Article | Open

# High potential thermoelectric figure of merit in ternary La3Cu3X4 (X = P, As, Sb and Bi) compounds

• Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 14270 (2017)
• doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14658-5
Accepted:
Published online:

## Abstract

We investigate the thermoelectric properties of the relatively unexplored rare-earth ternary compounds La3Cu3X4 (X = Bi, Sb, As, and P) using first principles electronic structure and Boltzmann transport calculations. These compounds, of which the La3Cu3Sb4 and La3Cu3Bi4 have previously been synthesized, are all predicted to be semiconductors and present a wide range of bandgaps varying from 0.24 eV (for the Bi compound) to 0.87 eV (for the P compound). We further find a mixture of light and heavy bands, which results in a high thermoelectric power factor. In addition, as discussed in our previous study (Phys. Rev. B 95 (22), 224306, 2017) at high temperatures of 1000 K these compounds exhibit lattice thermal conductivity less than 1 W/mK. The combination of low thermal conductivity and good transport properties results in a predicted ZT as high as ~1.5 for both La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4, under high p-type doping. This predicted high performance makes these compounds promising candidates for high temperature thermoelectric applications and thus merits further experimental investigation.

## Introduction

Thermoelectric materials can convert waste heat to useful electricity. The performance of a thermoelectric material is determined by the figure of merit (ZT) given by $S 2 σ κ$, where S is the thermopower, σ is the electrical conductivity, and κ is the thermal conductivity. The quantity S2σ is referred as the power factor. Over the last few decades both theoretical and experimental research on thermoelectrics has escalated due to the development of new synthesis techniques, as well as theoretical models. Favorable thermoelectric properties have been realized in several materials such as inorganic clathrates1,2, skutterudites3,4,5, magnesium group IV compounds6,7,8, half Heusler alloys9,10,11, SnSe12,13,14, and PbTe15,16,17. Additionally nanostructuring, which reduces the lattice thermal conductivity via enhanced phonon scattering can provide a route to achieve high ZT. Various theoretical and experimental studies have discussed the role of mass anisotropy14,16,18, quantum confinement19,20, and band structure engineering14,21,22,23 in designing materials with enhanced thermoelectric properties.

Mahan and Sofo proposed two decades ago that a delta-function electron density of states distribution near the band edge results in large thermopower24. This delta function behavior in the density of states can be realized in nature by the f-electron level of the rare earth element in a material25,26. For example, the intermetallic alloy YbAl3, exhibits highest power factor among all known thermoelectric materials in the temperature range 100–300 K27,28. This large factor is attributed to a sharp feature in the density of states near the band edge, which originates from the interaction of Yb 4f electrons with the conduction electrons. However, due to a large electronic thermal conductivity (κ e ) only a small ZT of 0.13 was achieved28. On the contrary κ e can be strongly suppressed in semiconducting rare earth compounds and more importantly they present the possibility to engender not only large power factor but also high ZT.

While some study of ternary rare earth semiconducting compounds aimed at thermoelectric applications has been carried out29,30,31 a detailed investigation of materials properties that are essential for high ZT is still elusive. In this paper, we present a comprehensive study of the thermoelectric properties of the relatively unexplored ternary La3Cu3X4 (X = P, As, Sb and Bi) compounds. As the bandgap of La3Cu3Sb4 and La3Cu3Bi4 is calculated to be < 0.33 eV, here we explore the possibilities of enhancing their bandgap by studying the homologous compounds such as La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4. The latter two compounds are not known experimentally, so we asses their structural and thermodynamic stability by using structure prediction method. We found that the La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 also prefer the same crystal structure as the Bi and Sb counterparts. We find these compounds to be semiconducting with bandgaps ranging from 0.23 eV to 0.87 eV. In addition, these compounds exhibit structural and electronic features such as high band degeneracy, and combination of both heavy and light bands near the band edges, which yield high power factor. Furthermore as discussed in our recent study32, these compounds exhibit low lattice thermal conductivity (<1 W/mK) at high temperatures. By optimizing the ZT with respect to the doping concentrations at different temperatures, we find a peak ZT value of ~1.5 for p-type La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 at 1000 K at doping concentration of 7 × 1020 cm−3.

## Results

### Crystal structure and thermodynamical stability of La3Cu3X4 (X = P, As, Sb, and Bi) compounds

Previous experimental reports have established that La3Cu3Sb4 and La3Cu3Bi4 crystallize in the cubic structure, with the space group I-43d33,34. However, the P and As analogs are not yet reported, despite the existence of compounds with other stoichiometries, such as La5Cu19P1235, LaCu4P336, LaCu1.09P236, and LaCu1.233As237 in these ternary groups. With this in mind, we made a detailed theoretical study of possible physical structure of the ternaries La3Cu3P4/La3Cu3As4 and their thermodynamical stability. First one must determine the likely physical structure of these ternary phases, since the thermoelectric properties are necessarily sensitive to the actual structure. This is a substantial task, but one for which powerful computational techniques have recently been developed38,39,40,41,42. Here to predict the structure of La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 we use a global structure search method with the particle swarm optimization (PSO)41 algorithm as implemented in the Calypso code43. Enthalpy of formation (ΔH f ) for the prospective phases of La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 was calculated with respect to their elemental phases. The resulting energetic diagram is shown in Fig. 1(a,b) for La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4, respectively. In the case of La3Cu3P4 we find two structures with space group I-43d and Ia3 to be nearly equal in energy.

To further investigate their stability we present phonon calculations for both structures. An enlarged version of Fig. 1(c,d) and its effect of lattice thermal conductivity is already published and discussed at length in our recent study32. Here phonon dispersions are presented to address the dynamical stability of these compounds. As shown in Fig. 1(c) the structure with the space group I-43d is dynamically stable, whereas the structure with space group Ia3, is dynamically unstable (Supplementary Information Fig. S1). For La3Cu3As4 the structure with space group I-43d was found to be the most stable (Fig. 1(d)). This analysis suggests that the experimentally grown La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 would favor crystallizing in the I-43d space group, which is the same as the other homologous compounds La3Cu3Sb4 and La3Cu3Bi4. The computed DFT lattice parameters of all four compounds studied here are shown in Table 1. All the calculations presented in this work are done with these optimized lattice parameters. Because of the large electronegativity difference between La and X, La transfers its electrons to X atoms. Hence the structure can be described as a Cu-X tetrahedron where the La atoms are separated by Cu-X tetrahedra as shown in Fig. 2(a).

Once the crystal structure of a material is known, next task is to explore its thermodynamical stability. To predict the thermodynamic stability finding a negative formation enthalpy for La3Cu3P4, and La3Cu3As4 with respect to their elemental phases is a very weak test of stability as most missing materials have negative formation enthalpies but are instead unstable with respect to other binary/ternary competing phases. Hence, one must verify that the compound is thermodynamically stable against decomposition, not only into the respective elements, but into every other possible set of constituents, including all binary and ternary phases. Thermodyamical stability of a compound is generally described by calculating its decomposition enthalpy (ΔED) with respect to all other stable competing phases. Higher ΔED means less probability of a phase being thermodynamically stable.

For the ternary phase diagram44 of La-Cu-P and La-Cu-As, there are over twenty possible phases (these are listed and discussed in the Supplementary Information). We list there the formation enthalpy for all phases given by the Materials Project45,46,47 and AFLOWLIB data base48,49, as well as those we have directly calculated. Fortunately, nearly all of the binary compounds listed there have formation enthalpies substantially smaller in magnitude than La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4, so that the most potential decomposition pathways are energetically blocked. The only exception to this for La3Cu3P4 are LaP and LaP2, which show a substantial formation enthalpy magnitude of −1.5 eV/atom and −1.1 eV/atom, respectively. When one assesses a potential decomposition of the prospective La3Cu3P4 into LaP and LaCu4P3, one then finds a marginal decomposition, with the energy gained being ~190 meV/atom. Similarly for La3Cu3As4; LaAs, La4As3 and LaAs2 show higher formation energy than La3Cu3As4. However as discussed in the Supplementary Information, on considering the decomposition of La3Cu3As4 into LaAs, La4As3 and LaAs2via most favorable pathways the energy gain is only ~150 meV/atom. While this decomposition is possible, one often finds compounds with similar marginal calculated energetics which do in fact form, potentially in a metastable configuration. For example, these same calculations find the experimentally known (with melting points above 1000 K) La3Cu3Sb4 and La3Cu3Bi4 compounds to also be thermodynamically unstable, with decomposition enthalpies of 93 meV/atom and 60 meV/atom, respectively as shown in Table 1. In addition, an examination of published data (The Materials Project)45,50 finds several known compounds in the Copper-pnictogen binary phases with high decomposition enthalpies which nonetheless form. For example, Cu3As451, Cu3N52, and Cu3Sb53 have calculated decomposition enthalpies of 264, 189 and 114 meV/atom, respectively. Furthermore, in a recent study on half Heusler alloys Butler et. al54 showed that the majority of half-Heusler compounds which form experimentally show decomposition enthalpies in the range of 0–100 meV/atom. Given this we find there is a substantial probability that La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 will in fact form in the studied structure, and leave the matter for experimental inquiry. It is our opinion that the predicted high thermoelectric performance (described below) of this phase, if it exists, justifies experimental efforts to obtain it, despite the question about its thermodynamic stability.

### Electronic structure

We begin by analyzing the band structures of La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3Bi4, depicted in Fig. 2(c,d). The band structures of La3Cu3As4 and La3Cu3Sb4 can be found in the Supplementary Information Fig. S2. Among the four compounds La3Cu3Sb4, and La3Cu3Bi4 are indirect bandgap semiconductors with valence band maximum (VBM) in between Γ-H direction and conduction band minimum (CBM) at Γ point. The band structures of La3Cu3Bi4 and La3Cu3Sb4 are similar to the other analogs compounds such as La3Au3Sb4 and La3Au3Bi455,56. On the other hand La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 are direct gap semiconductors with both VBM and CBM at Γ point. The calculated bandgaps for La3Cu3P4, La3Cu3As4, La3Cu3Sb4, and La3Cu3Bi4 are 0.88, 0.72, 0.33, and 0.24 eV, respectively. The smaller bandgap of the Bi and Sb compounds suggest that bipolar conduction will be a concern with these materials, and therefore their thermoelectric performance will potentially be optimal at lower temperatures. The other two compounds, should be largely free from bipolar conduction even at high temperatures. The calculated density of states (DOS) for La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3Bi4 are presented in Fig. 3(a,b), respectively. The DOS for La3Cu3As4 and La3Cu3Sb4 can be found in the Supplementary Information Fig. S3. From the DOS plots, one sees that while the valence bands for all four compounds have substantial X (X = P, As, Sb, and Bi) p character, the conduction bands have primarily Cu-s/p and Bi-p character (some contribution from La-d states can also be seen). The La-f and Cu-d states are located more than 2 eV away from the CBM and the VBM, respectively.

The most significant effect of the inclusion of spin orbit coupling is to reduce the calculated bandgap. The spin orbit coupling is rather important in La3Cu3Bi4 and La3Cu3Sb4, due to the relatively large atomic number of Bi/Sb. Here relevant states of Bi/Sb are p states, which experience less electronic screening and hence a stronger nuclear charge, enhancing the effect of spin-orbit coupling. The band structures calculated without spin orbit coupling are also shown in Fig. 2(c,d) by red dashed line. We find that the magnitude of spin orbit splitting increases as we go from La3Cu3P4 to La3Cu3Bi4. This is expected, as spin orbit Hamiltonian is stronger for larger atomic numbers. As can be seen from Fig. 2(c,d), the spin-orbit interaction not only lifts the degeneracy of the bands but also increases the splitting of bands with increasing atomic number of the X atom.

In principle, materials with complex band structures and higher band degeneracies lead to better thermoelectric performance than single parabolic bands. This can happen when multiple bands have their band extrema with little or no difference in energy (orbital degeneracy or “band convergence”), or when multiple carrier pockets in the Brillouin zone are degenerate because they are symmetrically equivalent due to the symmetry of the crystal (valley degeneracy). Generally for cubic compounds such as the ones studied here, the symmetry results in threefold degenerate p orbitals at Γ point because of the equivalency of the x, y, and z directions in the Brillouin zone. However, due to spin orbit coupling the p z orbital splits from the p x and p y orbitals, where the magnitude of the splitting is determined by the strength of spin orbit coupling. As a result, the valence bands at the Γ point split into a doubly degenerate band and a nondegenerate band, mainly composed of p x/y and p z orbitals, respectively which originate from atom X. As shown in the band structures due to the low atomic mass the splitting is minimal (37 meV) for La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4. Also the dispersion of these first three bands near VBM is dramatically different; two bands being relatively heavy and one band being highly dispersive (nearly parabolic). Usually the lower splitting and a combination of heavy and light bands results in higher thermoelectric performance14,22,23,57. This suggests that the thermoelectric performance of La3Cu3P4 will be higher than that of the other compounds. On the other band the VBM for La3Cu3Bi4, and La3Cu3Sb4 is located slightly off the Γ along Γ-H direction resulting in no band degeneracy. Furthermore, other subsidiary maxima is located at ~80 meV below the VBM along Γ-N direction. For the most part all compounds show a considerable asymmetry between the valence and conduction bands, and therefore will behave differently under hole and electron doping. The band forming the conduction band edge is more dispersive than the valence band edge. Thus, the effective mass of the holes is much larger than that of the electrons as shown in Table 1, indicating that p-doping will have higher thermopower than n-doping. The overall electronic structure of these materials is quite similar and as discussed in the next section the main factor affecting the electronic transport in these compounds is the magnitude of bandgap not the topology of the bands.

### Thermopower and power factor

For a given value of carrier concentration and relaxation time, we can calculate the thermopower and electrical conductivity using Boltzmann transport theory as introduced in the Methods section. In these calculations, the thermopower and electrical conductivity tensor are calculated by integrating over all the electronic states. Figure 4(a,b) show the p-type thermopower for La3Cu3P4, and La3Cu3Bi4 as a function of carrier concentration at 300 and 1000 K. The thermopower plots for La3Cu3As4, and La3Cu3Sb4 are given in the Supplementary Information Fig. S4. By using the Wiedemann-Franz relation, we can rewrite the expression of ZT as, $ZT= r S 2 L 0$. Here r = κ e /(κ e  + κ l ) and L0 is the Lorenz number for semiconductor. This relation tells us that even if the contribution of lattice thermal conductivity to ZT is ignored (r = 1), a thermopower S = 156 μV/K is required to achieved a ZT of 1.

We discuss La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 first. The 300 K thermopower plots exhibits logarithmic dependence on carrier concentration, in agreement with Pisarenko behavior. As seen, high thermopower (>200 μV/K) is obtained even at quite low temperatures (300 K) with doping concentration up to 5 × 1019 cm−3. At 1000 K for both La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 thermopowers in the range of 180–300 μV/K are found for hole concentrations between 6 × 1019 cm−3 to 2 × 1020 cm−3. Due to the substantial bandgap of La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4, there are no bipolar effects and therefore thermopower keeps on increasing with temperature even at low doping concentrations. Due to the higher effective masses (presented in Table 1) the thermopower for p-type doping is nearly 1.5 times higher than that of n-type doping. Thermopower under n-type doping is presented in the Supplementary Information Fig. S4. Next we discuss thermopower for La3Cu3Sb4 and La3Cu3Bi4. With a calculated bandgap of 0.24 and 0.33 eV for Bi and Sb compound we expect significant bipolar conduction at high temperatures. The experimental measurements for hole doped thermopower of La3Cu3Sb4 were carried out by Fess et al30. Their measured 300 K thermopower of ~60 μV/K at hole doping of 5.1 × 1020 cm−3 agrees well with our calculated value of 55 μV/K. As shown in Fig. 4(b) we find that 1000 K hole doped thermopower barely exceeds 200 μV/K. The n-type thermopower does not even exceed −180 μV/K (shown in Supplementry Information Fig. S4.), indicating poor thermoelectric performance under n-type doping.

As explained before the main  advantage of P and As compounds is their higher bandgap and density of states mass, which gives rise to large thermopower. The thermopower of La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3Bi4 is compared in Fig. 4 and thermopower at hole concentration of 6 × 1019 cm−3 is also marked for comparison. As can be seen in Fig. 4(a), at 300 K p-type thermopower of La3Cu3P4 is 1.4 times higher than that of Bi compounds. Since the bipolar effect does not come into play at room temperature the origin of this thermopower should lie in the electronic structure. As discussed before the hole effective mass is ~1.8 times higher in La3Cu3P4 than in La3Cu3Bi4, which contributes to its high thermopower. As we go toward higher temperatures (shown for 1000 K) bipolar effect starts to contribute for La3Cu3Bi4 which reduces its thermopower at carrier concentration below 6 × 1019 cm−3. In order to quantify the gain in thermopower from the enhanced bandgap we performed thermopower calculation for La3Cu3P4 with the bandgap of La3Cu3Bi4 (0.24 eV) and vice versa for La3Cu3Bi4. Here the bandgap was modified by applying the scissor operator within the BoltzTraP code. These results are shown in Fig. 4(a,b). As expected at room temperature for most of the carrier concentration range the thermopower obtained with the modified bandgap overlaps with the one obtained with the original bandgap. Situation is different at 1000 K. The thermopower for La3Cu3P4 with 0.24 eV bandgap approaches same value as the La3Cu3Bi4 themopower at carrier concentrations lower than 6 × 1019 cm−3 due to enhanced bipolar effects. However at higher carrier concentrations in particular past 2 × 1020 cm−3 the La3Cu3P4 thermopower merges with the original curve. This is because, at high carrier concentrations higher effective mass of La3Cu3P4 enhances its thermopower. Similarly the thermopower for La3Cu3Bi4 with bandgap of 0.88 eV approaches the La3Cu3P4 thermopower at low carrier concentrations. However, due to its low effective mass at high carrier concentrations, thermopower remains more or less same as the original La3Cu3Bi4 thermopower. This analysis shows that the higher bandgap along with the high effective mass contributes to the higher thermopower of La3Cu3P4 when compared with the smaller bandgap compound La3Cu3Bi4.

In order to present more information on thermoelectric behavior, we calculate the power factor divided by the inverse scattering rate (S2σ/τ), at 1000 K, as illustrated in Fig. 5(a) for La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3Bi4. The power factor for La3Cu3As4 and La3Cu3Sb4 can be found in the Supplementary Information Fig. S5. Also as these materials show promising thermopowers under p-type doping from this point onward mainly the results for hole doping will be discussed. Both La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 show relatively higher power factor than that of La3Cu3Sb4 and La3Cu3Bi4. To explain the high power factor for P and As compounds we plot the thermopower and σ/τ for La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3Bi4 at 1000 K under p-type doping as shown in Fig. 5(b). In the typical required thermopower range for high performance thermoelectric materials (180–200 μV/K), the σ/τ of La3Cu3P4 exceeds σ/τ of La3Cu3Bi4 by more than a factor of 2.4. If the scattering time for these two compounds assumed to be the same, the electric conductivity of La3Cu3P4 should be higher than La3Cu3Bi4. The relatively high σ/τ value for La3Cu3P4 in comparison with La3Cu3Bi4 is bit surprising, as hole effective mass of former is significantly larger than the latter as shown in Table 1. For P and As compounds two weak dispersive bands degenerated at the Γ point form heavier bands, which leads to a large thermopower. Another strong dispersive band is approximately parabolic near the Γ point, which is helpful to promote its carrier mobility. Thus, the combination of these heavy and light bands in the upper valence band is responsible for the relatively large thermopower and σ/τ in La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4.

Within the framework of Boltzmann transport theory the electrical conductivity is calculated by assuming the constant relaxation time. However for a real estimate of electrical conductivity it is necessary to have information about relaxation time τ. Here, we model τ by comparing the calculated σ/τ to the experimentally measured electrical conductivity. Specifically, for p-type La3Cu3Sb4, the room temperature electrical conductivity data from Fess et al.30 at a carrier concentration of 5.13 × 1020 cm−3 was used. At this doping level reported electrical conductivity is approximately 3.7 × 104 S/m, which yields a τ value of 3.3 × 10−15 s. At last since the electronic structure near the band edge is similar for all 4 compounds, we use the same relaxation time τ for ZT calculations in all four compounds.

The lattice thermal conductivity (κ latt ) of these compounds was calculated in our recent work32, where a low κ latt of 1W/mK was found at high temperatures (>900 K) for all four compounds. The 300 K κ latt for all four compounds are reproduced in Table 1 for comparison. The κ latt for La3Cu3Sb4 and La3Cu3Bi4 is in the range with the measured values for the other homologous compounds. For instance at 300 K a κ latt of 3.8, 1.6, and 2.5 W/mK has been reported for Y3Cu3Sb458, Ce3Cu3Sb430, and La3Cu3Sb430. As discussed in ref.32, the κ latt for P and As compounds is comparable with the state of the art thermoelectric materials such as PbTe59 and Bi2Te360,61, indicating their potential for a good thermoelectric performance. This is counter-intuitive that despite of their lower atomic masses P and As exhibit lower κ latt ; as in general compounds with heavier atoms results in low value of κ latt . The origin of this abnormal behavior in κ latt for P and As compounds have been discussed in ref.32. Another important parameter which governs the figure of merit is the electronic contribution to the thermal conductivity (κ e ). Here κ e is calculated by Wiedemann–Franz law.

### Figure of merit

Finally we model ZT as a function of the temperature as shown in Fig. 6 for p-type doping. For ZT max calculation, ZT is calculated as a function of carrier concentration at temperatures ranging from 100 K to 1000 K, and maximum value is shown in the plot. The maximum value of ZT increases with increasing doping levels and temperatures. A peak ZT of ~1.5 at 1000 K is found with a doping level of 7 × 1020 cm−3 for p-type doped La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4. The ZT under n-type doping is presented in the Supplementary Information Fig. S6. Under n-type doping due to low power-factor (thermopower) performance is rather poorer than that of p-type and a ZT of 0.75 was achieved for La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4. A lower ZT of 0.7 and 0.45 was achieved for La3Cu3Sb4/La3Cu3Bi4 under p-type and n-type doping due to their relatively lower thermopower/electrical conductivity and higher κ latt . It is noteworthy that experimental values of ZT will depend on actual scattering times, so the values reported here should be taken only as first estimates. None of the less, our results indicate the potential good thermoelectric performance of p-type La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 at high temperatures (~1000 K). As the efficient performance is predicted at high temperatures one concern in this regard could be the melting point of these compounds. A rough estimate of melting point around 2120 K for La3Cu3Sb4 was made by Fess et al.30 by fitting the thermal expansion coefficient (α). However, no study is available on actual thermal stability of these compounds, hence we restrict our ZT analysis to a much lower temperature of 1000 K. Our calculations show that if the La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 compounds remain stable at higher temperatures such as 1500 K a much higher ZT of >2 can be achieved. Our calculated ZT values are comparable with other state of the art p-type thermoelectric materials such as skutterudites (ZT = 0.9 at 800 K)62, PbTe (ZT = 1.8 at 900 K)63, SnTe (ZT = 1.1 at 800 K)64, and FeNbSb (ZT = 1.5 at 1200 K)65. Due to the various approximations involved in the theoretical calculations a quantitative comparison of ZT with the experimental measurements is often elusive. To put our calculated ZT values in real perspective we compare these with recent theoretical studies, where similar methodologies were employed. For instance a ZT of 1.75, 0.8, 1.75, 0.9, and 1.9 has been reported for Mg2Ge0.5Sn0.5 (1000 K)7, Bi2S3 (750 K)66, BaCd2Sb2 (950 K)67, WS2 (1500 K)68 and Si2Te3 (1000 K)69, respectively. Thus, the calculated ZT values of La based compounds are comparable with the other theoretically reported values for a variety of materials.

## Discussion

We present structural, electronic and thermoelectric properties of virtually unexplored La3Cu3X4 compounds. By using global structure search method with the particle swarm optimization algorithm we conclude that, the structure of La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 will be the same as other homologous compounds i.e. La3Cu3Sb4 and La3Cu3Bi4. The electronic structure calculations reveal that all four compounds studied here are semiconducting with the bandgaps in the range of 0.24 to 0.88 eV. This large bandgap for P and As compounds, while maintaining the high electrical conductivity results in nearly ~2 fold enhancement in thermopower when compared to the Sb and Bi compounds. Our results make clear that the La based ternary rare earth compounds studied here are quite likely to have high power factor, which together with low κ latt as discussed in ref.32 results in high figure of merit. In particular we report that a ZT of 1.5 can be achieved for La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 under p-type doping at a doping level of 7 × 1020 cm−3. Assuming that the relaxation time (τ) does not vary significantly among these compounds, we compare the 300 K calculated figure of merit with other homologous compounds, such as Y3Cu3Sb4, Ce3Cu3Sb4, and La3Cu3Sb4. All these compounds are narrow bandgap semiconductor with the bandgap in the range of 0.2–0.25 eV, and suffer from low figure of merit, mainly due to low thermopower (~50–100 μV/K at 300 K). For example at room temperature ZT values of 0.01, 0.03, and 0.015 have been reported for Y3Cu3Sb458, Ce3Cu3Sb430, and La3Cu3Sb430, respectively. Our calculated 300 K ZT value of 0.018 for La3Cu3Sb4 is in good agreement with experimentally measured value of 0.01530. It is noteworthy that all the previous ZT measurements for these compounds are limited to room temperature where efficient performance is unlikely. Even with the low thermal conductivity, our calculation for hole doped P and As compounds find a small ZT of 0.1 and 0.06 at room temperature. The origin of enhanced figure of merit for P and As compounds at high temperatures is related to (i) their relatively larger bandgap which results in large thermopower (powerfactor) at elevated temperatures and (ii) their low thermal conductivity (as discussed in ref.32). Our study demonstrates that if synthesized experimentally La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 can be potential high performance thermoelectric materials. For experimentally known and explored compounds (La3Cu3Sb4 and La3Cu3Bi4) our results imply that the measurements at high temperatures are required where better thermoelectric performance is anticipated. We hope that our current findings will stimulate future experimental exploration of the thermoelectric properties of these and other similar compounds.

## Methods

In order to predict the structure of La3Cu3P4 and La3Cu3As4 we use a global structure search method with the particle swarm optimization (PSO)41 algorithm as implemented in the Calypso code43. For structure prediction calculations the number of La3Cu3P4/La3Cu3As4 formula units per cell was allowed to vary from one (10 atoms) to four (40 atoms), and no restriction was placed on the space group. The number of structures in each generation was set to 40 and the total number of generations was 15 during the structure evolution. The structures generated by Calypso at each generation are then optimized to local minima and subsequently the total energies are calculated by using the VASP code70,71,72. For VASP calculations, we employ the projector augmented wave type pseudopotential and the Perdew Burke Ernzerhof (PBE) version of the exchange-correlation functional70,71,72. A 500 eV kinetic energy cutoff and Γ-centered k-mesh with k-spacing of 0.4/Å were used for structure relaxation and a denser k-mesh with k-spacing of 0.15/Å for total energy calculation. During structure relaxation, both lattice constants and atom coordinates are optimized until the forces on each atom were smaller than 0.005 eV/Å.

The electronic structure calculations were performed within density functional theory using the linearized augmented plane-wave (LAPW) method with local orbitals73,74 as implemented in the WIEN2K code75. The LAPW sphere radii were set to 2.5, 2.5, and 2.2 for La, Cu, and X, respectively. In addition Rk max  = 9.0, was used to ensure the well convergence of basis set, where R and k max are the smallest LAPW sphere radius and interstitial plane-wave cutoff, respectively. The Brillouin zone was sampled by taking 5000 k-points for all crystal structures. In order to obtain an accurate bandgap, we employed a modified Becke-Johnson functional of Tran and Blaha (TB-mBJ)76,77. Additionally, spin orbit coupling was incorporated to account for relativistic effects. The computed electronic structures with the TB-mBJ functional were also used to obtain transport coefficients with 30000 reducible k-points. The transport calculations were done by solving Boltzmann transport equation78 within the constant scattering time approximation (CSTA)78,79 as implemented in the BoltzTraP code80.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Gatti, C., Bertini, L., Blake, N. P. & Iversen, B. B. Guest-framework interaction in type I inorganic clathrates with promising thermoelectric properties: On the ionic versus neutral nature of the alkaline-earth metal guest A in A8Ga16Ge30 (A = Sr, Ba). Chem. Eur. J. 9, 4556–4568 (2003).

2. 2.

Stefanoski, S., Beekman, M. & Nolas, G. S. Inorganic clathrates for thermoelectric applications. In The Physics and Chemistry of Inorganic Clathrates, 169–191 (Springer, 2014).

3. 3.

Sales, B., Mandrus, D. & Williams, R. K. Filled skutterudite antimonides: a new class of thermoelectric materials. Science 272, 1325 (1996).

4. 4.

Shi, X. et al. Multiple-filled skutterudites: high thermoelectric figure of merit through separately optimizing electrical and thermal transports. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 7837–7846 (2011).

5. 5.

Shi, X. et al. Band structure engineering and thermoelectric properties of charge-compensated filled skutterudites. Sci. Rep. 5 (2015).

6. 6.

Liu, W. et al. Convergence of conduction bands as a means of enhancing thermoelectric performance of n-type Mg2Si1−x Sn x solid solutions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 166601 (2012).

7. 7.

Sun, J. & Singh, D. J. Thermoelectric properties of Mg2(Ge, Sn): Model and optimization of ZT. Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 024006 (2016).

8. 8.

Liu, W. et al. n-type thermoelectric material Mg2Sn0.75Ge0.25 for high power generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3269–3274 (2015).

9. 9.

Culp, S. R., Poon, S. J., Hickman, N., Tritt, T. M. & Blumm, J. Effect of substitutions on the thermoelectric figure of merit of half-heusler phases at 800 C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 1–3 (2006).

10. 10.

Yan, X. et al. Enhanced thermoelectric figure of merit of p-type half-heuslers. Nano Lett. 11, 556–560 (2010).

11. 11.

Joshi, G. et al. NbFeSb-based p-type half-heuslers for power generation applications. Energ. Environ. Sci. 7, 4070–4076 (2014).

12. 12.

Zhao, L.-D. et al. Ultralow thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric figure of merit in SnSe crystals. Nature 508, 373–377 (2014).

13. 13.

Ding, G., Gao, G. & Yao, K. High-efficient thermoelectric materials: The case of orthorhombic IV-VI compounds. Sci. Rep. 5 (2015).

14. 14.

Chen, X., Parker, D. & Singh, D. J. Importance of non-parabolic band effects in the thermoelectric properties of semiconductors. Sci. Rep. 3 (2013).

15. 15.

Girard, S. N. et al. High performance Na-doped PbTe-PbS thermoelectric materials: electronic density of states modification and shape-controlled nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 16588–16597 (2011).

16. 16.

Parker, D., Chen, X. & Singh, D. J. High three-dimensional thermoelectric performance from low-dimensional bands. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 146601 (2013).

17. 17.

Heremans, J. P. et al. Enhancement of thermoelectric efficiency in pbte by distortion of the electronic density of states. Science 321, 554–557 (2008).

18. 18.

Parker, D. S., May, A. F. & Singh, D. J. Benefits of carrier-pocket anisotropy to thermoelectric performance: The case of p-type AgBiSe2. Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 064003 (2015).

19. 19.

Hicks, L. & Dresselhaus, M. Effect of quantum-well structures on the thermoelectric figure of merit. Phys. Rev. B 47, 12727 (1993).

20. 20.

Harman, T., Taylor, P., Walsh, M. & LaForge, B. Quantum dot superlattice thermoelectric materials and devices. Science 297, 2229–2232 (2002).

21. 21.

Bilc, D. I., Hautier, G., Waroquiers, D., Rignanese, G.-M. & Ghosez, P. Low-dimensional transport and large thermoelectric power factors in bulk semiconductors by band engineering of highly directional electronic states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 136601 (2015).

22. 22.

Zhang, J. et al. Designing high-performance layered thermoelectric materials through orbital engineering. Nat. Commun. 7 (2016).

23. 23.

Samanta, A., Pandey, T. & Singh, A. K. Strain-induced electronic phase transition and strong enhancement of thermopower of TiS2. Phys. Rev. B 90, 174301 (2014).

24. 24.

Mahan, G. & Sofo, J. The best thermoelectric. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 7436–7439 (1996).

25. 25.

Lee, S., Park, J., Canfield, P. C. & Lynch, D. W. Optical properties and electronic structures of single crystalline RAl3 (R = Sc, Yb, and Lu). Phys. Rev. B 67, 075104 (2003).

26. 26.

Gonis, A., Kioussis, N. & Ciftan, M. Electron correlations and materials properties (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).

27. 27.

Van Daal, H., Van Aken, P. & Buschow, K. The seebeck coefficient of YbAl2 and YbAl3. Phys. Lett. A 49, 246–248 (1974).

28. 28.

Rowe, D., Kuznetsov, V., Kuznetsova, L. & Min, G. Electrical and thermal transport properties of intermediate-valence YbAl3. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35, 2183 (2002).

29. 29.

Kong, H., Shi, X., Uher, C. & Morelli, D. Thermoelectric properties of rare earth-ruthenium-germanium compounds. J. Appl. Phys. 102, 3702 (2007).

30. 30.

Fess, K. et al. Magnetic and thermoelectric properties of R3Cu3Sb4 (R = La, Ce, Gd, Er). J. Appl. Phys. 83, 2568–2573 (1998).

31. 31.

Hossain, Z. et al. Studies of structural, magnetic and transport properties of a new series R3Cu3Sb4 (R = La, Ce, Pr, Gd). IEEE Trans. Magn. 30 (1994).

32. 32.

Pandey, T., Polanco, C. A., Lindsay, L. & Parker, D. S. Lattice thermal transport in La3Cu3 X 4 compounds (x = P, As, Sb, Bi): Interplay of anharmonicity and scattering phase space. Phys. Rev. B 95, 224306 (2017).

33. 33.

Lu, Y. M., Fan, F., Cai, C. B., Cao, S. X. & Zhang, J. C. Y3Au3Sb4 type structure La3Cu3Bi4: synthesis, structure and property. J. Shanghai Univ. (English Edition) 12, 486–488 (2008).

34. 34.

Skolozdra, R., Salamakha, P., Ganzyuk, A. & Bodak, O. R3Cu3Sb4 (RY, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er) new intermetallic compounds with semiconductor properties. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk-Rossijskaya Akademiya Nauk. Neorganicheskie Materialy 29, 25–27 (1993).

35. 35.

Cava, R. et al. Crystal structure and elementary physical properties of La5Cu19P12 and Ce5Cu19P12. J. Solid State Chem. 121, 51–55 (1996).

36. 36.

Wang, J., Lee, K. & Kovnir, K. Distorted phosphorus and copper square-planar layers in LaCu1+x P2 and LaCu4P3: Synthesis, crystal structure, and physical properties. Inorg. Chem. 54, 890–897 (2014).

37. 37.

Wang, M., McDonald, R. & Mar, A. Nonstoichiometric rare-earth copper arsenides RECu1+x As2 (RE = La, Ce, Pr). J. Solid State Chem. 147, 140–145 (1999).

38. 38.

Trimarchi, G., Graf, P. & Zunger, A. Exploring the configurational space of binary alloys: Different sampling for different cell shapes. Phys. Rev. B 74, 014204 (2006).

39. 39.

Trimarchi, G., Freeman, A. J. & Zunger, A. Predicting stable stoichiometries of compounds via evolutionary global space-group optimization. Phys. Rev. B 80, 092101 (2009).

40. 40.

Gautier, R. et al. Prediction and accelerated laboratory discovery of previously unknown 18-electron ABX compounds. Nat. Chem. 7, 308–316 (2015).

41. 41.

Wang, Y., Lv, J., Zhu, L. & Ma, Y. Crystal structure prediction via particle-swarm optimization. Phys. Rev. B 82, 094116 (2010).

42. 42.

Oganov, A. R. & Colin, W. Glass. crystal structure prediction using evolutionary algorithms: principles and applications. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 244704 (2006).

43. 43.

Wang, Y., Lv, J., Zhu, L. & Ma, Y. CALYPSO: A method for crystal structure prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2063–2070 (2012).

44. 44.

Baker, H. Introduction to alloy phase diagrams. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 1992. 1. 1 (1992).

45. 45.

Jain, A. et al. The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).

46. 46.

Ong, S. P., Wang, L., Kang, B. & Ceder, G. Li-Fe-P-O2 phase diagram from first principles calculations. Chem. Mater. 20, 1798–1807 (2008).

47. 47.

Jain, A. et al. Formation enthalpies by mixing GGA and GGA + U calculations. Phys. Rev. B 84, 045115 (2011).

48. 48.

Curtarolo, S. et al. AFLOWLIB. ORG: A distributed materials properties repository from high-throughput ab initio calculations. Comp. Mater. Sci. 58, 227–235 (2012).

49. 49.

Curtarolo, S. et al. AFLOW: an automatic framework for high-throughput materials discovery. Comp. Mater. Sci. 58, 218–226 (2012).

50. 50.

Ong, S. P. et al. Python materials genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Computational Materials Science 68, 314–319 (2013).

51. 51.

Blendl, C. & Range, K. Cu3As4–eine kolumnarstruktur mit polykondensierten hetero-nuklearen cunean-einheiten. Z. Kristallogr 159, 17–18 (1982).

52. 52.

Zachwieja, U. & Jacobs, H. Ammonothermalsynthese von kupfernitrid, Cu3N. J. Less Common Metals 161, 175–184 (1990).

53. 53.

Gunzel, E. & Schubert, K. Strukturuntersuchungen im system kupfer-antimon. Z. Metallkde. 49, 124–133 (1958).

54. 54.

Ma, J. et al. Computational investigation of half-heusler compounds for spintronics applications. Phys. Rev. B 95, 024411 (2017).

55. 55.

Takegahara, K. & Kaneta, Y. Electronic band structures of f-electron ternary compounds with an energy gap. Prog. Theor. Phys. Supp. 108, 55–71 (1992).

56. 56.

Seibel, E. M., Xie, W., Gibson, Q. D. & Cava, R. J. Synthesis, structure, and basic magnetic and thermoelectric properties of the light lanthanide aurobismuthides. Inorg. Chem. 55, 3583–3588 (2016).

57. 57.

Parker, D. & Singh, D. J. Thermoelectric properties of AgGaTe2 and related chalcopyrite structure materials. Phys. Rev. B 85, 125209 (2012).

58. 58.

Candolfi, C. et al. Galvanomagnetic and thermoelectric properties of R3Cu3Sb4 compounds. In Thermoelectrics, 2006. ICT 06. 25th International Conference on, 674–677 (IEEE, 2006).

59. 59.

Devyatkova, E. & Smirnov, I. On the mechanism of current carrier scattering in lead telluride. Sov. Phys. Solid State 3, 1675–1680 (1962).

60. 60.

Goldsmid, H. The thermal conductivity of bismuth telluride. Proceedings of the Physical Society Sect. B 69, 203 (1956).

61. 61.

Satterthwaite, C. & Ure, R. Jr. Electrical and thermal properties of Bi2Te3. Phys. Rev. 108, 1164 (1957).

62. 62.

Liu, R. et al. p-type skutterudites R x M y Fe3CoSb12 (R, M = Ba, Ce, Nd, and Yb): Effectiveness of double-filling for the lattice thermal conductivity reduction. Intermetallics 19, 1747–1751 (2011).

63. 63.

Biswas, K. et al. High-performance bulk thermoelectrics with all-scale hierarchical architectures. Nature 489, 414–418 (2012).

64. 64.

Wang, L. et al. Manipulating band convergence and resonant state in thermoelectric material SnTe by Mn-In codoping. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 1203–1207 (2017).

65. 65.

Fu, C. et al. Realizing high figure of merit in heavy-band p-type half-heusler thermoelectric materials. Nat. Commun. 6 (2015).

66. 66.

Pandey, T. & Singh, A. K. Simultaneous enhancement of electrical conductivity and thermopower in Bi2S3 under hydrostatic pressure. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 1979–1987 (2016).

67. 67.

Pandey, T. & Singh, A. K. High thermopower and ultra low thermal conductivity in Cd-based Zintl phase compounds. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 16917–16926 (2015).

68. 68.

Gandi, A. N. & Schwingenschlogl, U. WS2 as an excellent high-temperature thermoelectric material. Chem. Mater. 26, 6628–6637 (2014).

69. 69.

Juneja, R., Pandey, T. & Singh, A. K. High thermoelectric performance in n-doped silicon-based chalcogenide Si2Te3. Chem. Mater. 29, 3723–3730 (2017).

70. 70.

Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

71. 71.

Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

72. 72.

Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

73. 73.

Sjostedt, E., Nordstrom, L. & Singh, D. J. An alternative way of linearizing the augmented plane-wave method. Solid State Commun. 114, 15–20 (2000).

74. 74.

Singh, D. J. & Nordstrom, L. Planewaves Pseudopotentials and the LAPW Method, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2006).

75. 75.

Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G. K. H., Kvasnicka, D. & Luitz, J. WIEN2K, An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn. Universität Wien, Austria, 2001).

76. 76.

Becke, A. D. & Johnson, E. R. A simple effective potential for exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 221101 (2006).

77. 77.

Tran, F. & Blaha, P. Accurate band gaps of semiconductors and insulators with a semilocal exchange-correlation potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 226401 (2009).

78. 78.

Ziman, J. M. Principles of the Theory of Solids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1964).

79. 79.

Ashcroft, N. W. & Mermin, D. N. Solid State Physics (Thomson Learning, Toronto, 1976).

80. 80.

Madsen, G. K. & Singh, D. J. Boltztrap. a code for calculating band-structure dependent quantities. Comput. Phys. Commun. 175, 67–71 (2006).

## Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division.

## Author information

### Affiliations

1. #### Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 37831, USA

• Tribhuwan Pandey
•  & David S. Parker

### Contributions

D.S.P. conceived the idea. T.P. conducted the calculations. T.P. and D.S.P. analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript.

### Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tribhuwan Pandey or David S. Parker.