Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Tissue distribution and cell tropism of Brucella canis in naturally infected canine foetuses and neonates


Brucella canis infection is an underdiagnosed zoonotic disease. Knowledge about perinatal brucellosis in dogs is extremely limited, although foetuses and neonates are under risk of infection due to vertical transmission. In this study, immunohistochemistry was used to determine tissue distribution and cell tropism of B. canis in canine foetuses and neonates. Diagnosis of B. canis in tissues of naturally infected pups was based on PCR and sequencing of amplicons, bacterial isolation, and immunohistochemistry, whose specificity was confirmed by laser capture microdissection. PCR positivity among 200 puppies was 21%, and nine isolates of B. canis were obtained. Tissues from 13 PCR-positive puppies (4 stillborn and 9 neonates) presented widespread immunolabeling. Stomach, intestines, kidney, nervous system, and umbilicus were positive in all animals tested. Other frequently infected organs included the liver (92%), lungs (85%), lymph nodes (69%), and spleen (62%). Immunolabeled coccobacilli occurred mostly in macrophages, but they were also observed in erythrocytes, epithelial cells of gastrointestinal mucosa, renal tubules, epidermis, adipocytes, choroid plexus, ependyma, neuroblasts, blood vessels endothelium, muscle cells, and in the intestinal lumen. These results largely expand our knowledge about perinatal brucellosis in the dog, clearly demonstrating a pantropic distribution of B. canis in naturally infected foetuses and neonates.


Brucella canis is a zoonotic coccobacillus described for the first time as a cause of canine abortion in 19661. Since then, B. canis has been recognized as the etiologic agent of reproductive disorders and, less frequently, of discospondylitis and ocular infection in dogs2. Although B. canis is recognized as an important bacterial zoonosis, human brucellosis is mainly related to B. melitensis, B. abortus, and B. suis, while brucellosis due to B. canis infection in humans has historically been considered less relevant3. Zoonotic infection may occur mainly in humans in close contact with bitches that aborted. However, several cases of human brucellosis due to B. canis infection occurred in owners of dogs with no history of abortion, and these patients presented unspecific symptoms when compared to those of patients infected with other Brucella spedies, which may lead to the lack of clinical suspicion and diagnostic failure4,5,6,7,8. Although these case reports have not been characterized by a labour-related transmission, human infection with B. canis is also considered an occupational underdiagnosed disease9.

B. canis differs from other Brucella species in its pathogenicity and preferential host, affecting mainly dogs, and, occasionally, humans and wild canids2,3. Antigenically, B. canis is classified as a rough Brucella due to its outer membrane lipopolysaccharide that characterizes a rough surface on colonies grown for more than 48 hours10. Rough lipopolysaccharide, also naturally expressed in B. ovis, is associated with impaired intracellular survival in vitro, and induction of lower levels of cytokine expression in human monocytes11,12. Furthermore, B. canis does not cross-react in traditional serological test antigens from smooth species, namely B. melitensis, B. abortus, and B. suis13. The lack of cross-reactivity between smooth and rough Brucella antigens in serology contributes to diagnostic failure and under diagnosis of B. canis human infections5,9.

B. canis induces less inflammation and more insidious lesions when compared to other Brucella spp.14, but its ability to persist in the host, disseminate and perpetuate in dog population, is demonstrated by its prevalence in many countries15,16, and the difficulty for clearing the pathogen from infected dogs17 and eradicating it in kennels18,19,20. Diagnosis of B. canis infection remains a challenge due to frequent false negative results in direct and indirect diagnostic methods employed to detect the infection in adult dogs and humans6,21,22.

Despite the relevance of canine brucellosis as a reproductive disease that is vertically transmitted to the offspring2,19,23, and the high canine perinatal mortality rates of unknown cause in breeding kennels24,25, canine perinatal brucellosis remains neglected worldwide. One of the reasons for this situation is that B. canis infection is suspected mostly in cases of abortion, but not in cases of perinatal mortality1,10,15.

Cellular and tissue tropism of B. canis in its natural preferential host remains poorly understood. It has been assessed based on isolation and histopathology10,26, but not through in situ localization of the bacteria. In canine foetal brucellosis, bronchopneumonia, myocarditis, and renal haemorrhage have been described in an experimental study26, while neonatal canine brucellosis remains to be described. Therefore, canine brucellosis is a disease that has been neglected both in man and in the dog, possibly due to its stealthy behaviour, difficulty for diagnosis, and limited knowledge about B. canis infection, treatment, and eradication. A better understanding of canine brucellosis in foetuses and neonates will contribute for improving diagnosis and prevention of this disease in dogs and humans. The aim of this study was to describe cell and tissue tropism of B. canis in naturally infected stillborn and neonatal dogs, which generated a novel perspective on B. canis pathogenesis, with implications regarding the persistence of the pathogen and the risk of zoonotic transmission.


PCR, sequencing, and Brucella sp. isolation

A total of 42 puppies out of the 200 (21%) that were tested, from 16 kennels, were PCR-positive. Amplicon sequences had 100% identity with Brucella spp. (GenBank access number: M20404.1).

B. canis was isolated from tissues of six out the 10 puppies subjected to bacterial isolation, totalling 42 tissue samples. From these six puppies, nine isolates were obtained from placenta (n = 2), spleen (n = 2), kidney (n = 2), heart (n = 2), and lung (n = 1). Isolates and their origins are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Brucella-positive puppies, their breed, kennel, age, bacterial isolates origin, and positivity by immunohistochemistry in organs and tissues.

Pantropic distribution of Brucella canis in foetal and neonatal canine tissues

Immunolabeled coccobacilli were widely distributed in several organs and tissues from all 13 Brucella PCR-positive puppies (Table 1). Organs with the highest frequency of positivity (100%) included the stomach, intestine, kidney, and umbilicus, which contained numerous intracytoplasmic immunolabeled coccobacilli located mostly within macrophages (Fig. 1). Macrophages were also positive in the hepatic parenchyma as well as in portal spaces and around central lobular veins (12/13), in lungs (11/13), and heart (11/13). Reproductive organs, including the gonads, uterus and prostate, although pre-pubertal and in a very young age, were frequently positive (8/11), with immunolabeling mostly in macrophages, in the albuginea (Fig. 1), prostate, myometrium, uterine broad ligament. Spleen and lymph nodes, positive in 62–69% of the puppies, most of the time presented low intensity (−or +, 10/13; − or +11/13), respectively. In these tissues, positive macrophages often had perivascular localization (Fig. 1), and infiltrated the wall of arteries (pulmonary, umbilical, coronary, and hepatic).

Figure 1

Immunohistochemistry for detection of Brucella sp. in naturally infected canine stillborn and neonates. (a) Stillborn. Duodenum, with several diffusely distributed immunolabeled macrophages in the lamina propria and submucosa (arrow). Bar = 100 μm. (b) Stillborn. Cecum, macrophages containing intracytoplasmic immunolabeled coccobacilli in lamina propria and muscle layer (arrow). Bar = 100 μm. (c) Neonate, 10-day-old. Lung, with several interstitial immunostained macrophages around an arteriole and bronchioles (arrow). Bar = 50 μm. (d) Neonate, 13-day-old. Testicle with several immunostained macrophages in the albuginea (arrow). Bar = 100 μm.

There was also positive coccoid staining in intravascular erythrocytes (7/13) in different organs, including the lungs, genital organs, kidneys, liver, heart chambers, and cerebrum (Fig. 2). In addition to macrophages and erythrocytes, positivity was also observed in other cell types in different organs, as in superficial epithelium of gastric mucosa, in enterocytes, and in goblet cells in the small and large intestines (Fig. 3). Meconium was positive in 75% of stillborn puppies while only 33% of neonates had immunolabeled coccobacilli in the intestinal luminal content, with a lower intensity of immunolabeling (+, 3/9). The gastrointestinal mucosa was intensely positive in all puppies, although immunolabeled coccobacilli were observed mostly intracytoplasmically in macrophages diffusely distributed in the lamina propria, submucosa, muscular layer, mesentery and gastro-splenic ligament, in stillborn and neonates. Only two puppies had low intensity of immunolabeling in stomach and intestine: one premature stillborn and one four-day-old premature neonate who did not nurse in the bitch and was fed artificial milk formula by orogastric tube due to palatoschisis. In five puppies, immature adipocytes in the mesenteric fat contained immunolabeled coccobacilli in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3).

Figure 2

Immunohistochemistry for detection of Brucella sp. in stillborn dogs. Erythrocytes in a blood vessel in the kidney with granular immunostaining compatible with intraerythrocytic B. canis (arrow). Inset: Blood in a cardiac chamber with moderate number of immunostained erythrocytes. Bar = 20 μm.

Figure 3

Immunohistochemistry for detection of Brucella sp. in canine foetuses and neonates. (a) Neonate, 2-day-old. Ileum with numerous intracellular coccobacilli in goblet cells of the villus epithelium. Bar = 50 μm. (b) Stillborn. Immunostained adipocytes in the gastro-splenic ligament, with a granular pattern adjacent to lipid vacuoles. Bar = 20 μm. (c) Neonate, 2-day-old. Kidney with granular immunostaining in tubular epithelial cells and in tubular lumen. Bar = 50 μm. (d) Stillborn. Myocardium with intracellular granular immunostaining in myocardial cells. Bar = 20 μm.

In five puppies, three stillborn and two neonates, Brucella was observed intracytoplasmically in the epithelial cells of proximal and distal convoluted tubules, Henle loops, and collecting tubules (Fig. 3). Immunolabeled coccobacilli occurred also intracytoplasmically in adipocytes in perirenal fat (++, 2/13).

Occasionally, intracytoplasmic immunolabeled coccobacilli were present in smooth muscle cells in umbilical, pulmonary and coronary arteries, where few or no macrophages and neutrophils were present (Fig. 4). The same finding was observed in myocardium cells, with variable number of coccobacilli intracytoplasmically in the absence of inflammation or associated with rare interstitial macrophages and neutrophils (Fig. 3).

Figure 4

Immunohistochemistry for detection of Brucella sp. in the umbilical cord of a stillborn dog. (a) Skin adjacent to the umbilicus with immunolabeled coccobacilli in stratum corneum (arrow) and in macrophages in the dermis (arrow heads). Bar = 20 μm. (b) Arterial wall in the umbilical cord with intracellular immunostained coccobacilli in smooth muscle cells. Bar = 50 μm.

In the umbilical cord, immunostained coccobacilli occurred on the epidermis in the stratum corneum (Fig. 4) in stillborn and neonates (+ to +++), and also intracytoplasmically in the apocrine gland epithelial cells (++) in only one sample, and in adipocytes in subcutaneous fat (+, 3/10), besides the positivity in macrophages and in arterial smooth muscle cells already mentioned above.

There were only two placentas available for this study, and they were both positive by immunohistochemistry, with intracellularly immunolabeled B. canis predominantly in macrophages located in the foetal mesenchyme, and occasionally within trophoblasts (Fig. 5). Although, immunolabeling was observed in macrophages, there was no evidence of inflammatory reaction in haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections (Fig. 5), and those cells were interpreted as resident macrophages of the placenta.

Figure 5

Immunohistochemistry for detection of Brucella sp. in the placenta. Section of the foetal placenta infected with Brucella canis, with absence of inflammatory reaction. Haematoxylin and eosin. Bar = 50 μm. Inset: intracellular immunostaining in a cell located in the mesenchyme with morphology compatible with a macrophage.

In the nervous tissue, there was positive staining intracytoplasmically in the choroid plexus (Fig. 6) (++ to +++, 3/4), ependyma (+ to ++, 3/4), neuroblasts (+ to +++, 2/4), and in macrophages in the meninges (+, 1/3). In the eye, there was a mild immunostaining in the cornea and retina (+, 2/3), while in the dermal surface of the eyelids there were numerous macrophages containing positive coccobacilli (++, 2/3).

Figure 6

Immunohistochemistry for detection of Brucella sp. in the choroid plexus of a stillborn dog. Choroid plexus with intracytoplasmic immunostaining with a granular pattern in cells of the choroid plexus. Bar = 50 μm.

Extracellular immunolabeled coccobacilli occurred rarely, in small numbers, in the lumen of renal tubules, intestinal content and epicellular on choroid plexus cells.

Considering the originality of these findings, immunolabeled epithelial cells of renal tubules were microdissected by using a laser capture microdissection apparatus. DNA extracted from these immunolabeled microdissected immunolabeled renal tubular epithelia was PCR-positive for Brucella sp., further confirming the specificity of immunolabeling.


This study largely expanded our knowledge regarding the tissue and cell tropism of B. canis in canine foetuses and neonates, clearly demonstrating a previously unknown pantropic distribution of this pathogen in several organs and tissues. This is the first thorough description of B. canis tissue distribution and cell tropism in its preferential host, and therefore this study contributed to a better understanding of canine brucellosis.

Abundant immunohistochemistry positivity in the gastrointestinal mucosa and in intestinal contents suggested that the oral route of infection may play an important role in canine perinatal brucellosis, possibly through ingestion of bacteria in suspension in the amniotic fluid. Carmichael and Kenney26 hypothesized that foetal infection could occur through the oral route, based on their findings of high bacterial loads in the amniotic fluid and mild inflammation observed in the digestive system of canine foetuses. Furthermore, high positivity in the gastrointestinal mucosa was also observed in this study in one neonate at 12 days after birth, which may be due to transmammary transmission. Importantly, B. abortus endocytosis by M cells in the Peyer’s patches had been described after oral experimental infection of calves27 and in mice28, but the pathogen has not been observed within enterocytes and goblet cells. While the gastrointestinal mucosa and mesentery were highly positive in all puppies in this study, mesenteric lymph nodes were negative in most of the puppies, which is possibly due to the early stages of infection in these cases.

The ability of B. canis to infect renal tubular epithelial cells strongly suggested a previously unsuspected route of excretion of the organism. Transmission of B. canis has been attributed to prolonged contact with urine of an infected dog, but it was assumed that the organism originated from prostatic secretions of adult males29. Although the prostate gland in puppies was also positive, immunolabeled coccobacilli were located in interstitial macrophages, while in renal tubules they were in epithelial cells and in the lumen, indicating a source for urine contamination in the kidney itself. Zoonotic transmission to humans in close contact with young puppies has been documented5,8, and based on our findings, it may have occurred due to shedding of the organism in the urine, since in these cases abortion or vaginal secretions that are considered the conventional means of zoonotic transmission were absent23.

This study has demonstrated for first time that B. canis is associated with erythrocytes in naturally infected canine foetuses and neonates. Canine brucellosis is recognized as a disease with intermittent cell-associated bacteremia, presumably intracytoplasmically in leucocytes2,23,26. B. melitensis is capable of infecting erythrocytes of experimentally infected mice, in which bacterial cells were demonstrated either epi- or intracellularly in erythrocytes30. However, association of Brucella spp. with erythrocytes has not been previously demonstrated in naturally infected animals. Distribution in tissues and frequency of positivity in erythrocytes was variable, a finding that is consistent with the intermittent detection of B. canis in the blood of infected dogs21.

B. canis infection in myocardial cells and arterial smooth muscle cells had not been documented before. It may explain the frequent finding of myocarditis and arteritis associated with this disease26. In humans, arterial aneurysm has been diagnosed in a teenager infected with B. canis4, what may have occurred due to the direct infection of the smooth muscle cells.

This study also demonstrated that B. canis are often associated with cells of the choroid plexus. Importantly, neurobrucellosis is a highly relevant clinical presentation in different host species31. B. abortus has been described infecting neuroblasts and glial cells32, but, in dogs, encephalic neurological signs are usually not attributed to B. canis infection. Based on our findings, research on neurobrucellosis in dogs should be encouraged, and perhaps this agent should be included among the differentials in canine neurological patients.

Interestingly, immunostaining was observed in genital organs of canine foetuses and neonates. B. canis tropism to the genital tract in males has been well documented in adult dogs33, but it has not been documented in prepubertal animals. The early infection in epididymis and testicles may compromise irreversibly the reproductive potential of the dogs. Interestingly, in the uterus, positivity was observed in myometrium, and seldom in endometrium. Brucella spp. are known to have tropism for the placenta34, although there are clearly differences in terms of clinical and pathological manifestations according to combination of Brucella and host species35. Interestingly, the two placentas available for this study had B. canis infection as demonstrated by bacterial isolation and immunohistochemistry, but no inflammatory reaction was observed histologically. This contrasts with the severe necrotizing and neutrophilic placentitis observed in other species, particularly in B. abortus-infected pregnant cows34. However, these observations require additional studies since only two samples are not sufficient for a definitive conclusion.

Ocular lesions have been reported in adult dogs infected with B. canis17. Therefore, immunolabeling in the cornea and retina in neonates is not unexpected, but it indicated that infection and ocular disease may occur in perinatal brucellosis, even before the opening of the eyelid.

B. canis infection of adipocytes has not been previously described, although adipocytes are permissive cells to bacterial infection. Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human adipocytes has been demonstrated by IHQ and in situ PCR, especially in adipose tissue adjacent to kidneys, lymph nodes, stomach, heart and skin36, the same distribution observed for B. canis in this study. Adipose tissue may represent a site for persistence of Brucella infection in dogs, a localization that is suitable to evade treatment and immune response, as is the case for M. tuberculosis in humans37. In adipocytes, the endoplasmic reticulum is localized adjacent to the lipid vacuole38, the same location where the immunohistochemistry positive coccobacilli were visualized in this study. Furthermore, adipocytes in canine foetuses and neonates are immature and undergoing differentiation. In a previous in vitro study, pre-adipocytes expressed unfolded proteins during the differentiation process39 a response also observed during Brucella intracellular replication40, which suggests that differentiating adipocytes may represent a viable niche for Brucella replication. The presence of B. canis in mature adipocytes remains to be investigated.

Apart from the infected macrophages, immunolabeling was not associated with other inflammatory cells or significant inflammation in tissues, what seems to be a feature of B. canis, since naturally infected dogs do not develop signs of sepsis26, and experimentally infected animals develop only mild inflammation14. The low inflammatory tissue reaction, observed in this study, may contribute to the prolonged unapparent infection and difficulty to eradicate the organism, which is typical of canine brucellosis2,18,20.

The data generated in this study provided a vast body of novel information that expands our comprehension of canine brucellosis, and provided the basis for new hypothesis regarding transmission of infection to humans or other dogs, through urine, faeces and skin of canine neonates. These hypotheses should be further investigated since it may be extremely valuable to establish new preventive measures when handling neonatal dogs.

In conclusion, B. canis is widespread in macrophages in foetal and neonatal tissues, and cell tropism is diverse, including enterocytes, renal tubular epithelia, adipocytes, myocardium, and choroid plexus cells. Gastrointestinal infection occurs in congenital brucellosis in dogs. Bacteria may be excreted in the faeces and urine of young puppies.


Experimental design

Canine foetuses and neonates of 19 breeds that died spontaneously in 32 breeding kennels were submitted for necropsy by the owners. Kennels were located in the State of Espirito Santo, Brazil. Puppies were collected from November 2014 until June 2016. Necropsy, sample collection and analysis were performed according to a protocol approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (CEUA/UFMG), under protocol number 197/2014. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Brucella diagnosis in puppies - DNA Extraction, PCR and sequencing

For diagnosis of Brucella-positive puppies, approximately 50 mg of lung, kidney, spleen, liver, and myocardium, from 200 canine foetuses and neonates were macerated individually with a scalpel blade in 100 μL of TE buffer, and processed for DNA extraction according to the method described by Pitcher et al.41. After spectrophotometry, DNA samples from the five organs of each puppy were mixed to a final concentration of 250 ng/µL. PCR was directed to the bcsp31 gene with primers 5′-TGGCTCGGTTGCCAATATCAA-3′ and 5′-CGCGCTTGCCTTTCAAGGTCTG-3′42. PCR reaction was performed with 2.5 μL of sample DNA, 18.5 µL of Supermix PCR (22 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.4], 55 mM KCl, 1.65 mM Magnesium Chloride, 220 μM dGTP, 220 μM dATP, 220 μM dTTP, 220 μM dCTP, 22 U/mL recombinant Taq DNA Polymerase - Invitrogen, USA), 1.0 µL of each primer (10 µM) in total volume of 25 μL, with expected product of 223 base pairs (bp). Amplification parameters were: 94 °C for 3 minutes; 40 cycles (94 °C for 30 seconds, 60 °C for 30 seconds, 72 °C for 30 seconds) and 72 °C for 10 minutes. The amplified products were subjected to 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with SYBR®Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen, USA) and examined in an ultraviolet light transilluminator.

Amplified PCR products of bcsp31 gene from three different puppies (from different kennels) were sequenced in order to confirm specificity of Brucella sp. amplification. Amplicons were extracted from agarose gel and purified using QIAEXII Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, USA) and sequenced by capillary electrophoresis in ABI3130 device. Data was analysed as described by Altschul et al.43 with Phred Software (, Sequence Scanner Software (Applied Biosystems) ( = catNavigate2&catID = 600583&tab = DetailInfo) and Blast (


Paraffin embedded tissues from Brucella-positive puppies were selected for immunohistochemistry based on the absence of autolysis. The 13 puppies were included in this analysis: four stillborn and nine neonates, from eight different breeds, and nine breeding kennels.

Brucella sp. immunolabeling was performed in the following organs: lung, heart, liver, spleen, stomach, intestines, kidney, bladder, prostate, uterus, gonads, umbilical cord, encephalon, and eye. Paraffin embedded tissues were sectioned (4 μm thick) and processed for immunohistochemistry as described by Xavier et al.34, with modifications. Tissue sections were dewaxed, hydrated, and incubated three times in hydrogen peroxide 10% for 20 minutes, after each bath tissue sections were washed three times in PBS. To block unspecific reactions, tissues sections were incubated in 2.5% powdered milk suspension for one hour. The primary antibody was applied over the slides at the dilution of 1:1000, incubated in humidified chamber overnight and washed in PBS. Secondary biotinylated universal antibody with streptavidin-biotin complex (LSAB2 System-HRP, DAKO, USA) was added and slides were incubated for 1 hour and 40 minutes at room temperature. Reaction was revealed by using the chromogen AEC (DAKO, USA). Meyer’s haematoxylin was used for counterstaining.

The primary polyclonal antibody employed has been previously described44. Reactions included positive and negative controls. Positive controls consisted of Brucella infected mouse tissues. Negative controls consisted of infected mouse and puppy tissues incubated overnight with PBS with suppression of the primary antibody in the reaction.

Tissue sections were analysed under light microscopy and the frequency of the immunostaining was estimated under high magnification field (400x) as follows: + = one positive mark in ten fields or more; ++ = one positive mark in every two fields; +++ = more than two positive marks in more than ten fields.

Laser capture microdissection

In order to confirm that immunohistochemically Brucella sp.-positive cells indeed contained Brucella sp., we performed laser capture microdissection using the MMI CellCut® System. A sample of renal tissue of one stillborn, positive by immunohistochemistry, was used. Paraffin-embedded tissue was mounted on the MMI slide membrane, processed for immunohistochemistry as described, and immunostained tubular epithelial cells were microdissected and subsequently the DNA was extracted using the Dneasy blood & tissue kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To investigate the integrity of the extracted DNA, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for the β-actin gene45 with 22 μL SuperMix PCR (22 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 55 mM KCl, 1.65 mM Magnesium Chloride, 220 μM dGTP, 220 μM dATP, 220 μM dTTP, 220 μM dCTP, 22 U/mL recombinant Taq DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen, USA), 0.5 μL of each primer (10 μM), 5′-GGCATCCTGACCCTGAAGTA-3′ and 5′-CGCAGCTCGTTGTAGAAGGT-3′, and 2.5 μL of DNA sample. Amplification was performed at 95 °C for 10 minutes, 95 °C for 30 seconds, 60 °C for 30 seconds, and 72 °C for 30 seconds with 35 consecutive cycles, followed by final extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes, with expected product of 98 bp. The amplified products were subjected to 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with SYBR®Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen, USA) and examined in an ultraviolet light transilluminator. For Brucella sp. detection, PCR for the bcsp31 gene was performed as described.

Isolation and identification of Brucella canis

Frozen samples of heart, kidney, spleen and lung, from ten PCR and immunohistochemistry Brucella-positive puppies, from eight different kennels, were submitted in duplicates to bacterial isolation46. Samples of placenta were available from two puppies, and were included in this study. Tissue samples stored at −80 °C were thawed and homogenized with a scalpel blade in 500 µL of PBS. Then, 100 µL of the homogenate were inoculated in selective Tryptose agar (BD Difco, USA) with and without antibiotics (2,500 UI of polymyxin B; 12,500 UI bacitracin; 50,000 UI of nystatin; 50 mg of cycloheximide; 2.5 mg of nalidixic acid; and 10 mg of vancomycin - Sigma Aldrich, USA) and tryptose broth (BD Difco, USA). Plates were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2, checked every 48 hours for colony growth. After seven days of incubation, broth was plated on tryptose soy agar without antibiotics and these plates incubated in the same conditions for a maximum of 21 days, when, if no growth was detected, they were considered negative and discarded.

B. canis isolates were identified based on colony morphology, acriflavine test47, PCR for the bcsp31 gene42, and B. ovis-specific PCR34. For molecular analyses, bacterial colonies were collected from agar plates into 200 µL PBS and heat-killed (100 °C/1 hour) and DNA was extracted as described by Pitcher et al.41.

For the acriflavine agglutination test, 30 μL of a 0.001% aqueous solution of acriflavine was mixed with bacterial colony. PCR for the bcsp31 gene was performed as described. For B. ovis-specific PCR 22 μL of SuperMix PCR (22 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.4], 55 mM KCl, 1.65 mM Magnesium Chloride, 220 μM dGTP, 220 μM dATP, 220 μM dTTP, 220 μM dCTP, and 22 U/mL of recombinant Taq DNA Polymerase) were used (Invitrogen, USA), 0.5 μL of each primer (25 μM), 5′-GCCTACGCTGAAACTTGCTTTTG-3′ and 5′-ATCCCCCCATCACCATAACCGAAG-3′, and 2.0 μL of DNA sample. Amplification was performed at 95 °C for 5 minutes, 95 °C for 1 minute, 57 °C for 1 minute and 72 °C for 1 minute for 35 consecutive cycles, followed by final extension at 72 °C for 5 minutes, with an expected product of 228 bp, which was analysed in 1.5% agarose gel stained with SYBR®Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen, USA).

Isolates with positive amplification of the bcsp31 Brucella gene, negative in PCR for B. ovis, and agglutination in the acriflavine test were identified as B. canis.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request to anyone who wishes to repeat our analyses or collaborate with us.


  1. 1.

    Carmichael, L. E. Abortion in 200 beagles. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 149, 1126 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Makloski, C. L. Canine brucellosis management. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 41, 1209–1219 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Moreno, E. Retrospective and prospective perspectives on zoonotic brucellosis. Front. Microbiol. 5, 213–230 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Piampiano, P., Mcleary, M., Young, L. W. & Janner, D. Brucellosis: unusual presentations in two adolescent boys. Pediatr. Radiol. 30, 355–357 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lucero, N. E. et al. Human Brucella canis outbreak linked to infection in dogs. Epidemiol. Infect. 138, 280–285 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lucero, N. E. et al. Unusual clinical presentation of brucellosis caused by Brucella canis. J. Med. Microbiol. 54, 505–508 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Manias, V. et al. Endocarditis por Brucella canis: primer caso documentado en un paciente adulto en Argentina. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 45, 50–53 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dentringer, C. M. et al. Human Brucella canis infection and subsequent laboratory exposures associated with a puppy, New York City, 2012. Zoonoses Public Health. 62, 407–414 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Krueger, W. S., Lucero, N. E., Brower, A., Heil, G. L. & Gray, G. C. Evidence for unapparent Brucella canis infections among adults with occupational exposure to dogs. Zoonoses Public Health. 61, 509–518 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Carmichael, L. E. & Kenney, R. M. Canine abortion caused by Brucella canis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 152, 605–616 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rittig, M. G. et al. Smooth and rough lipopolysaccharide phenotypes of Brucella induce different intracellular trafficking and cytokine/chemokine release in human monocytes. J. Leuko. Biol. 74, 1045–1055 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bagüés, M. P. J., Terraza, A., Gross, A. & Dornand, J. Different responses of macrophages to smooth and rough Brucella spp.: Relationship to virulence. Infect. Immun. 72, 2429–2433 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Diaz, R., Jones, L. M., Leong, D. & Wilson, J. B. Surface antigens of smooth Brucellae. J. Bacteriol. 96, 893–901 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chacón-Díaz, C. et al. Brucella canis is an intracellular pathogen that induces a lower proinflammatory response than smooth zoonotic counterparts. Infect. Immun. 83, 4861–4870 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Holst, B. S. et al. The first case of Brucella canis in Sweden: background, case report and recommendations from a northern European perspective. Acta Vet. Scan. 54, 18–27 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Keid, L. B. et al. Brucella canis infection in dogs from commercial breeding kennels in Brazil. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 64, 691–697 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ledbetter, E. C., Landry, M. P., Stokol, T., Kern, T. J. & Messick, J. B. Brucella canis endophthalmitis in 3 dogs: clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment. Vet. Ophthalmol. 12, 183–191 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pickerill, P. A. & Carmichael, L. E. Canine brucellosis: control programs in commercial kennels and effect on reproduction. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 160(12), 1607–1615 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hollett, R. B. Canine brucellosis: outbreaks and compliance. Theriogenology. 66, 575–587 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Reynes, E., López, G., Ayala, S. M., Hunter, G. C. & Lucero, N. E. Monitoring infected dogs after a canine brucellosis outbreak. Comp. Immun. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 35, 533–537 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Carmichael, L. E. & Shin, S. J. Canine brucellosis: a diagnostician’s dilemma. Sem. Vet. Med. Surg. 11, 161–165 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Taques, I. I. G. G. et al. Molecular assessment of the transplacental transmission of Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Brucella canis and Erhlichia canis in dogs. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 49, 47–50 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wanke, M. M. Canine brucellosis. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 82–83, 195–207 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tønnessen, R., Borge, K. S., Nødtvedt, A. & Indrebø, A. Canine perinatal mortality: a cohort study of 224 breeds. Theriogenology. 77, 1788–1801 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mila, H. et al. Inadequate passive immune transfer in puppies: definition, risk factors and prevention in a large multi-breed kennel. Prev. Vet. Med. 116, 209–213 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Carmichael, L. E. & Kenney, R. M. Canine brucellosis: the clinical disease, pathogenesis and immune response. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 156, 1726–1734 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ackermann, M. R., Cheville, N. F. & Deyoe, B. L. Bovine ileal dome lymphoepithelial cells: endocytosis and transport of Brucella abortus strain 19. Vet. Pathol. 25, 28–35 (1988).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Paixão, T. A. et al. Establishment of systemic Brucella melitensis infection through the digestive tract requires urease, the type IV secretion system, and lipopolysaccharide O antigen. Infect. Immun. 77, 4197–4208 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Serikawa, T. & Muraguchi, Y. Significance of urine in transmission of canine brucellosis. Jap. J. Vet. Sci. 41, 607–616 (1979).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Vitry, M. A. et al. Brucella melitensis invades murine erythrocytes during infection. Infect. Immun. 82, 3927–3938 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Olsen, S. C. & Palmer, M. V. Advancement of knowledge of Brucella over the past 50 years. Vet. Pathol. 51, 1076–1089 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ozkaraka, M., Ceribasi, S., Ceribasi, A. O., Ayse, K. & Hasan, O. The role of apoptosis and autophagy in bovine abortions associated with Brucella spp. Acta Vet. Beograd. 66, 37–50 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Moore, J. A. & Kakuk, T. J. Male dogs naturally infected with Brucella canis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 155, 1352–1358 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Xavier, M. N., Paixão, T. A., Poester, F. P., Lage, A. P. & Santos, R. L. Pathological, immunohistochemical and bacteriological study of tissues and milk of cows and fetuses experimentally infected with Brucella abortus. J, Comp. Pathol. 140, 149–157 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Poester, F. P., Samartino, L. E. & Santos, R. L. Pathogenesis and pathobiology of brucellosis in livestock. Rev. Sci. Tech. 32, 105–115 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Neyrolles, O. et al. Is adipose tissue a place for Mycobacterium tuberculosis persistence? Plos One 1, e43 (2006).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Agarwal, P. et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis persistence in various adipose depots of infected mice and the effect of anti-tubercular therapy. Microbes. Infect. 16, 571–580 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Suzuki, M., Shinohara, Y., Ohsaki, Y. & Fujimoto, T. Lipid droplets: size matters. J. Electron Microsc. 60(Suppl. 1), 101–116 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Longo, M. et al. Pathologic endoplasmic reticulum stress induced by glucotoxic insults inhibits adipocyte differentiation and induces an inflammatory phenotype. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1863, 1146–1156 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Smith, J. A. et al. Brucella induces an Unfolded Protein Response via TcpB that supports intracellular replication in macrophages. Plos Pathogens 9, e1003785 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Pitcher, D. G., Saunders, N. A. & Owe, R. J. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 8, 151–156 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Baily, G. G., Krahn, J. B., Drasar, B. S. & Stocker, N. G. Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 95, 271–275 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 5, 403–410 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Santos, R. L., Peixoto, M. T. D., Serakides, R., Costa, G. M. & Martins, N. E. Detección de Brucella abortus (muestra D19) por el complejo inmunoenzimático avidina-biotina-peroxidasa en él testículo y en él epidídimo de bovinos inoculados experimentalmente. Archiv. Reprod. Anim. 6, 34–41 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Turchetti, A. P. et al. Transcription of innate immunity genes and cytokine secretion by canine macrophages resistant or susceptible to intracellular survival of Leishmania infantum. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 163, 67–76 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Minharro, S. et al. Biotyping and genotyping (MLVA16) of Brucella abortus isolated from cattle in Brazil, 1977 to 2008. PLoS One 8, e81152 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Alton, G. G., Jones, L. M. & Pietz, D. E. Laboratory Techniques in Brucellosis. WHO Monograph Series no. 55. (WHO, 1975).

Download references


Work in RLS lab is supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brazil), FAPEMIG (Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, Brazil), and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brazil). RLS and TAP have fellowships from CNPq (Brazil).

Author information




T.D.S., T.A.P. and R.L.S. contributed to study creation and design. T.D.S., T.F.C., J.P.S.M., J.V.M.L., M.F.S. and T.A.P. participated in data acquisition. T.D.S., J.P.S.M., T.A.P. and R.L.S. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, All the authors contributed to drafting and critically reviewing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renato Lima Santos.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Souza, T.D., de Carvalho, T.F., Mol, J.P.d.S. et al. Tissue distribution and cell tropism of Brucella canis in naturally infected canine foetuses and neonates. Sci Rep 8, 7203 (2018).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing