Article | Open | Published:

# Hydrogen mobility in the lightest reversible metal hydride, LiBeH3

## Abstract

Lithium-beryllium metal hydrides, which are structurally related to their parent compound, BeH2, offer the highest hydrogen storage capacity by weight among the metal hydrides (15.93 wt. % of hydrogen for LiBeH3). Challenging synthesis protocols have precluded conclusive determination of their crystallographic structure to date, but here we analyze directly the hydrogen hopping mechanisms in BeH2 and LiBeH3 using quasielastic neutron scattering, which is especially sensitive to single-particle dynamics of hydrogen. We find that, unlike its parent compound BeH2, lithium-beryllium hydride LiBeH3 exhibits a sharp increase in hydrogen mobility above 265 K, so dramatic that it can be viewed as melting of hydrogen sublattice. We perform comparative analysis of hydrogen jump mechanisms observed in BeH2 and LiBeH3 over a broad temperature range. As microscopic diffusivity of hydrogen is directly related to its macroscopic kinetics, a transition in LiBeH3 so close to ambient temperature may offer a straightforward and effective mechanism to influence hydrogen uptake and release in this very lightweight hydrogen storage compound.

## Introduction

Metal hydrides have several attractive features as hydrogen storage media, such as high volumetric storage density and high cycling capability, but improving their gravimetric storage density remains a challenge. In search for the reversible metal hydrides with hydrogen gravimetric storage density exceeding that of MgH2 (7.65 wt. %), one has to turn to hydrides of beryllium, since the hydride of monovalent sodium, NaH, has a lower hydrogen weight storage capacity compared to that of MgH2, and lithium hydride, LiH, is practically irreversible1. Beryllium hydride, BeH2 (18.28 wt. % of hydrogen), is a parent compound for a class of complex lithium-beryllium hydrides, the most promising of which, LiBeH3, has 15.93 wt. % of hydrogen. Despite the great promise for reversible hydrogen storage, synthesis of BeH2 and the derivative lithium-beryllium compounds is so cumbersome that to date their crystallographic analysis has been beset with difficulties and remains inconclusive, even though they have been and continue to be studied extensively to better understand their phase behavior2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. It is believed that the parent structure of BeH2 consists of corner-sharing BeH4 tetrahedral units13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 and may exhibit polymorphism, similar to various forms of silica. Likewise, LiBeH3 is generally believed to feature BeH4 tetrahedral units21,22, although BeH6 octahedral units have been also proposed to describe its structure23. Various crystallographic group assignments have been proposed for LiBeH3, as described in earlier studies21,22,23,24,25,26,27. The accurate determination of its structure is complicated by unavailability of single crystals and low x-ray scattering power of light atoms, particularly hydrogen. Neutron diffraction studies, which could potentially overcome the latter problem and accurately assess positions occupied by hydrogen atoms in the LiBeH3 structure, would require deuterated compounds. If they could be determined, local structural parameters, such as H-H distances, would be relevant to the microscopic hydrogen diffusion dynamics and ultimately the macroscopic kinetics of hydrogen uptake and release. This applies not only to crystalline, but also amorphous, lithium-beryllium compounds, which are easier to synthesize and might be more suitable for applications. Together with infrared and Raman spectroscopy, inelastic neutron spectroscopy was used in the past to characterize the vibrational dynamics in amorphous beryllium and lithium-beryllium hydrides28. However, a separate measurement would be needed to probe hydrogen diffusivity in these hydrides. Here we investigate momentum transfer dependence of quasielastic neutron scattering (QENS) signal, which is particularly sensitive to single-particle diffusion dynamics of hydrogen due to its large incoherent neutron scattering cross-section, to elucidate the spatial and temporal characteristics of hydrogen diffusion jumps in BeH2 and LiBeH3.

## Results and Discussion

The temperature dependence of the elastic (within the resolution of the spectrometer) neutron intensity is presented in Fig. 1. The data normalized to the lowest measured temperature overlap up to ca. 265 K, when LiBeH3 exhibits a dramatic drop in the elastic intensity. The elastic intensity does not drop to a near-zero value, as would be the case for a complete melting of the sample. Nevertheless, a sudden change in the state of the hydrogen sublattice, which dominates the scattering signal, is evident. The sharpness of the elastic intensity drop is remarkable; it surpasses, e.g., the already rather sharp elastic intensity drop due to the onset of rapid oxygen diffusivity in bismuth oxide above ca. 740 °C underlined by a phase transition to δ-Bi2O3 structure29, while most order-disorder transitions observed in ion conductors are much more gradual. The abrupt transition in the hydrogen sublattice in LiBeH3 is reminiscent of partial melting. To this end, it is of interest to investigate the mechanism of hydrogen hopping in BeH2 and LiBeH3 at various temperatures. Unlike the data presented in Fig. 1, which are completely model-independent, such analysis of microscopic hydrogen diffusivity has to rely on fitting QENS data with a suitable model scattering function. In the simplest case, the model scattering function in QENS is a superposition of Lorentzian terms, where each Lorentzian term in the energy transfer space is a Fourier transformation of the corresponding term in the time space describing exponential decay with time of self-correlation for diffusing particles. For a comprehensive overview of QENS technique and data analysis, see30.

The QENS data, I(Q, E), collected as a function of energy and momentum transfer, E and Q, are fitted with the following model scattering function:

$$I(Q,E)=[x(Q)\delta (E)+(1-x(Q))S(Q,E)]\otimes R(Q,E)+({C}_{1}(Q)E+{C}_{2}(Q))$$
(1)

The fits of the scattering intensity, I(Q, E), are performed separately at each Q value, and include a superposition of elastic line (delta-function) with a spectral weight x(Q) and a quasielastic model scattering function term, S(Q, E), with the complementary spectral weight 1−x(Q), convolved with the resolution function, R(Q, E), and a linear background term, (C1(Q)E + C2(Q)). The model scattering functions used in the current study included either one, or two Lorentzian terms, as follows:

$$S(Q,E)=p(Q)\frac{1}{\pi }\frac{HWHM{(Q)}_{narrow}}{HWH{M}^{2}{(Q)}_{narrow}+{E}^{2}}+(1-p(Q))\frac{1}{\pi }\frac{HWHM{(Q)}_{broad}}{HWH{M}^{2}{(Q)}_{broad}+{E}^{2}}$$
(2)

The drastic difference of the scattering signal from LiBeH3 observed above the transition is illustrated by Fig. 2. A simple one-Lorentzian fits adequately described the data for BeH2 and LiBeH3 below the transition; the resulting Q-dependence of the Lorentzian half-width at half-maximum, HWHM(Q), is presented in Fig. 3. The data for BeH2 exhibit stronger Q-dependence compared to those for LiBeH3. In particular, they show an increase at low Q followed by a weak maximum in the mid-Q range, which suggests that the hydrogen hopping in BeH2 can be described by Chudley-Elliott jump diffusion model30 (Fig. 3a):

$$HWHM(Q)=\frac{6\hslash D}{{L}^{2}}(1-\frac{\sin (QL)}{QL})$$
(3)

where is reduced Planck constant, D is the diffusion coefficient and L is the diffusion jump length. Chudley-Elliott jump diffusion model assumes that, for some characteristic time between jumps, τ, a particle engages only in vibrational motions near an equilibrium position, and then relatively quickly (compared to the time between jumps) performs a diffusion jump into a new equilibrium position. The jump length and diffusion coefficient are related to the characteristic time between jumps, τ, as D = L2/6τ; they are listed in Table 1. The HWHM(Q) values for LiBeH3 below the transition are relatively Q-independent, indicative of localized, rather than long-range translational, hydrogen jumps. They can be described by the values averaged over the measured Q-range, <HWHM(Q)> (Fig. 3b), which can be converted to the characteristic time between jumps as τ = /<HWHM(Q)>. On the other hand, a two-Lorentzian fit was needed to adequately describe the data for LiBeH3 above the transition. The resulting HWHM(Q) of the narrower Lorentzian can still be fitted with Chudley-Elliott jump diffusion model, but the HWHM(Q) of the broader Lorentzian is different in character; while increasing with Q, it lacks a maximum in the mid-Q range (Fig. 4). Thus, it has to be described by a liquid-diffusion model30:

$$HWHM(Q)=\frac{6\hslash D}{ < {L}^{2} > }(1-\frac{1}{1+{Q}^{2} < {L}^{2} > /6})$$
(4)

where the mean squared diffusion jump length < L2 >  = 6Dτ. Liquid-diffusion model (Equation 4) can be derived30 from Chudley-Elliott jump diffusion model (Equation 3) by assuming an exponential distribution of jump lengths, L.

Hydrogen hopping mechanism in LiBeH3 above the transition is highly unusual in that it exhibits characteristic traits of both solid state and liquid diffusion processes. Resemblance to the solid-state diffusion is evident from the fact that the HWHM(Q) for the narrower Lorentzian, which is typically associated with the long-range translational diffusivity, is described by a solid-state Chudley-Elliott jump diffusion model with a well-defined jump length, not a liquid-diffusion model with a distribution of jump lengths. However, resemblance to the liquid diffusion is evidenced by the strongly Q-dependent spectral weight of the narrow Lorentzian (parameter p(Q) in Equation 2), as presented in Fig. 4 inset. Such Q-dependence of the p(Q) indicates that the two observed Lorentzian components originate from the same diffusing entity31,32,33, and not two separate diffusing species; in the latter case, a Q-independent Lorentzian spectral weight would be expected. In liquids, the narrow Lorentzian is associated with the long-range translational diffusivity, whereas the broad Lorentzian is due to the localized center-of-mass motions in the transient cage made by the neighboring liquid particles31,32,33. These localized motions give rise to a broad Q-dependent component, which should, however, plateau at low Q. No leveling off is observed for the broad component presented in Fig. 4, which may indicate that the characteristic volume associated with the localized diffusivity of hydrogen in LiBeH3 above the transition could be too large to be detected within the Q range of our experiment.

The diffusion jump lengths for hydrogen in BeH2 and LiBeH3 above the transition (slow component) presented in Table 1 exhibit rather strong and systematic temperature dependence, consistent with long-range hydrogen diffusivity. On the other hand, the diffusion jump length associated with the localized motions of hydrogen in LiBeH3 above the transition (fast component) does not exhibit a pronounced temperature dependence, as expected for localized motions in the liquid state.

Figure 5 shows Arrhenius plots of the characteristic times between jumps and the long-range diffusion coefficients. The long-range diffusion is not measurable for the localized hydrogen hopping in LiBeH3 below the transition. Furthermore, here we chose not to display the diffusivity values listed in Table 1 for the fast component measured in LiBeH3 above the transition, because of their likely association with localized rather than long-range diffusivity. The activation energy for the long-range translational diffusivity (solid lines in Fig. 5b) is (2.8 ± 0.3) kJ/mol and (13.3 ± 1.1) kJ/mol for BeH2 and LiBeH3, respectively. Likewise, even below the transition, where hydrogen in LiBeH3 engages only in localized hopping, its associated activation energy of the residence times appears much larger compared to that of the residence times for hydrogen in BeH2, as evidenced by much steeper temperature dependence seen at low temperatures in Fig. 5a.

It is unclear as to whether the unusual character of hydrogen hopping in LiBeH3 above the transition is related to the amorphous structure of this hydride. On the one hand, it is tempting to attribute the unusual resemblance of hydrogen mobility in this hydride to both liquid- and solid-state diffusion to the fact that the LiBeH3 structure is amorphous, characterized by the local order and long-range disorder, which can introduce a variety of jump distances. On the other hand, BeH2, which is also amorphous, does not exhibit any sudden transition in the hydrogen mobility. If the amorphous structure of a hydride is indeed essential for the unusual hydrogen hopping mechanism as reported here, there is a possibility that other amorphous compounds derived from BeH2 may exhibit similar mechanism of hydrogen diffusivity, including the transition, if they happen to remain thermodynamically stable to the sufficiently high temperature.

In summary, a sharp increase in the hydrogen mobility observed in LiBeH3 above 265 K is associated with the abrupt transition of the hydrogen sublattice to a peculiar state that exhibits characteristic traits of both solid-like and liquid-like diffusivity. Because this transition is so close to ambient temperature, it can be used as a mechanism to regulate hydrogen diffusivity in LiBeH3. Ultimately, it may help control hydrogen uptake and release in this very lightweight hydrogen storage compound, even though we should note that our QENS measurements were performed in the temperature range of the sample stability, and thus were not directly associated with hydrogen uptake and release.

## Materials and Methods

### Materials

BeH2 and LiBeH3 materials investigated in the current study were the same samples as described in earlier work28, which refers to the materials synthesis procedures. In general, solid BeH2 had primarily been synthesized from decomposition of organometallic precursors34,35,36. This synthesis method typically produces amorphous products, which can be transformed to crystalline phases at elevated pressure and temperature. Pressure is required to keep the solid amorphous BeH2 from decomposing into its elemental constituents. Both BeH2 crystalline phases and the amorphous solid material have been shown to consist of network of corner-sharing BeH4 tetrahedral units17.

### QENS Data Collection and Reduction

Quasielastic neutron scattering (QENS) experiment was carried out using high energy resolution backscattering spectrometer BASIS37 at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The energy resolution was 3.4 μeV (full width at half-maximum) for the Q-averaged resolution value, and the energy transfer window suitable for the data analysis was ±100 μeV. The minimum and maximum momentum transfer, Q, value suitable for data analysis was 0.3 Å−1 and 1.5 Å−1, respectively. The powder samples contained in aluminum foil were placed in annular aluminum sample holders. Initially, each sample was cooled down to the baseline temperature of 20 K to measure the spectra (for several hours each) used for the sample-specific resolution function under the conditions when the measurable hydrogen hopping had ceased. Then the temperature was ramped up at a rate of 1 K/min while the data almost continuously collected for about 5 hours were integrated over ±3.4 μeV energy transfer range to obtain the temperature dependence of the elastically scattered neutron intensity (averaged over all Q values). Then longer dynamic measurements (several hours each) were performed at a few temperatures chosen to remain below the known limits of thermal decomposition38. A vanadium standard was used for data normalization.

### Data Availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Weast, R. C. (Ed.), Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, OH, USA (1975).

2. 2.

Ahart, M. et al. High-pressure Brillouin scattering of amorphous BH2. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 014502, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2138692 (2006).

3. 3.

Harder, S. Molecular early main group metal hydrides: synthetic challenge, structures and applications. Chem. Commun. 48, 11165–11177, https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc33478j (2012).

4. 4.

Chen, Y. et al. Exploring High-Pressure Lithium Beryllium Hydrides: A New Chemical Perspective. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 13879–13886, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp404046g (2013).

5. 5.

Wang, Z. et al. Metallization and superconductivity of BeH2 under high pressure. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 124707, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4869145 (2014).

6. 6.

Zdetsis, A. D., Sigalas, M. M. & Koukaras, E. N. Ab initio theoretical investigation of beryllium and beryllium hydride nanoparticles and nanocrystals with implications for the corresponding infinite systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 14172–14182, https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp01587h (2014).

7. 7.

Pardanaud, C. et al. Hydrogen retention in beryllium: concentration effect and nanocrystalline growth. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 475401, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/27/47/475401 (2015).

8. 8.

Koukaras, E. N., Sgouros, A. P. & Sigalas, M. M. Fully Hydrogenated Beryllium Nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3218–3227, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b00135 (2016).

9. 9.

Guendouz, D. et al. Electronic structure, optical and thermodynamic properties of ternary hydrides MBeH3 (M = Li, Na, and K). Can. J. Phys. 94, 865–876, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2016-0299 (2016).

10. 10.

Pepin, C. M. & Loubeyre, P. Layered structure and re-entrant disproportionation observed in crystalline BeH2 under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 93, 224104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.224104 (2016).

11. 11.

Rehmat, B. et al. Elastic properties of perovskite-type hydrides LiBeH3 and NaBeH3 for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 10038–10046, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.109 (2017).

12. 12.

An, X., Zeng, T. & Ren, W. Structural, electronic and optical properties of BeH2: A density functional theory study. Mater. Res. Express 4, 036302, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/4/3/036302 (2017).

13. 13.

Marchenko, S. V., Petrunin, V. F., Markushkin, Y. E., Senin, M. D. & Chirin, N. A. Neutron scattering study of amorphous beryllium hydride. Fizika Tverdogo Tela 24, 2305–2309 (1982).

14. 14.

Smith, G. S. et al. The crystal and molecular structure of beryllium hydride. Solid State Commun. 67, 491–494, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(84)90168-6 (1988).

15. 15.

Yu, R., Lam, P. K. & Head, J. Lattice dynamics of crystalline beryllium hydride. Solid State Commun. 70, 1043–1046, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(89)90189-0 (1989).

16. 16.

Senin, M. D. et al. The production, structure, and properties of beryllium hydride. Inorg. Mater. 29, 1416–1420 (1993).

17. 17.

Sampath, S. et al. Structural quantum isotope effects in amorphous beryllium hydride. J. Chem. Phys. 119, 12499–12502, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1626638 (2003).

18. 18.

Hector, L. G. Jr., Herbst, J. F., Wolf, W., Saxe, P. & Kresse, G. Ab Initio thermodynamic and elastic properties of alkaline-earth metals and their hydrides. Phys. Rev. B 76, 014121, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.014121 (2007).

19. 19.

Bachurin, D. V. & Vladimirov, P. V. Simulation of hydrogen effect on equilibrium shape of gas bubbles in beryllium. Fusion Eng. Des. 109-111, 1432–1436, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.12.004 (2016).

20. 20.

Virot, F., Ferry, L., Ferro, Y., Pardanaud, C. & Barrachin, M. Contribution to a better evaluation of the dust speciation in case of an accident in ITER. Fusion Eng. Des., in press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.02.102 (2017).

21. 21.

Martins, J. L. Electronic and structural properties of LiBeH3. Phys. Rev. B 38, 12776–12779, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.38.12776 (1988).

22. 22.

Hu, C.-H. et al. Crystal structure prediction of LiBeH3 using ab initio total-energy calculations and evolutionary simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 234105, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3021079 (2008).

23. 23.

Vajeeston, P., Ravindran, P. & Fjellvag, H. Structural Phase Stability Studies on MBeH3 (M = Li,Na,K,Rb,Cs) from Density Functional Calculations. Inorg. Chem. 47, 508–514, https://doi.org/10.1021/ic7015897 (2008).

24. 24.

Overhauser, A. W. Crystal structure of lithium beryllium hydride. Phys. Rev. B 35, 411–414, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.35.411 (1987).

25. 25.

Selvam, P. & Yvon, K. Comment on “Crystal structure of lithium beryllium hydride”. Phys. Rev. B 39, 12329–12330, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.39.12329 (1989).

26. 26.

Cantrell, J. S., Beiter, T. A., Souers, P. C. & Barry, P. Crystallographic studies of compounds from the LiH + BeH2 system. J. Less-Comm. Metals 172–174, 213–219 (1991).

27. 27.

Zaluska, A., Zaluski, L. & Strom-Olsen, J. O. Lithium-beryllium hydrides: the lightest reversible metal hydrides. J. Alloys Cmpnds. 307, 157–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(00)00883-5 (2000).

28. 28.

Sampath, S., Kolesnikov, A. I., Lantzky, K. M. & Yarger, J. L. Vibrational dynamics of amorphous beryllium hydride and lithium beryllium hydrides. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 134512, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2842079 (2008).

29. 29.

Mamontov, E. Fast oxygen diffusion in bismuth oxide probed by quasielastic neutron scattering. Solid State Ionics 296, 158–162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2016.09.022 (2016).

30. 30.

Bee, M. Quasielastic Neutron Scattering, Hilger, Bristol (1988).

31. 31.

Mamontov, E., Luo, H. & Dai, S. Proton Dynamics in N,N,N′,N′-Tetramethyl-Guanidinium Bis(perfluoroethylsulfonyl)imide Protic Ionic Liquid Probed by Quasielastic Neutron Scattering. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 159–169, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp808102k (2009).

32. 32.

Qvist, J., Schober, H. & Halle, B. Structural Dynamics of Supercooled Water from Quasielastic Neutron Scattering and Molecular Simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 144508, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3578472 (2011).

33. 33.

Mamontov, E. Diffusion in confinement as a microscopic relaxation mechanism in glass-forming liquids. Chem. Phys. Lett. 530, 55–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2012.01.073 (2012).

34. 34.

Coates, G. E. & Glocking, F. Diisopropylberyllium and Some Beryllium Hydrides. J. Chem. Soc., 22–27, https://doi.org/10.1039/JR9540000022 (1954).

35. 35.

Coates, G. E. & Glocking, F. Di-tert. -butylberyllium and Beryllium Hydride. J. Chem. Soc., 2526–2529, https://doi.org/10.1039/JR9540002526 (1954).

36. 36.

Baker, R. W. et al. Preparation of Beryllium Hydride by an Improved Pyrolysis Technique. J. Organomet. Chem. 159, 123–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-328X(00)82311-6 (1978).

37. 37.

Mamontov, E. & Herwig, K. W. A Time-of-Flight Backscattering Spectrometer at the Spallation Neutron Source, BASIS. Rev. Sci. Inst. 82, 085109, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3626214 (2011).

38. 38.

Grochala, W. & Edwards, P. P. Thermal Decomposition of the Non-Interstitial Hydrides for the Storage and Production of Hydrogen. Chem. Rev. 104, 1283–1315, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030691s (2004).

## Acknowledgements

Research at the Spallation Neutron Source of Oak Ridge National Laboratory was sponsored by the Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy. We are grateful to K. Lantzky for help with sample synthesis and to C. Brown, V. Garcia Sakai, G. Gasparovic, R. Paul, and M. Tyagi, who helped with sample characterization and preliminary measurements at the NIST Center for Neutron Research, including observations of a sudden transition in the hydrogen sublattice. JLY acknowledges support from DOD-ARO.

## Author information

### Affiliations

1. #### Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA

• Eugene Mamontov
•  & Alexander I. Kolesnikov
2. #### Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA

• Sujatha Sampath
•  & Jeffery L. Yarger

### Contributions

J.L.Y. and S.S. prepared and characterized the samples. A.I.K. conceived the experiment. E.M. conducted the experiment and analyzed the results. All authors prepared the manuscript.

### Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene Mamontov.