Article | Open | Published:

Canonical germinant receptor is dispensable for spore germination in Clostridium botulinum group II strain NCTC 11219

Scientific Reportsvolume 7, Article number: 15426 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Clostridium botulinum is an anaerobic sporeforming bacterium that is notorious for producing a potent neurotoxin. Spores of C. botulinum can survive mild food processing treatments and subsequently germinate, multiply, produce toxin and cause botulism. Control of spore germination and outgrowth is therefore essential for the safety of mildly processed foods. However, little is known about the process of spore germination in group II C. botulinum (gIICb), which are a major concern in chilled foods because they are psychrotrophic. The classical model of spore germination states that germination is triggered by the binding of a germinant molecule to a cognate germinant receptor. Remarkably, unlike many other sporeformers, gIICb has only one predicted canonical germinant receptor although it responds to multiple germinants. Therefore, we deleted the gerBAC locus that encodes this germinant receptor to determine its role in germination. Surprisingly, the deletion did not affect germination by any of the nutrient germinants, nor by the non-nutrient dodecylamine. We conclude that one or more other, so far unidentified, germinant receptors must be responsible for nutrient induced germination in gIICb. Furthermore, the gerBAC locus was strongly conserved with intact open reading frames in 159 gIICb genomes, suggesting that it has nevertheless an important function.

Introduction

Clostridium botulinum is a heterogeneous species of sporeforming, strictly anaerobic bacteria that thrive in decaying organic matter in the soil or in aqueous environments. It is notorious for its ability to produce a potent neurotoxin that can cause botulism, a severe neuroparalytic disease1,2,3. Human botulism is predominantly associated with group I and II C. botulinum (gICb and gIICb), and these groups have therefore been studied most extensively4,5,6. gIICb strains, in particular, are a major concern for the safety of mildly heat-processed refrigerated foods because they are psychrotrophic. Food producers have to ensure that the formulation of the food in combination with the storage conditions prevent multiplication of gIICb during the shelf-life of these foods3,7,8,9,10. Since spore germination necessarily preceeds vegetative cell growth, understanding the spore germination process is essential to accurately predict the probability of toxin formation. In addition, it may pave the way towards novel control strategies aimed at inhibiting or retarding spore germination.

In the natural environment, spore germination is induced when specific nutrients bind to spore germinant receptors (GRs) in the spore membrane, thus signaling that conditions are favorable for outgrowth. This sets off a self-propagating and irreversible cascade of events starting with the release of monovalent cations H+, Na+, K+ and Ca2+-dipicolinic acid (Ca2+-DPA) from the spore core, followed by degradation of the spore cortex and core rehydration. The latter is a key turning point in the spore germination process because it causes the loss of many of the spores’ resistance properties and at the same time triggers the onset of metabolism11,12,13.

The nutrients that trigger germination are species and strain specific, but most commonly include one or more L-amino acids, purine ribosides and D-sugars14. GRs designated as Ger receptors have been first identified in B. subtilis and later shown to be conserved in almost all sporeforming Bacilli and Clostridia. However, the diversity among Ger receptors is large. In B. cereus, a recent study defined 11 different phylogenetic clusters of Ger receptors, with the number of receptors per strain varying from four to ten15. The Ger receptor content is believed to reflect the spectrum of germinants that a strain responds to. In B. subtilis strain 168, for example, GerA responds to D-ala, while GerB and GerK cooperatively respond to a germinant mixture of L-asparagine, D-glucose, fructose and K+. However, the relation between the germination response and the presence of specific Ger receptors is usually more complex, as exemplified by the study of Warda et al.15, who failed to establish Ger receptor specificities in 17 B. cereus strains with a variable Ger receptor content15. Knockout analysis has also indicated that Ger receptors of the same type may have a different contribution to the germinant response in different bacteria. For example, GerL was linked to L-alanine germination in B. cereus 569, but did not affect L-alanine germination in B. cereus ATCC 1457916. Individual knockout of all ger operons in B. cereus ATCC 14579 failed to identify a role in germination for three (GerK, GerL and GerS) out of the seven Ger receptors, although all operons were transcribed during sporulation16. Clarification of the structure-function relationship of Ger receptors has also been hindered by the difficulty to isolate functional receptors, because they are membrane complexes composed of three subunits and associated with other proteins in a so-called germinosome complex17,18.

The three protein subunits constituting Ger-type GRs are usually encoded in a tricistronic operon. The A protein comprises four to eight predicted membrane-spanning domains, as well as large N- and C-terminal hydrophilic domains. The B protein contains seven to twelve transmembrane helices, and is structurally related to a superfamily of membrane-associated single-component membrane transporters, although the sequence similarity is low. The C subunit of the Ger receptor is predicted to be a lipoprotein that is anchored to the outer surface of the spore inner membrane11,13,19. Remarkably, while the available evidence indicates that all subunits are required to form a functional receptor in bacilli, several clostridia, like C. beijerincki, C. butyricum, C. asparagiforme, encode only a single A subunit, but it is unclear whether this subunit is a functional GR in these bacteria11.

Brunt et al.20 recently made an inventory of the Ger gene clusters in groups I-IV of C. botulinum, based on in silico analysis of 148 C. botulinum and 8 C. sporogenes genomes20. The latter were included because of their close relatedness to gICb. Four different ger clusters were identified (gerX1-4), eventually further divided into subtypes designated with an additional letter. gICb and C. sporogenes strains typically contain three to five different Ger receptors, encoded by gerX1a/c/d, gerX2a/b/c and/or gerX3a. In general, spores from these strains germinate in response to various amino acids in combination with L-lactate, although the latter is not always essential21,22. The functionality of C. botulinum Ger receptors has been experimentally studied in gICb strain ATCC 3502, which has a gerX1a, gerX1d and gerX2b cluster, and in C. sporogenes ATCC 15579, which has a gerX1a, gerX1d, gerX2c and gerX3a cluster22. Construction and analysis of insertional knockouts in the A subunit encoding gene of each individual ger cluster revealed that both gerX1a and gerX1d were essential for amino acid germination in the gICb strain, while gerX2b was completely dispensable. In the C. sporogenes strain, in contrast, only gerX1d was essential for germination, while gerX1a was dispensable, and gerX2c and gerX3a influenced the rate, but not the extent of germination. No conclusions could be made concerning the germinant specificity of the receptors, since the effect of knocking out a receptor was always the same for each of the germinants used (L-ala, L-cys, L-meth, L-ser, L-phe; each in combination with L-lactate). In C. sporogenes, four triple knockout mutants, each carrying only one intact ger cluster, were also constructed. Only the mutant with an intact gerX1d cluster retained wild-type germinant responsiveness, while all other mutants failed to germinate. While this study yielded important insights in Ger receptor function, it also has an important limitation because the insertional knockout of the A subunit gene in a ger cluster does not necessarily abolish expression of the B and C subunits. This is certainly the case for the gerX3a cluster, which has a bicistronic organization, with gerB transcribed in the opposite direction as gerA and gerC.

Much like gICb, gIICb spores germinate in response to several amino acids in combination with L-lactate, but other than in gICb, L-lactate seems to be essential for germination. In a systematic study with three gIICb strains, L-alanine, L-cysteine and L-serine were the amino acids that induced the strongest germination response23. In addition, it was already reported earlier that gIICb spores germinated in response to amino acids at pH 9 in absence of lactate, as well as the combination of L-alanine with glucose, galactose or maltose at neutral pH24. Analysis of gIICb genome sequences indicates that they encode only one Ger receptor, corresponding to the gerX3b type20, but the function of this receptor remains to be investigated.

Mutational studies have also been conducted in C. perfringens, which contains a gerX3 like locus designated gerK, and a distantly located monocistronic gerAA gene25,26. It was concluded that GerKA, GerAA and GerKB only play auxiliary roles since inactivation of either of the corresponding genes had no significant effect on germination. GerKC, on the other hand, was required for the response to germinants such as KCl, L-asparagine, and a L-asparagine–KCl mixture. The finding that the A and B subunits are dispensable in C. perfringens is in striking contrast with the situation in B. subtilis 27.

While Ger-type receptors are widely distributed in sporulating bacteria, there is evidence for the existence of other receptor types. The genome sequences of at least two Clostridium species, C. bartletti and C. difficile, do not contain Ger gene homologs, although spore germination in these bacteria is also induced by specific germinants, consistent with a mechanism involving specific receptors. In the case of C. difficile, germination is induced by the bile component taurocholate, which signals to the spores that they are in their primary niche, the animal gut. Based on the analysis of germination mutants, Francis et al. (2013) proposed that a catalytically inactive homolog of the germination protease CspC is the GR28.

Besides nutrients, also some non-nutrients can induce spore germination. Exogenous Ca2+-DPA directly activates the cortex hydrolase CwlJ in Bacillus without the involvement of GRs29. However, Ca2+-DPA germination is not always clearly linked to CwlJ, since C. difficile spores do not germinate with Ca2+-DPA although the organism encodes a CwlJ homolog (30% amino acid identity with B. subtilis CwlJ)30, while C. perfringens spores germinate in response to Ca2+-DPA despite the absence of a cwlJ homolog in the genome. In C. perfringens, GerK appears to mediate the Ca2+-DPA response since GerK deficient spores germinated very poorly with Ca2+-DPA26. Finally, the cationic surfactant dodecylamine has also been described as a non-nutrient inducer of germination in B. subtilis, C. perfringens and C. difficile 31,32,33. Dodecylamine was proposed to open the spore’s Ca2+-DPA channels without the involvement of the GRs or cortex hydrolases.

It is clear from the above that the mechanisms of spore germination can vary substantially between bacteria and depend on the germinant, and that in clostridia in particular, the role of the Ger receptors and the possible existence of additional GRs requires further investigation. In gIICb strains, the presence of only a single Ger-type receptor (GerX3b) contrasts with the large variety of amino acids that can trigger germination. It seems unlikely that this receptor can respond specifically to all these germinants. In the present work, we deleted the entire gerBAC locus encoding GerX3b to analyse its role in germination by different nutrient and non-nutrient germinants. This was done in a mutant of gIICb strain NCTC 11219 from which we previously deleted the bont/E toxin gene34. Gene deletion is still a major technical challenge in gIICb, and the present work is only the second (after the deletion of bont/E) in which this is successfully accomplished.

Material and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

This work was conducted in an atoxigenic (Δbont::ermB) and uracil auxotrophic (ΔpyrE) mutant of group II C. botulinum strain NCTC 11219 type E, further in this manuscript shortly named Δbont Δpyr or parent strain34. This strain was used for biosafety reasons, and because of the possibility to use pyrE in trans as a negative selection marker for replacement of the gerBAC locus. Liquid clostridial cultures were grown at 30 °C in trypticase peptone glucose yeast extract broth (TPGY), composed of 50 g/l trypticase (Becton-Dickinson, MD, USA), 5 g/l bacteriological peptone (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), 20 g/l yeast extract (Oxoid), 4 g/l glucose (Acros, New Jersey, USA) and 1 g/l sodium thioglycollate (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany). Solid culture media were reinforced clostridial medium (RCM) agar, composed of 37 g/l RCM (Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) and 15 g/l agar, TPGY agar (TPGY broth + 15 g/l agar), or tryptone yeast extract thioglycollate (TYG) agar, composed of 30 g/l tryptone (Lab M, Heywood, UK), 20 g/l yeast extract, 1 g/l sodium thioglycollate and 15 g/l agar. Vegetative cultures were always grown and manipulated under strictly anoxic conditions in a Don Whitley DG250 anaerobic workstation operating with a gas mixture of 80% N2, 10% CO2, and 10% H2, and using overnight pre-reduced media. Spore suspensions were handled in open air, and transferred to the workstation only for experiments involving outgrowth. Spore suspensions were prepared using a two-phase sporulation medium and stored in 0.85% NaCl at 4 °C as described previously34. E. coli strains were grown in lysogeny broth (LB; 10 g/l tryptone, 5 g/l yeast extract, 5 g/l NaCl) or on LB agar (LB + 15 g/l agar) at 37 °C. E. coli DH5α was used for cloning and maintenance of plasmids, while E. coli CA434 (HB101 containing plasmid R70235) served as donor for plasmid conjugation. Antibiotics (Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) were added at the following concentrations when appropriate: thiamphenicol (Tm, 15 μg/ml in agar, 7.5 μg/ml in broth), spectinomycin (Sp, 600 μg/ml for C. botulinum, 100 µg/ml for E. coli), cycloserine (Cy, 250 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (Cm, 25 μg/ml in agar, 12.5 μg/ml in broth). 5-Fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA, Manchester Organics, Cheshire, UK) was used at 500 µg/ml to screen for loss of the pyrE-expressing plasmid pMTL84151∆gerBAC.


Plasmid construction

The plasmid pMTL84151∆gerBAC was constructed to replace the gerBAC locus with the Sp resistance marker aad9 by double homologous recombination in C. botulinum NCTC 11219 Δbont Δpyr. All primers used are listed in Table 1 and were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Heverlee, Belgium). First, the entire pyrE open reading frame (675 bp) was amplified with primers pyrE11219_F and pyrE11219_R, restricted with NdeI/SacI and placed after the pfdx promotor in pMTL83353 which had been opened with the same enzymes. Hereafter, the fragment containing pfdx and pyrE was amplified with primers pMTL83353_F and pyrE11219_R, digested with SbfI and SacI and cloned in pMTL84151, opened with the same enzymes. Flanking regions of gerBAC (5′ region: 932 bp, 3′ region: 1091 bp) were amplified from NCTC 11219 DNA using primer pairs ger5′F/ger5′R and ger3′F/ger3′R, respectively. The aad9 locus (1009 bp) was amplified from plasmid pMTL83353 with primers aad9_F and aad9_R. The flanking 5′ and 3′ regions, the aad9 fragment and pMTL84151 containing pfdx-pyrE, opened by PCR using primer pair pMTL84151_openF / pMTL84151_openR, were then cloned together using Gibson assembly, following the suppliers protocol (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK). After verification by PCR and sequence analysis, the resulting plasmid construct was designated pMTL84151∆gerBAC and was transferred into E. coli CA434 by electroporation.

Table 1 Oligonucleotides used for cloning and construct verification.

Construction of the ∆gerBAC deletion mutant

Plasmid pMTL84151∆gerBAC was introduced into NCTC 11219 Δbont Δpyr by conjugation as described previously34, using selection on RCM agar with Tm and Cy. Purified transconjugants were resistant to Sp and sensitive to FOA, confirming expression of the plasmid aad9 resistance marker and pyrE gene, respectively.

Transconjugants grown in TPGY with Sp, were then plated on TPGY with Sp and FOA to select for clones in which double homologous recombination with the flanking loci of gerBAC as well as loss of the plasmid had occurred. Several cultures had to be grown and plated in parallel before a culture was found that yielded Sp and FOA resistant colonies. These colonies had also lost Tm resistance, indicating loss of the plasmid. PCR and sequence analysis with primers ∆gerBAC_upF/∆gerBAC_downR, annealing just outside the flanking regions used for homologous recombination, confirmed that gerBAC was replaced by aad9. Another PCR with internal primers of gerA was used to verify that the gerBAC locus had not translocated elsewhere in the genome. The mutant was designated NCTC 11219 Δbont Δpyr ΔgerBAC::aad9 (in this manuscript further described as Δbont Δpyr ΔgerBAC).


Whole genome sequence assembly and analysis

To exclude the very unlikely possibility that the gerBAC genes had moved to another place in the chromosome, the Δbont Δpyr ΔgerBAC strain and its parent Δbont Δpyr were subjected to whole genome sequence analysis on a Illumina MiSeq sequencer. First, gDNA from both strains was isolated from overnight cultures using the GeneJET Genomic DNA purification kit (Thermo Scientific). DNA purity and concentration was assessed by Nanodrop analysis, gel electrophoresis and Qubit (Thermo Scientific) analysis. Paired-end libraries were constructed using the NEBNext Ultra gDNA library prep protocol with an average insert size of 240 bp, and analyzed on the Agilent BioAnalyzer (VIB nucleomics core, Belgium) resulting in on average 1.2 million reads per sample. Reads were analysed with Qiagen’s CLC Genomics Workbench version 8.5 (http://www.clcbio.com/), and subjected to standard quality control, read trimming and filtering (reads <15 nucleotides were discarded, quality score limit = 0.01, ambiguous nucleotides trim limit = 2), and read mapping to C. botulinum NCTC 11219 reference WGS with accession number JXMR00000000 (using parameters: mismatch cost = 2, insertion cost = 3, deletion cost = 3, length fraction = 0.8, similarity fraction = 0.8). This resulted in an average 43-fold genome coverage for the parental strain and 51-fold coverage for the ΔgerBAC mutant.


Chemicals and stock solutions

Nutrient germinant mixtures were freshly prepared as 2x concentrated solution in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 7.4, from the following chemicals: L-alanine (Sigma), L-lactate sodium salt (Acros), NaHCO3 (Acros), L-serine (Acros), L-cysteine (Acros), L-threonine (Acros), inosine (Sigma) and D-glucose (Acros). Dodecylamine (Acros) was first dissolved at 1 M in ethanol, and then diluted to 2x of the concentration used in germination experiments (6 mM) in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer. Stock solutions of 120 mM CaCl2 (Chem Lab, Belgium) and 120 mM DPA (Acros) were made in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and the pH of the DPA solution was readjusted to pH 7.5 with Trizma base (Sigma-Aldrich). The two solutions were then mixed in a 1:1 volume ratio and eventually further diluted in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) to achieve final Ca2+-DPA concentrations of 60 mM, 50 mM, 30 mM and 20 mM.


Germination assays

Immediately before use, spores were collected by centrifugation (6,000 RPM, 10 min, 4 °C), resuspended in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4), and heated for 10 min at 65 °C to inactivate any residual vegetative cells and spores that would have spontaneously germinated during storage, and also to activate dormant spores for germination. Hereafter a sample was taken from the suspension, diluted in Tris-HCl buffer and plated on TPGY to determine the initial spore count (t0-HT), which was always around 7 log cfu/ml. The remainder of the spore suspension was mixed with an equal volume of a 2x germinant solution (or buffer as a negative control), and incubated for 4 h at 30 °C. The suspension was then heated for 10 min at 65 °C and plated on TPGY (t4-HT). The degree of germination was expressed as log(t0-HT) – log (t4-HT). Ca2+-DPA was used at 20–60 mM for germination experiments, but because 2x concentrated solutions of 120 mM cannot be made due to the limited solubility of Ca2+-DPA, the spores were resuspended immediately in 60 mM, 50 mM, 30 mM and 20 mM Ca2+-DPA, and the initial heat treatment to activate the spores was done in the presence of Ca2+-DPA in this case.


DPA measurement

After 4 h of incubation, spores were removed from the germinant solution by centrifugation (12,000 × g for 5 min), and 100 µl of the supernatant was mixed with an equal volume of 20 mM TbCl3 in a 96-well black microtiter plate (Greiner Bio-one, Belgium)36. Fluorescence measurements were done in a spectrofluorometer (Synergy Mx-biotek, USA) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 270 and 545 nm, respectively. DPA release was expressed relative to the total spore DPA, which was measured after treatment of the spores at 98 °C for 30 min33.


Microscopy

Heat activated spores were immobilized on thin pads of 1% agarose in Tris-HCl buffer on glass slides, with or without the germinants L-alanine/L-lactate/NaHCO3 (all at 50 mM) incorporated in the agar pad. Time-lapse microscopy was performed with a Ti-Eclipse inverted microscope (Nikon, France) equipped with a pE-100 camera (CoolLED, Andover, UK). Images were acquired using NIS-Elements (Nikon) and further handled with the open source software ImageJ.


Statistical analysis

Experiments were conducted in three repetitions with independent spore suspensions unless otherwise mentioned, and statistical analysis of germination and DPA release was performed using the two-tailed Student’s T-test with a significance level of 0.05.


In silico analysis of Ger receptor genes in 152 gIICb strains

The raw Illumina reads of a previously published37 diverse set of 152 gIICb strains were retrieved from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (Accession number: SRP059342, no corresponding assembly available). The fastq files were processed with BBduk for removal of adapter contamination, trimming (Phred score >28), and size exclusion (read length >50 bp). Each fastq file was subsequently inspected with FastQC for quality control38. The genome of each strain was assembled with SPAdes39, and the quality of the assembly assessed with QUAST40. Functional annotation was done using Prokka41 with a custom protein database created from strains of the Clostridium genus. The protein content of each genome was finally queried using blastp against the GerX3b subunits present in strain Eklund 17B (gene locus tags for gerC, gerA, gerB: CLL_A3167, CLL_A3168, CLL_A3169).

Results

Construction of a ∆gerBAC deletion mutant

The deletion of the gerBAC locus was done in strain NCTC 11219 Δbont Δpyr which was constructed previously in our group34. Besides having the advantage of being nontoxigenic, the pyrE deletion renders this strain resistant to FOA, making it possible to use the pyrE gene as a negative selection marker for making additional gene replacements. The pyrE deletion also renders the strain auxotrophic for uracil, but this did not affect its growth in TPGY medium. Plasmid pMTL84151∆gerBAC (TmRSpR) was conjugated to Δbont Δpyr to allow replacement of gerBAC with aad9. Since pyrE is expressed on the plasmid, it renders the strain FOA-sensitive. Then, plating on RCM with FOA and Sp selects for clones that had lost the plasmid but at the same time retained the Sp resistance cassette by double homologous recombination. PCR analysis (Fig. 1) and sequencing of such clones confirmed replacement of gerBAC by aad9, and WGS analysis additionally confirmed absence of the entire gerBAC locus in the genome of strain NCTC 11219 Δbont ΔpyrgerBAC.

Figure 1
Figure 1

PCR analysis on the gerBAC region of the parental strain NCTC 11219 Δbont Δpyr and the Δbont ΔpyrgerBAC mutant. Lane 1: Molecular size marker (GeneRuler from Thermo Scientific); Lane 2: Parental strain, internal fragment of gerA amplified with primers gerA_F and gerA_R (expected size: 329 bp). Lane 3: ∆gerBAC, no internal gerA fragment could be amplified with primers gerA_F and gerA_R. Lane 4: Parental strain, gerBAC locus amplified with primers ∆gerBAC_upF and ∆gerBAC_downR (expected size: 6252 bp). Lane 5: ∆gerBAC, gerBAC locus amplified with primers ∆gerBAC_upF and ∆gerBAC_downR (expected size: 3198 bp).

The spore yield of the ∆gerBAC strain (6.9 +/− 0.6 log cfu/ml; n = 6) was unaffected (p > 0.05) compared to that of the parental Δbont Δpyr strain (7.2 +/− 0.4 log cfu/ml; n = 6). Colony formation from spores of the ∆gerBAC strain on TPGY agar was not delayed and the colonies were indistinguishable from those of the parent strain. Spore suspensions had stable spore counts as determined after a heat treatment for at least 4 months at 3 °C.

The role of GerX3b in germination induced by L-alanine/L-lactate/NaHCO3

Since the combination of L-alanine, L-lactate and NaHCO3 is one of the most commonly used and efficient inducers of spore germination in gIICb23,24, we first used this germinant mixture to analyse the impact of deletion of the GerX3b receptor. Unexpectedly, germination of the mutant, as assessed by heat treatment and plating and by DPA release (1.5 +/− 0.6 log germination; 69.3 +/− 10.7% DPA release), was not significantly different from that of the parent strain (1.3 +/− 0.3 log germination; 83.2 +/− 8.2% DPA release) (Fig. 2). Replacement of L-alanine by D-alanine reduced germination of both strains to the background level observed in the absence of germinants, indicating stereospecificity of the L-alanine response. Germination was not initiated by L-alanine and NaHCO3 in the absence of L-lactate (data not shown), in accordance with previous reports20,23. Germination was also monitored by time-lapse phase-contrast microscopy of spores deposited on agar pads with and without the L-alanine/L-lactate/NaHCO3 germinant mixture. The results indicated that spore germination progressed at a similar rate in the parental and ΔgerBAC spores (Fig. 3a and b). By the time the spores could be viewed (5 min after deposition on the pad), there were already some phase-dark spores visible. The phase-dark fraction further increased after 20 and 40 min, and after 60 min only few refractile spores remained. When no germinants were included in the pads, the spores remained fully bright (Fig. 3c).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Spore germination of ∆gerBAC spores compared to the parental strain, in L-ala/L-lact/NaHCO3 (all at 50 mM) in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4). (a) Germination assessed by loss of heat resistance (65 °C/10 min), after incubation of heat-activated spores for 4 h at 30 °C in the germinant mixture. D-alanine (50 mM) was used to demonstrate the stereospecific action of germination induction in comparison to L-alanine. Means +/− standard deviations are shown of three experiments using independent spore crops. No significant differences were found (p > 0.05) between the two strains. (b) DPA release of heat-activated spores incubated for 4 h at 30 °C in the germinant mixture, relative to the total DPA content. Mean percentages +/− standard deviations are shown of three experiments using independent spore crops. No significant differences were found (p > 0.05) between the two strains.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Spore germination of ∆gerBAC spores and the parental strain visualized with time-lapse phase-contrast microscopy. (a) Spores of the parental strain and (b) the ∆gerBAC mutant 5 min, 20 min, 40 min and 1 h (from left to right) after deposition on the agar pad containing the germinants L-ala/L-lact/NaHCO3 (all at 50 mM). (c) Spores of the ∆gerBAC mutant on an agar pad without germinants 5 min (left) and 1 h (right) after deposition on the pad. Spores of parental strain also remained bright (data not shown).

The role of GerX3b in germination induced by other nutrient germinants

Because deletion of the putative GerX3b receptor did not affect germination by L-alanine/L-lactate/NaHCO3, we tested other nutrient mixtures previously described to induce gIICb spore germination (Table 2). Only mixtures that induced at least a 0.5 log germination of the parental strain were subsequently also tested on the ΔgerBAC mutant. Besides L-alanine, both L-serine and L-cysteine in combination with L-lactate and NaHCO3 were previously reported as very efficient inducers of germination of gIICb spores23,24, and this was confirmed for the spores of our strain. L-threonine/L-lactate/NaHCO3 and inosine/L-alanine/NaHCO3 mixtures, previously reported as moderate germination inducers23,24, were about equally effective.

Table 2 Spore germination of NCTC 11219 strains after 4 h at 30 °C in different germinant mixtures.

We additionally tested combinations of all other amino acids with L-lactate and NaHCO3, and found that only L-isoleucine and L-valine also induced >0.5 log germination. However, there was again no significant difference between the parental strain and the ΔgerBAC mutant with these germinants (p > 0.05).

No germination was observed with glucose/L-alanine/NaHCO3, glycine, and glycine/L-lactate/NaHCO3, although these were previously reported to induce germination (Table 2)25. Finally, Ando (1971) reported gIICb spore germination by L-alanine, L-cysteine, L-serine at pH 9.0 in the presence of NaHCO3 but without L-lactate24. However, we could not assess spore germination based on the loss of heat resistance for these mixtures, because the spores became heat sensitive in carbonate buffer (pH 9.0) even in the absence of nutrients. Therefore, germination was evaluated by microscopically evaluating the loss of refractility. Because the fraction of phase-dark spores remained <5% even after overnight incubation in the germinant mix, we concluded that these amino acids at pH 9.0 did not induce germination in the NCTC 11219 strain.

The role of GerX3b in germination induced by non-nutrients

Because loss of the putative GerBAC receptor did not affect spore germination by any of the tested nutrient germinants, we next evaluated the effect on spore germination by the non-nutrient germinants Ca2+-DPA and dodecylamine. The ability of these compounds to induce spore germination had not yet been reported in gIICb. Ca2+-DPA failed to induce spore germination in the parental strain at all tested concentrations (20–60 mM), and was therefore not further tested on the ∆gerBAC mutant.

In contrast, spores incubated with dodecylamine (3 mM, 4 h at 30 °C) showed strongly reduced counts after heat treatment, suggesting induction of germination. However, there was again no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the parental strain and the ∆gerBAC mutant (Table 2). Furthermore, the dodecylamine-treated spores did not become fully phase-dark, and released only a relatively small amount of their DPA (42.4 +/− 3.2% for the ∆gerBAC mutant and 39.1 +/− 9.6% for the parental strain). Similarly low values of DPA release have been reported previously when dodecylamine is used to induce spore germination at relatively low temperature (30 °C)34. Together, these observations suggest that dodecylamine treatment may not induce a genuine physiological spore germination process, or that the germination process is incomplete.

In silico analysis of Ger receptor genes in 152 gIICb strains

We assembled previously published sequence reads of 152 gIICb strains40. Seventeen strains were removed from the analysis due to poor assembly performance (N50 < 10,000) (Table S1). Functional analysis of the 135 remaining strains revealed that 130 strains carry the gerBAC locus, with apparently intact open reading frames of the three genes. In each of the five remaining strains, there was always one gene missing, but this was probably an artefact of the assembly because the neighbouring gerBAC gene(s) were at the edge of a contig in those cases. The percentages of positive-scoring substitutions, calculated by NCBI Blastp, varied between 96.30 and 100% (full data shown in Table S2).

Discussion

The classical model of bacterial spore germination states that germination is triggered by the specific binding of a germinant molecule to a cognate GR in the spore membrane. The spores of most sporeforming bacteria respond to different nutrient germinants by means of an array of different GRs. The best studied GRs are those of the Ger-type. Since they are found in almost all sporeforming Bacilli and Clostridia and their importance for germination has been documented in several species, they are therefore considered to be the predominant, if not the only, GRs in these bacteria. This work is the first experimental study of GRs in group II C. botulinum. Analysis of whole genome sequences of 24 gIICb strains (18 of toxin type E, 4 of toxin type B, and 2 of toxin type F) previously indicated the presence of a single ger locus of the GerX3b type (gerBAC) in all these strains20. However, it is difficult to understand how this single receptor could have specific binding sites for the large variety of nutrients that can trigger spore germination in this organism. As a first step to unravel the precise role of the GerX3b receptor in germination, we therefore undertook to delete the entire gerBAC locus encoding the three receptor subunits, using a gene replacement technique that we applied previously to delete the bont gene34.

The entire gerBAC locus was successfully replaced by a spectinomycin resistance marker, as confirmed by sequencing of specific PCR amplicons of the region and whole genome sequence analysis. Much to our surprise, the deletion did not affect germination induction by any of seven major nutrient germinant mixtures, nor by the non-nutrient dodecylamine. Specifically for L-alanine (in combination with L-lactate), we demonstrated that the germination response is stereospecific, since D-alanine did not induce germination. This is in line with the notion that germinants, in gIICb as in other sporeformers, induce spore germination by interaction with a specific receptor. However, our results strongly suggest that GerX3b is not a functional GR, and thus lead to the conclusion that one or more other, so far unidentified, GRs must be responsible for nutrient-induced germination in gIICb.

One possible alternative receptor are the CspC orthologues, since a non-catalytically active CspC variant has been proposed to act as GR in C. difficile 28. cspC and cspBA are located directly upstream of sleC in C. difficile, and the gene upstream of sleC in C. botulinum NCTC 11219 also encodes a predicted subtilase family protein, although the similarity to CspC from C. difficile is rather low (32% amino acid identity over 76% of the sequence). In addition, this putative protease is predicted to contain an intact Asp/Ser/His catalytic triad, as opposed to CspC of C. difficile in which two of the three catalytic residues are absent. BLAST analysis revealed five additional gene products in C. botulinum NCTC 11219 showing low but significant similarity to CspC of C. difficile R20291. In the genomes of gIICb strains Beluga, Alaska E43 and Eklund 17B, the number of CspC orthologues is 5, 6 and 10, respectively. All these predicted proteins are annotated as members of the subtilase family, and contain an intact catalytic triad (data not shown).

Since our results suggest that GerX3b is not a functional GR, and in the assumption that this is the case in all gIICb strains, one would expect the gerBAC genes to have accumulated loss of function mutations in some strains. Brunt et al.20 already analyzed the genome sequences of 24 gIICb strains and found that they all had intact gerBAC genes20. We extended this analysis with 135 additional strains and similarly found that all had intact gerBAC genes. Thus, it appears that maintenance of an intact gerBAC locus is important in gIICb. We are not aware that alternative functions have been reported for Ger-type receptors in any sporeforming bacteria, and it will therefore be interesting to explore such functions in gIICb. On the other hand, the quest for the genuine GRs in gIICb is open. As discussed above, the CspC-like proteins are possible candidates, and their large number in gIICb is compatible with the large variety of germinants in gIICb. However, if they show functional redundancy and hierarchy, as is the case for the multiple Ger receptors in B. cereus, their functional analysis will be a difficult task, because making (multiple) gene knockouts in gIICb remains a challenge. On the other hand, the possible existence of an entirely novel class of GRs should also be considered, and it would be worthwhile to isolate and analyse germination mutants to investigate this possibility.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Carter, A. T. & Peck, M. W. Genomes, neurotoxins and biology of Clostridium botulinum Group I and Group II. Res. Microbiol. 166, 303–317 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Sobel, J. B. Botulism. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41, 1167–1173 (2005).

  3. 3.

    Peck, M. W. Clostridium botulinum and the safety of minimally heated, chilled foods: an emerging issue? J. Appl. Microbiol. 101, 556–570 (2006).

  4. 4.

    Turton, K., Chaddock, J. A. & Acharya, K. R. Botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: Structure, function and therapeutic utility. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 552–558 (2002).

  5. 5.

    Dolly, J. O. & Aoki, K. R. The structure and mode of action of different botulinum toxins. Eur. J. Neurol. 13, 1–9 (2006).

  6. 6.

    Peck, M. W. Biology and genomic analysis of Clostridium botulinum. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 55, 183–265,320 (2009).

  7. 7.

    Peck, M. W. & Stringer, S. C. The safety of pasteurised in-pack chilled meat products with respect to the foodborne botulism hazard. Meat Sci. 70, 461–475 (2005).

  8. 8.

    Gram, L. Potential hazards in cold-smoked fish: Clostridium botulinum type E. J. Food Sci. 66, 1082–1087 (2001).

  9. 9.

    Lindström, M., Kiviniemi, K. & Korkeala, H. Hazard and control of group II (non-proteolytic) Clostridium botulinum in modern food processing. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 108, 92–104 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Lindström, M. et al. Inhibition of growth of nonproteolytic Clostridium botulinum type B in sous vide cooked meat products is achieved by using thermal processing but not nisin. J. Food Prot. 64, 838–844 (2001).

  11. 11.

    Paredes-Sabja, D., Setlow, P. & Sarker, M. R. Germination of spores of Bacillales and Clostridiales species: Mechanisms and proteins involved. Trends Microbiol. 19, 85–94 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Olguín-Araneda, V., Banawas, S., Sarker, M. R. & Paredes-Sabja, D. Recent advances in germination of Clostridium spores. Res. Microbiol. 166, 236–243 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Xiao, Y., Francke, C., Abee, T. & Wells-Bennik, M. H. J. Clostridial spore germination versus bacilli: Genome mining and current insights. Food Microbiol. 28, 266–274 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Bhattacharjee, D., McAllister, K. N. & Sorg, J. A. Germinants and their receptors in clostridia. J. Bacteriol. 198, 2767–2775 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Warda, A. K. et al. Analysis of germination capacity and inventarisation of germinant receptor (sub)clusters of genome sequenced Bacillus cereus environmental isolates and model strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e02490–16 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Barlass, P. J., Houston, C. W., Clements, M. O. & Moir, A. Germination of Bacillus cereus spores in response to L-alanine and to inosine: The roles of gerL and gerQ operons. Microbiology 148, 2089–2095 (2002).

  17. 17.

    Griffiths, K. K., Zhang, J., Cowan, A. E., Yu, J. & Setlow, P. Germination proteins in the inner membrane of dormant Bacillus subtilis spores colocalize in a discrete cluster. Mol. Microbiol. 81, 1061–1077 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Troiano, A. J., Zhang, J., Cowan, A. E., Yu, J. & Setlow, P. Analysis of the dynamics of a Bacillus subtilis spore germination protein complex during spore germination and outgrowth. J. Bacteriol. 197, 252–261 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Setlow, P. Germination of spores of Bacillus species: What we know and do not know. J. Bacteriol. 196, 1297–1305 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Brunt, J., van Vliet, A. H. M., van den Bos, F., Carter, A. T. & Peck, M. W. Diversity of the germination apparatus in Clostridium botulinum groups I, II, III, and IV. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1702 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Alberto, F., Broussolle, V., Mason, D. R., Carlin, F. & Peck, M. W. Variability in spore germination response by strains of proteolytic Clostridium botulinum types A, B and F. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 36, 41–45 (2003).

  22. 22.

    Brunt, J. et al. Functional characterisation of germinant receptors in Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium sporogenes presents novel insights into spore germination systems. PLoS Pathog. 10(9), e1004382 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Plowman, J. & Peck, M. W. Use a novel method to characterize the response of spores of non-proteolytic Clostridium botulinum types B E and F to a wide range of germinants and conditions. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92, 681–694 (2002).

  24. 24.

    Ando, Y. The germination requirements of Clostridium botulinum type E spores. Jpn. J. Microbiol. 15, 515–525 (1971).

  25. 25.

    Banawas, S. et al. The Clostridium perfringens germinant receptor protein GerKC is located in the spore inner membrane and is crucial for spore germination. J. Bacteriol. 195, 5084–5091 (2013).

  26. 26.

    Paredes-Sabja, D., Torres, J. A., Setlow, P. & Sarker, M. R. Clostridium perfringens spore germination: Characterization of germinants and their receptors. J. Bacteriol. 190, 1190–1201 (2008).

  27. 27.

    Setlow, P. When the sleepers wake: the germination of spores of Bacillus species. J. Appl. Microbiol. 115, 1251–1268 (2013).

  28. 28.

    Francis, M. B., Allen, C. A., Shrestha, R. & Sorg, J. A. Bile acid recognition by the Clostridium difficile germinant receptor, CspC, is important for establishing infection. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003356 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Paidhungat, M., Ragkousi, K. & Setlow, P. Genetic requirements for induction of germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis by Ca2+-dipicolinate. J. Bacteriol. 183, 4886–4893 (2001).

  30. 30.

    Wang, S., Shen, A., Setlow, P. & Li, Y. Q. Characterization of the dynamic germination of individual Clostridium difficile spores using Raman spectroscopy and differential interference contrast microscopy. J. Bacteriol. 197, 2361–2373 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Wang, G. et al. Analysis of the germination of individual Clostridium perfringens spores and its heterogeneity. J. Appl. Microbiol. 111, 1212–1223 (2011).

  32. 32.

    Paredes-Sabja, D., Bond, C., Carman, R. J., Setlow, P. & Sarker, M. R. Germination of spores of Clostridium difficile strains, including isolates from a hospital outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD). Microbiology 154, 2241–2250 (2008).

  33. 33.

    Setlow, B., Cowan, A. E. & Setlow, P. Germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis with dodecylamine. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95, 637–648 (2003).

  34. 34.

    Clauwers, C., Vanoirbeek, K., Delbrassinne, L. & Michiels, C. W. Construction of nontoxigenic mutants of nonproteolytic Clostridium botulinum NCTC 11219 by insertional mutagenesis and gene replacement. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 3100–3108 (2016).

  35. 35.

    Williams, D. R., Young, D. I. & Young, M. Conjugative plasmid transfer from Escherichia coli to Clostridium acetobutylicum. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136, 819–826 (1990).

  36. 36.

    Kort, R. et al. Assessment of heat resistance of bacterial spores from food product isolates by fluorescence monitoring of dipicolinic acid release. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 3556–3564 (2005).

  37. 37.

    Weedmark, K. A. et al. Clostridium botulinum group II isolate phylogenomic profiling using whole-genome sequence data. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 5938–5948 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Andrews, S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/ (2010).

  39. 39.

    Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477 (2012).

  40. 40.

    Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. & Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072–1075 (2013).

  41. 41.

    Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).

  42. 42.

    Vepachedu, V. R. & Setlow, P. Role of SpoVA proteins in release of dipicolinic acid during germination of Bacillus subtilis spores triggered by dodecylamine or lysozyme. J. Bacteriol. 189, 1565–1572 (2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the KU Leuven Research Fund (METH/14/03).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Leuven Food Science and Nutrition Research Centre (LFoRCe), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    • Charlien Clauwers
    •  & Chris W. Michiels
  2. Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    • Cédric Lood
    •  & Vera van Noort

Authors

  1. Search for Charlien Clauwers in:

  2. Search for Cédric Lood in:

  3. Search for Vera van Noort in:

  4. Search for Chris W. Michiels in:

Contributions

C.C. designed the experiments with C.W.M., executed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. C.L. and V.v.N. conducted the bioinformatics analysis. C.W.M. conceived the study and finalized the manuscript. All authors discussed and interpreted the data.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris W. Michiels.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15839-y

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.