Decreased TESK1-mediated cofilin 1 phosphorylation in the jejunum of IBS-D patients may explain increased female predisposition to epithelial dysfunction


Disturbed intestinal epithelial barrier and mucosal micro-inflammation characterize irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Despite intensive research demonstrating ovarian hormones modulation of IBS severity, there is still limited knowledge on the mechanisms underlying female predominance in this disorder. Our aim was to identify molecular pathways involved in epithelial barrier dysfunction and female predominance in diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) patients. Total RNA and protein were obtained from jejunal mucosal biopsies from healthy controls and IBS-D patients meeting the Rome III criteria. IBS severity was recorded based on validated questionnaires. Gene and protein expression profiles were obtained and data integrated to explore biological and molecular functions. Results were validated by western blot. Tight junction signaling, mitochondrial dysfunction, regulation of actin-based motility by Rho, and cytoskeleton signaling were differentially expressed in IBS-D. Decreased TESK1-dependent cofilin 1 phosphorylation (pCFL1) was confirmed in IBS-D, which negatively correlated with bowel movements only in female participants. In conclusion, deregulation of cytoskeleton dynamics through TESK1/CFL1 pathway underlies epithelial intestinal dysfunction in the small bowel mucosa of IBS-D, particularly in female patients. Further understanding of the mechanisms involving sex-mediated regulation of mucosal epithelial integrity may have significant preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications for IBS.


In recent years, the conventional view of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) as a non-organic disorder has been challenged by several reports showing the presence of neuronal damage, altered neuroplasticity, microbial dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction along with alterations in the expression and localization of intestinal epithelial tight junction (TJ) proteins1. Additionally, a low-grade infiltration of mast cells, lymphocytes and plasma cells and immune activation has been identified in the lamina propria of both large and small bowel mucosa, particularly in diarrhea-predominant IBS patients (IBS-D)2,3,4. Although, the true origin of the intestinal micro-inflammation and immune activation observed in IBS patients is still unknown, a potential pathophysiological link to these findings could be the alteration of the epithelial barrier function, that would lead to disturbed mucosal homeostasis1,5,6,7. In this line, we and others have recently shown altered expression, phosphorylation and localization of core TJ proteins, increased intercellular space and cytoskeleton condensation in jejunal and colonic epithelium of IBS8. These abnormalities may be partly mediated by mast cells through the activation of protease activated receptor 2 (PAR2), which can regulate epithelial barrier function, myosin light chain (MLC) phosphorylation and the expression of cytoskeleton proteins9. PAR2 is activated by serine proteases-mediated cleavage, and these, including tryptase and trypsin, have been shown to be enhanced in the jejunal fluid, feces and supernatants from colonic biopsies of IBS-D10. Moreover, PAR2 epithelial basolateral pools can regulate the actin depolymerization through cofilin 1 (CFL1) by beta-arrestin11. CFL1 has a leading role in actin depolymerization on the barbed end12 and can modulate epithelial permeability by TJ regulation11,13,14 and epithelial cell interactions with extracellular matrix15, events that could be related to cytoskeleton deregulation as observed in the jejunum of IBS-D6,7. Notably, phosphorylation of CFL1 by specific kinases LIMK and TESK116,17 inactivates actin depolymerization which, in turn, is regulated by Rho GTPases and integrin/vinculin signaling, respectively18.

High throughput molecular techniques, such as microarray profiling and RNAseq, followed by accurate analysis of the associated biological pathways have provided new insights on the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of IBS6,19,20,21,22,23. Proteomic tools and related strategies have been recently applied to profile protein expression in urine samples from IBS patients24 and in the colonic mucosa and the neuromuscular layer from rat models mimicking IBS clinical manifestations25,26. However, a comprehensive proteomic profiling in intestinal tissue from IBS patients has not been performed so far.

Our hypothesis was that alterations in molecular pathways modulating epithelial barrier dysfunction determine the female predominance observed in IBS-D patients. To test our hypothesis, we have applied an integrative multi-omics approach combining data from transcriptomic and proteomic profiling analysis in the jejunal mucosa of IBS-D patients vs. healthy controls further subdividing groups by sex.


The jejunal mucosa of IBS-D shows a distinctive proteomic profile

Sixteen healthy controls and 15 IBS-D patients were included in the study (Table 1). Proteomic profiling was performed first in a subset of subjects comprising 4 healthy controls and 4 IBS-D. Analysis of data revealed approximately 1,200 protein spots. By selecting abundance ratio of 1.3-fold as the threshold for the study, 139 spots were differentially produced between the two groups studied (P < 0.05). A search for protein identification was performed by introducing the obtained sequences from 139 spots in public databases, from which 64 proteins were identified (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 2). IPA analysis revealed key pathways for intestinal homeostasis as playing an important role in IBS-D. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/interleukin 1 (IL1)-mediated alterations of nuclear retinoid x receptor (RXR) receptors, mitochondrial dysfunction and regulation of actin-based motility by Rho, appeared as the most significant pathways related to IBS-D proteomic profile (Table 2). Other significant pathways were also found to be related with alterations in actin-cytoskeleton function as clathrin-mediated endocytosis signaling, actin cytoskeleton signaling, caveolar-mediated endocytosis signaling and integrin signaling. In addition, the most significant protein network identified showed CFL1 as playing a key role by interacting with other proteins involved in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton (Fig. 2A). As shown in Fig. 2B, CFL1 is tightly regulated by kinases and phosphatases activity. When CFL1 is phosphorylated in the serine 3 residue by TESK1 or LIMK, CFL1 is inactivated and, generally, translocated to the cell nucleus. As mentioned before, the activity of these kinases can be regulated by RhoGTPases (regulation of LIMK) or by integrin signaling through vinculin (VCL) (regulation of TESK1).

Table 1 Clinical and demographic characteristics of participants.
Figure 1

Proteomic signature of IBS-D patients. (A) DIGE analysis of protein extracts from jejunal mucosal biopsies. Heatmap for the 95 identified spots differentially expressed in IBS-D samples (n = 4) compared to healthy control samples (n = 4). Colors represent relative expression levels on a color scale (green: low/red: high). A total of 1200 spots were analyzed. 139 showed a >1.3-fold change and, from those, 95 spots were identified. Thirty-seven spots showed increased intensity (red-encircled spots), whereas 58 spots showed decreased intensity (green-encircled spots). (B) Annotations for the top ten up- and down-regulated spots identified in IBS-D vs. healthy control samples. Uniprot accession number, protein symbols and name, and their fold change expression in IBS-D with respect to healthy controls are shown.

Table 2 Canonical signaling pathways most significantly associated with IBS-D protein expression profile.
Figure 2

Relationships between differentially expressed proteins in the highest scored network generated by IPA where CFL1 has a central role. (A) Protein-protein interaction network showing the differentially expressed proteins in IBS-D compared to healthy controls and Canonical Pathways (CP) and Biological Functions (Fx) associated to the proteins belonging to this particular network. The intensity of the node color indicates the degree of upregulation (red) or down regulation (green). Genes in uncolored nodes were not identified as differentially expressed in our proteomic study and were integrated into the computationally generated networks on the basis of the evidence stored in the IPA knowledge data base indicating relevance for this network. (B) Summary of the actin depolymerization pathway regulated by CFL1.

Integrated protein/gene expression analysis reveals convergence of canonical pathways, biological functions and disease mechanisms in the jejunal mucosa of IBS-D

In a previous work, we observed differential mucosal gene expression when comparing healthy controls with IBS-D by microarray technology6. In the present study, there was a discrete overlap between differentially expressed genes and proteins in IBS-D patients; however, using an integrated analysis of both expression profiles, we identified common signature pathways, biological functions and disease mechanisms associated with IBS-D (Fig. 3). In particular, cellular assembly and cell-to-cell signaling were the most significant biological functions associated with IBS-D (Fig. 3B). Moreover, immunological, gastrointestinal and inflammatory diseases were the most relevant disease mechanism associated with both IBS-D transcriptional profiles (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3

IPA comparative analysis of microarray and proteomic expression profiles in IBS-D. (A) Canonical signaling pathways; (B) Biological functions; and (C) Diseases and disease mechanisms most significantly associated with IBS-D transcriptomic (dark blue) and proteomic (light blue) profiles. The significance value associated with each category is a measure of the likelihood that the association between dysregulated transcripts and a given category is due to random chance. The x-axis of each graph shows the significance, expressed as the negative exponent of the P-value calculation for each category, increasing with bar height. The orange line shows a threshold P-value of 0.05.

Decreased TESK-1 mediated CFL1-phosphorylation in IBS-D patients

Regulation of actin-based motility by Rho is significantly altered at both transcriptomic and proteomic levels in IBS-D (Fig. 3A) which is consistent with our previous findings showing cytoskeleton alterations in IBS-D patients7. In addition, 28% of the identified altered proteins in IBS-D patients are involved in the dynamic regulation of actin depolymerization events (Fig. 1, Fig. 2A and Supplementary Table 2) where CFL1 plays a major role (Fig. 2). In order to validate our findings, we have further explored the molecular mechanisms by which actin rearrangement and cytoskeleton disruption are linked to the loss of intestinal barrier integrity observed in IBS-D patients7 by analyzing expression of actin-binding proteins in a larger cohort of patients and controls. CFL1-mediated actin polymerization regulation is tightly modulated by phosphorylation events driven by specific kinases and phosphatases, (summarized in Fig. 2B). No differences in protein expression of total CFL1 were observed (Supplementary Figure 2, Fig. 4A,B); however, phosphorylated CFL1 (pCFL1) was reduced in IBS-D patients (Supplementary Figure 2, Fig. 4A,B). In concordance, the CFL1 specific kinase TESK1 was down-regulated in IBS-D patients (Supplementary Figure 2, Fig. 4A,B) and this down-regulation positively correlated with pCFL1 expression level (Fig. 4C). No significant differences in other CFL1 regulatory proteins were found (Supplementary Figure 3). In addition, TESK1 can regulate the localization and expression of VCL, which is the protein connecting actin filaments with integrins18. Expression levels of TESK1 correlate with VCL, however, we did not observe significant differences in VCL comparing healthy controls with IBS-D (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4

Expression analysis CFL1 signaling pathway in IBS-D. (A) Representative Western blot image showing expression of pCFL1, CFL1, TESK1 in the jejunal mucosa of four controls and four patients with IBS-D. (B) Normalization was performed using actin as loading control. Bands were quantified and results are expressed as fold-change respect to the average of the control group. Comparisons were performed by the Mann-Whitney U test (P-values shown). (C) Correlation between the CLF1 phosphorylation levels and VCL expression with TESK1 expression performed by Spearman correlation (rs and P-values shown). HC are represented with circles and IBS-D patients with squares. AU: arbitrary units.

Differential regulation of CFL1-actin activation by sex and disease

To understand the clinical relevance of the molecular changes observed in the CFL1 pathway, we first analyzed the global association between pCFL1 and TESK1 expression with IBS-D major symptoms; however, no significant correlations were found (Supplementary Table 3). Interestingly, when stratifying groups by sex, we observed that female patients showed lower expression levels of pCFL1 and TESK1 compared to male IBS-D patients and healthy controls (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, the expression of these proteins negatively correlated with bowel movements in female subjects (Supplementary Table 3 and Fig. 5B).

Figure 5

Expression analysis CFL1 signaling pathway in IBS-D samples divided by sex. (A) Normalization was performed using actin as loading control. Bands were quantified and results are expressed as fold-change respect to the average of the control group. Comparisons were performed by the Mann-Whitney U test (P-values shown). (B) Correlation between pCFL1 and TESK1 levels and number of bowel movements performed by a Spearman correlation (rs and P-values shown). HC females are represented with circles and IBS-D female patients with squares. AU: arbitrary units.


In the present study, we demonstrate that the jejunum of IBS-D patients has a distinctive proteomic profile compared to healthy controls. As an extension of our previous research, the integrative analysis of gene and protein expression profiles performed here further supports prior studies describing the loss of intestinal epithelial barrier function as a central molecular mechanism in the disease6,7,10,21,23,27. In addition, we reveal for the first time the involvement of TESK1 in human disease, making this protein a potential novel candidate for diagnosis and treatment strategies in IBS.

Proteomic approaches have been previously applied to study the colonic mucosa of experimental models mimicking IBS  clinical manifestations25,26 and, more recently, Goo et al. reported a distinctive proteomic profile in urine samples from IBS patients24. Having studied biological samples from such a different origin (urine vs. tissue, rodent vs. human) it is reasonable to expect no common individual proteins across studies. However, common pathways and functions (regulation of actin-based motility and actin cytoskeleton signaling) are identified in both, urine and jejunal tissue, proving the consistency of our data and suggesting that these pathways may represent novel candidates for biomarker discovery in IBS. However, further studies comparing tissue and urine samples from the same subject will be needed in order to validate proteins from these pathways as potential biomarkers.

The actin cytoskeleton is a highly dynamic structure that undergoes rearrangement (polymerization and depolymerization) under the control of various actin-binding proteins28,29, including members of the CFL1 family and other actin-depolymerizing proteins30,31. Although a decreased expression of total CFL1 in IBS-D could not be validated in our study, we observed lower levels of the inactive form of CFL1 (the phosphorylated protein, pCFL1)32,33. Reduced pCFL1 would result in increased actin depolymerization events compromising, therefore, intestinal epithelial integrity through tight junctions dissassembly and internalization of occludin34,35, alterations previously described in the jejunum of IBS-D patients7. CFL1 phosphorylation is driven by four specific kinases LIMK 1 and 2, and TESK1 and 216,17, and counter-regulated by phosphatases, as slingshot and chronophin/PDXP36,37. Although LIMKs are the most studied kinases in CFL1 inactivation, these proteins were not altered in IBS-D samples. On the contrary, TESK1 was down-regulated in patient samples and correlated with reduced pCFL1, suggesting that TESK1 is a major kinase driving CFL1 inactivation in the small bowel mucosa. Another important pathway regulating CFL1 phosphorylation is ROCK-dependent LIMK activation38. Although we did not observe differences in total expression of ROCK and LIMK, the activity of this pathway could still be depressed due to inactivation of Rho by upstream mechanisms that have not been investigated in the present study. In addition, a crucial binding partner of CFL1, WDR1 (also known as actin-interacting protein-1), was also identified by our proteomic approach. WDR1 is essential for actin depolymerization kinetics through interaction with CFL139. Indeed, a recent study directly implicated WDR1 in the regulation of intercellular junctions and barrier properties of intestinal epithelial cell monolayers40. Hence, upregulation of WDR1 could interact with CFL1 dephosphorylation to stimulate F-actin turnover and destabilize junction-associated actin cytoskeleton in the intestinal mucosa in IBS-D. Alterations in CFL1 pathway may, therefore, be involved in the complex regulatory network of molecular mechanisms underlying increased intestinal epithelial permeability described in IBS-D. Remarkably, although TESK1 has been described to play a key role in integrin-mediated actin reorganization through phosphorylating and inactivating CFL1 and it has been found expressed in epithelial colon cancer cells41, no studies so far have provided evidence of a major role of this protein in any human disease mechanism. Our study represents the first report showing the association of TESK1 expression in human disease, in particular in female subjects. Indeed, a remarkable finding in this work is the identification of sex-dependent differences in CFL1 regulation. In particular, phosphorylation of CFL1 and expression levels of TESK1 are lower and correlated with bowel habits in female IBS-D patients. However, these results should be taken with caution, since the number of subjects is relatively low in each group. Although the relation between sex and cytoskeleton alterations is not clear, a possible explanation could be found in the role of female sexual hormones in the modulation of actin dynamics42. Indeed, estradiol regulates actin cytoskeletal dynamics in the hippocampus and endothelium through ROCK and Rac/p21-activated kinase signaling pathways43,44. In addition, estrogen treatment increases pCFL1 and, in consequence, actin polymerization events45. The connection between actin cytoskeleton rearrangements and sex could, therefore, help to shed some light on the mechanisms associated to the female bias that exist in IBS and, indeed, merit further investigation.

In addition to the actin cytoskeleton-related pathways, LPS/IL1 mediated alterations of nuclear RXR receptors and mitochondrial dysfunctions were identified by IPA analysis with higher significance. Higher concentration of both LPS and IL1 have been previously reported in IBS46,47,48,49 and related to alterations in permeability in cell culture models46. IBS patients have also showed higher expression of IL1 alpha and beta in the duodenum, which correlate with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, bloating, and diarrhea. Furthermore, IL1beta concentration was higher in peripheral blood mononuclear cells supernatants from IBS-D, compared to healthy controls and IBS with constipation, and related with direct stimulation of colonic afferents via TTX-sensitive ion channels and mechanical hypersensitivity. On the other hand, mitochondrial dysfunction is an interesting finding in the jejunal mucosa of IBS-D patients. In this line, we have described significant alterations in mitochondrial enzymatic expression, activity, and morphology in the IBS-like model of crowding stress50,51. These findings may be linked to the cytoskeleton alterations we have previously described in IBS-D7 due to the ATP dependence of the actin polymerization homeostasis which make this process vulnerable to alterations in mitochondrial function30. In fact, estrogen stimulation of epithelial breast cancer cells lead to mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production, which can be increased with the actin disruption and integrin activation52. These effects link our observations, but more studies will be necessary to connect all these pieces together.

Finally, we would like to acknowledge the limitations associated with the approach taken in this study. First, the correlation between transcriptome and proteome data is low. Indeed, the transcriptomic and proteomic independent analysis do not match in the same genes/proteins, however, by integrating data, we identify the same biological pathways and functions. In fact, this multi-omic strategy points to a robust effect of the CFL1 pathway regulating cytoskeleton dynamics and epithelial permeability in IBS-D14,53,54. In addition, it should be taken into account that none of the high-throughput techniques applied here is able to reflect the post-translational events like protein degradation rates and phosphorylation and cellular localization which are known to alter protein half-lives and their detection. Indeed, all three post-translational mechanisms (proteasome degradation, phosphorylation and protein delocalization) have been identified to affect proteins involved in intestinal epithelial integrity in IBS, nor in this study neither in previous reports6,7,23,55. In addition, and related to the former point, several critical proteins involved in intestinal epithelial integrity are absent from our proteomic data. In particular, proteins within the major networks responsible for apical junction stabilization and actin dynamics. This may reflect technical issues with the sensitivity of the proteomics methods available and parameters (for example, false negative and low maximum mass range for peptides with post-translational modifications). Indeed, we took a non-targeted proteomics approach which has certain technical limitations. However, using a more targeted approach, as we did previously for the apical junctional proteins core proteins7 and for TESK1 and other proteins belonging to the CFL1 pathway here, we could identify alterations in these specific proteins in the jejunal mucosa.

In conclusion, our findings support an altered regulation of cytoskeleton dynamics in the small bowel mucosa of IBS-D, particularly in female patients. We show evidence of the involvement of a novel mechanism in bowel dysfunction by TESK1-mediated regulation of CFL1 pathway which may contribute to the female predisposition to suffer IBS. Further understanding of the mechanisms involving sex-mediated regulation of mucosal epithelial integrity may have significant preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications for IBS.

Material and Methods


Recently diagnosed, naïve IBS-D patients meeting the Rome III criteria56 were prospectively recruited from the outpatient gastroenterology clinic. Healthy control subjects were recruited by public advertising, as a control group. Prior to inclusion, a complete medical history and physical examination was carried out in all participants. Food allergy was ruled out using a battery of skin prick tests (Leti, Madrid, Spain) for 32 common food allergens with histamine and saline as positive and negative controls, respectively. Candidates with either positive reaction by skin prick tests or clinical history consistent with food allergy (digestive and/or extra-digestive symptoms associated with exposure to certain food components) were excluded. Other exclusion criteria included age <18 or >70 years, major psychiatric and organic diseases, past episodes of infectious gastroenteritis and gastrointestinal comorbidities, drug or pharmaceutical compound intake in the last 2 weeks, steroids, anti-allergic or immunosuppressive and related drugs in the last 3 months and radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the last 6 months. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant and data was stored in an anonymous fashion according to the approval from the ethics committee of the Institut de Recerca Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron (PR(AG)221/2015). All methods were performed in accordance with our institution guidelines and regulations.

Clinical assessment

The following parameters were recorded in all participants using daily questionnaires over a 10-day period before the biopsy: a) the severity of abdominal pain by a 100-point visual analogue scale; b) the frequency of abdominal pain (number of days with pain); c) the stool frequency (number of bowel movements/day); d) the stool consistency by the Bristol stool form score57.

Experimental design and procedures

In order to narrow down the molecular pathways involved in the origin of IBS-D patients we have combined part of our previously published transcriptomic data7 (data set available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus; accession number GSE14841) with the proteomic profile we have generated in this study. Common pathways and biological functions were subsequently identified using IPA and the most relevant candidates were then further followed-up using complementary and more sensitive approaches in a higher number of patients and controls. Ultimately, obtained data was correlated with clinical data from patients and controls in order to understand the significance of our results.

Tissue samples were obtained as follows. A single mucosal biopsy per participant was obtained from the proximal jejunum, 5–10 cm distal to the Treitz’s angle, using a modified Watson’s capsule as described previously58. Tissue samples were immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for protein analysis as described below.

The following analyses were subsequently performed (Supplementary Figure 1). Detailed description of procedures is given in the supplementary material and methods section.

  1. (a)

    Proteomic profiling by two-dimension difference in-gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) analysis: total protein was isolated from jejunal biopsies of a discovery cohort comprising four healthy controls and four IBS-D. Protein lysates were labeled with either Cy3 or Cy5 cyanine dye to distinguish proteins from healthy controls or IBS-D and 2D-DIGE was performed with pooled samples. Cy3 and Cy5 images were scanned and analyzed for determination of significant alterations in protein abundances using the DeCyder V. 5.0 software59.

  2. (b)

    Protein identification and data analysis: protein spots with higher differences in expression were picked from the gel and digested with trypsin60. Peptide mass fingerprint of proteins was obtained by MALDI-TOF-TOF mass spectrometry and identification through database searches were performed using by Mascot algorithm61. Identified proteins were submitted to the IPA software for the pathway analysis6.

  3. (c)

    Validation of profiling results by western blot: for validation, we included 12 additional controls and 11 additional IBS-D patients. Protein homogenates were separated by electrophoresis and blotted to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. Detection of proteins belonging to specific pathways was performed with primary antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 1. All blots were probed with anti-β-actin antibody as a protein loading control. The bands were scanned and quantitated by densitometry (ImageJ 1.50 software) on the same immunoblot. Values were normalized to β-actin expression and fold-change was calculated for each sample respect to the average of the control group.

Pathway and network analysis

To identify relevant biological pathways implicating those genes and proteins differentially expressed, we applied the IPA methodology (IPA Software, Ingenuity® Systems, IPA integrates selected omics data sets (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics) with mining techniques to predict functional connections and their interpretation in the context of protein networks that comprise protein-protein interactions and related biological functions and canonical signaling pathways. Two types of analysis were performed in our omics data. Further details are given in the supplementary material and methods.

  1. (1)

    Proteomic core analysis to identify the most relevant biological functions and pathways associated to the differentially expressed proteins followed by protein network analysis. For network analysis, IPA computed a score (P-score = −log10(P-value)) according to the fit of the set of supplied genes and a list of biological functions stored in the IPKB. The score takes into account the number of proteins in the network and the size of the network to approximate how relevant this network is to the original list of genes and allows the networks to be prioritized for further studies. In addition, the functions and pathways associated with the proteins in the networks are also identified.

  2. (2)

    Transcriptomic (from reference6) and proteomic integrative analysis to identify common biological functions and pathways.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of proteomic data: image analysis and statistical quantification of relative protein abundances were performed using DeCyder V. 6.0 software (GE Healthcare). Differentially expressed proteins were selected applying a 1.3 fold threshold and P < 0.05.

Statistical analysis for western blot: two-tailed parametric or non-parametric tests were used as appropriate (unpaired Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, respectively) using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software. Relationship between clinical variables and gene expression were assessed by Spearman’s correlation rho. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), unless otherwise stated.

Grant Support

Supported in part by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas-CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Investigación Sanitaria, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad: CD15/00010 (B. Rodiño-Janeiro), IJCI-2015-26099 (C. Martínez), FI12/00254 (E. Salvo-Romero), PI12/00314 & PI15/00301 (C. Alonso-Cotoner), PI11/00716 & PI14/00994 (J. Santos), CPII16/00031, PI13/00935 & PI16/00583 (M. Vicario); CIBER-EHD CB06/04/0021 (FA, CAC, JS, MV); Ministerio de Educación, Dirección General de Investigación: SAF 2016-76648-R (F. Azpiroz); Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, de la Generalitat de Catalunya: 2014 SGR 1285 (F. Azpiroz); Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca, Programa de becas predoctorales “Amics de Vall d’Hebron”: PRED-VHIR-2014-018 (M. Fortea), PRED-VHIR-2016-34 (C. Pardo-Camacho).


  1. 1.

    Enck, P. et al. Irritable bowel syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer 2, 16014 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hughes, P. A. et al. Immune activation in irritable bowel syndrome: can neuroimmune interactions explain symptoms? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108, 1066–1074 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Vicario, M. et al. Increased humoral immunity in the jejunum of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome associated with clinical manifestations. Gut 64, 1379–1388 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wouters, M. M., Vicario, M. & Santos, J. The role of mast cells in functional GI disorders. Gut 65, 155–168 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fiocchi, C. Intestinal inflammation: a complex interplay of immune and nonimmune cell interactions. Am. J. Physiol. 273, G769–775 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Martínez, C. et al. The jejunum of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome shows molecular alterations in the tight junction signaling pathway that are associated with mucosal pathobiology and clinical manifestations. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 107, 736–746 (2012).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Martínez, C. et al. Diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: an organic disorder with structural abnormalities in the jejunal epithelial barrier. Gut 62, 1160–1168 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Martínez, C., González-Castro, A., Vicario, M. & Santos, J. Cellular and molecular basis of intestinal barrier dysfunction in the irritable bowel syndrome. Gut Liver 6, 305–315 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bueno, L. & Fioramonti, J. Protease-activated receptor 2 and gut permeability: a review. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 20, 580–587 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rolland-Fourcade, C. et al. Epithelial expression and function of trypsin-3 in irritable bowel syndrome. Gut, (2017).

  11. 11.

    Lau, C., Lytle, C., Straus, D. S. & DeFea, K. A. Apical and basolateral pools of proteinase-activated receptor-2 direct distinct signaling events in the intestinal epithelium. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 300, C113–123 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ressad, F., Didry, D., Egile, C., Pantaloni, D. & Carlier, M. F. Control of actin filament length and turnover by actin depolymerizing factor (ADF/cofilin) in the presence of capping proteins and ARP2/3 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20970–20976 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nagumo, Y., Han, J., Arimoto, M., Isoda, H. & Tanaka, T. Capsaicin induces cofilin dephosphorylation in human intestinal cells: the triggering role of cofilin in tight-junction signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 355, 520–525 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nagumo, Y., Han, J., Bellila, A., Isoda, H. & Tanaka, T. Cofilin mediates tight-junction opening by redistributing actin and tight-junction proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 377, 921–925 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dai, S. et al. Extracellular high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) inhibits enterocyte migration via activation of Toll-like receptor-4 and increased cell-matrix adhesiveness. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 4995–5002 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Arber, S. et al. Regulation of actin dynamics through phosphorylation of cofilin by LIM-kinase. Nature 393, 805–809 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Røsok, O., Pedeutour, F., Ree, A. H. & Aasheim, H. C. Identification and characterization of TESK2, a novel member of the LIMK/TESK family of protein kinases, predominantly expressed in testis. Genomics 61, 44–54 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Toshima, J. et al. Cofilin phosphorylation by protein kinase testicular protein kinase 1 and its role in integrin-mediated actin reorganization and focal adhesion formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1131–1145 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Aerssens, J. et al. Alterations in mucosal immunity identified in the colon of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6, 194–205 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Camilleri, M. et al. RNA sequencing shows transcriptomic changes in rectosigmoid mucosa in patients with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea: a pilot case-control study. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 306, G1089–1098 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li, L. et al. Increased small intestinal permeability and RNA expression profiles of mucosa from terminal ileum in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Dig. Liver Dis. 48, 880–887 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Macsharry, J. et al. Mucosal cytokine imbalance in irritable bowel syndrome. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 43, 1467–1476 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Martínez, C. et al. miR-16 and miR-125b are involved in barrier function dysregulation through the modulation of claudin-2 and cingulin expression in the jejunum in IBS with diarrhoea. Gut 66, 1537–1538 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Goo, Y. A. et al. Urinary proteome analysis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptom subgroups. J. Proteome Res. 11, 5650–5662 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ding, Y. et al. Proteomic analysis of colonic mucosa in a rat model of irritable bowel syndrome. Proteomics 10, 2620–2630 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lopes, L. V. et al. Maternal deprivation affects the neuromuscular protein profile of the rat colon in response to an acute stressor later in life. J. Proteomics 71, 80–88 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhou, Q. et al. MicroRNA 29 targets nuclear factor-κB-repressing factor and Claudin 1 to increase intestinal permeability. Gastroenterology 148, 158–169.e8 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cavey, M. & Lecuit, T. Molecular bases of cell-cell junctions stability and dynamics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1, a002998 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Davidson, A. J. & Wood, W. Unravelling the Actin Cytoskeleton: A New Competitive Edge? Trends Cell Biol. 26, 569–576 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bamburg, J. R. & Wiggan, O. P. ADF/cofilin and actin dynamics in disease. Trends Cell Biol. 12, 598–605 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ono, S. Mechanism of depolymerization and severing of actin filaments and its significance in cytoskeletal dynamics. Int. Rev. Cytol. 258, 1–82 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Agnew, B. J., Minamide, L. S. & Bamburg, J. R. Reactivation of phosphorylated actin depolymerizing factor and identification of the regulatory site. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17582–17587 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Moriyama, K., Iida, K. & Yahara, I. Phosphorylation of Ser-3 of cofilin regulates its essential function on actin. Genes Cells Devoted Mol. Cell. Mech. 1, 73–86 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Shen, L. & Turner, J. R. Actin depolymerization disrupts tight junctions via caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 3919–3936 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Terai, T., Nishimura, N., Kanda, I., Yasui, N. & Sasaki, T. JRAB/MICAL-L2 is a junctional Rab13-binding protein mediating the endocytic recycling of occludin. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 2465–2475 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Niwa, R., Nagata-Ohashi, K., Takeichi, M., Mizuno, K. & Uemura, T. Control of actin reorganization by Slingshot, a family of phosphatases that dephosphorylate ADF/cofilin. Cell 108, 233–246 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gohla, A., Birkenfeld, J. & Bokoch, G. M. Chronophin, a novel HAD-type serine protein phosphatase, regulates cofilin-dependent actin dynamics. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 21–29 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Amano, M., Nakayama, M. & Kaibuchi, K. Rho-kinase/ROCK: A key regulator of the cytoskeleton and cell polarity. Cytoskelet. Hoboken NJ 67, 545–554 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kile, B. T. et al. Mutations in the cofilin partner Aip1/Wdr1 cause autoinflammatory disease and macrothrombocytopenia. Blood 110, 2371–2380 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lechuga, S., Baranwal, S. & Ivanov, A. I. Actin-interacting protein 1 controls assembly and permeability of intestinal epithelial apical junctions. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 308, G745–756 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ferraro, A., Boni, T. & Pintzas, A. EZH2 regulates cofilin activity and colon cancer cell migration by targeting ITGA2 gene. PloS One 9, e115276 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hansberg-Pastor, V., González-Arenas, A., Piña-Medina, A. G. & Camacho-Arroyo, I. Sex Hormones Regulate Cytoskeletal Proteins Involved in Brain Plasticity. Front. Psychiatry 6, 165 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kramár, E. A. et al. Cytoskeletal changes underlie estrogen’s acute effects on synaptic transmission and plasticity. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 29, 12982–12993 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Simoncini, T. et al. Estrogen receptor alpha interacts with Galpha13 to drive actin remodeling and endothelial cell migration via the RhoA/Rho kinase/moesin pathway. Mol. Endocrinol. Baltim. Md 20, 1756–1771 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Briz, V. & Baudry, M. Estrogen Regulates Protein Synthesis and Actin Polymerization in Hippocampal Neurons through Different Molecular Mechanisms. Front. Endocrinol. 5, 22 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ludidi, S. et al. The intestinal barrier in irritable bowel syndrome: subtype-specific effects of the systemic compartment in an in vitro model. PloS One 10, e0123498 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Dlugosz, A. et al. Increased serum levels of lipopolysaccharide and antiflagellin antibodies in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 27, 1747–1754 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Srivastava, D., Ghoshal, U., Mittal, R. D. & Ghoshal, U. C. Associations between IL-1RA polymorphisms and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth among patients with irritable bowel syndrome from India. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 26, 1408–1416 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hughes, P. A. et al. Sensory neuro-immune interactions differ between irritable bowel syndrome subtypes. Gut 62, 1456–1465 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Vicario, M. et al. Chronic psychosocial stress induces reversible mitochondrial damage and corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type-1 upregulation in the rat intestine and IBS-like gut dysfunction. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37, 65–77 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Vicario, M. et al. Chronological assessment of mast cell-mediated gut dysfunction and mucosal inflammation in a rat model of chronic psychosocial stress. Brain. Behav. Immun. 24, 1166–1175 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Felty, Q. et al. Estrogen-induced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species as signal-transducing messengers. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 44, 6900–6909 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Shiobara, T., Usui, T., Han, J., Isoda, H. & Nagumo, Y. The reversible increase in tight junction permeability induced by capsaicin is mediated via cofilin-actin cytoskeletal dynamics and decreased level of occludin. PloS One 8, e79954 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wang, D. et al. Actin-Depolymerizing Factor and Cofilin-1 Have Unique and Overlapping Functions in Regulating Intestinal Epithelial Junctions and Mucosal Inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 186, 844–858 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Coëffier, M. et al. Increased proteasome-mediated degradation of occludin in irritable bowel syndrome. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105, 1181–1188 (2010).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Drossman, D. A. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology 130, 1377–1390 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lewis, S. J. & Heaton, K. W. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 32, 920–924 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Guilarte, M. et al. Diarrhoea-predominant IBS patients show mast cell activation and hyperplasia in the jejunum. Gut 56, 203–209 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    May, C., Brosseron, F., Chartowski, P., Meyer, H. E. & Marcus, K. Differential proteome analysis using 2D-DIGE. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ 893, 75–82 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M., Vorm, O. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 68, 850–858 (1996).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hirosawa, M., Hoshida, M., Ishikawa, M. & Toya, T. MASCOT: multiple alignment system for protein sequences based on three-way dynamic programming. Comput. Appl. Biosci. CABIOS 9, 161–167 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank all patients and healthy volunteers for their kind support in participating in this study and the supporting staff at each site. Thanks to Milagros Gallart for expert technical assistance and to Laura Hernández who provided assistance in the performance of jejunal biopsies. Thanks to the VHIO Proteomics Core Facility directed by Francesc Canals for their expert technical and scientific support. Many thanks to Josefina Heredia and Gloria Santaliestra for excellent secretarial assistance.

Author information




B.K.R.-J. and C.M. contributed to the experimental design, study coordination, acquisition/analysis of experimental data, and drafting of the manuscript; B.L., M.P. and A.N. contributed to participant recruitment, performance of biopsies, and creation/maintenance of study database; M.F., A.M.G.-C., E.S.-R., C.P.-C., and C.I. conducted experimental analysis and data interpretation; F.A. contributed to clinical advice and critical revision of the manuscript; C.A.-C. and J.S. contributed to patient recruitment and collection of clinical data, project supervision and drafting of the manuscript; M.V. contributed to the experimental design, project supervision and drafting of the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and the manuscript at all stages. All named authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bruno K. Rodiño-Janeiro or Javier Santos.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodiño-Janeiro, B.K., Martínez, C., Fortea, M. et al. Decreased TESK1-mediated cofilin 1 phosphorylation in the jejunum of IBS-D patients may explain increased female predisposition to epithelial dysfunction. Sci Rep 8, 2255 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.