Abstract
A new sample environment for the observation of ongoing chemical reactions is introduced for small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) experiments which enables structural changes to be followed continuously across a wide Q-range in response to changes in the chemical environment. The approach is demonstrated and validated by performing single and multiple potentiometric titrations on an aqueous anionic surfactant solution (oligo-oxyethylene alkylether carboxylic acid in D2O) with addition times varying from 1 s to 2 h. It is shown that the continuous flow set-up offers considerable advantages over classical ‘static’ measurements with regards to sample throughput, compositional precision and the ability to observe fast structural transitions. Finally, the capabilities and ongoing optimisation of the sample environment are discussed with reference to potential applications in the fields of biology, colloidal systems and complex soft matter.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The past two decades have seen steady progress in the development of complex soft-matter systems and structures1,2. Key to this development have been the breakthroughs and improvements in measurement and characterisation techniques enabling a progressively deeper understanding of the underlying processes and interactions as well as the, often intricate, nanostructures in which they result3,4,5. In order to keep pace with or even accelerate these advances, it is important that characterisation methods continue to improve and that techniques are developed which can provide high throughput, high quality data. One successful approach to this challenge has been through the use of in-situ measurements to observe, either continuously or at discrete intervals, an evolving system using a combination of characterisation techniques. In this way, a range of measurements can be performed simultaneously, enabling processes such as particle growth, spontaneous self-assembly or polymerisation to be followed in real time and allowing for rapid screening of experimental conditions6,7,8 or mapping of phase diagrams9,10. These techniques have become particularly prevalent in the field of synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), where the X-ray flux is high and it is possible to characterise samples efficiently and completely over very short time-scales. This capability is crucial when following dynamic processes, where it is not possible to perform further measurements or characterisation on intermediate states ex-situ. Moreover, even in cases where one could accurately reproduce many intermediate sample states, achieving the same resolution in the independent variable (e.g. sample composition, reagent concentration or monomer conversion) as for an equivalent in-situ experiment would not be possible due to the limited experimental time. For these reasons, there are a plethora of high throughput, in-situ sample environments available, combining SAXS measurements with a wide variety of complementary techniques, including: Raman spectroscopy11,12,13, UV-Visible spectroscopy12,14, Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy15, fluorescence spectroscopy16 and conductivity17, turbidity12 and pH18,19 measurements.
Although synchrotron SAXS sources enable the measurement of very small sample volumes (due to tightly focussed beams) with high time resolution (typical flux at the sample position is ~1013 photons s-1)20, there are a number of reasons why they may not always be appropriate for the characterisation of soft condensed matter or biological structures. Firstly, due to the similar X-ray scattering length densities (SLDs) of organic materials, the contrast between different constituents of multicomponent systems is often low and difficult to model to the required degree of precision. Secondly, such materials are often prone to radiation damage, whereby the X-rays irreversibly alter the structure or chemistry of the samples21. By conducting small-angle scattering experiments with neutrons, rather than X-rays, it is possible to circumvent these issues. Not only does the non-systematic relationship between neutron scattering lengths and atomic mass numbers give rise to superior contrast conditions in multicomponent soft matter systems (particularly when used in conjunction with contrast variation techniques22), neutrons also do not cause radiation damage, even to sensitive biological systems23,24,25. In general, the drawbacks of the small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) technique are often cited as the lower flux (and therefore longer acquisition times/lower time resolution) and larger beam size (i.e. greater sample volume)24,26 and, as a result, the development of sample environments for SANS instruments is much less advanced than for their SAXS equivalents. However, due to a confluence of two important factors, this paradigm may be about to shift. Firstly, recent years have seen the refurbishment of many SANS instruments, benefiting from larger and faster detectors and improved coating technology in the guides27,28,29, leading to higher effective flux. Furthermore, a number of high-flux sources have recently come on-line or are expected to do so with the next few years30,31,32. Secondly, the total number of neutron scattering facilities worldwide is in decline and the amount of experimental time at SANS instruments is expected to fall33. The challenge, therefore, is to exploit the improvements at the facility level and mitigate the effects of decreasing experimental time, by expanding the range of in-situ sample environments available on SANS instruments. This will, in turn, allow the biological and soft matter communities to explore complex phenomena that have hitherto remained inaccessible to small-angle scattering experiments.
There has already been some recent progress in the development of SANS sample environments, particularly in the field of microfluidics, where high-resolution, rapid prototyping of sample cells has been used in conjunction with high-flux beamlines to investigate the flow-response of lyotropic, lamellar phases34 and perform rapid and detailed contrast-matching experiments35. Elsewhere, a number of custom-made environments have shown excellent promise including: simultaneous SANS and dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements36,37, simultaneous SANS and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC)38 and in-situ SANS and pH measurements39. However, in each case, the experiments were complicated to set up and have not seen widespread up-take. In this letter, a chemical reactor with a flow-through observation cell is presented which enables the effects of changes in chemical composition, e.g. due to ongoing chemical reactions, to be measured continuously. This approach not only increases the informational content of the experiment, via high-throughput and compositional precision, it also reduces the likelihood of data gaps arising whenever rapid transitions occur. In addition, the combination of high compositional precision and time-resolution allows for the exploration of non-equilibrium states that would go unnoticed in a classical ‘static’ approach. It will also enable systematic investigations to be conducted of unstable regions in phase diagrams, opening the door for a potential exploitation of non-equilibrium phenomena. In conjunction with the advantage of contrast variation unique to neutrons, the sample environment also offers new perspectives to the biology and soft matter communities to investigate multi-component systems as they evolve during chemical reactions or biochemical processes. The feasibility and capabilities of the set-up are demonstrated herein via an investigation of the morphological evolution that occurs in an aqueous surfactant system as a result of changes in pH and salt concentration.
Results
The sample environment was characterised using aqueous solutions of polyoxyethylene alkylether carboxylic acids (AECs), a class of surfactants with strongly pH-responsive properties40,41,42. AECs are made up of three distinct components, a hydrophobic alkyl chain, a hydrophilic polyoxyethylene block and a terminal hydrophilic carboxyl group. Although superficially similar to non-ionic polyoxyethylene alkylethers, the presence of an ionisable component imparts rather different properties and self-assembly phase behaviour to AECs compared to their non-ionic analogues43,44. In turn, these, often enhanced, properties have given rise to a wide range of applications from detergency45 and textile processing46 to enhanced oil recovery47,48,49. The complex, pH-dependent phase behaviour makes AECs an ideal candidate for the characterisation and commissioning of the continuous flow chemical reactor sample environment. Specifically, the AEC, oligo-oxyethylene(5) lauryl ether carboxylic acid, shown in Fig. 1, is known to undergo a dramatic structural transition between large vesicles and small micelles over a narrow pH range40,42, as the effective surface area of the head-group increases due to electrostatic repulsion. It was therefore selected for further study in this work. The experimental set-up, shown schematically and photographically in Fig. 2, comprised: a reaction vessel, a pH electrode, a peristaltic pump, an observation cell and two syringe pumps. SANS measurements were performed on the D11 instrument at the ILL neutron scattering facility in Grenoble with a wavelength of 6 Å and maximum flux of 108 neutrons cm-2s-1 at the sample position27. The pD (= -log \({{\rm{C}}}_{{{\rm{D}}}_{{\rm{3}}}{\rm{O}}}\)+) of the solutions was varied by addition of NaOD (0.1 M or 1 M in D2O) and DCl (1 M in D2O) to the solution, where NaOD and DCl are the deuterated analogues of NaOH and HCl respectively. Further experimental details are provided in the Methods section.
In order to characterise the time resolution of the continuous flow set-up, an initial ‘fast-addition’ experiment was performed, whereby 1.2 mL of 1 M NaOD were added to 45.5 mL aqueous surfactant solution over 1.2 s and data were acquired continuously with a frequency of 1 s−1. The pD measured at the electrode in the solution changed instantaneously on addition of NaOD (within the 1 s time resolution of the measurement, see Fig. 3a) whilst the form of the azimuthally-averaged scattering data evolved over the course of approximately 6 s, after which time no further changes were observed (see Fig. 3b). It can be readily seen, both from the size of the error bars as well as the well-defined form of the scattering curves, that a 1 s exposure is adequate to provide data of sufficient quality for further analysis, even for absolute scattering intensities close to 1 cm-1. The observed changes in the scattering curves are ascribed to homogenisation of the sample in the observation cell. This is considered likely for two reasons: firstly, the time taken for the surfactant solution to complete one circulation of the flow loop was determined to be ~5 s (details can be found in section S4 of the Supporting Information). Secondly, measurements of the response time for the vesicle-to-micelle transition following a pH-jump, in a similar system containing decanoic acid/decanoate, showed structural rearrangements taking place within 50 ms50.
Once the homogenisation time of the set-up had been determined, an experiment was undertaken to follow the structural evolution of the self-assembled surfactant aggregates at a high resolution with respect to the pD of the solution. This was done by changing the pD from an initial value of ~2.5 up to ~12 via the slow, continuous addition of 12 mL of 0.1 M NaOD over 2 hours, with an addition rate of 0.1 mL/min. The titration was performed three times, once at each sample-to-detector distance, in order to follow the structural evolution over a broad Q-range. The titration curves for the repeat measurements at different detector configurations are shown in Fig. 4c in order to establish the validity of combining scattering data from separate measurements. The resulting SANS curves from the three different experiments are shown in Fig. 4a, combined according to the volume of titrant added and rebinned to reduce the number of data points (details of the rebinning procedure are given in section S2 the Supporting Information). The overlap between the detector configurations is very good, further demonstrating the validity of this approach. Without making any prior assumptions as to the morphology of the self-assembled structures, observation of the scattering curves enables the identification of a number of noteworthy trends. At low pD, the surfactant molecules self-assemble into large, locally-flat structures (such as vesicles or bilayers) as evidenced by the Q-2 dependence. As the pD increases, the morphology gradually evolves to favour smaller, interacting structures, as shown by the drop in intensity at low-Q and the appearance of a distinct structure factor peak at 0.035 Å-1. These changes occur between pD 3 and pD 6, due to the ionisation of the surfactant head-group42. Thereafter, once the head-group is fully charged, the form of the scattering remains constant up to pD 12.
The azimuthally-averaged intensity was analysed according to a two-component model42 consisting of a population of non-interacting, unilamellar, core-shell vesicles and a population of oblate ellipsoidal core-shell micelles interacting via a charged hard sphere structure factor. In both cases, the hydrophobic component was considered to be anhydrous and the EO shell was assumed to be partially hydrated. A full description of the model can be found in section S3 of the Supporting Information. Nonlinear least-squares fits were performed by allowing the fraction of surfactant in micellar form, micellar radii, hard sphere radius, vesicle radius and vesicle polydispersity to refine. Fits were conducted on an absolute scale and the following constraints were imposed, based on the experimental conditions and geometric considerations concerning the surfactant molecule. The volume fraction of dispersed material was fixed to the calculated value based on the volumes of: surfactant, D2O, acid and base in the reaction vessel for the given measurement, the shell thickness of the micelles could not exceed the length of a fully extended EO block (16 Å)51,52 and the semi-minor axis of the micelle cores could not exceed the length of a fully extended hydrophobic block (16 Å)53. The total thickness of the vesicle shells was fixed at 29 Å in accordance with previous work42. In addition, to ascertain the effects of continuous flow on the self-assembled structures, SANS measurements were performed on the surfactant solution under both static and flow conditions. Although some alignment of the anisotropic structures was observed at low pD, the azimuthally-averaged scattering data showed no significant differences between static and flow conditions (Figure S2) and shear effects are therefore not considered in the following discussion of the results. The results are described in section S4 of the Supporting Information and the advantages and disadvantages of measuring samples under flow conditions are discussed in more detail in the discussion section.
From Fig. 5a, showing representative fit curves, it can be seen that the model is able to capture the evolution of the scattering patterns with a high fidelity. Coupled with the continuous nature of the measurement and the consequent high volume of scattering data, this allowed for the comparison of experimentally determined structural parameters such as the size, fraction of surfactant in micellar form and water content of the aggregates to be followed as a function of the experimental variable, pD. The results are shown in Fig. 5b–d. At low pD, prior to the addition of NaOD, the surfactant self-assembles into large, polydisperse, locally-flat structures, as indicated by the extended Q-2 scattering power law as shown in Fig. 4a and as has been reported previously54. These structures are interpreted in the model as a mixture of large vesicles and ellipsoidal micelles. Although the overall size and polydispersity of the vesicles cannot be properly determined as they fall outside of the probed Q-range (i.e. >2500 Å), and the presence of extended bilayers cannot be ruled out, the vesicle interpretation was considered more probable, given the appearance of smaller vesicles at high pD and in the presence of an inert salt (vide infra). The volume fraction of ellipsoidal micelles with respect to vesicles is given in Fig. 5b, it confirms and quantifies the rapid transition from vesicles to micelles in the pD range 4–6. This pD range also sees a dramatic change in the shape of the ellipsoidal micelles with the semi-major axis (i.e. the larger of the two cross-sectional radii) decreasing from ~200 Å to 30 Å, as can be observed in Fig. 5c. The geometry of an ellipsoid with a 15:1 ratio between major and minor axes is shown schematically in 5e. These quasi disc-like objects would account for both the extended Q−2 dependence at low pD, as well as the observed alignment behaviour under flow. Above pD values of ~6, the self-assembled structures appear to be almost exclusively (>97%) micellar, where the form of the micelles is much closer to the ‘traditional’ spherical conception of surfactant-based micelles. The volume fraction of D2O in the micelle shell, as calculated from the fitted parameters, increases with increasing pD (shown in 5d). In this case, the variability between points is considerably higher than for the geometric parameters, however the general trend is clear; significant hydration of the EO block in the shell occurs as the pD increases from 4 to 6. This increase in hydration is a direct consequence of the increasing electrostatic repulsion between the carboxylic headgroups as the degree of ionisation increases.
A final investigation was conducted with a view to simulating more complex experimental conditions, where multiple components or reagents are added at predetermined times during the reaction, or where the reversibility of a process is to be investigated. Within the context of a titration experiment, the additional complexity was achieved by observation of the scattering over multiple successive potentiometric titrations of NaOD and DCl. This experimental protocol gives rise to a progressively increasing NaCl concentration in the surfactant solution which increases to 24 mM after the first DCl addition and 48 mM after second addition (see the Methods section for further details). To make most efficient use of the available time, the scattering was measured continuously during the additions at a single detector configuration (mid-Q), with pauses between and half-way through each addition to measure the full Q-range. In this way it was possible to both observe the structural evolution in continuous fashion over the most relevant size regime and also have regular access to the complete scattering picture. The scattering and titration data are given in Fig. 4b and d respectively. Comparing the fitted parameters in Figs 5 and 6, a number of effects arising from the increasing salt concentration can be immediately identified. Figure 6b shows that the shape of the ellipsoidal micelles does not appear to be strongly influenced by the presence of NaCl. The largest dimensions, present in Fig. 5c at low pD, do not appear, as the fraction of surfactant in micellar form drops to zero. This can be seen in Fig. 6c, which shows that at pD < 4, the surfactant is entirely in vesicle form and at pD > 6 the surfactant is entirely micellar (in contrast to the salt-free solution where both components are present at all pD values). Furthermore, the presence of an inert salt has a pronounced effect on the radius of the vesicles formed at low pD. The plateau at low-Q and the oscillations in the scattered intensity reveal that the vesicles are both an order of magnitude smaller (from >2500 Å to ~120 Å) and much less polydisperse in the presence of salt, this is also reflected in the fitted parameters shown in Figure S4 in the Supporting Information. This effect has since been observed in other AEC systems55. It is also worth noting that radii of 109 to 128 Å are uncommonly low and such small vesicles are only rarely seen, for example when induced by the presence of a cosurfactant in ionic surfactant systems56. Finally, it can be seen that the overall aggregate size depends not only on the pD of the solution and the salt concentration but also on the ‘direction of travel’. On addition of DCl, the mean aggregation number begins to increase, due to the formation of vesicles, at pD 5, reaching a maximum at pD 3.5. On subsequent addition of NaOD however, the vesicles appear to persist up to pD 4.5, and the smaller aggregation number, corresponding to the surfactant in micellar form, is regained at pD 6.0. It is thought that the reasons behind this hysteresis behaviour may be due to the slower kinetics exhibited by the vesicles as compared to the micelles. This disparity is expected and can be ascribed to the much larger aggregation number in the case of the vesicles. Crucially, although the results in Fig. 6b and c could, in principle, have been found using conventional static measurements (although in practice this would not be possible as experimental time at large scale facilities is limited), the results in Fig. 6d could only be observed using a continuous flow sample environment.
The purpose of highlighting the aforementioned features in the scattering data is primarily to demonstrate the type of detailed information that can be extracted from in-situ scattering experiments of complex, evolving systems. It must be noted that describing systems which contain structures of different shape and size, a common occurrence in evolving systems, generally requires a large number of free parameters. Although this will introduce a certain degree of ambiguity in the results (due to correlations between dimension parameters of similar size for example), these ambiguities can be mitigated by the addition of information gained from other sources or techniques. In this case, the maximum dimensions of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic components of the molecule are known and can be constrained within the fit. As a result, the fits are robust and the trends are clear. In summary, as long as the limitations are not ignored, it is possible to extract a large amount information from in-situ scattering experiments, despite their apparent complexity.
Discussion
In this work, a continuous-flow chemical reactor sample environment has been demonstrated and characterised via a potentiometric titration experiment. The set-up permits complex reactions with multiple reagents to be monitored with a time-resolution down to 6 s. Critically, this allows chemical reactions to be monitored in real time, providing insights into mesoscopic structural changes and non-equilibrium structures that may occur as the system evolves. It is quick and straightforward to assemble and enables the efficient collection of large amounts of data with respect to equivalent experiments conducted via discrete reaction sampling which would require both more time and a larger sample volume. The sample environment can be controlled entirely from the SANS instrument control platform and has been designed to be as easy to use and robust as possible so that it can be made available to all interested users with successful beam-time applications.
As was touched upon in the results section, use of the continuous flow set-up detailed in this work, necessarily entails observing samples under shear. The existence of shear forces acting on the sample along the flow-loop and in the quartz sample cell presents both advantages and disadvantages when devising experimental protocols. On the one hand, the application of a shear field (as occurs during simple stirring for example) is known to cause changes in the morphology of certain soft matter systems57,58,59,60,61,62 and may introduce additional complexity to subsequent data analysis. On the other hand, shear forces can be used to align anisotropic particles, whereupon preferred orientation can be exploited to gain additional information on the size, form, and symmetry of the structures under investigation63,64,65,66,67. If anisotropy is present, it can be evaluated straightforwardly, even across very large datasets, using software such as SASET68 (freely available on request), to provide an insight into how the anisotropy evolves during an experiment. An example of such an analysis is demonstrated in Figure S3. Crucially however, as the flow-rate of the peristaltic pump can be continuously varied over a wide range (0–90 mL/min), the wall shear rate in the sample cell (τ w ~0-920 s−1) can be adapted to suit the requirements of each individual experiment (c.f. wall shear rates in human blood vessels69,70 reach up to 1500 s−1).
Work is ongoing to shorten the flow-loop and reduce the sample volume from ~50 mL to ~5 mL. A 25 mL sealable, jacketed reactor vessel (pictured in Fig. 7) has already been tested successfully and a 5 mL version is currently under commissioning. This will extend the range of potential applications to cover systems where large sample volumes are unavailable or impractical. It will also reduce the homogenisation time down to the order of 1 s, making the continuous flow technique complementary to existing stopped-flow type methods with the advantages of a higher number of possible reagents (limited only by the number of syringe pumps) and the ability to perform additions at any point during the measurement (i.e. during course of the reaction). In conjunction with the temperature control capability included in the forthcoming iteration, this will allow for experiments of almost limitless complexity. It is also envisaged that additional complementary characterisation techniques will be included within the flow loop. Aside from pH electrodes, these will include: conductivity and turbidity probes, refractometry, viscometry, densitometry, UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy and Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (FTIR). The exact configuration of auxiliary instruments can then be chosen based on the sample system under investigation and the desired experimental outcomes.
In principle, there are three criteria that determine whether an in-situ continuous-flow SANS set-up is required for a given experimental system; the presence of one or more organic components, structures (or features) in the 1–100 nanometre size range and, crucially, structural transitions that occur in response to compositional alterations. Although these criteria do not explicitly rule out the possibility of performing analogous ‘static’ measurements, whereby every composition is prepared and measured individually, in most cases it would be impossible to match the time-efficiency and compositional resolution provided by the equivalent continuous-flow measurement. These criteria encompass a wide range of possible experiments across many scientific disciplines from vesicular transport in cells71 through polymerisation-induced self-assembly (PISA)72 and nanoparticle theranostic applications73 to pH triggered self-assembly of biomolecules74. Examples of possible experimental systems that could benefit from in-situ SANS measurements, alongside appropriate complementary techniques, are given in Fig. 7. The examples given are far from exhaustive but are provided to highlight the broad applicability of the continuous-flow approach and demonstrate possible auxiliary instrument configurations.
In summary, with regards to the ongoing decline in the overall number of neutron scattering facilities worldwide and the resulting reduction in availability of experimental time, it is clearly crucial for the soft matter community to devise more efficient experiments and maximise the informational content and sample throughput of their neutron scattering experiments. In this regard, the recent and forthcoming improvements in flux and Q-ranges at many beamlines represent a major opportunity; as the acquisition times come down, the number of sample systems that are amenable to continuous-flow SANS measurements will increase. This, in turn, will allow users to branch out from the ubiquitous ‘static’ measurements into a wide variety of in-situ measurements that have hitherto been performed either predominantly or exclusively with X-rays including: polymerisations9,75, nanoparticle synthesis76,77 and self-assembly78,79 and the characterisation of biological structures80. The work presented herein has demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of this approach and lays the foundations for future, more complex sample environment architectures.
Methods
For each measurement, a 100 mL, 3-necked round-bottomed flask was charged with 50 g of D2O and ~0.51 g of oligo-oxyethylene(5) lauryl ether carboxylic acid surfactant (1 wt%, commercially known as AKYPO RLM 45 CA, Kao Corp., Japan). The solution was stirred and continuously circulated through a 1 mm path length flow-cell (Hellma, Germany) positioned in the neutron beam, using a peristaltic pump (100 series, Williamson, UK) at a flow rate of approximately 60 mL/min. Syringe pumps (NE-1010, New Era Pump Systems, USA) were used to dispense NaOD and DCl solutions (0.1 M in D2O for the initial measurements and 1 M in D2O for the hysteresis measurements). The syringe pumps were controlled remotely throughout the experiment via the ILL instrument control platform, NOMAD. The pD was measured by recording the potential difference over a pH electrode (via the analogue output port of an F20 pH meter, Mettler Toledo, USA) and subsequently converting the result into a pD value by means of a previously performed calibration, noting that pD = pH + 0.4, where pH is the value displayed on the pH-meter81. Neutron scattering measurements were carried out at the D11 beamline at the ILL (Grenoble, France). To fully capture the structure of the micelles, three sample-to-detector distances were used (1.5 m, 8 m and 34 m, with collimation lengths of 1.5 m, 8 m and 34 m respectively) with a wavelength of 6 Å, giving a Q-range of 0.0015 – 0.42 Å−1. Three separate potentiometric titrations were performed. The first consisted of a rapid addition (1.2 mL over 1.2 s, i.e. 60 mL/min) of 1 M NaOD to the aqueous surfactant solution at a detector distance of 8 m (Q-range: 0.008 – 0.08 Å−1) and measurements were performed continuously with a frequency of 1 s−1. The second experiment consisted of a slow addition (12 mL over 2 hours, i.e. 0.1 mL/min) of 0.1 M NaOD to the aqueous surfactant solution. SANS was measured continuously (120 × 60 s measurements) and the procedure was repeated under identical conditions at the three detector configurations. The final experiment, to observe the hysteresis behaviour and effect of salt concentration, consisted of two successive additions of 1 M DCl and 1 M NaOD (1.2 mL over 24 mins, i.e. 0.05 mL/min, paused at 0.6 mL to allow for measurement at additional detector distances). In this case, SANS was measured continuously during addition at a detector distance of 8 m, and additionally at the 1.5 m and 34 m configurations at the beginning, end and midway through each addition. Details of the data reduction are given in the section S1 Supporting Information.
Data availability
The datasets generated during the current study are available in the ILL data repository82: http://doi.ill.fr/10.5291/ILL-DATA.INTER-354.
References
Lehn, J.-M. Perspectives in Chemistry-Steps towards Complex Matter. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 52, 2836–2850, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201208397 (2013).
Lutz, J.-F., Lehn, J.-M., Meijer, E. W. & Matyjaszewski, K. From precision polymers to complex materials and systems. Nature Reviews Materials 1, 16024, https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.24 (2016).
Di Cola, E., Grillo, I. & Ristori, S. Small Angle X-ray and Neutron Scattering: Powerful Tools for Studying the Structure of Drug-Loaded Liposomes. Pharmaceutics 8, 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics8020010 (2016).
Franken, L. E., Boekema, E. J. & Stuart, M. C. A. Transmission Electron Microscopy as a Tool for the Characterization of Soft Materials: Application and Interpretation. Advanced Science 4, 1600476, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600476 (2017).
Nevskyi, O., Sysoiev, D., Oppermann, A., Huhn, T. & Wöll, D. Nanoscopic Visualization of Soft Matter Using Fluorescent Diarylethene Photoswitches. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55, 12698–12702, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201606791 (2016).
Khodakov, A. Y., Zholobenko, V. L., Impéror-Clerc, M. & Durand, D. Characterization of the Initial Stages of SBA-15 Synthesis by in Situ Time-Resolved Small-Angle X-ray Scattering. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109, 22780–22790, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp052786z (2005).
Kjellman, T. & Alfredsson, V. The use of in situ and ex situ techniques for the study of the formation mechanism of mesoporous silica formed with non-ionic triblock copolymers. Chemical Society Reviews 42, 3777–3791, https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35298B (2013).
Schwemmer, F. et al. LabDisk for SAXS: a centrifugal microfluidic sample preparation platform for small-angle X-ray scattering. Lab on a Chip 16, 1161–1170, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC01580D (2016).
Derry, M. J. et al. In situ small-angle X-ray scattering studies of sterically-stabilized diblock copolymer nanoparticles formed during polymerization-induced self-assembly in non-polar media. Chemical Science 7, 5078–5090, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SC01243D (2016).
Wang, Z. et al. The non-equilibrium phase diagrams of flow-induced crystallization and melting of polyethylene. Scientific Reports 6, 32968, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32968 (2016).
Bentrup, U. et al. Linking Simultaneous In Situ WAXS/SAXS/Raman with Raman/ATR/UV–vis Spectroscopy: Comprehensive Insight into the Synthesis of Molybdate Catalyst Precursors. Topics in Catalysis 52, 1350–1359, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-009-9309-y (2009).
Haas, S., Plivelic, T. S. & Dicko, C. Combined SAXS/UV–vis/Raman as a Diagnostic and Structure Resolving Tool in Materials and Life Sciences Applications. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 118, 140212160327008, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp412229j (2014).
Seddon, A. M. et al. Control of Nanomaterial Self-Assembly in Ultrasonically Levitated Droplets. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 7, 1341–1345, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00449 (2016).
Chen, X. et al. Simultaneous SAXS/WAXS/UV–Vis Study of the Nucleation and Growth of Nanoparticles: A Test of Classical Nucleation Theory. Langmuir 31, 11678–11691, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02759 (2015).
Marcelli, A., Hampai, D., Xu, W., Malfatti, L. & Innocenzi, P. Time Resolved IR and X-Ray Simultaneous Spectroscopy: New Opportunities for the Analysis of Fast Chemical-Physical Phenomena in Materials Science. Acta Physica Polonica A 115, 489–500, https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.115.489 (2009).
Del Giudice, A., Dicko, C., Galantini, L. & Pavel, N. V. Time-Dependent pH Scanning of the Acid-Induced Unfolding of Human Serum Albumin Reveals Stabilization of the Native Form by Palmitic Acid Binding. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 121, 4388–4399, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b01342 (2017).
Wurm, A. et al. Crystallization of poly(ε-caprolactone)/MWCNT composites: A combined SAXS/WAXS, electrical and thermal conductivity study. Polymer 55, 2220–2232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.069 (2014).
Phan, S. et al. Structural Aspects of Digestion of Medium Chain Triglycerides Studied in Real Time Using sSAXS and Cryo-TEM. Pharmaceutical Research 30, 3088–3100, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-013-1108-2 (2013).
Khan, J., Hawley, A., Rades, T. & Boyd, B. J. In Situ Lipolysis and Synchrotron Small-Angle X-ray Scattering for the Direct Determination of the Precipitation and Solid-State Form of a Poorly Water-Soluble Drug During Digestion of a Lipid-Based Formulation. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 105, 2631–2639, https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.24634 (2016).
Vaerenbergh, P. V. et al. An upgrade beamline for combined wide, small and ultra small-angle x-ray scattering at the esrf. AIP Conference Proceedings 1741, 030034, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4952857 (2016).
Brooks-Bartlett, J. C. et al. Development of tools to automate quantitative analysis of radiation damage in SAXS experiments. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 24, 63–72, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577516015083 (2017).
Banc, A. et al. Small angle neutron scattering contrast variation reveals heterogeneities of interactions in protein gels. Soft Matter 12, 5340–5352, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM00710D (2016).
Niimura, N. & Podjarny, A. The basic principles and experimental configurations of neutron diffraction experiments. In Neutron Protein Crystallography, 1–49 (Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578863.003.0001 2011)
Tang, K.-H. & Blankenship, R. E. Neutron and light scattering studies of light-harvesting photosynthetic antenna complexes. Photosynthesis Research 111, 205–217, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-011-9665-x (2012).
Zhang-Haagen, B. et al. Monomeric Amyloid Beta Peptide in Hexafluoroisopropanol Detected by Small Angle Neutron Scattering. PLOS ONE 11, e0150267, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150267 (2016).
Wyslouzil, B. E., Wilemski, G., Strey, R., Seifert, S. & Winans, R. E. Small angle X-ray scattering measurements probe water nanodroplet evolution under highly non-equilibrium conditions. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 9, 5353, https://doi.org/10.1039/b709363b (2007).
Lindner, P. & Schweins, R. The D11 Small-Angle Scattering Instrument: A New Benchmark for SANS. Neutron News 21, 15–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/10448631003697985 (2010).
Cooper-Jensen, C. P. et al. “m=1” coatings for neutron guides. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 528, 012005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/528/1/012005 (2014).
Dewhurst, C. D. Novel multiple-beam very small angle neutron scattering (VSANS) using a conventional SANS instrument. Journal of Applied Crystallography 47, 1180–1189, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576714012801 (2014).
Peng, M. et al. A new small-angle neutron scattering spectrometer at China Mianyang research reactor. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 810, 63–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2015.11.141 (2016).
Jaksch, S. et al. Concept for a time-of-flight Small Angle Neutron Scattering instrument at the European Spallation Source. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 762, 22–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.04.024 (2014).
Sokolova, A. et al. BILBY: Time-of-Flight Small Angle Scattering Instrument. Neutron News 27, 9–13, https://doi.org/10.1080/10448632.2016.1163980 (2016).
Cartlidge, E. Europe on course for a neutron drought. Science 351, 1252–1252, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.351.6279.1252 (2016).
Lopez, C. G., Watanabe, T., Martel, A., Porcar, L. & Cabral, J. T. Microfluidic-SANS: flow processing of complex fluids. Scientific Reports 5, 7727, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07727 (2015).
Adamo, M. et al. Rapid contrast matching by microfluidic SANS. Lab on a Chip 17, 1559–1569, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7LC00179G (2017).
Nawroth, T., Buch, P., Buch, K., Langguth, P. & Schweins, R. Liposome Formation from Bile Salt–Lipid Micelles in the Digestion and Drug Delivery Model FaSSIF mod Estimated by Combined Time-Resolved Neutron and Dynamic Light Scattering. Molecular Pharmaceutics 8, 2162–2172, https://doi.org/10.1021/mp100296w (2011).
Kohlbrecher, J., Bollhalder, A., Vavrin, R. & Meier, G. A high pressure cell for small angle neutron scattering up to 500 MPa in combination with light scattering to investigate liquid samples. Review of Scientific Instruments 78, 125101, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2817632 (2007).
Jordan, A. et al. SEC-SANS: size exclusion chromatography combined in situ with small-angle neutron scattering. Journal of Applied Crystallography 49, 2015–2020, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576716016514 (2016).
Mariani, G., Moldenhauer, D., Schweins, R. & Gröhn, F. Elucidating Electrostatic Self-Assembly: Molecular Parameters as Key to Thermodynamics and Nanoparticle Shape. Journal of the American Chemical Society 138, 1280–1293, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b11497 (2016).
Vlachy, N. et al. Spontaneous formation of bilayers and vesicles in mixtures of single-chain alkyl carboxylates: Effect of pH and aging and cytotoxicity studies. Langmuir 24, 9983–9988, https://doi.org/10.1021/la800713z (2008).
Sakai, T., Ikoshi, R., Toshida, N. & Kagaya, M. Thermodynamically stable vesicle formation and vesicle-to-micelle transition of single-tailed anionic surfactant in water. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 117, 5081–5089, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp402314f (2013). PMID: 23560707.
Chiappisi, L. Polyoxyethylene alkylether carboxylic acids: an overview of a neglected class of surfactants with multiresponsive properties. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 250, 79–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.10.001 (2017).
Binana-Limbelé, W., Zana, R. & Platone, E. Micellar properties of ethoxylated sodium alkylcarboxylates. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 124, 647–651, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(88)90202-0 (1988).
Dong, R. & Hao, J. Complex Fluids of Poly(oxyethylene) Monoalkyl Ether Nonionic Surfactants. Chemical Reviews 110, 4978–5022, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9003743 (2010).
Hollis, G. L. (ed.) Surfactants Europa (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2007).
Li, T., Koey, L. C. & González, S. Composition and method for treating textiles (2007).
Chiu, Y. C. & Hwang, H. J. The use of carboxymethyl ethoxylates in enhanced oil recovery. Colloids and Surfaces 28, 53–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6622(87)80166-X (1987).
Czichocki, G., Holzbauer, H.-R. & Martens, C. Eigenschaften, Anwendungsgebiete und physiko-chemische Untersuchungen von Polyethercarbonsäuren und ihren Salzen. Fett Wissenschaft Technologie/Fat Science Technology 94, 66–73, https://doi.org/10.1002/lipi.19920940209 (1992).
Negin, C., Ali, S. & Xie, Q. Most common surfactants employed in chemical enhanced oil recovery. Petroleum 3, 197–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2016.11.007 (2017).
Morigaki, K., Walde, P., Misran, M. & Robinson, B. H. Thermodynamic and kinetic stability. Properties of micelles and vesicles formed by the decanoic acid/decanoate system. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 213, 37–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00336-9 (2003).
Tanford, C., Nozaki, Y. & Rohde, M. F. Size and shape of globular micelles formed in aqueous solution by n-alkyl polyoxyethylene ethers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry 81, 1555–1560, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100531a007 (1977).
Bartlett, J. R. & Cooney, R. P. Raman spectroscopic studies of poly(oxyethylene) chain conformations in non-ionic surfactants. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases 82, 597–605, https://doi.org/10.1039/F19868200597 (1986).
Tanford, C. Micelle shape and size. The Journal of Physical Chemistry 76, 3020–3024, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100665a018 (1972).
Renoncourt, A. et al. Spontaneous vesicle formation of an industrial single-chain surfactant at acidic ph and at room-temperature. ChemPhysChem 7, 1892–1896, https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200600125 (2006).
Yue, X., Fan, X., Li, Q., Chen, X. & Wang, C. Aggregation behaviors of alkyl ether carboxylate surfactants in water. Journal of Molecular Liquids 227, 161–167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.010 (2017).
Beck, R. et al. Phase behavior, structure, and physical properties of the quaternary system tetradecyldimethylamine oxide, hcl, 1-hexanol, and water. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 221, 200–209, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1999.6554 (2000).
Bergmeier, M., Hoffmann, H. & Thunig, C. Preparation and Properties of Ionically Charged Lamellar Phases That Are Produced without Shearing. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 101, 5767–5771, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp971163l (1997).
Hoffmann, H., Bergmeier, M., Gradzielski, M. & Thunig, C. Preparation of three morphologically different states of a lamellar phase. In Horizons 2000 – aspects of colloid and interface science at the turn of the millenium, 13–20 (Steinkopff, Darmstadt. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0118152 1998).
Escalante, J. I., Gradzielski, M., Hoffmann, H. & Mortensen, K. Shear-Induced Transition of Originally Undisturbed Lamellar Phase to Vesicle Phase †. Langmuir 16, 8653–8663, https://doi.org/10.1021/la000242c (2000).
Rangelov, S., Almgren, M., Tsvetanov, C. & Edwards, K. Shear-induced rearrangement of self-assembled PEG-lipids structures in water. Macromolecules 35, 7074–7081, https://doi.org/10.1021/ma020313+ (2002).
Maranzano, B. J. & Wagner, N. J. Flow-small angle neutron scattering measurements of colloidal dispersion microstructure evolution through the shear thickening transition. The Journal of Chemical Physics 117, 10291–10302, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1519253 (2002).
Park, J. D., Ahn, K. H. & Lee, S. J. Structural change and dynamics of colloidal gels under oscillatory shear flow. Soft Matter 11, 9262–9272, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SM01651G (2015).
Fratzl, P., Langmayr, F. & Paris, O. Evaluation of 3D small-angle scattering from non-spherical particles in single crystals. Journal of Applied Crystallography 26, 820–826, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889893006296 (1993).
Hamley, I. W., Castelletto, V., Mykhaylyk, O. O. & Gleeson, I. Mesoscopic crystallography of shear-aligned soft materials. Journal of Applied Crystallography 37, 341–344, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889804001268 (2004).
Berret, J.-F. Rheology of Wormlike Micelles: Equilibrium Properties and Shear Banding Transitions. In Weiss, R. G. & Terech, P. (eds) Molecular Gels, 667–720 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3689-2{_}20 2006).
Gilroy, J. B. et al. Probing the structure of the crystalline core of field-aligned, monodisperse, cylindrical polyisoprene-block-polyferrocenylsilane micelles in solution using synchrotron small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering. Journal of the American Chemical Society 133, 17056–17062, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja207417z (2011).
De Geuser, F., Bley, F. & Deschamps, A. A new method for evaluating the size of plate-like precipitates by small-angle scattering. Journal of Applied Crystallography 45, 1208–1218, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889812039891 (2012).
Muthig, M., Prévost, S., Orglmeister, R. & Gradzielski, M. SASET: a program for series analysis of small-angle scattering data. Journal of Applied Crystallography 46, 1187–1195, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889813016658 (2013).
Samijo, S. K. et al. Reproducibility of shear rate and shear stress assessment by means of ultrasound in the common carotid artery of young human males and females. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 23, 583–590, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(97)00044-6 (1997).
Reneman, R. S. & Hoeks, A. P. G. Wall shear stress as measured in vivo: consequences for the design of the arterial system. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 46, 499–507, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0330-2 (2008).
Pucadyil, T. J. & Schmid, S. L. Conserved Functions of Membrane Active GTPases in Coated Vesicle Formation. Science 325, 1217–1220, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171004 (2009).
Canning, S. L., Smith, G. N. & Armes, S. P. A Critical Appraisal of RAFT-Mediated Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. Macromolecules 49, 1985–2001, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b02602 (2016).
Lim, E.-K. et al. Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges. Chemical Reviews 115, 327–394, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300213b (2015).
Cuvier, A.-S. et al. pH-triggered formation of nanoribbons from yeast-derived glycolipid biosurfactants. Soft Matter 10, 3950–3959, https://doi.org/10.1039/C4SM00111G (2014).
Agzenai, Y. et al. In Situ X-ray Polymerization: From Swollen Lamellae to Polymer–Surfactant Complexes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 118, 1159–1167, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp411894e (2014).
Fan, W., Ogura, M., Sankar, G. & Okubo, T. In situ Small-Angle and Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering Investigation on Nucleation and Crystal Growth of Nanosized Zeolite A. Chemistry of Materials 19, 1906–1917, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm062827j (2007).
Schwamberger, A. et al. Combining SAXS and DLS for simultaneous measurements and time-resolved monitoring of nanoparticle synthesis. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 343, 116–122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2014.11.049 (2015).
Schuster, J. et al. In Situ SAXS Study on a New Mechanism for Mesostructure Formation of Ordered Mesoporous Carbons: Thermally Induced Self-Assembly. Journal of the American Chemical Society 134, 11136–11145, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja208941s (2012).
Michaux, F. et al. In Situ Time-Resolved SAXS Study of the Formation of Mesostructured Organically Modified Silica through Modeling of Micelles Evolution during Surfactant-Templated Self-Assembly. Langmuir 28, 17477–17493, https://doi.org/10.1021/la3038318 (2012).
Mertens, H. D. & Svergun, D. I. Structural characterization of proteins and complexes using small-angle X-ray solution scattering. Journal of Structural Biology 172, 128–141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2010.06.012 (2010).
Glasoe, P. K. & Long, F. A. Use of glass electrodes to measure acidities in deuterium oxide. The Journal of Physical Chemistry 64, 188–190, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100830a521 (1960).
Hayward, D. W., Chiappisi, L., Prévost, S. & Schweins, R. Internal time on D11 https://doi.org/10.5291/ILL-DATA.INTER-354 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the BMBF grant 05K16KT1. The authors gratefully acknowledge the ILL for the allocated beamtime and the ILL Instrument Control Service for their support before and during the experiment. D.W.H. would also like to thank the Partnership for Soft Condensed Matter (PSCM) and in particular Peter van der Linden, Diego Pontoni and Yuri Gerelli for their helpful advice and use of the rapid prototyping facility. D.W.H. was supported by BMBF grant [05K16KT1] and L.C. acknowledges the TU-Berlin and the ILL for postdoctoral funding through a three-year cooperation agreement. The authors also acknowledge support by the German Research Foundation and the Open Access Publication Funds of Technische Universität Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.G., L.C., R.S. and D.W.H. conceived the experiments, D.W.H., L.C., S.P. and R.S. conducted the experiments, D.W.H. analysed the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hayward, D.W., Chiappisi, L., Prévost, S. et al. A Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Environment for In-Situ Observation of Chemical Processes. Sci Rep 8, 7299 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24718-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24718-z
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.