Article | Open | Published:

An epistatic effect of KRT25 on SP6 is involved in curly coat in horses

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 6374 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Curly coat represents an extraordinary type of coat in horses, particularly seen in American Bashkir Curly Horses and Missouri Foxtrotters. In some horses with curly coat, a hypotrichosis of variable extent was observed, making the phenotype appear more complex. In our study, we aimed at investigating the genetic background of curly coat with and without hypotrichosis using high density bead chip genotype and next generation sequencing data. Genome-wide association analysis detected significant signals (p = 1.412 × 10−05–1.102 × 10−08) on horse chromosome 11 at 22–35 Mb. In this significantly associated region, six missense variants were filtered out from whole-genome sequencing data of three curly coated horses of which two variants within KRT25 and SP6 could explain all hair phenotypes. Horses heterozygous or homozygous only for KRT25 variant showed curly coat and hypotrichosis, whereas horses with SP6 variant only, exhibited curly coat without hypotrichosis. Horses with mutant alleles in both variants developed curly hair and hypotrichosis. Thus, mutant KRT25 allele is masking SP6 allele effect, indicative for epistasis of KRT25 variant over SP6 variant. In summary, genetic variants in two different genes, KRT25 and SP6, are responsible for curly hair. All horses with KRT25 variant are additionally hypotrichotic due to the KRT25 epistatic effect on SP6.

Introduction

Horse coats and their specific types and colors represent one of the most important characteristics of different breeds and populations after thousands of years of selective breeding in the course of domestication1,2. Thus, the composition and thickness of hair does not only play an essential role in the protection from heat or other physical or chemical influences but is also a distinctive feature to define modern horse breeds3. In particular, curly coat represents an outstanding feature that does not only occur in various types of horse breeds but is also unique due to its hypoallergenic potential resulting in milder or even no allergic symptoms in several horse allergic patients4,5,6. Curly coated horses have been found to develop a varying degree of curliness based on seasonal influences and in some cases to shed mane and tail in the summer or even develop a persistent hypotrichosis7. Histologic investigations of hypotrichotic curly horses revealed that this phenotype represents a form of follicular dysplasia7.

The mode of inheritance for curly coat is controversially discussed. Segregation ratios in matings of curly with straight coated Percheron as well as among curly coated Lokai horses suggested an autosomal recessive inheritance5,6. Analyses of breeding records of the American Bashkir Curly registry indicated an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance for curly coat as curly coated stallions sired curly and straight coated foals with curly coated mares8,9. These findings led to the suggestion that there might be two genetic types involved in the development of curly coat whose occurrence is dependent on breed or regional distributions of horses10.

The genetic cause for dominant curly coat was suggested to be a mutation derived from feral horses of North America10. Cross breedings with Quarter Horses (QH), Appaloosa and Paint Horses strongly influenced the development of a horse breed specifically selected for this curly coat trait, the so called American Bashkir Curly Horse (ABCH)10.

Nevertheless, curly coat has not only been found in horses but also in other species like cats11,12, cattle13, dogs14, rats15, mice16, rabbit17, pigs18 and humans19. In cats, several Rex breeds developed curly coat hair and vibrissae as a breed defining trait11,12,20. In Devon and Cornish Rex, the mode of inheritance was suggested to be autosomal recessive whereas an autosomal dominant locus was demonstrated for the tightly curled coat in Selkirk Rex cats11,12,20. Similar rexoid hair types were found in rat and mouse mutants in which a dominantly inherited mutation was proposed to result in curly hair and even in hair loss in homozygous rat mutants15,21. The rexoid phenotype in mice was shown to be indistinguishable from the Caracul curly coat type22, which could also be observed in Swedish cattle23. Other curly coats were found in Fleckvieh and Montbeliarde cattle and were also suggested to be dominantly inherited13. In humans, various curly hair types have been described either as specific morphologic types in populations or related with disorders24,25,26. There is evidence for a woolly hair type in men characterized by coarse, lusterless and tightly curled hair inherited as an autosomal dominant or recessive trait25,26. Affected patients showed different degrees of hypotrichosis similar to some curly coated horses. A so-called “scanty tail” was described in curly horses with remaining hair fibers at the root whereas a “string tail” with only few hair fibers at the tip of the tail was found in more severely affected horses7,25.

And even though curls in the coat of horses are popular when they occur not only in ABCHs but also in other horse breeds5,6, the genetic cause for curls in horses and for hypotrichosis in some individuals has not been discovered so far. In this study, we performed genotyping on a high density bead chip and next generation sequencing to identify causative variants for the development of curly coat and in addition, to disentangle the genetic mechanism for hypotrichosis in curly coated horses.

Results

Genome- and chromosome-wide association analysis

In our study, we phenotyped 216 horses and classified them into horses with curly coat accompanied with complete hypotrichosis, horses with curly coat accompanied with incomplete hypotrichosis, horses with curly coat but without hypotrichosis and straight coated horses without hypotrichosis. All horses with curly coat exhibited a curly tail and mane hair, too. The shape and tightness of curls in the coat was analogous to the shape and tightness of curls in mane and tail. The individual hair fibers had a more rough appearance in curly coated and hypotrichotic horses when compared with just curly coated horses. From these samples we chose 28 curly and 20 straight coated horses including ABCHs and Missouri Foxtrotters for genotyping on the Axiom Equine Genotyping Array 670 K (Affymetrix; Supplementary Table S1). Genome-wide association analysis for curly coat showed a highly significant peak on equine chromosome (ECA) 11 at 21,899,031 to 35,414,844 bp (Fig. 1a). In this peak region, 26 SNPs reached the significance threshold after correction for multiple testing using a Bonferroni correction. The highest association was found at 21,899,031 bp (p = 1.102 × 10−8) for AX-104299273 (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Genome-wide association analysis for curly versus straight coat. (a) Manhattan plot of −log10 p-values shows the highest and significant peak region on equine chromosome (ECA) 11. (b) Depiction of −log10 P-values in the region of the highest association at 21.9–35.4 Mb including the peak at 21,899,031 bp (P = 7.958). (c) Magnification of the region spanning the SNP with the highest p-value at 21,899,031 bp. From a total number of 202 genes found in the whole region of association, KRT25 could be identified closest to the most significant SNP.

Genotyping of the seven highest associated SNPs (Supplementary Table S2) in additional 139 horses and subsequent imputation onto all Axiom genotypes on ECA11 in these horses (Supplementary Tables S3S4) confirmed the associated region of 13.52 Mb in size. This genomic region harbored 202 genes including the two keratin (KRT) genes KRT24 and KRT25 and further 15 keratin genes located proximal of this region of association (Fig. 1c).

A genome-wide association analysis using horses with hypotrichosis as cases and horses without hypotrichosis as controls also revealed a genome-wide significant peak on ECA11 in the same region at 21,579,177–24,075,050 bp with the most significant SNP at 22,122,892 bp (p = 3.96 × 10−6, Supplementary Table S5).

Whole-genome sequencing

Whole-genome sequence data of one curly coated ABCH with complete hypotrichosis, one curly coated ABCH with incomplete hypotrichosis and one Missouri Foxtrotter without hypotrichosis as well as 27 straight coated controls revealed six variants located in associated region and the proximal keratin cluster (21,162,881–35,414,844 bp) with high or moderate effects exclusively found in one, two or all three curly coated horses (Supplementary Table S6). Pedigree analyses revealed curly coat-associated haplotypes in investigated families (Supplementary Figs S1S2).

Validation of all six variants in 148 curly and 68 straight coated horses revealed three genetic variants located within KRT25 (NC_009154.2:g.21891160G>A, ss2137510528), transcription factor Sp6 (SP6; NC_009154.2:g.24022045C>T, ss3021042887) and keratin associated protein 16 (KRTAP16, NC_009154.2:g.21414219G>A, ss2137510527) segregating with the curly phenotype (Supplementary Table S7). After genotyping of these three variants in a larger validation sample of 17 different equine populations, we found the KRTAP16 variant segregating in straight coated horses and therefore excluded this variant as causative for curly coat. The joint genotypic distribution of KRT25 and SP6 variants explained all curly phenotypes (Table 1). Horses with curls were heterozygous or homozygous in mutant alleles either in KRT25 or in SP6 variant or in both variants indicating a complete dominant allele effect for both curly mutations (Fig. 2). In addition, individuals with mutant KRT25 variant exhibited a variable degree of hypotrichosis (Supplementary Figs S3S8). Horses with a homozygous mutant genotype for KRT25 variant showed not only few and sparse curly hair of rough appearance but also an extreme shedding (hypotrichosis) whereas horses with a heterozygous mutant KRT25 genotype revealed an incomplete hypotrichosis and curly hair of rough appearance regardless of the SP6 mutant genotype. In contrast, horses exclusively heterozygous or homozygous in SP6 variant showed curly coat without hypotrichosis and were phenotypically indistinguishable. Most of these horses were derived from Missouri Foxtrotter breed or revealed Missouri Foxtrotter ancestors. Thus, KRT25 variant was epistatic to SP6 variant masking the effect of this variant by promoting rough hair and hypotrichosis.

Table 1 Genotypic distribution of KRT25, SP6 and KRTAP16 missense variants in all investigated equine populations.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Joint distribution of the genotypes of KRT25 and SP6 variants demonstrating the epistatic effect of KRT25. The KRT25 variant NC_009154.2:g.21891160G>A is phenotypically fully expressed despite the presence of SP6 variant NC_009154.2:g.24022045C>T. A curly coated horse with complete hypotrichosis is shown to harbor a homozygous mutant KRT25 genotype (a). Curly horses with incomplete hypotrichosis show a mutant allele only in KRT25 variant or both in KRT25 and SP6 variant (b). Curly horses with no hypotrichosis have either a heterozygous or homozygous mutant genotype for SP6 variant (c). Straight coated horses have a homozygous wild type genotype in both loci (d). Grey coloring and crosses mark the genotypic distribution identified in this study and its correlation with the phenotypes.

Both the substitution of arginine to histidine in KRT25 protein and the substitution of glycine to serine in SP6 protein were predicted to be possibly damaging (KRT25: 1.00, Sp6: 0.84) by PolyPhen-227 as well as deleterious (KRT25: 0.01) and tolerated/neutral (SP6: 0.15/0.83) by SIFT28. In addition, SP6 variant was predicted to be located in a low complexity region (position 361–373, Ensembl release 91).

This was reassured using comparative species alignments with Clustal Omega29 showing KRT25 variant to be located in a highly conserved region which is located within the predicted intermediate filament protein domain (Fig. 3a,b). Alignments of SP6 revealed the SP6 variant in a conserved section of the protein distal of the Zn-finger domain friend of GATA (FOG) family (Fig. 3c,d).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Protein sequence alignment and domains. (a) Alignment of KRT25 protein sequence using Clustal Omega. Positions with a fully conserved residue (asterisks) or a conservation of strongly similar (colons) as well as weakly similar properties (periods) between groups are displayed. The missense variant R89H occurs in a highly conserved region. (b) Predicted protein domain of KRT25. The variant R89H is located in the intermediate filament protein domain. (c) Alignment of SP6 protein sequence using Clustal Omega. The missense variant G364S is also located in a conserved region. (d) Predicted protein domain of SP6. The variant G364S is can be found distal of the FOG:Zn-finger domain.

RNA-Seq and expression analysis

To further address functional aspects regarding curly coat development and hypotrichosis, RNA sequencing was performed in parallel to whole-genome sequencing analysis in nine curly coated ABCHs, three straight coated ABCHs and three straight coated QHs (Supplementary Table S8). It resulted in an average number of 77 million mapped reads per sample, an average number of five billion bases and an average quality (Phred quality score) of 34. Differential gene expression analysis for curly versus straight hair revealed a high number of upregulated genes implied by negative log fold changes (logFC) in curly ABCHs and downregulated genes implied by positive logFC in curly ABCHs (Supplementary Table S9). Filtering for significant FDR adjusted p-values (padj < 0.05) showed in 156 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). In total, 42 of these significant DEGs were located on ECA11 and were all upregulated in curly coated horses.

Further investigation of the two genes KRT25 and SP6 revealed no differential expression of their transcripts. Nevertheless, we identified six keratin genes and further 14 hair development related genes with significant p-values in close proximity of KRT25 and SP6. To explore the potential interaction of these genes due to their co-localization, validation of their expression levels was performed in additional 38 horses (Supplementary Table S10). A generalized linear model (GLM) analysis used to find out whether there was a relation of KRT25 or SP6 genotypes with the expression levels of the investigated 20 genes revealed significant p-values for keratin 17 (KRT17, p(FDR) = 0.04) and SRY-box 9 (SOX9, p(FDR) = 0.0005). Gene network analysis predicted a co-expression of SOX9 with KRT25 and KRT17 and further co-expression of SOX9, KRT25, KRT17 and SP6 with various further keratin genes (Supplementary Fig. S9).

In addition to the analysis of genes in close proximity of the candidate variants on ECA11, we investigated the total set of 156 DEGs for potential interactors with KRT25 or SP6 (Supplementary Table S11). Only one of the 20 predicted KRT25-interactors, the keratin gene KRT1, was found to be significantly differentially expressed in curly versus straight horses. Further group comparison of horses with mutant KRT25 versus KRT25 wild genotypes revealed an even higher significance for the differential expression of KRT1 and in addition a significant p-value for KRT79. Comparisons of horses with mutant SP6 versus SP6 wild genotypes revealed none of the 10 SP6-interactors or 20 KRT25-interactors to be significantly differentially expressed.

Morphologic analysis

High-resolution scanning of hair surfaces of coat, mane and tail hair from horses of all six different detected KRT25 and SP6 genotype combinations showed that horses only mutated for KRT25 could be clearly distinguished from horse only mutated for SP6. However, horses heterozygous for both variants were indistinguishable from horses only mutated for KRT25 (Fig. 4). The hair surface of KRT25 mutants as well as KRT25 and SP6 mutants was rough, irregularly desquamated and scaly. Homozygous KRT25 mutant horses (A/A) particularly developed an extremely irregular desquamation as well as scales partially detached from the shaft. Some scales were raised in these hair samples resulting in thickened areas due to a stacking of scales. In contrast, hair fibers of curly coated horses mutant for SP6 variant (C/T or T/T) but wild type in KRT25 revealed a regular desquamation with only slightly raised scales. In straight coated horses and straight coated QHs the desquamation was regular as well, and the surface of hair fibers was continuously smooth.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Morphologic characterization of curly genotypes. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging of tail (500x), mane (1000x) and coat hair (1000x) (descending per column). Curly hair fibers from horses homozygous mutant for KRT25 variant display an extremely irregular desquamation with detached and stacked scales (a). Hair samples from horses with a heterozygous KRT25 genotype (b) or a heterozygous KRT25 and SP6 genotype (c) also show an irregular desquamation but a less pronounced detachment of scales. In contrast, hair fibers of horses with two mutant SP6 alleles (d) or one mutant SP6 allele (e) appear to have a regular desquamation and only slightly raised scales. A sharply defined and regular desquamation is shown in straight hair of ABCHs (f) as well as of QHs (g).

The outer appearance of curly hair investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed depressions and rotations in horses mutant for KRT25, SP6 or both. In contrast, straight hair had a fully cylindrical shape without depressions or rotations (Supplementary Fig. S10).

Cross sections of middle parts of guard hair fibers showed a significantly different appearance in curly hair in comparison to straight hair. Curly hair samples of horses mutant for KRT25, SP6 or both genes showed a heterogeneous but not circular shaped shaft and a restricted medulla region (Supplementary Fig. S11). No apparent differences were identified in-between horses with homozygous mutant KRT25 or SP6 (A/A or T/T) genotypes and horses with heterozygous genotypes. In contrast, sections of hair shafts from straight hair had the shape of a symmetric circle and revealed a centered medulla region both in straight ABCHs and QHs. Longitudinal sections supported these findings. Mid regions of curly hair shafts showed only medullar remnants. The depicted structures mostly complied with pure cortex tissue. In straight hair, the medulla was clearly defined showing a clean and sharp transition to the cortex.

Discussion

Our study clearly demonstrated the independent effects of KRT25 and SP6 on curly coat development in horses. Hair fibers from both mutant SP6 or mutant KRT25 horses showed typical curly hair characteristics like a polymorphic shape, restricted medulla and rotated shafts with depressions. These findings, which were also identified in human, rat, mice and cattle curl types, were postulated to be essential properties of curly hair15,23,30,31,32. They confirmed a complete dominance for curliness of hair fibers for both variants. In addition, an incomplete or complete hypotrichosis was clinically obvious in horses with mutant KRT25 as well as in horses with mutant KRT25 and mutant SP6. In these horses, the rough texture of the coat appeared due to an irregular desquamation and frayed scales especially pronounced in horses with complete hypotrichosis probably supporting broken hair fibers and hair loss along with dysplastic hair follicles identified in skin biopsies7. We conclude that KRT25 variant has pleiotropic effects on hair fibers leading to curly hair, a modified hair fiber structure and hypotrichosis. For this reason, we propose that mutant KRT25 is epistatic to mutant SP6, meaning the effect of SP6 is overlaid due to the pleiotropy of KRT25 variant on the structure of hair fibers.

Previous reports on curly horse pedigrees already suggested more than one genetic mechanism as the cause for curly hair9. An evaluation independent from this study identified the KRT25 variant in French and North American horses associated with curly hair33. In this work, which has been published during the review process of this manuscript, KRT25-associated phenotypes were assessed by their outer appearance and assumed to be curly coated only. However, the results of our study show that hypotrichosis and rough hair surface are actually important properties that do not only differentiate the horses from curly hair types not carrying KRT25 variant but are also essential for the distinction of heterozygous or homozygous mutant genotypes.

Furthermore, it was postulated that there might be a second dominant locus for curly hair in particular in curly horses crossed with Missouri Foxtrotters potentially located in an incorrectly annotated region of the horse reference genome33. However, our analysis revealed that SP6 was located in an annotated region but was more difficult to detect due to the breeders unintentional mixing of horses harboring KRT25 variant with horses harboring SP6 variant. Due to the identification of SP6 variant, we could explain phenotypes of so far discordant horses33 without a mutant KRT25 allele. In addition, we observed a particularly high frequency of SP6 variant in Missouri Foxtrotters and a mixture of both variants in intermixes of Missouri Foxtrotters and ABCHs whereas KRT25 variant was more frequent in ABCHs. In all samples used for this study, the number of horses harboring SP6 variant in comparison to those harboring KRT25 variant was low. We assume that targeted selection for purebred ABCHs might have led to a wider distribution of KRT25 variant among curly coated horses. This also supports the results from genome-wide association analysis showing the highest peak of association close to KRT25 probably due to the larger number of individuals genotyped on the bead chip harboring mutant KRT25, in comparison to those harboring mutant SP6 or both mutant alleles. Further genome-wide association analysis for horses with hypotrichosis compared to horses without hypotrichosis confirmed the region harboring KRT25, presumably as the development of hypotrichosis and KRT25 alleles are in complete concordance.

Both identified missense variants in KRT25 and SP6 were predicted to provide a modified protein but did not affect gene expression of KRT25 or of SP6. Nevertheless, a significant increase of KRT17 expression was observed in curly horses. We propose that this expression might probably be modified due to the increased need of regenerative processes in particular in horses with hair fibers with a worn surface and detached scales. KRT17 is known to be notably expressed in regenerated hair follicles and is important for hair follicle neogenesis34. We assume that the reduced rigidity of hair fibers we identified in morphologic analyses might probably have triggered secondary self-repairing processes performed by KRT17 and maybe also by KRT1, KRT79 and SOX9, due to their involvement in epidermal and hair regeneration processes35,36,37.

Thus, we assume that the development of curly hair is not a result of differential expression but of protein modifying effects as is was postulated in various other curly coated animals13,14,38. We identified a high conservation in the regions of mutant KRT25 and SP6 alleles suggesting a probably damaging effect on SP6 and KRT25 protein. Effect prediction tools confirmed this assumption even though SP6 was proposed to be possibly damaging or tolerated by different databases. Nevertheless, we identified this variant in a low-complexity region, which was shown to be typically difficult to analyze by conventional sequence analysis procedures39. It was postulated that low-complexity regions have a larger number of binding partners in protein interaction networks, which is presumably essential for the transcription factor SP639.

SP6 was shown to play an important role as a highly cell- and tissue-specific transcription factor primary expressed in hair follicles, teeth and limbs40. Mice lacking SP6 developed short and curly whiskers whereas the dorsal skin revealed only short hair tips but no development of a dense fur41. Thus, it was proposed that SP6 plays an essential role in the proliferation of cells in the skin40. We assume that mutant SP6 in curly coated horses might provoke an asymmetry in the proliferative compartment of hair follicles and thereby result in a curved shape of the hair as it was observed in human curly hair19,30.

Furthermore, we suppose that mutant KRT25 might develop curly hair due to a combined effect on hair proliferation in the hair bulb as it was found in human curly hair30 and a disorganization of the macrofibril structure. KRT25 was shown to be a member of the type I hair keratins42. These keratins were found to be important for the formation of keratin intermediate filaments (microfibrils) as components of macrofibrils essential for the assembly and maintenance of hair structure42. A protein modifying variant in human KRT25 was suggested to cause a disarrangement of the macrofibril structure43. Due to its expression in the inner root sheath of the hair follicle and the hair shaft medulla44, an altered KRT25 protein in horses is likely to affect all over the formation of macrofibril types resulting in a larger number of orthocortical cells with a typical twisted appearance similar to curly hair fibers in human, instead of homogenous mesocortical cells in straight hair30,45,46.

In addition, as it was shown in tightly curled and sparse human woolly hair, the curly phenotype can be related to the development of hypotrichosis and a modified structure of the hair fibers43. The hair properties we identified in morphologic analysis can be assumed to be the reason for the coarse and lusterless appearance in these horses just as it was found in human woolly hair caused by a missense variant in KRT2525,43. Similar observations were made in KRT25 mouse mutants with ragged and fragile vibrissae32 as well as curly coated rexoid mutant rats with an irregularly arranged outer appearance of the hair cuticles all over the body15.

In conclusion, we identified two missense variants in KRT25 and SP6 acting independently on the development of a curly coat. Moreover, we demonstrated an epistatic effect of KRT25 variant on SP6 variant due to its pleiotropy on hair structure and hair loss.

Methods

Sample Collection and Phenotyping

The study included pedigree data, EDTA-blood and hair samples from 216 horses. All animal work has been operated in compliance with the national and international guidelines for animal welfare. EDTA-blood and hair sampling received the permission of the Lower Saxony state veterinary office Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Oldenburg, Germany (registration number 33.19-42502-05-15A581).

All horses were phenotyped by careful examination of coat, mane, tail, fetlock hair, ear hair and eyelashes. For a reliable identification of phenotypes, all examinations were performed in the winter season when the curly coat was fully expressed. Findings were documented in a questionnaire including the body coat type classified as straight, wavy, medium curl or tight curl. All three types wavy, medium and tight curl were classified as curly coat. Mane and tail were categorized as curly or straight. Furthermore, it was documented whether the horses showed an incomplete or complete hypotrichosis. Hypotrichosis, by definition a loss or reduction of hair, was assigned as complete if the horse showed a total loss of tail and mane hair at the day of examination or at a later time point documented by photos. Horses with incomplete hypotrichosis did not loose all mane and tail hair but showed shedding and broken hair especially at the lateral upper tail and the shock of hair on the head. 148 curly coated individuals composed of 133 American Bashkir Curly Horses, five Miniature ABCHs, one Kentucky Mountain Saddle Horse, five Foxtrotters, one Oldenburger, one Danish Warmblood horses, one Holsteiner and one ABCH QH crossbreed. Samples of 68 straight coated horses comprised 24 ABCHs, 39 QH, three Missouri Foxtrotters, one Oldenburger and one ABCH Paint horse crossbreed. Hair samples were taken from the horses’ tail and stored in RNALater reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) immediately after sampling.


Genome- and chromosome-wide association study

For genotyping we isolated genomic DNA from 48 EDTA blood samples with a standard ethanol fraction47 and adjusted it to 50 ng/µl. The samples composed of 28 curly coated horses comprising 8 horses with complete hypotrichosis, 15 horses with incomplete hypotrichosis and 5 horses with no hypotrichosis as well as 20 straight coated horses without hypotrichosis were genotyped on the Axiom Equine Genotyping Array 670 K (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, United States) for 670,796 SNPs using standard procedures as recommended by the manufacturer. A minor allele frequency (MAF) of >0.05 and a genotyping rate of 98% served as quality criteria. Genome-wide association analysis was done for curly coated horses as cases versus straight coated horses as controls. In addition, we performed a GWA analysis for horses with hypotrichosis as cases and horses without signs of hypotrichosis as controls.

A max (T) permutation test (mperm 10,000) was done using PLINK, V 1.07 (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink/). The eigenstrat method was used to test for model robustness using two principal components as covariates (lambda = 1.15587). All −log10 p-values were Bonferroni-corrected using the MULTIPLE TEST procedure of SAS V 9.4 (Statistical Analysis System, Cary, NC, 2017).

Seven SNPs in the peak region of association on ECA11 were further validated in 187 horses, composed of 48 horses already genotyped on the 670 K Axiom Equine Genotyping Array (Affymetrix) and additional 139 horses using competitive allele specific PCR (KASP) genotyping assays (LGC Genomics, Teddington, Middlesex, UK; Supplementary Table S12). These 139 horses could be divided into 88 curly coated ABCHs, one curly coated Miniature ABCH, two curly coated Missouri Foxtrotter, one curly coated Oldenburger, one curly coated Kentucky Saddle Mountain Horse, one curly coated Danish Warmblood, 17 straight coated ABCHs, 25 straight coated QHs, one straight coated Missouri Foxtrotter, one straight coated Oldenburger and one straight coated ABCH Paint Horse crossbreed. KASP genotyping reactions were performed using 5 μl KASP Master Mix 2x (LGC Genomics), 0.14 μl KASP Assay mix (two allele-specific primers, one common primer designed by LGC) and 5 μl template DNA with a concentration of 7–17 ng/µl. After the KASP standard thermal cycling touchdown protocol was run on a thermocycler TProfessional 96 (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) using an annealing temperature of 61 °C and −0.5 °C decrease in each cycle, allelic discrimination was done on ABI7300 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA).

In the attempt to narrow down the region of genome-wide association, we used the genotypes of the seven variants validated in 139 additional horses to get more in-depth information of markers in and around this location. We imputed the genotyping results of these seven SNPs onto all Axiom genotypes on ECA11 in 187 individuals for 12,681 SNPs using BEAGLE (V 4.1)48.

A chromosome-wide association analysis was run again on basis of these imputed data using PLINK, (V 1.07 (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink/).


Whole Genome Sequencing

Whole genome sequencing was performed on Illumina NextSeq 500 (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) in three curly coated horses including one curly coated ABCH with complete hypotrichosis, one curly coated ABCH with incomplete hypotrichosis and one Missouri Foxtrotter without hypotrichosis. Libraries were prepared from high quality DNA with NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) using focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) for fragmentation and magnetic beats (AMPure beats, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for size selection. Sequencing was performed in pair-end mode for 300 cycles. Whole-genome sequencing data were submitted to sequence read archive (SRA, NCBI, SubmissionID: SUB2718263, BioProject ID: PRJNA387659). Reads were trimmed with a quality score threshold of 20 (5′ and 3′-end) and a maximum allowed score of 90 using PRINSEQ (V 0.20.4)49.

Mapping and variant calling was done for all three curly coated ABCHs and further 27 straight coated controls derived from SRA including six Przewalski horses (SRX305128, SRX305127, SRX302128, SRX302111, SRX302110, SRS441443), three Shetland ponies (ERX947605, ERX947604, SRX1976860), two Connemara Ponies (SRX850675, SRX850674), one Marwari (SRX535352), one Icelandic horse (SRS439179), one Standardbred (SRS438330), one Norwegian Fjord (SRS438157), one Donkey (SRS431817), one Thoroughbred (SRX396629), one Saxon-Thuringian Heavy Warmblood (SRX1131818), four Hanoverian (SRX1131785, SRX1131705, SRX389477, SRX389480), two Sorraia (SRX1131820, SRX389475), two Arabian (SRS431663, SRX389472) and one Duelmen Horse (SRX384479)) using BWA 0.7.1350 and SAMtools 1.3.151, Picard tools 2.3.0 (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) and GATK 3.5 (https://software.broadinstitute.org/gatk/)52. A minimum read depth of 2 and quality values 20 were applied for further investigated data. Variants were filtered for SNPs or Indels in the candidate region on ECA11, comprising the keratin cluster proximal of the region of association and the highest significant peak of association (21,162,881-35,414,844 bp) using SAS, V 9.4 (Statistical Analysis System, Cary, NC). We specifically selected those variants with a minimum of one mutant allele found in one, two or all three ABCHs and only wild type genotype in the reference horses (Supplementary Table S13). In a second step, those variants with high or moderate effects according to SNPEff predictions (SNPEff V 4.1 g)53 were further investigated for their potential influence on protein function using SIFT28 and PolyPhen-227.


Validation of candidate SNPs

Validation of six missense mutations derived from whole-genome sequencing analysis was done using KASP for the NC_009154.2:g.21891160G>A (KRT25) variant and restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) for the remaining five variants in 148 curly coated and 68 straight coated horses (Supplementary Table S14). Graphic representation of haplotypes was constructed using Merlin54 and Haplopainter55. For the SP6 variant a mismatch primer was used according to56. The three variants, whose genotypes segregated with the phenotypes, NC_009154.2:g.21891160G>A (KRT25), NC_009154.2:g.24022045C>T (SP6) and NC_009154.2:g.21414219G>A (KRTAP16) were further genotyped in 420 equids of 17 populations including Duelmen horse, Black Forest Coldblood, Rhenish German Coldblood, Norwegian, Lewitzer, Friesian, Miniature Donkeys, Sorraia, Trotter, Przewalski, Arabian Thoroughbred, Anglo-Arabian, Austrian Coldblood, Hanoverian, Holsteiner, Trakehner-Barb and Swedish Warmblood (Table 1). All three SNPs were submitted to dbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/) referred to as ss3021042887 (NC_009154.2:g.24022045C>T), ss2137510528 (NC_009154.2:g.21891160G>A) and ss 2137510527 (NC_009154.2:g.21414219G>A). In addition, multiple sequence alignment was performed to investigate sequence conservation in the region of the two candidate variants using Clustal Omega29 Protein domains were predicted using NCBI conserved domain search57.


RNA Sequencing and Expression Analysis

For RNA sequencing samples of nine curly coated ABCHs, three straight coated ABCHs and three straight coated QHs were selected. Three of the curly coated horses and three of the straight coated horses have already been genotyped on the bead chip for genome-wide association analysis. Total RNA was isolated from coat, mane and tail hair stored in RNALater reagent (Qiagen). For extraction, we used QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen). Samples were homogenized using Precellys Lysing Kit (VWR International, Darmstadt, Germany) and further processed using RNeasy Lipid Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and RNase-Free DNase Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. As quality parameter, only samples with an RNA integrity Number (RIN) of >7 according to RNA Nano Chip quality control (Agilent Technologies) on a Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) were used for analysis. Due to these quality requirements, RNA derived from tail hair was chosen for library preparation, as RIN values were more consistent and RNA concentration was high in comparison to RNA derived from to thinner rooted mane and coat hair samples. Indexed libraries were prepared using TruSeq RNA Library Prep Kit v2 (Illumina) and sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 500 (Illumina) in paired-end mode for 150 cycles. Fastq-files were quality controlled using fastqc (V 0.11.5). Mapping to the reference genome EquCab 2.0 was performed using STARaligner followed by splitting and trimming using GATK and counting using RSEM-package58. Sorting, duplicate marking and indexing was realized using Picard tools. Variant calling was done with HaplotypeCaller59.

Raw read counts were normalized as in60 and61. DEGs between curly coated and straight coated horses were studied by negative binominal tests as described in60. The same analyses were performed for group comparisons of mutant KRT25 versus wild type and mutant SP6 versus wild type. In order to reduce the proportion of false positive findings, raw p-values were FDR adjusted by Benjamini and Hochberg62. Global test procedures were carried out to identify group effects in subsets of genes63 related to specific gene ontology (GO) terms64. A global test can identify group effects in subsets of genes, even if no single gene is significant itself. All analyses were performed in the statistical programming environment R (V 3.2.2, www.r-project.org). Normalization and differential testing was performed using the R-package DESeq (V 1.22.1), global testing was done using the R-package RepeatedHighDim (V 2.0.0). GO term annotation was retrieved from the Ensembl data base using the R-package ‘biomaRt’65.


Validation of Expression Data

In total, 38 individuals composed of 14 curly coated ABCHs, two curly coated Missouri Foxtrotters, one curly coated Danish Warmblood, one curly coated Holsteiner, 10 straight coated ABCHs, eight straight coated QHs and two straight coated Missouri Foxtrotter were selected for validation. RNA quantity was adjusted to 500 ng and prepared for complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis with RT2 First Strand Kit (Qiagen). Assays of 21 genes in duplicates were chosen for RT2 Profiler PCR Array plate (Qiagen) design. GAPDH, B2M and ACTB served as housekeepers whereas Genomic DNA Control (GDC) CtGDC >35, Reverse Transcription Control (RTC) and Positive PCR Control (PPC) CtRTC-CtPPC <5, and CtPPC 20 ± 2 were used as quality parameters for each run. Cycles of 95°/10 minutes, 95°/60 minutes and 60°/1 minute (40×) were run on ABI7300 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). B2M was detected to be the most stable housekeeper. In addition, a TaqMan gene expression assay (Applied Biosystems) was applied for KRT25 as a control sample and B2M as housekeeping gene (Supplementary Table S15). Reactions comprising TaqMan expression master mix, assays and cDNA template were run in duplex mode for 40 cycles on ABI7300. Ct values ≥35 were considered a negative call. Level-x values were calculated using ΔΔCT method66 for straight coated horses as controls and curly coated horses as cases.

We performed a generalized linear model (GLM) analysis using Statistical Analysis System (SAS/Genetics, V 9.4, SAS Institute) to check the interrelation of the genotypes of the missense variants within KRT25 and SP6 and expression data. Genetic interactions were further investigated using GeneMANIA67, BioGRID68 and IntAct69.


Morphologic analysis

In total, three to four single hair fibers from coat, mane and tail were randomly selected from bunches of hair plucked from 21 horses. Each genotypic combination of KRT25 and SP6 variant occurring in our study population was represented by three individuals (Supplementary Table S16).

All hair samples were investigated using SEM. Mid sections were put onto a conductive glue pad, sputter-coated with a gold layer (Balzers Union SCD 040, Balzers, Liechtenstein, Germany) and scanned using a digital scanning microscope (Zeiss DSM 950, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). All samples were screened thoroughly in 100X, 500X and 1000X magnification.

In addition, cross and longitudinal sections were prepared. The hair pieces were fixed in glutaraldehyde, transferred to 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (SERVA Electrophoresis, Heidelberg, Germany) and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide-buffered solution. After that, the samples were dehydrated in ethanol, pre-infiltrated in epon derivate propylene-oxide and embedded. The enclosed sample blocks were incubated at 35 °C and 45 °C for 24 hours each followed by four days at 65 °C. Next, the blocks were cut into 0.5 µm sections on a rotation microtome (Ultracut E, Reichert-Jung, Unterschleissheim, München, Germany), and stained with toluidine blue (Waldeck, Münster, Germany). Coat hair samples could not be cut after embedding due to their too fragile structure. Longitudinal mid hair sections of guard hair fibers were investigated using a light microscope (Olympus BX51, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) with an Olympus camera DP72 and Olympus cellSens software in 40X and 100X magnification, whereas cross sections were scanned in 200X magnification. Here again, hair samples were compared with each other at mid sections.


Data availability

Sequence data were submitted to sequence read archive (SRA ID: SRR5591523, SRR5591591, SRR5591598; BioProject ID: PRJNA387659).

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Ludwig, A. et al. Coat color variation at the beginning of horse domestication. Science 324, 485 (2009).

  2. 2.

    Outram, A. K. et al. The earliest horse harnessing and milking. Science 323, 1332–1335 (2009).

  3. 3.

    Petersen, J. L. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals selection for important traits in domestic horse breeds. PLoS Genet 9, e1003211 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Mitlehner, W. Allergy against horses. Are curly horses an alternative for horse-allergic riders. Allergo J 22, 244–251 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Blakeslee, L., Hudson, R. & Hunt, H. Curly coat of horses. J. Hered. 34, 115–118 (1943).

  6. 6.

    Shchekin, V. & Kalaev, V. Inheritance of curliness in the horse. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 26, 262–263 (1940).

  7. 7.

    Scott, D. Skin of the neck, mane and tail of the curly horse. Equine Veterinary Education 16, 201–206 (2004).

  8. 8.

    Bowling, A. & Alderson, L. Population genetics of curly horses. Gent. cons. dom. livest. 186–202 (1990).

  9. 9.

    Sponenberg, D. Dominant curly coat in horses. Genet Select Evol 22, 1 (1990).

  10. 10.

    Thomas, S. & Alderson, L.The Curly Horse identification project of the CS fund conservancy (a case study) In Gent. cons. dom. livest. (ed L Alderson) 154–159 (CAB International, 1990).

  11. 11.

    Gandolfi, B. et al. The naked truth: Sphynx and Devon Rex cat breed mutations in KRT71. Mamm. Genome 21, 509–515 (2010).

  12. 12.

    Gandolfi, B. et al. To the root of the curl: a signature of a recent selective sweep identifies a mutation that defines the Cornish Rex cat breed. PLoS ONE 8, e67105 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Daetwyler, H. D. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle. Nat. Genet. 46, 858–865 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Cadieu, E. et al. Coat variation in the domestic dog is governed by variants in three genes. Science 326, 150–153 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Kuramoto, T., Hirano, R., Kuwamura, M. & Serikawa, T. Identification of the rat Rex mutation as a 7-bp deletion at splicing acceptor site of the Krt71 gene. J Vet Med Sci 72, 909–912 (2010).

  16. 16.

    Ishikawa, A., Hirunagi, K., Oda, S., Namikawa, T. & Tomita, T. Kinky coat, a new autosomal recessive mutation in the musk shrew, Suncus murinus. Jikken dobutsu. Experimental animals 41, 203–214 (1992).

  17. 17.

    Diribarne, M. et al. A deletion in exon 9 of the LIPH gene is responsible for the rex hair coat phenotype in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). PLoS ONE 6, e19281, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019281 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Rhoad, A. Woolly hair in swine. J. Hered. 25, 371–375 (1934).

  19. 19.

    Thibaut, S., Gaillard, O., Bouhanna, P., Cannell, D. & Bernard, B. Human hair shape is programmed from the bulb. Br J Dermatol 152, 632–638 (2005).

  20. 20.

    Gandolfi, B. et al. A splice variant in KRT71 is associated with curly coat phenotype of Selkirk Rex cats. Sci. Rep-UK 3 (2013).

  21. 21.

    Crew, F. & Auerbach, C. Rex: a dominant autosomal monogenic coat texture character in the mouse. J. Genet. 38, 341–344 (1939).

  22. 22.

    Kikkawa, Y. et al. A small deletion hotspot in the type II keratin gene mK6irs1/Krt2-6g on mouse chromosome 15, a candidate for causing the wavy hair of the caracul (Ca) mutation. Genetics 165, 721–733 (2003).

  23. 23.

    Johansson, I. Reduced phalanges and curly coat: Two mutant characters in native swedish cattle. Hereditas 28, 278–288 (1942).

  24. 24.

    Kjaer, K. W. et al. Novel Connexin 43 (GJA1) mutation causes oculo–dento–digital dysplasia with curly hair. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 127, 152–157 (2004).

  25. 25.

    Shimomura, Y. et al. Disruption of P2RY5, an orphan G protein–coupled receptor, underlies autosomal recessive woolly hair. Nat. Genet. 40, 335–339 (2008).

  26. 26.

    Shimomura, Y., Wajid, M., Petukhova, L., Kurban, M. & Christiano, A. M. Autosomal-dominant woolly hair resulting from disruption of keratin 74 (KRT74), a potential determinant of human hair texture. Am. J. Hum. Genet 86, 632–638 (2010).

  27. 27.

    Adzhubei, I. A. et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 7, 248–249 (2010).

  28. 28.

    Kumar, P., Henikoff, S. & Ng, P. C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1073–1081 (2009).

  29. 29.

    Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Thibaut, S., Barbarat, P., Leroy, F. & Bernard, B. A. Human hair keratin network and curvature. Int. J. Dermatol. 46, 7–10 (2007).

  31. 31.

    Piérard-Franchimont, C., Paquet, P., Quatresooz, P. & Piérard, G. E. Mechanobiology and cell tensegrity: the root of ethnic hair curling? J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 10, 163–167 (2011).

  32. 32.

    Tanaka, S. et al. Mutations in the helix termination motif of mouse type I IRS keratin genes impair the assembly of keratin intermediate filament. Genomics 90, 703–711 (2007).

  33. 33.

    Morgenthaler, C. et al. A missense variant in the coil1A domain of the keratin 25 gene is associated with the dominant curly hair coat trait (Crd) in horse. Genet Sel Evol 49, 85, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-017-0359-5 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Ito, M. et al. Wnt-dependent de novo hair follicle regeneration in adult mouse skin after wounding. Nature 447, 316–320, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05766 (2007).

  35. 35.

    Mardaryev, A. N. et al. Lhx2 differentially regulates Sox9, Tcf4 and Lgr5 in hair follicle stem cells to promote epidermal regeneration after injury. Development 138, 4843–4852, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.070284 (2011).

  36. 36.

    Ito, M. et al. Stem cells in the hair follicle bulge contribute to wound repair but not to homeostasis of the epidermis. Nat. Med. 11, 1351–1354, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1328 (2005).

  37. 37.

    Veniaminova, N. A. et al. Keratin 79 identifies a novel population of migratory epithelial cells that initiates hair canal morphogenesis and regeneration. Development 140, 4870–4880, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.101725 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Runkel, F. et al. Morphologic and molecular characterization of two novel Krt71 (Krt2-6g) mutations: Krt71 rco12 and Krt71 rco13. Mamm. Genome 17, 1172–1182 (2006).

  39. 39.

    Coletta, A. et al. Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles. BMC Syst. Biol. 4, 43, https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-43 (2010).

  40. 40.

    Nakamura, T. et al. The Krüppel-like factor epiprofin is expressed by epithelium of developing teeth, hair follicles, and limb buds and promotes cell proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 626–634 (2004).

  41. 41.

    Hertveldt, V. et al. The development of several organs and appendages is impaired in mice lacking Sp6. Dev. Dyn. 237, 883–892 (2008).

  42. 42.

    Smith, T. A. & Parry, D. A. Three-dimensional modelling of interchain sequence similarities and differences in the coiled-coil segments of keratin intermediate filament heterodimers highlight features important in assembly. J. Struct. Biol. 162, 139–151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2007.11.005 (2008).

  43. 43.

    Ansar, M. et al. A homozygous missense variant in type I keratin KRT25 causes autosomal recessive woolly hair. Journal of medical genetics 52, 676–680 (2015).

  44. 44.

    Langbein, L. et al. K25 (K25irs1), K26 (K25irs2), K27 (K25irs3), and K28 (K25irs4) represent the type I inner root sheath keratins of the human hair follicle. J. Invest. Dermatol. 126, 2377–2386, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700494 (2006).

  45. 45.

    Rogers, G. E. Electron microscope studies of hair and wool. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 83, 378–399 (1959).

  46. 46.

    Marshall, R. C., Orwin, D. F. & Gillespie, J. M. Structure and biochemistry of mammalian hard keratin. Electron Microsc. Rev. 4, 47–83 (1991).

  47. 47.

    Miller, S., Dykes, D. & Polesky, H. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic acids research 16, 1215 (1988).

  48. 48.

    Browning, B. L. & Browning, S. R. Genotype Imputation with Millions of Reference Samples. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98, 116–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.11.020 (2016).

  49. 49.

    Schmieder, R. & Edwards, R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27, 863–864, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026 (2011).

  50. 50.

    Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

  51. 51.

    Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

  52. 52.

    McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome research 20, 1297–1303 (2010).

  53. 53.

    Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strainw1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).

  54. 54.

    Abecasis, G. R., Cherny, S. S., Cookson, W. O. & Cardon, L. R. Merlin—rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat. Genet. 30, 97–101 (2002).

  55. 55.

    Thiele, H. & Nürnberg, P. HaploPainter: a tool for drawing pedigrees with complex haplotypes. Bioinformatics 21, 1730–1732 (2005).

  56. 56.

    Quadros, L., Ghosh, K. & Shetty, S. Establishment of a new mismatch PCR‐RFLP technique for detection of G10430A common mutation present in moderate to mild haemophilia B patients belonging to Gujarati community from the western part of India. Haemophilia 14, 628–629 (2008).

  57. 57.

    Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Research 45, D200–D203 (2016).

  58. 58.

    Team, R. C. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.[WWW document]. http://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed December 24, 2013] (2013).

  59. 59.

    DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).

  60. 60.

    Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome biology 11, 1 (2010).

  61. 61.

    Dillies, M.-A. et al. A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Briefings in bioinformatics 14, 671–683 (2013).

  62. 62.

    Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the royal statistical society. Series B (Methodological) 57, 289–300 (1995).

  63. 63.

    Jung, K., Becker, B., Brunner, E. & Beißbarth, T. Comparison of global tests for functional gene sets in two-group designs and selection of potentially effect-causing genes. Bioinformatics 27, 1377–1383 (2011).

  64. 64.

    Consortium, G. O. Gene ontology consortium: going forward. Nucleic acids research 43, D1049–D1056 (2015).

  65. 65.

    Durinck, S., Spellman, P. T., Birney, E. & Huber, W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nature protocols 4, 1184–1191 (2009).

  66. 66.

    Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. methods 25, 402–408 (2001).

  67. 67.

    Warde-Farley, D. et al. The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W214–220, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq537 (2010).

  68. 68.

    Stark, C. et al. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D535–539, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj109 (2006).

  69. 69.

    Orchard, S. et al. The MIntAct project–IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D358–363, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1115 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all horse breeders, owners and veterinarians for their assistance and for the supply of information. We gratefully acknowledge support from The North-German Supercomputing Alliance (HLRN) for HPC-resources that contributed to the presented results of research. We would like to thank H. Klippert-Hasberg, J. Vagt and M.K. Drabert, K. Rohn and J. Wrede for their help and support. This study has been funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, GZ: ME 4517/1-1).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, Hannover, 30559, Germany

    • Annika Thomer
    • , Maren Gottschalk
    • , Anna Christmann
    • , Fanny Naccache
    • , Klaus Jung
    • , Ottmar Distl
    •  & Julia Metzger
  2. Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, Hannover, 30559, Germany

    • Marion Hewicker-Trautwein

Authors

  1. Search for Annika Thomer in:

  2. Search for Maren Gottschalk in:

  3. Search for Anna Christmann in:

  4. Search for Fanny Naccache in:

  5. Search for Klaus Jung in:

  6. Search for Marion Hewicker-Trautwein in:

  7. Search for Ottmar Distl in:

  8. Search for Julia Metzger in:

Contributions

J.M. and O.D. designed the study. J.M., F.N., M.G., A.C. and A.T. collected all data. M.H.T. provided knowledge and equipment for morphological hair definition. O.D., K.J. and J.M. performed bioinformatics analyses. J.M. and A.T. performed sample preparation, experiments and data analysis, devised and completed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ottmar Distl.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24865-3

Rights and permissions

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.