# Pulsed electromagnetic fields increase osteogenetic commitment of MSCs via the mTOR pathway in TNF-α mediated inflammatory conditions: an in-vitro study

## Abstract

Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) have been considered a potential treatment modality for fracture healing, however, the mechanism of their action remains unclear. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling may affect osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. This study aimed to assess the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) under PEMF stimulation and the potential involvement of mTOR signaling pathway in this process. PEMFs were generated by a novel miniaturized electromagnetic device. Potential changes in the expression of mTOR pathway components, including receptors, ligands and nuclear target genes, and their correlation with osteogenic markers and transcription factors were analyzed. Involvement of the mTOR pathway in osteogenesis was also studied in the presence of proinflammatory mediators. PEMF exposure increased cell proliferation and adhesion and the osteogenic commitment of MSCs even in inflammatory conditions. Osteogenic-related genes were over-expressed following PEMF treatment. Our results confirm that PEMFs contribute to activation of the mTOR pathway via upregulation of the proteins AKT, MAPP kinase, and RRAGA, suggesting that activation of the mTOR pathway is required for PEMF-stimulated osteogenic differentiation. Our findings provide insights into how PEMFs influence osteogenic differentiation in normal and inflammatory environments.

## Introduction

Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) have long been known to accelerate fracture repair1. Exposure to PEMFs has been shown to affect cell proliferation and differentiation by influencing multiple metabolic pathways, depending upon lineage and maturation stage. In the osteoblast lineage, PEMFs contribute to bone formation induced by a demineralized bone matrix and stimulate fracture healing, probably through the action of progenitors that are already committed towards bone2. Data on the mechanism of action of PEMFs and the potential involvement of specific signal transduction pathways are, however, scarce. It has been reported that PEMFs increase the activity of certain kinases belonging to known intracellular signaling pathways, such as the protein kinase A (PKA) and the MAPK ERK1/23,4, and that they modulate anti-inflammatory effects by increasing the quantity of the adenosine receptors A2A5. PEMFs stimulation also upregulates BMP2 expression in association with increased differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)6,7.

Dental implants and total joint replacements are surgical procedures that involve the implantation of permanent biomaterials. An increasing number of these procedures has been extended to younger and middle-age patients, making long-standing biocompatibility, robustness and functionality crucial requirements for these implants. Despite many recent advances, revision surgeries of the implants continue to be a major concern due to the tissue response induced by implanted biomaterials, as well as the potential for loosening and periprosthetic osteolysis which remain significant challenges8.

The basis of recent insights into osseointegration range from the pure bone healing that takes place around the implant to an immune-mediated foreign body reaction9,10,11. That reaction involves a sequence of events, including protein adsorption on the surface of the implant, activation of complement and the coagulation system, recruitment of monocyte/macrophages and MSCs, activation and differentiation of these cells into functional macrophages, osteoclasts, and osteoblasts, respectively, and the formation of biological attachments between implant and new bone11. The continued release of wear debris from the implants and the potential evolving infection during the lifespan of the implant might induce peri-implant inflammation, resulting in peri-implant osteolysis, aseptic loosening and subsequent implant failure necessitating further surgical intervention12.

Serine/threonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) has been shown to play an important role in osteoclast differentiation. It is activated by macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and its inhibition leads to decreased osteoclastogenesis13,14. Furthermore, mTOR expression levels are higher at the earlier stages of osteoclastogenesis and decrease at the later stages of osteoclast formation14. mTOR exists in cells as part of two complexes: complex 1 (mTORC1) and complex 2 (mTORC2). mTORC1 is activated by amino acids, growth factors, oxygen, inflammation, and Wnt signaling15. mTORC1 is also a negative regulator of autophagy, a lysosomal degradation process responsible for the removal of long-lived proteins and damaged organelles16,17. It has also been confirmed that the mTOR signaling pathway was involved in the regulation of apoptosis and autophagy in MSCs, and that its inhibition is able to attenuate age-related changes in MSCs18.

This study aimed to assess the potential involvement of the mTOR signaling pathway in the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs, the cells naturally involved in bone repair processes, under stimulation with PEMFs. To this end, we analyzed potential changes in the expression of mTOR signaling pathway components, including receptors, ligands and nuclear target genes, and their correlation with osteogenic markers and transcription factors. PEMFs were generated using a miniaturized electromagnetic device (MED) (Magdent Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel) that is used successfully to stimulate implant osseointegration in the clinical setting and in vivo to19. The involvement of mTOR pathway in osteogenesis was also studied in the presence of proinflammatory mediators.

## Results

### Proliferation

The biocompatibility of the surface was evaluated by MTT testing for measuring mitochondria activity as well as by evaluating cell numbers. Figure 1A displays the results of MTT testing conducted in normal conditions and in the presence of proinflammatory cytokines. Mitochondrial activity increased over time in both the control and PEMF groups. The presence of inflammatory cytokines caused a well-defined decrease in MTT values. The same pattern of increased cell proliferation was demonstrated by monitoring the cell numbers (Fig. 1B). Specifically, fewer cells were found in inflammatory conditions. Moreover, PEMF treatment was able to increase cell proliferation in both conditions. The proliferation rate was significantly higher in the PEMF group compared to the controls, even in an inflammatory environment.

### Morphology and cell adhesion properties

Morphologic analyses of MSCs were performed. Phalloidin-labeled F-actin (red), DAPI nuclear staining (blue) and overlaid fluorescent image of immunostained cellular components (merged) for the MSCs of the control and PEMF-treated groups are seen in Fig. 2. As shown in Fig. 2, the cells were able to attach to the implant surface in both the PEMF and control groups. The number of cells present on the implant surface with PEMF was clearly higher compared to the number of cells in the control group.

Cell adhesion properties were assessed by the analyses of gene expression of molecules involved on hyaluronan synthesis (HAS1), including receptor for extracellular hyaluronic acid molecules (CD44), integrin (ITGA1, 2, 3, 4), and cell adhesion molecules of the cadherine family, such as NCAM, VCAM, and PCAM (Fig. 3). The results are reported in all the graphs as an increase of gene expression value in samples of cells cultured in control conditions compared to cells exposed to PEMFs. PEMFs generated by MED were able to induce an increase in the expression of all these molecules, thereby confirming that they may enhance the adhesion properties of the cells. The presence of inflammatory stimuli (Fig. 3B) resulted in a reduction of cell adhesion, however, the presence of a PEMF significantly increased the expression of the integrin and cadherin receptors, thus potentially improving the ability of the cell to attach to the surface.

### Osteogenic process

Real-time PCR for principal osteogenic markers, such as Runx, osteopontin, osteonectin, osteocalcin, collagen type I, wnt, foxO, ALP, BMP2, and BMP7 was performed in order to evaluate the commitment of MSCs onto osteoblastic phenotypes. The cells were cultured in the presence (Fig. 4A) and in the absence of inflammatory conditions (Fig. 4B) in order to compare the variations obtained in the control group with those obtained in the PEMF group. As illustrated in Fig. 4, in all the conditions an increase in expression of all osteogenic markers was noticed, confirming that the presence of PEMF exerts a positive effect on this process even in the presence of inflammatory cytokines. This commitment was confirmed by quantified ALP activity when MSCs were cultured in both the control and PEMF groups in the presence and absence of inflammatory stimuli (Fig. 5). Additionally, PEMFs were also able to induce a positive effect on the osteogenic process. It was clear that MSCs were also able to produce higher values of ALP in the presence of inflammatory cytokines as well. There was a significant, time-dependent ALP activity for cells grown under PEMF treatment, demonstrating the promotion of the crystallization of hydroxyapatites, a typical feature of pre-osteoblastic cells.

### mTOR pathway

In order to test if PEMF is able to excerpt its osteogenic properties thought mTOR pathway we used rapamicin to verify following hypothesis:

1. (1)

rapamicin is able to reduce the osteogenic properties in absence of PEMF(control);

2. (2)

The exposure to PEMF in presence of rapamicin could restore the osteogenic commitment of MSCs.

The osteogenic properties of MSCs seeded in the osteogenic medium have been evaluated as their ability to produce a mineralized extracellular matrix by means the ARS test. Figure 6 reports the staining on implant (A); on the medium (B) and the quantification of ARS staining (C). The osteogenic potential is related to the ability to produce a mineralized matrix. Higher values of mineralization are represented by a greater values of the red staining (Fig. 6A,B). Spectroscopy was used to assess these parameters. The quantification of the osteogenic potential is reported in Fig. 6C. It is well evident that both in normal condition (passive implant) and in presence of PEMF (active implant) a decent quantity of ARS is detectable at the time frame of 7 to 14 days. When Rapamicin was added, a well-defined decline was noticed, predominantly at 14 days in passive condition. On the contrary, in presence of PEMF, Rapamicin was not able to inhibit the process and mineralization of the extracellular environment was demonstrated.

Similar phenomenon was observed at gene expression level as well. In Figs 7 and 8 we report the gene expression of markers related to mTOR pathway evaluated at 14 day on MSCs cultures seeded in osteogenic medium with rapamicin, with or without PEMF treatment (passive VS active implant). Results have been grouped in correlation to their involvement in mTOR pathway: mTOR1 Complexes; mTOR2 Complexes; mTOR Upstream Regulators - negative regulation; mTOR Upstream Regulators - positive regulation; mTOR Downstream Regulators - negative regulation; mTOR Downstream Regulators - positive regulation. The results were analyzed and are presented as the ratio between: active implant in osteogenic medium + rapamicin with the active implant in osteogenic medium without rapamicin; passive implant in osteogenic medium + rapamicin with the passive implant in osteogenic medium without rapamicin. Value comprises from −2 to +2 are related to no significant variation. All genes related to the ratio in presence of a PEMF (active implant) are from −2 to +2, indicating that no difference occurs in co-presence of rapamicine and PEMF. On the contrary in absence of PEMF defined up or dowregulation to gene related to mTOR1 involved mostly in Adipogenic commitment rather than osteogenic commitment of MSCs were demonstrated.

In order to highlight genes responsive to the PEMF stimulus we analyzed also the results related to the ratio of gene expression of active implant in presence of osteogenic medium plus rapamicin with the passive implant in osteogenic medium + rapamicine (Fig. 7).

As reported in Fig. 8, a significant difference was found in presence of PEMF and is related to:

• •Decrease in RICTOR (receptor for mTOR2)

• •Decrease in Protein phosphatase 2, regulatory subunit B, beta (PPP2R2B) involved on mTOR2 pathway

• •Decrease in PKC protein (involved on Adipogenesis)

• •Increase on VEGF (involved on angiogenesis)

• •Decrease in Upstream regulator of negative mTOR regulator:

Protein kinase, AMP-activated, beta 1 non-catalytic subunit (PRKAB1)

Protein kinase, AMP-activated, beta 2 non-catalytic subunit (PRKAB2)

Protein kinase, AMP-activated, gamma 3 non-catalytic subunit (PRKAG3)

• •Decrease in downstream stream regulator of negative mTOR regulator:

Calcium binding protein 39-like (CAB39L)

DNA-damage-inducible transcript 4 (DDIT4)

DNA-damage-inducible transcript 4-like (DDIT4L)

The results indicated that PEMFs enhance mTOR signaling by inducing an increase in the value of its related proteins, such as AKT, MAPP kinase, and RRAGA. Additionally, a significant increase in Rho family of GTPases was detected. Rho family members play crucial roles in mechanical signal transduction and promote the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts.

### Interleukin expression

MSCs were treated with PEMF in the presence of inflammatory cytokines as well as in the presence of PEMF. The results of their effect on inflammatory/anti-inflammatory activities of a PEMF are shown in Fig. 9, and they indicate that the presence of a PEMF induced a significant increase of in vitro expression of IL-10 (that exerts anti-inflammatory activity). Conversely, there was a reduction of expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, following PEMF treatment. There was no significant difference in expression of the other selected cytokines.

## Discussion

The principal results of the present study revealed several novel findings regarding the events involved in the stimulation of the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs induced by PEMFs. They identified a significant role of mTOR signaling during the differentiation driven by PEMF stimulation in an osteogenic microenvironment. Additionally, PEMFs were able to preserve the proliferation rate of MSCs in inflammatory conditions equal to that in a normal environment. MED-induced PEMF treatment resulted in an immunomodulatory effect in MSCs as expressed by increased IL-10 secretion. We found that PEMF stimulation of MSC proliferation mainly affected cell cycle regulation, cell structure, extracellular matrix, and some growth receptors involved in kinase pathways.

The osteointegration process begins with an inflammatory stage followed by the migration of MSCs. One of the major goals of dental, orthopedic and maxillofacial surgery is to achieve good and rapid osteointegration between implants and bone. The main research strategies to reduce implant failure aim at improving biomaterial characteristics, or stimulating bone endogenous repair, through a careful assessment of both processes by means of in vitro and in vivo experimental models before any application in humans. It had been reported that MED-generated PEMFs stimulated early bone formation around dental implants, already resulting in higher peri-implant bone-implant contact and bone mass after only 2 weeks, which suggests an acceleration of the osseointegration process by more than 3-fold19. However, the exact biologic mechanism of the influence of PEMFs on bone regeneration remains to be elucidated. A recent study by Ferroni et al. concluded that PEMFs affect the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs only if they are pre-committed, and that this therapy can be an appropriate candidate for the treatment of conditions requiring an acceleration of the repair process20.

We raised two major questions concerning the PEMF-related mechanism in the current study. First, we looked into the effects of PEMFs on MSCs in an inflammatory environment with regard to the ability of the cells to proliferate and adapt to the immunomodulatory changes. Understanding the mechanism of the implant’s integration, particularly the inflammatory response, is relevant for finding new treatment modalities to optimize the osteointegration and subsequent stability of the implants, which have implications in dentistry and orthopedic surgery. In this study, we added pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, which simulate the kinetics of their expression during early stages of implant integration in vivo, and investigated their effects on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs under PEMF irradiation. The proliferative capacity of MSCs is highly relevant for tissue repair21. Cytokines are known to affect proliferation of different cell types21. Therefore, we first analyzed the effect of selected cytokines on MSC proliferation. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study had assessed the influence of PEMF irradiation on the production of cytokines in MSC cultures. There are published data on the post-irradiation release of cytokines in mature osteoblasts22 and in osteoclast-like cells23. In both of those studies, ELISA was used for quantification and demonstrated an increase of TNF-a, IL-1b and PG-E2 in relation both to the recruitment of the osteoclast-like cells and to the intensity of the electrical field. The current study demonstrated the ability of MED-generated PEMFs to alter the immuno-modulative activity properties of MSCs. A significant elevation in anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10, was clearly present when MSCs were seeded on implants. IL-10 acted as an anti-inflammatory substance by inhibiting the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines, and its up-regulation in MSCs may counteract the detrimental proinflammatory effects.

The differentiations of MSCs into the osteoblastic or adipogenic lineages are inter-dependent process: molecular components promoting one cell fate inhibit the mechanisms leading the differentiation of the alternative lineage. Interestingly, inducers of differentiation along one lineage often inhibit differentiation along the other34. Our results suggest that in presence of osteogenic medium, PEMFs are able to induce osteogenic commitment of MSCs blocking the pathway of adipogenesis via mTOR related proteins.

This study reaults are in a line and comparable with a several previusly published papers. Ardeshirylajimi et al.35 investigated the the influence of prolonged pulsed extremely low frequency electromagnetic field on the osteogenic potential of cultured induced pluripotent stem cells. They concluded that combination of osteogenic medium and pulsed extremely low frequency electromagnetic field can be a great enhancement for bone differentiation of stem cells and appropriate candidate the management of bone defects and patients suffering from osteoporosis. A recently published paper by Arjmand et al.36 investigated the osteoinductive potential of PEMF in combination with Poly(caprolactone) (PCL) nanofibrous scaffold. Their results confirmed that the effects of PEMF on the osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs are very similar to these of osteogenic medium. They concluded that due to the immunological concerns regarding the application of bioactive molecules for tissue engineering, PEMF could be a good alternative for osteogenic medium. Additional recent article by Ardeshirylajimi et al.37 demonstrated that PEMF alone can induce osteogenic differentiation, but this capability was significantly increased when used in combination with electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers. In addition, simultaneous use of osteogenic medium, PEMF and electrospun nanofibers resulted in increased osteogenic differentiation potential of induced pluripotent stem cells.

This study has several limitations, including its in vitro nature. Furthermore, the cells were grown in a monolayer, which does not accurately reflect in vivo conditions. The primary human cell cultures, however, can serve as a relevant model for examining the effects of PEMFs on bone cell physiology. The modulation of bone cell proliferation markers observed in this study have implications with regard to the immediate effects of PEMFs on bone formation and healing, as well as possible long-term implications for PEMF treatment.

In summary, the findings of the present study revealed that MED-generated PEMFs stimulate osteogenic differentiation and the maturation of the adipose tissue-derived MSCs via activation of the mTOR pathways. We also demonstrated that PEMF exposure increased cell proliferation, adhesion and the osteogenic commitment of MSCs, even in inflammatory conditions. We showed that PEMFs increased the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10, and reduced the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1. MSCs provided not only cell sources for connective tissues, but also had a significant influence on the immune response. Further studies are required to investigate the precise mechanisms by which mTOR signaling pathways are influenced and to discover other potential pathways involved in the PEMF-induced osteogenic effects.

## Methods

### PEMF exposure

The miniaturized electromagnetic device (MED) (Magdent Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel) was the generator used to stimulate the cells. In the clinical setting, MED technology is used to actively stimulate osteogenesis and osseointegration. The MED was used with a Classix Dental Implant (3.3 mm 10 mm L Non Touch Prime, Cortex Ltd., Shlomi, Israel). The cells were irradiated continuously for 30 days with the MED inside the incubator and under the same conditions of temperature, humidity and CO2 concentration as non PEMF irradiated cells which served as the controls.

### Cell culture

MSCs were extracted from human adipose tissues of 5 healthy women and 5 healthy men (age 21–36 years, body mass index 30–38) who were undergoing cosmetic surgery procedures, following the guidelines of the University of Padova’s Plastic Surgery Clinic. The adipose tissues were digested with 0.075% collagenase (type 1 A; Sigma Aldrich, Italia) in a modified Krebs-Ringer buffer [125 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM Na3PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 5.5 mM glucose, and 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4)] for 60 min at 37 °C, followed by 10 min with 0.25% trypsin. Floating adipocytes were discarded, and cells from the stromal-vascular fraction were pelleted, rinsed with media, and centrifuged, after which a red cell lysis step in NH4Cl was run for 10 min at room temperature. The resulting viable cells were counted using the trypan blue exclusion assay and seeded at a density of 106 cells per cm² for in vitro expansion in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, SIGMA Aldrich Italia) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. For treatment in inflammatory conditions, the cells were treated for 24 h with 0.1 mg/mL−1 of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Celbio). TNF-α concentration used in the study is higher than in physiologic conditions. However, the aforementioned concentration was chosen based on the previously published papers in order to achieve effects in in-vitro studies38,39.

### DNA content

DNA content was determined using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to isolate total DNA from cell cultures following the manufacturer’s protocol for tissue isolation, using overnight incubation in proteinase K (Qiagen). DNA concentration was detected by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm in a spectrophotometer. The cell number was then determined from a standard curve (microgram DNA vs. cell number) generated by DNA extraction from the counted cells. The standard curve was linear over the tested range of 5–80 µg DNA (r = 0.99).

### MTT assay

To determine the proliferation rate of cell growth on titanium disks with or without treatment, a methyl thiazolyl-tetrazolium (MTT)-based cytotoxicity assay was performed according to the method of Denizot and Lang with minor modifications40. The test is based on mitochondria viability, i.e., only functional mitochondria can oxidize an MTT solution, giving a typical blue-violet endproduct. After harvesting the culture medium, the cells were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C in 1 mL 0.5 mg/mL MTT solution prepared in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution. After removal of the MTT solution by pipette, 0.5 mL 10% dimethyl sulfoxide in isopropanol (iDMSO) was added for 30 min at 37 °C. For each sample, absorbance values at 570 nm were recorded in duplicate on 200 μL aliquots deposited in 96-well plates using a multilabel plate reader (Victor 3 Perkin Elmer, Milano, Italy). All samples were examined after 15 and 30 days of culture40.

### RNA extraction and first-strand cDNA synthesis

RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen) from implants were cultured with adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells for 15 and 25 days. The RNA quality and concentration of the samples were measured using a NanoDropTM ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). For the first-strand cDNA synthesis, 200 ng of total RNA of each sample was reverse transcribed with M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer’s protocol.

### Real-time PCR

Human primers were selected for each target gene with Primer 3 software (Table 1). Real-time PCRs were carried out using the designed primers at a concentration of 300 nM and FastStart SYBR Green Master (Roche) on a Rotor-Gene 3000 (Corbett Research, Sydney, Australia). Real-time PCR was performed also according to the user’s manual for the Human mTOR signaling Profiler PCR Array (SABiosciences, Frederick, MD, USA) and using RT2 SYBR Green ROX FAST Master Mix (Qiagen). The data were analyzed using Excel-based PCR Array Data Analysis Templates (SABiosciences). The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 15 min denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s denaturation at 95 °C, annealing for 30 s at 60 °C, and 20 s elongation at 72 °C. Differences in gene expression were evaluated by the 2∆∆Ct method, using MSCs cultured in the presence and absence of inflammatory cytokines and in the presence and absence of PEMFs. Values were normalized to the expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) internal reference whose abundance did not change under our experimental conditions. Experiments were performed with 3 different cell preparations and repeated at least 3 times.

### Real-time PCR - mTOR

Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Lipid Tissue kit (Qiagen), including DNase digestion with the RNase-Free DNase. Set (Qiagen), from the mTOR signalling RT2 profiler PCR Array (gene analized are reported on Table 1). In total, 800 ng of RNA was reverse-transcribed using an RT2 First Strand kit (Qiagen). Real-time PCR was performed according to the user’s manual for the Human mTOR signalling RT2 profiler PCR Array (SABiosciences, Frederick, MD, USA) and using RT2 SYBR Green ROX FAST Master Mix (Qiagen). Thermal cycling and fluorescence detection were performed using a Rotor-Gene Q 100 (Qiagen). The data were analyzed using Excel-based PCR Array Data Analysis Templates (SABiosciences).

### Alizarin Red S staining

The extracellular mineral deposits were detected by Alizarin Red S staining. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were stained adding 40 mM freshly Alizarin Red S Solution (pH 4.2) for 10 min at room temperature with gentle shaking. Cells were washed with ddH2O, then photographed by an optical microscope. Alizarin Red S stained area were quantified from microscope images of three independent experiments using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

### ALP activity measurements

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured for up to 20 days of cell culture in order to evaluate the initial differentiation of Adipose Tissue Derived Mesenchymal Stem cells into preosteoblasts. Abcam’s alkaline phosphates kit (colorimetric) was used to detect the intracellular and extracellular ALP activities. The kit uses p-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) as a phosphatase substrate, which is adsorbed at 405 nm when dephosphorylated by ALP. In accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol, the culture medium from each sample group was collected and pooled. At the same time, the cells were washed with PBS and then homogenized with ALP assay buffer (a total of 300 μL for each group) and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 3 min to remove insoluble material. Different volumes of samples (medium and cells) were then added into 96-well plates, bringing the total volume in each well up to 80 μL with assay buffer. In addition, 80 μL fresh medium was utilized as sample background control. Thereafter, 50 μL 5mMpNPP solution was added to each well containing test samples and background control and incubated for 60 min at 25 °C while shielding the plate from light. A standard curve of 0, 4, 6, 12, 16, and 20 nmol/well was generated from 1 mM pNPP standard solution, bringing the final volume to 120 μL with assay buffer. All reactions were then stopped by adding 20 μL of stop solution into each standard and sample reaction, except the sample background control reaction. Optical density was read at 405 nm in a microplate reader (Victor). The results were normalized by subtracting the value derived from the zero standards from all standards, samples and sample background control. The pNP standard curve was plotted to identify the pNP concentration in each sample. ALP activity of the test samples was calculated as follows:

$${\rm{ALP}}\,{\rm{activity}}\,({\rm{U}}/{\rm{ml}})={\rm{A}}/{\rm{V}}/{\rm{T}}$$

where: A is the amount of pNP generated by samples (in μmol), V is the amount of sample added in the assay well (in mL), and T is the reaction time (in minutes).

### Immunofluorescence

Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min and then incubated in 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. They were then incubated with primary antibodies in 2% BSA solution in a humidified chamber for 12 h at 4 °C. The rabbit polyclonal antihuman phalloidine antibody (Millipore Corporation, MA, USA) was the primary antibody. Immunofluorescence staining was performed using the secondary antibody DyLight 549-labeled anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) diluted 1/1000 in 2% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclear staining was performed with 2 μg/mL Hoechst H33342 (Sigma-Aldrich) solution for 2 min.

### Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for data analyses. Levene’s test was used to demonstrate the equal variances of the variables. Repeated measures ANOVA with a post-hoc analysis using Bonferroni’s multiple comparison was performed. T-tests were used to determine significant differences (p < 0.05). Repeatability was calculated as the standard deviation of the difference between measurements. All testing was performed using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) (license of the University of Padua, Italy).

## References

1. 1.

Fu, Y. C. et al. A novel single pulsed electromagnetic field stimulates osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and bone repair. PLoS One 9, e91581, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091581 (2014).

2. 2.

Petecchia, L. et al. Electro-magnetic field promotes osteogenic differentiation of BM-hMSCs through a selective action on Ca(2+)-related mechanisms. Sci Rep 5, 13856, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13856 (2015).

3. 3.

Song, M. et al. The effect of electromagnetic fields on the proliferation and the osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells modulated by dexamethasone. Bioelectromagnetics 35, 479–490, https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21867 (2014).

4. 4.

Yong, Y., Ming, Z. D., Feng, L., Chun, Z. W. & Hua, W. Electromagnetic fields promote osteogenesis of rat mesenchymal stem cells through the PKA and ERK1/2 pathways. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 10, E537–E545, https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1864 (2016).

5. 5.

Ongaro, A. et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulate osteogenic differentiation in human bone marrow and adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells. Bioelectromagnetics 35, 426–436, https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21862 (2014).

6. 6.

Kim, M. O., Jung, H., Kim, S. C., Park, J. K. & Seo, Y. K. Electromagnetic fields and nanomagnetic particles increase the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Med 35, 153–160, https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2014.1978 (2015).

7. 7.

Lin, C. C., Lin, R. W., Chang, C. W., Wang, G. J. & Lai, K. A. Single-pulsed electromagnetic field therapy increases osteogenic differentiation through Wnt signaling pathway and sclerostin downregulation. Bioelectromagnetics 36, 494–505, https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21933 (2015).

8. 8.

Purdue, P. E., Koulouvaris, P., Nestor, B. J. & Sculco, T. P. The central role of wear debris in periprosthetic osteolysis. HSS J 2, 102–113, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-006-9003-6 (2006).

9. 9.

Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A. & Chang, D. T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 20, 86–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 (2008).

10. 10.

Branemark, R., Branemark, P. I., Rydevik, B. & Myers, R. R. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev 38, 175–181 (2001).

11. 11.

Trindade, R., Albrektsson, T., Tengvall, P. & Wennerberg, A. Foreign Body Reaction to Biomaterials: On Mechanisms for Buildup and Breakdown of Osseointegration. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 18, 192–203, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12274 (2016).

12. 12.

Sundfeldt, M., Carlsson, L. V., Johansson, C. B., Thomsen, P. & Gretzer, C. Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories. Acta Orthop 77, 177–197, https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610045902 (2006).

13. 13.

Glantschnig, H., Fisher, J. E., Wesolowski, G., Rodan, G. A. & Reszka, A. A. M-CSF, TNFalpha and RANK ligand promote osteoclast survival by signaling through mTOR/S6 kinase. Cell Death Differ 10, 1165–1177, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401285 (2003).

14. 14.

Indo, Y. et al. Metabolic regulation of osteoclast differentiation and function. J Bone Miner Res 28, 2392–2399, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1976 (2013).

15. 15.

Laplante, M. & Sabatini, D. M. Regulation of mTORC1 and its impact on gene expression at a glance. J Cell Sci 126, 1713–1719, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.125773 (2013).

16. 16.

Klionsky, D. J. et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy 8, 445–544 (2012).

17. 17.

Mizushima, N. & Komatsu, M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell 147, 728–741, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.026 (2011).

18. 18.

Gharibi, B., Farzadi, S., Ghuman, M. & Hughes, F. J. Inhibition of Akt/mTOR attenuates age-related changes in mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 32, 2256–2266, https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1709 (2014).

19. 19.

Barak, S. et al. A new device for improving dental implants anchorage: a histological and micro-computed tomography study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 27, 935–942, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12661 (2016).

20. 20.

Ferroni, L. et al. Pulsed magnetic therapy increases osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells only if they are pre-committed. Life Sci 152, 44–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2016.03.020 (2016).

21. 21.

Deshpande, S. et al. Reconciling the effects of inflammatory cytokines on mesenchymal cell osteogenic differentiation. J Surg Res 185, 278–285, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.063 (2013).

22. 22.

Li, J. K., Lin, J. C., Liu, H. C. & Chang, W. H. Cytokine release from osteoblasts in response to different intensities of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. Electromagn Biol Med 26, 153–165, https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370701572837 (2007).

23. 23.

Chang, K., Chang, W. H., Wu, M. L. & Shih, C. Effects of different intensities of extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields on formation of osteoclast-like cells. Bioelectromagnetics 24, 431–439, https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10118 (2003).

24. 24.

Xian, L. et al. Matrix IGF-1 maintains bone mass by activation of mTOR in mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Med 18, 1095–1101, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2793 (2012).

25. 25.

Sarbassov, D. D. et al. Prolonged rapamycin treatment inhibits mTORC2 assembly and Akt/PKB. Mol Cell 22, 159–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.03.029 (2006).

26. 26.

Martin, S. K. et al. Brief report: the differential roles of mTORC1 and mTORC2 in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells 33, 1359–1365, https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1931 (2015).

27. 27.

Xiang, X., Zhao, J., Xu, G., Li, Y. & Zhang, W. mTOR and the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 43, 501–510, https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmr041 (2011).

28. 28.

Aguiari, P. et al. High glucose induces adipogenic differentiation of muscle-derived stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 1226–1231, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711402105 (2008).

29. 29.

Pavan, C. et al. Weight gain related to treatment with atypical antipsychotics is due to activation of PKC-beta. Pharmacogenomics J 10, 408–417, https://doi.org/10.1038/tpj.2009.67 (2010).

30. 30.

Pinton, P., Pavan, C. & Zavan, B. PKC-beta activation and pharmacologically induced weight gain during antipsychotic treatment. Pharmacogenomics 12, 453–455, https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.11.25 (2011).

31. 31.

Rimessi, A. et al. Protein Kinase C beta: a New Target Therapy to Prevent the Long-Term Atypical Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain. Neuropsychopharmacology 42, 1491–1501, https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2017.20 (2017).

32. 32.

Ferroni, L. et al. Treatment by Therapeutic Magnetic Resonance (TMR) increases fibroblastic activity and keratinocyte differentiation in an in vitro model of 3D artificial skin. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 11, 1332–1342, https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2031 (2017).

33. 33.

Ferroni, L. et al. Treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with Therapeutic Magnetic Resonance (TMR(R)) improves the quality of granulation tissue. Eur J Histochem 61, 2800, https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2017.2800 (2017).

34. 34.

Chen, Q. et al. Fate decision of mesenchymal stem cells: adipocytes or osteoblasts? Cell Death Differ 23, 1128–1139, https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2015.168 (2016).

35. 35.

Ardeshirylajimi, A. & Soleimani, M. Enhanced growth and osteogenic differentiation of Induced Pluripotent Stem cells by Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 61, 36–41 (2015).

36. 36.

Arjmand, M., Ardeshirylajimi, A., Maghsoudi, H. & Azadian, E. Osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells cultured on nanofibrous scaffold improved in the presence of pulsed electromagnetic field. J Cell Physiol 233, 1061–1070, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25962 (2018).

37. 37.

Ardeshirylajimi, A. & Khojasteh, A. Synergism of Electrospun Nanofibers and Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Osteogenic Differentiation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. ASAIO J 64, 253–260, https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000631 (2018).

38. 38.

Bonora, M. et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha impairs oligodendroglial differentiation through a mitochondria-dependent process. Cell Death Differ 21, 1198–1208, https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2014.35 (2014).

39. 39.

Brun, P. et al. In vitro response of osteoarthritic chondrocytes and fibroblast-like synoviocytes to a 500-730 kDa hyaluronan amide derivative. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100, 2073–2081, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32771 (2012).

40. 40.

Denizot, F. & Lang, R. Rapid colorimetric assay for cell growth and survival. Modifications to the tetrazolium dye procedure giving improved sensitivity and reliability. J Immunol Methods 89, 271–277 (1986).

## Acknowledgements

Research support (including PEMF generting devices and partial support in lab supplies) was provided by Mgdent Ltd.

## Author information

B.Z., A.P. and H.A.B. conceived and designed the experiments; L.F., O.D. and C.G. performed the experiments; B.Z., S.B. and C.G. analyzed the data; B.Z. and H.A.B. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; B.Z., L.F., M.S. and O.D. wrote the paper.

Correspondence to Oleg Dolkart.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

O.D.- payed consultant of the Magdent ltd. Company. S.B.- Co-founder of Magdent ltd.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Ferroni, L., Gardin, C., Dolkart, O. et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields increase osteogenetic commitment of MSCs via the mTOR pathway in TNF-α mediated inflammatory conditions: an in-vitro study. Sci Rep 8, 5108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23499-9

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using 3D Magnetic Scaffolds

• Alyaa I. Aldebs
• , Fatema T. Zohora
• , Nasim Nosoudi
• , Surinder P. Singh
•  & Jaime E. Ramirez‐Vick

Bioelectromagnetics (2020)

• ### Pulsed electromagnetic fields: promising treatment for osteoporosis

• T. Wang
• , L. Yang
• , J. Jiang
• , Y. Liu
• , Z. Fan
• , C. Zhong
•  & C. He

Osteoporosis International (2019)

• ### Effects of Electromagnetic Field on Proliferation, Differentiation, and Mineralization of MC3T3 Cells

• Luvita Suryani
• , Jian Hui Too
• , Ammar Mansoor Hassanbhai
• , Feng Wen
• , Daryl Jimian Lin
• , Na Yu
•  & Swee-Hin Teoh

Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods (2019)

• ### Presence of ROS in Inflammatory Environment of Peri-Implantitis Tissue: In Vitro and In Vivo Human Evidence

• Eitan Mijiritsky
• , Letizia Ferroni
• , Chiara Gardin
• , Oren Peleg
• , Alper Gultekin
• , Alper Saglanmak
• , Lucia Gemma Delogu
• , Dinko Mitrecic
• , Marco Tatullo
•  & Barbara Zavan

Journal of Clinical Medicine (2019)

• ### Metal Nanoparticles Released from Dental Implant Surfaces: Potential Contribution to Chronic Inflammation and Peri-Implant Bone Loss

• Eriberto Bressan
• , Letizia Ferroni
• , Chiara Gardin
• , Gloria Bellin
• , Luca Sbricoli
• , Stefano Sivolella
• , Giulia Brunello