Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# A Quantum Biomimetic Electronic Nose Sensor

## Abstract

We propose a technologically feasible one-dimensional double barrier resonant tunneling diode (RTD) as electronic nose, inspired by the vibration theory of biological olfaction. The working principle is phonon-assisted inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy (IETS), modeled here using the Non-Equilibrium Green Function formalism for quantum transport. While standard IETS requires low-temperature operation to obviate the thermal broadening of spectroscopic peaks, we show that quantum confinement in the well of the RTD provides electron energy filtering in this case and could thereby allow room-temperature operation. We also find that the IETS peaks - corresponding to adsorbed foreign molecules - shift monotonically along the bias voltage coordinate with their vibrational energy, promising a selective sensor.

## Introduction

The nascent field of quantum biology1 seeks to study biological systems where non-trivial quantum effects play functional roles. Examples of such systems are excitonic energy transfer in photosynthesis, avian magnetoreception, hydrogen tunneling in enzyme reactions, and, possibly, olfaction. Classical neurobiology holds that olfaction proceeds by a ‘lock and key’ mechanism whereby it is the structure of a molecule that is sensed2. There is, however, also a heterodox picture called the vibration theory of olfaction, which was proposed for the first time in 1938 by Malcolm Dyson and elaborated by R.H. Wright in 1977; it lay dormant until 1996, when Luca Turin gave it concrete shape by propounding inelastic quantum-mechanical tunneling as the mechanism for vibration sensing.

According to the vibration theory, the smell of a molecule is determined by its vibrational spectrum3,4,5. While some experimental evidence has emerged over the years in favor of a role for vibrational modes6,7,8,9,10, there is also evidence to the contrary that supports the classical picture11,12,13,14. An emerging theory, called the “swipe card” model combines the features of the classical and quantum theories15,16. As the name suggests, it proposes a ‘key’, but with information encoded on it. First, the odorant molecule (‘key’) must be structurally compatible with the corresponding receptor in order to bind (‘lock’); and second, that opens up an inelastic electron tunneling channel between receptor contacts corresponding to its specific vibrational energy, and is thereby smelled (sensed).

## Results and Discussion

### Theory

The vibration theory of olfaction owes its operating principle to the much older characterization technique called Inelastic Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy (IETS)5. The current-voltage (I-V) characteristic of a tunneling barrier, usually a metal-insulator-metal (MIM) structure17, exhibits a kink when the applied voltage supersedes the energy of a vibrational mode in the system, thereby opening up an inelastic tunneling channel; this kink is exhibited as a peak in the d 2 I/dV 2 characteristic, thus enabling spectroscopy of vibrational modes18. We note as an aside that the second derivative is practically measured by locking in on the second harmonic of a small signal in order to minimize the effect of noise19. IETS can be a powerful technique because of its sensitivity and its ability to detect modes that might be optically inaccessible19. However, IETS on an MIM tunnel barrier in the laboratory is practically limited to cryogenic temperatures because thermal broadening of the contact Fermi  levels20 leads to merging of spectroscopic peaks at higher temperatures21. On the other hand, if inelastic electron tunneling indeed plays a functional role in natural olfaction as some of the evidence now suggests, that would imply that nature has figured out a way around the thermal broadening problem. Even if natural olfaction is not IETS-based, a room-temperature IETS-based (viz. biomimetic, in the Turin sense) electronic nose is an intriguing possibility, with great promise for gas-sensing applications22 of importance such as environmental monitoring, healthcare and security. One way around the thermal broadening problem here might be energy-filtering through the use of quantum structures. In previous work, we have explored a one-dimensional (1D) molecular wire as a candidate for an IETS-based electronic nose23. However, we found that it would still be unable to resolve IET spectra at room temperatures due to thermal broadening. Patil21 has discussed using quantum dots (QDs) as electron energy filters to restrict electron energies at room temperature. As a QD has discrete energy levels, it allows only electrons with certain energies to flow. For sensing applications, we need arrays of QDs so as to get reasonable sensing area. But, a 2D array of QDs forms energy minibands unlike a single QD and hence fails to act as an efficient energy filter.

In this work, we show using inelastic quantum transport simulations, that a 1D double-barrier resonant tunneling diode (RTD) can be used as an effective energy filter to achieve room temperature operation as an IETS-based electronic nose. Note that this work is focused on demonstrating the viability of inelastic tunneling as a sensing mechanism. Thus, we do not yet get into important sensor performance questions such as quantitative estimation of sensitivity, surface functionalization etc. Even so, we propose a 3D network of such RTDs connected in parallel to common leads as shown in Fig. 1a. This type of arrangement obviously helps to increase the sensor area. Figure 1b shows the schematic of a 1D (nanowire) symmetric RTD connected to semi-infinite leads and its conduction band with phonon-assisted inelastic tunneling. Before taking up its working principle, we point out that if a RTD gets shorted out for some reason, that would affect the total current flowing through the network and lead to an erroneous vibration spectrum; therefore, we propose two or more RTDs connected in series in each nanowire as shown in Fig. 1c. We note that the device structure is within the reach of current technology24, requiring superlattice nanowire growth25,26,27 to be wedded to vertical nanowire device fabrication28,29,30,31,32,33.

Now, for a single RTD, it is well-known that when the applied voltage is such that the resonant (broadened, quasi-stationary state) energy level in the well is pulled down below the conduction band edge on the emitter side, electrons cannot tunnel through the barrier elastically, and the resonant current drops precipitously to give a well-known negative differential resistance region34. However, an electron could lose energy by emitting a vibron (quantum of localized molecular vibration) or phonon (quantum of collective vibration of the material), and thereby open up an additional tunneling channel at an applied voltage for which E FB  − E W  = ħω, where ħω is the phonon/vibron mode energy. In this case, electrons can tunnel inelastically to the energy level in the well. This process manifests itself in a second, typically smaller, satellite peak in the I-V characteristics. The presence of the satellite peak has been experimentally demonstrated by Goldman et al.35. The peaks in the IET spectrum corresponding to the satellite peak in I-V characteristics can then be used as the signature of vibrational modes in this case. We find that the position of the IETS peak maps monotonically to the vibrational mode energy present in the device and thereby identify an adsorbed odorant molecule.

In our simulation, we assume that electron-phonon interaction is present only in the RTD region and not in contacts. We employ the Non-Equilibrium Green’s Function (NEGF) formalism within the self-consistent Born approximation to describe inelastic tunneling transport which is discussed in detail in the Appendix. We have chosen the following set of parameters for simulations: The RTD is assumed to be constituted of barriers comprising fifteen atomic sites each and a well region comprising ten sites at temperature T = 300 K with ε = 0 eV, t = 5.2 eV, [See Fig. 1b for reference]. The contact Fermi energy E FB  = 20meV and E FB  − E FT  = V A , where V A is the applied bias and the barrier height V B  = 0.6 eV. The electron-phonon (e-ph) coupling energy is same at each grid point for a given phonon mode.

### Observations

We start with a simple demonstration of the simulation setup, looking at quantum transport across the RTD with collective phonon modes present in the system. Figure 2 shows the simulated I-V characteristics and IET spectrum of the RTD with two phonon modes with energies ħω 1 = 0.09 eV and ħω 2 = 0.175 eV. We observe from Fig. 2a that, in addition to the main peak, there are two satellite peaks in the I-V characteristics due to the two phonon modes; Fig. 2b shows the corresponding IET spectrum. Each satellite peak in the I-V results in a set of two peaks in the IETS, one for the local maximum and another for the local minimum. Thus, the peaks at V = 0.5 V and V = 0.68 V correspond to the local maxima for ħω 1 = 0.09 eV and ħω 2 = 0.175 eV respectively. The first two peaks represent the peak and valley current of the RTD. As the I-V is not smooth, the second derivative is quite noisy. To mitigate this, we apply a simple second order Butterworth filter to smoothen the IET spectrum here; more sophisticated circuitry may be used for this purpose in actual hardware. With that, we are in principle able to identify the bulk phonon modes present in the RTD using IETS at room temperature. Now, the presence of discernible satellite peaks in the I-V might raise a question about the need to take the second derivative, viz. IETS. However, the peaks here are perceptible because the phonon mode used is a bulk mode, i.e. it is present everywhere in the device. But if the mode is localized, the satellite peak itself might be too weak to be discernible. In this case, which could be the default for sensing applications, it then becomes necessary to get the IET spectrum.

In order to investigate the basic sensing functionality, we model the effect of a foreign molecule attached to a particular site in the device as a modulation of the hopping term t at that site. In our case, it is modified to t p  = 4.5 eV. In Fig. 3, the localized phonon mode associated with the foreign molecule has energy ħω f  = 0.09 eV and the bulk phonon mode has ħω = 0.175 eV. The foreign molecule is attached to a site in the emitter side (bottom) barrier as shown in Fig. 1b. Here the satellite peak in the I-V characteristics (Fig. 3a) due to the localized mode is not visible and we need to calculate the IET spectrum to detect it. In Fig. 3b, the IETS peak for the localized mode can be seen at V = 0.55 V along with the peak at V = 0.65 V corresponding to the bulk mode. Here we have not applied any smoothing filter to the IET spectrum as that would also flatten the weak peaks due to localized mode.

Next, we take a look at how this device would sense various types of odorants, distinguished by their vibrational energies. Figure 4a shows the IET spectrum for the RTD with a bulk phonon mode ħω = 0.175 eV and vibron with energy ranging from 0.09 eV to 0.15 eV placed in the bottom barrier layer. The peaks beyond 0.5 V correspond to the phonon peaks and those before 0.5 V are due to the peak and valley current of the RTD. We see that the position of the peak due to the localized mode shifts uniformly with the vibrational energy (Fig. 4b). This demonstrates that we can distinguish between odorant molecules with different phonon mode energies using the RTD. We recognize that the sensor will not be able to differentiate between non-identical molecules with equal vibrational energies; but this may not be very different from biological olfaction where molecules with very different structure but similar vibrational energy have been found to smell similar5. We also note that if the peaks for the bulk and localized modes are very close to each other, the bulk mode will dominate over the localized mode. Hence, we are able to identify only those odorant molecules whose vibrational energies lie in a particular range.

A practical consideration in device design here is the available area for adsorbing foreign molecules. In particular, for this device, the question is whether all its regions - well and barriers - are equally effective for this purpose. Figure 5 shows the IET spectrum for a foreign molecule located in different regions of the RTD. We observe that the IETS peak corresponding to the localized mode is absent if the foreign molecule is attached anywhere except the emitter side (bottom) barrier. We can infer that the incoming electron excites vibrational modes predominantly in the barrier region so as to tunnel across when the energy level E W in the well falls bellow the conduction band in the emitter. This renders the rest of the RTD ineffective for sensing the foreign molecule, and thus, the effective sensing region is only the emitter side barrier. In order to increase the sensing area of a single RTD, we, therefore, propose using an asymmetric RTD with wider emitter side barrier as shown in Fig. 1d.

### Conclusion

We have investigated the double barrier resonant tunneling device as a potential candidate to overcome the thermal broadening problem in IETS using quantum confinement for energy filtering. We have demonstrated theoretically that it is possible to detect foreign odorant molecules at room temperature using this structure and thereby established its feasibility as an electronic nose. We have observed that only one of the barriers of the RTD, that on the emitter side, is effective for detection of foreign molecules; this suggests that asymmetric device designs ought to be explored. The RTD design considered in this work can detect molecules with vibrational energy roughly from 0.09 eV to 0.15 eV. Explosives such as Nitramine (RDX), TNT and Nitrate ester (PETN) have prominent signatures in this range of the vibration spectrum36,37,38. For a given compound detection, we can modify the height and width of the RTD to change the energy range of detection and use multiple RTDs in conjunction to measure the entire vibration spectrum. We have proposed a 3D parallel nanowire architecture for improving the total sensing area, with two RTDs in series to afford short protection. The proposed sensing device brings us a step closer to the emulation of the vibration model of animal olfaction and raises the hope of realizing an electronic nose that can truly rival natural ones. Further work needs to focus on the fabrication of such quantum devices, their surface functionalization, and importantly, optimized signal processing circuitry for the second derivative extraction. Thereafter, one would be in a position to realistically quantify the sensitivity and selectivity of the sensor and benchmark it to existing systems.

## Methods

The NEGF modeling for a 1D RTD is very similar to that of a quantum wire using a 1D grid and can be found in39. We model the RTD region with N sites connected to semi-infinite leads using the effective mass Hamiltonian H RTD obtained by using the finite difference method on atomistic Hamiltonian40. Here onsite energy is ε + 2t and the hopping energy is −t.

$${H}_{RTD}={[\begin{array}{cccc}\varepsilon +2t & -t & & 0\\ -t & \varepsilon +2t & -t & \\ & \ddots & \ddots & -t\\ 0 & & -t & \varepsilon +2t\end{array}]}_{N\times N}$$
(1)

We calculate the retarded Green’s Function using:

$$G(E)={[(E+\iota {\eta }^{+})I-{H}_{RTD}-{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{B}(E)-{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{T}(E)-{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{scat}(E)]}^{-1}$$
(2)

here, Σ B (E), Σ T (E) and Σ scat (E) are the self energies corresponding to the bottom lead, the top lead and the phonon bath respectively [refer Fig. 1b]. The contact self energies, Σ B (E) and Σ T (E) incorporate contact boundary conditions in the Hamiltonian. Similarly, Σ scat (E) includes the effects of phonon bath which can be treated as a scattering terminal akin to the “Büttiker probe”. Hence, the total current flowing through this terminal is equal to zero.

$${{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{scat}(E)=\frac{-\iota }{2}[{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{scat}^{in}(E)+{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{scat}^{out}(E)]$$
(3)

The electron(hole) correlation functions are given by:

$${G}^{n(p)}(E)=G{{\rm{\Sigma }}}^{in(out)}{G}^{\dagger }$$
(4)

where $${{\rm{\Sigma }}}^{in(out)}={{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{B}^{in(out)}+{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{T}^{in(out)}+{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{scat}^{in(out)}$$.

The in/out-scattering functions for phonons $${{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{scat}^{in(out)}$$ at a particular site can be calculated within self-consistent Born approximation using the following equations:

$${{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{sca{t}_{q}}^{in}(E)=\sum _{{\eta }}{D}_{q}^{\eta }[n(\hslash \omega ){G}^{n}(E-\hslash \omega )+(n(\hslash \omega )+\mathrm{1)}{G}^{n}(E+\hslash \omega )]$$
(5)
$${{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{sca{t}_{q}}^{out}(E)=\sum _{{\eta }}{D}_{q}^{\eta }[n(\hslash \omega ){G}^{p}(E+\hslash \omega )+(n(\hslash \omega )+\mathrm{1)}{G}^{p}(E-\hslash \omega )]$$
(6)

where $${D}_{q}^{\eta }$$ is e-ph coupling constant at grid point q for phonon mode η with energy ħω. n(ħω) is Bose distribution function for phonons given by $$1/\{{\exp }[\hslash \omega /({k}_{B}T)]+1\}$$. The total current through the RTD is given by:

$$I=\frac{2e}{h}\int Tr[{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{B}^{out}(E){G}^{n}(E)-{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{B}^{in}(E){G}^{p}(E)]dE$$
(7)

From (4), (5) and (6), it can be seen that G n(p)(E) and $${{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{scat}^{in(out)}$$ are interdependent and hence need to be solved self-consistently. The algorithm to calculate current is shown in Fig. 6. We then take the second derivative of the current with respect to the applied voltage in order to calculate its IET spectrum.

## References

1. 1.

Huelga, S. & Plenio, M. Vibrations, quanta and biology. Contemporary Physics 54, 181–207 (2013).

2. 2.

Vosshall, L. B. Laying a controversial smell theory to rest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 6525–6526 (2015).

3. 3.

Malcolm Dyson, G. The scientific basis of odour. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 57, 647–651 (1938).

4. 4.

Wright, R. H. Odor and molecular vibration: neural coding of olfactory information. Journal of theoretical biology 64, 473IN1475–474IN2502 (1977).

5. 5.

Turin, L. A spectroscopic mechanism for primary olfactory reception. Chemical Senses 21, 773–791 (1996).

6. 6.

Franco, M. I., Turin, L., Mershin, A. & Skoulakis, E. M. C. Molecular vibration-sensing component in drosophila melanogaster olfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 3797–3802 (2011).

7. 7.

Gane, S. et al. Molecular vibration-sensing component in human olfaction. PloS one 8, e55780 (2013).

8. 8.

Haffenden, L., Yaylayan, V. & Fortin, J. Investigation of vibrational theory of olfaction with variously labelled benzaldehydes. Food Chemistry 73, 67–72 (2001).

9. 9.

Havens, B. R. & Meloan, C. E. The application of deuterated sex pheromone mimics of the american cockroach (periplaneta americana, l.), to the study of wright’s vibrational theory of olfaction. Developments in Food Science 37, 497–524 (1995).

10. 10.

Hara, J. Olfactory discrimination between glycine and deuterated glycine by fish. Experientia 33, 618–619 (1977).

11. 11.

Saberi, M. & Seyed-Allaei, H. Odorant receptors of drosophila are sensitive to the molecular volume of odorants. Scientific reports 6 (2016).

12. 12.

Block, E. et al. Implausibility of the vibrational theory of olfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, E2766–E2774 (2015).

13. 13.

Keller, A. & Vosshall, L. B. A psychophysical test of the vibration theory of olfaction. Nature neuroscience 7, 337 (2004).

14. 14.

Editorial. Testing a radical theory. Nature neuroscience 7, 315 (2004).

15. 15.

Brookes, J. C., Horsfield, A. P. & Stoneham, A. M. The swipe card model of odorant recognition. Sensors 12, 15709–15749 (2012).

16. 16.

Brookes, J. C., Hartoutsiou, F., Horsfield, A. P. & Stoneham, A. M. Could humans recognize odor by phonon assisted tunneling? Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 038101 (2007).

17. 17.

Reed, M. A. Inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy. Materials Today 11, 46–50 (2008).

18. 18.

Jaklevic, R. C. & Lambe, J. Molecular vibration spectra by electron tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1139–1140 (1966).

19. 19.

Hipps, K. & Mazur, U. Inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy. In Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy (John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2006).

20. 20.

Hansma, P. K. Inelastic electron tunneling. Physics Reports 30, 145–206 (1977).

21. 21.

Patil, P. Design and fabrication of electron energy filters for room temperature inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (2013).

22. 22.

Bommisetty, V. et al. Gas sensing based on inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy. IEEE Sensors Journal 8, 983–988 (2008).

23. 23.

Patil, A., Saha, D. & Ganguly, S. Molecular wire for quantum biomimetic electronic nose. In 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), 12–14 (2016).

24. 24.

Carnevale, S. D., Yang, J., Phillips, P. J., Mills, M. J. & Myers, R. C. Three-Dimensional GaN/AlN Nanowire Heterostructures by Separating Nucleation and Growth Processes. Nano Letters 11, 866–871 (2011).

25. 25.

Gudiksen, M. S., Lauhon, L. J., Wang, J., Smith, D. C. & Lieber, C. M. Growth of nanowire superlattice structures for nanoscale photonics and electronics. Nature 415, 617–620 (2002).

26. 26.

Wu, Y., Fan, R. & Yang, P. Block-by-block growth of single-crystalline Si/SiGe superlattice nanowires. Nano Letters 2, 83–86 (2002).

27. 27.

Kapon, E., Tamargo, M. & Hwang, D. Molecular beam epitaxy of GaAs/AlGaAs superlattice heterostructures on nonplanar substrates. Applied physics letters 50, 347–349 (1987).

28. 28.

Hochbaum, A. I., Fan, R., He, R. & Yang, P. Controlled growth of Si nanowire arrays for device integration. Nano letters 5, 457–460 (2005).

29. 29.

Tomioka, K., Motohisa, J., Hara, S. & Fukui, T. Control of InAs nanowire growth directions on Si. Nano letters 8, 3475–3480 (2008).

30. 30.

Yang, P. et al. Controlled growth of ZnO nanowires and their optical properties. Advanced Functional Materials 12.

31. 31.

Bao, X.-Y. et al. Heteroepitaxial growth of vertical GaAs nanowires on Si (111) substrates by metal- organic chemical vapor deposition. Nano letters 8, 3755–3760 (2008).

32. 32.

Noborisaka, J., Motohisa, J. & Fukui, T. Catalyst-free growth of GaAs nanowires by selective-area metalorganic vapor-phase epitaxy. Applied Physics Letters 86, 213102 (2005).

33. 33.

Mårtensson, T. et al. Epitaxial III- V nanowires on silicon. Nano Letters 4, 1987–1990 (2004).

34. 34.

Sun, J. P., Haddad, G. I., Mazumder, P. & Schulman, J. N. Resonant tunneling diodes: models and properties. Proceedings of the IEEE 86, 641–660 (1998).

35. 35.

Goldman, V. J., Tsui, D. C. & Cunningham, J. E. Evidence for LO-phonon-emission-assisted tunneling in double-barrier heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 36, 7635–7637 (1987).

36. 36.

McNesby, K. L. & Pesce-Rodriguez, R. A. Applications of vibrational spectroscopy in the study of explosives. Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy (2002).

37. 37.

Liu, Y., Perkins, R., Liu, Y. & Tzeng, N. Normal mode and experimental analysis of TNT Raman spectrum. Journal of Molecular Structure 1133, 217–225 (2017).

38. 38.

Liu, Y., Tzeng, N., Liu, Y. & Junk, T. Normal mode analysis of isotopic shifts in Raman spectrum of TNT-d5. Journal of Molecular Structure 1143, 438–443 (2017).

39. 39.

Anantram, M. P., Lundstrom, M. S. & Nikonov, D. E. Modeling of nanoscale devices. Proceedings of the IEEE 96, 1511–1550 (2008).

40. 40.

Datta, S. Quantum transport: atom to transistor (Cambridge University Press, 2005).

## Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, through the Centre of Excellence in Nanoelectronics.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

D.S. and S.G. conceived the study. A.P. performed the simulations. A.P. and S.G. analyzed the results and prepared the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swaroop Ganguly.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Patil, A., Saha, D. & Ganguly, S. A Quantum Biomimetic Electronic Nose Sensor. Sci Rep 8, 128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18346-2

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Vibration-based biomimetic odor classification

• Nidhi Pandey
• Debasattam Pal
• Swaroop Ganguly

Scientific Reports (2021)