The Human Blood-Nerve Barrier Transcriptome

Abstract

The blood-nerve barrier (BNB), formed by tight junction-forming microvessels within peripheral nerve endoneurium, exists to regulate its internal microenvironment essential for effective axonal signal transduction. Relatively little is known about the unique human BNB molecular composition. Such knowledge is crucial to comprehend the relationships between the systemic circulation and peripheral nerves in health, adaptations to intrinsic or extrinsic perturbations and alterations that may result in disease. We performed RNA-sequencing on cultured early- and late-passage adult primary human endoneurial endothelial cells and laser-capture microdissected endoneurial microvessels from four cryopreserved normal adult human sural nerves referenced to the Genome Reference Consortium Human Reference 37 genome browser, using predefined criteria guided by known transcript or protein expression in vitro and in situ. We identified 12881 common transcripts associated by 125 independent biological networks, defined as the normal adult BNB transcriptome, including a comprehensive array of transporters and specialized intercellular junctional complex components. These identified transcripts and their interacting networks provide insights into peripheral nerve microvascular morphogenesis, restrictive barrier formation, influx and efflux transporters with relevance to understanding peripheral nerve homeostasis and pharmacology, including targeted drug delivery and the mediators of leukocyte trafficking in peripheral nerves during normal immunosurveillance.

Introduction

Peripheral nerves are structurally divided into three compartments: the outermost epineurium that consists of longitudinal arrays of collagen fibers in which fenestrated macrovessels directly derived from the extrinsic peripheral nerve blood supply reside (known as vasa nervorum); the inner perineurium, which consists of concentric layers of specialized myofibroblasts with intercellular tight junctions, that surround the innermost endoneurium, consisting of a loose array of collagen fibers in which myelinated and unmyelinated axons and non-fenestrated tight junction-forming microvessels reside, with rare leukocytes and fibroblasts1,2,3,4,5. In order to facilitate normal axonal signal transduction (essentially dependent on sodium/potassium flux) to and from the peripheral nervous system, the endoneurial microenvironment is strictly regulated3,5,6. Tight junction-forming perineurial myofibroblasts provide a critical interface between the endoneurial and epineurial interstitial fluid compartments that helps further regulate the endoneurial microenvironment; however, these cells are not in direct contact with circulating blood. Endoneurial microvessels are in direct contact with circulating blood, and are considered to form the blood-nerve barrier (BNB)7.

In mammals, the BNB is generally considered the second most restrictive mammalian microvascular barrier after the blood-brain barrier6,8,9,10,11,12. In situ, endoneurial microvessels share their basement membrane with pericytes that may act as specialized smooth muscle cells that regulate the microvasculature in response to differences in neural activity, blood pressure and volume1,2,13. Phenotypic and functional differences occur between micro- and macrovascular endothelial cells within the same tissue, between endothelial cells from different tissues and endothelial cells from the same tissues in different species, with molecular and functional adaptations occurring dependent on the cellular microenvironment14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23. Extrapolation of observations and functional mechanisms from other restrictive microvascular barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier, or epithelial cells, provides general knowledge on restrictive barrier systems that may not specifically apply to peripheral nerves.

There is limited knowledge on the molecular composition, and as a consequence, the mechanistic changes that occur at the human BNB during development, in healthy homeostatic states and in disease4. Such knowledge is paramount to understanding peripheral nerve angiogenesis, vascular differentiation and the role of the BNB in regulating the endoneurial microenvironment to facilitate normal axonal growth and myelination, as well as the development and maintenance of its specialized restrictive barrier and adaptations to physiological changes in the systemic circulation. Furthermore, transport of water, ions and polar molecules, solutes, nutrients (sugars, amino acids, fatty acids), macromolecules and drugs into and out of the endoneurium in physiologic and pathophysiologic states has direct relevance to peripheral nerve function in health and disease, including targeted drug delivery.

The BNB is a major interface of interaction between hematogenous leukocytes and peripheral nerve endoneurium, thus peripheral nerve immunosurveillance and adaptive or pathological alterations that facilitate leukocyte transmigration following injury, inflammation and in autoimmune neuropathies (i.e. peripheral nerve immunobiology) requires identification of the relevant molecular components24. Animal model studies aimed at understanding peripheral nerve leukocyte trafficking in vivo should be guided by knowledge derived from human observational in situ data in order to increase biological relevance and translational potential.

Significant advances have been made following the recent isolation and successful development of primary and immortalized human endoneurial or peripheral nerve endothelial cell lines that have resulted in some in vitro observational and functional studies relevant to understanding BNB angiogenesis, wound healing, response to extrinsic insult and metabolic derangements and alterations following physiological cytokine stimulus and normal/pathologic leukocyte trafficking7,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33. However, current knowledge is incomplete as phenotypic changes may occur following primary endothelial cell isolation from endoneurial microvessels and culture compared to endoneurial endothelial cells in vivo, and immortalization may further alter the molecular composition and function of human BNB-forming endoneurial cells. Previous in situ peripheral nerve studies have identified several molecules expressed by the BNB using histochemical methods;17,24,34,35,36,37,38,39 however, such studies are limited by the quality of tissue preservation, availability and specificity of antibodies and other detection reagents, the clinical/scientific question being addressed, and possible ascertainment bias.

In order to more completely elucidate the molecular composition of the normal human BNB, as required to provide an essential framework to understand endoneurial endothelial cell biology and the molecular determinants of physiologically relevant interactions between the systemic circulation and peripheral nerve endoneurium, we performed whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing or RNA-Sequencing on cultured early (P3)- and late (P8)-passage adult primary human endoneurial endothelial cells (pHEndECs) and laser-capture microdissected endoneurial microvessels from 4 cryopreserved normal adult human sural nerves to determine transcripts conserved in vitro with progressive culture and expressed by BNB-forming endoneurial microvessels in situ. We validated the human BNB transcriptome in situ by indirect immunohistochemistry of 31 expressed proteins performed on a histologically normal cryopreserved adult sural nerve from an individual not used for RNA-sequencing.

Results

Sample description

Archival slides of 1% toluidine blue-stained, basic fuchsin-counterstained 1 μm thick semi-thin plastic-embedded sections from the four normal adult sural nerves (2 men and 2 women, mean age 51 years at the time of biopsy) demonstrated normal axonal density (Fig. 1 A) and normal appearing endoneurial microvessels (Fig. 1B). FITC-conjugated Ulex Europaeus agglutinin-1 (UEA-1, a lectin that specifically binds to α-fucose residues and is generally considered to be the best marker of human vascular endothelial cells)7,40 accurately identified endoneurial microvessels and epineurial macrovessels on Optimum Cutting Temperature (OCT)-preserved axial sural nerve cryostat sections (Fig. 1C). The minimum total endoneurial microvessel area dissected per sural nerve biopsy was 135,516 μm2. Phase contrast photomicrographs demonstrate the spindle-shaped pHEndEC monolayer in culture 24 hours after confluence (Fig. 1D and E). Following reverse transcription, High Sensitivity cDNA electropherogram traces following depletion of ribosomal cDNA confirmed library quality prior to next generation sequencing (>90% between 150–750 base pairs in size, with >75% between 200–400 base pairs), as shown for a representative laser-capture microdissected pooled and concentrated endoneurial microvessel sample (Fig. 1F) and the P3 pHEndEC sample (Fig. 1G). The minimum concentration of cDNA obtained was 1900 pg/μL for endoneurial microvessels, with an average of 3100 pg/ μL obtained from confluent pHEndECs.

Figure 1
figure1

Sample characteristics. A representative digital light photomicrograph of a normal adult sural nerve plastic-embedded axial section, depicting the three peripheral nerve compartments is shown (A), with normal appearing endoneurial microvessels shown at higher magnification (B). A representative digital fluorescent photomicrograph of a normal sural nerve axial cryosection shows UEA-1-positive (green) endoneurial and epineurial vessels (C). A representative phase contrast digital photomicrograph shows confluent pHEndEC monolayers in culture (D), with a higher magnification image demonstrating their spindle shape without intercellular gaps (E). High sensitivity digital electropherograms following ribosomal RNA depletion demonstrate high quality cDNA for RNA sequencing from laser-capture microdissected endoneurial microvessels from a single normal adult (F) and P3 pHEndECs (G). Scale bars: A = 100 µm, B = 10 µm, C = 500 µm, D = 200 µm, E = 100 µm.

Sequenced transcript quality and human genome alignment

Quality (Q) Scores demonstrated a probability of base calling error for each base pair by the sequencer for each sample as <0.001 for all samples, negating the need to remove any low quality reads/bases from the datasets. cDNA from all 4 laser-capture microdissected endoneurial microvessel samples had >50% of sequenced reads align uniquely or to multiple loci of the human genome (range 50.62–85.46%) with average input read length 137 (range 123–145). P3 and P8 pHEndEC cDNA had >95% of sequenced reads align uniquely or to multiple loci of the human genome (P3 96.67%; P8 96.72%) with an input read length of 98 for both samples. For all samples, >20 million reads aligned to the human reference genome (range 22.3–40.6 million), with no chimeric reads detected.

Human BNB transcriptome

Using predefined criteria of Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million (FPKM) >0.1 (based on the lowest observed value of identified transcripts previously known to be expressed by the human BNB in vitro and in situ), we identified 18002 transcripts from a total of 60252 transcripts expressed by both P3 and P8 pHEndECs (the in vitro BNB [IVBNB]), with an 80.2% transcript overlap between these passages. 2122 transcripts were identified in the P3 pHEndECs only, associated by a total of 40 independent networks and subnetworks that predominantly reflected regulation of cell division and gene transcription (Supplementary Data file S1). 2312 transcripts were identified in the P8 pHEndECs only, associated by a total of 109 independent networks and subnetworks that predominantly reflected endothelial cell de-differentiation (83 independent networks; Supplementary Data file S2). A total of 15375 transcripts (out of 60252) were expressed by at least three of four laser capture microdissected microvessels (the in situ BNB [ISBNB]).

We identified 11281 transcripts expressed by the IVBNB and ISBNB, defining the normal human BNB transcriptome. These transcripts were associated by a total of 125 independent biological process, cellular component and molecular function networks, encompassing a total of 1369 networks and subnetworks (Supplementary Data file S3). There was a 67% transcript overlap between deduced human BNB and IVBNB, with an 84% overlap between the deduced human BNB and ISBNB, with an additional 5121 transcripts expressed in vitro only and 2492 transcripts expressed in situ only (Fig. 2A). Hierarchical clustering further demonstrated similarities (i.e. the human BNB) and differences between the IVBNB and ISBNB (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2
figure2

Human BNB transcriptome. Venn diagrams depict the human BNB defined as transcripts expressed by both the In Vitro BNB and In Situ BNB, with numbers indicating the number of transcripts identified based on predefined criteria (A). Hierarchical clustering (B) demonstrates transcripts that are equally expressed in vitro and in situ (a), highly expressed in situ (b), expressed in situ only (c), highly expressed in vitro (d) and expressed in vitro only (e).

The transcripts expressed in vitro only were associated by 20 independent biological networks (total of 31 networks and subnetworks) that are predominantly indicative of active cell division, but also indicate cytokine/chemokine binding and regulation of leukocyte trafficking networks not detected in situ (Supplementary Data file S4). The transcripts expressed in situ only were associated by 42 major independent networks (total of 192 networks and subnetworks) that include myelination, nervous system development, glial cell differentiation, neuronal action potential signaling and circulatory system processes. These networks implied significant exclusion of in situ contaminating Schwann cells, axons and pericytes from the deduced human BNB transcriptome (Supplementary Data file S5).

The deduced human BNB transcriptome included previously identified vascular endothelial markers, enzymes, scavenger receptors, mitogen receptors, nutrient transporters, cellular adhesion molecules, chemokines, adherens and tight junction and junction associated molecules4,7,17,24,27,28,32,35,37,41, validating the accuracy of the deduced transcriptome. These had been identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), immunohistochemistry or western blot. We further validated the BNB transcriptome by demonstrating expression of 31 selected cell membrane, chemokine receptor, cytoskeletal, junctional complex and secreted proteins by endoneurial microvessels in situ by indirect fluorescent immunohistochemistry (Fig. 3). The human BNB transcriptome also includes the uniformly expressed microvascular endothelial cell-specific transcription factor orthologs previously identified in mice42. Biologically important networks identified of particular importance to a restrictive microvascular barrier include endothelial cell migration/differentiation/angiogenesis/morphogenesis, intercellular protein organization/assembly, regulation of molecular transport, and immune response processes.

Figure 3
figure3

Validation of the human BNB transcriptome. Merged digital photomicrographs of sural nerve endoneurial microvessels (UEA-1 FITC-positive, green) in situ show BNB endothelial cell expression (yellow-green, yellow or orange co-localization dependent of the relative fluorescent intensity of protein marker in red) of transporters (ABCA8, ABCB1, AQP1, SLC1A1, SLC2A1, SLC3A2, SLC5A6, SLC16A1 and SLC19A2), cytoskeletal proteins (ACTG1, CALD1, FLNA, MYO10), cell membrane proteins (CAV1, CD44, CD63, ESAM), junctional complex proteins (CDH5, CDH6, CLDN4, CLDN5, CTNNA1, GJA1, LIN7A, MPDZ, PCDH1, TJP1, VEZT, ZYX), vascular endothelial cell secreted protein CTGF, and chemokine receptor CXCR4. Positive expression of AQP1, CALD1, CAV1, CD44, CD63, FLNA, MYO10 and SLC2A1 (red) by cells that surround and are in direct contact with endothelial cells (most likely pericytes), and ABCA8 by cells close to but not in direct contact with endothelial microvessels (most likely Schwann cells) are also observed. Nuclei are identified in blue. Original magnification 400X.

A total of 408 transcripts expressed in situ were also expressed by P3 pHEndECs only. These transcripts were only associated by 4 independent biological networks: single organism signaling, nervous system development, cell communication and cell periphery; supporting the notion that these transcripts predominantly represent contaminating Schwann cell and axonal transcripts that were lost with endothelial cell culture (Supplementary Data file S6). However, glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) receptor GFRA1 (FPKM P3 = 0.15, P8 = 0) and its tyrosine kinase component, RET (FPKM P3 = 0.17, P8 = 0), previously detected and biologically active in response to exogenous GDNF at the human BNB in vitro during restoration of restrictive barrier characteristics following diffuse injury27, were detected through this analysis. Other potentially relevant BNB transcripts that may have been lost with pHEndEC culture based on our detection criteria include ABCB4 (energy-dependent phospholipid efflux transporter, FPKM P3 = 0.62, P8 = 0.05), AQP7 (water channel, FPKM P3 = 0.28, P8 = 0), CDH19 (adherens junction protein, FPKM P3 = 1.99, P8 = 0), CELSR2 (adherens junction protein, FPKM P3 = 0.41, P8 = 0.09), CGN (tight junction associated protein, FPKM P3 = 0.14, P8 = 0), GJC3 (gap junction protein, FPKM P3 = 0.16, P8 = 0.09), SLC17A7 (sodium-dependent phosphate transporter, FPKM P3 = 0.3, P8 = 0.09), SLC1A3 (glutamate transporter, FPKM P3 = 0.63, P8 = 0.09), SLC22A15 (organic ion transporter, FPKM P3 = 0.14, P8 = 0.01), SLC35F1 (unknown function, FPKM P3 = 1.34, P8 = 0.04), SLC38A3 (sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter, FPKM P3 = 0.71, P8 = 0.08), and protocadherins, PCDHGC4 (FPKM P3 = 0.17, P8 = 0.08) and PCDHGC5 (FPKM P3 = 0.21, P8 = 0.03).

There is a diverse repertoire of transcripts expressed by the deduced normal human BNB, supportive of an active role in homeostatic peripheral nerve function, and dispelling the notion that microvascular endothelial cells provide a relatively passive conduit for blood flow in normal healthy tissues. The repertoire of biological processes is depicted in Fig. 4, with “cellular process”, “metabolic process” and “localization” being three most common biological processes observed. In terms of molecular function, “binding”, “catalytic activity” and “structural molecule activity” represent the three most prevalent seen at the human BNB, as shown in Fig. 5, while genes involved in “cell part”, “organelle” and “macromolecular complex” are the most prevalent in terms of cellular component are shown in Fig. 6. The diversity of classified human BNB protein-coding transcripts is shown in Fig. 7, with “nucleic acid binding”, “transcription factor”, “hydrolase”, “enzyme modulator” and “transferase” being the most prevalent.

Figure 4
figure4

Human BNB Biological Process. PANTHER generated pie charts and bar histograms demonstrate the diversity of human BNB biologic processes and the number of genes implicated in each process.

Figure 5
figure5

Human BNB Molecular Function. PANTHER generated pie charts and bar histograms demonstrate human BNB molecular function and the number of genes involved with each function.

Figure 6
figure6

Human BNB Cellular Component. PANTHER generated pie charts and bar histograms demonstrate human BNB cellular component and the number of genes that contribute to each component.

Figure 7
figure7

Human BNB Protein Class. PANTHER generated pie charts and bar histograms demonstrate the diversity of human BNB protein classes and the number of genes classified in each group.

Human BNB transporters

The human BNB demonstrated 509 transporter transcripts that include members of the solute carrier transporter family (196), ATP-binding cassette transporter family (33), cation channels (76), anion channels (13), zinc transporters (14), solute carrier organic anion transporters (4) and aquaporins (3), as shown in Supplementary Data file S7. The extensive array of influx and efflux transporters, including several amino acid, carbohydrate, monocarboxylate and multidrug resistant transporters previously or currently demonstrated at the BNB by PCR, immunohistochemistry or western blot in vitro or in situ 4,7,25,30,37,43, provides a blueprint to determine which transporters are required for human endoneurial endothelial cell metabolism, as well as those responsible for maintaining endoneurial homeostasis by transporting essential ions, polar molecules, solutes, nutrients and macromolecules from circulating blood into the endoneurium for normal Schwann cell and axonal function, and removing metabolic waste products and xenobiotics from the endoneurium.

Human BNB intercellular junction complex

The molecular composition of the intercellular junction complex provides insights to the components of a specialized restrictive microvascular barrier system in health, as required to determine alterations that may occur in disease states. We ascertained expression of 133 intercellular junctional complex transcripts, including 22 tight junction or junction-associated molecules, 45 adherens junction or junction-associated molecules, and 52 cell junction-associated or adaptor molecules by the human BNB (Supplementary Data file S8), significantly expanding previous limited knowledge4,5,7,27,30,32,35. Tight junction transcripts include 6 members of the claudin family (CLDN1, CLDN11, CLDN12, CLDN15, CLDN4 and CLDN5), occludin, zona occludens-1 and -2, junction adhesion molecules-1, -2 and -3, and endothelial cell adhesion molecule. Adherens junction transcripts include cadherins (CDH11, CDH13, CDH15, CDH2, CDH24, CDH5 and CDH6) and 36 protocadherins (a cadherin subfamily highly expressed in neural tissues)44. Cell junction-associated or adapter transcripts include the catenin family (α1, β1, δ1, and γ), nectin cell adhesion molecule-1, -2 and -3, and 8 members of the membrane associated guanylate kinase family. Five gap junction channel transcripts (known to facilitate intercellular communication [including between endothelial cells], as may be required for autocrine signaling pathways, for example, during neurodevelopment45) were also detected (GJA1, GJA4, GJA5, GJC1, GJC2).

Chemokines and chemokine receptors

We determined which chemokines and chemokine receptors may have homeostatic roles during immunosurveillance at the human BNB or actively participate in innate immune responses. These include CCL14 (induces enzyme release from monocytes), CCL2 (monocyte/macrophage and T-cell trafficking), CX3CL1 (natural killer, monocyte/macrophage, and T-cell trafficking), CXCL16 (natural killer T-cell trafficking and survival), and CXCL3 (neutrophil trafficking)46. Expression of CXCL12 with its signaling receptor CXCR4 and atypical receptor ACKR3 (also known as CXCR7) that serves to modulate chemokine gradients for CXCR4, implies an important autocrine effect at the human BNB, such as in vascular remodeling46. Interestingly, expression of CCL28 and one of its receptors, CCR10 by the human BNB similarly implies an autocrine role in normal endoneurial endothelial cell physiology (e.g. endothelial cell migration and capillary formation)47, suggesting redundancy in an important microvascular biological process. CXCR5 (typically expressed by B- and T-cells and has been recently shown to facilitate extracellular matrix remodeling)48 is also expressed by the human BNB.

As  stated previously, chemokine binding and regulation of leukocyte trafficking networks were detected in vitro that were not observed in situ. Transcripts detected in vitro only include chemokines involved in neutrophil trafficking (CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL5, CXCL6 and CXCL8), T-helper 1 cell trafficking (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11), T-helper 2 cell trafficking (CCL7, CCL8 and CCL26), T-helper 17 trafficking (CCL20), T-cell, and monocyte/macrophage trafficking as part of the innate and adaptive immune responses (CCL3, CCL4 and CCL5) and CCL16 implicated in dendritic cell maturation46. Atypical chemokine receptor CCRL2 (also known as ACKR5; function is currently undefined, but may serve as a “chemokine sink”) is also expressed by the IVBNB. It is possible that these endothelial cells are activated by in vitro culture resulting in increased chemokine gene transcription or there is some chemokine system dysregulation in situ following nerve biopsy and cryopreservation precluding detection and inclusion as part of the normal human BNB. Nonetheless, these data support an active role of the human BNB in hematogenous leukocyte interactions in peripheral nerves, as previously implicated24,26,43,49,50.

Immunoglobulin transport

Of further clinical relevance is the transport of circulating immunoglobulins (pathogenic or therapeutic) across the tight junction-forming human BNB. We observed transcript expression of FCGRT (Fc fragment of IgG receptor and transporter) which binds to the monomeric region of IgG to facilitate its transcytosis to the apical or basolateral membrane of endothelial cells51 by the human BNB. However, PIGR (polymeric immunoglobulin receptor: binds dimeric IgA and pentameric IgM)51 was not expressed, suggesting that these large molecular weight antibody subclasses do not undergo human BNB transport in normal nerves or do so via undefined non-receptor-mediated transcytosis pathways. It remains to be determined whether adaptive or pathologic changes in FCGRT or PIGR expression occur at the human BNB with different disease states to modulate immunoglobulin transport between the blood circulation and the endoneurium.

Discussion

We utilized RNA-sequencing on confluent P3 and P8 pHEndEC monolayers and normal adult laser-capture microdissected endoneurial microvessels to deduce the human BNB transcriptome. Genome Reference Consortium Human Reference 37 (hg19) was used rather than the more recently released Reference 38 (hg38) as hg19 is currently the most widely accepted genome to align human data to, with most of the current human genome databases utilizing hg19 coordinates.

pHEndECs isolated and purified from a single donor were used, and previous work demonstrated a ~95% purity at P3, using indirect fluorescent immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, with loss of contaminating pericytes and fibroblasts with continued culture using our defined culture conditions that involved seeding these endothelial cells at 10,000–15,000 cells/cm2 7. Variations in pHEndEC shape and diameter with differences in cytoplasm-to-nucleus ratio in culture had been observed based on the proliferating state7. By selecting transcripts expressed by both P3 and P8 pHEndECs to define the IVBNB transcriptome, we sought to identify transcripts that persisted with continuous cell culture and eliminate induced transcript expression as a direct consequence of recent endothelial cell isolation from peripheral nerves that required ex vivo manual endoneurial bundle stripping, aggressive enzymatic digestion and density gradient centrifugation, as well as the effects of pHEndEC de-differentiation that may occur as a consequence of extended in vitro culture.

By selecting transcripts expressed in endoneurial microvessels from three of the four normal adult sural nerves, we sought to include conserved transcripts in unrelated individuals and reduce the effect of contaminating luminal or migrating leukocytes, pericytes that share a basement membrane with endothelial cells and myelinated axons that are commonly reside ~5–10 μm away from endoneurial microvessels as shown on glutaraldehyde-fixed, osmium tetroxide post-fixed, plastic-embedded sections (Fig. 1B). A high concentration of UEA-1 FITC was used to identify endoneurial microvessels in ethanol-fixed cryostat sections at lower magnification to facilitate rapid laser capture microdissection as to limit RNA degradation associated with sample processing and direct laser effects. Rather than view and image the residual endoneurium following endoneurial microdissection, we observed each microdissection cap at higher magnification for extraneous material and excised these using tape or laser ablation, depending on its size.

Taking into account our definition of the human BNB transcriptome, the probability that transcripts identified as the IVBNB (18002/60252) and ISBNB (15375/60252) occur in both independently derived transcriptomes is 0.076 [(18002/60252) x (15375/60252)], supporting our notion that the identified transcripts are highly conserved by normal adult endoneurial endothelial cells in vitro and in situ. The validity of approach is further evidenced by the inclusion of transcripts that were previously demonstrated at the BNB in vitro or in situ by PCR, immunohistochemistry or western blot, our indirect fluorescent immunohistochemistry validation of endoneurial microvessel protein expression in situ, evaluating transcripts with mean FPKM values between 0.8 and 750.5 in situ and 0.4 and 3012.4 in vitro using another histologically normal adult cryopreserved sural nerve biopsy, as well as uniformly expressed microvascular endothelial specific transcription factor orthologs (i.e. vascular identity factors) previously observed in mice, including cerebral microvascular endothelial cells4,7,17,24,25,28,30,35,37,42. We also identified a few additional transcripts, such as the previously validated GFRA1 and its receptor tyrosine kinase RET 27, intercellular junctional complex molecules and transporters that were expressed by laser-capture microdissected endoneurial microvessels in situ that were lost with pHEndEC culture. It is important to recognize that some “classic” markers of pericytes, Schwann cells and fibroblasts are known to be expressed by vascular endothelial cells, emphasizing the importance of using biological networks and subnetworks deduced from PANTHER analysis to aid identify cell types based on known or expected biological function52,53,54,55.

This comprehensive list of transcripts and the associated networks provides the framework for biologically relevant studies on human BNB angiogenesis during peripheral nerve development and following injury, formation of restrictive intercellular junctions and adaptations under normal physiological and pathophysiological states, hydraulic conductivity (i.e. transendothelial water flux) in response to changes in hydrostatic pressure and endoneurial interstitial volume and the transport kinetics of ions, polar molecules, solutes, nutrients, macromolecules (such as immunoglobulins) and drugs/ xenobiotics into and out of the peripheral nerve endoneurium in health and disease. Hypothesis-driven studies relevant to leukocyte-endothelial interactions unique to the human BNB during immunosurveillance would be guided by the established transcriptome profile of chemokines and other constitutively expressed cellular adhesion molecules. Furthermore, direct transcript database comparison of the human BNB transcriptome with restrictive and non-restrictive barrier-forming human microvascular endothelial cells, including the blood-brain barrier, would aid determine transcripts and specific biological networks potentially unique to the human BNB for functional assessment using pHEndECs in vitro.

Our overall strategy makes the assumption that any rare contaminating Schwann cells, pericytes, axons and endoneurial macrophages and fibroblasts present following pHEndEC isolation that may exist in early passage cultures would be lost with continuous culture in endothelial cell growth supporting conditions. Our data analysis showed 89.4% of transcripts expressed by P3 pHEndECs and 88.6% of transcripts expressed by P8 pHEndECs were expressed by both and included in the IVBNB transcript database, attesting to the fact that there was relatively little change in transcript expression between passages 3 and 8. This observation does not support preferential proliferation of contaminating cells such as pericytes with extended pHEndEC culture. Excluded transcripts were predominantly associated by networks involved in regulation of cell division and gene transcription (P3) and de-differentiation (P8).

We cannot exclude the possibility that cultured pHEndECs could have acquired some non-vascular transcripts due to early de-differentiation that overlap with these contaminating cells in situ, resulting in their inclusion as part of the human BNB transcriptome. In situ RNA degradation in OCT-cryopreserved sural nerves and subsequent degradation following endoneurial laser capture microdissection could have occurred, resulting in a failure to completely identify transcripts expressed by purified viable endoneurial endothelial cells in vitro. Another question is whether there is appreciable microvascular endothelial cell heterogeneity within the same or different parts of the peripheral nerve endoneurium. The sural nerve is one of the terminal branches of the sciatic nerve with its fascicles in direct continuation, so we do not necessarily expect differences in BNB molecular composition. We did not attempt to evaluate BNB diversity between normal adult nerves in this study; however deduction of the normal human adult BNB transcriptome provides a framework for future comparative studies. It is also quite possible that some of the expressed protein coding transcripts are not translated, or expressed in the presumed cellular compartments at the human BNB in vivo. The overall aim was to establish a comprehensive molecular signature of the normal human BNB, providing an essential blueprint or reference guide for future translationally relevant peripheral nerve biology studies in health and disease.

Targeting drug delivery across restrictive tight junction-forming microvascular barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier, and target site tissue retention at physiologically active concentrations have become essential considerations in therapeutic drug design strategies. This has implications for effective local and systemic drug administration targeting normal (e.g. anesthesia) and abnormal peripheral nerves (e.g. analgesia) with limited off-target or unwanted side effects. Knowledge of the components and regulators of small molecule and macromolecular transport unique to the human BNB would aid medicinal chemists and pharmacologists develop drugs with high BNB influx permeability, utilizing the array of influx transporters, channels and receptor-mediated transcytosis components to aid drug design, with specific modifications made to modulate drug efflux in the opposite direction as a means of increasing peripheral nerve endoneurial bioavailability and efficacy.

Detailed knowledge of the molecules relevant for BNB angiogenesis and intercellular junction complex formation could guide therapeutic strategies for peripheral nerve repair following traumatic injury, recognizing that rapid restoration of the normal endoneurial microenvironment may be an essential prerequisite for axonal regeneration and remyelination. Incorporation of specific essential vascular growth and differentiation factors in peripheral nerve grafts/conduits that facilitate BNB formation is an important consideration with translational potential to the clinic guided by the human BNB transcriptome.

Similarly, this study also provides essential information on the possible determinants of leukocyte trafficking during normal immunosurveillance and the biological networks that may be implicated in peripheral nerve innate and adaptive immune responses. This knowledge could provide insights into understanding the mechanisms of human BNB response to injury, microbial entry from the bloodstream into peripheral nerves and response to viral infections. Our work should also guide studies designed to understand the interactions between the systemic immune compartment and peripheral nerves relevant to understanding the pathogenesis and targeted treatment of peripheral nerve-restricted autoimmune disorders such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. It is hoped that the deduced human BNB transcriptome and its associated networks and subnetworks will stimulate hypothesis-driven mechanistic studies that would significantly increase our understanding of specialized restrictive barrier-forming human microvascular endothelium.

Materials and Methods

Human sural nerve laser-capture microdissection

OCT-cryopreserved sural nerve biopsies stored at −80 °C from 4 adults (2 men and 2 women) with histologically normal peripheral nerves defined as no visually detectable structural abnormalities on routine light microscopy with no known history of systemic or neurological disorders were obtained from the Shin J Oh Muscle and Nerve Histopathological Laboratory, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Informed consent for clinical and research purposes was obtained from every patient undergoing biopsy. The study was approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board, with an exemption obtained to use archived pathological specimens for research (Protocol Number X140321012). All specimen handling and experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations as stipulated by the University of Alabama at Birmingham. To reduce the impact of RNase activity, RNase-free reagents were utilized whenever available, and all materials and surfaces including tissue slides, cryotome blades and blade holder were cleaned with RNaseZap (Invitrogen) and 70% ethanol prior to sectioning.

20 μm thick axial cryostat sections were transferred to polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) membrane glass slides (Invitrogen catalog number LCM0522) and stored in 50 mL centrifuge tubes at −80 °C for no longer than 10 days. In order to detect endoneurial microvessels, slides were fixed for 2 minutes in 95% ethanol, rinsed twice for 30 seconds in RNase-free phosphate buffered saline (RF-PBS; Ambion), and stained with 500 μL of 100 μg/mL FITC conjugated Ulex Europaeus Agglutinin (UEA)-1 (UEA-1 FITC, Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO) in RF-PBS for 5 minutes. Slides were washed five times for 10 seconds each in RF-PBS and dehydrated in 70% ethanol for 30 seconds, 95% ethanol for 30 seconds, 100% ethanol for 1 minute and xylene (≥99% pure) for 5 minutes, adapting a protocol used for cerebral microvessels56.

UEA-1 FITC-positive endoneurial microvessels were imaged, annotated, and captured using the Arcturus XT system equipped with CapSure Macro laser-capture microdissection [LCM] Caps (Invitrogen catalog number LCM0211). Epineurial and perineurial macrovessels were excluded. Capture was performed using the following infrared (IR) settings: IR spot spacing = 80; IR spot diameter = 6; IR spot power = 80; IR spot duration = 50; IR spot/cut length = 500; tab length = 0; with ultraviolet (UV) cut length = 1500; and UV cutting speed = 1000. Additional xylene dehydration was required to reduce high background fluorescence on some slides prior to annotation and capture. Following capture, each cap was inspected for inappropriately captured tissue. Large extraneous areas were gently removed with tape, while smaller areas were ablated with the laser. Caps were placed in a 0.5 mL microcentrifuge tube with 50 μL RNA extraction buffer, inverted, and stored on dry ice or at −80 °C until RNA isolation. Unless otherwise stated, all reagents were from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA).

Similarly, 20 μm thick axial cryostat sections were also transferred to polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) membrane slides (Leica Microsystems; Buffalo Grove, IL) for LCM using a Leica Microsystems LMD6 scope and stored at −80 °C for no longer than 10 days. To identify endoneurial microvessels, slides were fixed for 2 minutes in 70% ethanol, and washed for 30 and 60 seconds in RF-PBS. Slides were stained 350 μL of 40 μg/mL UEA-1 FITC in RF-PBS for 10 minutes, washed for 30 and 60 seconds in RF-PBS, dehydrated for 2 minutes in 70% ethanol followed by 30 seconds in 100% ethanol, and air dried for 5 minutes. Endoneurial microvessels were microdissected using the Leica system using the “Move and Cut” mode over a 30 min period according to the manufacturer’s instructions, excluding epineurial and perineurial macrovessels. Laser alignment was tested prior to capture for each slide used. The LMD6 system UV (355 nm) laser uses a pulse frequency of 80 Hz, pulse length of < 4 ns and maximum pulse intensity of 70 μJ, with dissected material dropping into the collection tube cap by gravity. Sample humidity levels were controlled by limiting drying times and excessive static was alleviated by dipping slides in 70% alcohol. Following capture, 50 μL of Qiazol (Qiagen; Hilden, Germany) was added to well of cap, the tube was closed and incubated inverted at room temperature for 5 minutes, and stored on dry ice or −80 °C until RNA isolation.

RNA isolation

RNA was isolated from endoneurial microvessels dissected with the Arcturus XT system using the Arcturus Pico Pure Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s directions. Caps were heated at 42 °C for 35 minutes (using Pico Pure extraction buffer (XB)) for 15 minutes with membrane removal using RNaseZap-treated forceps and placed in bottom of tube in XB for additional 20 minutes. Following RNA binding to the column, an on-column DNase digestion for 15 minutes using 80 μL DNase Mixture (Qiagen RNase-free DNase Set, catalog number 79254) was performed to remove contaminating genomic DNA. RNA was eluted using 20 μL RNase-free water supplied with the kit. RNA from endoneurial microvessels dissected with the Leica system was extracted using the miRNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany, catalog 217084), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. On-column DNase digestion was also performed to remove contaminating genomic DNA using the RNase-free DNase Set (Qiagen, catalog79254). Isopropanol-containing RNA was eluted using RNase-free water. Extracted RNA was stored at −80 °C prior to further use.

Primary human endoneurial endothelial cell culture and RNA isolation

Primary human endoneurial endothelial cells (pHEndECs) were previously isolated and purified from the sciatic nerves of a decedent 38 year old woman with no known history of systemic or neurological disease via endoneurial stripping, and sequential enzymatic digestion and density centrifugation, and cultured as published7. pHEndECs were expanded on rat-tail collagen-coated Coring CellBIND® flasks or Petri dishes in freshly prepared growth medium consisting of RPMI-1640, 10% NuSerum, 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% vitamin solution, 1% non-essential amino acid solution, 1% sodium pyruvate, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 mM HEPES buffer, and enriched with 50 μg/mL endothelial cell growth supplement, 1 ng/mL human recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor and 10 U/mL heparin, from the same vendors. pHEndECs were passaged at 80–90% confluence, and allowed to grow to complete confluence at early- (P3) and late- (P8) passages before total RNA was extracted 24 hours later using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions, as previously published7,25,27. Extracted RNA was stored at −80 °C prior to further use.

RNA-Sequencing

RNA yield and quality were determined on an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer using the Pico Chip (Santa Clara, CA). RNA obtained from a minimum of 200 laser-capture microdissected endoneurial microvessels per adult nerve were pooled and concentrated on a Savant SpeedVac (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA) or used as extracted from P3 and P8 pHEndECs. cDNA libraries were generated using the SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit - Pico Input Mammalian (Clontech, catalog 635005) and ribosomal cDNA was depleted prior to the final amplification step as per the manufacturer’s instructions. High Sensitivity DNA electropherogram traces were captured on the BioAnalyzer to confirm the quality of the RNA-Seq Libraries. The final libraries were quantified by quantitative PCR (Kapa Biosystems, Inc. Woburn, MA). Equal nanomolar amounts of libraries were mixed prior to loading on to the sequencer.

Next Generation Sequencing was performed by the UAB Heflin Center Genomics Core using the Illumina NextSeq. 500 (100 Gb/flowcell) Sequencing Platform setup to capture 75 base pairs (bp), paired end sequences (for endoneurial microvessels) and 50 bp, paired end sequences (for pHEndECs), as per the manufacturer’s standard protocols (Illumina Inc. San Diego CA). Quality (Q) Scores (prediction of base calling error probability from the sequencer) were determined for each base pair from each sample (in duplicate). Sequence alignment was performed using STAR program referenced to Genome Reference Consortium Human Reference 37 (hg19). Transcript annotation was performed using PANTHER (http://www.pantherdb.org/)57.

Transcript analyses

Transcript quantification for the P3 and P8 pHEndECs, and the laser-capture microdissected endoneurial microvessels from four normal adult sural nerve biopsies was performed using Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million (FPKM). FPKMs were generated using Cufflinks and Cuffdiff software programs58. Guided by currently known transcript or protein expression at the human BNB in vitro or in situ 4,7,17,24,27,28,30,32,35,37,59, a detection threshold of FPKM >0.1 was set to identify expressed transcripts. Transcripts with FPKM ≤0.1 were defined as no expression and transcripts with zero FPKM in all samples were removed.

The in vitro BNB (IVBNB) was defined as transcripts expressed by both P3 and P8 pHEndECs. The in situ BNB (ISBNB) was defined as transcripts expressed in at least 3 out of 4 adult sural nerve biopsy laser-capture microdissected endoneurial microvessel samples. The human BNB transcriptome was defined as transcripts expressed by both the IVBNB and ISBNB. These common transcripts should exclude pericyte, Schwann cell, fibroblast, leukocyte and axonal transcripts that may contaminate early passage pHEndECs or laser-capture microdissected endoneurial microvessels. To identify possible transcripts expressed by the human BNB in situ that may be lost with pHEndEC culture, transcripts expressed by the ISBNB and P3 pHEndECs were also identified. The average IVBNB and ISBNB FPKMs for each transcript was used for hierarchical clustering. Transcript overlaps between the P3 and P8 pHEndECs, and the IVBNB and ISBNB were generated using custom scripts. Cluster 3.0 and JAVA Treeview software packages were used for hierarchical clustering and heatmap generation respectively60,61.

The human BNB transcriptome functional classification was performed using PANTHER. This program performs pathway enrichment analyses referenced to GO ontology and utilizes Fisher’s one-tailed test (also known as cumulative hypergeometric probability) with its specific multiple testing correction algorithm (g:SCS) to determine the probability that genes associated by a specific network/subnetwork occur by random chance. Lower p-values are generally indicative of higher odds that the assigned association is important and reveals relevant biological information. Statistical significance is set at p ≤ 0.05. Pie charts and bar histograms were generated to demonstrate BNB biological function, cellular component and protein class GO-terms distribution and quantity62. Lists of transporters, junctional complex components and chemokines/chemokine receptors expressed by the human BNB were generated by referencing PANTHER generated functional classification lists based on gene ID against the database of all identified human BNB transcripts and recently published references on these gene subfamilies to ensure completeness46,63,64,65,66,67,68,69.

Transcript expression validation

Validation of transcript expression by the deduced human BNB was performed in situ by indirect fluorescent immunohistochemistry on 10 μm thick cryostat sections of a histologically normal cryopreserved sural nerve biopsy from a 44 year old woman using an array of 31 adhesion, cell membrane, chemokine receptor, cytoskeletal, junctional complex (including adherens, gap and tight junctions and their adapters), secreted and transporter proteins with mean transcript FPKM values varying between 0.8 and 750.5 in situ and 0.4 and 3012.4 in vitro (Table 1).

Table 1 Human Blood-Nerve Barrier Transcriptome validation antibodies.

Consecutive 10 μmthick axial cryostat sections were fixed in acetone at −20 °C for 5 minutes, washed with 1X Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and air-dried at room temperature for 5 minutes prior to blocking with 10% normal goat serum (NGS) in 1X PBS for 30 minutes. Without washing, each slide was incubated with a single primary antibody diluted in 2% NGS in 1X PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Following washing, slides were incubated with either goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) Alexa Fluor® 594 conjugate (Catalog # A-11005, Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA: 4 μg/mL) or goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) Alexa Fluor® 594 conjugate (Catalog #A-11037, Life technologies: 4 μg/mL) with UEA-1-FITC (Catalog # L9006, Sigma-Aldrich, 10 μg/mL) in 2% NGS in 1X PBS for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark. Following a final wash, all sections were stained with 0.45 μM 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 5 minutes to detect nuclei and mounted with ProLong® Gold antifade mounting medium (Life technologies, Catalog # P36934). Digital photomicrographs were taken using an Eclipse Ci-S Upright epifluorescent microscope with a D5-Qi2 camera (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY) and merged using the Nikon Elements software.

Data and materials availability

The human blood-nerve barrier transcriptome data (including Supplementary Data file S3) have been deposited in National Center for Biotechnology Information's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE107574 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE107574). pHEndECs may be obtained through an MTA. Detailed isolation protocols have been previously published.

References

  1. 1.

    Reina, M. A., Lopez, A., Villanueva, M. C., de Andres, J. A. & Leon, G. I. [Morphology of peripheral nerves, their sheaths, and their vascularization]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 47, 464–475 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Reina, M. A., Lopez, A., Villanueva, M. C., De Andres, J. A. & Maches, F. [The blood-nerve barrier in peripheral nerves]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 50, 80–86 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mizisin, A. P. & Weerasuriya, A. Homeostatic regulation of the endoneurial microenvironment during development, aging and in response to trauma, disease and toxic insult. Acta neuropathologica 121, 291–312, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-010-0783-x (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ubogu, E. E. The molecular and biophysical characterization of the human blood-nerve barrier: current concepts. J Vasc Res 50, 289–303, https://doi.org/10.1159/000353293 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Reinhold, A. K. & Rittner, H. L. Barrier function in the peripheral and central nervous system-a review. Pflugers Arch 469, 123–134, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-016-1920-8 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Olsson, Y. Microenvironment of the peripheral nervous system under normal and pathological conditions. Crit Rev Neurobiol 5, 265–311 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yosef, N., Xia, R. H. & Ubogu, E. E. Development and characterization of a novel human in vitro blood-nerve barrier model using primary endoneurial endothelial cells. Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology 69, 82–97, https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181c84a9a (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Olsson, Y. Studies on vascular permeability in peripheral nerves. I. Distribution of circulating fluorescent serum albumin in normal, crushed and sectioned rat sciatic nerve. Acta neuropathologica 7, 1–15 (1966).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Olsson, Y. Topographical differences in the vascular permeability of the peripheral nervous system. Acta neuropathologica 10, 26–33 (1968).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Olsson, Y. Studies on vascular permeability in peripheral nerves. IV. Distribution of intravenously injected protein tracers in the peripheral nervous system of various species. Acta neuropathologica 17, 114–126 (1971).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hultstrom, D., Malmgren, L., Gilstring, D. & Olsson, Y. FITC-Dextrans as tracers for macromolecular movements in the nervous system. A freeze-drying method for dextrans of various molecular sizes injected into normal animals. Acta neuropathologica 59, 53–62 (1983).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Poduslo, J. F., Curran, G. L. & Berg, C. T. Macromolecular permeability across the blood-nerve and blood-brain barriers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 5705–5709 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hamilton, N. B., Attwell, D. & Hall, C. N. Pericyte-mediated regulation of capillary diameter: a component of neurovascular coupling in health and disease. Front Neuroenergetics 2, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00005 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Aird, W. C. Phenotypic heterogeneity of the endothelium: I. Structure, function, and mechanisms. Circulation research 100, 158–173, https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000255691.76142.4a (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Aird, W. C. Phenotypic heterogeneity of the endothelium: II. Representative vascular beds. Circulation research 100, 174–190, https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000255690.03436.ae (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yano, K. et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity is an evolutionarily conserved feature of the endothelium. Blood 109, 613–615, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-05-026401 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bell, M. A. & Weddell, A. G. A descriptive study of the blood vessels of the sciatic nerve in the rat, man and other mammals. Brain: a journal of neurology 107(Pt 3), 871–898 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Latker, C. H., Shinowara, N. L., Miller, J. C. & Rapoport, S. I. Differential localization of alkaline phosphatase in barrier tissues of the frog and rat nervous systems: a cytochemical and biochemical study. J Comp Neurol 264, 291–302, https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902640302 (1987).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Murphy, H. S., Bakopoulos, N., Dame, M. K., Varani, J. & Ward, P. A. Heterogeneity of vascular endothelial cells: differences in susceptibility to neutrophil-mediated injury. Microvasc Res 56, 203–211, https://doi.org/10.1006/mvre.1998.2110 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Orte, C., Lawrenson, J. G., Finn, T. M., Reid, A. R. & Allt, G. A comparison of blood-brain barrier and blood-nerve barrier endothelial cell markers. Anat Embryol (Berl) 199, 509–517 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Allt, G. & Lawrenson, J. G. The blood-nerve barrier: enzymes, transporters and receptors–a comparison with the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res Bull 52, 1–12 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Potente, M. & Makinen, T. Vascular heterogeneity and specialization in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.36 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bosetti, F. et al. “Small Blood Vessels: Big Health Problems?”: Scientific Recommendations of the National Institutes of Health Workshop. J Am Heart Assoc 5, https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004389 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Ubogu, E. E. Inflammatory neuropathies: pathology, molecular markers and targets for specific therapeutic intervention. Acta neuropathologica 130, 445–468, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1466-4 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yosef, N. & Ubogu, E. E. An immortalized human blood-nerve barrier endothelial cell line for in vitro permeability studies. Cellular and molecular neurobiology 33, 175–186, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-012-9882-7 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yosef, N. & Ubogu, E. E. alpha(M)beta(2)-integrin-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 interactions drive the flow-dependent trafficking of Guillain-Barre syndrome patient derived mononuclear leukocytes at the blood-nerve barrier in vitro. J Cell Physiol 227, 3857–3875, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.24100 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yosef, N. & Ubogu, E. E. GDNF restores human blood-nerve barrier function via RET tyrosine kinase-mediated cytoskeletal reorganization. Microvasc Res 83, 298–310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2012.01.005 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Reddy, C. L., Yosef, N. & Ubogu, E. E. VEGF-A165 potently induces human blood-nerve barrier endothelial cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and wound healing in vitro. Cellular and molecular neurobiology 33, 789–801, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-013-9946-3 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dong, C. et al. Fibronectin connecting segment-1 peptide inhibits pathogenic leukocyte trafficking and inflammatory demyelination in experimental models of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Exp Neurol 292, 35–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.02.012 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Abe, M. et al. Establishment and characterization of human peripheral nerve microvascular endothelial cell lines: a new in vitro blood-nerve barrier (BNB) model. Cell Struct Funct 37, 89–100 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kanda, T., Iwasaki, T., Yamawaki, M. & Ikeda, K. Isolation and culture of bovine endothelial cells of endoneurial origin. Journal of neuroscience research 49, 769–777, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19970915)49:6<769::AID-JNR11>3.0.CO;2-N (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shimizu, F. et al. Peripheral nerve pericytes modify the blood-nerve barrier function and tight junctional molecules through the secretion of various soluble factors. J Cell Physiol 226, 255–266, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22337 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kanda, T. Biology of the blood-nerve barrier and its alteration in immune mediated neuropathies. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 84, 208–212, https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-302312 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Smith, C. E., Atchabahian, A., Mackinnon, S. E. & Hunter, D. A. Development of the blood-nerve barrier in neonatal rats. Microsurgery 21, 290–297 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Pummi, K. P., Heape, A. M., Grenman, R. A., Peltonen, J. T. & Peltonen, S. A. Tight junction proteins ZO-1, occludin, and claudins in developing and adult human perineurium. J Histochem Cytochem 52, 1037–1046, https://doi.org/10.1369/jhc.3A6217.2004 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sano, Y. et al. Endothelial cells constituting blood-nerve barrier have highly specialized characteristics as barrier-forming cells. Cell Struct Funct 32, 139–147 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Muona, P., Jaakkola, S., Salonen, V. & Peltonen, J. Expression of glucose transporter 1 in adult and developing human peripheral nerve. Diabetologia 36, 133–140 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Froehner, S. C., Davies, A., Baldwin, S. A. & Lienhard, G. E. The blood-nerve barrier is rich in glucose transporter. J Neurocytol 17, 173–178 (1988).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Harik, S. I., Kalaria, R. N., Andersson, L., Lundahl, P. & Perry, G. Immunocytochemical localization of the erythroid glucose transporter: abundance in tissues with barrier functions. J Neurosci 10, 3862–3872 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Holthofer, H. et al. Ulex europaeus I lectin as a marker for vascular endothelium in human tissues. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 47, 60–66 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Steck, A. J., Kinter, J. & Renaud, S. Differential gene expression in nerve biopsies of inflammatory neuropathies. Journal of the peripheral nervous system: JPNS 16(Suppl 1), 30–33, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8027.2011.00302.x (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nolan, D. J. et al. Molecular signatures of tissue-specific microvascular endothelial cell heterogeneity in organ maintenance and regeneration. Dev Cell 26, 204–219, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2013.06.017 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chiang, S. & Ubogu, E. E. The role of chemokines in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Muscle & nerve 48, 320–330, https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23829 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Yagi, T. Clustered protocadherin family. Dev Growth Differ 50(Suppl 1), S131–140, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169X.2008.00991.x (2008).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Belousov, A. B., Fontes, J. D., Freitas-Andrade, M. & Naus, C. C. Gap junctions and hemichannels: communicating cell death in neurodevelopment and disease. BMC Cell Biol 18, 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-016-0120-x (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bachelerie, F. et al. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. [corrected]. LXXXIX. Update on the extended family of chemokine receptors and introducing a new nomenclature for atypical chemokine receptors. Pharmacol Rev 66, 1–79, https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.113.007724 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chen, Z. et al. Characterising the expression and function of CCL28 and its corresponding receptor, CCR10, in RA pathogenesis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 74, 1898–1906, https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204530 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Waehre, A. et al. Lack of chemokine signaling through CXCR5 causes increased mortality, ventricular dilatation and deranged matrix during cardiac pressure overload. PloS one 6, e18668, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018668 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Clark, A. K., Staniland, A. A. & Malcangio, M. Fractalkine/CX3CR1 signalling in chronic pain and inflammation. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 12, 1707–1714 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ubogu, E. E. Chemokine receptors as specific anti-inflammatory targets in peripheral nerves. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 11, 141–153 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Rojas, R. & Apodaca, G. Immunoglobulin transport across polarized epithelial cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3, 944–955, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm972 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Murfee, W. L., Skalak, T. C. & Peirce, S. M. Differential arterial/venous expression of NG2 proteoglycan in perivascular cells along microvessels: identifying a venule-specific phenotype. Microcirculation 12, 151–160, https://doi.org/10.1080/10739680590904955 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Park, T. I. et al. Cultured pericytes from human brain show phenotypic and functional differences associated with differential CD90 expression. Sci Rep 6, 26587, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26587 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kubota, Y. et al. Isolation and function of mouse tissue resident vascular precursors marked by myelin protein zero. The Journal of experimental medicine 208, 949–960, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20102187 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ochiya, T., Takenaga, K. & Endo, H. Silencing of S100A4, a metastasis-associated protein, in endothelial cells inhibits tumor angiogenesis and growth. Angiogenesis 17, 17–26, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-013-9372-7 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Mojsilovic-Petrovic, J., Nesic, M., Pen, A., Zhang, W. & Stanimirovic, D. Development of rapid staining protocols for laser-capture microdissection of brain vessels from human and rat coupled to gene expression analyses. J Neurosci Methods 133, 39–48 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Mi, H., Muruganujan, A., Casagrande, J. T. & Thomas, P. D. Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. Nat Protoc 8, 1551–1566, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.092 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ghosh, S. & Chan, C. K. Analysis of RNA-Seq Data Using TopHat and Cufflinks. Methods Mol Biol 1374, 339–361, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3167-5_18 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Dong, C., Palladino, S. P., Helton, E. S. & Ubogu, E. E. The pathogenic relevance of alphaM-integrin in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Acta neuropathologica 132, 739–752, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1599-0 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    de Hoon, M. J., Imoto, S., Nolan, J. & Miyano, S. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics 20, 1453–1454, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth078 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Saldanha, A. J. Java Treeview–extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20, 3246–3248, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth349 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Mi, H., Muruganujan, A. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res 41, D377–386, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1118 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Komarova, Y. & Malik, A. B. Regulation of endothelial permeability via paracellular and transcellular transport pathways. Annu Rev Physiol 72, 463–493, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135833 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Dejana, E. & Orsenigo, F. Endothelial adherens junctions at a glance. J Cell Sci 126, 2545–2549, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.124529 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Balda, M. S. & Matter, K. Tight junctions as regulators of tissue remodelling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 42, 94–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2016.05.006 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Oldenburg, J. & de Rooij, J. Mechanical control of the endothelial barrier. Cell Tissue Res 355, 545–555, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-013-1792-6 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Nalecz, K. A. Solute Carriers in the Blood-Brain Barier: Safety in Abundance. Neurochem Res 42, 795–809, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-016-2030-x (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Mahringer, A. & Fricker, G. ABC transporters at the blood-brain barrier. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 12, 499–508, https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2016.1168804 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Girardin, F. Membrane transporter proteins: a challenge for CNS drug development. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 8, 311–321 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to past members of the Neuromuscular Immunopathology Research Laboratory at Baylor College of Medicine involved with pHEndEC isolation, culture and characterization, and past/ current members of the Shin J Oh Muscle and Nerve Histopathology Laboratory involved in sural nerve processing and cryopreservation. This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant number R01 NS075212 and institutional funds from the University of Alabama at Birmingham. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The funding sources had no involvement in the conduct of the research, manuscript preparation, data collection/ analyses or decision to submit this work for publication.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.E.U., S.P.P., E.S.H. and C.D. designed the experiments. The experiments were performed by C.D. (sural nerve cryostat sectioning and indirect immunohistochemistry), S.P.P. and E.S.H. (fluorescent endothelium staining, laser-capture microdissection and RNA isolation), E.E.U. (pHEndEC culture and RNA isolation), M.R.C. (RNA concentration, generation of cDNA libraries, High sensitivity electropherograms and RNA Sequencing). Bioinformatics and data analyses were performed by P.J. and D.K.C. (library alignment, Q scores, transcript annotation and quantification, hierarchical clustering, heat map generation and functional classification). E.E.U. was responsible for data validation, interpretation and cross-referencing. E.E.U., S.P.P., E.S.H., C.D. and P.J. wrote the manuscript. S.P.P., E.S.H., P.J., C.D., M.R.C., D.K.C. and E.E.U. critically reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eroboghene E. Ubogu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

E.E.U. receives royalties from Baylor Licensing Group for simian virus-40 large T-antigen immortalized human endoneurial endothelial cells (commercially available through a non-exclusive license) and from Springer Science + Business Media for an edited book on laboratory protocols that describes a flow-dependent in vitro BNB assay. None of the other authors have any conflicts of interest pertaining to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palladino, S.P., Helton, E.S., Jain, P. et al. The Human Blood-Nerve Barrier Transcriptome. Sci Rep 7, 17477 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17475-y

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing