Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

High Dose Vitamin D supplementation alters faecal microbiome and predisposes mice to more severe colitis

Abstract

Vitamin D has been suggested as a possible adjunctive treatment to ameliorate disease severity in human inflammatory bowel disease. In this study, the effects of diets containing high (D++, 10,000 IU/kg), moderate (D+, 2,280 IU/kg) or no vitamin D (D−) on the severity of dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) colitis in female C57Bl/6 mice were investigated. The group on high dose vitamin D (D++) developed the most severe colitis as measured by blinded endoscopic (p < 0.001) and histologic (p < 0.05) assessment, weight loss (p < 0.001), drop in serum albumin (p = 0.05) and increased expression of colonic TNF-α (p < 0.05). Microbiota analysis of faecal DNA showed that the microbial composition of D++ control mice was more similar to that of DSS mice. Serum 25(OH)D3 levels reduced by 63% in the D++ group and 23% in the D+ group after 6 days of DSS treatment. Thus, high dose vitamin D supplementation is associated with a shift to a more inflammatory faecal microbiome and increased susceptibility to colitis, with a fall in circulating vitamin D occurring as a secondary event in response to the inflammatory process.

Introduction

Vitamin D is recognized as a regulator of both innate and adaptive immune responses1, and vitamin D deficiency has been associated with the development of a number of immune mediated disorders including the inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

Several confounding factors, such as reduced sunlight exposure, low dietary intake and reduced intestinal absorption, limit the ability to draw conclusions about the causality of the observed link between vitamin D deficiency and active IBD. As a result, investigators have turned to mouse models of IBD such as the dextran sodium sulphate (DSS)-induced model of colitis2. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) knockout (KO), CYP27B1 KO, as well as dietary vitamin D-deficient mouse models are more susceptible to colitis3,4,5. In an IL-10-KO mouse model, which typically develop spontaneous colitis, administration of 1,25(OH)2D ameliorated the severity of colitis6. Thus, in select animal models, vitamin D deficiency increases susceptibility to colitis, and restoring vitamin D sufficiency may ameliorate colitis.

There are few studies exploring the effect of high vitamin D levels on immune regulation. Population studies describe a reverse ‘J’ or ‘U’ phenomenon where both vitamin D deficiency and high vitamin D are associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular specific mortality7,8,9. Higher vitamin D levels at birth have also been linked to the development of allergy10,11, and genetic analysis within these cohorts identify epigenetic changes in a number of genes including the thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) gene that may explain the immune mechanism for predisposition to allergy with elevated vitamin D levels12. The effect of higher vitamin D levels in clinical IBD or animal models of IBD have not been explored.

Vitamin D-related changes to gut microbiota are a possible mechanism for altering susceptibility to colitis. Vitamin D-deficient mice developed elevated bacterial counts in colonic tissue and greater susceptibility to DSS colitis3. Dietary-induced vitamin D deficiency alters the composition of the faecal microbiome of C57Bl/6 mice, with an increase in the relative quantities of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Gamma-Proteobacteria in naïve, non-colitic mice13. The effect of vitamin D on microbiota, however, is not limited to the gastrointestinal tract with an inverse correlation between circulating 25(OH)D levels and Pseudomonas operating taxonomic units (OTU) observed in the lungs of naïve female BALB/c mice14. Thus, vitamin D may regulate the microbiome at different sites and this could be due to its effect on innate immune responses, in particular the expression of antimicrobial peptides, such as the cathelicidins and β-defensins15.

The aim of this study was, therefore, to determine the effect of diets supplemented with high doses of vitamin D, compared to standard diets sufficient in vitamin D and diets deficient in vitamin D with no supplementation, on the susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis. Further, we sought to investigate the effect of different doses of vitamin D on the faecal microbiota and how this correlated with susceptibility to colitis.

Materials and Methods

Mice and Diet

Female 6 week-old C57Bl/6 mice were fed semi-pure diets supplemented with higher than usual doses of vitamin D (SF14-069, Specialty Feeds, Perth, Western Australia, 10,000 IU/kg vitamin D3, 0.5% calcium), standard doses of vitamin D to achieve vitamin D sufficiency similar to standard chow (SF05-34, Specialty Feeds, 2,280 IU/kg vitamin D3, 1% calcium) or no added vitamin D to induce vitamin D deficiency (SF05-033, Specialty Feeds, 0 IU/kg vitamin D3, 2% calcium). All experiments were performed according to the ethical guidelines of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia with the approval from the Telethon Kids Institute Animal Ethics Committee (AEC #276). Mice were purchased from the Animal Resources Centre, Western Australia.

Mice were housed under perspex-filtered fluorescent lighting, which emitted no detectable UVB radiation as measured using a UV radiometer (UVX Digital Radiometer, Ultraviolet Products Inc., Upland, CA, USA).

Colitis Model

After 4 weeks of being fed the respective diets, colitis was induced by the addition of DSS [3% (wt/vol)(MP Biomedicals LLC, OH)] to the drinking water for 6 days. Control mice received water without DSS. As the efficacy of DSS varies between batches, the experiments were conducted using the same batch16. In preliminary experiments, 3% DSS induced adequate colitis with peak weight loss ranging between 0.3% to 10.3% at day 7. Following induction of colitis, mice recovered over a period of 0–4 weeks without ongoing DSS treatment (Fig. 1). Mouse body weight was assessed daily during DSS treatment and weekly during recovery. The experiment was repeated, with a total of 35 mice per group. Mice were sacrificed at day 7, 14, 21 and 35.

Figure 1
figure1

The experimental approach. 6-week-old C57BL/6 female mice were fed diets with high (D++), moderate (D+) or no (D−) vitamin D3. (A) After 4 weeks of being fed the respective diets, mice were treated with DSS for 6 days to induce colitis, and then were maintained without DSS and continued their respective vitamin D diet until day 35. All mice underwent colonoscopy at day 6, and were sacrificed at day 7, 14, 21 or 35. An additional colonoscopy was performed on day 14, 21 or 35 when mice were sacrificed. (B) A control group of mice fed the three different diets followed the same protocol but were not treated with DSS and the day 21 timepoint is not included. The experiment was performed twice.

Murine colonoscopy

A high-resolution mouse video endoscopic system was used to assess the level of colitis. All mice were scoped on day 6 after commencing DSS treatment and then at the time of sacrifice. Mice were anaesthetised using isofluorane unless the colonoscopy was being performed at the end-point when ketamine 20 mg/ml and xylazine 2 mg/ml by intraperitoneal injection was used. All procedures were digitally recorded then scored in a blinded fashion. The experimental endoscopy setup consisted of a miniature endoscope (1.9 mm outer diameter), a xenon light source, a triple chip camera, and an air pump (Karl Storz, Germany) to achieve regulated inflation of the mouse colon.

The severity of colitis was determined using the modified ‘murine endoscopic index of colitis severity’ (MEICS)16,17. The MEICS system consists of 5 parameters: thickening of the colon wall, changes of the normal vascular pattern, presence of fibrin, mucosal granularity and stool consistency. Endoscopic grading was performed for each parameter (scored between 0 and 3) leading to a cumulative score of between 0 (no signs of inflammation) and 15 (endoscopic signs of severe inflammation). Healthy mice had a score of 0–3.

UV Radiation

For UV experiments, a bank of six 40 W lamps (Philips TL UV-B, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) emitting broadband UVR, 250–360 nm, with 65% of the output in the UVB range (280–315 nm), was used to irradiate mice and to deliver 1 kJ/m2 of UVR onto clean-shaven 8 cm2 dorsal skin. A new sheet of PVC plastic film (0.22 mm) was taped to the top of each Perspex cage immediately before irradiation to screen wavelengths <290 nm. Sunlamps were held 20 cm above the cages.

Histological Assessment of Colitis

Colons were removed with the rectum discarded as this has a different tissue fibro-structure. The distal 1 cm of colon was dissected, cleaned, formalin-fixed and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections were stained with haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E). All H&E sections were assessed blindly by a specialist gastroenterological histopathologist (CF) according to the scoring system by Dieleman et al.18. In this scoring system, the severity and depth of inflammation as well as the level of crypt damage and regeneration are scored.

Measurement of serum metabolites

At the time of sacrifice, blood was drawn by cardiac puncture. Levels of 25(OH)D3 were measured in the serum by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy (LC/MS/MS) (Centre for Metabolomics, UWA)19. Levels of 1,25(OH)2D3 were measured using IDS EIA ELISA kits (Immunodiagnostic Systems Ltd, Fountain Hills, AZ) as described by the manufacturer.

The serum vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) concentration was measured in duplicate using a Quantikine ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The results were verified by a radial immunodiffusion method as previously published20.

Serum calcium and albumin were measured by standard colorimetric reactions using the Architect c16000 Analyzer (Abbott Diagnositcs, Abbott Park, IL) by PathWest, Royal Perth Hospital, WA.

Serum cytokines were measured using Bio-Plex Pro™ Mouse Cytokine 23-plex panel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The cytokines analysed included interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12 p40, IL-12 p70, IL-13, IL-17, eotaxin (CCL11), G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, KC, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, RANTES and TNF-α.

Real-time PCR

Messenger RNA was extracted from snap-frozen colon, liver and kidney tissue with cDNA synthesised and real-time assays performed as previously described21. Real-time PCR primers were CYP27B1 cat # 301447280210/0&1, CYP24A1 cat # 3014472802-20/0&1, CYP2R1 cat # QT0005750 (Sigma-Aldrich co., St. Louis, MO), and for TNFα Qiagen Quantitect Primer Assay (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Housekeeping genes included elongation factor 1α (eEF1α) for kidney and liver tissue, TATA-box-binding protein for colonic tissue (Sigma-Aldrich co., St. Louis,MO). Quantitect SYBRGreen was used for qPCR on the AB17900HT instrument. Fold-change was determined by using the 2−∆∆Ct method.

Faecal Microbiota analysis

The faecal microbiome was analysed by sequencing the V3-V4 segment of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene using Illumina MiSeq chemistry. Faecal pellets were collected and stored at −20 °C. Bacterial DNA was extracted using the PowerSoil® DNA isolation kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA). PCR amplification (341F/806F primer pair) and sequencing was performed by the Australian Genome Research Facility on the Illumina MiSeq (San Diego, CA) with 2 × 300 bp paired-end chemistry. Paired-ends reads were assembled by aligning the forward and reverse reads using PEAR (version 0.9.5)22. Primers were trimmed using Seqtk (version 1.0)23. Trimmed sequences were processed using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME 1.8)24 USEARCH (version 7.1.1090)25,26 and UPARSE26 software. Using QIIME, taxonomy was assigned using Greengenes database (Version 13_8, Aug 2013)27.

The biom file, the OTU table, the taxonomic assignments and associated sample data were imported into R to create a phyloseq object. For all beta diversity analyses, OTUs for which the variance across all samples were very low, were filtered out. For testing a single categorical experimental condition, exact tests for differences in the means between two groups of negative-binomially distributed counts were computed. Data were normalized using the RLE scaling factor method and dispersions estimated. The counts were extracted and ranked by p-value, applying a false discovery rate cut-off of less than 0.001.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical significance was calculated using IBM® SPSS® Statistics Version 22 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY). All graphs and comparison of differences between groups were assessed using Student’s unpaired t-test or ANOVA with post hoc LSD analysis for multiple group analysis. Non-parametric data using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskall-Wallis testing. Microbiome statistical analysis was undertaken using the programming language R, specifically the phyloseq and edgeR packages available through Bioconductor, a project providing tools for the analysis and comprehension of high-throughput genomic DNA. LEfSe (Linear discriminant analysis effect size) was used to identify differentially abundant microbial taxa28.

Results

Vitamin D3 diets

Six-week-old C57Bl/6 female mice were fed diets with high (D++), moderate (D+) or no (D−) vitamin D3 for four weeks. At ten weeks of age, the mice in the three groups were not significantly different in weight (data not shown). D++ mice had significantly higher serum 25(OH)D3 compared to D+ mice which was in turn higher than D− (Table 1). The serum concentration of activated vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D3, was not significantly different between the D++ and D+ groups. As previously observed29, 1,25(OH)2D concentrations in the D− mice were lower than in the other groups, though this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.087). There was no difference in serum calcium levels between the three groups.

Table 1 Serum 25 (OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D and calcium levels after 5 weeks on vitamin D diets.

Vitamin D and DSS-induced colitis

Body weight loss and liquid stools were observed between 2–7 days after commencing the DSS treatment. All DSS-treated mice lost weight compared to pre-DSS measures. The peak percentage weight loss occurred at day 7 (Fig. 2A). At day 6 and 7, the D++ mice lost significantly more weight than D+ mice (p < 0.001), and at day 7 and 8, D− mice lost significantly more weight than D+ mice (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2A,B).

Figure 2
figure2

Outcomes of colitis. 6-week old female C57Bl/6 mice were established on diets with high (D++), moderate (D+) or no (D−) vitamin D3, before being treated with DSS for 6 days. Mice were regularly weighed and underwent colonoscopy procedures at regular intervals. (A) The percentage weight loss from baseline to day 10 post-DSS treatment. Comparisons are made to group D+ as the reference group. (B) Weight loss at day 7. (C) Endoscopic severity over time measured by murine endoscopic index of severity (MEICS). Comparisons are made to group D+ as the reference group. n = 35/group for day 6 and 7 assessments, n = 10/group day 14, n = 5/group for days 21 and 35. (D) Serum albumin at day 7, n = 5–10/group. (E) Colonic TNF-α gene expression after 6 days DSS treatment, fold change using the 2−ΔΔT method with TATA-box-binding protein as housekeeping gene, n = 4–5/group. Solid bars for control mice, open bars for DSS mice. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, from two experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

At the day 6 colonoscopy, control mice in all groups had solid stool, preserved mucosal vascularity, normal colonic translucency with a mean MEICS of 0.6 ± 0.17 (n = 23, range 0–3), consistent with no colitis (Fig. 2C). DSS-treated mice demonstrated endoscopic inflammation with loose stools, loss of intestinal wall translucency and mucosal bleeding with a mean MEICS 4.8 ± 0.2 (n = 102, range 0–10). This was significantly greater than control mice (p < 0.001, 95% CI 3.6–4.7).

At day 6, MEICS was significantly greater in D++ (6.3 ± 0.30, n = 33) than in the D+ (4.1 ± 0.30, n = 34, p < 0.001) and D− (3.9 ± 0.33, n = 35, p < 0.001) groups (Fig. 2C). There was no difference in colitis severity observed in mice from the D+ and D− groups (p = 0.65). At day 14, a higher MEICS was observed in the D++ group compared to the D+ group (p < 0.01), but this difference resolved by day 21 and 35 as recovery was almost complete (Fig. 2C).

The histological grading of colitis at the distal colon on day 14 was greater in mice from the D++ (8.22 ± 2.53, n = 9) than D+ (1.42 ± 0.57, n = 7, p < 0.05) or D− (1.43 ± 0.57, n = 8, p < 0.05) groups. At Day 7 there was a trend for higher inflammation in D++ and D− compared to D+ mice though this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.25) (Supplementary Fig. 1A,B). Among all groups, there was positive correlation between MEICS and day 7 weight loss (r = 0.60, n = 253, p < 0.001), day 7 histological score (r = 0.51, n = 86, p < 0.001) and day 14 histological score (r = 0.59, n = 56, p < 0.001) (data not shown).

At day 7, the mean serum albumin was less in all groups with colitis (Fig. 2D) than corresponding controls. Among DSS-treated mice, the mean albumin level was significantly lower among the D++, compared to the D+ (p < 0.05) and D− (p < 0.05) group, consistent with a worse colitis seen in the D++ group.

Gene expression of TNF-α in colon tissue by RT-PCR at day 7, was increased in all DSS-treated groups compared to controls. This was again greatest in the D++ group compared to D− (6.5 ± 3.1 vs 2.2 ± 0.36 fold, p < 0.05) with a trend to be greater than that measured in the D+ mice (4.1 ± 0.11, p = 0.08) (Fig. 2D).

Serum cytokines TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-6, IL-12p40 and IL-1β at day 7 were greater among all DSS mice compared to control mice (p < 0.05 for all cytokines, data not shown). When comparisons are stratified by vitamin D groups, the DSS group had higher levels than controls though this was not always statistically significant (Supplementary Fig. 2). IL-12p40 was highest among D++ compared to D− groups (p < 0.01), but similar changes were not seen with other cytokines (Supplementary Fig. 2).

25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D and VDBP concentrations

At day 7, serum 25(OH)D reduced by greater than 60% among DSS mice from the D++ group (Fig. 3A). This difference remained at day 35 (p = 0.053, n = 5). At day 7 a similar but smaller reduction in serum 25(OH)D levels was observed in the D+ group (Fig. 3B). Differences were not seen at the later time points. In mice from the D− group, given that 25(OH)D levels were already low at baseline, no reduction in 25(OH)D was detectable (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3
figure3

Vitamin D and vitamin D binding protein levels. Serum concentrations of 25(OH)D3 at day 7, 14 and 35 among DSS-treated mice and controls, (A) D++, (B) D+, (C) D−, n = 7–8/group at day 7 and day 14, n = 5/group at day 35. (D) 1,25(OH)2D and (E). Vitamin D binding protein concentrations in serum at day 7, n = 3–5/group. Solid bars for control mice, open bars for DSS mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, from at least two experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

As the large decrease in 25(OH)D may have been due to an increase in its conversion to 1,25(OH)2D, changes in the levels of 1,25(OH)2D were investigated. A significant decrease at day 7 in 1,25(OH)2D concentrations (relative to control mice), was detected in both the D++ and D+ groups suggesting that increased conversion was not the cause of 25(OH)D reductions (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3D).

As 25(OH)D, and to a lesser extent 1,25(OH)2D, are mostly bound to the VDBP, we questioned if the large decrease in both these vitamin D metabolites was due to a loss of VDBP. As described previously (Fig. 2D), serum albumin dropped with colitis. Surprisingly, the VDBP levels, measured by ELISA, increased with colitis in all groups and this was statistically significant in the D++ and D− groups (Fig. 3E). The increase in VDBP with DSS colitis was also seen when VDBP was measured by radial immunodiffusion, though this was significant among the D+ and D− group and there was a trend to significance among the D++ group (p = 0.076) (Supplementary Fig. 1C). These data suggest that the induction of colitis increases circulating VDBP levels.

Kidney CYP24A1 gene expression in DSS colitis

In an attempt to explain the reduced 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D at day 7 post-DSS treatment, changes in the level of expression of mRNA of enzymes involved in vitamin D metabolism were explored. Neither liver CYP2R1 nor kidney CYP27B1 mRNA levels changed significantly with the induction of colitis (Fig. 4A,B). There was 5.5 ± 1.3 fold more CYP24A1 mRNA in the kidneys of DSS-treated mice on D+ diets compared to their corresponding control group (p < 0.01) (Fig. 4C). Similarly, kidney CYP24A1 mRNA was expressed 4.3 ± 0.6 fold more among DSS-treated mice on D− diets compared to corresponding controls (p < 0.001). Kidney CYP24A1 was up-regulated 4.5 ± 0.9 fold among D++ controls compared to D+ controls (p < 0.05) as an appropriate homeostatic mechanism, but there was no further increase with the induction of colitis. Thus, increased kidney metabolism may help to explain the reduced 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D at day 7 in the D+ group, though a yet to be identified mechanism must exist to explain the drop in the D++ group.

Figure 4
figure4

Kidney Cyp24A1 gene expression is upregulated with DSS colitis. Female C57Bl/6 mice were established on three vitamin D diets for 4 weeks before treatment with DSS. On day 7 mice were sacrificed with livers and kidneys harvested to determine (A) Liver Cyp2R1, (B) Kidney Cyp 27B1, and (C). Kidney Cyp24A1 gene expression. mRNA gene expression by qtPCR was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method with eEF1α as the housekeeping gene, n = 5–10/group. Solid bars for control mice, open bars for DSS mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, from at least two experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

UV radiation-induced 25(OH)D and colitis

The reduced circulating levels of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D observed in mice with DSS-induced colitis could be caused by decreased intestinal absorption of vitamin D. If so, then 25(OH)D derived from skin exposed to UVB radiation should not fall with inflammation. To test this, mice fed vitamin D-deficient diets for 4 weeks were treated with daily UV radiation (1 kJ/m2) for 4 days followed by biweekly UV (1 kJ/m2) for the remainder of the experiment (D−UV+). After the 4 days of UV pretreatment, mice were treated with DSS for a further 6 days.

After 4 doses of UV irradiation, serum levels of 25(OH)D in mice from the D−UV+ treatment was 58.0 ± 2.49 nmol/L compared to 4.8 ± 0.15 nmol/L among D− mice without UV treatment (D−UV−) (n = 4/group, p < 0.001), Fig. 5A. The 25(OH)D concentrations among D−UV+ mice were similar to the D+ without UV treatment (D+UV−).

Figure 5
figure5

Serum levels of 25(OH)D3 in mice treated with and without UV radiation. The shaved dorsal surfaces of female C57Bl/6 mice on vitamin D deficient diets (D−) were irradiated with 1 kJ/m2 ultraviolet radiation daily for 4 days before undergoing DSS treatment. (A) 25(OH)D3 levels 24 h after four doses of UVB irradiation. (B) 25(OH)D levels after 6 days of DSS treatment in a separate group of mice. Solid bars control mice, open bars DSS mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, from two experiments. n = 4/group day 0 and n = 7–8/group day 7. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

After 6 days of DSS treatment, there was no significant difference in endoscopic severity of colitis between vitamin D-deficient mice (D−) exposed (UV+) or not exposed (UV−) to UV radiation (MEICS 4.3 ± 0.45 vs 3.9 ± 0.33, n = 35/gp, p = 0.42), nor was there a difference compared to D+UV− mice (MEICS 4.3 ± 0.45 vs 4.12 ± 0.45, n = 35/group, p = 0.64), Supplementary Fig. 1D. By day 7, the 25(OH)D (Fig. 5B) and 1,25(OH)2D concentrations (not shown) were significantly lower among UV-irradiated vitamin D-deficient, DSS-treated mice as compared to corresponding controls. Thus, these data suggest that the drop in circulating 25(OH)D in mice where vitamin D is acquired only through irradiation of the skin, cannot be due to malabsorption.

Effect of vitamin D on faecal microbiota

Microbiota analysis was performed on 42 faecal samples, comprised of 5 samples from each of the vitamin D groups among controls and DSS mice at day 7 and 4 samples per group among controls at day 35. One control mouse was considered an outlier and excluded from further analyses (Supplementary Fig. 3A).

Effect of Vitamin D on faecal microbiota from control, non-DSS mice

There were no differences seen in α-diversity as measured by species richness, evenness or Shannon’s diversity in day 7 samples collected from plain water-treated control mice, and the result was reproducible for day 35 samples (Fig. 6A, Supplementary Fig. 3B,C). Similarly, no significant differences in β-diversity were noted between day 7 and day 35 samples from control mice (data not shown). Further analysis was carried out only on day 7 samples.

Figure 6
figure6

Microbial composition of faecal samples from control mice. Faecal pellets were collected control mice from each of the vitamin D dietary groups (D++, D+ and D−). (A) Comparison of day 7 and day 35 species richness for samples from control mice (measured by chao1). (B) Day 7 Shannon’s diversity (H′). (C) Day 7, Relative abundance (%) of OTUs that correlated with serum vitamin D levels among controls using distance based linear modeling (DistLM) analysis. P-values calculated by PERMANOVA on Euclidean distance resemblance matrices generated from square root transformed relative abundance from each OTUs. n = 5/group for day 7 analyses, n = 4/group at day 35. *P < 0.05.

Comparisons between vitamin D groups found increasing vitamin D doses did not affect species richness as measured by chao1 among control mice (Fig. 6A), but it did reduce Shannon’s diversity between D++ controls compared to D− controls (Fig. 6B). No significant difference was noted between D− and D+ control groups; however, PERMANOVA analysis, a measure of global β-diversity, confirmed significant differences between D− and D++ controls (p = 0.012, t = 1.68, Permutations = 126) and D+ and D++ controls (P = 0.01, t = 1.76, Permutations = 126).

To examine the effect of vitamin D grouping on individual taxa, linear discriminant analysis (LEfSe) was performed. Forty microbial taxa at all taxonomic levels were found to be significantly different between the three vitamin D groups, of which 37 showed strong associations (linear discriminant analysis score > 3) (Supplementary Table Ia).

To determine the effect of measured serum 25(OH)D3 levels on individual taxa, correlation analysis was measured using distance based linear modelling (DistLM) analysis between serum 25(OH)D3 levels (Euclidean distance resemblance matrix) and relative abundances of microbial taxa. This identified a significant correlation with four taxa (>0.1% average relative abundance) which included: Paulidibacter|OTU46 (Pseudo-F: 4.6, P = 0.04, Df: 26); Bacteroidales|S24-7|OTU58 (Pseudo-F: 6.7, P = 0.02, Df: 26); Sutterella|OTU174 (Pseudo-F: 5.1, P = 0.038, Df: 26); and Coprococcus|OTU118 (Pseudo-F: 4.8, P = 0.02, Df: 26). To further inform our 25(OH)D3 correlation analyses and establish the response of these four taxa to vitamin D intake, the relative abundance of these four taxa across each vitamin D diet group were plotted (Fig. 6C). The relative abundance of Paulidibacter|OTU46, Bacteroidales|S24-7|OTU58, and Sutterella|OTU174 increased with vitamin D intake, while Coprococcus|OTU118 decreased.

Effect of DSS colitis on faecal microbiota

Treatment with DSS reduced the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) within samples analysed at day 7 from the D− (P = 0.09) and D+ (P = 0.04) but not D++ group relative to D− controls (not shown), but there was no significant difference between the DSS groups (Fig. 7A). DSS did not affect other measures of α-diversity, in particular species evenness and Shannon’s diversity (Fig. 7B, Supplementary Fig. 3D). However, DSS had a significant impact on overall microbial composition (β-diversity) at day 7 (Fig. 7C). Further, 111 microbial taxa at all taxonomic levels were found to be differentially abundant between controls and DSS mice using LEfSe analysis (Supplementary Table Ib). There was enrichment with DSS of disease-associated Proteobacteria and a reduction in taxa belonging to Firmicutes.

Figure 7
figure7

Microbial composition of faecal samples at Day 7 from DSS-treated mice. (A) Species richness (measured by chao1), n = 5/group. (B) Shannon’s diversity (H′), n = 5/group. (C) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot of the Bray-Curtis resemblance matrix following square-root transformation of relative abundance data showing the impact of DSS on the overall microbial composition, confirmed by pair-wise PERMANOVA (Control vs DSS): t = 3.34, p = 0.01, permutations = 999, n = 15/group (with and without nesting for vitamin D subgrouping). (D) Relative abundance (%) of Sutterella OTU174 between control and DSS mice (LDA 4.27, P < 0.0001), p-value derived from Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe), n = 15/group. (E) NMDS plot of the Bray-Curtis resemblance matrix following square-root transformation of relative abundance data demonstrating a significant shift of the control D++ microbial composition (green) towards that of the DSS group, n = 5/group. ***P < 0.001.

Notably, Sutterella OTU174 increased in relative abundance in DSS mice as compared to controls (LDA score: 4.27, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 7D, Supplementary Table Ia). This is relevant given similar rise of Sutterella in non-DSS treated controls from the D++ group, Fig. 6C, suggesting a shift in faecal microbiome of D++ controls to that of DSS mice. Further, when examining the overall microbiome composition there is a clear shift for D++ mice towards that of DSS mice (Fig. 7E).

Discussion

This is the first study to examine the effect of high dose vitamin D supplementation in an IBD model. High dose vitamin D supplementation led to more severe DSS colitis as measured by blinded endoscopic and histologic assessment, weight loss and fall in serum albumin.

The development of colitis was associated with an acute drop in serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D levels by a mean of 62% among the high vitamin D group and 23% among the vitamin D sufficient group. Other groups have demonstrated a drop in 1,25(OH)2D3 with DSS colitis but not in 25(OH)D35. This is most likely because the change in 25(OH)D3 was most apparent in the high vitamin D group where the baseline 25(OH)D3 level was significantly greater, this diet has not been examined in the prior studies of DSS colitis. The drop in 25(OH)D3 was associated with a greater than five-fold increase in gene expression of kidney CYP24A1 among D+ mice, an enzyme responsible for the catabolism of both 25 and 1,25(OH)2D. This suggests that vitamin D metabolites drops in response to inflammation. We did not observe this increase in kidney CYP24A1 expression in the D++ group which had the greatest drop in 25(OH)D, likely due to increased expression at baseline as a counter-regulatory mechanism to the higher 25(OH)D levels. An alternative mechanism must exist to explain the fall in vitamin D levels in this group. It is well established that 1,25(OH)2D can be produced by colonic epithelial cells30 and monocytes31, and this is also regulated by local CYP27B1 and CYP24A1. In fact, a study by Liu et al., demonstrated increased Cyp24A1 expression from the proximal, but not distal, colon with DSS colitis15. Thus, it is possible that with the colon inflammation, colonic epithelial cell and monocyte CYP24A1 expression is upregulated leading to the fall in serum 25(OH)D levels. The recovery of 25(OH)D3 was slow and did not return to baseline by day 35 in the D++ group despite resolution of colitis. This is likely due to this group having the greatest drop in 25(OH)D3, thus the time taken for 25(OH)D3 to return to baseline would be expected to take the longest even after the colitis has resolved.

In critical illness, reduced 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D levels have been observed, however this has been in association with reduced concentrations of the VDBP32. In our model we observed an increase in VDBP levels. While this could simply be a discrepancy between mouse and human vitamin D metabolism, it may also be unique to intestinal inflammation. In our previous work examining over 300 patients with CD in remission, high VDBP concentrations were independently associated with a 20% increased risk of subsequent clinical relapse of disease33. Thus, subclinical inflammation may lead to increased VDBP levels and subsequent disease flare. VDBP has an important role in actin scavenging such that in the case of acute tissue damage, cellular actin will bind plasma VDBP for subsequent rapid clearance of the complex34. It is possible that in response to intestinal tissue damage, VDBP was upregulated and thus is a biomarker of subclinical disease activity.

Contrary to previous animal studies, vitamin D deficiency did not predispose mice to worse colitis, though the measurement of colitis severity by endoscopy in this study differed to the clinical measurements reported in other studies. We did however observe transient weight loss and a trend for increased histological inflammation of the colon in the vitamin D-deficient group consistent with other reports. Previously reported rodents with increased susceptibility to DSS colitis have included vitamin D receptor- and Cyp27B1- KO mice. However, they had absolute vitamin D deficiency and numerous complicating skeletal abnormalities such that they may not be a good representation of the human condition4,5. Animal models of dietary-induced vitamin D deficiency better mimic clinical deficiency observed in humans; however, mixed results have been reported in these vitamin D deficient mice3,35.

Serum cytokines, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-6, IL-12p40 and IL-1β, increased with the induction of DSS colitis, and is consistent with previous work from our group16. No differences were seen in serum cytokine levels between the different vitamin D groups, with the exception of IL-12p40 which was higher among colitic mice from the D++ group compared to the vitamin D-deficient group. It is possible that other cytokine levels reached a plateau level in all DSS groups, making it impossible to detect differences between the different vitamin D dietary groups. We have previously reviewed the effect of vitamin D supplementation in-vivo and in-vitro on innate and adaptive immune cells responses, particularly with respect to gastrointestinal inflammation36. In summary, vitamin D supplementation can have favourable effects in preserving intestinal epithelial barrier function, production of anti-microbial peptides, attenuating capacity for antigen presentation, reducing dendritic cell maturation and T-cell proliferation. The effect of different doses of vitamin D on these responses was not examined in this study, but it would be important in future work to identify those responses that reversed with high vitamin D supplementation.

The mechanism by which high dose vitamin D supplementation increased colitis susceptibility remains unclear, but we did observe that vitamin D had a potent effect on the microbial composition of faeces from plain-water treated, control mice. Interestingly, the microbial composition of faeces from D++ control mice approached that of DSS mice, suggesting a shift to a more pro-inflammatory microbiome even before starting DSS treatment. Some of the changes seen across vitamin D categories were confirmed by correlation with serum 25(OH)D3 levels. Most notably there was a consistent increase in Sutterella spp. This same organism was also enriched in mice with colitis. Sutterella spp. have been reported to be enriched in human subjects with inflammatory bowel diseases37 and a recent study of faecal microbiota transplantation in ulcerative colitis found recipients with increases in Sutterella spp. were consistently less likely to respond to the treatment38. Similarly, the group Bacteroidales S24-7 showed a strong positive correlation with 25(OH)D3 levels but was depleted in the DSS mice. It is possible that the significant bloom in this taxon in D++ mice impacts microbiome stability and, in turn, susceptibility to the effects of DSS, thus potentially predisposing these mice to more severe colitis.

It remains unclear if the observed changes in faecal microbiota are a direct response to changes in vitamin D, or mediated indirectly through changes in mucosal immune responses. While our findings demonstrate an association between vitamin D dosing, faecal microbiota changes and susceptibility to colitis, we acknowledge that a specifically designed study would be needed to draw definitive conclusions about cause and effect.

In conclusion, high dose vitamin D worsens the severity of murine colitis induced by DSS, and is associated with distinct changes in microbial composition that may be a direct dietary effect or as a result of dysregulation of the gut mucosal immune response. Future work needs to further explore the effects of high levels of vitamin D on gut mucosal immunity to better understand if high as well as low vitamin D levels lead to a dysregulation.

References

  1. 1.

    Ghaly, S. & Lawrance, I. The role of vitamin D in gastrointestinal inflammation. Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2014.925796 (2014).

  2. 2.

    Okayasu, I. et al. A novel method in the induction of reliable experimental acute and chronic ulcerative colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 98, 694–702 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lagishetty, V. et al. Vitamin D deficiency in mice impairs colonic antibacterial activity and predisposes to colitis. Endocrinology 151, 2423–2432, https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2010-0089 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ooi, J. H., Li, Y., Rogers, C. J. & Cantorna, M. T. Vitamin d regulates the gut microbiome and protects mice from dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. J Nutr 143, 1679–1686, https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.113.180794 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Liu, N. et al. Altered endocrine and autocrine metabolism of vitamin D in a mouse model of gastrointestinal inflammation. Endocrinology 149, 4799–4808, https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2008-0060 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cantorna, M. T., Munsick, C., Bemiss, C. & Mahon, B. D. 1,25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol prevents and ameliorates symptoms of experimental murine inflammatory bowel disease. J Nutr 130, 2648–2652 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Melamed, M. L., Michos, E. D., Post, W. & Astor, B. 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and the risk of mortality in the general population. Archives of internal medicine 168, 1629–1637, https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1629 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jia, X., Aucott, L. S. & McNeill, G. Nutritional status and subsequent all-cause mortality in men and women aged 75 years or over living in the community. The British journal of nutrition 98, 593–599, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114507725163 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Visser, M., Deeg, D. J. H., Puts, M. T. E., Seidell, J. C. & Lips, P. Low serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in older persons and the risk of nursing home admission. The American journal of clinical nutrition 84, 616–622; quiz 671-612 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Weisse, K. et al. Maternal and newborn vitamin D status and its impact on food allergy development in the German LINA cohort study. Allergy 68, 220–228, https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12081 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Miyake, Y., Tanaka, K., Okubo, H., Sasaki, S. & Arakawa, M. Maternal consumption of dairy products, calcium, and vitamin D during pregnancy and infantile allergic disorders. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 113, 82–87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2014.04.023 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Junge, K. M. et al. Increased vitamin D levels at birth and in early infancy increase offspring allergy risk-evidence for involvement of epigenetic mechanisms. J Allergy Clin Immunol 137, 610–613, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.040 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Assa, A. et al. Vitamin D deficiency promotes epithelial barrier dysfunction and intestinal inflammation. J Infect Dis 210, 1296–1305, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiu235 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Roggenbuck, M. et al. Vitamin D and allergic airway disease shape the murine lung microbiome in a sex-specific manner. Respir Res 17, 116, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-016-0435-3 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lagishetty, V. et al. 1alpha-hydroxylase and innate immune responses to 25-hydroxyvitamin D in colonic cell lines. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology 121, 228–233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.02.004 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ng, Y.-L. et al. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) exacerbates colonic inflammatory symptoms in dextran sodium sulphate-induced murine colitis. PLoS One 8, e77575, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077575 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Becker, C. et al. In vivo imaging of colitis and colon cancer development in mice using high resolution chromoendoscopy. Gut 54, 950–954, https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2004.061283 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dieleman, L. A. et al. Chronic experimental colitis induced by dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) is characterized by Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Clin Exp Immunol 114, 385–391 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Clarke, M. W., Tuckey, R. C., Gorman, S., Holt, B. & Hart, P. H. Optimized 25-hydroxyvitamin D analysis using liquid–liquid extraction with 2D separation with LC/MS/MS detection, provides superior precision compared to conventional assays. Metabolomics 9, 1031–1040, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-013-0518-9 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bouillon, R., van Baelen, H. & de Moor, P. The measurement of the vitamin D-binding protein in human serum. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 45, 225–231, https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-45-2-225 (1977).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gorman, S., Judge, M. A. & Hart, P. H. Topical 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 subverts the priming ability of draining lymph node dendritic cells. Immunology 131, 415–425, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03315.x (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhang, J., Kobert, K., Flouri, T. & Stamatakis, A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 30, 614–620, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li, H. GIT Hub, https://github.com/lh3/seqtk (2016).

  24. 24.

    Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature methods 7, 335–336, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 5069–5072, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 12, R60, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gorman, S. & Hart, P. H. The current state of play of rodent models to study the role of vitamin D in UV-induced immunomodulation. Photochem Photobiol Sci 11, 1788–1796, https://doi.org/10.1039/c2pp25108f (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lechner, D., Kallay, E. & Cross, H. S. 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 downregulates CYP27B1 and induces CYP24A1 in colon cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 263, 55–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2006.08.009 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rook, G. A. et al. Vitamin D3, gamma interferon, and control of proliferation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by human monocytes. Immunology 57, 159–163 (1986).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Van den Berghe, G. et al. Bone turnover in prolonged critical illness: effect of vitamin D. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 88, 4623–4632, https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030358 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ghaly, S. et al. High Vitamin D-Binding Protein Concentration, Low Albumin, and Mode of Remission Predict Relapse in Crohn’s Disease. Inflammatory bowel diseases 22, 2456–2464, https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000894 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Speeckaert, M. M., Speeckaert, R., van Geel, N. & Delanghe, J. R. Vitamin D binding protein: a multifunctional protein of clinical importance. Adv Clin Chem 63, 1–57 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Liu, T. et al. Vitamin D treatment attenuates 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis but not oxazolone-induced colitis. Scientific reports 6, 32889, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32889 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ghaly, S. & Lawrance, I. The role of vitamin D in gastrointestinal inflammation. Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology 8, 909–923, https://doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2014.925796 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Santoru, M. L. et al. Cross sectional evaluation of the gut-microbiome metabolome axis in an Italian cohort of IBD patients. Scientific reports 7, 9523, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10034-5 (2017).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Paramsothy, S. et al. Multidonor intensive faecal microbiota transplantation for active ulcerative colitis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 389, 1218–1228, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30182-4 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Michael Clarke, Centre of Metabolomics, University of Western Australia for performing the vitamin D analyses, Dr. Mario Taranto, Pathwest, Royal Perth Hospital, WA, Australia for performing calcium and albumin analysis. NOK acknowledges support from the Cancer Institute NSW. SG acknowledges support from GESA-Ferring IBD Clinician Establishment Award 2015.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.H.H. and S.G. conceived and conducted the experiments, data analysis and drafting of manuscript. I.C.L. conceived experiment. R.B., F.L., T.M., D.M., A.B., B.K., S.Go. and C.F. conducted experimental work. N.O.K. and L.G. performed data analysis. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Ghaly.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghaly, S., Kaakoush, N.O., Lloyd, F. et al. High Dose Vitamin D supplementation alters faecal microbiome and predisposes mice to more severe colitis. Sci Rep 8, 11511 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29759-y

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing