Abstract
We have investigated the rotating magnetocaloric effect (RMCE) of TmB_{4}  an anisotropic magnetic system with geometrical frustration of ShastrySutherland type. The RMCE was obtained from detailed temperature dependencies of heat capacity in various magnetic fields of a single crystalline sample for crystal axes orientations c  B and c ⊥ B. The received results exhibit rather complex distributions of positive and negative entropy ΔS(T, B) and temperature ΔT(T, B) differences below and above T_{N} when the direction of the magnetic field changes between directions c  B and c ⊥ B. The calculated results were confirmed by direct RMCE measurements which, moreover, show an interesting angular dependence of RMCE in the ordered phase, which seems to be related with the change of the effective magnetic field along the c axis during sample rotation. Thus, our study presents a new type of magnetic refrigerant with a rather large RMCE for low temperature magnetic refrigeration, and points to further interesting magnetic features in the ordered phase of this frustrated system.
Introduction
The magnetocaloric effect (MCE) represents a magnetothermodynamic phenomenon in which the temperature variation in magnetic material is caused by the change of external magnetic field^{1,2,3,4,5}. It was also shown that geometrical spin frustration can significantly enhance the change of magnetic entropy in applied magnetic field and thus intensify the MCE^{6,7}. On the MCE based magnetic refrigeration has attracted considerable attention as an alternative way of cooling, above all due to its energy efficiency and environmentally friendly way in comparison to conventional gas compressionexpansion refrigeration. In order to improve the application possibilities of magnetic refrigeration, recently a novel rotating magnetocaloric effect (RMCE) has been proposed and investigated^{1,8,9,10,11,12,13,14}. In this case the MCE can be obtained by simply rotating the magnetic refrigerant in constant field instead of moving it in and out of the magnet. This rotary magnetic refrigeration can be used in case of strongly anisotropic magnetic materials and it seems to offer advantages in comparison with its conventional counterpart as it appears to be from the technical point of view more simple and compact.
In our contribution we present results of RMCE investigations carried out on thulium tetraboride (TmB_{4}), an anisotropic geometrically frustrated magnetic system. TmB_{4} belongs to the group of rare earth tetraborides (REB_{4}) that crystallize in a tetragonal lattice^{15,16}. As one of the three valence electrons of RE^{3+} ions goes to the conduction band, these tetraborides are good metals and the RKKY exchange interaction between magnetic ions is playing an important role. In case of TmB_{4} the magnetic Tm^{3+} ions have a 4f^{12} configuration with an angular momentum J = 6. In the mentioned tetragonal lattice the Tm ions lie in sheets perpendicular to the caxis and can be within this (ab) plane mapped onto the frustrated ShastrySutherland lattice, which can be viewed in terms of squares and equilateral triangles^{17,18,19,20,21}. Between these Tm sheets there are planes of boron atoms grouped into B_{6} octahedra and dimer pairs. Crystal field effects at Tm^{3+} sites lift the degeneracy of the J = 6 multiplet. Consequently the ground state is a doublet M_{J} = ±6 which induces a strong Isinglike magnetic anisotropy with magnetic moments of Tm ions oriented along the caxis below its Néel temperature T_{N} = 11.7 K. In the ordered antiferromagnetic state the magnetization M for magnetic fields B  c reaches saturation M_{S} at about 4 T accompanied by magnetization plateaus at 1/2 M_{S} and 1/8 M_{S}. On the other hand, for fields B ⊥ c the saturation of M is reached only at fields above 30 T. From this it follows that in magnetic fields up to about 4 T the magnetization along the caxis is considerably higher than this in the perpendicular direction which is advantageous for the emergence of the RMCE. Further details about the magnetic structure and other properties of TmB_{4} and related magnetic tetraborides^{22,23,24,25,26,27,28}, as well as about the current theoretical approaches can be found elsewhere^{29,30,31,32,33}.
Thus, TmB_{4} appears to be an interesting anisotropic frustrated magnetic system which literally invites to investigate its magnetocaloric properties, especially in the rotation version.
To study the RMCE usually magnetization field dependencies M(B, T_{0}) at various temperatures T_{0} for two perpendicular orientations (e.g. for c  B and c ⊥ B) are measured, on the base of which the entropy difference ΔS(T, B) related with these two orientations is calculated (see e.g. ref.^{9}). According to ΔS the corresponding adiabatic temperature change ΔT(T, B), which denotes the temperature difference between the state with lower entropy (in case of TmB_{4} for B  c) and this with a higher entropy (for TmB_{4} when B ⊥ c) can be estimated. In this method, however, usually a constant heat capacity of the investigated material is used, which can often lead to considerable errors in the ΔT estimation. Therefore, in our case the RMCE investigation of TmB_{4} was based on detailed heat capacity C(T, B_{0}) measurements in a wide T and B range (for directions B  c and B ⊥ c) from which the entropy difference ΔS and temperature ΔT were calculated using the method described in ref.^{34}. The received results were verified experimentally by direct ΔT_{exp}(T, B) measurements, and analyzed and interpreted by complementary angulardependent magnetization measurements.
Materials and Methods
Single crystals of TmB_{4} were grown by an inductive, cruciblefree zone melting method. The residual resistivity ratio of investigated samples was larger than 100, documenting their high quality. For heat capacity experiments an oriented sample with approximate dimension 1 × 1 × 0.5 mm^{3} was cut. The same sample, or a part of it, was used also for other measurements performed within this work. C(T, B) measurements in the temperature range 2–60 K and in magnetic field up to 4.8 T were performed using a commercial Quantum Design PPMS system with a builtin relaxation method. For every experimental point the temperature and magnetic field were fixed. From C(T, B) results the entropy ΔS and temperature ΔT changes were determined. To measure ΔT_{exp}(T, B) (and its angular dependence) directly, a special homemade rotary calorimeter was constructed (a more detailed description of the calorimeter can be found in part “Rotating magnetocaloric effect of TmB_{4}”). Because of the high magnetic anisotropy of TmB_{4} and from this resulting (especially in high magnetic fields) large torque τ = M × B, where M denotes the magnetization, the sample (a relatively large one ∼10 mg, to receive a high ΔT signal) was fixed to the calorimeter by means of a bulky amount of glue (GE Varnish). The rather robust (6 × 6 × 0.3 mm^{3}) sapphire calorimeter equipped with a ruthenium oxide thermometer was fixed to the temperature stabilized platform by four fishing lines (ϕ ≈ 0.1 mm). The corresponding measurements were performed in a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) equipped with a rotator option. Measurements of the empty (without sample) calorimeter with glue have shown that its total heat capacity below 20 K is about 10 times bigger than that of the investigated sample which led to the fact that the experimentally observed ΔT_{exp} values appear to be considerably smaller than those calculated (and expected) from above mentioned heat capacity measurements. The associated angular dependence of magnetization at various temperatures and magnetic fields was determined by a horizontal sample rotator option (M101C) of the Quantum Design Magnetic Property Measurement System (MPMS) which enabled to rotate the TmB_{4} sample with respect to magnetic field orientation.
Anisotropy of TmB_{4} above T _{N}
To study the RMCE of TmB_{4}, it is necessary to know the anisotropy of its magnetic properties in the paramagnetic state above T_{N}. In Fig. 1a the angular dependencies of magnetization M(φ) at various temperatures is displayed. As can be seen, these dependencies are harmonic/sinusoidal with maxima at φ = 0° (when c  B) and minima at φ = 90° (when c ⊥ B, in fact c ⊥ B corresponds in our case always to (110) direction). At T = 13.5 K and B = 4.6 T the ratio between the maximum M_{max} (c  B) and minimum M_{min} (c ⊥ B) has a value of M_{max}/M_{min} ≈ 50! This very high value confirms that TmB_{4} is strongly anisotropic also in the paramagnetic phase, above all close above T_{N}, and that this material should be suitable for its use in rotating magnetic calorimetry. On the other hand, the high anisotropy also shows that in TmB_{4} (at least close above T_{N}) are the magnetic moments of Tm ions factually exclusively oriented parallel to the c  axis. Therefore, it can be assumed that sample rotation in magnetic field (which is equivalent to field rotation with respect to the sample) causes only a change of the field amplitude along the c  direction (see Fig. 1b). In such a case the field along the c  direction is B_{ceff} = B.cosφ, where φ is the angle between the applied field B and the c  axis during rotation. Thus, the highest magnetisation in this anisotropic system is observed when B  c (φ = 0°) and the lowest one when B ⊥ c (φ = 90°). With increase of temperature the M_{max}/M_{min} ratio gradually decreases (see Fig. 1a) which points to the fact that the RMCE is most pronounced in the temperature region not too far above T_{N}.
Rotating magnetocaloric effect of TmB_{4}
The obtained results of the temperature dependencies of heat capacity in various magnetic fields C(T, B_{0}) for field orientations B  c and B ⊥ c (for both orientations the same sample was used) are shown in Fig. 2. In this case the C(T, B_{0}) dependencies were measured starting from the highest temperature towards the lowest, then the sample was warmed up quickly back to the highest temperature and subsequently the field was changed (increased). Whereas for B ⊥ c are the C(T, B_{0}) dependencies in fields up to 4.8 T (within the measurement error) practically identical, for B  c pronounced field dependent changes were observed (see Fig. 2) which is in accordance with magnetization measurements on this compound (see e.g. refs^{17,18}). The corresponding BT phase diagrams received from C(T, B_{0}) dependencies, which agree with those based on magnetization measurements^{17,18}, are shown as inserts of Fig. 2 (the higher “B” values of phase boundaries in phase diagrams are associated with the fact that in this case the demagnetization factor of the used sample was not taken into account, the reason is related to further experiments in which the sample was rotated). The reason why the C(T, B_{0}) measurements were performed only up to 4.8 T was associated with the fact that above this value the torque acting on the sample (fixed on calorimeter) already started to rotate it (or tear it from the calorimeter).
Based on these C(T, B_{0}) dependencies corresponding entropy dependencies S(T, B) for both directions (B  c and B ⊥ c) have been calculated using the relation (1):
To perform these calculations from T = 0 a linear extrapolation of heat capacity towards zero temperature was used, and the entropy at T = 0 was for all fields and sample orientations set to zero. But it was also shown that if the linear extrapolation of C(T, B_{0}) dependencies below 2 K was replaced by a realistic Schottky contribution coming from thulium nuclei which was in detail down to 20 mK investigated in ref.^{35}, the obtained S(T, B) differences at T > 3 K were irrelevant. The calculated distributions of entropy are shown in Fig. 3. Note that even if the entropy calculation (see eq. 1) smoothes the heat capacity anomalies, the layout of entropy for B  c displays rather well the BT phase diagram of TmB_{4} for this direction.
The difference between entropies ΔS for B  c and for B ⊥ c is shown in Fig. 4a. It exhibits a “heating” hill in the ordered phase with a summit around 9 K and a wide “cooling” depression in the paramagnetic phase around 15 K which is deepening with the increase of magnetic field. Based on received S(T, B) distributions for B  c and for B ⊥ c (Fig. 3) the corresponding temperature change ΔT between directions B  c and B ⊥ c can be determined. We would like to note that in the case when S distributions are calculated from magnetization data the corresponding ΔT is usually estimated using a constant (average) heat capacity C(T, B) value, which can lead to significant errors if the heat capacity in the particular region changes markedly (see Fig. 2). These errors can be avoided if entropy calculations are based on heat capacity measurements. In this case, the isentropic temperature difference ΔT(T, B) for every (T, B) point can be calculated using the relation (2):
where T_{B⊥c}(B, S) and T_{B c}(B, S) are the temperatures at a certain (B, S) point (based on Fig. 3) which has the same B and S values both for the B ⊥ c and the B  c orientations (e.g. at starting point for B  c, B = 4.5 T and T_{B c} = 15 K the entropy is S = 3.58 JK^{−1} mol^{−1}, after adiabatic rotation in the same field to B ⊥ c the final temperature is T_{B⊥ c} = 11.5 K, i.e. ΔT ≈ −3.5 K). The resulting ΔT(T, B) dependence is illustrated in Fig. 4b. Even if the ΔT(T, B) dependence is similar to the ΔS one, due to the marked C(T, B_{0}) distribution is the ΔT layout different. It exhibits a large cooling region above T_{N} (around 20 K and in fields above 2 T) in which the temperature of TmB_{4} during the same rotation decreases by more than 9 K (this cooling procedure is analogous to the conventional demagnetisation process in the paramagnetic region). But, there is also a positive (warming up) area below T_{N} (around 5 K at 1.8 T and 4.2 T) where the temperature increases by more than 2.5 K when the sample is rotated from B  c to B ⊥ c and which is related with heating at magnetic reversal in the ordered state. These results thus exhibit an interesting and rather peculiar RMCE distribution in this strongly anisotropic frustrated metallic system. Moreover, our results show that estimations of the magnetocaloric effect based on magnetization data (and on an usually average heat capacity value) can lead to inaccuracies in ΔT determination, especially at the ordering temperature where heat capacity anomalies occur. However, this does not apply to the main MCE cooling region above T_{N}.
The relevant refrigerant capacity (RC) was estimated according to refs^{9,34} using the expression:
where T_{1} and T_{2} are the temperatures corresponding to sides of the halfmaximum ΔS peak value. For TmB_{4} the “heating” refrigerant capacity for the positive ΔS peaks at B = 1.8 T and 4.2 T is RC ≈ 37.20 J/kg and 32.02 J/kg, respectively. On the other hand the “cooling” refrigerant capacity for the negative ΔS depression at B = 4.6 T is RC ≈ 87.51 J/kg, which is comparable with values of other RMCE materials (see e.g. ref.^{9}).
In order to verify our predictions based on C(T, B) measurements we have performed direct RMCE measurements using a rotary calorimeter. The distribution of the experimentally obtained temperature difference ΔT_{exp}(T, B) is displayed in Fig. 5 (ΔT_{exp}(T, B) represents the temperature change of the system “sample plus calorimeter”). This distribution is similar to that of ΔT(T, B) in Fig. 4b (determined from heat capacity measurements). The differences between absolute values of ΔT_{exp}(T, B) and ΔT(T, B) are associated with the rather large heat capacity of the rotary calorimeter used for determination of ΔT_{exp}(T, B) (as mentioned in section Materials and methods, the heat capacity of the calorimeter was about 10 times larger than this of the used sample). On the other hand, the difference between ΔT_{exp}(T, B) and ΔT(T, B) layouts (e.g. the cooling minimum of ΔT_{exp}(T, B) is observed at lower temperatures than this of ΔT(T, B)) is most probably associated with the fact that the sharp C(T, B) changes near T_{N} (Fig. 2) which determine the ΔT(T, B) values, are in case of ΔT_{exp}(T, B) estimation (due to the rather large heat capacity of the rotary calorimeter) considerably reduced.
Results of the detailed angular dependence of direct RMCE investigations (i.e. measurements of ΔT_{exp}(φ, T, B)) using the homemade calorimeter, which allowed to rotate the TmB_{4} sample smoothly between c  B and c ⊥ B, are for various magnetic fields shown in Fig. 6. Above T_{N} (e.g. at 13.5 K) such a rotation leads (as expected) to continuous cooling which intensifies with increasing field. However, the angular dependence of RMCE below T_{N} (e.g. at 5 K) shows a rather complex behaviour, especially in higher magnetic fields. As can be seen, with increasing φ the heating process (due to magnetic reversal) is not monotonous, and except the expected peak at φ = 90° (when the sample was rotated from B  c to B ⊥ c) it exhibits an anomaly also around φ ≈ 60°. The reason for this observation is discussed in the next section.
Special magnetic features of TmB_{4} below T _{N}
To investigate the observed heating anomaly of RMCE (at φ ≈ 60°) in the ordered state more in detail, angular dependent magnetization measurements at temperatures below T_{N} and in various magnetic fields were performed. Under these conditions M(φ) does not anymore exhibit a sinusoidal dependence when the sample is rotated from φ = 0° (c  B) to φ = 90° (c ⊥ B), but a rather complicated course (see Fig. 7a) which depends both on magnetic field and temperature. Nevertheless, also in this case the angular dependence shows their maxima at φ = 0° and minima at φ = 90°. At T = 2 K and B = 4.6 T the ratio between the magnetisation maximum M_{c} and minimum M_{a} has a value of M_{max}/M_{min} ≈ 40. This value confirms the very high anisotropy of TmB_{4} in the ordered phase^{17}. Due to this (as in the paramagnetic phase) also in the ordered phase one can be expect that in TmB_{4} are the magnetic moments in fields up to 5 T are exclusively oriented parallel with the c axis. Therefore, it can be by analogy (as in the paramagnetic phase) assumed that the sample rotation in magnetic field manifests itself as a B_{ceff} = B.cosφ change of the field along the c  direction (see Fig. 1b). In this way, e.g. at 5 K and in magnetic field of 5 T, during rotation from φ = 0° to φ = 90° the magnetic field gradually passes through all ordered magnetic phases of TmB_{4}, the half plateau (ferrimagnetic) phase, the fractional plateau phase and the Néel phase (detailed information about magnetic phases of TmB_{4} can be found e.g. in refs^{19,24}). On the other hand, taking into account the observed very large anisotropy in the ordered phase, it appears surprising that complex structures are expected to arise at magnetic domain walls as suggested in ref.^{24}.
Taking into account the above suggestion that upon rotation the effective field B_{ceff} along the c axis changes, the experimentally observed angular dependences of RMCE in the ordered phase (Fig. 6b) can be linked with the isentropic course of entropy S_{c} (Fig. 3a, see the course indicated by arrows). Starting e.g. with S_{c} at T = 5 K, B = 4.6 T and reducing B_{ceff} along the line S_{c} = const., one can see two repeating cooling (blue arrows) and two heating intervals (red arrows), which is in agreement with ΔT_{exp}(φ, B) behaviour in Fig. 6b (if one at 4.6 T changes φ from 0° to 90°). The same applies for T = 5 K, B = 3 T where one cooling and one heating interval can be observed, etc. But, on the other hand, this method of ΔT estimation in Fig. 3a cannot be straightforwardly applied also at higher temperatures, e.g. above T_{N}. The reason is that changes of ΔT_{exp}(φ, B) in Fig. 6b are changes in the system “sample plus calorimeter”, whereas Fig. 3a shows entropy distributions (and related ΔT changes) of the sample only. And, as the heat capacity of the dielectric calorimeter depends on temperature as ∼T^{3}, it can be expected that conclusions and comparisons based on Figs 3a and 6b will diverge with increasing T.
However, one has to take into account that upon sample rotation and the corresponding field change of B_{ceff} also the magnetic structure itself within relevant magnetic phases may change. Thus, e.g. in the half plateau (ferrimagnetic) phase with the decrease of B_{ceff} not all magnetic moments will remain oriented in the field direction, but a part of them will start to flip and point into the opposite direction. And this applies probably also for the fractional plateau phase. This fact is reflected e.g. in field dependencies of magnetisation at various φ angles (Fig. 7b). There one can see that with increasing angle φ not only the fractional plateau phase and half plateau phases become (as expected) shifted to higher B (as the field along c  direction changes as B_{ceff} = B.cosφ, higher fields are needed to reach the plateaus), but also the values of magnetization magnitudes in plateau regions become reduced (as a result of increasing spin flips in the opposite direction). These results point to further interesting magnetic features in the ordered phase of this anisotropic frustrated system, and it will be interesting to investigate e.g. how the phase diagram and the plateaus will change depending on angle φ.
Conclusions
We have shown that TmB_{4} exhibits very strong magnetic anisotropy both in the ordered as well as in the nonordered/paramagnetic phase. Based on this fact and on detailed temperature dependencies of heat capacity in various magnetic fields C(T, B_{0}) for crystal axes orientations c  B and c ⊥ B we have determined the RMCE of TmB_{4}  a magnetic system with a geometrical frustration of ShastrySutherland type. The received RMCE results exhibit a significant cooling effect above T_{N} and a rather complex ΔT distributions of cooling and heating below T_{N}. These results were confirmed experimentally by direct ΔT_{exp} measurements which have in addition shown an interesting angular RMCE dependence in the ordered phase. As angledependent magnetization measurements just above and below T_{N} have shown, are the magnetic moments in TmB_{4} oriented only parallel to the c  axis. Therefore, it can be assumed that the sample rotation in magnetic field manifests itself as a change of the field amplitude along c  direction. From this follows that the experimentally observed angular dependencies of RMCE in the ordered phase can be explained by transitions through different magnetic phases upon sample rotation. Thus, our study shows TmB_{4} as an interesting anisotropic system with geometrical frustration which is suitable for RMCE at low temperatures. Moreover, results in the ordered phase point to further interesting questions related e.g. to the angular dependence of its magnetic properties.
References
 1.
Kuzmin, M. D. & Tishin, A. M. Magnetic refrigerants for the 4.2–20 K region: garnets or perovskites. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 24, 2039 (1991).
 2.
Tegus, O., Brück, E., Buschow, K. H. J. & de Boer, F. R. Transitionmetalbased magnetic refrigerants for roomtemperature applications. Nature 415, 150 (2002).
 3.
Provenzano, V., Shapiro, A. J. & Shull, R. D. Reduction of hysteresis losses in the magnetic refrigerant Gd_{5}Ge_{2}Si_{2} by the addition of iron. Nature 429, 853 (2004).
 4.
Gschneidner, K. A. Jr., Pecharsky, V. K. & Tsokol, A. O. Recent developments in magnetocaloric materials. Reports on Progress in Physics 68, 1479 (2005).
 5.
Tishin, A. M., Spichkin, Y. I., Zverev, V. I. & Egolf, P. W. A review and new perspectives for the magnetocaloric effect: New materials and local heating and cooling inside the human body. International Journal of Refrigeration 68, 177 (2016).
 6.
Zhitomirsky, M. E. Enhanced magnetocaloric effect in frustrated magnets. Physical Review B 67, 104421 (2003).
 7.
Sharples, J. W. et al. Quantum signatures of a molecular nanomagnet in direct magnetocaloric measurements. Nature Communication 5, 5321 (2014).
 8.
Balli, M., Jandl, S., Fournier, P. & Gospodinov, M. M. Anisotropyenhanced giant reversible rotating magnetocaloric effect in HoMn_{2}O_{5} single crystals. Applied Physics Letters 104, 232402 (2014).
 9.
Zhang, H. et al. Giant rotating magnetocaloric effect induced by highly texturing in polycrystalline DyNiSi compound. Scientific Reports 5, 11929 (2015).
 10.
Tkáč, V. et al. Giant reversible rotating cryomagnetocaloric effect in KEr(MoO_{4})_{2} induced by a crystalfield anisotropy. Physical Review B 92, 024406 (2015).
 11.
Oliveira de, N. A. Giant rotating magnetocaloric effect in RNi_{5} single crystals. Journal of Physic and Chemistry of Solids 103, 13 (2017).
 12.
Balli, M. et al. Comment on “Giant anisotropy of magnetocaloric effect in TbMnO3 single crystals”. Physical Review B 96, 146401 (2017).
 13.
Lorusso, G., Roubeau, O. & Evangelisti, M. Rotating magnetocaloric effect in an anisotropic molecular dimer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 3360 (2016).
 14.
Moon, J. Y., Kim, M. K., Choi, Y. J. & Lee, N. Giant anisotropic magnetocaloric effect in doubleperovskite Gd_{2}CoMnO_{6} single crystals. Scientific Reports 7, 16099 (2017).
 15.
Lipscomb, W. N. & Britton, D. Valence structure of the higher borides. Journal of Chemical Physics 33, 275 (1960).
 16.
Etourneau, J. & Hagenmuller, P. Structure and physical features of the rareearth borides. Philosophical Magazine B 52, 589 (1985).
 17.
Iga, F. et al. Highly anisotropic magnetic phase diagram of a 2dimensional orthogonal dimer system TmB_{4}. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 310, e443 (2007).
 18.
Gabani., S. et al. Magnetic structure and phase diagram of TmB_{4}. Acta Physica Polonica A 113, 227 (2008).
 19.
Siemensmeyer, K. et al. Fractional magnetization plateaus and magnetic order in the ShastrySutherland magnet TmB_{4}. Physical Review Letters 101, 177201 (2008).
 20.
Michimura, S., Shigekawa, A., Iga, F., Takabatake, T. & Ohoyama, K. Complex magnetic structures of a Shastry–Sutherland lattice TmB_{4} studied by powder neutron diffraction analysis. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 78, 024707 (2009).
 21.
Matas, S. et al. Magnetism of rare earth tetraborides. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 200, 032041 (2010).
 22.
Huang, W. C. et al. Dynamic magnetization process in the frustrated ShastrySutherland system TmB_{4}. EPL 102, 37005 (2013).
 23.
Wierschem, K. et al. Origin of modulated phases and magnetic hysteresis in TmB_{4}. Physical Review B 92, 214433 (2015).
 24.
Sunku, S. S. et al. Hysteretic magnetoresistance and unconventional anomalous Hall effect in the frustrated magnet TmB_{4}. Physical Review B 93, 174408 (2016).
 25.
Ye, L., Suzuki, T. & Checkelsky, J. G. Electronic transport on the ShastrySutherland lattice in Isingtype rareearth tetraborides. Physical Review B 95, 174405 (2017).
 26.
Yamauchi, H. et al. Magnetic structure and quadrupolar order parameter driven by geometrical frustration effect in NdB_{4}. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 86, 044705 (2017).
 27.
Brunt, D. et al. Fieldinduced magnetic states in holmium tetraboride. Physical Review B 95, 024410 (2017).
 28.
Brunt, D. et al. Magnetisation process in the rare earth tetraborides, NdB_{4} and HoB_{4}. Scientific Reports 8, 232 (2018).
 29.
Farkasovsky, P., Cencarikova, H. & Matas, S. Numerical study of magnetization processes in rareearth tetraborides. Physical Review B 82, 054409 (2010).
 30.
Verkholyak, T., Strečka, J., Mila, F. & Schmidt, K. P. Exact ground states of a spin1/2 IsingHeisenberg model on the ShastrySutherland lattice in a magnetic field. Physical Review B 90, 134413 (2014).
 31.
Dublenych, Y. I. Groundstate structures in Ising magnets on the ShastrySutherland lattice with longrange interactions and fractional magnetization plateaus in TmB_{4}. Physical Review E 90, 052123 (2014).
 32.
Shin, J., Schlesinger, Z. & Shastry, B. S. KondoIsing and tightbinding models for TmB_{4}. Physical Review B 95, 205140 (2017).
 33.
Jurcisinova, E. & Jurcisin, M. Adiabatic cooling processes in frustrated magnetic systems with pyrochlore structure. Physical Review E 96, 052128 (2017).
 34.
Pecharsky, V. K. & Gschneidner, K. A. Magnetocaloric effect from indirect measurements: Magnetization and heat capacity. Journal of Applied Physics 86, 565 (1999).
 35.
Grivei, E., Bayot, V., Piraux, L. & Issi, J.P. Nuclear Schottky effect in thulium. Physical Review B 51, 1301 (1995).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by projects VEGA 2003216, APVV170020 and DAAD  SVK. Liquid nitrogen for experiments was sponsored by U.S. Steel Kosice.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
S.G., K.S. and K.F. initiated the study. N.S. prepared and characterized the crystals. K.S. oriented the samples. M.O., S.G., E.G., G.P. and K.S. performed the experiments. M.O., S.G., G.P., K.S. and K.F. analyzed the data and discussed the results. S.G. and K.F. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Slavomír Gabáni.
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Orendáč, M., Gabáni, S., Gažo, E. et al. Rotating magnetocaloric effect and unusual magnetic features in metallic strongly anisotropic geometrically frustrated TmB_{4}. Sci Rep 8, 10933 (2018) doi:10.1038/s41598018293992
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Further reading

Entropy properties of antiferromagnetic model on kagome lattice: Effectivefield theory approach
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (2019)

Rotating magnetocaloric effect and thermal transport properties in sintered Nd0.8Pr0.2Co5 alloy
Journal of Rare Earths (2019)

Rotating magnetocaloric effect in TmB4 – A comparison between estimations based on heat capacity and magnetization measurements
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (2019)

Consequences of residualentropy hierarchy violation for behavior of the specific heat capacity in frustrated magnetic systems: An exact theoretical analysis
Physical Review E (2019)

Conventional and rotating magnetoelectric effect of a halffilled spinelectron model on a doubly decorated square lattice
Physics Letters A (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.