Article | Open | Published:

Dye-sensitized solar cells based on a push-pull zinc phthalocyanine bearing diphenylamine donor groups: computational predictions face experimental reality

Scientific Reportsvolume 7, Article number: 15675 (2017) | Download Citation


Computational studies have suggested that the integration of secondary amine as donor groups in the structure of unsymmetrical zinc phthalocyanine (ZnPc) should have positive effects on photovoltaic performance, once the molecule is integrated as light harvester in dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Aiming at obtaining experimental confirmation, we synthesized a peripherally substituted push-pull ZnPc bearing three electron donating diphenylamine substituents and a carboxylic acid anchoring group and integrated it as sensitizer in TiO2-based DSSCs. Detailed functional characterization of solar energy converting devices resulted in ruling out the original hypothesis. The causes of this discrepancy have been highlighted, leading to a better understanding of the conditions for an effective design of push-pull diarylamino substituted ZnPcs for DSSCs.


Many research endeavors to spur the efficiency in solar energy conversion of dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs)1 are currently directed to the development of optimized light harvesters, capable of exploiting the whole range of the solar spectrum, including the infrared portion lost in present silicon-based PV technology, in order to eventually obtain the so-called panchromatic sensitization. Investigations from diverse standpoints, spanning from the comprehension of the underlying fundamental phenomena to the assessment of the life cycle and economic effectiveness of these devices, are as well pursued, but special attention is paid to the design of new photosensitizers that could ensure optimal photovoltaic parameters and acceptable lifetime service to DSSCs2. Ruthenium-based sensitizers had a prominent role in early developments of DSSCs and are still widely employed, but they show only moderate light harvesting capability, in particular in the red/near IR spectral regions of the solar radiation3. In this respect, other families of dyes, such as phthalocyanine derivatives4, offer better perspectives especially in view of the architectural integration of DSSCs in energy efficient buildings. Indeed phthalocyanines (Pcs) are thermally, photochemically and electrochemically stable compounds, with unparalleled light-harvesting capability in the far-red and near-IR spectral regions where a substantial solar fluence occurs. These peculiar properties can be fine-tuned by relatively simple synthetic modifications5. The electronic absorption spectrum of Pcs shows two main bands at 300–400 nm (B band) and 620–700 nm (Q band with extinction coefficients in the order of 105 M−1 cm−1). These bands can be shifted or broadened depending on the presence and nature of substituents in the peripheral and non-peripheral positions (see Fig. 1) of the macrocycle. Other relevant characteristics, as the HOMO-LUMO energy level and the distribution of the electronic density, can be varied following the same strategy. Finally, metallation of the macrocycle also allows to tune the behavior of Pc-based photosensitizers and Zn(II) complexes of Pcs (ZnPcs) with their long-lived singlet excited states proved to be remarkably useful in DSCCs6.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Peripherally substituted A3B ZnPc BI54 bearing diphenylamino donors. Only one positional isomer is shown.

The most successful ZnPcs sensitizers reported so far are unsymmetrically substituted molecules characterized by the presence of identical bulky, electron-donating groups on three of the four isoindole subunits (referred to as A) which constitute the Pc macrocycle, while the fourth one (referred to as B) bears one or more anchoring groups able to interact with the metal oxide semiconductor7,8. This A3B molecular design aims to combine steric suppression of dye aggregation, favorable electronic push-pull effects and optimized binding mode of the dye to the surface of the semiconductor layer. It was originally suggested by Nazeeruddin, Torres and coworkers, who were able to achieve power conversion efficiencies up to 4.1% in the case of peripherally substituted A3B ZnPcs bearing tert-butyl donors and -COOH anchoring groups9,10,11. The advent of A3B ZnPcs featuring bulky, electron rich aryl substituents rotated with respect to the macrocycle plane represented a second significant step forward towards efficient DSSCs based on Pcs12,13. For instance, Mori, Kimura and coworkers have shown that power conversion efficiencies up to 6.4% under simulated one-sun illumination can be obtained using a peripherally substituted A3B ZnPc bearing electron-rich 2,6-bis(n-butoxy)phenoxy groups on A and one electron withdrawing –COOH group on B14. Despite the steady progress made in the field, the full potential of ZnPcs as photosensitizers in DSSCs has yet to be realized and further improvements are conceivable7,8. In particular, the application of predictive computational techniques for the rational molecular design of efficient unsymmetrical push-pull ZnPcs has been proposed15,16,17. According to these theoretical studies, the use of -NH2, -NHR, -NR2, NHAr or -NAr2 donor groups instead of alkyl or phenoxy donor groups should improve the photovoltaic performance of unsymmetrical A3B ZnPcs thanks to higher LUMO levels, smaller energy gaps and red-shifted absorption bands. New absorption bands are also expected to emerge in the 400–600 nm region for A3B ZnPcs bearing diphenylamino substituents, which should make them good candidates as panchromatic sensitizers. In the attempt to provide experimental verification to these so far untested predictions, we have synthesized the A3B peripherally tetrasubstituted ZnPc BI54 (Fig. 1) fitting the theoretical model. This molecule has been integrated in DSSCs based on mesoscopic TiO2 as electron transport material and a careful functional characterization of the devices has been carried out.

Results and discussion

We recently developed an efficient procedure for the preparation of 4-(diarylamino)phthalonitriles and demonstrated their use as precursors of symmetrical A4 ZnPcs18. Zn(II)-templated cyclization performed on a mixture of the simplest of these building-blocks, 4-(diphenylamino)phthalonitrile 1, and pentyl 3,4-dicyanobenzoate 2 (molar ratio 3:1) followed by hydrolysis of the ester functionality afforded the A3B ZnPc BI54 in 12% overall yield (Scheme S1, Supporting Information). Having proved the synthetic feasibility of A3B ZnPcs with diarylamino substituents, we next examined the possible use of BI54 as a sensitizer in DSSCs.

The architecture of a DSSC requires the favourable energy alignment of all functional components the electrochemical circuit, namely the electron transport material (ETM), the sensitizer and the redox couple responsible for the regeneration of the photooxidized dye1. The energy levels of the HOMO-LUMO orbitals of the new dye were thus assessed by electrochemical measurements combined with the analysis of the optical properties (See SI, Figures S1, S2 and S3 and Table S1). The heterogeneous electron transfer kinetics at glassy carbon interfaces resulted in quasi-reversible, diffusion-limited waves, with chemical reversibility attained for scan speed > 100 mV/s. Figure 2 sketches the energy alignment of the semiconducting metal oxide (MOx) used as ETM in this work (TiO2) with BI54. The energy levels of an efficient Ru-based dye (N719), widely employed in DSSCs, are also reported for comparison. BI54 presents the needed requirements to be applied as light harvester in DSSCs, with energy levels of about −5.4 eV for the HOMO orbital and −3.72 eV for the LUMO orbital, which would imply a thermodynamically favoured electronic injection from the dye to the TiO2 conduction band (CB) (ΔGINJ BI54-TiO2 ~0.28 eV).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Energy alignment for the components of the solar energy converting devices. N719 is used as reference.

Two kinds of ETM have been prepared and tested as photoanodes: bare commercial TiO2 nanoparticles and composite multi-walled carbon nanotubes-TiO2 nanoparticles (MWCNT-TiO2), which have been reported to enhance the overall device functional performances19. Fig. 3a, d and g show the functional characterization of two typical DSSCs whose photoanodes are made by TiO2 and MWCNT-TiO2 sensitized for 20 hours, which is the commonly used soaking time for Ru-based dyes.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Analysis of DSSCs using BI54 dye as light harvester. (a), (b) and (c): J-V curves of DSSCs sensitized for 20 h, 13 h and 5 h, respectively. (d), (e) and (f): normalized open circuit photovoltage decay (sensitization time: 20 h, 13 h, 5 h). (g), (h) and (i) calculated electron lifetime (sensitization time: 20 h, 13 h, 5 h, respectively). Black and green lines in (a), (d) and (g) refer to photoanodes made by TiO2 nanoparticles and MWCNT-TiO2, respectively. Blue and red lines in (b), (c), (e), (f), (h), (i) refer to device sensitized with BI54 dye alone and BI54 dye with DCA, respectively.

Low photocurrent density values (in both cases lower than 0.4 mA/cm−2) were recorded and a depleted open-circuit voltage (V OC ) was as well observed (350 mV and 370 mV for the devices using bare TiO2 and MWCNT-TiO2 as ETM, respectively). Moreover, no significant difference between the photoanodes with and without MWCNTs was recorded. Analysis of open circuit voltage decay (OCVD) highlights slow charging kinetics: after 20 s irradiation the V OC value was not reached (Fig. 3d), indicating slow charge accumulation, accompanied by electron recombination (both with BI54 + and I3 ). Decay dynamics were essentially the same for both devices. As expected from OCVD observation, electron lifetime (Fig. 3g) is the same in all the voltage range analyzed for both devices.

Pcs aggregation due to π-π stacking has been previously reported as a serious issue affecting these molecular dyes20,21,22, with consequent lowering of associated device performances: co-adsorption of a molecular spacer on TiO2 has then been proposed as an effective countermeasure. Deoxycholic acid (DCA) was thus added during the sensitization of bare TiO2 photoanodes and the soaking time reduced from 20 to 13 h. Decreased sensitization time resulted in dramatically enhanced short-circuit current density (J SC ) values (Figure 3b and Table 1, Entry 3 vs 1), which were almost doubled, compared with those recorded for devices obtained after 20 hours soaking. However, the presence of DCA was found to be not significant in terms of enhanced solar energy conversion efficiency (PCE), which was calculated as high as 0.17% and 0.18% with and without DCA. A further shortening of the photoanode staining, down to 5 hours resulted in no improvement of cell efficiency in the absence of DCA (Fig. 3c, blue line). Actually, when no DCA is co-adsorbed on TiO2 photoanode the V OC value is not changed with respect to 13 hours soaking and only a slight increase in J SC value, from 0.715 mA/cm−2 to 0.764 mA/cm−2 can be appreciated (Table 1 Entry 5 vs 3).

Table 1 Functional parameters of solar energy converting devices based on TiO2 uploaded with dye BI54 for different sensitization times.

These findings indicated once more the critical role played by phthalocyanine aggregation on photoanode surface, even for reduced uptake times. Indeed, by decreasing the soaking time to 5 hours and co-adsorbing DCA (Fig. 3c, red line), a remarkable enhancement of device working parameters (J SC  = 1.376 mA/cm2, V OC  = 540 mV, PCE = 0.43%) is recorded, corresponding to an increase of 80%, 13% and 140%, respectively, with respect to the analogous device with no DCA (Table 1, Entry 6 vs 5).

The increase of V OC is ostensibly related to the negative shift of Fermi level, which may be induced upon the insertion of co-absorbent in the dye23, while the enhancement in the photocurrent density J SC is ascribable to the increased electron injection and charge collection efficiency24.

The improvements achieved by the combined reduction of sensitization time and use of DCA as co-adsorbent also involve the electron lifetime as depicted in Fig. 3g–i. For devices fabricated in the absence of DCA, no difference is observed using sensitization times of 20 and 13 hours (Fig. 3g, black line, and Fig. 3h, blue line, respectively). For 13 hours sensitization (Fig. 3h) the presence of DCA results in a small, but appreciable difference. Finally, the electron lifetime is highly enhanced by the presence of DCA for 5 hours sensitization (Fig. 3i).

In order to gain a deeper insight on the relationship between device performances and sensitization time with/without DCA, a kinetic study of the uptake of BI54 from DCM solutions has been carried out by following the variation of optical density of the photoanode at 725 nm (Fig. 4a). The commercially available Ru-based dye N719, for which a detailed uptake kinetic analysis (monitored at 500 nm) has been previously reported25, was used as a reference.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Dye uptake analysis: (a) Overview of dyeing process and (b) detail for uptake of BI54 in the first hour. Blue circles = BI54 without DCA; red squares = BI54 with DCA; empty triangles = N719. Markers are experimental data, lines are fitting curves as discussed in the text.

Dye uptake on MOx surface is usually a two-step process that can be properly analyzed as a fast exponential growth followed by a second slower step, possibly featuring a pseudo 0-order kinetic, moving towards a plateau.

The first part of the uptake curve can be suitably fitted by the relationship:


Where [T]0 refers to the sites originally available on TiO2 for dye uptake and TD to the sites occupied (dye onto TiO2). The second part of the uptake curve is properly fitted by linear regression, and follows the relationship:


where k1 and k2 are the kinetic constants and [TD]I refers to the dye concentration at the time in which the curve changes from fast to low uptake.

BI54 does not reach a plateau in the uptake curve, not even after 25 hours impregnation. The analysis of apparent kinetic constants (Table 2) reveals other significant details. In the absence of DCA, the initial rate of BI54 anchoring on TiO2 sites (exponential part of the uptake curve) is comparable to that shown by N719, but the second, linear step is dramatically faster (almost four times). A different trend is observed in the case of addition of DCA. The uptake curve of BI54 reaches a plateau after a few hours of soaking, thus confirming the role exerted by DCA, which competes with the dye for TiO2 anchoring sites. This can be as well inferred by the much slower increase of the exponential growth, well visible in Fig. 4a, and by the comparison of the apparent kinetic constants (Table 2). The presence of DCA, indeed, slows down the uptake kinetics by occupying available sites on TiO2 nanoparticles surface, thus limiting the amount of BI54 molecules anchoring on the photoanode: the rate of anchoring in the first step is 1.5 times slower in presence of DCA, while the rate in the second step is decreased of almost six times.

Table 2 Kinetics data for dye uptake onto TiO2.

The kinetics of the anchoring process of BI54 is affected by the presence of DCA even at very reduced dyeing times (Fig. 4b): this provides a further evidence that DCA competes very efficiently with BI54 for TiO2 available anchoring sites24, a critical factor for reducing photogenerated charge recombination in solar energy converting devices23.

A final batch of DSSCs has been then fabricated using a sensitization time of 4 hours and analyzed. In the absence of DCA, a significant improvement of PCE (from 0.18% to 0.92%) with respect to 5 hours soaking, is observed. Also under these conditions, the presence of DCA clearly contributes to enhance cell efficiency, mostly by enhancing the photocurrent density (from 3.02 to 3.39 mA cm−2), while both V OC and fill factor (FF) present similar values (Fig. 5a and Table 1, entries 7 and 8). The increased photocurrent density results in an improvement of the photoconversion efficiency of about 23% (from 0.92% to 1.13%). Consistent with J-V curves, incident photon to electron conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra, reported in Fig. 5b, show an enhancement in all the visible range when DCA is present. In particular IPCE values are increased in the NIR region (730 nm) from 4.6% to 5.2% (14%) and at lower wavelengths (480 nm) from 2.8% to 4.2% (50%). IPCE data recorded in cells having a comparable optical density indicate that the factor ϕinj × ηcollection, where ϕinj is the injection quantum yield and ηcollection is the electron collection efficiency across the photoanode, is improved. The increased quantum yield may result from reduced aggregation, which would otherwise lead to excited state quenching or exciton annihilation. It should be herein reminded that only the first monolayer of adsorbed dye is effective in generating useful photocharges, while subsequent adsorption, via dispersive forces, of dye molecules to form molecular aggregates decoupled from the titania surface is detrimental, resulting in parasitic light absorption and quenching. OCVD analysis, reported in Fig. 5c, shows a drastically reduced drop of voltage for the cell in which DCA is used. By fitting the OCVD curves with an exponential function, the time decay constants may be estimated at 0.45 s and 2.18 s for the cells without and with DCA, respectively, indicating an increase of almost five times of the decay rate when BI54 is left free to aggregate on TiO2.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Functional characterization of DSSCs using BI54 dye as light harvester with (red markers) and without DCA (blue markers) (sensitization time: 4 h). (a) J−V characteristics; (b) IPCE; (c) photovoltage decay and (d) electron lifetime. Markers are experimental points, lines are guide for the eye.

The smoother V OC decay is reflected in an increased electron lifetime (Fig. 5d): after 0.10 s the voltage is quite reduced (0.11 V) if DCA is not employed, while it is twice this value (0.23) when DCA is present.

Open circuit photovoltage observed in all the investigated DSSCs show reduced values as compared with the expectation for TiO2 based cells in the presence of the iodide redox couple. Such a decrease may origin from either a decrease in the band offset or an increased recombination rate constant. A shift in the band edge (which would alter the relative energy positions of TiO2 CB and standard redox potential of the electrolyte redox couple that determines the V OC ) can be estimated through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) by a shift in the chemical capacitance of the cell as a function of voltage.

Figure 6a shows the chemical capacitance of DSSCs sensitized with BI54 (with DCA) and N719 (used as reference). In the low potential region (100–300 mV), the trend of the internal capacitances of the cells is quite constant and is originated by the interfaces of the platinum counter electrode and of the FTO back contact of the photoanode26. In the high potential region the chemical capacitance dominates the capacitive effects inside the cells, showing a linear trait on the logarithmic scale. The chemical capacitance is directly related to the density of electronic states (DOS) in the metal oxide27,28. The trend of the chemical capacitance could then give information about the displacement of the CB of the metal oxide. Since the thickness and the porosity of the oxide are the same for both cells, the effect on the CB is ascribable to the interaction between the dye and the metal oxide27,28,29,30,31,32,33.

Figure 6
Figure 6

(a) Chemical capacitance, (b) as collected recombination resistance and (c) recombination resistance calculated for the same electron density of DSSCs using BI54 (red line) and N719 (black line) as sensitizer.

The net effect in the case of N719 is the downward shift of the EC (by about 150 mV), resulting in an enhancement of the charge injection from the Ru(II) dye to the metal oxide. This contributes to explain the lower photogenerated current observed for BI54, as compared with N719. Moreover, the slopes of the chemical capacitance vs potential curves are different for the two sensitizers, and in particular it appears less steep for BI54. As shown by Barea et al. this means that the interaction between N719 and the TiO2 modify the trap states34.

It is also worth noting that recombination resistances RREC (Fig. 6b and c) of devices sensitized with N719 and BI54 show slightly higher value for N719 (once the as retrieved data, Fig. 6b, are recalculated for the same electron density, Fig. 6c). This finding is not related with the low performance of the devices, as clearly reported by Barea et al 34. These data suggest that low performances recorded for devices sensitized with BI54 are ascribable to impaired charge injection from BI54 LUMO to TiO2 CB and are not due to enhanced recombination processes. Indeed, the driving force for charge injection from the LUMO of BI54 to the CB of the TiO2 is reduced compared to the case of N719 (Fig. 2). By shifting the photocurrent density of BI54 sensitized cell to simulate the same J SC value (namely, similar charge injection condition)34 recorded for the N719 sensitized device, it is possible to observe (Fig. 7) that the two solar energy converting devices perform in the very similar way, confirming that charge injection is the limiting factor for BI54.

Figure 7
Figure 7

Continuous lines represent J–V curves of BI54 (blue) and N719 (black), while the dashed line plots the J–V curve of BI54 shifted upwards until J SC matches that of N719.


Despite the optimistic evaluations pointed out by computational predictions, the push-pull A3B ZnPc BI54 showed rather low solar to electric power conversion efficiencies once integrated as light harvester in DSSCs. As predicted by models, BI54 fulfilled the mandatory requirements for energy alignment with respect to TiO2 used as ETM and the iodide/iodine redox couple, but the successful implementation of this ZnPc requires a careful control of adsorption conditions and possibly the search for other semiconductors offering a better driving force for charge injection. A major issue with this dye design is its tendency to aggregation, which proved drastically detrimental for cell efficiency. This drawback can be partially alleviated by modulating the sensitization time and using an anti-aggregation agent such as DCA that acts as a molecular spacer on the ETM surface. Also, theoretical calculations did not take into account the possible shift in the CB of TiO2, which was highlighted by our experiments and results in a decrease in charge injection efficiency.

Based on these warnings, the design of new push-pull ZnPcs bearing diarylamino substituents is now underway in our laboratories.


Synthesis of BI54

Commercially available reagents were used as received. 4-(diphenylamino)phthalonitrile 1 and pentyl 3,4-dicyanobenzoate 2 were prepared as described in our preceding works18,35. Solvents were purified by standard methods and dried if necessary. Reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) that was conducted on plates precoated with silica gel Si 60-F254 (Merck, Germany). Column chromatography was conducted using silica gel Si 60, 0.063–0.200 mm (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). UV-Vis measurements in solution were performed on a Nicolet Evolution 500 spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron Corporation). FTIR were performed on a Cary 530 instrument (Agilent Technologies). ESI mass spectra were obtained with a ICR-FTMS APEX II (Bruker Daltonics) mass spectrometer. MALDI mass spectra were obtained with a TOF-TOF mass spectrometer Microflex LT (Bruker). Elemental analyses were carried out by the Departmental Service of Microanalysis (University of Milano).

ZnPc BI54

In a flame dried Schlenk tube equipped with a stir bar a mixture of phthalonitriles 1 (266 mg, 0.90 mmol), 2 (73 mg, 0.30 mmol) and Zn(OAc)2.2H2O (55 mg, 0.16 mmol) was suspended in dimethylaminoethanol (12 mL). The mixture was stirred for 24 h at 150 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere. The solvent was then evaporated under vacuum and the residue was treated with MeOH (50 mL). The precipitated black solid was collected by filtration on a Büchner funnel and thoroughly washed with MeOH. The raw material was purified twice by column chromatography (silica gel, THF) to give the dimethylaminoethyl ester of BI54 (MW = 1194) as determined by MALDI-TOF mass analysis (32 mg, 17% with respect to the limiting Zn(II) reagent). The ester was dissolved in THF (4 mL) and treated with 1 M aqueous KOH (1 mL). The mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 8 h, then overnight at room temperature. The organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure and H2O (1 mL) was added to the residue. The pH of the aqueous phase was adjusted to 3 by dropwise addition of aqueous 10% HCl and the mixture was extracted twice with DCM (5 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H2O, brine and dried over MgSO4. Evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure afforded the title compound as a mixture of positional isomers (22 mg, 71%). UV-Vis (THF): λmax/nm (log ε) = 359 (5.01), 496 (4.37), 640 (4.71), 711 (5.35). FTIR (KBr): υmax/cm−1 = 3429, 2922, 1679, 1613, 1590, 1490, 1446, 1385, 1331, 1260, 1088, 1046, 745, 695. MS (MALDI-TOF): m/z calcd for (C69H43N11O2Zn)+ 1121.3. Found: 1121.7. Anal. calcd for C69H43N11O2Zn: C 73.76, H 3.86, N 13.71. Found C 73.70, H 3.89, N 13.67.

Dye-sensitized solar cells

TiO2 paste (20 nm anatase nanoparticles 18NR-T) was purchased from Dyesol and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (average length 5–20 μm) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The redox electrolyte was composed of 0.1 M LiI, 0.05 M I2, 0.6 M 1,2-dimethyl-3-n-propylimidazolium iodide, and 0.5 M 4-tert-butylpyridine dissolved in acetonitrile. TiO2 paste with MWCNT was prepared by mixing an appropriate amount of TiO2 paste (0.102 g) 0.002 wt% of ethanolic solution of MWCNT (0.004 g) under vigorous stirring. Detailed preparation of the paste and deposition of electrodes is reported in ref.19.

Device fabrication

TiO2 paste was deposited onto FTO glass (sheet resistance 10 Ω/□) by tape casting technique. The paste was dried 15 min at ambient conditions and then fired on hot plate for 6 min (130 °C). Two layers of transparent TiO2 and one of scattering TiO2 were deposited. All the samples were finally annealed at 500 °C for 30 min under ambient atmosphere. Photoanode thickness for all the photoanodes was about 15 μm and was evaluated by stylus profilometry.

BI54 dye was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran and the sensitization of photoanodes was performed for 20, 13, 5 and 4 hours in the dark. Concentration of BI54 was kept constant in all the experiments at 5.0 × 10−4 M; DCA was used at the same concentration.

DSSCs were fabricated using dye sensitized oxide photoanodes and platinized FTO glass as a counter electrode (5 nm Pt thin film deposited by sputtering) separated by 25 μm-thick plastic spacers (Surlin from Solaronix). Electrolyte composition was as it follows: 0.1 M LiI, 0.05 M I2, 0.6 M 1,2-dimethyl-3-n-propylimidazolium iodide, and 0.5 M 4-tert-butylpyridine dissolved in acetonitrile. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich and used as received.


UV-Visible measurements were carried out in a T80 spectrophotometer (PG Instruments); quartz cuvettes were used for liquid samples (1 cm optical path). UV-Visible diffuse reflection (DR) spectra on the powders were measured with a Thermo Fisher Evolution 300 spectrophotometer equipped with a DRA-EV-300 integrating sphere. The current–voltage (I-V) characteristics of the fabricated cells were measured without masking by using a Keithley 2400 SourceMeter under simulated sunlight using an ABET2000 solar simulator at AM 1.5 G (100 mW cm−2) calibrated using a reference silicon cell. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out in dark conditions using a SOLARTRON 1260 A Impedance/Gain-Phase Analyzer, with an AC signal 20 mV in amplitude, in the frequency range between 100 mHz and 300 kHz. External bias applied was from 0 to 100 mV above the V OC .

Electron lifetime of the photogenerated charges present in the CB of the dyed semiconductor is calculated from open circuit voltage decay using the following equation:36

$${\tau }_{n}=-\frac{{k}_{B}T}{e}{(\frac{d{V}_{OC}}{dt})}^{-1}\,$$

where kBT is the thermal energy, e is the positive elementary charge.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Hagfeldt, A., Boschloo, G., Sun, L., Kloo, L. & Pettersson, H. Dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Rev. 110, 6595–6663 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Lee, C.-P. et al. Recent progress in organic sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv. 5, 23810–23825 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Robertson, N. Catching the rainbow: light harvesting in dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 1012–1014 (2008).

  4. 4.

    de la Torre, G., Claessens, G. C. & Torres, T. Phthalocyanines: old dyes, new materials. Putting color in nanotechnology. Chem. Commun. 20, 2000–2015 (2007).

  5. 5.

    Ragoussi, M.-E. & Torres, T. Modern synthetic tools toward the preparation of sophisticated phthalocyanine-based photoactive systems. Chem. Asian J. 9, 2676–2707 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Martínez-Díaz, M. V., de la Torre, G. & Torres, T. Lighting porphyrins and phthalocyanines for molecular photovoltaics. Chem. Commun. 46, 7090–7108 (2010).

  7. 7.

    Singh, V. K., Kanaparthi, R. K. & Giribabu, L. Emerging molecular design strategies of unsymmetrical phthalocyanines for dye-sensitized solar cell applications. RSC Adv. 4, 6970–6984 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Martín-Gomis, L., Fernández-Lázaro, F. & Sastre-Santos, Á. Advances in phthalocyanine-sensitized solar cells (PcSSCs). J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 15672–15682 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Reddy, P. Y. et al. Efficient sensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 films by a near-IR absorbing unsymmetrical zinc phthalocyanine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 373–376 (2007).

  10. 10.

    Cid, J. J. et al. Structure-function relationships in unsymmetrical zinc phthalocyanines for dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Eur. J. 15, 5130–5137 (2009).

  11. 11.

    García-Iglesias, M. et al. Effect of anchoring groups in zinc phthalocyanine on the dye-sensitized solar cell performance and stability. Chem. Sci. 2, 1145–1150 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Eu, S., Katoh, T., Umeyama, T., Matano, Y. & Imahori, H. Synthesis of sterically hindered phthalocyanines and their applications to dye-sensitized solar cells. Dalton Trans. 40, 5476–5483 (2008).

  13. 13.

    Mori, S. et al. Enhancement of incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency for phthalocyanine-sensitized solar cells by 3D molecular structuralization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 4054–4055 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Ikeuchi, T. et al. Molecular engineering of zinc phthalocyanine sensitizers for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 50, 1941–1943 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Yang, L. et al. Theoretical design and screening of panchromatic phthalocyanine sensitizers derived from TT1 for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 34, 1–9 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Yang, L. et al. Substituent effects on zinc phthalocyanine derivatives: A theoretical calculation and screening of sensitizer candidates for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 38, 82–89 (2012).

  17. 17.

    Linares-Flores, C., Mendizabal, F., Arratia-Pérez, R., Inostroza, N. & Orellana, C. Substituents role in zinc phthalocyanine derivatives used as dye-sensitized solar cells. A theoretical study using Density Functional Theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 639, 172–177 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Cho, K. T. et al. Perovskite solar cells employing molecularly engineered Zn(II) phthalocyanines as hole-transporting materials. Nanoenergy 30, 853–857 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Dembele, K. T. et al. Hybrid carbon nanotubes–TiO2 photoanodes for high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 28, 14510–14517 (2013).

  20. 20.

    He, J. et al. Modified phthalocyanines for efficient near-IR sensitization of nanostructured TiO2 electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 4922–4932 (2002).

  21. 21.

    Morandeira, A. et al. Ru(II)-phthalocyanine sensitized solar cells: the influence of co-adsorbents upon interfacial electron transfer kinetics. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 5016–5026 (2009).

  22. 22.

    Yum, J. H. et al. Effect of coadsorbent on the photovoltaic performance of zinc pthalocyanine-sensitized solar cells. Langmuir 24, 5636–5640 (2008).

  23. 23.

    Lim, J., Kwon, Y. S. & Park, T. Effect of coadsorbent properties on the photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 47, 4147–4149 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Sharma, G. D., Kurchania, R., Ball, J. R., Roy, M. S. & Mikroyannidis, J. A. Effect of deoxycholic acid on the performance of liquid electrolyte dye-sensitized solar cells using a perylene monoimide derivative. International Journal of Photoenergy 2012, 983081 (2012).

  25. 25.

    Concina, I. et al. On-line monitoring and active control of dye uptake in dye-sensitised solar cells. Chem. Commun. 47, 11656–11658 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Bisquert, J. Chemical capacitance of nanostructured semiconductors: its origin and significance for nanocomposite solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 5360–5364 (2003).

  27. 27.

    Howie, W. H., Claeyssens, F., Miura, H. & Peter, L. M. Characterization of solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells utilizing high absorption coefficient metal-free organic dyes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 1367–1375 (2008).

  28. 28.

    O’Regan, B. C., Scully, S., Mayer, A. C., Palomares, E. & Durrant, J. The effect of Al2O3 barrier layers in TiO2/dye/CuSCN photovoltaic cells explored by recombination and DOS characterization using transient photovoltage measurements. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 4616–4623 (2005).

  29. 29.

    Nazeeruddin, M. K., Humphry-Baker, R., Liska, P. & Grätzel, M. Investigation of sensitizer adsorption and the influence of protons on current and voltage of a dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cell. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 8981–8987 (2003).

  30. 30.

    Liu, Y., Hagfeldt, A., Xiao, X.-R. & Lindquist, S.-E. Investigation of influence of redox species on the interfacial energetics of a dye-sensitized nanoporous TiO2 solar cell. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 55, 267–281 (1998).

  31. 31.

    Fabregat-Santiago, F., Bisquert, J., Garcia-Belmonte, G., Boschloo, G. & Hagfeldt, A. Influence of electrolyte in transport and recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells studied by impedance spectroscopy. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 87, 117–131 (2005).

  32. 32.

    Bisquert, J. et al. A review of recent results on electrochemical determination of the density of electronic states of nanostructured metal-oxide semiconductors and organic hole conductors. Inorg. Chim. Acta 361, 684–698 (2008).

  33. 33.

    Rühle, S. et al. Molecular Adjustment of the Electronic Properties of Nanoporous Electrodes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 18907–18913 (2005).

  34. 34.

    Barea, E. M. et al. Energetic factors governing injection, regeneration and recombination in dye solar cells with phthalocyanine sensitizers. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1985–94 (2010).

  35. 35.

    Pozzi, G. et al. Fluorous molecules for dye-senzitized solar cells: synthesis and photoelectrochemistry of unsymmetrical zinc phthalocyanine sensitizers with bulky fluorophilic donor groups. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 3777–3788 (2011).

  36. 36.

    Zaban, A., Greenshtein, M. & Bisquert, J. Determination of the electron lifetime in nanocrystalline dye solar cells by photovoltage decay measurements. Chem. Phys. Chem. 4, 859–864 (2003).

Download references


The present work has been supported by the CNR/Regione Lombardia project “Integrated Zero Emission Buildings”. IC thanks VINNOVA under the VINNMER Marie Curie Incoming project “Light Energy” (LiEn), project No. 2015–01513, for partial funding.

Author information


  1. Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Via Valotti, 9 – 25131, Brescia, Italy

    • Riccardo Milan
    • , Gurpreet Singh Selopal
    •  & Isabella Concina
  2. CNR-INO SENSOR Laboratory, via Branze, 45 – 25123, Brescia, Italy

    • Riccardo Milan
    •  & Isabella Concina
  3. Schulich Faculty of Chemistry, Technion−Israel Institute of Technology, 32000, Haifa, Israel

    • Riccardo Milan
  4. Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, P. R. China

    • Gurpreet Singh Selopal
  5. Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Énergie, Matériaux et Télécommunications, 1650 Boul. Lionel Boulet, Varennes, QC J3X 1S2, Canada

    • Gurpreet Singh Selopal
  6. Institute of Molecular Science and Technology, ISTM-CNR, Via Golgi 19, 20133, Milano, Italy

    • Marco Cavazzini
    • , Simonetta Orlandi
    •  & Gianluca Pozzi
  7. Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Borsari 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy

    • Rita Boaretto
    •  & Stefano Caramori
  8. Division of Materials Science, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden

    • Isabella Concina


  1. Search for Riccardo Milan in:

  2. Search for Gurpreet Singh Selopal in:

  3. Search for Marco Cavazzini in:

  4. Search for Simonetta Orlandi in:

  5. Search for Rita Boaretto in:

  6. Search for Stefano Caramori in:

  7. Search for Isabella Concina in:

  8. Search for Gianluca Pozzi in:


S.O., M.C. and G.P. synthesized the new dye; R.B. and S.C. performed the optical and electrochemical characterization of the dye in solution; R.M., G.S.S. and I.C. prepared and characterized the solar cells; I.C., R.M. and G.P wrote the first draft of the manuscript; I.C. and G.P. supervised the research project. All the authors contributed in the data analysis and in the discussion of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Isabella Concina or Gianluca Pozzi.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history






By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.