Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Automated Interpretation and Extraction of Topographic Information from Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Data

Abstract

Time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) is a powerful surface-sensitive characterization tool allowing the imaging of chemical properties over a wide range of organic and inorganic material systems. This technique allows precise studies of chemical composition with sub-100-nm lateral and nanometer depth spatial resolution. However, comprehensive interpretation of ToF-SIMS results is challenging because of the very large data volume and high dimensionality. Furthermore, investigation of samples with pronounced topographical features is complicated by systematic and measureable shifts in the mass spectrum. In this work we developed an approach for the interpretation of the ToF-SIMS data, based on the advanced data analytics. Along with characterization of the chemical composition, our approach allows extraction of the sample surface morphology from a time of flight registration technique. This approach allows one to perform correlated investigations of surface morphology, biological function, and chemical composition of Arabidopsis roots.

Introduction

Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) allows direct investigation of local chemical composition in a wide range of organic and inorganic material systems1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. Within complex biological systems, ToF-SIMS, co-registered with techniques like atomic force microscopy, enables the observation of chemical changes in concert with changes in morphology and physical properties. In ToF-SIMS, the sample surface is bombarded by a primary focused ion beam, (e.g. Bi+) which causes a collision cascade in the top surface layer, yielding11,12 charged particles and clusters, which is then accelerated by a uniform electric field into a time-of-flight detector. At the detection stage, each element is represented by a peak with corresponding mass-to-charge ratio m/z, comprising a mass spectrum13. These focused ion beam measurements enable chemical composition studies in 2D and 3D, with sub-100 nm lateral resolution14,15, and monolayer sensitivity with the aid of an additional sputtering source.

ToF-SIMS data interpretation can be challenging, as acquired datasets are multidimensional, with multiple mass spectra measured along 2 or 3-dimensional grids. The total number of spectra can easily exceed 1 million for modern ToF-SIMS instruments with each spectrum consisting of multiple peaks, corresponding to a certain element or a molecular cluster. Additionally, these multidimensional datasets are often collected from samples having pronounced topographical features, which can introduce significant peak shifts that further confound automated data analysis16,17,18. Standard data analysis techniques typically involve simply finding the areas under manually selected peaks (based on prior knowledge of sample composition, or derived from an averaged spectrum), with the area of these peaks serving as a primary quantity for spatial signal mapping. However, these types of approaches have drawbacks, and there are better statistical methodologies where large quantities of data can be considered an asset. Using classical methods can result in crucial information loss if certain peaks have not been selected or detected. Secondly, averaging, or individual peak processing, precludes recovery of elemental spatial correlation. Therefore, if one does not treat the data set as a whole, then element coexistence needs to be checked manually through tedious comparison of multiple elemental maps and their spatial distribution.

An example of an alternative approach to data analysis can be realized by utilizing multivariate analysis (MVA) tools, consisting of supervised, or unsupervised machine learning. To date, these tools have been successfully applied for investigation and interpretation of scanning probe microscopy19,20,21, confocal-Raman spectroscopy22,23,24, ToF-SIMS25,26,27,28,29,30,31 and other data32,33,34. To take advantage of MVA, experimental data is converted into a set of mathematical vectors in a multidimensional space. In ToF-SIMS, a vector can be represented by a mass spectrum collected at a spatial point, or a voxel. However, the sheer number of spectral points in the raw mass spectrum, makes performing MVA of ToF-SIMS computationally intensive. To overcome this issue, coarse data pre-processing by binning28 (with bin width up to 1 u) or analysis of the preselected peaks of interest27 can ameliorate the processing load. However, these types of approaches suffer from a possible loss of spectral information, where the data pretreatment can significantly alter the final results.

In this work, we develop an approach for comprehensive interpretation of multidimensional ToF-SIMS data by utilizing multivariate statistical analysis and applying this approach to a challenging problem in biological imaging. Here, an Arabidopsis thaliana seedling root, which is non-planar and chemically complex, is analyzed by ToF-SIMS. We prepare the data using an automated data compression approach, retaining pertinent information without loss in spectral resolution. These data are processed further using principal component analysis (PCA), to identify regions of fundamentally different chemical compositions. Furthermore, our early results indicated a significant deleterious influence of the sample surface topography on the final mass spectra, which led to significant shift of the mass peaks and thus hampered automated data analysis. Therefore, we also present a theoretical framework to circumvent the error associated with secondary ion trajectories originating at different sample heights. This universal approach allows robust shift correction, and enables qualitative topography reconstruction solely from the ToF-SIMS data.

Experiment and results

We have chosen an Arabidopsis root immobilized and dried on a SiO2 substrate as our sample. The complex chemical composition of a growing root is expected to vary along the length of the root, reflecting different stages of root development, as well as across the root, reflecting differences between the inner and outer portions of the root. Moreover, the sample curvature, associated with the cylindrical architecture of the root, presents an interesting model system to address the challenges associated with assembling and analyzing data from samples with significant topographical complexity. ToF-SIMS measurements were performed using ToF.SIMS5 (IONTOF, Germany) mass spectrometer with a focused bismuth liquid metal ion gun as the ionization source, and cesium sputtering ion gun for sample cleaning and depth profiling. Vacuum level inside the chamber was around 5 × 10−9 mbar during the measurements. An averaged mass spectrum is shown in Fig. 1a. Chemical species common to biological systems, such as Na+, Mg+, K+ , and Ca+, as well as Si+ from the substrate and some small molecules with masses around 150–300 u are evident in these data. Although the measurements were performed in the positive ion detection mode, we were able to track some negative ions using peaks of the clusters formed with the sputtering Cs+ ions (e.g. Cs2O+, Cs2OH+, CNCs2 +, Cs2Cl+). These species are also shown in the averaged mass spectrum. We intentionally excluded pronounced peaks of Cs+ and Cs2 + ions, as these are injected artificially into the sample. To study the spatial distribution of chemical species, the normalized area of selected peaks are plotted as a function of the spatial coordinates (Fig. 1b–f). Obviously, this approach for data interpretation is significantly limited by the characterization of the separate elements/peaks, while comprehensive analysis of the whole spectrum (more than 30 peaks clearly seen by eye) is impossible without statistical tools.

Figure 1
figure1

Classical approach to analysis of the ToF-SIMS data of the Arabidopsis root. (a) Averaged mass spectrum of Arabidopsis root. (bf) Maps of the spatial distribution of elements, as specified in the figure.

Alternative MVA analysis of the ToF-SIMS data can be represented as a classical problem of dimensionality reduction, where vectors in the multidimensional space (individual ToF-SIMS mass spectra) are deconvoluted as a linear combination of a smaller number of eigenvectors, or endmembers. We use principal component analysis, (PCA) for the analysis of these data. However, processing the raw mass spec data is time consuming, as the length of the raw spectrum exceeds a million samples (100 μs of acquisition in the point with 50 ps time resolution) and as a consequence, the computational time is large. To resolve this issue, we developed an automated approach of spectrum compression without loss in spectral resolution. We start with an averaged mass spectrum (Fig. 1a) as a reference to identify mass segments corresponding to a useful signal defined as the total number of counts exceeding a preset threshold. This effectively reduces the overall number of data points, capturing only the useful, interpretable data. The original data is never altered, so the processes can be repeated with different count threshold values. Figure 2a illustrates the post-processed mass spectrum, plotted against a physically meaningless point index. The reader may note that the spectrum now contains 1000–2000 data points, making computation time reasonable. Figure 2b serves as a mass calibration map, assigning the point index to an actual m/z value. We used a count threshold level of 500 to 1000 counts, which roughly corresponds to a single ion detected in 65 spatial points, which is relatively speaking a very low value. Though this data representation may be considered more difficult for understanding and visual representation, it significantly increases the speed of MVA processing, without significant information loss.

Figure 2
figure2

Data pre-processing for MVA analysis. (a) Shortened mass spectrum. (b) Calibration curve associating point index with actual mass.

To analyze compressed ToF-SIMS data, we further utilize PCA, which allows deconvolution of the mass spectrum into a linear combination of orthogonal eigenvectors, sorted by variance. In PCA the first few eigenvectors can be used to characterize the most salient features, while others mostly contain noise. The authors would like to note, that to make this a robust decision, a Scree plot is analyzed to determine the relative variance of each of the eigenvectors, as well as the overall variance distribution. Loadings, or abundance maps show the contribution of each of the principal components spatially (see Supplemental Materials for detailed information about PCA). Detailed analysis of PCA results performed over the preprocessed SIMS data (Supplemental Materials Fig. S1b) highlighted features mostly related to the sample morphology. Abundance maps of principal components 2–3 clearly show edges and the central part of the root. Simultaneously, close analysis of the corresponding eigenvectors shows characteristic peak shift behavior (positive to negative change for each peak). To confirm this notion, we plot the K+ peaks at three different points on the root surface, as illustrated by the blue, green, and red markers in Fig. 3a. As the reader may see, the data shows a difference of about 0.009 u (~3 ns in time of flight) for the K+ data measured at the central part of the sample as opposed to the sample edge (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3
figure3

Topography induced shift of the mass spectra in time of flight mass spectrometry. (a) 2D map of K + distribution; (b) K+ peaks measured without shift correction in different positions, specified on the map (a).

This peak shift is related to the surface morphology of root, since the height at the edge and the center differ, thus yielding a different time of flight for the same chemical species. The experiment shows a decrease in the time of flight (mass-to-charge ratio) for ions collected from the elevated parts of the root, which is roughly 200 µm taller than the edge. This parasitic effect is well known in the ToF-SIMS community, and it leads to undesirable widening of the mass spectrum peaks16,17,18. Recent studies suggested a number of corrections17. In this work, we considered the origin of this shift and demonstrate an approach to correct for this height effect and also extract sample morphology in the process.

We considered a simplified version of the ToF-SIMS analyzer (Fig. 4a), where ions released from the sample surface are accelerated by the uniform electric field in the gap between the sample and the biased extractor (U ex  = 2 kV). Sample to extractor distance, in our experiments is h ex  = 1.5 mm. In this case, time of the K+ ion acceleration in a homogeneous electric field can be estimated as: \({t}_{ac}=\sqrt{\frac{2{h}_{ex}^{2}{m}_{K}}{{U}_{ex}e}}\approx 30.2\,ns\), where m K is K+ ion mass and e – electron charge, while the total effective traveled path of the ion released from the surface is roughly H ef  = 2 m and total time of flight measured for K+ ions is T K  = 20.545 μs.

Figure 4
figure4

(a) Schematic of the ion motion in ToF-SIMS, (b) K+ peaks at points specified in Fig. 2 after shift correction and (c) Topography of the studied Arabidopsis root sample, calculated from shift of the Cs peak.

From Fig. 4a we can compare two ion paths with the same mass m: (p 1) released from SiO2 substrate and (p 2) released from the root at height Δh above the substrate. We provide a detailed description of the model as well as full mathematical calculations in the Supplemental Materials. Here we will discuss only the most significant conclusions.

At the extractor, the velocity of the ion released from the substrate, \({v}_{ex}(p1)=\sqrt{\frac{2{U}_{ex}e}{m}}\), will be higher than the velocity of the ion released from the root, \({v}_{ex}({\rm{\Delta }}h)={v}_{ex}(p2)\sqrt{\frac{{h}_{ex}-{\rm{\Delta }}h}{{h}_{ex}}}\). This difference will be, however, compensated by the reflectron. On the other hand, the acceleration time spent by the second ions to travel the distance from the root to extractor will also be smaller: \({t}_{ac}({p}_{2})={t}_{ac}({p}_{1})\sqrt{\frac{{h}_{ex}-{\rm{\Delta }}h}{{h}_{ex}}}\). This difference cannot be easily compensated and will result in a topographically induced shift, observed experimentally (Fig. 3b). The total time of flight of the second ion T(p 2) can be calculated using the following expression, given by Equation 1:

$$T({p}_{2})=T({p}_{1})-{t}_{ac}({p}_{1})(1-\sqrt{\frac{{h}_{ex}-{\rm{\Delta }}h}{{h}_{ex}}})$$
(1)

where T(p 1) is total time of flight of the first ion, released from the substrate.

To establish the technique for the shift correction, we also have to consider the ions of different masses m x , starting from height Δh, with the total time of flight T x (Δh) presented in terms of T(0) and T(Δh) by Equation 2:

$${T}_{x}({p}_{2})={T}_{x}({p}_{1})\frac{T({p}_{2})}{T({p}_{1})}$$
(2)

where T x (0) is the time of flight of ion with mass m x released from the substrate.

With equation (2) one can establish a universal correction procedure. One of the peaks in the mass spectrum serves as a reference, which allows the calculation of the correction factor D and its spatial distribution, given by Equation 3:

$$D(x,y)=\frac{{T}_{ref}^{sub}}{{T}_{ref}(x,y)}$$
(3)

here T ref sub is the time of flight of the reference ions, and T ref (x, y) is the time of flight of the reference ion at a spatial point with coordinates (x, y).

The maximal measured time of flight in the dataset can be used as an estimate for T ref sub. In this case, times of flight of all ions (besides the reference) can be corrected by Equation 4:

$$T^{\prime} (x,y)=T(x,y)\times D(x,y)$$
(4)

where T and T′ are uncorrected and corrected times of flight respectively.

Furthermore, the referenced peak position can also be used to quantitatively assess the surface topography, given by Equation 5:

$${\rm{\Delta }}h(x,y)={h}_{ex}(1-{(\frac{{t}_{ac}(0)-{\rm{\Delta }}T(x,y)}{{t}_{ac}(0)})}^{2})$$
(5)

where ΔT(x, y) = T ref sub − T ref (x, y). The value of t ac (0) cannot be directly measured and needs to be estimated using known instrument parameters.

In our work, we used the Cs+ peak as a reference to calculate the correction factor D (Fig. 3c). This peak has been used as it has maximal intensity from collected mass spectra. However, any of the peaks can be used for correction, as demonstrated by theoretical calculations. The final deviation of the K+ ions after the topographic correction did not exceed 1.5×10−4u (Fig. 4b). The estimated topography of the root with a line height profile is shown in Fig. 4c. This approach of topography extraction can be used as a universal technique for ToF-SIMS data interpretation. We expect it to be applicable for surface morphology features from about 10 μm to hundreds on microns. Detection of the smaller features would be problematic due to small values of spectral shift. For instance, K+ time of flight shift for studied sample was around 3 ns, with detection accuracy of 50 ps, which gives minimal detectable feature height of about 5 μm. Measurements of samples with much bigger features will introduce additional problems of non-uniform sputtering and inefficiency of the charge compensation.

Correction of the time of-flight shift allowed us to proceed with data analysis and decouple chemical and topographic channels convoluted in the raw ToF-SIMS data. Corrected data in this case, can be processed using MVA for chemical interpretation. To do this we performed PCA over the corrected dataset (Fig. 4), by utilizing the Bellerophon Environment for Analysis of Materials – BEAM35. BEAM is a computational workflow software, which can be run on a wide range of operating systems. This lightweight application enables access to High Performance Computing (HPC) platforms easy by offering an intuitive graphical-user-interface, a choice of scalable data analysis algorithms, simulation packages, input and output data storage, as well as data sharing capabilities.

In the analysis, the K+ peak, along with Cs+ and Cs2 + peaks have been excluded. The reasons for exclusion of the K+ peak was saturation, seen in the spatial distribution maps. Cs+ and Cs2 + peaks have also been excluded as they originate from the sputtering source and are not expected in the root chemical composition.

To interpret PCA results one should remember that the mass spectrum at each point represents a linear combination of eigenvectors with loading coefficients illustrating the abundance of each of the eigenvectors. Figure 5a are the loading coefficients for PCA eigenvectors 1–6, shown as a function of the point index in Fig. 5b, and the m/z in Fig. 5c. For non-whitened data, the first PCA component is the averaged mass spectrum of the root, without the characteristic Si peaks. The second component, on the other hand, is Si signal dominated, showing highest abundance for Si peaks, (Si+, Si2+, Si2 +, etc.) found outside the root on the substrate (Fig. 5a Comp #2). Component #3 shows regions with higher concentration of K+ and Ca+, while component #5 shows Na+ inclusions. Component #4 demonstrates pronounced peaks with masses above 150 u, corresponded loading map shows regions of the higher concentration of small molecules and clusters. Finally, component #6 is most likely a signature of contamination, which is sparsely distributed over the root and substrate. The distribution of these eigenvectors allows differentiation of background from the sample, and the exciting possibility of distinguishing chemical characteristics that correlate with structural features of the root.

Figure 5
figure5

Principal component analysis of ToF-SIMS data. (a) Abundance maps and (b,c) eigenvectors plot versus (b) point index and (c) mass-to-charge ratio.

It needs to be noted that in the ToF-SIMS instrument, the ion beams are tilted with respect to the sample surface, which may cause inhomogeneity of sputter yields on samples with pronounced surface morphology. The magnitude of this phenomenon is defined by the sample/ions interaction. In the studied case of Arabidopsis, PCA maps as well as topography profile do not show any preferential areas associated with sputtering direction, which demonstrates that shading effect is small. However, in the general case one needs to be aware of possible artifacts caused by the tilt of the ion guns.

Conclusion

In this work we developed an automated approach to comprehensively interpret multidimensional mass spectrometry data based on multivariate analysis. We applied this methodology to characterize a sample of Arabidopsis root, studied with ToF-SIMS. Our raw results show mass spectrum features (i.e. peak shift) related to the surface morphology of the sample, which suppresses the application of multivariate analysis, and yields erroneous results. Therefore, we modeled the travel behavior of the secondary ions inside the ToF-SIMS analyzer. This allowed us to establish a universal correction technique and estimate surface topography of the sample by only using the ToF SIMS data.

Data analysis performed using Principal Component Analysis identified regions along the root with different chemical composition. This demonstrates the opportunity to use ToF-SIMS to correlate chemical characteristics with functional processes on biological samples with complex morphologies. This approach can be used as a basis for universal topography correction in ToF-SIMS data, as well as comprehensive interpretation of the mass spectrometry data in 2- and 3-dimensions.

Methods

Studied samples

In our measurements, we used a biological sample of Arabidopsis root deposited on a SiO2 substrate. Arabidopsis thaliana seeds were purchased from Lehle seeds (PO Box 2366, Round Rock, TX, 78680–23666). Surface sterilization of seeds was accomplished by using either ethanol + Triton × 100 (1 Nelson 2009) or by a combination of ethanol and bleach+1% SDS (2 Choe 2001). The seeds were grown in sterile liquid growth media composed of 1.1 g of Murashige and Skoog basal Medium with “Vitamins” (3 Murashige and Skoog 1962), 0.5 g MES hydrate (4-Morpholineethanesulfonic acid hydrate) and 2.5 g of sucrose in 1 liter of distilled water. Approximately 20 to 40 sterilized seeds were placed in sterile culture dishes with growth media and placed near a window in the laboratory where the temperature could vary between 22–25 °C. Generally, the seeds would germinate in 2–3 days and would be used in experiments 4–6 days after germination. Arabidopsis root samples 0.5 to 1 cm in length were cut from plants growing in growth media and placed on the SiO2 samples and allowed to dry prior to analysis.

Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

Mass spectrometry measurements were performed in positive ion detection mode using TOF SIMS-5 (ION-TOF GmbH, Germany) with a 30 keV Bi ion gun as the primary source with a focused ion beam spot size of ~5 μm, and a m/Δm resolution of 5000 ÷ 11,000. The imaging was performed across 500 × 500 μm areas of 256 × 256 points with a total acquisition time of 300 s. Cs+ ion-sputtering source operated at 1 keV and 50 nA across 700 × 700 μm area has been used for cleaning of the sample surface during the measurements. Low energy electron flood gun has been used during ToF-SIMS measurements to compensate accumulation of the positive charges on the sample surface.

References

  1. 1.

    Chabala, J. M. et al. High-resolution chemical imaging with scanning ion probe SIMS. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 143, 191–212 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Colliver, T. L. et al. Atomic and molecular imaging at the single-cell level with TOF-SIMS. Anal. Chem. 69, 2225–2231 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pacholski, M. L. & Winograd, N. Imaging with mass spectrometry. Chem. Rev. 99, 2977–3006 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Todd, P. J., Schaaff, T. G., Chaurand, P. & Caprioli, R. M. Organic ion imaging of biological tissue with secondary ion mass spectrometry and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization. J. Mass Spectrom. 36, 355–369 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Belu, A. M., Graham, D. J. & Castner, D. G. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry: techniques and applications for the characterization of biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials 24, 3635–3653 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sjovall, P., Lausmaa, J. & Johansson, B. Mass spectrometric imaging of lipids in brain tissue. Anal. Chem. 76, 4271–4278 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McDonnell, L. A. & Heeren, R. M. A. Imaging mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 26, 606–643 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Krebs, F. C. & Norrman, K. Analysis of the failure mechanism for a stable organic photovoltaic during 10000 h of testing. Prog. Photovoltaics 15, 697–712 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Surratt, J. D. et al. Organosulfate formation in biogenic secondary organic aerosol. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 8345–8378 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ievlev, A. V. et al. Chemical state evolution in ferroelectric films during tip-induced polarization and electroresistive switching. ACS Appl. Matt. Interf. 8, 29588–29593 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Delcorte, A., Segda, B. G., Garrison, B. J. & Bertrand, P. Inferring ejection distances and a surface energy profile in keV particle bombardment experiments. Nucl. Intrum. Meth. B 171, 277–290 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rickman, R. D., Verkhoturov, S. V. & Schweikert, E. A. Cluster secondary ion mass spectrometry: an insight into “super-efficient” collision cascades. Appl. Surf. Sci. 231–232, 54–58 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Radionova, A., Filippov, I. & Derrick, P. J. In pursuit of resolution in time-of-flight mass spectrometry: A historical perspective. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 35, 738–757 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Slodzian, G. et al. Scanning secondary ion analytical microscopy with parallel detection. Biol. Cell 74, 43–50 (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kleinfeld, A. M., Kampf, J. P. & Lechene, C. Transport of 13C-oleate in adipocytes measured using multi imaging mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr. 15, 1572–1580 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pachuta, S. J. & Vlasak, P. R. Postacquisition Mass Resolution Improvement in Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 84, 1744–1753 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    McDonnell, L. A. et al. Using Matrix Peaks To Map Topography:  Increased Mass Resolution and Enhanced Sensitivity in Chemical Imaging. Anal. Chem. 75, 4373–4381 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ziegler, G. & Hutter, H. Correction of topographic artefacts of ToF-SIMS element distributions. Surf. Interface Anal. 45, 457–460 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jesse, S. & Kalinin, S. V. Principal component and spatial correlation analysis of spectroscopic-imaging data in scanning probe microscopy. Nanotechnology 20, 085714 (2009).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ievlev, A. V. & Kalinin, S. V. Data encoding based on the shape of the ferroelectric domains produced by using a scanning probe microscope tip. Nanoscale 7, 11040–11047 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Somnath, S., Belianinov, A., Kalinin, S. V. & Jesse, S. Full information acquisition in piezoresponse force microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 263102 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ievlev, A. V. et al. Quantitative Analysis of the Local Phase Transitions Induced by Laser Heating. ACS Nano 9, 12442–12450 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Iberi, V. et al. Graphene engineering by neon ion beams. Nanotechnology 27 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Strelcov, E. et al. Local coexistence of VO2 phases revealed by deep data analysis. Sci. Rep. 6, 29216 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Park, J. W. et al. Multivariate analysis of ToF-SIMS data for biological applications. Surf. Interface Anal. 41, 694–703 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cumpson, P. J. et al. Multivariate analysis of extremely large ToFSIMS imaging datasets by a rapid PCA method. Surf. Interface Anal. 47, 986–993 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wagner, M. S. & Castner, D. G. Characterization of adsorbed protein films by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry with principal component analysis. Langmuir 17, 4649–4660 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Biesinger, M. C. et al. Principal component analysis of TOF-SIMS images of organic monolayers. Anal. Chem. 74, 5711–5716 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Graham, D. J., Castner, D. G. Multivariate Analysis of ToF-SIMS Data from Multicomponent Systems: The Why, When, and How. Biointerphases 7 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Smentkowski, V. S. et al. Multivariate statistical analysis of three-spatial-dimension TOF-SIMS raw data sets. Anal. Chem. 79, 7719–7726 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kopriva, I. & Jeric, I. Multi-component analysis: blind extraction of pure components mass spectra using sparse component analysis. J. Mass Spectrom. 44, 1378–1388 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bonnet, N. Multivariate statistical methods for the analysis of microscope image series: applications in materials science. J. Microsc.-Oxford 190, 2–18 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bonnet, N. Artificial intelligence and pattern recognition techniques in microscope image processing and analysis. Hawkes, P. W., Ed. Elsevier Academic Press Inc: San Diego, 2000, Vol. 114, pp 1–77.

  34. 34.

    Bosman, M., Watanabe, M., Alexander, D. T. L. & Keast, V. J. Mapping chemical and bonding information using multivariate analysis of electron energy-loss spectrum images. Ultramicroscopy 106, 1024–1032 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lingerfelt, E. J. et al. BEAM: A computational workflow system for managing and modeling material characterization data in HPCenvironments. Procedia Comp. Sci. 80, 2276–2280 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences and the Office of Biological and Environmental Research under contract number DE-AC05-00OR22725. ToF-SIMS measurements are performed at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.V.I. has obtained the experimental data and developed theory of topography extraction and correction. B.A. and S.J. developed codes for ToF-SIMS data analysis using BEAM. D.A., M.D. and S.R. prepared Arabidopsis root samples. S.K. and O.S.O. directed research. All authors contributed in the writing of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton V. Ievlev.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ievlev, A.V., Belianinov, A., Jesse, S. et al. Automated Interpretation and Extraction of Topographic Information from Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Data. Sci Rep 7, 17099 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17049-y

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing