Article | Open | Published:

# Nitrothiophene carboxamides, a novel narrow spectrum antibacterial series: Mechanism of action and Efficacy

## Abstract

The mechanism of efflux is a tour-de-force in the bacterial armoury that has thwarted the development of novel antibiotics. We report the discovery of a novel chemical series with potent antibacterial properties that was engineered to overcome efflux liability. Compounds liable to efflux specifically via the Resistance Nodulation and cell Division (RND) pump, AcrAB-TolC were chosen for a hit to lead progression. Using structure-based design, the compounds were optimised to lose their binding to the efflux pump, thereby making them potent on wild-type bacteria. We discovered these compounds to be pro-drugs that require activation in E. coli by specific bacterial nitroreductases NfsA and NfsB. Hit to lead chemistry led to the generation of compounds that were potent on wild-type and multi-drug resistant clinical isolates of E. coli, Shigella spp., and Salmonella spp. These compounds are bactericidal and efficacious in a mouse thigh infection model.

## Introduction

Although most bacterial strains possess over four thousand genes, only about four hundred of these are strictly essential for their survival. With the widespread rise in antibiotic resistance across various bacterial pathogens, a pivotal approach to address this major concern is to develop antibacterial compounds that specifically inhibit these essential but novel targets. Most often bacteria develop resistance either by target mutations that reduce the binding affinity of the drug or by “effluxing” these out of the cell; events that drastically reduce or abort the antibacterial effect of the compound. The efflux pumps of the RND family are significant contributors1 to the widespread multi-drug resistance (MDR) exhibited by Gram-negative bacteria. These pumps can efflux a wide range of compounds including structurally and chemically diverse antibiotics like fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin), β-lactams (e.g., piperacillin, meropenem, and aztreonam), tetracyclines (minocyline), oxazolidinones (linezolid) and β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., clavulanate and sulbactam)2,3,4. Owing to their wide-substrate specificity, overexpression of the RND efflux pumps often results in decreased susceptibility to antibacterial agents1. These observations are substantiated by improved MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) to several antibiotics in efflux pump mutants or wild-type (WT) bacteria tested in the presence of efflux pump inhibitors5,6.

The dominant paradigm of antibiotic discovery efforts in the last three decades has been to identify unique small molecules that interfere with the functioning of an essential target while also having a concomitant adverse impact on the bacterial viability. Unfortunately such target-directed drug discovery efforts based on this “logical hypothesis” have met with limited success7. Although hits from enzyme based screens have been successfully optimized to leads with nanomolar potency against essential targets, these compounds strikingly lacked activity against WT bacteria8,9. In case of Gram-negative pathogens, this lack of MIC could be attributed to the efficient efflux of the inhibitors via the diverse set of efflux pumps present on the outer membrane. The latter observation is based on reports that potent inhibitors have MICs in pump deleted mutants like E. coli ΔtolC, but in contrast are totally ineffective against WT bacteria8,9. Target based exploration often resulted in hits that did not have whole cell activity. Alternatively, phenotypic screens started with hits that possessed anti-bacterial activity. However, the molecular target of such hits emerging from phenotypic screens were unknown. In the absence of target information, further optimization was often challenging and resulted in flat structure-activity relationship (SAR). Additionally, most WT active hits from commercial chemical libraries are compounds that lack drug-like properties (e.g., high logP), hit multiple targets, make lead identification and optimization a challenging process. Thus, even after investments of billions of dollars by large pharma companies, these approaches have failed to deliver new anti-bacterials10.

Since the elucidation of three-dimensional structures of the multi-subunit complex efflux pumps, most reports described strategies to inhibit pumps with small molecules as a strategy to inactivate them11. However, such approaches have a low probability of success either due to the presence of multiple families of pumps making the problem multifactorial or because the level of efficiency of these pumps vary depending on the stress or the milieu. Considering these hurdles, we explored a novel approach by designing antibacterial compounds that lose their interaction with the efflux pump and as a consequence escape efflux.

The primary RND efflux complex in E. coli consists of a pump protein (AcrB), a channel that traverses the outer membrane (TolC), and AcrA that connects TolC and AcrB. A proton-motive force drives the efflux pump complex12. The AcrAB-TolC efflux pump system and its homologs such as MexAB-OprM of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are well studied2,3,4. Initial three-dimensional structures of AcrB with various antibiotics reveal that AcrB is a homo-trimeric complex12 and antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin and nafcillin (PDB ID: 1T9U & 1T9W, respectively) interact either with the central or periplasmic cavity13. Recent reports of co-crystal structures of AcrB with small molecules reveal that it is assembled as an asymmetric trimer and it exists in three different conformations14. These are termed as Access/Loose, Binding/Tight and lastly the Extrusion/Open conformation respectively.

In the current study, we have devised a phenotypic-screen based cascade with a series of multiple evaluations using various efflux deficient E. coli strains. Compounds that were subjected to efflux exclusively via the AcrAB-TolC pump complex were identified and optimized to reduce binding to AcrB using structure-based design algorithm. This led to the identification of nitrothiophene carboxamide (NTC) based compounds that demonstrated potent activity against E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Shigella spp., and Salmonella spp. The NTC compounds are prodrugs that require activation by specific nitroreductases within the bacterial cell for their anti-bacterial activity. They are bactericidal in vitro and efficacious in a mouse thigh infection model.

## Results

### Hit identification and optimization

In the quest to discover novel hits against Gram-negative bacteria, a diverse set of 3000 compounds from a commercially available chemical library (Emolecules database) were screened against WT E. coli CGSC#7636 (BW25113), E. coliacrB JW0451-2, and E. colitolC JW5503-1 in a whole-cell based growth inhibition assay. The reason for choosing specific knockout strains was to pick compounds with narrow differences in MIC values between the ∆acrB and ∆tolC strains and sieve out compounds possessing multiple efflux pump liabilities. Our objective was to progress those compounds that have specific AcrB efflux liability and can be optimized for WT antibacterial activity. Screening 3000 compounds yielded 181 active compounds (MIC ≤ 80 µg/ml) against E. coli ΔtolC and of these only seven of them had MIC against E. coliacrB JW0451-2. None of these compounds had any activity against the WT. Seven hits that showed activity on ΔacrB were considered for further evaluation against 15 single gene knockouts of various efflux pump components (Table S1). MIC data indicated that all the 7 compounds were subjected to efflux only through AcrB (Table S1). Due to its potent MIC, and considering the typical hit evaluation parameters such as molecular weight (<500), lipophilicity (LogP/logD <5), number of hydrogen bond donors/acceptors (HBD < 5 and HBA < 10) and synthetic feasibility, compound 7 was taken forward for further optimization.

In order to decipher the SAR requirements for antibacterial activity, the middle methyl substituted thiazole core, and distal phenyl ring on the left-hand side (LHS) was kept constant (compound 8) and the initial chemistry efforts were directed towards changes on the right-hand side (RHS) nitro thiophene ring (Fig. 1a). None of these modifications yielded compounds with activity against WT bacteria. Instead, such changes made the compound weaker against ∆acrB and ∆tolC strains. These observations indicated that the RHS nitro thiophene group is essential for primary target interaction. In case of compound 9, an electronegative fluorine group at the para position of LHS phenyl ring retained the MIC against acrB and tolC mutant strains, whereas compound 10 with additional N,N′-dimethyl basic group on the thiazole ring (to compound 9) reduced MIC by four fold in ∆tolC compared to 9. However, none of these modifications provided any SAR handle towards mitigating efflux liability, implying that the nitro thiophene ring may be critical for interaction with unknown target/s that could be bringing about the growth inhibition of the efflux deficient strains.

Computational molecular docking simulations were performed to evaluate the interaction pattern of compound 7 with the AcrB efflux pump and for applying a structure-based design approach to reduce the efflux pump liabilities. The output (dock poses) of Autodock Vina15 blind docking in EcAcrB protein structure was imported into PyMOL16 viewer and visualised. Similar computational docking studies of various antibiotics by Hiroshi Nikaido and group demonstrated that indeed most compounds bind to a phenylalanine rich aromatic cage17. We too observed that a high number of poses clustered in the distal binding pocket made primarily of aromatic residues such as F136, F178, Y327, F610, F615, F617 and F628. The RHS thiophene ring of compounds formed hydrophobic contacts with I277 residue and the nitro group of thiophene ring formed a hydrogen bond with Q151 residue (Fig. 1b). The middle core thiazole ring interacted with F178, and F615 residues and the LHS phenyl ring entered into the bottom of distal binding pocket which is lined by F136, Y327, F610 and F628 residues.

Phenylalanine-Arginine Beta-Naphthylamide (PAβN) is a known efflux pump inhibitor that binds to the distal binding pocket/phenylalanine cage of AcrB17. Compound 7 that lacks MIC against WT E. coli (Fig. 2), exhibited potent activity (MIC < 0.3 µg/ml) in the presence of PAβN indicating that it binds to the phenylalanine cage before being subjected to efflux. Compound 7 binding to the distal site of AcrB binding pocket was further evaluated by its competition with Nile red in a whole-cell efflux assay. Earlier studies have proven that, besides the known inhibitors like PAβN, several tetracyclic compounds (doxorubicin, minocycline, chlortetracycline, doxycycline, and tetracycline) and tetraphenylphosphonium chloride interfere with the efflux of the dye Nile red18. In our experiments (Table S2), PAβN shows strong competition with Nile red by completely blocking its efflux at a low concentration (Tefflux50 >200 Sec at 1 µM). Similarly, compound 7 slows down (Fig. 3 and Table S2) the Nile red efflux significantly (Tefflux50 >200 Sec at 9 µM). Based on these observations we deduced that compound 7 binds to distal pocket/ phenylalanine cage of AcrB.

Next, we attempted to modify the LHS phenyl ring which was predicted to interact with the deep hydrophobic pocket that is lined with several aromatic/hydrophobic residues. Our primary intention with such an approach was to disturb the interaction with the phenylalanine cage residues. Subtle modifications capable of modulating electrostatic potential/electron density of LHS ring at ortho, meta and para positions of the phenyl ring were attempted (Fig. 2). Introduction of small electronegative fluorine at meta & para (compound 11) and ortho & para (compound 12) of LHS ring alleviated the efflux leading to WT activity (0.6 µg/ml). Additionally, an introduction of electron donating methyl and methoxy substituent at ortho or meta positions while keeping para fluoro substitution constant (compounds 13, 18 and 19) also provided similar activity against E. coli WT. Introduction of para nitrile group (compound 14) was detrimental as the compound showed >100 fold loss in MIC against ∆tolC compared to compound 12. This data demonstrated that para nitrile substitution might not be favourable for primary target interaction. Replacing para nitrile with fluoro (compound 15) brought back WT activity. The progression of compound 20 to 22 having para chloro substitution along with methoxy, fluoro and ethoxy groups on meta position of LHS ring respectively provided potent antibacterial activities in WT E. coli.

Thermal shift assay with CPM (7-diethylamino-3-(4′-maleimidylphenyl)-4-methylcoumarin) dye helped ascertain the differences in affinity of AcrB binding to compound 7 and compound 12. The ∆Tm is minimal in the case of compound 12 as compared to compound 7 (see Fig. 3a,b and Table S2). Compound 15 and compound 20 showed <2 °C shift in ∆Tm as compared to the protein alone (Fig. 3c,d). The compound 12 with a Tefflux50 of 68 seconds is less competitive as compared to the initial hit compound 7 that has a Tefflux50 of >200 seconds when tested with 400 µM of compound in the Nile red efflux assay (Fig. 3e,f). Dose response curves (7 doses from 1 µM to 400 µM) indicate that compound 15 and 20 compete with Nile red in the efflux assay while compound 12 does not show competition (Fig. 3f–h and Table S2). Both the efflux assay and the thermal shift analyses support that the compounds with wild-type MIC activity indeed have less efflux liability as compared to compound 7.

To discern the differences in interaction at the molecular level between compound 7 and compound 12, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed for AcrB:ligand complexes. The reduced model (Figure S1a) of AcrB protein that was proposed by Vargiu & Nikaido and validated by several other groups19,20 were considered for the current study. Initial MD simulation trajectory analyses revealed that both the simulations converged (Figure S2a) within 3 Å backbone RMSD (root mean square deviation). Ligand RMSD analyses demonstrated an elevation of RMSD (around 10 ns simulation time) in case of compound 12 suggesting a probable difference in binding mode (Figure S2b). Further fragmentation of RMSD for RHS, LHS portions showed a drift in RMSD related to the LHS part and not from RHS (Figure S2c and d). To capture the binding mode differences, residual decomposition analyses (Table S3) was performed using 1500 snapshots (every 10th snapshot from 10000 to 25000 ps). This analysis demonstrated that compound 7 indeed maintained all the hydrophobic interactions (Movie S1) with the phenylalanine cage as predicted by molecular docking (Figures S1b,c and S3a) whereas compound 12 lost several hydrophobic interactions and formed hydrophilic interactions with distal pocket residues (Figures S1d,e and S3b).

### Bactericidality and evaluation against clinical isolates

Compounds 15 and 20 were evaluated for their bactericidal activities. Ciprofloxacin was used as a reference drug (Fig. 4a–c) for these assays. Killing kinetics data shown in Fig. 4 indicated that compounds 15 and 20 were as bactericidal as ciprofloxacin. The bactericidal activity of a compound can be assessed using two parameters. Firstly, the MBC/MIC ratio, wherein the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) indicates that concentration of the antibacterial agent that leads to 99.9% reduction in bacterial survival in a 24-hour period. The second parameter is the time taken to attain the 99.9% reduction. Compounds 15, 20 & ciprofloxacin achieved 99.9% reduction between 6–8 hours at 2–4X MIC. In addition, total kill (below the limit of quantitation, LOQ) was observed with both compounds at 8 hours and at 8X MIC. The kill rate appeared better for ciprofloxacin, reaching the limit of quantification at 6 hours and at 8X MIC.

Next, we evaluated compounds 12, 15 and 20 for their antibacterial activity against a panel of seventy five E. coli clinical isolates (Supporting File SI2). These clinical isolates were of recent origin and exhibited a range of susceptibilities to the standard drugs, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, nitrofurantoin and gentamicin. Four isolates were susceptible to the four standard drugs, and nine were resistant to all the four classes as per EUCAST breakpoint guidelines21. The remaining isolates were resistant to one or two of the drugs. The range of MICs, MIC50 (MIC of 50% of the tested isolates) and MIC90 (MIC of 90% of the isolates) are shown in Fig. 4d and Table S4.

### Cytotoxicity

Compounds 12, 15 and 20 were tested for cytotoxicity in A549 cell line using MTS ((3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium)) assay. The IC50 were 16.9, 10.2, and 8.3 µg/ml, respectively. Staurosporine was used as a reference drug in this study (Figure S4).

### Target Identification

To identify the putative target, we performed a MIC screen with the compounds of interest against 700 E. coli mutants, each of them has a deletion of a single non-essential gene22. Those mutants that have an altered MIC could provide an insight of the potential target/pathway23 and eventually implicate the possible mode of action. The single gene knockout of nfsB showed a significantly elevated MIC (>40 µg/ml) as compared to the WT implying that this gene may be involved in the antibacterial activity of these compounds. Nitro-heterocyclic compounds are known substrates for nitroreductases NfsB and NfsA in E. coli24,25,26. Earlier studies have demonstrated that the biological activity of nitro-aromatic and nitro-heterocyclic compounds like nitrofurantoin is observed only after the reduction of the nitro moiety25. Since our current series of compounds are NTC derivatives, these were hypothesized to being activated by bacterial nitroreductases, in a manner similar to nitrofurantoin.

To test this hypothesis, we generated resistant mutants of the E. coli strain BW25113 for compound 11 and compound 15 by plating them on agar plates containing 2x, 4x, 8x and 16x MIC of the respective compounds. The resistance frequency was found to be 10−7 and 10−8 for compounds 11 and 15 respectively (Table S5). The nfsB gene and its regulatory regions in 10 mutants were sequenced and a frame-shift mutation was observed at base 347 (amino acid residue 116) in the presence of both compounds (compound 11 and 15). The identified mutations were mapped to its 3D structure (PDB ID: 1YKI) to understand the functional relevance of such variations. As shown in Figure S5a, residues after 116 were crucial for FMN (Flavin mononucleotide) tricyclic ring and phosphate binding. It is presumed that the frameshift mutation disturbs the active site pocket thereby altering the enzyme activity (Figure S5a). A similar effect was expected from second frameshift mutation, which appeared at base 423 (amino acid residue 141). A point mutation (V143F) was observed in case of compound 15. The V143 residue was within 4 Å vicinity to FMN binding pocket, and the side chain of the valine was surrounded by several hydrophobic residues (Figure S5b). Valine is a small hydrophobic residue and mutations with bulkier aromatic side chain (phenylalanine) could cause severe steric clashes with surrounding residues thereby disturbing the architecture of the FMN binding pocket. Mutations were not observed in the acrB gene of these mutants, confirming that the resistance was not due to changes in the acrB that could have caused increased efflux of the compounds.

To assess the biological relevance of the interacting protein and establish the link between nitroreductases to the antibacterial activity of NTC compounds, single (ΔnfsA or ΔnfsB) and double knockouts (ΔnfsA & ΔnfsB) of nitroreductases were generated by phage transduction using strains from the Keio collection22. The rationale behind the selection of these knockouts was based on the observation that the drug nitrofurantoin showed an elevation of the MIC in single knockouts and about 8-fold elevation in the double knockout, implicating the role of both enzymes in nitro group reduction. Similarly, compounds 12, 15 and 20 showed partial MIC elevation in single knockouts (ΔnfsA) and were completely inactive in ΔnfsA and ΔnfsB double knockout strain (Table S6). The compound 14 (negative control) was inactive and did not show any difference in either single or double knockout strains.

### Nitroreductase assay

To establish the biochemical activity and also validate the microbiological results that showed better conversion by ΔnfsA than ΔnfsB strain (Table S6), the two enzymes were purified (Figure S6) and their activities were assessed with the NTC compounds. It was seen that the representative set of compounds having WT MICs are more efficiently converted by NfsB into their active forms compared to NfsA as shown in the activity profile of individual compounds with both NfsA and NfsB nitroreductases using NADPH and NADH as co-substrates respectively (Fig. 5). Correlation of enzyme activity with that of ∆nfsA MICs suggests that the cellular activity of NfsB helps in retention of WT MIC by compounds even in the absence of NfsA. Compound 14 has no WT MIC and is not converted by either NfsA or NfsB in the biochemical assay providing evidence for their role in the activation of these compounds into their antibacterial forms within the cells. The low solubility of the compounds/substrates under the NfsA and NfsB assay conditions precluded determination of their Km. Therefore, a quantitative measure of the test compound affinities towards the enzyme was obtained by comparing the slopes of the initial velocities of the reactions at a concentration of 40 μM NADH/NADPH and 10 nM NfsA or 70 nM NfsB with 20 μM compounds (Table S7).

### Pharmacokinetics and In vivo Efficacy

These studies were performed as per CPCSEA, Govt. of India approved protocols (Registration number 1610/RO/c/12/CPCSEA), and also following approval by the Institutional Animals Ethics Committee (IAEC). The pharmacokinetics (PK) of compounds 12 and 15 was performed in BALB/c mice following either as a single intravenous dose of 2 mg/kg or single oral dose of 10 mg/kg. All the mice were visibly normal post dose and throughout the study. The Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis for compounds 12 & 15 is shown in Tables S8 and S9. These compounds exhibited moderate to high clearance, with an oral bioavailability of approximately 15–25%. Following 100 mg/kg oral dose, exposures achieved were sufficiently above the MIC, which prompted the evaluation of the compounds in an in vivo efficacy study.

In a thigh infection BALB/c mice model, compound 15 was found to be significantly bactericidal with a clear dose response when tested against an efflux pump deficient E. coli strain, ∆acrB JW0451-2, the WT E. coli strain BW25113 and a clinical isolate of E. coli (Fig. 6a–c and Table S10). No difference was observed between the efficacy of the efflux deficient and competent WT strain, indicating that the absence of any efflux liability under in vivo conditions. Compound 12 was tested only against the clinical isolate and was found to be significantly bactericidal (Fig. 6c and Table S10).

## Discussion

AcrAB-TolC and its RND homologs in Gram-negative pathogens are involved in the efflux of a wide range of antibiotics and hence considered as the most clinically relevant pumps. AcrB inactivation either by deletion or with inhibitors, triggers overexpression of other efflux pumps such as AcrF or AcrD that could aid in making the bacteria refractory to antibiotic action27,28,29. On the other hand, the efflux mitigation strategy described here resulted in neither compensatory activation of other pumps nor any mutations in AcrB. These conclusions are based on the observation that there is no difference in MIC between ΔacrB & ΔtolC knockouts and absence of any changes in acrB gene sequence in the mutants raised against these compounds. Our MD simulations approach demonstrated that the interactions with conventional hydrophobic cage residues diminished for compound 12 while compound 7 that has efflux liability maintained the interactions (Figures S1c,e and S7a,b). Compound 12 showed variable interaction pattern by forming hydrogen bond interactions with G288 and S287 (Figures S1e and S3b). An earlier report indicated that G288 is one of the critical hotspot residues in the distal binding pocket and G288D mutation in MDR clinical isolates of Salmonella typhimurium primarily altered specificity towards antibacterial drugs20. To validate the MD simulation observations, we also modelled compound 24 and it revealed an interaction pattern similar to the efflux liable compound 7. It did not show hydrophilic interactions with G288 or S287 but maintained all hydrophobic interactions (Figure S3c). These observations were confirmed by evaluating MICs against E. coli WT and pump deletion mutants, which demonstrated compound 24 to be efflux liable (Fig. 2). SAR studies of the compounds 11, 12, 15 and 24 revealed that the p-fluoro group is vital for overcoming efflux. Among these four, only compound 24 lacks the p-fluoro group, hence, behaves like compound 7. Small hydrophobic substitutions such as methyl or methoxy at the para position also help to overcome efflux. Additionally, SAR studies revealed that the modification of unsubstituted LHS phenyl ring altered the interaction pattern with the phenylalanine cage along with hydrophilic interactions with the hotspot residues, and thus explaining the modulation of efflux. These observations were further corroborated by Thermal shift based binding assay and the dose-dependent Nile red competition assay.

Some of the WT active hit compounds exhibited bactericidal activities comparable with known antibacterial drugs along with potent MIC90 on multi-drug resistant E. coli clinical isolates. Several pathogenic E. coli strains were resistant to four different classes of known antibiotics whereas the NTC derivatives are active on most of them (Table S4). Mode of action studies led to the identification of NfsB as the enzyme that activates these compounds that brings about the antibacterial effect. Single and double gene knockouts of E. coli nitroreductases, the NfsA & NfsB enzyme assays further substantiated that NfsB is the primary activator. Compounds within the series showed moderate MIC elevation in single gene knockout (ΔnfsA or ΔnfsB) strains and were completely inactive in the double gene knockout (ΔnfsA & ΔnfsB) strain. This evidence demonstrated the specificity of NTC activation by NfsB and NfsA unlike nitrofurantoin that is partially active even in the double knockout strain implying its activation by other non-specific enzymes (Table S6). Co-crystal structure of E. coli NfsB bound to cofactor FMN and nitrofurazone revealed that NfsB was a dimeric protein of 217 amino acids per polypeptide chain with one FMN cofactor per subunit30 and two nitrofurazone compounds were observed near FMN binding pocket (PDB ID: 1YKI). Molecular docking predicted that the binding mode for NTC derivatives with NfsB was such that the nitro group occupied an identical position to that of nitrofurazone warhead. The remaining part of NTC derivative bridges the dimer interfaces of NfsB (Figure S8a,b). Upon comparing E. coli NfsB sequence with its homologs from other pathogenic bacteria like Klebsiella pneumoniae, Shigella flexneri, Shigella sonnei and Salmonella typhimurium, a high sequence identity of ≥80%, as well as active-site pocket similarity was observed (Figure S8c). This analysis implies that these NTC derivatives could possess potent antibacterial activities against these bacterial pathogens too. K. pneumoniae nitroreductase nfnB on a plasmid vector was used to genetically complement the E. coli triple knockout of nfsA, nfsB & acrB and test the MICs of the NTC derivatives against this strain. The NTC compounds when tested against such a complemented strain, revealed that the heterologous nitroreductase from K. pneumoniae is able to activate them resulting in the MIC being restored in the triple knockout E. coli strain (Table S11). Evaluation of compounds 12, 15 and 20 against WT K. pneumoniae ATCC strain revealed reasonable MICs. The 4-8 fold lower potency of these compounds in comparison to E. coli WT MIC could be attributed to differences in either compound permeability and/or efflux pumps in K. pneumoniae. Nevertheless, this data demonstrated that the E. coli AcrB efflux mitigation strategy indeed holds good with the K. pneumoniae AcrB homolog. Similarly, potent MICs were also observed against clinical isolates like Shigella flexneri, Shigella sonnei and Salmonella typhimurium (Table S11).

Our work describes an innovative strategy to discover novel antibacterial compounds. The approach involves overcoming efflux liability by reducing the binding to AcrB, thereby mitigating their efflux liability. We started with efflux liable compounds and optimised them to obtain activity against wild-type bacteria. Such a strategy paves the way for the identification of novel antibacterial chemotypes that are pivotal to tackle the resistance risk posed by multi-drug resistant bacterial strains.

## Methods

### Determination of MIC and MBC

MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) of wild-type E. coli CGSC#7636 (BW25113), E. coliacrB JW0451-2, and E. colitolC JW5503-1 were determined  in M9 medium according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The inoculum used for all the experiments is derived from a single seed lot that is maintained as glycerol stocks at −80 °C and are sub cultured on LB plate for isolated colonies. Single colony of each strain is grown in M9 medium. All test compound stocks and dilutions are prepared in DMSO. Serial two-fold dilutions of compounds are prepared separately, with the concentrations ranging from 2 mg/mL to 0.015 mg/mL. To 150 µl (3–7 × 105 CFU/ml) of bacterial culture in 96 well microtitre plates, 3 μL compound from each of the dilutions is added to respective wells to obtain final concentrations ranging from 40 µg/mL to 0.3 µg/mL of the test compounds. Media control, culture control and appropriate reference drug controls are included. The plates are packed in gas permeable polythene bags and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Growth is monitored by checking absorbance at 600 nm (A600). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is taken as the concentration that result in a growth inhibition of ≥80%. The samples from MIC and above concentrations are plated for MBC (Minimum Bactericidal Concentration). The samples are diluted 1:10 and plated on LB agar plates. Plates are incubated at 37 °C overnight and number of surviving colonies are enumerated. MBC is considered as the lowest concentration which shows 99.9% kill from the start CFU. The killing kinetics is determined by enumerating survivors at various time points following compound exposure. E. coli cells (~107 CFU/ml; A600 of 0.1) are treated with various concentrations (40 µg/mL to 0.3 µg/mL) of compounds in a 96-well microtitre plate. At various time intervals (0 to 8 h), 30 μl volumes of treated cultures are serially diluted and plated on LB agar plates. The plates are incubated at 37 °C overnight, and the bacterial colonies are enumerated. Data is expressed as the log10 CFU for each drug treatment.

### Resistant mutations prediction

Spontaneous resistant mutants are raised against compounds using a single step selection method. Mid-logarithmic phase culture of E. coli is centrifuged and concentrated 10-fold to achieve a bacterial number of ~109 CFU/mL. Varying dilutions of the bacterial culture are plated onto compound containing plates (corresponding to 2x, 4x, and 8x MIC concentration). Appropriate dilutions of the bacterial culture are also plated on drug-free LB agar to enumerate the bacterial numbers in the culture. Plates are incubated for 24 hrs at 37 °C and the CFUs in drug containing and drug free plates are enumerated. The spontaneous rate of resistance was calculated by dividing the number of colonies on drug containing plates (at a given concentration) divided by the total number of viable bacteria estimated on drug-free plates. Resistant colonies are randomly picked from the drug containing plates and grown in MH broth to determine their level of resistance against the specific, compound as well as, other standard drugs with different mechanisms of action.

### Target Identification

The wild-type E. coli strain BW25113 and the entire Keio collection of knockouts22 is maintained as glycerol stocks at −80 °C in 96-well deep well blocks. Using a proprietary algorithm, we have identified about 700 non-essential gene knockouts that can be used for target identification. These are sub cultured in 150 µl of LB broth (Kanamycin 50 ug/ml, except for the wild-type strain) in 96 well microtiter plates and then adapted into M9 medium with 0.4% glucose. From these plates, a 2 µl inoculum of 106 to 107 CFU/ml is transferred to 150 µl per well of medium in microtitre plates containing compound 12 or compound 20 at 0, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.25 µg/ml. Plates are incubated overnight at 37 °C and growth or its inhibition was monitored by measuring the absorption (A600) using a plate reader. Cultures of single gene knockouts that show an altered MIC as compared to that of the wild type are scored as ‘Hits’.

#### Over-expression and purification of AcrB

AcrB overexpression protocol is adopted from Du. et al.31. Full length acrB gene was amplified from E. coli. BW25113 using Forward Primer 5′-GCCCATATGCCTAATTTCTTTATCGA-3′ Reverse Primer 5′-GCCGCTATTCAATGATGATCGACAGTAT-3′ and cloned into the plasmid pET21a. The resultant plasmid that would express AcrB with a C-terminal His-tag is transformed into E. coli strain C43(DE3). The cells are induced on reaching A600 = 0.6 and transferred to 18 °C. The culture is harvested by centrifugation and re-suspended in Buffer A (100 mM Sodium Phosphate, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Imidazole, pH = 7.4, 100 µg/ml protease inhibitor cocktail from Roche and 5 U/ml DNase I and 5 mg/ml lysozyme). The cells are lysed at 15000 psi using Emulsiflex and centrifuged at 8000 g for removing cell debris. The membrane is isolated by centrifuging the resultant supernatant at 125000 g (see Coomassie stained SDS-PAGE of the purified protein Figure S9). Membrane solubilisation is done using Buffer A and 1.5% DDM (n-Dodecyl-β-D-Maltoside). Ni-NTA chromatography is used to purify the His-tagged protein and eluted in Buffer A with 300 mM Imidazole and 1.5% DDM.

### Thermal Shift Assay

The assay is performed according to protocols established elsewhere32. CPM (N- [4-(7-diethylamino-4-methyl-3-coumarinyl) phenyl] maleimide) is a thiol specific fluorochrome (Excitation 387 nm, Emission 463 nm) and is non-fluorescent in an unbound state. The proteins, on thermal unfolding exposes cysteines allowing the CPM to bind and fluoresce. Here, AcrB protein at a final concentration of 0.125 µM along with 20 µM of CPM in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol and 0.03% DDM is used for the assay. The thermal denaturation is performed in a fluorimeter that is heated from 25 to 90 °C at a ramp rate of 1 °C/min. The Tm is calculated by analysing the melting profiles using Boltzmann Sigmoid function (GraphPad Prism) and ∆Tm is calculated by measuring the difference between the Tm of inhibitor bound protein and the apo-protein.

### Nile red efflux assay

The Nile red assay is adopted from Bohnert et al.18. An overnight culture of E. coli strain BW25113 is harvested and is resuspended in 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 1 mM MgCl2 (PPB). The cells are adjusted to an A660 of 1.0 in PPB and aliquoted into glass tubes (2 ml each). Carbonylcyanide-m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP; a protonophore that uncouples the electron transport chain and thus inhibits AcrB mediated efflux) is added to a final concentration of 10 µM (5 mM stock solution in 50% DMSO) and incubated for 15 minutes before adding the potential competitor at desired concentrations. Nile red is then added (stock solution of 5 mM in 10% dimethyl formamide-90% ethanol [vol/vol]) to a final concentration of 5 µM. The cell suspension is incubated at room temperature on a shaker for 3 hours. The cells are harvested and resuspended in 2 ml PPB in the presence of the competitor. The cell suspension is aliquoted in a fluorimeter cuvette, to which, 100 µl of 1 M Glucose is added to activate the electron transport chain. The rate of efflux is measured by Tefflux50, it is the time taken for 50% of Nile red to be effluxed out in presence of the compounds. The fluorescence is measured (Excitation 552 nm, Emission 636 nm) for 200 seconds.

### Cloning, expression and purification of E. coli nfsA and nfsB

The nfsA gene was PCR amplified using the primers 5′TTCCATGGATATCATTTCTGTCGC3′ and 5′CTTCCATGGATATCATTTCTGTCGC3′. Likewise, the nfsB gene was amplified using the primers 5′TTCCATGGATATCATTTCTGTCGC3′ and 5′CTTCCATGGATATCATTTCTGTCGC3′ from E. coli BW25113 and cloned into the pET28a vector to produce pET-nfsA and pET-nfsB plasmids. Recombinant NfsA and NfsB proteins are over-expressed using these plasmids in E. coli BL21(DE3) strain following standard procedures33. In brief, the pET-nfsA and pET-nfsB plasmid transformed BL21(DE3) cells are grown in 300 ml LB-broth with 50 μg/ml Kanamycin at 37 °C to an A600 of 0.6, induced with 200 μM IPTG and continued incubation for 3 hours before harvesting the cells. The soluble His-tagged NfsA and NfsB proteins are purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography followed by Gel permeation chromatography elution using 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8 containing 150 mM NaCl. The fractions corresponding to dimer peaks are pooled, concentrated (see Coomassie stained SDS-PAGE of the purified protein Figure S6), and stored at −70 °C after addition of 10% glycerol and 1 mM EDTA. Protein concentrations are determined using BSA as a standard with Bradford reagent.

### Nitroreductase activity assay

Enzyme reducing each of the substrates are measured by monitoring the concomitant oxidation of NADPH by NfsA and NADH by NfsB in a fluorescence based assay. The reduction in fluorescence due to the NADH oxidation (excitation 350 nm, emission 460 nm) and NADPH oxidation (excitation 340 nm, emission 485 nm) is recorded using a TECAN Infinite M200Pro spectrophotometer, in half area solid black microtiter plates. This change in fluorescence directly corelates to the reduction of the nitro-compounds in the reaction. The NfsA assays is performed by initiating the reactions with 40 μM NADPH and 10 nM NfsA in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM EDTA against 20 μM substrate (5 μl of compounds/substrate dissolved in 100% DMSO) in a total reaction volume of 100 μl at 25 °C. Similarly, the NfsB assay is also performed by initiating the reactions with 40 μM NADH and 70 nM NfsB in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM EDTA against 20 μM substrate in a total reaction volume of 100 μl. These are the optimal conditions arrived at by titrating the enzyme between 2.5 nM–100 nM, NADH/NADPH between 10 and 100 µM, DMSO between 0 and 15% for its tolerance and solubility of the compounds/substrate. All reactions are performed in replicates of two or more and the fluorescence measurements are made at 10 second intervals for 5–10 minutes.

### Measurement of reaction rates for ranking of compounds

Low solubility of the compounds/substrates under the NfsA and NfsB assay conditions precluded determination of their Km. To establish a quantitative measure of the test compound affinities towards the enzyme, an approach of comparing the slopes of the initial velocities of the reactions at a fixed concentration of 40 μM NADH/NADPH and 10 nM NfsA or 70 nM NfsB with 20 μM compounds was adopted. The relative fluorescence units (RFU) obtained due to NADPH (excitation 340 nm, emission 485 nm) or NADH (excitation 350 nm, emission 460 nm) oxidation of the first 90 sec reaction is used to compute the slopes using linear regression analysis on GraphPad Prism. Appropriate blank reactions are included to account for background fluorescence/quenching from each of the components such as DMSO, the compound itself and auto-oxidation of NADPH or NADH. Activity of NfsB with a known substrate such as nitrofurantoin is used as a benchmark to plot the relative activities with all the test compounds. Though this data does not provide a precise measure such as kcat and Km, comparison of the slopes of these initial velocities enables ranking of the compounds based on their affinity towards the enzyme.

#### Cytotoxicity studies

Cytotoxicity of the compounds was evaluated using MTS ((3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium)) assay. A-549 cells were seeded in a 96 well plate at a density if 1.5 × 104 cells/well (100 μL). The cells were cultured in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C. A ten point concentration curve was set up starting from 5 nM to 100 μM with 3 fold dilution along with positive, negative and blank controls. The final concentration of DMSO was maintained at 1% throughout the plate. The compound treatment was carried out for 24 hrs. After incubation MTS reagent was added followed by 30 min incubation. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm. Data analysis was done using GraphPad Prism 6.0.

### Autodock molecular docking

Blind docking experiments were performed for the hit molecule (compound 7) by Autodock Vina 1.115. The minocycline bound EcAcrB crystal structure (PDB ID: 4DX5) was considered for these experiments. AutoDock Vina 1.1, is an open-source program for docking simulations. It uses the Iterated Local Search global optimizer algorithm in which a succession of steps consisting of a mutation and a local optimization are taken, with each step being accepted according to the Metropolis criterion. In the present study, we have utilized the AutoDock plugin that can be incorporated in PyMOL, to analyze the binding sites and prepare the input parameters for AutoDock Vina runs. The grid for blind docking runs was generated based on the available data. Earlier reports demonstrated that the Thumb region is important for trimer stability and efflux as demonstrated by P223G mutation34. The docking grid generated covers the periplasmic region of EcAcrB except the thumb region and inner membrane region. The receptor structural information required by the program (the pdbqt files) were generated using PyMOL with the AutoDock plugin, and the ligand pdbqt files were generated by utilizing scripts included in the Molecular Graphics Laboratory (MGL) tools.635.

### Molecular Dynamics simulations

Initial binding orientations of bound ligands were obtained from molecular docking studies with AcrB efflux pump. Reduced AcrB model generated based on residue list provided in earlier literature19. Force field parameters for ligands were created with the Antechamber program36 from the Amber14 package using the General Amber Force Field (GAFF) and AM1-BCC37,38, partial charges. All molecular dynamics simulations were performed using the Amber14 molecular dynamics package and the Amber99SB39 force field. Energy minimization and MD was carried out with PMEMD. A total of four minimization steps were executed prior to the heating step. For minimization, restraints employed a harmonic force constant of 100.0 kcal/(mol · Å2). First, each ligand molecule was minimized with restraints applied to all protein heavy atoms. Next, the total system (protein and ligand) was minimized with no restraints. Each minimized system was then inserted in a water box of TIP3P water, which extended at least 10 Å away from any given protein atom, and neutralized by adding counter ions. Solvent molecules were then minimized while restraining all protein and ligand heavy atoms. Finally, all restraints were removed and the total system (protein, ligand, and solvent) was minimized. Each energy minimization procedure used the steepest descent method for the first 3000 steps and then conjugated gradient method for the subsequent 2000 steps. After energy minimization, the system was slowly heated from 0 to 300.0 K over 400 ps in the NPT ensemble under 1 atm pressure to equilibrate the solvent. A harmonic restraint weight of 5.0 kcal/(mol · Å2) was applied to all heavy atoms in this first 400 ps. An additional MD equilibration of 200 ps was performed with a decreased restraint weight of 2.0 kcal/(mol · Å2), followed by a final equilibration lasting 200 ps with no restraints. Production MD simulations of 25 ns each were carried out without any restraint at a temperature of 300.0 K and a pressure of 1 atm. Unless otherwise noted, all MD simulations used a time step of 2 fs, periodic boundary conditions were employed, and all electrostatic interactions were calculated using the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method40. A 10.0 Å cutoff was used to calculate the direct space sum of PME, and bond lengths involving bonds to hydrogen atoms were constrained using the SHAKE algorithm41. The coordinates were stored every 10 ps for each production MD run. Ligand RMSD was measured by utilizing the Amber analyses tool PTRAJ. Ligand RMSD values were computed by aligning the protein backbone from MD snapshots and using the “nofit” option for ligand molecule. These amber trajectories were converted to Desmond molecular software readable formats (.cms) for further analyses. Simulation Interactions Diagram method incorporated in Desmond module42 of Schrodinger was used to read the converted trajectories and generate ligand interaction diagrams. Residual decomposition analyses by MM/GBSA method was performed using 1500 snapshots (every 10th snapshot from 10000 to 25000 ps).

### In vivo pharmacokinetic studies of compound 12 and 15 in BALB/c mice

#### Intravenous Pharmacokinetics

These studies were performed as per CPCSEA, Govt. of India approved protocols (Registration number 1610/RO/c/12/CPCSEA), and also following approval by the Institutional Animals Ethics Committee (IAEC).

The test substances were formulated in the vehicle DMSO: PEG400: Ethanol (absolute): Water at ratio of 10:40:20:30 (v/v). The required quantity of test compound was weighed, transferred into a vial and dissolved using the appropriate volumes of DMSO, PEG400, Ethanol (absolute) and sterile water in a sequential manner until a clear solution was obtained. The test substance was administered intravenously as a bolus via the tail vein at a dose volume of 5 ml/kg.

#### Oral Pharmacokinetics

The test substances were formulated in 10% DMSO in 0.25% carboxy methyl cellulose. 40 mg of the test compounds were weighed and transferred into a mortar followed by the addition of 0.4 ml of DMSO to dissolve the compound. Then 3.6 ml of 0.25% of CMC was added in aliquots to the DMSO solution, with constant grinding using a pestle until a uniform suspension was obtained. The final concentration of the compound was 10 mg/ml. The compounds were administered orally, by gavage, at a dose volume of 10 ml/kg.

#### Sampling

At 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, and 24 h time points, and prior to sampling, mice were anaesthetized with isoflurane. From each mouse, two blood samples were drawn; the 1st was non-terminal (0.1 ml) and the 2nd terminal, by retro-orbital plexus puncture using heparanised capillary tubes. Blood was collected in 2 ml Eppendorf tubes containing 0.01 ml of 10% K2EDTA as anticoagulant, mixed gently and placed in ice before centrifugation. Blood was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min, and plasma was harvested and stored at −80 °C until bioanalysis.

#### Bioanalysis

Ultrafast liquid chromatography mass spectrometric method was used for the estimation of test compounds in pre-clinical study samples. The analysis was performed using an API 4000 LC-MS/MS system. The interface used with the API 4000 LC-MS/MS was a Turbo Ion spray. The positive ions were measured in MRM mode. The analyte was extracted using a solid-phase extraction procedure. The data was acquired by and integrated using the Applied Biosystems “Analyst” version 1.5.2 software. Linear regression, with 1/x2 weighting was used for calibration.

#### PK Analysis

Non-compartmental (NCA) PK analysis was performed using MS Excel. The linear trapezoidal rule was used to estimate the AUC. The NCA analysis was performed using the following equations (3) on mean concentration time data:

$${\rm{AUC}}={\rm{\Sigma }}[(\text{Ci1}+\text{Ci2})/2]\ast [{\rm{ti2}}-{\rm{ti1}}]$$$${\rm{AUMC}}={\rm{\Sigma }}[(({\rm{Ci1}}\ast {\rm{ti1}})+({\rm{Ci2}}\ast {\rm{ti2}}))/2)\ast ({\rm{ti2}}-{\rm{ti1}})]$$$${{\rm{AUC}}}_{{\rm{t}}-\infty }={{\rm{Cl}}}_{{\rm{ast}}}/{{\rm{K}}}_{{\rm{el}}}$$$${{\rm{AUC}}}_{0-\infty }={{\rm{AUC}}}_{0-{\rm{t}}}+{{\rm{AUC}}}_{{\rm{t}}-\infty }$$$${{\rm{A}}{\rm{U}}{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{e}}{\rm{x}}{\rm{t}}{\rm{r}}{\rm{a}}{\rm{p}}{\rm{o}}{\rm{l}}{\rm{a}}{\rm{t}}{\rm{e}}{\rm{d}}}({\rm{ \% }})=[{{\rm{A}}{\rm{U}}{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{t}}-{\rm{\infty }}}/{{\rm{A}}{\rm{U}}{\rm{C}}}_{0-{\rm{\infty }}}]\ast 100$$

where, Ci1 and Ci2 are the concentrations at times ti1 and ti2, respectively.

$${{\rm{K}}}_{{\rm{el}}}=\,\mathrm{ln}(\text{Cx}/\text{Cy})/({\rm{ty}}-{\rm{tx}})$$

where, Kel is the first order elimination rate constant, ln is the natural logarithm, Cx and Cy are the first and last concentrations, respectively on the linear portion of the terminal phase of the concentration-time profile, and ty and tx are the corresponding time points.

$${{\rm{T}}}_{1/2}=0.693/{{\rm{K}}}_{{\rm{el}}}$$$${\rm{Cl}}={\rm{Doseiv}}/{{\rm{AUC}}}_{0-\infty }$$$${{\rm{V}}}_{{\rm{ss}}}=({{\rm{AUMC}}}_{0-\infty }/{{\rm{AUC}}}_{0-\infty })\ast ({\rm{Doseiv}}/{{\rm{AUC}}}_{0-\infty })$$

Cmax and tmax were visually estimated from the mean oral conc-time profile

$${\rm{F}}( \% )=(\text{AUCpo}/\text{AUCiv})\ast (\text{Doseiv}/\text{Dosepo})\ast 100$$

### Neutropenic Thigh Infection Efficacy Studies

In the first study (Study No: TI-2014-007), neutropenic mice were infected with 107 CFU/ml of E. coliacrB JW0451-2 in the thigh of BALB/c mice. Two hours post infection mice were treated orally with single doses of vehicle, ciprofloxacin (100 mg/kg), compound 15 (10, 30 and 100 mg/kg). Efficacy was assessed at 8 hours post infection (6 hours post treatment) by enumerating bacteria from the thigh.

In the second experiment (Study No: TI-2014-008) neutropenic mice were infected with 107 CFU/ml of E. coli strains BW25113 and E. coliacrB JW0451-2. Two hour post infection, mice were treated orally with single doses of vehicle, ciprofloxacin (100 mg/kg) and compound 15 (30 and 100 mg/kg). Efficacy was assessed at 8 hours post infection (6 hours post treatment) by estimating the bacterial counts in thighs.

In the third experiment (Study No: TI-2014-023) neutropenic mice were infected with 107 CFU/ml of a clinical isolate of E. coli (Strain No. 371, sensitive to ciprofloxacin; MIC 0.02 μg/ml), obtained from St. John’s Medical Hospital, Bengaluru. Two hours post infection, mice were treated orally with single doses of vehicle, ciprofloxacin (100 mg/kg), compound 15 (100 mg/kg), and compound 12 (100 mg/kg). Efficacy was assessed at 8 hours post infection (6 hours post treatment) by estimating the bacterial counts in thighs.

### General Chemical methods and synthesis

All commercial reagents and solvents were used without further purification. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on SiO2 plates on alumina. Visualization was accomplished by UV irradiation at 254 and 220 nm. Purity of all final derivatives for biological testing was confirmed to be >95% as determined using the following conditions. Evaporations were carried out by rotary evaporation in vacuo and work up procedures were carried out after removal of residual solids by filtration; temperatures are quoted as °C; operations were carried out at room temperature, that is typically in the range 18 to 26 °C and without the exclusion of air unless otherwise stated, or unless the skilled person would otherwise work under an inert atmosphere; column chromatography (by the flash procedure) was used to purify compounds and was performed on Merck Kiesel gel silica (Art. 9385) unless otherwise stated; in general, the course of reactions were followed by TLC, HPLC, or LC/MS and reaction times are given for illustration only; yields are given for illustration only and are not necessarily the maximum attainable; the structure of the end products of the invention was generally confirmed by NMR and mass spectral techniques. Proton magnetic resonance spectra were generally determined in DMSO d6 unless otherwise stated, using a Bruker DRX 300 spectrometer or a Bruker DRX-400 spectrometer, operating at a field strength of 300 MHz, or 400 MHz, respectively. In cases where the NMR spectrum is complex, only diagnostic signals are reported. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million downfield from tetramethylsilane as an external standard (* scale) and peak multiplicities are shown thus: s, singlet; d, doublet; dd, doublet of doublets; dt, doublet of triplets; dm, doublet of multiplets; t, triplet, m, multiplet; br, broad. Fast atom bombardment (FAB) mass spectral data were generally obtained using a Platform spectrometer (supplied by Micromass) run in electrospray and, where appropriate, either positive ion data or negative ion data were collected or using Agilent 1100 series LC/MS equipped with Sedex 75ELSD, and where appropriate, either positive ion data or negative ion data were collected. The lowest mass major ion is reported for molecules where isotope splitting results in multiple mass spectral peaks (for example when chlorine is present). Reverse Phase HPLC was carried out using YMC Pack ODS AQ (100 × 20 mmID, S 5 Å particle size, 12 nm pore size) on Agilent instruments; each intermediate was purified to the standard required for the subsequent stage and was characterized in sufficient detail to confirm that the assigned structure was correct; purity was assessed by HPLC, TLC, or NMR and identity was determined by infrared spectroscopy (IR), mass spectroscopy or NMR spectroscopy as appropriate.

### Compound 7: N-(5-Methyl-4-phenylthiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 324759-10-6,)

#### Step-1: Synthesis of 5-methyl-4-phenylthiazol-2-amine (7a)

To a stirred solution of 2-bromopropiophenone (10 g, 46.93 mM, 1 eq) in ethanol (200 mL), Thiourea (3.75 g, 49.27 mM, 1.05 equiv) was added at 25 °C. The reaction mixture was heated at 85 °C for 3 h. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was cooled to 25 °C and concentrated in vacuo to obtain crude product. The crude product was diluted with water (330 mL) and saturated Na2CO3 (16 mL) and stirred for 10 min to obtained solid which was filtered and washed with water and dried to give 8.6 g (96.52%) of 5-methyl-4-phenylthiazol-2-amine (Figure S10) as pale yellow solid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 7.56–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.29 = 7.26 (m, 1H), 6.77 (s, 2H), 2.31 (s, 3H). LCMS: Calculated for C10H10N2S = 190.26, Observed = 191.0 (M + H).

#### Step-2: Synthesis of N-(5-methyl-4-phenylthiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide

To a stirred solution of 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid (0.91 g, 5.25 mM, 1 eq) in DMF (10 mL), Diisopropylethylamine (1.7 g, 13.12 mmol, and 2.5eq) was added, followed by HATU (1.99 g, 5.25 mmol, 1equiv) at 0 °C and stirred for 30 min. After 30 min 5-methyl-4-phenylthiazol-2-amine (1 g, 5.25 mmol, 1 eq) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 12 h. The reaction mixture was poured in to ice water and extracted with ethyl acetate and the combined organic layer was dried over a Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to obtained crude product which was purified by column chromatography using neutral alumina, eluent 5-10% ethyl acetate in pet.ether to give N-(5-methyl-4-phenylthiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (compound 7) as amorphous red powder (Figure S11).

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 11.99 (bs, 1H), 7.58 (d, 1H, J = 4.4 Hz), 7.43-7.41 (m, 2H), 7.34-7.30 (m, 2H), 7.26-7.23 (m, 2H) 2.54 (s, 3H). LCMS: Calculated for C15H11N3O3S2 = 345.39, Observed = 346.2 (M + H). HPLC = 95.79% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 5 micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile.

### Compound 8: N-(5-Methyl-4-phenylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(trifluoromethyl) thiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 2147485-13-8)

To a stirred solution of 5-(trifluoromethyl)thiophene-2-carboxylic acid (0.93 g, 4.73 mM, 1 equiv) in DMF (9 mL), Diisopropylethylamine (1.52 g, 11.82 mmol, 2.5 eq) was added, followed by HATU (1.8 g, 4.73 mmol, 1 equiv) at 0 °C and stirred for 30 min. After 30 min, 5-methyl-4-phenylthiazol-2-amine (0.9 g, 4.73 mmol, 1 equiv) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 12 h. The reaction mixture was poured in to ice water when a solid precipitated out. The solid was filtered and dried. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using neutral alumina, eluent 5-10% ethyl acetate in pet ether to give 0.18 g of N-(5-methyl-4-phenylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(trifluoromethyl) thiophene-2-carboxamide (Figure S12) as pale yellow amorphous powder.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 11.56 (bs, 1H), 7.46-7.44 (m, 2H,), 7.33-7.27 (m, 3H), 7.25-7.23 (m, 1H), 7.21-7.17 (m, 1H) 2.54 (s, 3H). LCMS: Calculated for C16H11F3N2OS2 = 368.39, Observed = 369.0. HPLC = 97.71% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 5micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile.

### Compound 9: N-(4-(4-Fluorophenyl)-5-methylthiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 796081-45-3)

Compound 9 was procured from the commercial source (Enamine advanced HTS collection) and used for the screening purpose.

### Compound 10: N-(5-((dimethylamino)methyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitro thiophene-2-carboxamide

Compound 10 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 5-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-thiazol-2-amine (CAS: 955327-92-1) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 8.15-8.20 (m, 2H), 7.71 (bs, 2H), 7.32-7.34 (m, 2H), 3.68 (bs, 2H), 2.25 (s, 6H). LCMS: Calculated for C17H15FN4O3S2 = 406.45 Observed = 406.8. HPLC = 93.49% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 5micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile.

### Compound 11: N-(4-(3,4-Difluorophenyl) thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 954010-93-6)

Compound 11 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 2-amino-4-(3,4-difluorophenyl) thiazole (CAS: 175135-32-7, Alfa Aesar) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.38 (bs, 1H), 8.26-8.22 (m, 2H,), 7.99-7.94 (m, 1H), 7.87 (s, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H) 7.56-7.49 (s, 1H). LCMS: Calculated for C14H7F2N3O3S2 = 367.34, Observed = 368.0. HPLC = 96.11% (HPLC Column: ATLANTIS d C 18 (250 × 4.6) mm, 5% m Mobile phase:A:0.1% TFA in water. Mobile phase: B: Acetonitrile.

### Compound 12: N-(4-(2,4-difluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 953943-03-8)

Compound 12 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 2-amino-4-(2,4-difluorophenyl) thiazole (CAS: 105512-80-9, Alfa Aesar) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 8.27-8.22 (m, 2H,), 8.11-8.09 (m, 1H), 7.64 (s, 1H), 7.43-7.38 (m, 1H) 7.25-7.21 (m, 1H). LCMS: Calculated for C14H7F2N3O3S2 = 367.34, Observed = 368.0. HPLC = 96.94% (HPLC Column: ATLANTIS d C18 (250 × 4.6) mm, 5% m Mobile phase:A:0.1% TFA in water. Mobile phase: B: Acetonitrile.

### Compound 13: N-(4-(3-Fluoro-4-methylphenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide

Compound 13 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 2-Amino-4-(4′-fluoro-3′-methyl) phenylthiazole (CAS: 3830-48-6, Combi- Block) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.35 (bs, 1H), 8.23-8.28 (m, 2H), 7.83 (s, 1H), 7.68-7.71 (m, 2H), 7.35-7.39 (m, 1H), 2.27 (s, 3H). LCMS: Calculated for C15H10FN3O3S2 = 363.38, Observed = 364.0. HPLC = 94.24% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 5 micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B:

### Compound 14: N-(4-(4-cyanophenyl) thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 2147485-11-6)

Compound 14 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 4-(2-Amino-1,3-thiazol-4-yl) benzonitrile (CAS: 436151-85-8, Combi- Block) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.42 (bs, 1H), 8.25-8.21 (m, 2H, J = 8 Hz), 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz), 8.06 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz). LCMS: Calculated for C15H8N4O3S2 = 356.37, Observed = 357.0. HPLC = 99.21% (HPLC Column: Welchrom C18 (250 * 4.6) mm 5 micron Mobile phase A: 0.1%TFA in Water, Mobile phase B: CAN.

### Compound 15: N-(4-(4-Fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 308292-78-6)

Compound 15 (CAS: 308292-78-6) was procured from the commercial source (Life chemicals HTS compounds) and used for the screening purpose.

### Compound 16: 5-Nitro-N-(4-(4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl)thiazol-2-yl)thiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 2147485-27-4)

Compound 16 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 2-Amino-4-[4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenyl]-1,3-thiazole (CAS: 436151-95-0, Apollo Scientific Fluorine Chemicals) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.40 (bs, 1H), 8.25-8.22 (m, 2H,), 8.07-8.04 (m, 2H), 7.85 (s, 1H), 7.46-7.44 (m, 2H). LCMS: Calculated for C15H8F3N3O4S2 = 415.36, Observed = 415.8, HPLC = 98.39% (HPLC Column: ATLANTIS dC18 (250 × 4.6 mm) 5 micron, Mobile Phase A: 0.1% TFA in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile.

### Compound 17: 5-Nitro-N-(4-(6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3-yl)thiazol-2-yl)thiophene-2-carboxamide

Compound 17 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 4-[5-(trifluoromethyl) pyridin-2-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-amine (CAS: 1595798-43-8, UORSY Building Blocks Library) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = δ 13.53 (bs, 1H), 9.35 (s, 1H), 8.55-8.58 (m, 1H), 8.20-8.29 (m, 3H), 8.02 (d, J = 8.00 Hz, 1H). LCMS: Calculated for C14H7F3N4O3S2 = 400.35, Observed = 401. HPLC = 98.954% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 5 micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile.

### Compound 18: N-(4-(4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 2147485-32-1)

Compound 18 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 4-(4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl)-1,3-thiazol-2-amine (CAS: 23178-08-7, UORSY Building Blocks Library) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.33 (bs, 1H), 8.22-8.25 (m, 2H), 7.64 (s, 1H), 7.41 (s, 1H), 7.09-7.19 (m, 2H), 2.45 (s, 3H). LCMS: Calculated for C15H10FN3O3S2 = 363.38, Observed = 363.8. HPLC = 98.81% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 5 micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile.

### Compound 19: N-(4-(4-fluoro-3-methoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 2147485-25-2)

Compound 19 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 4-(4-fluoro-3-methoxyphenyl)-1,3-thiazol-2-amine (CAS: 187847-98-9, UORSY Building Blocks Library) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.37 (bs, 1H), 8.23-8.27 (m, 2H), 7.81 (s, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.60 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (s, 1H), 7.27-7.32 (m, 1H), 3.92 (s, 3H). LCMS: Calculated for C15H10FN3O4S2 = 379.38, Observed = 380.0. HPLC = 98.339% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 3 micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile.

### Compound 20: N-(4-(4-chloro-3-methoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 2147485-35-4)

#### Step 1: Synthesis of 1-chloro-4-(1-ethoxyvinyl)-2-methoxybenzene (20a)

A mixture of 4-bromo-1-chloro-2-methoxybenzene (10 g, 45.14 mM, 1.0 equiv), tributyl(1-ethoxyvinyl)stannane (17.93 g, 49.66 mM, 1.1 equiv) was taken in dry DMF at 20 °C, tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium (0) (2.6 g, 2.25 mM, 0.05 equiv) was added under N2 atmosphere and heated to 80 °C for 1 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and filtered through celite, washed with EtOAc. The combined filtrate was washed with water, brine and dried over anhy.Na2SO4. Filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product. It was purified by silica gel (60–120 mesh) column chromatography using petroleum ether: ethyl acetate (90:10) to afford 8.5 g (89%) of 1-chloro-4-(1-ethoxyvinyl)-2-methoxybenzene, 20a (Figure S13) as pale brown liquid which was used for the next step.

#### Step 2: Synthesis of 2-bromo-1-(4-chloro-3-methoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one (20b)

To a stirred solution of 1-chloro-4-(1-ethoxyvinyl)-2-methoxybenzene, 20a (8.5 g, 39.96 mM, 1.0 equiv) in THF: water (110 mL: 4 mL), N-bromosuccinimide (12.8 g, 71.94 mM, 1.8 equiv) was added at 25 °C and stirred for 24 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was filtered through celite, washed with EtOAc. The combined filtrated was concentrated under reduced pressure and the residue was taken in MTBE, washed with water, brine and dried over anhy.Na2SO4. Filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield 10 g (crude) of 2-bromo-1-(4-chloro-3-methoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one, 20b as yellow liquid. The crude product was taken as such to the next step without purification. GCMS: Calculated for C9H8BrClO2 = 263.52, Observed = 263.9.

#### Step 3: Synthesis of 4-(4-chloro-3-methoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-amine (20c)

To a stirred solution of 2-bromo-1-(4-chloro-3-methoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one, 20b (crude, 10 g) in EtOH (10 mL) at 25 °C, thiourea (2.9 g) was added and stirred for 30 min. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product. It was stirred with aq. Ammonia (25wt % in water) at 25 °C for 30 min. The solid thus obtained was filtered, washed with water and dried to afford 6.38 g (crude) of 4-(4-chloro-3-methoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-amine, 20c as pale yellow solid. It was taken as such to the next step without purification. LCMS: Calculated for C10H9ClN2OS = 240.71, Observed = 241.0

#### Step 4: Synthesis of N-(4-(4-chloro-3-methoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (compound 20)

To a stirred solution of 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid (0.45 g, 2.59 mM, 1.0 equiv) in dry dichloromethane (15 mL), triethylamine (0.7 mL, 4.48 mM, and 4.0 equiv) was added, followed by HATU (0.94 g, 2.48 mM, 1.2 equiv) at 0 °C and stirred for 30 min. Then 4-(4-chloro-3-methoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-amine, 20c (0.5 g, 2.07 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 3 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC & LCMS), the reaction mixture was diluted with dichloromethane (10 mL), washed with aqueous 10% NaHCO3 solution, brine and dried over anhy.Na2SO4. Filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product. It was stirred with methanol at 25 °C for 30 min, the solid thus obtained was filtered, washed with methanol and dried to yield 0.676 g (82%) of N-(4-(4-chloro-3-methoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide as yellow amorphous powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.39 (bs, 1H), 8.19-8.22 (m, 2H), 7.88 (s, 1H), 7.67 (s, 1H), 7.47-7.55 (m, 2H), 3.93 (s, 3H). LCMS: Calculated for C15H10ClN3O4S2 = 395.83, Observed = 396.0. HPLC = 97.48% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 5 micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile).

### Compound 21: N-(4-(4-Chloro-3-fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 2147485-26-3)

Compound 21 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 4-(4-chloro-3-fluorophenyl)-1,3-thiazol-2-amine (CAS: 1702084-35-2, UORSY Building Blocks Library) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.42 (bs, 1H), 8.23-8.26 (m, 2H), 7.94-7.97 (m, 2H), 7.82-7.85 (m, 1H), 7.67-7.71 (m, 1H). LCMS: Calculated for C14H7ClFN3O3S2 = 383.8, Observed = 384.0. HPLC = 96.93% (HPLC Column: ATLANTIS dC18 (250 × 4.6), 5micron, Mobile Phase A: 0.1% TFA in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile.

### Compound 22: N-(4-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 2147485-36-5)

#### Step 1: Synthesis of 4-bromo-1-chloro-2-ethoxybenzene (22a)

A mixture of 5-bromo-2-chlorophenol (2 g, 9.64 mM, 1.0 equiv), K2CO3 (2.66 g, 19.28 mM, 2.0 equiv), iodoethane (1.95 g, 12.493 mM, 1.3 equiv) and DMF (10 mL) was stirred at 55 °C for 3 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was poured into crushed ice and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic extracts were washed with water, brine and dried over Na2SO4. Filtered and evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product. It was purified by silica gel (60–120 mesh) column chromatography using petroleum ether: ethyl acetate (90:10) to afford 2 g (88%) of 4-bromo-1-chloro-2-ethoxybenzene, 22a (Figure S14) as colourless liquid.

#### Step 2: Synthesis of 1-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one (22b)

To stirred solution of toluene (5 mL) at −78 °C, n-Butyl lithium (2.5 M in hexane, 1.2 mL, 2.97 mMl, 1.4 equiv) was added, followed by the addition of 4-bromo-1-chloro-2-ethoxybenzene, 22a (0.5 g, 2.12 mM, 1.0 equiv) in toluene (5 mL) and stirred for 1 h. Then N,N-Dimethylacetamide (0.22 mL, 2.33 mM, 1.1 equiv) was added dropwise at −78 °C and stirred for 30 min. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was quenched with saturated NH4Cl and extracted with MTBE. The combined organic extracts were washed with water, brine and dried over a Na2SO4. Filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 0.42 g (crude) of 1-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one, 22b as colorless liquid. It was taken as such to the next step without purification.

#### Step 3: Synthesis of 2-bromo-1-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one (22c)

To a stirred solution of 1-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one, 22b (crude, 0.4 g, 2.01 mM, 1.0 equiv) in HBr in AcOH (30 wt% in AcOH, 4 mL) at 0 °C, Bromine (0.08 mL, 1.61 mM, 0.8 equiv) was added dropwise and stirred for 1 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was poured into crushed ice and extracted with MTBE. The combined organic extracts were washed with aqueous 10% NaHCO3 solution, brine and dried over anhy.Na2SO4. Filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 0.5 g (crude) of 2-bromo-1-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one, 22c as gummy solid. It was taken as such to the next step without purification.

#### Step 4: Synthesis of 4-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-amine (22d)

To a stirred solution of 2-bromo-1-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one, 22c (crude, 0.5 g) in EtOH (80 mL) at 25 °C, thiourea (0.13 g) was added and stirred for 1 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product. It was stirred with aq. Ammonia (25 wt% in water) at 25 °C for 30 min. The solid thus obtained was filtered, washed with water and dried to afford 0.11 g (crude) of 4-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-amine, 22d as yellow amorphous powder. It was taken as such to the next step without purification.

#### Step 5: Synthesis of N-(4-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (compound 22)

To a stirred solution of 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid (0.1 g) in dry dichloromethane (10 mL), was added triethylamine (0.7 mL) followed by HATU (0.3 g) at 0 °C and stirred for 30 min. Then 4-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-amine, 22d (0.11 g) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 3 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC & LCMS), the reaction mixture was diluted with dichloromethane (10 mL), washed with aqueous 10% NaHCO3 solution, brine and dried over anhy.Na2SO4. Filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product. It was stirred with methanol at 25 °C for 30 min, the solid thus obtained was filtered, washed with methanol and dried to yield 0.015 g of N-(4-(4-chloro-3-ethoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide, as yellow amorphous powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.37 (bs, 1H), 8.23-8.27 (m, 2H), 7.90 (s, 1H), 7.67-7.67 (m, 1H), 7.49-7.55 (m, 2H), 4.20 (q, J = 6.96 Hz, 2H), 1.41 (t, J = 6.96 Hz, 3H). LCMS: Calculated for C16H12ClN3O4S2 = 409.86, Observed = 409.8. HPLC = 96.797% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 5 micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile).

### Compound 23: N-(4-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 2147485-37-6)

#### Step 1: Synthesis of N,3-dimethoxy-N-methyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide (23a)

To a stirred solution of 3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoic acid (0.2 g, 0.91 mM, 1.0 equiv) in dichloromethane (6 mL) at 25 °C, N,O-Dimethylhydroxylamine Hydrochloride (0.13 g, 1.36 mM, 1.5 equiv), 1-Hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate (0.15 g, 1.08 mM, 1.2 equiv) and triethylamine (0.5 mL, 3.63 mM, 4.0 equiv) were added under N2 atmosphere. Then N-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI.HCl) (0.21 g, 1.08 mM, 1.2 equiv) was added at 0οC and stirred at 25 °C for 16 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was diluted with dichloromethane (100 mL), washed with aqueous 10% NaHCO3 solution, brine and dried over anhy.Na2SO4. Filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product. It was purified by silica gel (60–120 mesh) column chromatography using petroleum ether: ethyl acetate (80:20) to afford 0.23 g (96%) of N,3-dimethoxy-N-methyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide, 23a (Figure S15) as colorless liquid. The crude product was used as such for the next step without purification. GCMS: Calculated for C11H12F3NO3 = 263.22, Observed = 263.1.

#### Step 2: Synthesis of 1-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ethan-1-one (23b)

To a stirred solution of N,3-dimethoxy-N-methyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide, 23a (0.87 g, 3.3 mM, 1.0 equiv) in dry tetrahydrofuran (10 mL), methylmagnesium chloride solution (3 M in THF, 1.5 mL, 4.62 mmol, 1.4 equiv) was added dropwise at 0 °C and stirred for 1 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was quenched by the slow addition of 1.5 N HCl (10 mL) and extracted with MTBE. The combined organic layers were washed with water, brine and dried over anhy.Na2SO4. Filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield 0.71 g (crude) of 1-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ethan-1-one, 25b as pale yellow liquid. The crude product was taken as such to the next step without further purification. GCMS: Calculated for C10H9F3O2 = 218.18, Observed = 218.0.

#### Step 3: Synthesis of 2-bromo-1-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ethan-1-one (23c)

To a stirred solution of 1-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ethan-1-one, 23b (0.7 g, 3.2 mM, 1.0 equiv) in HBr in AcOH (30 wt% in AcOH, 7 mL) at 0 °C, Bromine (0.41 mL, 2.56 mM, 0.8 equiv) was added dropwise and stirred for 1 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was poured into crushed ice and extracted with MTBE. The combined organic extracts were washed with aqueous 10% NaHCO3 solution, brine and dried over anhy.Na2SO4. Filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 0.77 g (crude) of 2 2-bromo-1-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ethan-1-one, 25c as an off-white powder. The crude product was taken as such to the next step without purification. GCMS: Calculated for C10H8BrF3O2 = 297.07, Observed = 298.0.

#### Step 4: Synthesis of 4-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-amine (23d)

To a stirred solution of 2-bromo-1-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ethan-1-one, 23c (0.76 g, 2.55 mM, 1.0 equiv) in EtOH (15 mL) at 25 °C, thiourea (0.195 g, 2.55 mM, 1.0 equiv) was added and stirred for 1 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product. It was stirred with aq. Ammonia (25 wt% in water) at 25 °C for 30 min. The solid thus obtained was filtered, washed with water and dried to yield 0.5 g (crude) of 4-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-amine, 23d as yellowish amorphous powder. The product was taken as such to the next step without purification. LCMS: Calculated for C11H9F3N2OS = 274.26, Observed = 275.0.

#### Step 5: Synthesis of N-(4-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide

To a stirred solution of 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid (0.126 g, 0.727 mM, 1.0 equiv) in dry dichloromethane (6 mL), triethylamine (0.4 mL, 2.9 mM, and 4.0 equiv) was added, followed by HATU (0.33 g, 0.872 mM, 1.2 equiv) at 0 °C and stirred for 30 min. Then 4-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-amine, 23d (0.2 g, 0.727 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 16 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC & LCMS), diluted with dichloromethane (100 mL), washed with aqueous 10% NaHCO3 solution, brine and dried over anhy.Na2SO4. Filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product. It was purified by silica gel (60–120 mesh) column chromatography using petroleum ether: ethyl acetate (60:40) to afford 0.13 g (42%) of N-(4-(3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide, as an orange amorphous powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.44 (bs, 1H), 8.23-8.28 (m, 2H), 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.77 (s, 1H), 7.67-7.70 (m, 2H), 3.98 (s, 3H). LCMS: Calculated for C16H10F3N3O4S2 = 429.39, Observed = 430.0. HPLC = 98.158% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 5micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile).

### Compound 24: N-(4-(3, 5-difluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxamide (CAS: 2147485-29-6)

Compound 24 was synthesized using scheme and procedure analogous to compound 7 from commercially available 4-(3,5-difluoro-phenyl)-thiazol-2-ylamine (CAS: 676348-23-5, Fluorochem) and 5-Nitro-2-thiophencarboxylic acid.

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.39 (bs, 1H), 8.25-8.23 (m, 2H,), 8.01 (s, 1H), 7.67-7.65 (m, 1H), 7.23-7.21 (m, 1H). LCMS: Calculated for C14H7F2N3O3S2, = 367.34, Observed = 368.0, HPLC = 99.05% (HPLC Column: Phenomenex Gemini-NX C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) 5micron, Mobile Phase A: 10 mM Ammonium acetate in water, Mobile Phase B: Acetonitrile.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Nikaido, H. & Pagès, J.-M. Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36, 340–363 (2012).

2. 2.

Piddock, L. J. V. Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps - not just for resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 629–636 (2006).

3. 3.

Li, X. Z., Zhang, L., Srikumar, R. & Poole, K. Beta-lactamase inhibitors are substrates for the multidrug efflux pumps of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 399–403 (1998).

4. 4.

Nakae, T., Saito, K. & Nakajima, A. Effect of sulbactam on anti-pseudomonal activity of beta-lactam antibiotics in cells producing various levels of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump and beta-lactamase. Microbiol. Immunol. 44, 997–1001 (2000).

5. 5.

Lomovskaya, O. et al. Use of a genetic approach to evaluate the consequences of inhibition of efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43, 1340–1346 (1999).

6. 6.

Lomovskaya, O. et al. Identification and characterization of inhibitors of multidrug resistance efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: novel agents for combination therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 105–116 (2001).

7. 7.

Payne, D. J., Gwynn, M. N., Holmes, D. J. & Pompliano, D. L. Drugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6, 29–40 (2007).

8. 8.

Brown, D. G., May-Dracka, T. L., Gagnon, M. M. & Tommasi, R. Trends and exceptions of physical properties on antibacterial activity for Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. J. Med. Chem. 57, 10144–10161 (2014).

9. 9.

Hameed, P. S. et al. Pyrazolopyrimidines establish MurC as a vulnerable target in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. ACS Chem. Biol. 9, 2274–2282 (2014).

10. 10.

Brown, E. D. & Wright, G. D. Antibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era. Nature 529, 336–343 (2016).

11. 11.

Askoura, M., Mottawea, W., Abujamel, T. & Taher, I. Efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) as new antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Libyan J. Med. 6 (2011).

12. 12.

Murakami, S., Nakashima, R., Yamashita, E., Matsumoto, T. & Yamaguchi, A. Crystal structures of a multidrug transporter reveal a functionally rotating mechanism. Nature 443, 173–179 (2006).

13. 13.

Yu, E. W., Aires, J. R., McDermott, G. & Nikaido, H. A periplasmic drug-binding site of the AcrB multidrug efflux pump: a crystallographic and site-directed mutagenesis study. J. Bacteriol. 187, 6804–6815 (2005).

14. 14.

Seeger, M. A. et al. Structural asymmetry of AcrB trimer suggests a peristaltic pump mechanism. Science 313, 1295–1298 (2006).

15. 15.

Trott, O. & Olson, A. J. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455–461 (2010).

16. 16.

Schrodinger. ThePyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8 (2015).

17. 17.

Takatsuka, Y., Chen, C. & Nikaido, H. Mechanism of recognition of compounds of diverse structures by the multidrug efflux pump AcrB of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6559–6565 (2010).

18. 18.

Bohnert, J. A., Karamian, B. & Nikaido, H. Optimized Nile Red Efflux Assay of AcrAB-TolC Multidrug Efflux System Shows Competition between Substrates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 3770–3775 (2010).

19. 19.

Vargiu, A. V. & Nikaido, H. Multidrug binding properties of the AcrB efflux pump characterized by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20637–20642 (2012).

20. 20.

Blair, J. M. A. et al. AcrB drug-binding pocket substitution confers clinically relevant resistance and altered substrate specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3511–3516 (2015).

21. 21.

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 7. 1, http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/ (2017).

22. 22.

Baba, T. et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 2006.0008 (2006).

23. 23.

Liu, A. et al. Antibiotic Sensitivity Profiles Determined with an Escherichia coli Gene Knockout Collection: Generating an Antibiotic Bar Code. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 1393–1403 (2010).

24. 24.

Linwu, S.-W., Syu, C.-J., Chen, Y.-L., Wang, A. H.-J. & Peng, F.-C. Characterization of Escherichia coli nitroreductase NfsB in the metabolism of nitrobenzodiazepines. Biochem. Pharmacol. 78, 96–103 (2009).

25. 25.

Sandegren, L., Lindqvist, A., Kahlmeter, G. & Andersson, D. I. Nitrofurantoin resistance mechanism and fitness cost in Escherichia coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 62, 495–503 (2008).

26. 26.

Whiteway, J. et al. Oxygen-insensitive nitroreductases: analysis of the roles of nfsA and nfsB in development of resistance to 5-nitrofuran derivatives in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 180, 5529–5539 (1998).

27. 27.

Nishino, K., Latifi, T. & Groisman, E. A. Virulence and drug resistance roles of multidrug efflux systems of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 59, 126–141 (2006).

28. 28.

Kobayashi, K., Tsukagoshi, N. & Aono, R. Suppression of hypersensitivity of Escherichia coli acrB mutant to organic solvents by integrational activation of the acrEF operon with the IS1 or IS2 element. J. Bacteriol. 183, 2646–2653 (2001).

29. 29.

Blair, J. M. A. et al. Expression of homologous RND efflux pump genes is dependent upon AcrB expression: implications for efflux and virulence inhibitor design. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 70, 424–431 (2015).

30. 30.

Race, P. R. et al. Structural and mechanistic studies of Escherichia coli nitroreductase with the antibiotic nitrofurazone. Reversed binding orientations in different redox states of the enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 13256–13264 (2005).

31. 31.

Du, D. et al. Structure of the AcrAB-TolC multidrug efflux pump. Nature 509, 512–515 (2014).

32. 32.

Alexandrov, A. I., Mileni, M., Chien, E. Y. T., Hanson, M. A. & Stevens, R. C. Microscale Fluorescent Thermal Stability Assay for Membrane Proteins. Structure 16, 351–359 (2008).

33. 33.

Studier, F. W. Use of bacteriophage T7 lysozyme to improve an inducible T7 expression system. J. Mol. Biol. 219, 37–44 (1991).

34. 34.

Yu, L., Lu, W. & Wei, Y. AcrB trimer stability and efflux activity, insight from mutagenesis studies. Plos One 6, e28390 (2011).

35. 35.

Morris, G. M. et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2785–2791 (2009).

36. 36.

Wang, L.-J. et al. Highly efficient synthesis of chiral alcohols with a novel NADH-dependent reductase from Streptomyces coelicolor. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 7023–7028 (2011).

37. 37.

Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157–1174 (2004).

38. 38.

Jakalian, A., Jack, D. B. & Bayly, C. I. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. J. Comput. Chem. 23, 1623–1641 (2002).

39. 39.

Hornak, V. et al. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 65, 712–725 (2006).

40. 40.

Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N · log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).

41. 41.

Lambrakos, S., Boris, J., Oran, E., Chandrasekhar, I. & Nagumo, M. A modified shake algorithm for maintaining rigid bonds in molecular dynamics simulations of large molecules. J. Comput. Phys. 85, 473–486 (1989).

42. 42.

Maestro-Desmond Interoperability Tools, version 4.2. (Schrödinger 2015).

## Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC) under grant agreement no. BT/BIPP/0803/30/14 (to V.B.). Authors thank to Syngene International, Bengaluru for discovery chemistry support, and TheraIndx Lifesciences, Bengaluru for timely delivery of animal studies. Authors acknowledge support of St. John’s Medical Hospital, Bengaluru for collection and maintaining the clinical strains which further utilized in current study. Authors also thank Centre for Cellular and Molecular Platforms (C-CAMP) for Bio-Incubation facility support.

## Author information

### Affiliations

1. #### BUGWORKS Research India Pvt. Ltd., Centre for Cellular & Molecular Platforms, National Centre for Biological Sciences, GKVK, Bellary Rd, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560065, India

• Shahul Hameed P
• , Nainesh Katagihallimath
• , Sreevalli Sharma
• , Anirudh P. Shanbhag
• , Riya Narjari
• , Maitrayee Sarma
• , Purnendu Bhowmik
• , Prakruthi Amar
• , Rajani Ravishankar
• , Vasanthi Ramachandran
• , V. Balasubramanian
•  & Santanu Datta
2. #### Centre for Cellular and Molecular Platforms (C-CAMP), National Centre for Biological Sciences, GKVK, Bellary Rd, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560065, India

• Nagakumar Bharatham
3. #### St. John’s Research Institute, 100 Feet Rd, John Nagar, Koramangala, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560034, India

• Teby Thomas
4. #### TheraIndx Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Sy No. 27, Deganahalli, Budihal Post, Nelamangala, Karnataka, 562123, India

• Ramesh Jayaraman
5. #### Syngene International Ltd., Plot 2 & 3, Bommasandra Industrial Estate - Phase-IV, Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560099, India

• Kubendran Muthan
•  & Ramesh Subbiah

### Contributions

V.B., S.D. and S.H.P. designed the project. S.S., P.A., N.K., designed and performed the MIC, MBC as well as target identification and validation experiments. R.N., N.K., S.D. designed and performed enzyme kinetic experiments. A.P.S. and N.K., performed and analyzed outcome of efflux and thermal shift assays. MIC90 experiments and MIC evaluation on clinical strains were designed and performed by T.T., M.S., R.R. and V.R. N.B. designed and performed all the computational docking and MD simulation studies. R.N., P.B., N.K., S.D. designed and performed nitroreductase knockout experiments. R.J., designed and performed animal experiments. S.H.P. was also involved in SAR analyses and optimization of compounds. R.S and K.M performed the chemical synthesis. S.H.P, N.B., N.K., R.N., A.P.S., V.R., V.B. and S.D. wrote the manuscript. All authors revised and contributed to the manuscript.

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santanu Datta.