROS, amikacin, and NaCl were increased no bacteria survived, as expected. Thus, no apparent differences in the ability to survive CF airway stress were observed when comparing wild-type and mexZ mutant bacteria.

Growth physiology and catabolic properties of mexZ mutants

The apparent selective advantage of mexZ mutations could be the result of increased growth rates, improved capacities to utilize one or more carbon sources, or to form biofilm in sputum. Doubling times were determined both in LB and in ASM, which mimics the nutrient composition in CF lungs27. No significant growth rate differences were observed when comparing mexZ mutant and wild-type isolates, and biofilm development analyzed under two different growth conditions, LB and 1 X M9 minimal media with 0.2% glucose, also showed no measurable difference (Table 3).

We used the Omnilog Biolog (Biolog, Hayward CA, USA) system to monitor the catabolism of 190 different carbon sources for PAO1 and PAO1 ΔmexZ (Supplementary Fig. S4A,B). PAO1 and PAO1 ΔmexZ were able to catabolize the same carbon sources and we found no significant differences in growth when using these (Supplementary Fig. S4A,B).

Fitness increase of mexZ mutant cells in presence of antibiotics

In order to assess the importance of the only phenotypic change observed for the mexZ mutant relative to its wild type ancestor, i.e. the very small increases in aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance, the growth and fitness properties of the two PAO1 strains in presence of sub-lethal concentrations of antibiotics were determined.

First, we investigated whether mexZ deficient cells could have an advantage when growing in medium with relevant antibiotics at, or close to, the MIC breakpoint. In presence of sub-MIC concentrations of the non-MexXY-OprM substrate, colistin, all strains (PAO1, PAO1 ΔmexZ, and PAO1 ΔmexY) showed identical growth phenotypes (Fig. 4A). However, when grown in medium with amikacin or ciprofloxacin (Fig. 4B,C) mexZ deficient cells showed a growth phenotype similar to wild-type cells grown without antibiotics, suggesting that in these conditions the mexZ mutant has a fitness increase over the wild type strain. This specific growth phenotype depends on a functional efflux-pump, since PAO1 ΔmexY shows a reduced growth rate compared to that of the wild-type and PAO1 ΔmexZ in media with amikacin or ciprofloxacin (Fig. 4B,C).

Figure 4
figure4

mexZ deficient bacteria has a faster recovery rate when challenged with MexXY-OprM substrates. In panel (A–C) we see antibiotic tolerance measured over time for PAO1, PAO1 ΔmexZ, and PAO1 ΔmexY to; (A) sub-MIC concentrations of colistin (1 µg/mL), (B) sub-MIC concentrations of ciprofloxacin (0.064 µg/mL), and (C) sub-MIC concentrations of amikacin (0.5 µg/mL). In (A,B), and (C) PAO1 was grown in the absence of colistin, amikacin, or ciprofloxacin, serving as a control. Panel (D) to (G) shows direct competition experiments between PAO1 Tn7:gfp (PAO1) and PAO1 ΔmexZ; (D) competition in LB in the absence of antibiotic, (E) competition in LB supplemented with sub-MIC concentrations of colistin (1 µg/mL), (F) competition in LB supplemented with sub-MIC concentrations of ciprofloxacin (0.125 µg/mL), (G) competition in LB supplemented with sub-MIC concentrations of amikacin (1 µg/mL). Bars represent the standard error of the log10 mean number of CFU per ml.

Second, we investigated PAO1 and PAO1 ΔmexZ in a flow-cell biofilm system developed for pharmaco-kinetic and -dynamic investigations with dosing of antibiotics according to the treatment regimes of CF patients in the clinic. Because ciprofloxacin is primarily used as maintainance therapy between i.v. courses in the clinic18, i.e. used as frequently as aminoglycosides if not even more (Supplementary Fig. S2), it was selected to illustrate a MexXY-OprM substrate (and meropenem as a non-substrate for same pump) in the flow-cell biofilm system. Each of the two strains (tagged with yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) and cyan fluorescent protein (CFP), respectively) were allowed to establish biofilms for 3–4 days in the flow cells before antibiotics were administered (see Material and Methods for details). After treatment with antibiotics for 24 hours the biofilms were stained with ‘dead’ stain propidium iodide (PI) and analyzed in the confocal microscope (Fig. 5A). The individual biomasses and dead-cell populations were determined by the quantitative COMSTAT analysis (Fig. 5B). Figure 5 clearly shows that the mexZ mutant bacteria signifincantly better (t-test (two-tailed); p-value < 0.001) tolerate the bolus of ciprofloxacin than the wild-type bacteria. This is particularly interesting because the mexZ mutant survives, even though concentrations of ciprofloxacin above MIC were administered to the biofilm cultures, and despite the very moderate difference in MIC between PAO1 and PAO1 ΔmexZ. In a parallel biofilm experiment, in which meropenem (not excreted by the MexXY-OprM efflux pump) was administered to the two bacterial populations, no difference in survival of the bacteria was observed (Fig. 5). These results show that mexZ mutant bacteria survive better in clinically relevant antibiotic containing environments, resulting (1) in their competitive advantage in populations comprising both wild type and MexZ mutant bacteria, and (2) fixation of the specific mutation.

Figure 5
figure5

Survival of PAO1 wild-type and PAO1 ΔmexZ during treatment of biofilms with ciprofloxacin and meropenem. (A) Representative images of PAO1 tagged with yellow fluorescent protein and PAO1 ΔmexZ tagged with cyan fluorescent protein after live/dead staining (dead cells were stained for visualization using propidium iodide). Biofilms were either untreated, treated with one bolus (4 mg/l) Ciprofloxacin treatment for 24 h, or one bolus (107 mg/l) Meropenem for 24 h. Biofilms were grown on glucose minimal medium and treated with antibioitcs at day 3 (see Material and Methods). (B) COMSTAT quantification of the biomass of live and dead cells after live/dead staining of a PAO1 wild-type biofilm and PAO1 ΔmexZ biofilm from the same treatment regime as described in (A). In at least two independent experiments 3–4 random images were taken from each flow channel. A t-test (two-tailed) was performed between PAO1 and PAO1 ΔmexZ treated with ciprofloxacin showing a highly significant difference in survival (p < 0.001) as indicated by the three ***.

Next, we tested the mexZ associated fitness increase in competition experiments including equal numbers of wild type and mexZ mutant bacteria (tagged differentially with fluorescent proteins) in liquid cultures in shaking flasks with low concentrations of antibiotics. In presence of amikacin or ciprofloxacin (sub-MIC concentrations) growing for more than 40 generations in direct competition, the mexZ mutant bacteria eventually out-competed the wild-type bacteria (Fig. 4F,G). When grown in LB or in LB supplemented with sub-MIC concentrations of colistin (which is not excreted by the MexXY-OprM efflux pump), both strains were stably maintained at the same ratio (Fig. 4D,E). These results show that mexZ mutations confer increased fitness in environments containing relevant antibiotics, and that in absence of these antibiotics mutant and wildtype cells are equally fit.

Discussion

Treating patients suffering from persistent bacterial infections with antibiotics relies to a great extent on careful monitoring of resistance development. In line with this need, standardized protocols for clinical antibiotic susceptibility testing have been developed together with approved values for resistance break points (EUCAST). The obvious goal of course is to treat health threatening infections with antibiotics, which are assumed to be effective, and to avoid resistance development as much as possible. Previous studies have, however, shown a lack of correlation between clinical antibiotic susceptibility testing and clinical outcome3,4. The striking finding of this study is that very small increases in antibiotic resistance associated with mexZ mutations, which normally are undetected or neglected in the clinical microbiological laboratory using current standardized diagnostic methods, seem to be drivers of selection of mexZ mutants in CF patients. When P. aeruginosa colonizes the CF airways the bacteria are challenged with different stress factors, which may interfere with persistence, such as presence of antibiotics, increased levels of ROS23, bile aspiration caused by gastro-oesophageal reflux24, and an abnormally increased Cl concentration25. Surprisingly, however, we did not observe any marked difference in susceptibility to any of these stress factors, when comparing wild type and mexZ mutant under standard laboratory conditions. In addition, the mexZ mutants did not show any change in growth rate nor improved potential to form biofilm. However, when MexZ deficient bacteria were competed against wild type bacteria in presence of sub-MIC concentrations of amikacin or ciprofloxacin, the mutant bacteria quickly outcompeted the wild type. This was true both in direct competition in LB Broth (Fig. 4), and in our flow-chamber biofilm system, which mimics the P. aeruginosa biofilm lifestyle and the antibiotic treatment used in the CF clinic28, the mutant bacteria survived better than the wildtype bacteria (Fig. 5A,B). These results show that mexZ deficient bacteria are superior to the wild-type strains in clinically relevant sub-MIC growth conditions, which most likely are found in the lungs and sputum of CF patients during antibiotic treatment.

Since aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones are very important first-line drugs for treating P. aeruginosa airway infections in CF patients, it is of major importance that changes in antibiotic susceptibility are identified in the clinical microbiological laboratory. However, the differences in aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone MIC values for the mexZ mutant relative to those of the wild-type ancestor, PAO1, were in all cases minor, and none of the increased MIC values for PAO1 ΔmexZ could be categorized as resistance based on the EUCAST break-off points for amikacin, tobramycin, gentamicin or ciprofloxacin21. The discrepancy between the accumulation of mexZ mutations, and the lack of a clear antibiotic resistance phenotype when standard EUCAST methods for antibiotic resistance assessments are used21, creates a clinical problem since the fitness increases of the mutant bacteria in presence of the relevant antibiotics remain undetected, and therefore treatment may erroneously be continued. In fact, all 13 CF patients listed in Supplementary Fig. S2 received tobramycin and/or ciprofloxacin treatment after the fixation of mexZ mutations in the respective P. aeruginosa populations.

Genetic changes increasing even slightly the fitness of an infecting bacterial populations under conditions of antibiotic treatment may also increase the chance of acquisition of new mutations making the bacteria truly resistant to the respective antibiotics. Recently, an investigation of antibiotic resistance development in Mycobacterium smegmatis documented how mutations in genes encoding ribosomal components, resulting in low-level resistance to one or more antibiotics, may promote the subsequent acquisition of mutations resulting in high-level antibiotic resistance29. We suggest that mexZ mutations in a similar but mechanistically different way, may create evolutionary opportunities for the mutant subpopulations to evolve high-level resistance (cf. Supplementary Fig. S3; Patient 1). In addition, we also observed clonal interferences between competing lineages with different beneficial mexZ mutations (cf. Supplementary Fig. S2; Patient 5). Here, three different mexZ mutations approached fixation simultaneously, with one of them eventually being the sole mexZ mutation isolated from this patient for the entire study period.

Although our mexZ investigation is relevant for the chronic bacterial persistence in the upper airways in CF patients, the basic idea that beneficial mutations can evade clinical microbial diagnostics can be extrapolated to other genes in unrelated infection scenarios. It is imperative for optimal and effective antibiotic treatments of chronic bacterial infections that the diagnostic determination of antibiotic susceptibility is correct and constitutes a reliable information base for designing a treatment strategy for the patient. If the clinical microbiology laboratory only determines antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria according to the standardized guidelines, it is highly likely that relevant mutations conferring phenotypic low-level antibiotic resistance will be ignored, which may have important consequences for the efficacy of the treatment, as reported here for the mexZ mutations in P. aeruginosa. Although the treatment strategies have improved significantly during the last decades, resulting in prolongation of the life span of CF patients17, there is room for further development of even more effective antibiotic regimens delaying the chronic infection state of the most problematic bacterial infections such as those caused by P. aeruginosa30. For CF patients based on the discordance between the clinical antibiotics susceptibility test results and the clinical outcomes, we suggest that targeted genotypic investigations may positively complement routine susceptibility testing, informing about genetic changes, which may have predictive impacts on the non-detectable resistance profile and associated persistence of colonization of the airway population.

Material and Methods

Growth conditions

Clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were grown in Lysogeny Broth (LB) medium, 1 X M9 minimal medium supplemented with 0.2% glucose, or in artificial sputum medium (ASM)27. All liquid cultures were incubated at 37 °C with shaking (200 r.p.m.) unless otherwise stated. Escherichia coli was cultured on LB agar, and P. aeruginosa was cultured on Pseudomonas Isolation Agar (PIA; Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., St. Louis, USA) or LB agar. When necessary, antibiotics were added to the following concentrations: gentamicin, 100 µg/ml for P. aeruginosa and 10 µg/ml for E. coli; chloramphenicol, 20 µg/ml; ampicillin, 150 µg/ml; kanamycin, 50 µg/ml.

Bacterial strains and plasmids

All strain and plasmid constructs are listed in Supplementary Materials and methods and in Supplementary Table 1. Oligonucleotides for PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 2. In addition, we used a collection of 474 genome sequenced P. aeruginosa isolates from 34 CF children and young adults to measure the minimal inhibition concentration (MIC), using relevant antibiotics, for clinical strains with- and without a mexZ mutation.

Total RNA isolation

For RNA-seq and quantitative real-time-PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments, cultures were grown to exponential phase (OD600 = 0.5) in LB medium. For each strain, total RNA was extracted from at least three independent biological replicates using Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) followed by RNA clean & concentrator kit (Zymo Research, Irvin, USA) accordingly to vendors’ protocols. RNA quality was checked using RNA Nano kit on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 machine. Samples with an RNA integrity number (RIN) greater than 9 were used in downstream analysis.

qRT-PCR

For qRT-PCR experiments, after genomic DNA digestion, 1 µg of total RNA was retrotranscribed using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands). Primers designed to amplify mexZ, mexY, and oprM (Supplementary Table 2) were targeted to regions of unique sequences within the genes in wild-type PAO1. The qRT-PCR was performed using the QuantiTect SYBR® Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) on an Agilent Stratagene Mx3000P qPCR system. All data were normalized to either the 16S RNA (Fig. 2) or the endogenous reference gene rpsL15 (Fig. 3). These data were transformed to log2 to obtain a change difference (n-fold) between strains.

RNA sequencing and data analysis

For RNA-sequencing experiments, 10 µg of total RNA was depleted of ribosomal RNA using Ribo Zero rRNA removal kit for Gram-negative bacteria (Illumina). Strand-specific sequencing libraries were prepared using 50 ng of mRNA-enriched samples as input for TruSeq stranded mRNA library preparation kit (Illumina) following vendor’s recommendations. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina NextSeq 500 system to a depth of 15–20 million reads per samples. After quality filtering, raw reads were aligned using BWA aligner against the relevant genome (P. aeruginosa PAO1: NC_002516.2). Read counts for gene relative abundance were obtained using HTSeq-count tool from HTSeq package31,while gene differential expression and statistical analysis were performed as previously described32. The transcriptomic data have been submitted to the ArrayExpress database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) and assigned the identifier E-MTAB-5820.

Optical density measurements over time

The stress resistance assay was performed as previously described33. In short, the overnight cultures were diluted to a final desired inoculum of 5 × 105 cfu/mL, as described by Wiegand et al.34, with and without the antibiotic, and growth was monitored at OD600 in 96-well microtitre polystyrene plates for 20–24 h. The concentration of the antibiotic was adjusted to avoid killing of the bacteria; i.e. no visible growth after 24 hours. Here we used amikacin (0.5 µg/mL), ciprofloxacin (0.064 µg/mL), and colistin (1 µg/mL).

Minimal inhibition concentration measurements (MIC)

E-test

E-tests were performed with Mueller-Hinton agar plates (diameter, 140 mm) as previously described35. The direct colony suspension method was used to make a suspension of PAO1, PAO1 ΔmexZ and PAO1 in saline to the density of McFarland 0.5 turbidity standard, approximately corresponding to 1–2 × 108 CFU/mL for E. coli. E-tests (Liofilchem®, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) for clinical relevant antibiotics were used; amikacin, tobramycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, colistin, ceftazime, meropenem, and aztreonam. After application of the E-test, the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 16–20 h. MIC values were compared to the clinical EUCAST breakoff points21.

Broth micro-dilution

Broth micro-dilutions were performed in 96-well microtiter plates (polystyrene plates (BD Falcon; Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 351177)) as previously described with the exception that dilutions were performed in LB broth, not in Mueller-Hinton broth. Broth micro-dilutions were done for the clinically relevant antibiotics (all from Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC.) amikacin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, and colistin. In addition, the MICs with respect to hydrogen peroxide (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), NaCl (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), and bile salts (Oxgall; Neogen Corporation, Lansing, USA) were tested using the same protocol. After addition of antibiotic or stress factor, plates were incubated at 37 °C for 16–20 h. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the antimicrobial agent or stress factor that inhibits visible growth of the tested isolate as observed with the unaided eye34.

Biolog Phenotype Microarrays

Biolog Phenotype Microarrays were performed as previously described36. In short, PAO1 and PAO1 ΔmexZ strains were streaked on LB agar plates and incubated at 37 °C. Cells were swabbed from the plates and suspended in IF-0 GN Base (inoculation fluid) at a density corresponding to 42% transmittance in the Biolog turbidimeter. The cell suspensions were diluted in IF-0 minimal medium containing Biolog redox dye mixture D (tetrazolium), and aliquots were added to the two different carbon-source plates; PM1 and PM2A. The plates were incubated at 37 °C in an OmniLog plate reader (Biolog) for 48 h, and growth/respiration was measured kinetically by determining the colorimetric reduction of the tetrazolium dye. Export of OmniLog data was performed using OmniLog OL_FM/Kin 1.20.02 software (Biolog). The average area beneath each kinetic curve was used for analysis. Total catabolic function was calculated as previously described37.

Static biofilms

Biofilm formation in micro-titre plates was analysed as previously described38. PAO1 and PAO1 ΔmexZ were grown in either LB or 1 X M9 with 0.2% glucose overnight at 37 °C and diluted into identical media for the study of biofilm formation. The biofilm was stained by 0.1% solution of crystal violet (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and quantified in a plate reader (OD550 nm) using the growth media without added bacteria as the blank.

Pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic (PD/PK) flow chamber biofilms

The PD/PK system is based on bacterial biofilms grown under continuous culture conditions, simulating the changing antibiotic concentrations in CF patients during i.v. dosing. In this system the antibiotics decay similarly to what takes place in CF patients during treatment. Antibiotic treatment of biofilms were performed using differentially tagged strains, i.e. PAO1 tagged with yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) and PAO1 ΔmexZ tagged with cyan fluorescent protein (CFP). Dead cells were stained for visualization using propidium iodide (see Supplementary Material and methods for strain constructions). The one-compartment dynamic biofilm PD model has been previously described28. Briefly, biofilms were grown at 30 °C in flow chambers for 96 hours, at which point ciprofloxcacin or meropenem concentrations modeling human PK were applied. Each flow chamber was inoculated with 250 μL of overnight cultures of PAO1 or PAO1 ΔmexZ respectively diluted to an OD600 of 0.05 and left without flow for one hour. After one hour, flow was started with 40x diluted LB or minimal medium supplemented with 0.03 mM glucose at a flow rate of 20 ml/h using a peristaltic pump (Watson Marlow 205S). After cultivation for 72 hours, flow was stopped and medium was replaced with an antibiotic flask containing relevant concentrations of either ciprofloxacin or meropenem. Flow was restarted and medium was pumped from the dilution flask through the antibiotic flask to the flow chambers at a constant rate calculated to mimic the elimination rate constant of the antibiotic. Concentration-time profiles were based on PK parameters of ciprofloxacin and meropenem from healthy people and patients with CF39,40.

The target ciprofloxacin peak concentration, based on human population values, was calculated to be 400 mg IV = 4 mg/L, and for meropenem it was 107.5 mg/L. Using these target concentrations the model allows for the simulation of the human PL profile of the antibiotic while maintaining constant flow rate. Experiments were repeated 3 times in biological independent runs, and 3–4 images of each channel were collected from each run using a Zeiss LSM 510 meta confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) equipped with an argon/krypton laser and detectors and filter sets for simultaneous monitoring of CFP (excitation 458 nm, emission 490 nm) and YFP (excitaiotn 514 nm, emission 530 nm) for live cells, and propidium iodide, PI (excitation 543 nm, emission 565 nm) for dead cell staining. Images were obtained using a 40x/1.3 Plan-Neofluar oil objective. Multichannel simulated fluorescence projections (SFPs) and sections through the biofilms were generated using Imaris software (Bitplane AG, Switzerland). CLSM images were analyzed using COMSTAT41.

Ethics approval

The local ethics committee at the Capital Region of Denmark (Region Hovedstaden) approved the use of the stored P. aeruginosa isolates: registration number H-4-2015-FSP. We confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

References

  1. 1.

    Markussen, T. et al. Environmental heterogeneity drives within-host diversification and evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MBio 5, e01592–01514, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01592-14 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Marvig, R. L., Johansen, H. K., Molin, S. & Jelsbak, L. Genome analysis of a transmissible lineage of pseudomonas aeruginosa reveals pathoadaptive mutations and distinct evolutionary paths of hypermutators. PLoS Genet 9, e1003741, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003741 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hurley, M. N., Ariff, A. H., Bertenshaw, C., Bhatt, J. & Smyth, A. R. Results of antibiotic susceptibility testing do not influence clinical outcome in children with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 11, 288–292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2012.02.006 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Smith, A. L., Fiel, S. B., Mayer-Hamblett, N., Ramsey, B. & Burns, J. L. Susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and clinical response to parenteral antibiotic administration: lack of association in cystic fibrosis. Chest 123, 1495–1502 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Marvig, R. L., Sommer, L. M., Molin, S. & Johansen, H. K. Convergent evolution and adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa within patients with cystic fibrosis. Nat Genet 47, 57–64, https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3148 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Feliziani, S. et al. Mucoidy, quorum sensing, mismatch repair and antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis chronic airways infections. PLoS One 5, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012669 (2010).

  7. 7.

    Smith, E. E. et al. Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 8487–8492, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602138103 (2006).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Singh, M., Yau, Y. C. W., Wang, S., Waters, V. & Kumar, A. MexXY efflux pump overexpression and aminoglycoside resistance in cystic fibrosis isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from chronic infections. Can J Microbiol 63, 929–938, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2017-0380 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Campo Esquisabel, A. B., Rodriguez, M. C., Campo-Sosa, A. O., Rodriguez, C. & Martinez-Martinez, L. Mechanisms of resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa less susceptible to cefepime than to ceftazidime. Clin Microbiol Infect 17, 1817–1822, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03530.x (2011).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Greipel, L. et al. Molecular Epidemiology of Mutations in Antimicrobial Resistance Loci of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Airways of Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60, 6726–6734, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00724-16 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wei, Q. et al. Phenotypic and genome-wide analysis of an antibiotic-resistant small colony variant (SCV) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS One 6, e29276, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029276 (2011).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Matsuo, Y., Eda, S., Gotoh, N., Yoshihara, E. & Nakae, T. MexZ-mediated regulation of mexXY multidrug efflux pump expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by binding on the mexZ-mexX intergenic DNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 238, 23–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2004.07.010 (2004).

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Poole, K. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance to the max. Front Microbiol 2, 65, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00065 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lister, P. D., Wolter, D. J. & Hanson, N. D. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 22, 582–610, https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00040-09 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Guenard, S. et al. Multiple mutations lead to MexXY-OprM-dependent aminoglycoside resistance in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58, 221–228, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01252-13 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Prickett, M. H. et al. Aminoglycoside resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis results from convergent evolution in the mexZ gene. Thorax 72, 40–47, https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208027 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Doring, G. et al. Antibiotic therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: a European consensus. Eur Respir J 16, 749–767 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hansen, C. R., Pressler, T. & Hoiby, N. Early aggressive eradication therapy for intermittent Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway colonization in cystic fibrosis patients: 15 years experience. J Cyst Fibros 7, 523–530, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2008.06.009 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Alguel, Y., Lu, D., Quade, N., Sauter, S. & Zhang, X. Crystal structure of MexZ, a key repressor responsible for antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Struct Biol 172, 305–310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2010.07.012 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Morita, Y., Tomida, J. & Kawamura, Y. MexXY multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol 3, 408, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00408 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Clinical breakpoints, http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/ (2017).

  22. 22.

    Li, X. Z., Barre, N. & Poole, K. Influence of the MexA-MexB-oprM multidrug efflux system on expression of the MexC-MexD-oprJ and MexE-MexF-oprN multidrug efflux systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 46, 885–893 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hull, J., Vervaart, P., Grimwood, K. & Phelan, P. Pulmonary oxidative stress response in young children with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 52, 557–560 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Reen, F. J. et al. Aspirated bile: a major host trigger modulating respiratory pathogen colonisation in cystic fibrosis patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33, 1763–1771, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2133-8 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Smith, J. J., Travis, S. M., Greenberg, E. P. & Welsh, M. J. Cystic fibrosis airway epithelia fail to kill bacteria because of abnormal airway surface fluid. Cell 85, 229–236 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fraud, S. & Poole, K. Oxidative stress induction of the MexXY multidrug efflux genes and promotion of aminoglycoside resistance development in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55, 1068–1074, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01495-10 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kirchner, S. et al. Use of artificial sputum medium to test antibiotic efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in conditions more relevant to the cystic fibrosis lung. J Vis Exp e3857, https://doi.org/10.3791/3857 (2012).

  28. 28.

    Haagensen, J. A., Verotta, D., Huang, L., Spormann, A. & Yang, K. New in vitro model to study the effect of human simulated antibiotic concentrations on bacterial biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59, 4074–4081, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.05037-14 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gomez, J. E. et al. Ribosomal mutations promote the evolution of antibiotic resistance in a multidrug environment. Elife 6, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20420 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Imamovic, L. et al. Drug-Driven Phenotypic Convergence Supports Rational Treatment Strategies of Chronic Infections. Cell 172, 121–134 e114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.012 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Peano, C. et al. Gene and protein expression in response to different growth temperatures and oxygen availability in Burkholderia thailandensis. PLoS One 9, e93009, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093009 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Martinez-Garcia, E., Nikel, P. I., Chavarria, M. & de Lorenzo, V. The metabolic cost of flagellar motion in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ Microbiol 16, 291–303, https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12309 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wiegand, I., Hilpert, K. & Hancock, R. E. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc 3, 163–175, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.521 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Di Bonaventura, G., Ricci, E., Della Loggia, N., Catamo, G. & Piccolomini, R. Evaluation of the E test for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with long-term bladder catheterization. J Clin Microbiol 36, 824–826 (1998).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yang, L. et al. Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in a human host environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 7481–7486, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018249108 (2011).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cooper, V. S. & Lenski, R. E. The population genetics of ecological specialization in evolving Escherichia coli populations. Nature 407, 736–739, https://doi.org/10.1038/35037572 (2000).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    O’Toole, G. A. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J Vis Exp, https://doi.org/10.3791/2437 (2011).

  39. 39.

    Kuti, J. L., Dandekar, P. K., Nightingale, C. H. & Nicolau, D. P. Use of Monte Carlo simulation to design an optimized pharmacodynamic dosing strategy for meropenem. J Clin Pharmacol 43, 1116–1123, https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270003257225 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Touw, D. J., Knox, A. J. & Smyth, A. Population pharmacokinetics of tobramycin administered thrice daily and once daily in children and adults with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 6, 327–333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2006.12.007 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Heydorn, A. et al. Statistical analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development: impact of mutations in genes involved in twitching motility, cell-to-cell signaling, and stationary-phase sigma factor expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 2008–2017 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Katja Bloksted, Ulla Rydahl Johansen, Helle Nordbjerg Andersen, Sarah Buhr Bendixen, Camilla Thranow, Pia Poss, Bonnie Horsted Erichsen and Rakel Schiøtt for excellent technical assistance. We were also grateful for the acquisition of the oprM expression vector pXZL34 from Prof. Keith Poole. H.K.J. was supported by The Novo Nordisk Foundation as a clinical research stipend (NNF12OC1015920), by Rigshospitalets Rammebevilling 2015-17 (R88-A3537), by Lundbeckfonden (R167-2013-15229), by Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF15OC0017444) and by RegionH Rammebevilling (R144-A5287). S.M. is supported from Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability (CfB). Biotech-IgG A/S is thanked for providing the E-test at discount price.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.F.-M. performed all described experiments except for PD/PK flow chamber biofilms performed by J.A.J.H. and qPCR on the clinical strains performed by M.F. H.K.J. collected all the bacterial isolates and contributed to the conception and study design together with S.M., J.F.-M., E.R., J.A.J.H., M.F., and S.M. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. J.F.-M. drafted the manuscript and all authors commented on the manuscript prior to submission and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Søren Molin or Helle Krogh Johansen.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frimodt-Møller, J., Rossi, E., Haagensen, J.A.J. et al. Mutations causing low level antibiotic resistance ensure bacterial survival in antibiotic-treated hosts. Sci Rep 8, 12512 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30972-y

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.