Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Agulhas Current properties shape microbial community diversity and potential functionality

Abstract

Understanding the impact of oceanographic features on marine microbial ecosystems remains a major ecological endeavour. Here we assess microbial diversity, community structure and functional capacity along the Agulhas Current system and the Subtropical Front in the South Indian Ocean (SIO). Samples collected from the epipelagic, oxygen minimum and bathypelagic zones were analysed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon and metagenomic sequencing. In contrast to previous studies, we found high taxonomic richness in surface and deep water samples, but generally low richness for OMZ communities. Beta-diversity analysis revealed significant dissimilarity between the three water depths. Most microbial communities were dominated by marine Gammaproteobacteria, with strikingly low levels of picocyanobacteria. Community composition was strongly influenced by specific environmental factors including depth, salinity, and the availability of both oxygen and light. Carbon, nitrogen and sulfur cycling capacity in the SIO was linked to several autotrophic and copiotrophic Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria. Taken together, our data suggest that the environmental conditions in the Agulhas Current system, particularly depth-related parameters, substantially influence microbial community structure. In addition, the capacity for biogeochemical cycling of nitrogen and sulfur is linked primarily to the dominant Gammaproteobacteria taxa, whereas ecologically rare taxa drive carbon cycling.

Introduction

Disentangling the influence of oceanographic factors, which shape marine microbial ecosystems, remains a major ecological endeavour. Perhaps unsurprisingly, little is known regarding the impacts of ocean currents (or frontal systems) on microbial communities and the functions they mediate. Early estimates suggest that oceans may harbour substantial levels of microbial cells: values of over 105 per millimetre of seawater in the euphotic zone and extrapolated to over 1028 cells for global oceanic waters1. However, despite the numerical abundance of microbial cells, microbial communities remain relatively underexplored in some oceans due to logistical constraints associated with marine research2,3. Moreover, the complexity of the three-dimensional ocean ecosystem further complicates efforts to understand the impact of oceanographic features on marine microbiomes. For instance, a combination of water masses at varying depths, photic and aphotic zones, in addition to oceanic current and frontal systems, complicate attempts to understand how environmental factors influence the structures and ecosystem services of marine microbial communities4. Previous studies suggest that the diversity and composition of marine ecosystems may vary markedly with either geographic distance5,6, depth7,8, water mass endemicity9,10,11, environmental variables12,13, oceanic frontal zones14 or advection by ocean currents15,16,17,18. Consequently, further phylogenetic and metagenomics surveys of understudied marine ecosystems may clarify biogeographic patterns, environmental determinants and functional cues which shape microbial communities throughout the water column.

Western boundary currents are strong, narrow and wind-driven. They carry large volumes of warm subtropical waters poleward into the mid-latitudes19,20. These currents form a major component of global ocean circulation and climate variability. The Agulhas Current (AC) occurs within 20 km from the South African east coast, extending from 25°S to 40°S and forms a critical crossroad for inter-ocean exchange of heat, salt and biota between the Indian, Atlantic and Southern Oceans19. The AC has an estimated mean volume transport of 75 Sverdrups (Sv; one unit is equivalent to 1 × 106 m3 of seawater per second), may extend to the upper 2300 m21, and exhibits flow velocities in excess of 2 ms−1 in surface waters22,23,24. At the southern tip of the continental shelf, the AC retroflects, flowing eastwards as the Agulhas Return Current (ARC)25 (Fig. 1A). Some leakage of the ARC-driven water between the South Indian and South Atlantic Oceans occurs through the generation of large warm, saline oligotrophic Agulhas rings, filaments and sub mesoscale processes19,23,26,27. These Agulhas rings transport low chlorophyll waters28 and significantly determine vertical mixing, which drives nitrogen cycling29. Agulhas mass continuity has also been shown to drive surface waters down, resulting in the upwelling of cold and nutrient waters south of the current. This in turn directly influences the metabolism and biogeochemical signatures29 and primary productivity28 of planktonic communities. While the impact of these currents on microbial communities remain unclear, it is reasonable to predict that the Agulhas Current system may influence microbial diversity and ecosystem functionality in the South Indian Ocean (SIO).

Figure 1
figure1

Agulhas Current circulation, location of Crossroads (CR) hydrographic stations and distribution of samples: (A) A map of the sampling area overlaid with the Crossroad cruise track (black line) and hydrographic stations (black bullets). The Agulhas Current system was determined using sea surface heights from Maps of Absolute Mean Dynamic Topography95 (MADT, in meters), with its position averaged over the duration of sampling (9–14 May 2015). The subtropical front indicated by grey lines96. Image courtesy of Marcel du Plessis. (B) An oceanographic profile of F-max, OMZ and Deep samples based on in situ measurements of temperature (°C), salinity (psu) and oxygen (m/l). B was generated using Ocean Data View (Schlitzer, R., Ocean Data View, http://odv.awi.de, 2017).

To elucidate microbial diversity and functional potential in the SIO, we undertook a metagenomic analysis of seawater samples collected along the Crossroads (CR) transect line30. This oceanographic monitoring line was established in 2013 to monitor air-sea exchange between the SIO and the South Atlantic Ocean. At each station, samples were collected from the epipelagic (fluorescence maximum, F-max), oxygen minimum zone (OMZ) and 10 m above the seafloor (Deep). Illumina (I-tag) sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene amplicons was used to assess the bacterial and archaeal community composition, structure and richness. Metagenomic sequencing was used to survey the microbial diversity and functional genes involved in carbon, nitrogen and sulfur cycling. Based on previous findings29, we propose that physicochemical variables across this current system may shape free-living picoplankton diversity and influence their potential metabolic capabilities.

Results

Oceanographic characteristics and site descriptions

Supplementary Tableses (n = 27, 9 × 3) were collected over a 6-day period to minimize seasonal fluctuations between sites. During the cruise, the subtropical Agulhas Current exhibited a high velocity of 2 ms−1 at approximately 36°S (station CR8). The Agulhas Return current meandered considerably during this cruise and was observed at CR6 (Fig. 1A) and again further south at ~39.5°S (station CR5), north of the Subtropical Front (STF) at 40°S31,32 along the CR line. The hydrographic stations selected as sampling points spanned key water masses in the SIO. A sharp increase in surface temperature and salinity (Supplementary Table S1) confirmed the change in oceanic zones as the South African research vessel Agulhas II (R/V S.A. Agulhas II) crossed the Subtropical Front between stations CR4 and CR5 (Fig. 1A). This frontal mixing zone separated the cool, fresher Subantarctic surface water (SASW) from the warmer subtropical surface water (STSW) located north of the STF. Consequently, these surface waters (F-max) showed gradually increasing in situ temperatures (from 8.66–22.31 °C), higher dissolved oxygen concentrations (from 4.47–6.10 ml/l) and a maximum in situ fluorescence of 2.7 mg/m3 (a proxy for chlorophyll representing phytoplankton biomass). Antarctic Intermediate water (AAIW), which form from the subduction of fresh Antarctic Surface water at the Polar Front, also demonstrated high levels of dissolved oxygen (>5.0 ml/l). However, CR stations within the Agulhas Current, displayed higher salinity (>34.50 psu) and oxygen minimum levels (average 3.73 ml/l) between the 800–1000 m range, providing evidence of Red Sea Water (RSW). RSW represent seawater which was advected southwards through the Mozambique Channel and carried within the southward fast flowing Agulhas Current. In the bathypelagic layers, Antarctic Bottom Water (Deep) showed an increase in salinity (average 34.75 psu) when compared to samples collected within the RSW (average of 34.55 psu). A map representation of the SIO samples, in situ temperature, and salinity against dissolved oxygen suggests the presence of distinct water masses (Fig. 1B).

Taxonomic analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences

A total of 1,355,966 valid 16S rRNA gene sequences were generated (ranging from 34,397 to 65,324; standard deviation (SD) of ± 6,532). The rarefied 928,719 sequences (subsampled to 34,397, the minimum number of sequences in any sample) clustered into 2,925 (average of 649; SD of ± 155) bacterial and archaeal operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on a 97% similarity cut-off (Supplementary Table S2). The relative abundances of bacterial lineages in the SIO was high (93.1% of the total OTUs assigned), with considerably lower proportions of Archaea (6.7%), and unassigned sequences (0.2%). Despite the comparatively high number of sequences per sample, rarefaction curves did not reach saturation, reflecting high phylogenetic diversity in these communities (Supplementary Fig. S1). Taxonomic analysis revealed a total of 21 phyla, which together constituted 88.7% of classified sequences. The relative abundances of bacteria was dominated by members of the phylum Proteobacteria (81.0%), followed by Actinobacteria (3.0%), Bacteroidetes (1.9%), Firmicutes (1.8%) and Cyanobacteria (1.0%), all of which appear to be ecologically rare (i.e., present at low abundances) (Fig. 2A). Gammaproteobacteria (mostly order Pseudomonadales), followed by Alphaproteobacteria (mostly SAR11 clade) were particularly common, being dominant in samples recovered from most stations and depths. Archaeal phyla were common across all samples, included Thaumarchaeota (5.7%; mostly Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus), followed by Euryarchaeota (2.8%; mostly class Marine group II (MGII)).

Figure 2
figure2

Taxonomic percent abundance of 16S rRNA gene amplicon and shotgun metagenomic reads (above 1%): (A) 16S rRNA gene, (B) Eukaryota, Archaea and Bacteria and (C) Viruses.

We observed a shift in dominant bacterial phyla within water masses along the CR transect. Overall, observable differences in bacterial taxonomy and relative abundances were found between the Agulhas Return Current (station CR5) and Agulhas Current (station CR8) for both F-max and OMZ samples (Fig. 2A). Gammaproteobacteria were dominant in SASW (Subantarctic zone surface water; 64%; stations CR1 and CR2), decreasing by 16% in STSW (Subtropical zone surface water; stations CR3-CR9). Members of class Gammaproteobacteria were also dominant in the OMZ (up to 85% of OTUs from the Agulhas Return Current and around 37% in Agulhas Current samples). Archaea (Thaumarchaeota and Euryarchaeota) made up to 31% of Subantarctic OMZ communities but were below 20% in subtropical OMZ waters. However, Deep communities differed markedly at each station.

The SIO core microbiome, here defined as individual OTUs which were present across all 27 CR samples, comprised of 14 OTUs (146, 395 sequence counts; 0.5% of all OTUs) representing a relative abundance of 15.8% of all sequences. The OTUs contributing to the core microbiome comprised of 8 Proteobacteria (4 Gammaproteobacteria and 4 Alphaproteobacteria classes) and 6 Archaea (3 Euryarchaeota and 3 Crenarchaeota phyla) (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Microbial diversity and community structure

We assessed alpha diversity using OTU richness, Shannon, Simpson and Phylogenetic Diversity indices. Our analysis showed that alpha diversity was highest in Deep samples (Supplementary Table S2) and lowest in the OMZ associated with RSW. However, the OMZ and deep communities proximal to the Agulhas Current (CR8) displayed the highest alpha diversity values. In contrast, gamma diversity was higher for F-max than Deep and OMZ samples, at 8491, 8064 and 7444, respectively.

The NMDS ordination plot showed that F-max and Deep samples were broadly similar, compared to the OMZ communities (Supplementary Fig. S4). This observation was supported by two-way analysis of similarity (ANOSIM), which revealed that the F-max and Deep samples were not significantly different (ANOSIM R = 0.013; p > 0.05, adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg correction). However, the microbial communities in the OMZ samples varied substantially, in comparison to the F-max and Deep samples (Supplementary Table S3). We performed RDA to determine the effect of environmental variables on microbial community structure. We found that oxygen and fluorescence were the most important variables explaining the variability of the F-max communities, while depth appears to be an important factor structuring OMZ samples (Fig. 3). We used variation partitioning analysis to further explore the specific effects of environmental variables (salinity, oxygen and fluorescence) and depth on microbial community structure. Variation partitioning models showed that the environment alone explained 35% of the community variation. In contrast, the environment and depth collectively accounted for 32% of the community variation (Supplementary Fig. S5). Consistent with previous studies, a large proportion of variance was unexplained (65% and 68%, respectively).

Figure 3
figure3

Relationship between microbial community composition and environmental parameters. RDA ordination described physicochemical variables (black arrows, p < 0.05) which significantly explained the variability in microbial community structure. The direction of the vectors indicates the effect of each driver variable on the two axes. The length of the arrow is proportional to the rate of change, whereas, the direction represents the correlations to the axes. Coloured text corresponds to sample depth: Deep, blue text; F-max, green and OMZ, red.

Pearson correlation coefficients (r; Supplementary Table S4) confirmed that several bacterial and archaeal phyla were significantly correlated with environmental variables including depth, fluorescence, salinity and temperature (Fig. 4). Cyanobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria and Planctomycetes were negatively correlated with depth, in contrast to Deltaproteobacteria and archaeal taxa, which were positively correlated (p < 0.05; p value corrected using Benjamini and Hochberg correction).

Figure 4
figure4

Pearson correlations between microbial communities and environmental variables shown as a heat map. A Pearson’s r value of 1 (red) indicates a total positive correlation, a value of -1 (blue) indicates a total negative correlation, and a value of 0 (white) indicates no correlation. p value adjusted to <0.05.

Taxonomic analysis of metagenomic reads

To corroborate results from 16S rRNA gene analyses and to gain further insights into microbial biogeochemical capacity along depth profiles, we performed metagenome sequencing of three samples. DNA samples collected from each depth were pooled, irrespective of water masses and location, to test the effect of depth stratification in relation to functionality. Approximately 5.1, 4.8 and 4.6 Gbp of sequence data was generated for F-max, OMZ and Deep samples, respectively (Supplementary Table S5). The high quality merged reads (mean phred quality >20), obtained after removing ambiguous bases and exact duplicates, yielded 1.45, 0.68 and 0.85 Gbp of sequence data for the F-max, OMZ and Deep, respectively (Supplementary Table S6). Metaxa2 analysis of the resultant reads against the SILVA SSU reference database was broadly consistent with the 16S rRNA gene amplicon data, with a high relative abundance of the bacterial phyla (specifically Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria) and low numbers of Archaea (specifically Euryarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota and Crenarchaeota). Consistent with the 16S rRNA gene amplicon data, the relative abundances of bacterial phyla across the three depths differed from each other (Supplementary Fig. S6). Functional annotation and taxonomic binning using MEGAN revealed a high relative abundance of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Planctomycetes, Cyanobacteria and Actinobacteria with low relative abundances of other phyla (Fig. 2B). Euryarchaeota and Thaumarchaeota sequences were identified, albeit at very low relative abundances, especially in the OMZ and Deep samples. Reads were also assigned to members of the Eukarya, including Ascomycota, Chordata, Chlorophyta and Streptophyta (Fig. 3B). In addition, reads assigned to viral taxa were mostly affiliated to dsDNA viruses (i.e.; Myoviridae, Siphoviridae, Podoviridae and Phycodnaviridae). The OMZ metagenome harboured the lowest relative abundance of viral reads (Fig. 2C). The highest number of classified viral reads was from the F-max sample, followed by the Deep metagenome.

Depth trends in biogeochemical cycling capacity

We analysed key marker genes involved in carbon, nitrogen and sulfur metabolism in the metagenomes. For biogeochemical pathway reconstruction, we selected key genes as previously described33,34, with some additional markers. Specifically, both Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) large and small subunits and phosphoribulokinase were selected as key marker genes for aerobic carbon fixation. The nitrogen metabolism pathways were examined using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthology identifiers for ammonification (nrfA), anammox (hao/hzo), denitrification (nosZ, norB and norC), nitrification (amoA, amoB and amoC), nitrogen fixation (nifD, nifK and nifH) and nitrate reduction (napA and napB) pathways. Genes linked to sulfur metabolism, including those for the assimilatory sulfate reduction (cysC, cysN and cysD), dissimilatory sulfate reduction (aprA, aprB and dsrA) and sulfide/thiosulfate (sox) pathways, were also found in all three metagenomes34 (Fig. 5).

Figure 5
figure5

Functional breakdown of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur biogeochemical cycles present in each SO metagenome. Red crosses indicate the absence of specific pathways.

Carbon cycling capacity

Reads representing genes implicated in aerobic carbon fixation via the Calvin Cycle (e.g.; RuBisCO) were observed in samples from all depths. RuBisCO genes were similar to those previously identified35 in the bacterial taxa Cyanobacteria (Synechococcus sp. and Prochlorococcus marinus) and Proteobacteria (mostly Rhodopseudomonas sp.) (Supplementary Tables S7, S8 and S9). We found several sequences similar to those previously recovered from eukaryotic green algal Kingdom Viridiplantae, which suggested that members of this clade may contribute to aerobic carbon fixation in the F-max community (Supplementary Table S7). RuBisCO large subunit Open Reading Frames (ORFs) from metaSPAdes assembly were identified in the Deep (1 ORF; closest homology to Synechococcus sp.) and F-max (3 ORFs; Rhodopseudomonas sp., Stichococcus sp. and Marivita hallyeonensisi) metagenomes. Phylogenetic reconstructions showed that these sequences clustered with RuBisCO form I and IV proteins (Supplementary Fig. S7). Furthermore, a high number of photosystem I and II hits were observed in the F-max, compared to the OMZ and the Deep samples. Moreover, reads for photosystem I and II were mostly associated with the Cyanobacterial lineage, Synechococcus, with some genes assigned to Viridiplantae. A limited number of photosystem component reads were also assigned to marine viruses (Supplementary Table S10). Genes involved in anaerobic carbon fixation (via the Reductive Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle (rTCA)) were observed only in the F-max sample (Fig. 5). Methanogenesis and aerobic methane oxidation genes were not observed in any of the metagenomes. However, fermentative pathway enzymes were present in F-max and deep samples and were affiliated with Planctomycetaceae (Supplementary Tables S7 and S9). Most carbon monoxide (CO) oxidation pathway genes were present in all samples showing similarity to those previously reported from Actinobacteria, Planctomycetaceae and Proteobacteria (Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria) (Supplementary Tables S7, S8 and S9).

Nitrogen cycling capacity

Nitrogen fixation genes from Proteobacteria (mostly Alphaproteobacteria (Rhodopseudomonas sp.)) were only found in F-max and OMZ samples (Supplementary Tables S7 and S8). Nitrification pathway genes were affiliated to unclassified Betaproteobacteria (Deep) and unclassified Thaumarchaeota (F-max), respectively (Supplementary Tables S9 and S7). Denitrification pathway genes were observed in F-max and OMZ metagenomes (Fig. 5). Organic nitrogen assimilation genes, mostly affiliated to bacteria and some archaea (Thaumarchaeota) and eukaryotic green algae (division Chlorophyta), were identified in all metagenomes. A combination of nitrate reduction and oxidation pathway genes (i.e.; narG/nxrA and narH/nxrB) were mostly associated to members of the class Gammaproteobacteria and unclassified Alphaproteobacteria in the F-max and deep metagenomes (Supplementary Table S7). Moreover, denitrification pathway genes were observed in F-max and OMZ samples (Fig. 5; Supplementary Table S7 and Supplementary Table S8). Nitrogen mineralization genes were mostly associated with the bacterial, archaeal and some eukaryotic lineages (i.e.; unknown Archaea, Proteobacteria, Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Viridiplantae) across all metagenomes.

Sulfur cycling capacity

In comparison to the carbon and nitrogen cycles, sulfur metabolism pathways were complete (Fig. 5). Key genes linked to sulfur oxidation, dissimilatory sulfate reduction and oxidation were similar to those reported from Alphaproteobacteria (unclassified Pelagibacteraceae; Supplementary Tables S7, S9 and S9). Genes linked to potential mineralization of organic sulfur compounds were identified in all metagenomes. Polysulfide reductase genes (psrA) were affiliated to diverse bacterial lineages including Verrucomicrobia, the Terrabacteria group, Actinobacteria and unclassified bacteria, in both the F-max and Deep samples (Supplementary Tables S7 and S9). The F-max metagenome harboured the most reads for Sox pathway genes (i.e.; soxA, soxB, soxD, soxH, soxX, soxY and soxZ), affiliated to members of Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria and, to a lesser extent, Betaproteobacteria (Supplementary Table S11).

Discussion

The Agulhas Current system plays a pivotal role in regulating thermohaline circulation26,36. However, very little is known of how the system may impact marine microbiomes and the ecosystem services they provide. While a number of studies have analysed surface and sediment marine samples, very few have assessed the influence of water mass variability on microbial diversity and functional capacity6,7,12,13,14,17,18,37,38,39. None of these studies has assessed community dynamics in the understudied South Indian Ocean, which is dominated by the Agulhas Current system. By providing the first austral autumn analysis of South Indian Ocean microbial communities (using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing) and their functional capacity (using metagenomic reads), we provide insights into microbial diversity and capacity for biogeochemical cycling in this important marine ecosystem. We demonstrate that free living picoplankton, dominated by chemoautotrophic taxa and were notably shaped by specific environmental variables in this current system.

Taxonomic diversity dominated by Gammaproteobacteria

Proteobacteria was the dominant bacterial phylum identified in this study. Specifically, the F-max communities were dominated by Gammaproteobacteria, followed by Alphaproteobacteria. Gammaproteobacterial dominance in Indian Ocean surface water masses has also been reported by Gupta and colleagues38,39,40. This is in contrast to other reports, which have shown that marine surfaces are dominated by members of the SAR11 clade (class Alphaproteobacteria)41. Gammaproteobacteria appear to dominate in marine environments with high levels of dissolved organic matter (DOM), whereas SAR11 are prevalent in nutrient limited systems. In regions such as the SIO, it is reasonable to predict that SAR11 may be outcompeted as a result of high DOM turnover rates, which favour phytoplankton blooms42. This extrapolation is supported by previous studies in Australian Antarctic waters, which have also shown a generally weak inverse correlation between the relative abundance of SAR11 with chlorophyll-a fluorescence levels43.

A number of studies have also shown generally low relative abundance levels of Cyanobacteria in waters within the vicinity of the SO44. However, the precise reasons for the paucity of members of this phylum in these regions remain unclear44. We suggest that the environmental conditions in the SO may directly influence the relative abundance of photoautotrophic bacterial lineages such as cyanobacteria. The Indian sector of the SO (~30–50°S) has a low chlorophyll content, low levels of trace elements (e.g., nickel, zinc, copper and iron) and relatively higher nutrient levels45,46, in comparison to waters in other marine regions. These low micronutrient levels are likely to limit the development of cyanobacterial populations in surface waters44,47. The detection of cyanobacteria in Deep samples may be due to ‘legacy DNA’ resulting from the Agulhas Current advection. Similarly, previous studies have suggested that primary productivity and the associated dominance of eukaryotic phytoplankton along the Agulhas Current-driven SIO may be highly constrained47,48. There is some evidence to support this assertion, with several studies showing that increased micronutrient availability may directly lead to more efficient growth of cyanobacteria and phytoplankton49.

Excluding the highly abundant Gamma- and Alphaproteobacteria, both Deep and OMZ samples harboured several other taxa with known chemolithoautotrophic lifestyles; e.g., carbon fixing and sulfur-oxidizing Oceanospirillales, Thaumarchaeota and anammox Planctomycetes, as observed in previous studies50. Our findings support a recent metaproteomic based survey of sites across OMZ, which demonstrated a prevalence of anammox Planctomycetes, the distribution of which were also highly significantly correlated with depth51. We also demonstrate that other bacterial and archaeal phyla were significantly correlated with depth, which is consistent with previous studies52.

The viral community structure mirrored fluorescence profiles (i.e., highest diversity at F-max followed by Deep and OMZ, respectively). This suggests that the structure of viral communities was consistent with phototrophic and heterotrophic bacterial abundance, as reported previously53,54. Viruses (mostly dsDNA, affiliated to the order Caudovirales) harboured photosynthetic genes, suggesting their potential role in influencing genetic and functional diversity of bacterial lineages55. Viruses have been shown to increase prokaryotic diversity within marine habitats56 and are likely to influence the cycling of nitrogen and sulfur in the epipelagic zone57. Bacteriophages may also play an important role in the diversification of class Gammaproteobacteria53,55, which dominate the SIO marine water. While our metagenomic data provide insights into viral diversity in SIO marine waters, the precise mechanisms used by viral communities to influence microbial community structure in oligotrophic regions warrants further investigation.

Vertical and horizontal trends in microbial community structure

Free-living microbial communities found in the Deep samples were more diverse than those recovered from the F-max and OMZ samples, which harboured lower levels of alpha diversity. This result is in broad agreement with a recent global survey of marine microbial communities2. However, several studies which have assessed microbial community composition across depth strata have yielded conflicting results2,58,59,60,61. This is likely to be due to the distinctive environmental conditions (e.g., high macronutrients and current systems) in the different marine environments. For instance, the results of a survey by Ghiglione and colleagues (2012)58, which assessed biogeographic patterns in marine microbial communities in polar oceanic waters, support the finding that environmental conditions may influence the structures of microbial communities at different depths. Specifically, the authors found that surface communities may be subject to short-term environmental selection (e.g., temperature and fast-moving surface currents), while deeper communities may be influenced by extended water mass residence, reduced ventilation and sluggish connectivity through ocean circulation58. Consequently, the Agulhas Current system’s capacity for driving surface and deep water connectivity29,37, may justify the similar trend of F-max and Deep communities. Whereas, the low amounts of dissolved oxygen may be responsible for the observed dissimilarity of the OMZ communities. We note that our decision to pool samples for shotgun analysis based solely on depth may skew the results of community taxonomic and functional analysis based on key marker gene analysis. However, we argue that this decision is unlikely to affect our findings for OMZ and Deep samples as these were from their respective water masses and were likely less variable in comparison to F-max samples.

The differences between bacterial and archaeal communities were ascribed to different depths and stations, a result similar to two distinct Pacific sites62. Correlation, variation partitioning and ordination analyses of environmental variables, specifically oxygen (a proxy for respiration), salinity (a proxy for water mass history), depth (a proxy for light penetration) and fluorescence (a proxy for primary productivity) were shown to be important factors for microbial zonation. These results suggest that heterogeneity in these physicochemical properties of the SIO waters may significantly influence the spatial distribution of bacterial and archaeal assemblages. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that other unmeasured biotic and abiotic explanatory variables such as dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic matter (POM), nitrate, silicate, dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) and phosphate concentrations may explain the community structure. Alternately, the high proportion of unexplained variability may be due to stochastic dispersal through water masses.

Microbial communities drive biogeochemical cycling

Microbial primary productivity in the Atlantic and Pacific surface oceans is mainly driven by cyanobacterial lineages, i.e.; Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus43,63. However, the SIO 16S rRNA gene and metagenomic datasets displayed a low relative abundance of reads assigned to Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. Despite the low abundance, Cyanobacteria appear to be the primary carbon fixers in surface waters along with Viridiplantae. This finding suggests that, within SIO waters, Cyanobacteria and Viridiplantae may act as keystone species in carbon cycling processes.

Results from metagenome assembly and annotation of the RuBisCO large subunit showed that the majority of ORFs clustered with Form I (closest homology to Synechococcus sp. and Stichococcus sp.) and IV (Alphaproteobacteria). RuBisCO Form I, II and III are known to catalyse CO2 fixation, whereas Form IV gene products have been identified only as RuBisCO-like proteins (RLPs) and lack several amino acid residues involved in catalysis64. Further functional characterization of RuBisCOs and RLP proteins may provide insights into how SIO microbial communities use both enzymes to drive photosynthetic and dark carbon fixation. Moreover, our analyses showed that the anaerobic carbon fixation pathway via the reductive TCA cycle may be the dominant energy mechanism in the bacterial communities (mainly Alphaproteobacteria and other lineages; Supplementary Tables S7S9). The detection of this capacity across all metagenomes suggests a contribution from chemolithoautotrophic metabolism. Potential carbon loss by respiration (indicated by the presence of cytochrome oxidase genes) was also linked to Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria (mostly, unclassified Pelagibacteraceae) and unclassified Planctomycetes (Supplementary Tables S7 and S9).

Nitrogen cycling capacity was dominated by mineralization, assimilation, nitrate reduction and nitrite oxidation pathways, suggesting that microbial communities have the capacity for both organic and inorganic nitrogen utilization. Our analysis showed only low relative abundance levels of nitrogen fixation genes, compared to other genes linked to nitrogen metabolism. Rhodopseudomonas sp., a photoorganomixotroph, displayed the metabolic capacity for both denitrification and nitrogen fixation, suggesting that these bacteria may play a role in both nitrogen uptake and release. These results suggest that nitrogen fixation may be driven by non-cyanobacterial members in the SIO, possibly due to iron limitation in this region. Bioavailable iron is a vital co-factor for nitrogen fixation65 and a limiting factor for cyanobacterial primary production. The limited iron in the SIO may force other bacterial diazotrophs to fulfil the ecological niche typically occupied by cyanobacteria66. The lack of potential nitrifying and ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in the shotgun metagenomic data supports this observation. However, some archaeal species with a capacity for ammonia oxidation were identified in the 16S rRNA gene Illumina-tagged sequencing and metagenome data. This suggests that these microbial communities may have the capacity for ammonia oxidation, although these taxa may be ecologically rare67. We acknowledge that amplification bias may also result in under-representation of these groups68.

The analysis of sulfur cycling genes from shotgun analyses showed complete metabolic pathways, assigned to Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria. Surprisingly, the CR metagenomes yielded no sequences with taxonomic affiliations to the ubiquitous sulfur-oxidizer SUP05 clade, although these phylotypes were observed in the amplicon dataset. The detection of aerobic phototrophic bacterial members of Alphaproteobacteria (Roseobacter/Rhodobacter clade), capable of oxidising reduced inorganic sulfur compounds such as sulfite or thiosulfate. In addition, the prevalence of sox and other sulfide reductase genes (adenylylsulfate reductase subunit A (aprA), adenylylsulfate reductase subunit B (aprB) and sulfite reductase (dsrA)) in the F-max metagenome further suggests their potential role in phototrophic labile sulfur metabolism69.

In summary, our results suggest that free-living microbial assemblages in the SIO are heterogeneous and spatially structured in response to the energetic Agulhas Current and depth-associated physicochemical conditions. Moreover, this oceanographically complex environment is dominated by a few bacterial groups. We identified Gammaproteobacteria as a crucial class responsible for carbon metabolism. Some copiotrophic Gammaproteobacteria are ubiquitous across all depths and have previously been implicated as a sink or source organic matter, and are known to transfer fixed carbon along trophic levels in marine waters70,71. These members also appeared to demonstrate a capacity to facilitate the acquisition of inorganic compounds (such as sulfur or nitrate compounds) as an energy source for the fixation of oceanic carbon dioxide (chemolithoautotrophic lifestyle). The dominance of this class in the SIO, a nutrient rich marine environment influenced by Antarctic waters, suggests that they may be uniquely adapted to this region. To a lesser extent, Cyanobacteria and micro-eukaryote (Viridiplantae) appeared as principal primary producers. We suggest that the low number of potential autotrophic pathway and nitrogen metabolism genes might be confounded by the paucity of trace metals (especially, iron) and high nutrients in this region72,73. Based on the occurrence of RuBisCO and sulfur oxidising genes affiliated to Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria, we predict that these members could play crucial roles in phototrophic productivity. However, there are some caveats associated with the analysis of biogeochemical pathway genes, including the relatively low level of functional annotation from metagenomic reads. Given the relevance of the Agulhas Current system to ocean circulation, further studies may provide clarity on the role of Gammaproteobacteria and viruses in ecosystem functioning and biogeochemistry within the entire ecosystem.

Materials and Methods

Sampling site description, sample collection and processing

The Crossroads (CR) transect, established in 2013, was designed to monitor the inter-annual variability of the Agulhas Current and its return path known as the Agulhas Return Current. Activities along the monitoring line include high resolution full depth Conductivity-Temperature-and-Depth (CTD) stations crossing the Agulhas Current system and the Subtropical Front (STF) to its south. Seawater samples were collected during the Marion Island Relief Voyage cruise (15th April − 9th May 2015; austral autumn) on-board the R/V SA. Agulhas II (Fig. 1A). Samples were retrieved from 9 selected oceanographic stations using a 24 × 20 litre Niskin bottle CTD rosette multi-sampler (Sea-Bird SBE-911 plus V2 CTD System; Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc., Bellevue, Washington, USA). Seawater samples (5 l) were immediately collected from 3 Niskin bottles at each station position, from three predetermined depths: (i) Deep (>5 m above seafloor), (ii) Low dissolved oxygen zone (OMZ), and (iii) Fluorescence maximum (F-max). Depth was determined from the altimeter on the CTD rosette and echo-sounders installed aboard the research vessel (Supplementary Table S1). Each 5-litre sample was then pre-filtered through a 47 mm, 0.45-µm-pore cellulose acetate membrane filter to circumvent biomass saturation (Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany), followed by filtration through a 0.2-µm-pore cellulose acetate membrane filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Göttingen, Germany). Temperature, salinity, oxygen and in situ fluorescence data was obtained from various sensors contained within the CTD rosette system, for all sampled depths. Filters containing the biomass were stored at −20 °C aboard and transported to CMEG laboratory on ice. In total, we collected 27 samples (n = 27, 9 × 3) for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and from these, pooled DNA from each depth (3 in total) for metagenomic analysis.

Bacterial and Archaeal 16S rRNA gene based amplicon sequencing

Metagenomic DNA was extracted from both filters using a MoBio PowerSoil™ DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were sent to the Molecular Research DNA (MR DNA) sequencing facility (Shallowater, Texas, USA) for amplicon sequencing of the V4-V5 region with 515 F and 806 R primers on an Illumina MiSeq instrument. This primer pair has been shown to underestimate members of the SAR11 bacterioplankton clade74, which could have affected our results. However, our study focused on the variation of microbial communities along depth and in the vicinity of the Agulhas Current system, instead of the resolution of SAR 11 members37. Sequence data was analysed using QIIME version 1.9.175. Briefly, fasta and quality files recovered were converted into a single fastq file prior to quality filtering. The metadata mapping file was corrected for any textual or formatting errors. Thereafter, libraries were split into samples using the split_libraries_fastq.py script. The detection and removal of chimeric sequences was done using USEARCH v6.1 software76, using both the de novo and reference-based (Chimera Slayer reference database77) methods. The remaining sequences were clustered into OTUs using SILVA 128 database at 97% similarity78. Lastly, singletons were filtered out using the filter_otus_from_otu_table.py script. Rarefactions curves (Supplementary Fig. S1) were generated in R software (http://cran.r-project.org/; Version 3.2.2). The non-singletons output OTU matrix was normalized to account for uneven sample sums by subsampling all sequences with that of the sample with lowest reads. This rarefaction approach has been shown to favour high abundance taxa and underestimate low abundance/rare taxa79. However, our study focuses on the distribution of dominant taxa and their potential role in nutrient cycling, as previously described37,80.

Metagenomic sequencing and Bioinformatic analysis

Metagenomic DNA extracted from each sampled depth was pooled and amplified prior to sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq platform (2 × 250 bp, 20 million reads) at the MR DNA facility (Shallowater, Texas, USA), resulting in a total of 3 samples (n = 3). The quality of reads were assessed and processed using Prinseq-light v0.681: i.e. reads with ambiguous bases and mean phred quality score below 20 were removed from the dataset as previously described34. The phi X 174 (ΦX174) bacteriophage82 and human reads were removed from the sequencing data using BBMap alignment program (http://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap). Exact duplicates were also removed to avoid biases resulting from library amplification. The resultant high-quality reads were used for taxonomic and functional analyses. Briefly, paired end reads were joined using PEAR v0.9.1083 using default parameters. Thereafter, merged reads were subsampled to the lowest number of reads (for OMZ; 6,605,209) using Seqtk (https://github.com/lh3/seqtk). The resultant reads were searched against the NCBI-NR protein database. Diamond software84 was used for BLASTx analysis with an e-value of 1e-3. BLASTx results were then used for taxonomic and functional assignments through the MEGAN v5.10 software85. Comparative functional analysis of carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) metabolism was conducted using KEGG pathway modules and SEED subsystems. Potential microbial C, N and S pathway marker genes (Supplementary Tables S7S11) were analysed as previously reported33,34 with additional RubisCO large subunit phylogenetic analysis35,86,87 (Supplementary Fig. S7). Taxonomic classification based on the Small Subunit rRNA gene sequences from the metagenome data were analysed using Metaxa2 profiler34,88 and SILVA 12889. Viral reads were classified using MEGAN and RefSeq-Virus database90.

Data availability

The raw sequencing reads from this study for the 16S rRNA and shotgun metagenomes have been submitted to the NCBI SRA (accession numbers: SRX2247573: 16S rRNA amplicon data, SRX2185070 (Deep), SRX2185068 (OMZ) and SRX2185067 (F-max) metagenomes.

Analysis of microbial diversity comparisons

For each sample, alpha diversity and richness indices (Observed OTUs, ACE, Chao1, Shannon and Good’s coverage; Supplementary Table S2) were calculated from rarefied sequences to ensure inter-sample taxonomic comparability using the QIIME alpha_diversity.py script. Microbial community analyses using of the 16S rRNA gene, was performed using the vegan package91 for the statistical program R, to evaluate the relationships between the bacterial/archaeal community structure and environmental parameters (Supplementary Table S1). Beta and gamma diversity calculations were performed using vegan. Venn diagrams were generated to illustrate the number of shared and unique OTUs in each sampled depth (F-max, OMZ and Deep) using vegan and gplots R packages (Supplementary Fig. S2). The ‘core microbiome’, here defined as OTUs (97% OTU cut-off level; Supplementary Fig. S3) which occurred in all samples (F-max1–9, OMZ1–9 and Deep1–9), was obtained using QIIME version 1.9.175. To evaluate the response of microbial communities to the Agulhas Current system, we used relative abundance counts of the sequence data. We note that while this method may be observational and biased in contrast to quantitative data, these methods have provided crucial insights on microbial community structure.

Statistical analysis

A two-dimensional non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot was constructed using Bray-Curtis dissimilarities indices from Hellinger-transformed OTUs (Supplementary Fig. S4), in order to visualize the spatial patterns in community structure among the F-max, OMZ and Deep sample groups, as described previously91. Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM)92 was thereafter performed to test for differences between depths based on 999 permutations. The ANOSIM R statistic ranges from 0 to 1, with values closer to 0 indicating more similarity and values closer to 1 indicating more differences. The ANOSIM p value was corrected to account for multiple testing according to Benjamini and Hochberg procedure93 (Supplementary Table S3). Explanatory variables (i.e., log-transformed environmental variables and depth) and their contribution to Hellinger-transformed community variance partitioning94 were determined using the adjusted R2 selection criterion with the varpart package (Supplementary Figure S5). A redundancy analysis (RDA; Fig. 3) was used to assess the effect of abiotic data using the ordistep function using a permutation analysis cut-off p value of 0.05, and adjusted R2 criteria. Pearson correlations coefficients (r; Supplementary Table S4) and significance tests (p < 0.05, Benjamini-Hochberg p-correction using the stats R package) were used to measure the relationship between environmental variables and microbial communities (at class level; relative abundance, >0.1%). Pearson correlations and heat maps were generated using Hmisc, stats, reshape2 and ggplot2 R packages (Fig. 4). Map representation was performed with Ocean Data View v4.7.6 (Schlitzer, R., Ocean Data View, http://odv.awi.de, 2015).

References

  1. 1.

    Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C. & Wiebe, W. J. Prokaryotes: The unseen majority. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6578–6583 (1998).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sunagawa, S. et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Brown, C. T. et al. Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria. Nature 523, 208–211 (2015).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mock, T. et al. Bridging the gap between omics and earth system science to better understand how environmental change impacts marine microbes. Global Change Biol. 22, 61–75 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Milici, M. et al. Bacterioplankton biogeography of the atlantic ocean: a case study of the distance-decay relationship. Front Microbiol 7 (2016).

  6. 6.

    Sul, W. J., Oliver, T. A., Ducklow, H. W., Amaral-Zettler, L. A. & Sogin, M. L. Marine bacteria exhibit a bipolar distribution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2342–2347 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    DeLong, E. F. et al. Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean’s interior. Science 311, 496–503 (2006).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Walsh, E. A. et al. Bacterial diversity and community composition from seasurface to subseafloor. ISME J 10, 979–989 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Agogué, H., Lamy, D., Neal, P. R., Sogin, M. L. & Herndl, G. J. Water mass‐specificity of bacterial communities in the North Atlantic revealed by massively parallel sequencing. Mol Ecol 20, 258–274 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dinasquet, J. et al. Mixing of water masses caused by a drifting iceberg affects bacterial activity, community composition and substrate utilization capability in the Southern Ocean. Environ Microbiol 19, 2453–2467 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Djurhuus, A., Boersch-Supan, P. H., Mikalsen, S.-O. & Rogers, A. D. Microbe biogeography tracks water masses in a dynamic oceanic frontal system. R Soc. Open Sci 4, 170033 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ngugi, D. K., Antunes, A., Brune, A. & Stingl, U. Biogeography of pelagic bacterioplankton across an antagonistic temperature–salinity gradient in the Red Sea. Mol Ecol 21, 388–405 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bryant, J. A. et al. Wind and sunlight shape microbial diversity in surface waters of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. ISME J 10, 1308–1322 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Baltar, F., Stuck, E., Morales, S. & Currie, K. Bacterioplankton carbon cycling along the Subtropical Frontal Zone off New Zealand. Prog Oceanogr. 135, 168–175 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Galand, P. E. et al. Archaeal diversity and a gene for ammonia oxidation are coupled to oceanic circulation. Environ Microbiol 11, 971–980 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Doblin, M. A. & van Sebille, E. Drift in ocean currents impacts intergenerational microbial exposure to temperature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5700–5705 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hamdan, L. J. et al. Ocean currents shape the microbiome of Arctic marine sediments. ISME J 7, 685–696 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wilkins, D., Van Sebille, E., Rintoul, S. R., Lauro, F. M. & Cavicchioli, R. Advection shapes Southern Ocean microbial assemblages independent of distance and environment effects. Nat Commun 4, ncomms 3457 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lutjeharms, J. R. E. The Agulhas Current. (Springer, 2006).

  20. 20.

    Ansorge, I. J. & Lutjeharms, J. R. E. In Whales and Dolphins of the Southern African Subregions (eds Best, P. & Folkes, P. A.) 1–3 (Cambridge University Press, 2007).

  21. 21.

    Donohue, K. A., Firing, E. & Beal, L. Comparison of three velocity sections of the Agulhas Current and Agulhas Undercurrent. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans. 105, 28585–28593, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jc000201 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Boebel, O. et al. Float experiment studies interocean exchanges at the tip of Africa. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union. 79, 7–8 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bryden, H. L., Beal, L. M. & Duncan, L. M. Structure and transport of the Agulhas Current and its temporal variability. J. Oceanogr. 61, 479–492 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Beal, L. M., Elipot, S., Houk, A. & Leber, G. Capturing the transport variability of a western boundary jet: Results from the Agulhas Current Time-Series Experiment (ACT). J. Phys. Oceanogr. 45, 1302–1342, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0119.1 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Quartly, G. D. & Srokosz, M. A. Seasonal variations in the region of the Agulhas Retroflection: Studies with Geosat and FRAM. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 23, 2107–2124 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Beal, L. M. et al. On the role of the Agulhas system in ocean circulation and climate. Nature 472, 429–436 (2011).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gordon, A. L., Weiss, R. F., William, M. S. & Warner, M. J. Thermocline and intermediate water communication between the South Atlantic and Indian Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans. 97, 7223–7240 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mann, K. H. & Lazier, J. R. Dynamics of Marine Ecosystems: Biological-Physical Interactions in the Oceans 3 edn, (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).

  29. 29.

    Villar, E. et al. Environmental characteristics of Agulhas rings affect interocean plankton transport. Science 348 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Lutjeharms, J. & Ansorge, I. The Agulhas Return Current. J. Marine Syst 30, 115–138 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Graham, R. M. & De Boer, A. M. The Dynamical Subtropical Front. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans. 119, 5676–5685 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Orsi, A. H., Whitworth, T. & Nowlin, W. D. On the meridional extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Deep Sea Res. Part 1 Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 42, 641–673 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Llorens-Marès, T. et al. Connecting biodiversity and potential functional role in modern euxinic environments by microbial metagenomics. ISME J. 9, 1648–1661, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.254 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Vikram, S. et al. Metagenomic analysis provides insights into functional capacity in a hyperarid desert soil niche community. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1875–1888 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. A. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 27, 824–834 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bard, E. & Rickaby, R. E. M. Migration of the subtropical front as a modulator of glacial climate. Nature 460, 380–383, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08189 (2009).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Baltar, F., Currie, K., Stuck, E., Roosa, S. & Morales, S. E. Oceanic fronts: transition zones for bacterioplankton community composition. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 8, 132–138 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gupta, P. et al. Phylogenetic analysis and biological characteristic tests of marine bacteria isolated from Southern Ocean (Indian sector) water. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 34, 73–82 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Gupta, P., Agrawal, H. K. & Bandopadhyay, R. Distribution Pattern of Bacteria in the Two Geographic Poles and Southern Ocean from the Reported 16S rDNA Sequences. Current Science 108, 1926–1930 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Morris, R. M. et al. SAR11 clade dominates ocean surface bacterioplankton communities. Nature 420, 806–810, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01281 (2002).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Obernosterer, I., Catala, P., Lebaron, P. & West, N. J. Distinct bacterial groups contribute to carbon cycling during a naturally iron fertilized phytoplankton bloom in the Southern Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 2391–2401, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.6.2391 (2011).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Williams, T. J. et al. A metaproteomic assessment of winter and summer bacterioplankton from Antarctic Peninsula coastal surface waters. ISME J. 6, 1883–1900 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Flombaum, P. et al. Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9824–9829 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Frew, R., Bowie, A., Croot, P. & Pickmere, S. Macronutrient and trace-metal geochemistry of an in situ iron-induced Southern Ocean bloom. Deep Sea Res. Part 2 Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 48, 2467–2481 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Deppeler, S. L. & Davidson, A. T. Southern Ocean Phytoplankton in a Changing Climate. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00040 (2017).

  46. 46.

    Barlow, R. G. et al. Chemotaxonomic investigation of phytoplankton in the shelf ecosystem of the KwaZulu-Natal Bight, South Africa. Afr. J.Mar. Sci 37, 467–484 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Schumann, E. H., Churchill, J. R. S. & Zaayman, H. J. Oceanic variability in the western sector of Algoa Bay, South Africa. Afr. J. Mar. Sci 27, 65–80 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kuffner, I. B. & Paul, V. J. Effects of nitrate, phosphate and iron on the growth of macroalgae and benthic cyanobacteria from Cocos Lagoon, Guam. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 222, 63–72 (2001).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Swan, B. K. et al. Potential for chemolithoautotrophy among ubiquitous bacteria lineages in the dark ocean. Science 333, 1296–1300 (2011).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hawley, A. K., Brewer, H. M., Norbeck, A. D., Pasa-Tolic, L. & Hallam, S. J. Metaproteomics Reveals Differential Modes of Metabolic Coupling Among Ubiquitous Oygen Minimum Zone Microbes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 11395–11400 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Herlemann, D. P. et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J 5, 1571–1579 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Boras, J. A. et al. Factors shaping bacterial phylogetic and functional diversity in coastal waters of the NW Mediterranean Sea. Estuar. Coast. Mar. Sci. 154, 102–110 (2015).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Liang, Y. et al. Distribution of marine viruses and their potential hosts in Prydz Bay and adjacent Southern Ocean, Antarctic. Polar Biol. 39, 365–378 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Schmidt, H. F., Sakowski, E. G., Williamson, S. J., Polson, S. W. & Wommack, K. Shotgun metagenomics indicates novel family A DNA polymerases predominate within marine virioplankton. ISME J. 8, 103–114 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Lindell, D., Jaffe, J. D., Johnson, Z. I., Church, G. M. & Chisholm, S. W. Photosynthesis genes in marine viruses yield proteins during host infection. Nature 438, 86–89 (2005).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Roux, S. et al. Ecogenomics and biogeochemical impacts of uncultivated globally abundant ocean viruses. Nature 537, 689–693 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Brown, M. V. et al. Microbial community structure in the North Pacific ocean. ISME J. 3, 1374–1386 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ghiglione, J. F. et al. Pole-to-pole biogeography of surface and deep marine bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17633–17638 (2012).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Signori, C. N., Thomas, F., Enrich-Prast, A., Pollery, R. C. & Sievert, S. M. Microbial diversity and community structure across environmental gradients in Bransfield Strait, Western Antarctic Peninsula. Front. Microbiol. 5 (2014).

  60. 60.

    Luria, C. M., Ducklow, H. W. & Amaral-Zettler, L. A. Marine bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic diversity and community structure in the continental shelf of the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 73, 107–121 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Walsh, E. A., Smith, D. C., Sogin, M. L. & D’Hondt, S. Bacterial and archaeal biogeography of the deep chlorophyll maximum in the South Pacific Gyre. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 75, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01746 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ting, C. S., Rocap, G., King, J. & Chisholm, S. W. Cyanobacterial photosynthesis in the oceans: the origins and significance of divergent light-harvesting strategies. Trends Microbiol. 10, 134–142 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Tabita, F. R., Satagopan, S., Hanson, T. E., Kreel, N. E. & Scott, S. S. Distinct form I, II, III, and IV Rubisco proteins from the three kingdoms of life provide clues about Rubisco evolution and structure/function relationships. J Exp Bot 59, 1515–1524 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Moore, C. M. et al. Large-scale distribution of Atlantic nitrogen fixation controlled by iron availability. Nat. Geosci. 2, 867, https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO667 (2009).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Delmont, T. O. et al. Nitrogen-Fixing Populations Of Planctomycetes And Proteobacteria Are Abundant In The Surface Ocean. bioRxiv 129791, https://doi.org/10.1101/129791 (2017).

  66. 66.

    Qin, W. et al. Marine ammonia-oxidizing archaeal isolates display obligate mixotrophy and wide ecotypic variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12504–12509 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Lynch, M. D. & Neufeld, J. D. Ecology and exploration of the rare biosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 217–229 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Mattes, T. E. et al. Sulfur oxidizers dominate carbon fixation at a biogeochemical hot spot in the dark ocean. ISME J. 12, 2349–2360 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Nikrad, M. P., Cottrell, M. T. & Kirchman, D. L. Uptake of dissolved organic carbon by gammaproteobacterial subgroups in coastal waters of the West Antarctic Peninsula. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3362–3368 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Pedlera, B. E., Aluwihareb, L. I. & Azam, F. Single Bacterial Strain Capable of Significant Contribution to Carbon Cycling in the Surface Ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7202–7207 (2014).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Zehr, J. P. & Kudela, R. M. Nitrogen cycle of the open ocean: from genes to ecosystems. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 3, 197–225, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142819 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Morel, F. M. & Price, N. M. The biogeochemical cycles of trace metals in the oceans. Science 300, 944–947, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083545 (2003).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Parada, A., Needham, D. M. & Fuhrman, J. A. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1403–1414 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Haas, B. J. et al. Chimeric 16s rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 21, 494–504, https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.112730.110 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Yilmaz, P. et al. The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 643–648 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531 (2014).

  79. 79.

    Keshri, J. et al. Differential impact of lytic viruses on the taxonomical resolution of freshwater bacterioplankton community structure. Water Res 124, 129–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.053 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Schmieder, R. & Edwards, R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27, 863–864 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Mukherjee, S., Huntemann, M., Ivanova, N., Kyrpides, N. C. & Pati, A. Large-scale contamination of microbial isolate genomes by Illumina PhiX control. Stand. Genomic Sci. 10, 18 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Zhang, J., Kobert, K., Flouri, T. & Stamatakis, A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 30, (614–620 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Huson, D. H. & Mitra, S. Introduction to the analysis of environmental sequences: metagenomics with MEGAN. Methods Mol. Biol. 856, 415–429 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11 (2010).

  86. 86.

    Tabita, F. R., Hanson, T. E., Satagopan, S., Witte, B. H. & Kreel, N. E. Phylogenetic and evolutionary relationships of RubisCO and the RubisCO-like proteins and the functional lessons provided by diverse molecular forms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 363, 2629–2640 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Bengtsson‐Palme, J. et al. Metaxa2: improved identification and taxonomic classification of small and large subunit rRNA in metagenomic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 1403–1414 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Quast, C. et al. SILVA Databases. Encyclopedia of Metagenomics: Genes, Genomes, and Metagenomes: Basics, Methods, Databases and Tools. (Springer, 2015).

  89. 89.

    O’Leary, N. A. et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids. Res. gkv1189 (2015).

  90. 90.

    Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package. Version 2.3–5 (2016).

  91. 91.

    Makhalanyane, T. P. et al. Evidence for successional development in Antarctic hypolithic bacterial communities. ISME J. 7, 2080–2090, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.94 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Clarke, K. R. Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18, 117–143 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. 57, 289–300 (1995).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Peres-Neto, P. R., Legendre, P., Dray, S. & Borcard, D. Variation partitioning of species datamatrices: estimation comparison of fractions. Ecology 87, 2614–2625 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Rio, M. H., Guinehut, S. & Larnicol, G. New CNES-CLS09 global mean dynamic topography computed from the combination of GRACE data, altimetry, and in situ measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 116, C07018 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Swart, S. & Speich, S. An altimetry-based gravest empirical mode south of Africa: 2. Dynamic nature of the Antarctica Circumpolar fronts. J. Geophys. Res. 115, C03003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005300 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr Eoin Gunnigle, Voyage Chief Scientist Dr Sir Hans M. Verheye, Chief Ocean Technician Marcel van den Berg and his team for their hard work during the Crossroads line. In addition, we would like to thank the excellent service of Captain Gavin Syndercombe, his officers, cadets and crew of the R/V S.A. Agulhas II for assisting with sample acquisition during the Marion 2015 Relief Voyage. We also thank the following organizations for funding support: National Research Foundation (SANAP funding for TPM and IJA, Partial support was also provided under the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at PNNL, a multi-program national laboratory operated by Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. We also gratefully acknowledge the University of Pretoria (Dean’s Funding for TPM, RDP funding for TPM). SP and SV were supported by the Innovation Scholarships (NRF) and the Claude Leon Foundation, respectively. We thank Dr. Gilbert Siko (Department of Science and Technology) and Mr. Nishendra Devanunthan (Department of Environmental Affairs) support with cruise logistics. We also wish to thank the Centre for High Performance Computing (CHPC) for access to computational resources.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.P.M. designed the study, S.P., S.V. and T.P.M. performed research. S.P., S.V. and T.P.M. analysed the microbial data. J.K.J., I.J.A., Y.V.D.P., D.A.C. and T.P.M. contributed reagent/materials/analysis tools. S.P., S.V. and T.P.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thulani P. Makhalanyane.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phoma, S., Vikram, S., Jansson, J.K. et al. Agulhas Current properties shape microbial community diversity and potential functionality. Sci Rep 8, 10542 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28939-0

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing