Unraveling the efficiency-limiting morphological issues of the perylene diimide-based non-fullerene organic solar cells


Herein we report a comparative morphological analysis of the perylene diimide (PDI)- and fullerene-based organic solar cells (OSCs) to identify the factors responsible for low performance of PDI-based devices. A PDI derivative, bis-PDI, and a fullerene derivative, PC70BM, are mixed with an efficient polymer donor, PffBT4T-2OD. The large disparity in power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of OSCs composed of PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI (PCE = 5.18%) and PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM (PCE = 10.19%) observed are attributed to differences in the nanostructural motif of bulk heterojunction (BHJ) morphologies of these blend systems. The X-ray scattering and surface energy characterizations revealed that the structurally dissimilar bis-PDI and PC70BM molecules determine the variation in blend film morphologies, and in particular, the molecular packing features of the donor PffBT4T-2OD polymer. In addition, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images explore the BHJ morphologies and presence of longer polymer fibrils in PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI system, justifying the unbalanced charge transport and high hole mobility. The low performance of PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI devices was further investigated by studying charge carrier recombination dynamics by using light-intensity-dependent and transient photovoltage (TPV) experiments. Furthermore, the temperature-dependent experiments showed the photovoltaic properties, including charge recombination losses, are strongly affected by energetic disorder present in bis-PDI-based system.


Bulk heterojunction (BHJ) OSCs are being extensively researched as a clean energy source with efficiencies exceeding 10%1,2,3,4,5. In most of the high-efficiency BHJ-OSCs, the fullerene derivative PC70BM is a common constituent, which is used as an electron accepting material in the photoactive layer. Despite the beneficial properties of fullerenes in the context of BHJ-OSCs, they are limited in (i) spectral bandwidth, (ii) ambient stability, (iii) tunability of electronic properties, and (iv) relatively high cost. For these reasons, it is not clear whether fullerene derivatives are ultimately the best candidate materials for use as OSC acceptors. Several research groups have focused on the development of non-fullerene small molecule acceptors. To date, numerous small molecule non-fullerene acceptors have been designed and found to provide PCEs that are comparable to those achieved using fullerene derivatives4,6,7,8. One class of non-fullerene electron accepting materials is low-cost PDI derivatives7,9,10,11,12,13. The BHJ photoactive layer made with PDIs offers a high absorption coefficient in the visible region, good photochemical stability, and good thin film forming properties7,9,14,15. Despite their attractive features, PDI-based acceptors have met with little success, and few PDI systems have shown PCEs just over 8%16,17. One of the reason for having lower PCEs is poor charge carrier transport properties in BHJ blend films, which is mainly depend on the molecular interconnectivity, packing and orientation in blend films.

The bulk characteristics of the photoactive layer of BHJ OSCs depend on the formation of nonbonding intermolecular interactions that facilitate the formation of specific molecular orders, packing structures, and morphologies in the solid state. Unfortunately, in polymer donor:monomeric-PDI acceptor based systems, large-scale phase separation induced by strong molecular aggregation among monomeric PDIs can seriously limit excimers7 dissociation and charge transport18,19. The molecular aggregation among PDIs was recently ameliorated through the design of twisted and three-dimensional (3D) structured PDI molecules, but still, there are few factors that are limiting the PCEs of the PDI based OSCs as compared to fullerene-based OSCs20,21,22,23,24. Therefore, a thorough comparative analysis of the molecular structures of small molecule acceptors and their solid-state properties is necessary for further development of PDI-based acceptors.

In this work, we have studied the morphological and photovoltaic properties of a PDI derivative (bis-PDI) and compared with well-known fullerene-based acceptor (PC70BM), combined with donor polymer, poly[(5,6-difluoro-2,1,3-benzothiadiazol-4,7-diyl)-alt-(3,3′′′-di(2-octyldodecyl)-2,2′;5′,2″;5″,2′′′-quaterthiophen-5,5′′′-diyl)] (PffBT4T-2OD). UV-vis absorption and photoluminescence (PL) studies were conducted to characterize the photon harvesting and excited state dissociation parameters. Atomic force microscopy (AFM), HRTEM, grazing incidence wide angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS), and contact angle measurements were employed to monitor the differences in the film morphologies. TPV study, photocurrent-effective voltage analysis, and low temperature-dependent characterizations were performed to elucidate the factors that determined the differences among device performances.

Results and Discussion

The chemical structures and energy levels (HOMO and LUMO) of PffBT4T-2OD, PC70BM, and bis-PDI are shown in Fig. 1a,b. PffBT4T-2OD is a crystalline polymeric donor with a broad absorption spectrum in visible region, and OSC devices reported with fullerene acceptors exhibited PCE of 10.8%, one of the highest PCE values recorded for single OSC25. The bis-PDI small molecule was synthesized by a modified procedure as described in the supporting information, and used as an acceptor material because of its strong light absorption in visible region (420–600 nm), good electron mobility, and favorable energy level matching with PffBT4T-2OD donor polymer. Figure 1c presents the UV-vis absorption spectra of the pristine (bis-PDI, PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD) and blend (PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI) films, where both blend films exhibit good light harvesting in the visible region (400–780 nm). In addition, PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI blend film shows a weak absorption near-UV region (300–420 nm), this difference might be attributed to weak absorption of bis-PDIs in this region.

Figure 1

(a) Chemical structures of PffBT4T-2OD polymer, PC70BM and bis-PDI small molecules, (b) energy level diagram of the inverted device structure with active materials used, (c) normalized UV-vis absorption spectra for the PffBT4T-2OD polymer, PC70BM, bis-PDI, PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI thin films.

Solar cell device performance

BHJ OSCs were fabricated with device structure of glass/indium tin oxide (ITO)/zinc oxide (ZnO)/donor:acceptor/vanadium oxide (V2O5)/Ag, and current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the optimized PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI OSCs are shown in Fig. 2a. The optimal device performance of the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI system was achieved using a 1:1.5 (wt:wt) ratio and of the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM system using a 1:1.2 (wt:wt) ratio (Table 1 and S1)25. The PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM OSCs exhibited a maximum PCE of 10.19%, with a VOC of 0.76 V, a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 16.82 mA cm−2, and a fill factor (FF) of 76.4%, whereas the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI solar cell showed a PCE of 5.18%, a VOC of 0.85 V, a JSC of 11.22 mA cm−2, and a FF of 52.6% with DIO (w/DIO). The high value of VOC for PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI OSC is assigned to the high LUMO energy level of the bis-PDI acceptor26.

Figure 2

(a) J-V curves and (b) EQE spectra of PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI based BHJ OSCs.

Table 1 Photovoltaic properties of the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM, PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI OSCs under standard AM1.5 G illumination. The averages are from over eight devices.

The external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra of the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI devices were recorded over a broad range 300–800 nm (Fig. 2b), which is corresponding well to the absorption spectra of the respective films (Fig. 1c and Figure S2a). The maximum EQE values of the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI (50.1%) and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI w/DIO (58.3%) devices are significantly lower than those of the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM (69.8%) and PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM w/DIO (79.6%) devices, measured at 455 nm. The large difference in EQE values between bis-PDI- and PC70BM-based devices is well matched to the JSC values. The JSC values calculated from the EQE spectra are in a good agreement with experimental JSC in the direct J-V measurements (Table S2).

The OSC devices were further set to characterize the effective exciton dissociation into free charge carriers in bis-PDI- and PC70BM-based devices. For this, we have studied the relationship between the photocurrent (Jph) and the effective voltage (Veff) (Figure S2b), Jph = JL − JD, where JL is the current density under illumination and JD is the current density under dark conditions27. At a high reverse biased voltage, Jph values are saturated in all solar cells. The saturation current density (Jsat) and charge dissociation probability (Pdiss = Jph/Jsat) were determined for all devices. The calculated Pdiss values under short-circuit condition are 84.6% for PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM, 73.6% for PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI, 91.8% for PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM w/DIO, and 74.1% for PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI w/DIO, respectively. The higher values of Pdiss obtained from the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM compared to PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI suggest an efficient dissociation of excitons into free charge carriers and better collection of free charge carriers at electrodes27.

Film morphology and photoluminescence quenching

The morphologies of the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI blend films were characterized by HRTEM (Fig. 3a,b,d,e). All the TEM images of PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI films have showed a nanofibrillar structures kind of BHJ morphology. These fibrils arise from the highly crystalline features of the PffBT4T-2OD polymer28, which was also confirmed in GIWAXS experiments (discussed later in this section). In Fig. 3, TEM images depicted that components in PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI film are closely packed, and are contained longer fibrils when compare to the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM blend film where fibrils appear smaller and farther apart. We assume that these differences arose due to the distinct structure and aggregation properties of PC70BM and bis-PDI molecules. The slightly coarser morphology in PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI blend film reflects in a smaller PL quenching efficiency of polymer PL spectrum (Fig. 3c,f)29. The higher value of PL quenching for PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM (93.2%) indicates a better exciton dissociation at the donor/acceptor interface than in the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI (79.9%). The addition of the DIO additive further improved the PL quenching efficiency significantly to 95.6% for PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and 83.1% for PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI due to the effect of DIO on the organization of the PffBT4T-2OD polymer30. We have also investigated the PL quenching efficiency of bis-PDI (excited at 532 nm), revealing almost complete quenching in the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI blend films (Figure S3). The complete quenching of bis-PDI excimers implies that bis-PDI is relatively close to the polymer or bis-PDI domain sizes lying well within the excimer diffusion length, so bis-PDI excimers could reach a heterojunction before emitting31,32. The AFM images of these two systems are showed in Figure S4. The surface roughness values of the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM blend system decreased w/DIO treatment from 1.8 nm to 1.1 nm, whereas surface roughness of the PffBT4T-2OD: bis-PDI film increased from 1.9 nm to 2.8 nm.

Figure 3

TEM images of (a) PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and (b) PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM w/DIO, and (d) PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI and (e) PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI w/DIO. Figure (c) and (f) are the corresponding PL quenching spectra for the blend films with respect to PffBT4T-2OD polymer film, where all films were excited at 632 nm wavelength and PL spectra corrected for the absorption of the films at the wavelength of excitation.

The differences in blend morphologies of two systems might have arisen due to the different surface energies of the components. Therefore, the surface energies of the pristine films were evaluated by measuring the contact angles formed between the film and either of two different liquids (deionized (DI) water and ethylene glycol (EG)) (Figure S5). Later, contact angles were used in the Owens and Wendt geometric mean equation to calculate the surface energies (Table S3)33. The relatively large difference in surface energies of the PffBT4T-2OD (γ = 29.1 mN m−1) and the bis-PDI (γ = 41.1 mN m−1) is likely to result in a poor miscibility in the blend film, producing a slightly larger phase-separated film morphology. Whereas in the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM blend film, the spherical shape fullerene molecule and small difference in surface energies of the components enabled the PC70BM (γ = 31.6 mN m−1) molecule to easily penetrate and diffuse into the polymer region, which may have hindered strong aggregation of polymer34,35. However, the bis-PDI molecule could not penetrate into the polymer region because of large surface energy difference, and allow polymer to crystallize largely, as can be seen in TEM images. The high surface energy of the bis-PDI film may be because of more nitrogen and oxygen atoms in molecular structure compared to PC70BM36.

The crystalline properties of the PC70BM and bis-PDI acceptors in the presence of the PffBT4T-2OD polymer were investigated using GIWAXS experiments (Figures S6, S7). The information extracted from the in-plane and out-of-plane of GIWAXS images are presented in Fig. 4 and summarized in Table S4. In the 2D-XRD images, both blend films exhibit distinctive diffraction peaks, as evidenced by the strong lamellar stacking with (100), (200), and (300) diffraction peaks, as well as the distinct (010) diffraction peak present in the out-of-plane direction, which indicated the presence of a preferential face-on orientation of PffBT4T-2OD polymer domains. In Figure S6a, three isotropic diffraction rings at q = 0.63 Å−1, 1.28 Å−1, and 1.90 Å−1 represent the amorphous behavior of the PC70BM with randomly oriented molecules37. On the other hand in Figure S6b, the pristine bis-PDI film showed a stronger (100) diffraction peak in the out-of-plane profile and a peak near 1.5 Å−1, which corresponds to the π-π stacking interactions, is more distinctive in the in-plane direction. These features of the in-plane and out-of-plane profiles of the bis-PDI film suggested that the preferred molecular orientation was weakly edge-on. In Figures S7a,c, the broad peaks at q = 1.3 Å−1 are the characteristic of PC70BM aggregation38 and a weak peak near q = 1.42 Å−1 represents bis-PDI aggregation. To understand the impact of two structurally different small molecules (bis-PDI and PC70BM) on the polymer chain packing, we have analyzed the coherence length for polymer peak (200) in both the blend systems. The coherence lengths for the (200) diffraction peak in the in-plane direction and the (010) diffraction peak in the out-of-plane direction were calculated for all blend systems using the Scherrer equation39. The coherence length in the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI (15.6 nm) was much larger than that in the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70PM (11.8 nm), suggesting that the PffBT4T-2OD polymer formed larger crystals when mixed with bis-PDI than with PC70BM. Moreover, the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI films prepared with DIO formed larger π-π stacked crystals (5.0 nm) oriented in the out-of-plane direction than were formed in the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70PM blend film (4.3 nm). Here, we speculate that the planar molecular structure of bis-PDI would form π-π interactions with PffBT4T-2OD, thereby favoring the crystallization of polymer molecules with a face-on orientation, in contrast with the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM blend film.

Figure 4

(a) In-plane and (b) out-of-plane scan for the blend films of PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM, PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM w/DIO, PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI w/DIO.

Charge transport properties

The electron and hole mobilities of the two blend systems were evaluated using the space charge limited current (SCLC) method18 with controlled device structures: ITO/ZnO/donor:acceptor/Ca/Al for electron-only and ITO/PEDOT:PSS/donor:acceptor/Au for hole-only devices (Table 1, Figure S8)18. The PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM device has shown a better electron mobility (μe = 6.4 × 10−4 cm2 V−1s−1) as compared to the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI system (μe = 2.52 × 10−6 cm2 V−1s−1), whereas the hole mobility of the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI system (μh = 3.04 × 10−4 cm2 V−1s−1) is 2.8 times higher to the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM system (μh = 1.09 × 10−4 cm2 V−1s−1). The ratio of μe/μh for the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM is much closer to 1, indicating good balance of charge transport in the devices. The balanced and high mobility values obtained from PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM explained, in part, the higher values of FF and PCE obtained from OSC devices.

Charge carrier recombination dynamics

In order to gain insight into the charge carrier recombination dynamics in both type of OSCs, we varied light intensity during the measurement of J-V characteristics and the results are shown in Fig. 5a. A plot of JSC versus the light intensity (I) on a log-log scale provides a good comparison of the non-geminated bimolecular recombination losses at 0 V, where I was varied over the range 17–100 mW cm−2 40. The experimental data points showed in Fig. 5a were fitted to a power law41 \({J}_{SC}\propto {I}^{\alpha }\) as a linear fit on the logarithmic scale. The linear fits provided the exponents α = 0.99 for the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM, α = 1.00 for the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM w/DIO, α = 0.92 for the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI and α = 0.96 for the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI w/DIO systems. A stronger deviation of α from 1 for the bis-PDI-based OSCs indicates that JSC for these devices is limited by bimolecular recombination losses40, however such deviation in α could also be assign to space charge limited effects42,43 or to inefficient charge extraction caused by an improper choice of charge carrier-collecting electrodes44,45.

Figure 5

(a) Light intensity (I) dependence current density (JSC) and (b) charge carrier lifetime (τ) versus charge carrier density (n) for PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI based OSCs. Scattered points represent experimental data points, while the dashed and solid lines demonstrate the fitting according to the equations \({J}_{SC}\propto {I}^{\alpha }\) in (a) and \(\tau {(}{n}{)}{=}{\tau }_{{0}}{{n}}^{{-}\lambda }\) in (b), respectively41,48.

The difference in charge carrier recombination dynamics of the fullerene and bis-PDI-based OSCs is quantified by measuring the TPV and transient photocurrent (TPC). The charge carrier lifetime (\(\tau \)) and carrier density (n) were estimated from the TPV and TPC data as described earlier46,47. The carrier density versus carrier lifetime is plotted in Fig. 5b and fitted to a power law equation \(\tau (n)={\tau }_{0}{n}^{-\lambda }\), where τ0 is the intercept at n = 0, and λ is the magnitude of the slope, which is related to the order of the non-geminated recombination (λ + 1)48. For similar values of n = 1.15 × 1018 cm−3, the charge carrier lifetime in PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM is double to that in the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI device, indicating a much slower recombination rate in the fullerene-based OSCs. Further, the carrier lifetime of the devices increased with the use of the additive, consistent with the improved device performance. The slope λ extracted 1.26 for PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM, 1.02 for PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM w/DIO, 2.05 for PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI, and 1.63 for PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI w/DIO suggesting that the bis-PDI-based devices severely affected by the non-geminated trap-assisted recombination, whereas the fullerene-based devices are nearly independent of trap-assisted recombination48. We expect unbalanced charge carrier transport and largely phase-separated morphology in PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI system are the main reasons for having high trap-assisted recombination. To understand the role of the charge carrier transport and the morphology of the blend systems on recombination dynamics, we have performed temperature-dependent SCLC mobility and J-V measurements under different sunlight intensities.

Temperature-dependent measurements

Temperature-dependent SCLC charge carrier mobilities were determined from dark J-V characteristics measured at various temperatures between 150–310 K. Figure 6a shows the electron and hole mobility values of the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI systems as a function of the inverse square of the temperature, T−2. The curves show a fit to the equation \(\mu ={\mu }_{\infty }{e}^{{(-{T}_{0}/T)}^{2}}\), where \({\mu }_{\infty }\) is the mobility at infinite temperature and T0 is the characteristic temperature49. The slope of the fitted line is related to the width of the density of states through equation \(\sigma =\frac{3}{2}{k}_{B}{T}_{0}\), where k B indicates the Boltzmann constant and derived values of σ are listed in Table S5. The energetic disorder parameter σe for electron transport in PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM (74.6 meV) is smaller than that in PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI (81.5 meV), supporting a higher electron mobility in the PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM blend system. Also, the large difference in σh values for PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM (62.0 meV) and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI (38.8 meV) explains the difference in hole mobility values of the two systems. It seems evident that the values of σh strongly depends on the PffBT4T-2OD polymer domains in two blend systems. The large difference in device performance might arise from the differences in the energetic disorder and, as a result, slower charge carriers start accumulating in the photoactive layer and increase the recombination losses50.

Figure 6

(a) Electron and hole mobility versus 1/T2 plot fitted according to the Gaussian disorder model50 (b) α and β parameters plotted with different temperatures for PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM and PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI based devices. In Figure (b), α and β parameters are extracted from temperature- and intensity-dependent J-V characteristics in supporting information (Figures S9, S10) and the solid line is a guideline for the eyes.

To understand the effect of energetic disorder directly on the non-geminated bimolecular and trap-assisted recombinations, we measured intensity-dependent JSC and VOC at various low temperatures 150 K, 200 K, 250 K and 300 K (Figures S9 and S10). In supporting information, the intensity-dependent JSC data was fitted with power law and the α values were extracted in similar method as described above. The exponent α decreased from 0.99 to 0.94 (PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM), 1 to 0.98 (PffBT4T-2OD:PC70BM w/DIO), 0.91 to 0.79 (PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI), and 0.96 to 0.86 (PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI w/DIO) as the measuring temperature decreased (Fig. 6b). The decrease in α could be explained in terms of slow charge extraction at a reduced mobility, which increase the availability of free charge carriers to recombine50. The faster rate of α decay with decreasing temperature suggests a higher-order bimolecular recombination losses in the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI system. The intensity-dependent VOC was fitted to equation VOCβ(kBT/e)ln(I)41, where T is the absolute temperature, and e is the electron charge (Figure S10). The extent of trap assisted recombination can be estimated by extracting the β values40. β = 1 implies no trap-assisted recombination, whereas β > 1 indicates that trap-assisted recombination is dominating mechanism. The higher values of β, and the faster rate of increase in β values with decreasing temperature obtained for the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI devices suggest that the devices are strongly limited by the trap-assisted recombination in energetically localized states. The increase in β with decreasing temperature is expected because of the stronger occupation of deeply localized states (traps), as the charge carriers no longer had access to the thermal energy needed to escape from the trap states51.


In conclusion, we have performed a comprehensive comparative analysis for elucidating the key morphological issues that are responsible for low performance of bis-PDI-based OSCs. We observed that the morphological differences in blend films, that determined the device performance, are arisen due to the distinct miscibility of PC70BM and bis-PDI molecules with PffBT4T-2OD polymer. GIWAX, TEM and AFM studies revealed the strongly face-on oriented PffBT4T-2OD polymer forms a well-mixed interconnected BHJ morphology with amorphous PC70BM instead of weakly edge-on oriented bis-PDI molecule. In addition, the large coherence length in the PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI suggested that bis-PDI molecule favoring the crystallization of PffBT4T-2OD polymer molecules. However, the lower values of JSC and FF in PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI are primarily attributed to the weak absorption in near-UV region, inefficient charge generation, low electron mobility and unbalanced charge carrier transport. The relevance of unbalanced charge transports in PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI devices was supported by their large differences in the energetic disorder associated with electron and hole transports. Further, low-temperature light-intensity dependent study on devices confirmed the dominance of trap-assisted recombination in PffBT4T-2OD:bis-PDI devices.



PffBT4T-2OD and PC70BM were purchased from Solarmer Energy Inc., and were used as received. The bis-PDI small molecule was synthesized according to the published procedure52. A ZnO precursor solution was prepared by dissolving 1 g zinc acetate dihydrate (99.999% trace metals basis, Aldrich) in 10 mL 2-methoxyethanol (99.8%, anhydrous, Aldrich) with 0.28 g ethanolamine (≥99.5%, Aldrich) as a surfactant, followed by stirring overnight under ambient conditions53.

Characterization of the Materials

The bis-PDI and other intermediate were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). The LUMO levels of bis-PDI and PC70BM were calculated from cyclic voltammetry measurements. The UV-Vis absorption and PL spectra of the spin-coated films were recorded using a Perkin Elmer, Lambda 1050 spectrometer with a Horiba Jobin Yvon NanoLog spectrofluorimeter, respectively.

Preparation of the solar cells

The inverted structure of the OSC devices was prepared with the structure: stack glass/ITO (110 nm)/ZnO (40 nm)/donor:acceptor/V2O5 (2 nm)/Ag (100 nm). ITO-coated glass substrates were cleaned by sequential sonications in detergent, distilled water, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol for 15 minutes at each step. After UV/ozone treatment for 30 minutes, a ZnO electron transport layer7 was prepared by spin-coating at 4000 rpm and then baking at 120 °C for 30 minutes on the hot plate under ambient conditions. The photoactive layer solutions were prepared in CB (polymer concentration: 9 mg mL−1) and were heated on a hotplate at 110 °C for 8 hours with stirring. The photoactive layers were spin-coated from the warm solution onto the prepared glass/ITO/ZnO substrate in a N2-filled glovebox. The films were then annealed at 100 °C for 5 minutes. The electrodes were deposited by transferring the samples into a vacuum chamber. V2O5 (2 nm)/Ag (100 nm) was then thermally deposited on top of the photoactive layer with the help of a shadow mask having a 0.0555 cm2 device area.

Characterization of the solar cells

The electrical characteristics were measured using a Keithley 4200 unit under 100 mW cm−2 AM1.5 solar illumination in a N2-filled glove box. The light was generated using an Oriel 1-kW solar simulator referenced using a Reference Cell PVM 132 calibrated at the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory. The external quantum efficiency was measured using a photomodulation spectroscopy setup (Merlin, Oriel) with monochromatic light from a Xenon lamp. The power density of the monochromatic light was calibrated using a Si photodiode certified by the National Institute for Standards and Technology. Light intensity-dependent J-V curves were measured using the same solar simulator setup by varying the intensity from 0.17–1 sun.

Preparation of the control devices and their characterization

The hole- and electron-only control devices were prepared with the device structure ITO/PEDOT:PSS/donor:acceptor/Au and ITO/ZnO/donor:acceptor/Ca/Al, respectively. The electrical characteristics were measured using the Keithley 4200 in a N2-filled glove box. The mobility values were extracted from the dark J-V characteristics of the devices by fitting to the Mott-Gurney equation18.

Morphological characterization

AFM and TEM images are obtained using a MultiMode 8 Scanning Probe Microscope from VEECO Instruments Inc. and a JEOL JEM-2200FS (with an Image Cs-corrector, bright field mode), respectively. TEM samples were prepared on water soluble sacrificial substrates (glass/ITO/PEDOT:PSS) and floated onto the surface of DI water before being transferred on 200 mesh copper grids for top-down imaging. GIWAXS analysis was performed using Beamline 3 C at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL). The photon energy was 10.6408 keV (λ = 1.1651 Å). The beam size was adjusted to 0.8 mm × 0.8 mm in width and height, respectively. Rayonix MAR165 detector was used for data collection. The thin film samples were prepared on silicon wafer and deposited in the same way as when making the solar cell devices. The angle between the film surface and the incident beam was fixed at 0.12° for all of the samples. The GIWAXS images shown are normalized with respect to exposure time. The contact angle measurements were carried out under atmospheric conditions using SEO330A (Surface and Electro-Optics).

Charge carrier dynamics

TPV and TPC were measured using a TDC3054C digital oscilloscope connected to high-speed reamplifiers: SR560 and DHPCA-100. The samples were excited by a 3 ns pulsed laser at 532 nm (OBB, NL4300, and OD401) under AM1.5 G illumination at an intensity of 0.3–1 sun.

Low-temperature measurements

Low-temperature measurements were conducted by supporting the devices using a standard sample holder in a liquid N2 cryostat (JANIS VPF-100). The low temperatures (150–300 K) of the devices were controlled by connecting the cryostat to a Lake Shore, 335 temperature controller unit, and dark J-V characteristics were measured using a Keithley 2636 source meter.


  1. 1.

    Cho, K. et al. Highly crystalline low-bandgap polymer nanowires towards high-performance thick-film organic solar cells exceeding 10% power conversion efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 247–25 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yan, H. et al. Efficient organic solar cells processed from hydrocarbon solvents. Nat. Energy 1, 15027 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Murata, H. et al. Efficient inverted polymer solar cells employing favourable molecular orientation. Nat. Photon. 9, 403–408 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Li, Y. et al. 11.4% Efficiency non-fullerene polymer solar cells with trialkylsilyl substituted 2D-conjugated polymer as donor. Nat. Commun. 7, 13651 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hou, J. et al. Energy-Level Modulation of Small-Molecule Electron Acceptors to Achieve over 12% Efficiency in Polymer Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 9423–9429 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hou, J. et al. Fullerene-Free Polymer Solar Cells with over 11% Efficiency and Excellent Thermal Stability. Adv. Mater. 28, 4734–4739 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Keivanidis, P. E. et al. Fullerene-free organic solar cells with an efficiency of 3.7% based on a low-cost geometrically planar perylene diimide monomer. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 14348–14353 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jenekhe, S. A. et al. Nonfullerene Polymer Solar Cells with 8.5% Efficiency Enabled by a New Highly Twisted Electron Acceptor Dimer. Adv. Mater. 28, 124–131 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Friend, R. H. et al. Intermolecular Interactions of Perylene diimides in Photovoltaic Blends of Fluorene Copolymers: Disorder Effects on Photophysical Properties, Film Morphology and Device Efficiency. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 3189–3202 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sun, Y. et al. High Performance Organic Solar Cells Based on a Twisted Bay-Substituted Tetraphenyl Functionalized Perylenediimide Electron Acceptor. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500032 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bredas, J.-L. et al. Tuning the Charge- Transport Parameters of Perylene Diimide Single Crystals via End and/or Core Functionalization: A Density Functional Theory Investigation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 3375–3387 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bazan, G. C. et al. A High-Performing Solution-Processed Small Molecule: Perylene Diimide Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cell. Adv. Mater. 25, 4403–4406 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sastre-Santos, A. et al. Perylenediimides as non-fullerene acceptors in bulk-heterojunction solar cells (BHJSCs). J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 9336–9346 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Park, J. H. et al. Organic photovoltaic cells with nano-fabric heterojunction structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 073301 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yu, L. et al. Electron Acceptors Based on α-Substituted Perylene Diimide (PDI) for Organic Solar Cells. Chem. Mater. 28, 1139–1146 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nuckolls, C. et al. Molecular helices as electron acceptors in high-performance bulk heterojunction solar cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 8242 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Heeger, A. J. et al. High-Performance Solution-Processed Non-Fullerene Organic Solar Cells Based on Selenophene-Containing Perylene Bisimide Acceptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 375–380 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Keivanidis, P. E. et al. Effect of Local and Global Structural Order on the Performance of Perylene Diimide Excimeric Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 11844–11857 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Laquai, F. et al. Polythiophene:Perylene Diimide Solar Cells – the Impact of Alkyl-Substitution on the Photovoltaic Performance. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 297–302 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Narayan, K. S. et al. Nonplanar Perylene Diimides as Potential Alternatives to Fullerenes in Organic Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 2405–2408 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhan, X. et al. A Star-Shaped Perylene Diimide Electron Acceptor for High-Performance Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 26, 5137–5142 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cho, K. et al. A Nonfullerene Small Molecule Acceptor with 3D Interlocking Geometry Enabling Efficient Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 69–76 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang, Z. et al. Non-Fullerene-Acceptor-Based Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells with Efficiency over 7%. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11156–11162 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hou, J. et al. Perylene Diimide Trimers Based Bulk Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells with Efficiency over 7%. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600060 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yan, H. et al. Aggregation and morphology control enables multiple cases of high-efficiency polymer solar cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 5293 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Huang, W. et al. A small molecule/fullerene binary acceptor system for high-performance polymer solar cells with enhanced light-harvesting properties and balanced carrier mobility. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 2460–2465 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hu, B. et al. Unique insight into phase separation in polymer solar cells from their electric characteristics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 29671–29678 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhang, J. et al. Highly efficient polymer solar cells by step-by-step optimizing donor molecular packing and acceptor redistribution. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 709–716 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Greenham, N. C. et al. Perylene Tetracarboxydiimide as an Electron Acceptor in Organic Solar Cells: A Study of Charge Generation and Recombination. J. Mater. Chem. C 113, 21225–21232 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Su, W.-F. et al. Additives for morphology control in high-efficiency organic solar cells. Mater. Today 16, 326–336 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Liang, P.-W. et al. Additive Enhanced Crystallization of Solution-Processed Perovskite for Highly Efficient Planar-Heterojunction Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 26, 3748–3754 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Keivanidis, P. E. et al. Charge versus Energy Transfer Effects in High-Performance Perylene Diimide Photovoltaic Blend Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 24876–24886 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wendt, R. C. et al. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13, 1741–1747 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Janssen., R. A. J. et al. Predicting Morphologies of Solution Processed Polymer:Fullerene Blends. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12057–12067 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cho, K. et al. Critical factors governing vertical phase separation in polymer-PCBM blend films for organic solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 15522–15535 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Han, Y. et al. Cooperative effects of solvent and polymer acceptor co-additives in P3HT:PDI solar cells: simultaneous optimization in lateral and vertical phase separation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 4528–4537 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lidzey, D. G. et al. The Nanoscale Morphology of a PCDTBT:PCBM Photovoltaic Blend. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 499–504 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Darling, S. B. et al. Hierarchical Nanomorphologies Promote Exciton Dissociation in Polymer/Fullerene Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 11, 3707–3713 (2011).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Brabec, C.  J. et al. Correlation Between Structural and Optical Properties of Composite Polymer/Fullerene Films for Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 15, 1193–1196 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Heeger, A. J. et al. Recombination in polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 82, 245207 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cho, K. et al. Propeller-shaped small molecule acceptors containing a 9,9[prime or minute]-spirobifluorene core with imide-linked perylene diimides for non-fullerene organic solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 10610–10615 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Blom, P. W. M. et al. Origin of the light intensity dependence of the short-circuit current of polymer/fullerene solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 203502 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Blom, P. W. M. et al. Space-Charge Limited Photocurrent. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 126602 (2005).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Keivanidis, P. E. et al. On the role of aggregation effects in the performance of perylene-diimide based solar cells. Org. Electron. 15, 1347–1361 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nguyen, T.-Q. et al. Charge carrier recombination in organic solar cells. Prog. in Polym. Sci. 38, 1941–1960 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Huang, J. et al. Reduced Bimolecular Charge Recombination Loss in Thermally Annealed Bilayer Heterojunction Photovoltaic Devices with Large External Quantum Efficiency and Fill Factor. J. Mater. Chem. A 118, 5196–5202 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cho, K. et al. Carrier-Selectivity-Dependent Charge Recombination Dynamics in Organic Photovoltaic Cells with a Ferroelectric Blend Interlayer. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500802 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Deibel, C. et al. Nongeminate and Geminate Recombination in PTB7:PCBM Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 1306–1311 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Coropceanu, V. et al. Charge Transport in Organic Semiconductors. Chem. Rev. 107, 926–952 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Samuel, I. D. W. et al. Charge carrier mobility of the organic photovoltaic materials PTB7 and PC71BM and its influence on device performance. Org. Electron. 22, 62–68 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Qiu, Y. et al. Universal Trap Effect in Carrier Transport of Disordered Organic Semiconductors: Transition from Shallow Trapping to Deep Trapping. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 10651–10660 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wang, Z. et al. Bay-linked perylene bisimides as promising non-fullerene acceptors for organic solar cells. Chem. Commun. 50, 1024–1026 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Jenekhe, S. A. et al. 7.7% Efficient All-Polymer Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 27, 4578–4584 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by a grant (Code No. 2011-0031628) from the Center for Advanced Soft Electronics under the Global Frontier Research Program of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Korea.

Author information




R.S. and S.R.S. conceived the idea and designed the experimental parts. S.R.S. synthesized the bis-PDI small molecule and characterized, R.S. fabricated the devices and studied the device physics. Morphological analysis of the thin films helped by J.L., H.L., and M.K., R.S. and S.R.S. prepared the manuscript under the supervision of K.C., edited, and discussed among all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kilwon Cho.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, R., Suranagi, S.R., Lee, J. et al. Unraveling the efficiency-limiting morphological issues of the perylene diimide-based non-fullerene organic solar cells. Sci Rep 8, 2849 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21162-x

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing