Article | Open

# A suitable (wide-range + linear) temperature sensor based on Tm3+ ions

• Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 14113 (2017)
• doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14535-1
Accepted:
Published online:

## Abstract

Future advances in the broad fields of photonics, (nano-)electronics or even theranostics rely, in part, on the precise determination and control, with high sensitivity and speed, of the temperature of very well-defined spatial regions. Ideally, these temperature-sensors (T-sensors) should produce minimum (or no) disturbance in the probed regions, as well as to exhibit good resolution and significant dynamic range. Most of these features are consistent with the sharp and distinctive optical transitions of trivalent rare-earth (RE3+) ions that, additionally, are susceptible to their local environment and conditions. Altogether, these aspects form the basis of the present work, in which we propose a new T-sensor involving the light emission of trivalent thulium ions (Tm3+) embedded into crystalline TiO2. The optical characterization of the TiO2:Tm3+ system indicated a Tm3+-related emission at ~676 nm whose main spectral features are: (1) a temperature-induced wavelength shift of −2.2 pm K−1, (2) a rather small line-width increase over the ~85–750 K range, and (3) minimum data deconvolution-processing. The study also included the experimental data of the well-established pressure- and T-sensor ruby (Al2O3:Cr3+) and a comprehensive discussion concerning the identification and the excitation-recombination mechanisms of the Tm3+-related transitions.

## Introduction

Along with its fairly intuitive (though not simple) concept, the physical quantity temperature is present in most of the processes taking place in real world – with exceptional examples ranging from the atomic to the outer-space environments1,2. Indeed, temperature is essential in many biological-chemical-physical processes influencing their activation-maintenance-interruption and, most importantly, determining their efficiency and final products3. Notwithstanding its omnipresence and importance, there is no universal temperature sensor (T-sensor) that comply with the specificities of all (or most of) the probed objects in terms of: range, sensitivity, precision, time response, spatial resolution, and degree of interference, for example.

T-sensors can be separated into primary or secondary systems as they provide absolute temperature values (following state equations, for example) or rely on previous calibration, respectively. Both of them derive from T-induced variations of specific materials properties such as those involving: physical aspects (dimensions, pressure, velocity, density), electrical characteristics (resistance, difference of potential, Seebeck or Peltier effects), optical radiation (light absorption-emission-polarization, index of refraction, blackbody emission), and magnetic features (chemical shift, susceptibility)4. Within these, modern applications require T-sensors able to provide non-contact temperature measurements of regions down to the micrometer range5,6, as well as reliability, high sensitivity, speed, and linearity over a considerable temperature range7. Most of the above aspects are fulfilled by the optically-based methods, in which the temperature can be achieved by means of spectral analysis (wavelength position, intensity, shape, width, lifetime, or polarization dependence) of certain optical transitions.

A classical example of such optically-based T-sensor is ruby (Al2O3 doped with Cr3+ ions) that is a standard pressure-sensor as well8,9. For that purpose, the light emission at ~693 nm (corresponding to the R1 transition of Cr3+ ions) is frequently used10, rendering quite impressive wavelength shifts, i.e.: $Δ λ R 1 (T)$ = +7.7 pm K−18, and $Δ λ R 1 (P)$ = +36.5 pm kbar−111. Even though these outstanding figures and widespread use, as far as temperature measurements are concerned, the spectral features provided by ruby crystals lack from good linearity and spatial resolution. More specifically, R1 ruby-related wavelength shift is linear only in the ~300–600 K range8, and no successful temperature-mapping (or -imaging) experiments were reported to date.

In addition to ruby, other optically-based T-sensors include the use of organic dyes12,13, semiconductor quantum-dots14,15, rare-earth ions16,17,18,19, and luminescent (bio-)polymers20,21, for example. As expected, each of the above T-sensors are best suited for a specific range of temperatures and their sensitivities depend on the optical spectrum characteristics (Table 2 of ref.5, for example, presents an excellent overview with the typical sensitivities and range of temperatures of most of the above T-sensors).

Within this context, the T-sensors based on rare-earth ions are of special importance because of features such as: constant thermal sensitivity (as denoted by a linear behavior over a considerable range of temperatures), and no photo-degradation nor stability problems (in contrast to organic-based materials and quantum-dot structures). Furthermore, the list of rare-earth ions allows different options of photon excitation-emission (practically along the entire UV-VIS-NIR range), and compatibility with various classes of (in)organic materials (in the form of solids, liquids, nano- or micro-composites etc.) that, traditionally, have been considered for the development of rare-earth-based light-emitting sources. This is particularly true for trivalent thulium (Tm3+) ions that, so far, had presented laser action at multiple wavelengths22,23, as well as a few examples of their potential as a T-sensor24. In this last case, however, the T-sensor was based on the lifetime decay of the Tm3+-related integrated signal in the 1000–1700 nm NIR region, after excitation with 800 nm photons. According to the experimental results, excellent fluorescence stability and good temperature sensitivity (~3 μs K−1), in the ~298–1675 K range, were achieved from a Tm3+-doped YAG (or Y3Al5O12) optical fiber25,26.

Despite the use of Tm3+ ions, we adopted a completely different approach in the present contribution. More specifically: the optically-active Tm3+ ions were embedded into a crystalline TiO2 film, and the desired temperature was determined from the shift experienced by the Tm3+-related emission at ~676 nm. Moreover: such wavelength shift proved to be rather linear (−2.2 pm K−1) in the ~85–750 K range, and required almost no spectra deconvolution-analysis. Because this is the first time the wavelength shift of the Tm3+-related is being proposed as a T-sensor, the work also contains a comprehensible discussion involving the main optical excitation-recombination mechanisms of the Tm3+ ions. A few practical applications that could be benefited from the present Tm3+-based T-sensor are outlined as well.

## Results and Discussion

The photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of the TiO2:Tm3+ sample is displayed in Fig. 1 The spectrum was obtained at room-temperature by exciting the sample with 488.0 nm photons, and shows three Tm3+-related optical transitions in the 640–690 nm wavelength range, along with a Tm3+ energy levels diagram (inset of Fig. 1).Considering the absence of spectroscopic data of Tm3+ ions in the TiO2 matrix, the present PL assignment was based on previous works involving Tm3+ embedded into YCl327 and KYb(WO4)2 crystals28. Furthermore, for simplicity reasons, only three Stark levels have been assumed, which were associated to the lowest (index 0), central (index 1), and highest (index 2) energy values found in the studies of YCl3:Tm3+ and KYb(WO4)2:Tm3+. According to this procedure, the main PL lines observed in Fig. 1 are due to the following transitions: 3F2,23H6,2 (at ~656 nm), 3F2,0-13H6,2 (at ~660 nm), and 3F3,0-13H6,0-1 (at ~676 nm) [Supplementary Figure S1]. Likewise, the photon excitation with 488.0 nm photons is quasi-resonant with the 3H6,0-21G4,0-2 transition.

In addition to these, other optical emissions were observed in the 500–850 nm interval: either due to Tm3+ ions (at ~560 and 790 nm, ascribed to the 3F33H5, and 1G43H5 or 3F43H6 transitions, respectively), or originating from the TiO2 matrix (>800 nm)29.

As indicated by the room-temperature spectrum of Fig. 1, the Tm3+-related optical emissions are well-defined, background-free, and rather sharp. Nonetheless, the most remarkable feature of the Tm3+-related signal involves the temperature-induced wavelength shift of the 3F3,0-13H6,0-1 (at ~676 nm) transition, without major changes in the overall spectrum (Fig. 2). Such behavior is in contrast with that exhibited by the traditional optically-based T-sensor ruby8, for example, in which case the spectral line-width and, consequently, temperature precision are highly affected at increasing temperatures.

The analysis of the Tm3+-related PL(T) spectra indicate that the 3F3,0-13H6,0-1 transition experienced a linear, wavelength shift dλ/dT of −2.2 pm K−1 (or +0.048 cm−1 K−1), with a 1.25 nm (or 55 cm−1) line-width increase, along the entire ~85–750 K measured range. Also, the PL signal intensity IPL changed for only two orders of magnitude and the spectral analysis required almost no data processing, except for the fitting of a Lorentzian function to the 3F3,0-13H6,0-1 transition signal [Supplementary Figure S2].

Analogously, for the R1 and R2 ruby lines (measured and analyzed in the very same way): (1) the wavelength shifts were higher (+7.7 pm K−1 or −0.16 cm−1 K−1), but presented a linear behavior only in the ~300–600 K interval, (2) from ~85 to 750 K, the corresponding line-widths increase were R1 ~ 6.8 nm (or 280 cm−1) and R2 ~ 2.6 nm (or 109 cm−1), (3) the IPL signal experienced a three orders of magnitude variation, and (4) above ~400 K there was a considerable overlapping of the R1-R2 lines which influenced the wavelength accuracy [Supplementary Figure S3].

Most of the above features are displayed in Figs 3 and 4, in which the error bars took into account: the experimental resolution (~1 cm−1), different measurement runs, and data processing-analysis (involving changes due to background removal, for example).

Figure 3 shows the peak wavelength of the Tm3+ and Cr3+ ions, as experimentally determined in the ~85–750 K range. The figure also presents the mathematical fittings of the Tm3+-related experimental data [$λ Tm 3 + (T)$ = 676.9 − 2.2 × 10−3 T nm], as well as those obtained by Ragan et al.8 in ruby [$λ R 1 (T)$ = 693.34 − 2.17 × 10−3 T + 2.31 × 10−5 T2 − 1.78 × 10−7 T3 nm and $λ R 2 (T)$ = 691.94 − 1.44 × 10−3 T + 1.86 × 10−5 T2 − 1.21 × 10−8 T3 nm – in the 0–300 K interval]. Not only the gradient and linearity of the curves are different but, interestingly, the wavelength shifts presented by both ions are contrary: negative for Tm3+ ions (blue-shift), and positive for Cr3+ (red-shift).

All of these characteristics derive from the properties of each ion as well as from the ion-host interaction and, part of them, were reported in the literature30,31,32. Basically, when embedded into a crystal host, impurities (like the Tm3+ or Cr3+ ions, for example) move around their equilibrium positions giving rise to lattice vibrations. Optical transitions between any two levels of these impurities can be brought about in, at least, two ways: (a) a direct or electron-phonon EP process (transition from one level to another such that any energy difference is compensated by phonon absorption or emission, to allow the transition), and (b) a Raman process (the transition is made possible by energy variations due to phonon scattering).

As expected, both EP and Raman processes are dependent on temperature and, ultimately, affects the wavelength and line-width of the transitions. In the former case, the T-induced wavelength shifts are associated with variations of the crystal field energy because of local lattice vibrations. In the latter, the line-width changes as a result of the transitions between the crystal field levels stimulated by interaction with the acoustical phonon field. Roughly, the T-induced variations in the spectral characteristics of any transition can be described by31:

$E(T)=E(0)+ E direct (T)+ E Raman (T)andΓ(T)=Γ(0)+ Γ direct (T)+ Γ Raman (T)$
(1)

where E and Γ stand for the energy and line-width of the transition, respectively. Moreover: the first terms [E(0) and Γ(0)] account for the T-independent or static-like interactions (crystal field interaction, nephelauxetic effect, strain-stress, for example), the index “direct” stand for the direct processes (EP interactions and those ones associated with non-harmonic effects like thermal expansion-compression33), and the index “Raman” denotes the processes involving the scattering of phonons. The formal description of the E(T) and Γ(T) quantities are based on the Hamiltonian of the impurity-phonon system and the Debye model for the phonon distribution. It involves a lot of adjustable-unknown parameters and, in most of the cases, it reproduces the experimental results at the expense of unreliable-conflicting values (Debye temperature and phonon frequency different from those available in literature, different coupling factors for the very same transition, different E(0) and Γ(0) values for the very same material etc.).

In spite of this limitation, the model is very instructive to indicate the origin of the observed red- and blue-shifts. According to the model, the red-shift is typical of impurity–matrix systems in which the EP interactions and/or phonon scattering processes are predominant, as verified in ruby (Al2O3:Cr3+)30, and YAG:Cr3+34. Blue-shifts, on the contrary, are typical of the rare-earth ions because of the strong non-harmonic influence31,33,35,36. In fact, the primacy of the EP interactions and/or phonon-scattering processes are consistent with the great changes observed in the IPL and line-width of the Cr3+-related transitions [Fig. 4(c,d)], that are also susceptible to strain-stress and concentration details37.

Concerning the peculiar IPL behavior presented by the TiO2:Tm3+ sample [Fig. 4(a)], it originates because of variations in the energy of the Tm3+ levels and the quasi-resonant photon excitation process. More precisely, IPL is highest when photon absorption is maximum, i.e., around room-temperature due to the almost perfect match between the 3H6,0-21G4,0-2 transition and the 488.0 nm photon energy. Below, or above, room-temperature the energy of the 1G4,0-2 levels change such that the photon absorption process is incomplete, rendering some decrease of IPL. Likewise, the T-induced energy variation of certain levels is the origin of the wavelength shift values presented by the Tm3+ and Cr3+ ions.

Despite their inherent energy levels arrangement, both Tm3+ and Cr3+ ions are influenced by their local atomic surroundings which, in essence, are decided by external agents like temperature, pressure, electromagnetic fields etc. Such ion–host correlation is usually expressed in terms of the crystalline-field theory, that has been extensively considered in the study of rare-earth (RE) and transition-metal (TM) ions38,39.

According to this approach, RE3+/2+ ions appear to be the less affected by the so-called crystalline-field effects. It happens because of the outer 5 s and 5p orbitals that partially shield the intra-4f transitions of the RE3+ or RE2+ ions – in contrast to the TM3+-related transitions that take place at the vulnerable 3d orbitals. Nonetheless, the local atomic environment changes the RE3+/2+-related transitions, and its final effects can be enhanced depending on the ion–host characteristics, as verified in this work.

Based on the present experimental results, the wavelength-shift experienced by Tm3+, at ~676 nm, corresponds to almost 30% that of Cr3+. The wavelength-shifts of the other Tm3+-related transitions (at ~656 and 660 nm) are well-defined and linear as well, but presented a smaller rate: dλ/dT (3F2,23H6,2) = dλ/dT (3F2,0-13H6,2) = −1.1 pm K−1 [Supplementary Figure S4]. These figures not only are consistent with the crystalline-field theory (in the sense that RE3+/2+ ions are less sensitive than TM3+ ions), but are similar to those achieved from other RE3+/2+ ions: Eu3+ in YAG with dλ/dt = −0.5 pm K−1 (or +0.015 cm−1 K−1) and a linear 293–1073 K range40; Sm3+ in YAG with dλ/dt = −0.7 pm K−1 (or +0.018 cm−1 K−1) and a linear 300–873 K range36; Sm3+ in TiO2 with dλ/dt = −0.7 pm K−1 (or +0.017 cm−1 K−1) and a linear 83–750 K range41 [Supplementary Figure S5]; Sm2+ in SrB4O7 with dλ/dt = −0.1 pm K−1 (or +0.002 cm−1 K−1) and a linear 293–673 K range42. The only exception to these values applies to the Tm3+-related transition at ~676 nm, in which dλ/dT = −2.2 pm K−1 (or +0.048 cm−1 K−1) is, at least, 2–3 times higher than other RE3+/2+ ions. This can be seen in Fig. 5 that shows the wavelength shifts of Tm3+ (at ~676 nm), Sm3+ (one of those exhibiting the highest slopes amongst the RE ions, at ~612 nm), and Cr3+ ions (representing the standard optically-based T-sensor).

Within the possible reasons that explain the wavelength-shift presented by the TiO2:Tm3+ sample we can mention: (a) the arrangement of Tm3+-related energy levels, as imposed by the TiO2 host; and (b) the TiO2 host in the form of a thin film, aggregating to the already existing T-induced crystalline-field and non-harmonic effects, those ones due to the T-induced film-substrate interaction. Though reasonable, the film-substrate interaction is a hypothesis that requires the systematic investigation of a bulk TiO2:Tm3+ sample for validation. Therefore, the main spectroscopic features of the TiO2:Tm3+ system can be summarized as: (1) TiO2 is a wide bandgap material that is able to produce considerable field distortion around the Tm3+ ions; (2) the 3F2,23H6,2, 3F2,0-13H6,2, and 3F3,0-13H6,0-1 transitions take place at ~656, 660, and 676 nm, respectively; (3) temperature determines the crystalline-field and gives rise to non-harmonic effects like thermal compression-expansion; (4) as the temperature advances, the mutual play of these effects provokes the separation of the Tm3+-related energy levels and, ultimately, the blue-shift of all transitions; and (5) optical transitions ending at the 3H6,2 state (i.e., 3F2,23H6,2 and 3F2,0-13H6,2) present a smaller blue-shift than those involving the lowest 3H6,0-1 ground states (3F3,0-13H6,0-1) – in accord with quantum mechanics principles31.

In summary, the TiO2:Tm3+ system represents a very convenient option to the ever-increasing area of optically-based temperature sensors. Along with its many interesting characteristics (linear blue-shift over a quite large T-range, visible light emission with no great line-width variation, and no need of hard spectrum processing), the system comprises the inert-biocompatible TiO2 matrix. Indeed, the whole procedure (sample production + optical excitation/detection + spectrum analysis) involves rather simple instrumentation which, allied to its sensitivity, suggests the potential of the TiO2:Tm3+ system as an suitable T-sensor in photonics, (nano-)electronics, theranostics43,44,45, thermal imaging-mapping etc. Moreover, in the form of a thin film, the TiO2:Tm3+ system allows its attachment (instant or permanent) to almost any solid surface – ideally in the 1–10−9 m range – without generating great temperature variations.

### Concluding remarks

We reported on the use of Tm3+ ions as an optically-based temperature-sensor. The Tm3+ ions were embedded into a crystalline TiO2 film, and the actual temperature was determined from the shift experienced by the Tm3+-related emission at ~676 nm. Were applicable, the work compared the spectroscopic data of the Tm3+ ions with those of the well-established pressure- and T-sensor ruby (Al2O3:Cr3+). In contrast to ruby, the experimental results indicated that the Tm3+-related wavelength shift is rather linear and required almost no spectra deconvolution-analysis. Also, whereas the Cr3+ ions showed a red-shift of +7.7 pm K−1, the Tm3+ ions exhibited a smaller (−2.2 pm K−1) blue-shift, though over a considerable dynamic range (83–750 K).

We also presented a comprehensive discussion concerning the Tm3+-related transitions as well as the T-induced factors that most affect their wavelength shift.

The present experimental results suggest the suitability of the TiO2:Tm3+ system as an optically-based T-sensor in terms of its simplicity, sensitivity, and wide linear dynamic range. Future work, however, should consider its spatial resolution as well as its real operation in photonics, (nano-)electronics, and biological applications, for example.

## Methods

The present thulium-doped TiO2 sample was deposited onto a crystalline silicon substrate by sputtering a high purity Titanium + Thulium solid target (properly adjusted according to the Ti and Tm relative areas and sputtering yields46) to generate a Tm concentration around 0.5 at.%18. During deposition, the Ti + Tm target was bombarded by a beam of Ar+ ions (1.5 keV and nominal current ~13 mA/cm2) that was generated by a Kaufman cell. The whole procedure was carried out in a high vacuum chamber under an atmosphere of pure oxygen (5 × 10−4 mbar), by keeping the crystalline silicon substrate at 473 K. Under these conditions, after 120 min, a 300 nm thick uniform film was obtained.

Subsequently, the Tm-doped TiO2 sample was cut into 1 cm2 pieces and one of them was annealed at 873 K under a flow of oxygen gas at atmospheric pressure, during 30 min. All samples – as-deposited and after thermal annealing – were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, and photoluminescence (PL) experiments. Whereas the XPS analysis confirmed the presence of ~0.5 at.% of Tm in the TiO2 films, both XRD and Raman measurements indicated their amorphous to crystalline transformation (predominantly in the Anatase phase) after thermal annealing at 873 K [Supplementary Figure S6].

The PL experiments were carried out in a commercial micro-Raman setup (Renishaw RM2000) by exciting the Tm-doped TiO2 sample with 488.0 nm photons. The temperature-dependent spectra were obtained in the 83–773 K range by means of a computer-controlled T-stage (Linkam THMS 600). Further information concerning the sample deposition conditions (and method47) and characterization details can be found elsewhere41.

For comparison purposes, a Sm-doped TiO2 film (deposited and annealed following exactly the same procedure above described) and a natural ruby sample (Cr-doped Al2O3) had their photoluminescence investigated in detail. Given the high temperature sensitivity of the samples under investigation, the PL measurements were conducted at the lowest laser excitation power density (~2 mW μm−2). Following this condition, all observed spectral variations (wavelength shift, line-width, and signal intensity) are exempt from experimental artifacts. Accordingly, all PL(T) measurements shared the same experimental accuracy, i.e.: ~1 cm−1 (spectral) and <0.2 K (reproducibly achieved after 2 min of thermal stabilization).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Quinn, T. J. Temperature Chapter 1 (Academic Press Inc., Orlando USA, 1983).

2. 2.

Chang, H. Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress Chapters 4 and 5 (Oxford University Press, New York USA, 2004).

3. 3.

Atkins, P. W. Physical chemistry Chapters 2 and 3 (Oxford University Press, New York USA, 1994).

4. 4.

Schooley, J. F. Thermometry Chapters 5 and 6.(CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton USA, 1988).

5. 5.

Brites, C. D. S. et al. Thermometry at the nanoscale. Nanoscale 4, 4799–4829 (2012).

6. 6.

Jaque, D. & Vetrone, F. Luminescence nanothermometry. Nanoscale 4, 4301–4326 (2012).

7. 7.

Khalid, A. H. & Kontis, K. Thermographic phosphors for high temperature measurements: Principles, current state of the art and recent applications. Sensors 8, 5673–5744 (2008).

8. 8.

Ragan, D. D., Gustavsen, R. & Schiferl, D. Calibration of the ruby R1 and R2 fluorescence shifts as a function of temperature from 0 to 600 K. J. Appl. Phys. 72, 5539–5544 (1992).

9. 9.

Goncharov, A. F., Zaug, J. M. & Crowhurst, J. C. Optical calibration of pressure sensors for high pressures and temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 094917–1-5 (2005).

10. 10.

Henderson, B. & Imbusch, G. F. Optical spectroscopy of inorganic solids Chapter 9 (Oxford University Press, New York USA, 1989).

11. 11.

Piermarini, G. J., Block, S., Barnett, J. D. & Forman, R. A. Calibration of the pressure dependence of the R1 ruby fluorescence line to 195 kbar. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 2774–2780 (1975).

12. 12.

Ross, D., Gaitan, M. & Locascio, L. E. Temperature measurement in microfluidic systems using a temperature-dependent fluorescent dye. Anal. Chem. 73, 4117–4123 (2001).

13. 13.

Benninger, R. K. P. et al. Quantitative 3d mapping of fluidic temperatures within microchannel networks using fluorescence lifetime imaging. Anal. Chem. 78, 2272–2278 (2006).

14. 14.

Vlaskin, V. A., Janssen, N., Rijssel, J. V., Beaulac, R. & Gamelin, D. R. Tunable dual emission in doped semiconductor nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 10, 3670–3674 (2010).

15. 15.

Maestro, L. M. et al. CdSe quantum dots for two-photon fluorescence thermal imaging. Nano Lett. 10, 5109–5115 (2010).

16. 16.

Carlson, M. T., Khan, A. & Richardson, H. H. Local temperature determination of optically excited nanoparticles and nanodots. Nano Lett. 11, 1061–1069 (2011).

17. 17.

Gonzalez, P. H. et al. Evaluation of rare-earth-doped silica sub-micrometric spheres as optically controlled temperature sensors. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 054702–1-7 (2012).

18. 18.

Scoca, D., Morales, M., Merlo, R., Alvarez, F. & Zanatta, A. R. Photoluminescence and compositional-structural properties of ion-beam sputter deposited Er-doped TiO2-xNx films: Their potential as a temperature sensor. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 205304–1-6 (2015).

19. 19.

Manzani, D., Petruci, J. F. S., Nigoghossian, K., Cardoso, A. A. & Ribeiro, S. A portable luminescent thermometer based on green up-conversion emission of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped tellurite glass. Sci. Rep. 7, 41596–1-11 (2017).

20. 20.

Pietsch, C., Vollrath, A., Hoogenboom, R. & Schubert, U. S. A fluorescent thermometer based on a pyrene-labeled thermoresponsive polymer. Sensors 10, 7979–7990 (2010).

21. 21.

Okabe, K. et al. Intracellular temperature mapping with a fluorescent polymeric thermometer and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Nat. Commun. 3, 705–1-9 (2012).

22. 22.

Kaminskii, A. A. Laser crystals and ceramics: Recent advances. Laser & Photon. Rev. 1, 93–177 (2007).

23. 23.

Wen, X. et al. Highly Tm3+ doped germanate glass and its single mode fiber for 2.0 μm laser. Sci. Rep. 6, 20344–1-10 (2016).

24. 24.

Grattan, K. T. V. & Zhang, Z. Y. Fiber optic fluorescence thermometry (Chapman & Hall, New York USA, 1995).

25. 25.

Zhang, Z. Y., Grattan, K. T. V. & Meggitt, B. T. Thulium-doped fiber optic decay-time temperature sensors: Characterization of high temperature performance. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 1614–1620 (2000).

26. 26.

Shen, Y., Zhao, W., He, J., Sun, T. & Grattan, K. T. V. Fluorescence decay characteristic of Tm-doped YAG crystal fiber for sensor applications, investigated from room temperature to 1400 °C. IEEE Sensors Journal 3, 507–512 (2003).

27. 27.

Dieke, G. H. Spectra and energy levels of rare-earth ions in crystals Chapter 13 (Wiley Interscience, New York USA, 1968).

28. 28.

Pujol, M. C. et al. Crystal growth and spectroscopic characterization of Tm3+-doped KYb(WO4)2 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 66, 144304–1-8 (2002).

29. 29.

Montoncello, F. et al. Near-infrared photoluminescence in titania: Evidence for phonon-replica effect. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 1501–1505 (2003).

30. 30.

McCumber, D. E. & Sturge, M. D. Linewidth and temperature shift of the R lines in ruby. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1682–1684 (1963).

31. 31.

Kushida, T. Linewidths and thermal shifts of spectral lines in Nd-doped yttrium aluminum garnet and calcium fluorophosphate. Phys. Rev. 185, 500–508 (1969).

32. 32.

Hüfner, S. Optical spectra of transparent rare-earth compounds Chapter 4 (Academic Press Inc., New York USA, 1978).

33. 33.

Kuznetsov, A., Laissar, A. & Kikas, J. Temperature dependence of spectral position and widths of 5DJ7FJ fluorescence lines originating from Sm2+ ions in SrFCl crystals. Opt. Mater. 32, 1671–1675 (2010).

34. 34.

Zheng, W. C., Li, B. X. & Feng, G. Y. Thermal shifts and electron-phonon coupling parameters of the R-lines for Cr3+ ion in Y3Al5O12 crystal. Opt. Mater. 35, 626–628 (2013).

35. 35.

Hess, N. J. & Schiferl, D. Pressure and temperature dependence of laser-induced fluorescence of Sm:YAG to 100 kbar and 700 °C and an empirical model. J. Appl. Phys. 68, 1953–1960 (1990).

36. 36.

Valle, C. S., Daniel, I., Reynard, B., Abraham, R. & Goutaudier, C. Optimization of Sm3+ fluorescence in Sm-doped yttrium aluminum garnet: Application to pressure calibration in diamond-anvil cell at high temperature. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 4349–4353 (2002).

37. 37.

Piermarini, G. J., Block, S. & Barnett, J. D. Hydrostatic limits in liquids and solids to 100 kbar. J. Appl. Phys. 44, 5377–5382 (1973).

38. 38.

Blasse, G. & Grabmaier, B. C. Luminescent materials Chapters 1 & 3 (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg GER, 1984).

39. 39.

Solé, J. G., Bausá, L. E. & Jaque, D. An introduction to the optical spectroscopy of inorganic solids Chapter 6 (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester UK, 2005).

40. 40.

Arashi, H. & Ishigame, M. Diamond anvil cell and pressure sensor for high-temperature use. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 21, 1647–1649 (1982).

41. 41.

Scoca, D., Zanatta, A. R. & Alvarez, F. On the optical-electronic properties of TiO2 films doped with Sm, Tb, and Sm + Tb. (unpublished).

42. 42.

Lacam, A. & Chateau, C. High-pressure measurements at moderate temperatures in a diamond anvil cell with a new optical sensor: SrB4O7:Sm2+. J. Appl. Phys. 66, 366–372 (1989).

43. 43.

Hao, S., Chen, G. & Yang, C. Sensing using rare-earth-doped upconversion nano-particles. Theranostics 3, 331–345 (2013).

44. 44.

Naczynski, D. J. et al. Rare-earth-doped biological composites as in vivo shortwave infrared detectors. Nat. Commun. 4, 2199–1-10 (2013).

45. 45.

Shen, J., Sun, L. D. & Yan, C. H. Luminescent rare-earth nano-materials for bio-probe applications. Dalton Trans. 42, 5687–5697 (2008).

46. 46.

Vossen, J. L. & Cuomo, J. J. ThinFilm Processes Chapter II-1 (Eds Vossen, J. L. & Kern, W.) (Academic Press Inc., New York, NY 1978).

47. 47.

Hammer, P., Victoria, N. M. & Alvarez, F. Electronic structure of hydrogenated carbon nitride films. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 2941–2949 (1998).

## Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Brazilian agencies FAPESP (grant 2012/10127-5), CNPq (A.R.Z. and F.A.), and CAPES (D.S.).

## Author information

### Affiliations

1. #### Instituto de Física de São Carlos, USP, São Carlos, 13560-970, SP, Brazil

• A. R. Zanatta
2. #### Instituto de Física Gleb Wataghin, UNICAMP, Campinas, 13083-859, SP, Brazil

• D. Scoca
•  & F. Alvarez

### Contributions

This paper is part of the D.S.’s PhD thesis. A.R.Z., D.S. and F.A. have conceived and discussed the whole experimental work. D.S. made the Tm- and Sm-doped TiO2 samples and carried out the XPS and XRD measurements. Along with A.R.Z., D.S. performed the sample processing and Raman and PL(T) experiments. All authors contributed with the data analysis and with the writing/editing of the manuscript.

### Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. R. Zanatta.