Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Catastrophic failure of nacre under pure shear stresses of torsion

Abstract

Nacre, a composite made from biogenic aragonite and proteins, exhibits excellent strength and toughness. Here, we show that nacreous sections can exhibit complete brittle fracture along the tablet interfaces at the proportional limit under pure shear stresses of torsion. We quantitatively separate the initial tablet sliding primarily resisted by nanoscale aragonite pillars from the following sliding resisted by various microscale toughening mechanisms. We postulate that the ductility of nacre can be limited by eliminating tablet interactions during crack propagations. Our findings should help pursuing further insights of layered materials by using torsion.

Introduction

Nacre is a hierarchical material with extraordinary strength and toughness1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Composed of ~95% aragonite and ~5% protein, nacreous structures exhibit orders of magnitude higher toughness than their brittle aragonite constituents primarily due to nano- and microscale brick-and-mortar structures1,4,13,14,15,16,17. Different toughening mechanisms have been proposed to explain the mechanical behavior of nacre. At the nanoscale, the sliding of nacreous tables are resisted by nanopillars (i.e., mineral bridges)18,19,20,21, contacts of nanoasperities20,22,23,24 and the unfolding of protein chains25. At the microscale, interactions of wavy tablets26,27, crack deflections and pulling out of tablets28 provide essential resistance to the nacreous deformation. Despite prior studies, it is still difficult to quantify how various nanoscale toughening mechanisms contribute to the shear resistance in the initial sliding of nacreous tablets. It is also unclear how nacre exhibits brittle behavior under different stress conditions. In this work, we employ pure shear stresses of torsion to investigate the mechanical properties of nacre in red abalone, and to further elucidate the evolution of toughening mechanisms during the deformation of nacre.

We focus on separating adjacent nacreous tablets using pure shear stresses of torsion29,30. We created composite dog-bone shaped specimens using the pure nacreous sections without any growth layers21,31,32,33 from a red abalone shell. The hexagonal surfaces of aragonite tablets are perpendicular to the cylindrical axis (Fig. 1b). For a shaft under torsion, pure shear stresses exist in every two-dimensional cross-sectional planes over the entire gauge section. This feature enables the nanoscale interfaces between nacreous tablets to be tested successfully. The shear stress and strain in torsion are described by

$$\tau =\frac{T\cdot \rho }{J}$$
(1)
$${s}_{max}={\rm{\Delta }}\theta \cdot r={\gamma }_{max}\cdot l$$
(2)

Where τ is the shear stress on the horizontal plane of the gauge section, T is the torque, r is the gauge section radius, ρ is the distance between an arbitrary point on the cross section to the center varying from 0 to r, J = 0.5πr 4 is the polar moment of inertia, γ max is the shear strain at the external edge, s max , Δθ, and l are the sliding distance at the external edge, twisting angle, and height of two vertically adjacent tablets, respectively. Since nacre specimens are transversely isotropic, shear stresses increase linearly from zero in the center to the maximum in the external edge before the specimen fails. τ b represents the shear stress distribution before the specimen failure. Once the external aragonite tablets fail, large gradients of shear stresses occur radially due to the rapid decrease in the polar moment of inertia, which is a fourth-order function of the cylindrical radius. These gradients promote fast crack propagations radially until the specimen fails completely. τ a represents the shear stress distribution after the specimen failure. In this study, the failure of specimens is achieved when the interfacial shear strength is reached. The maximum tablet sliding distance upon failure is measured as the maximum rotational distance between two vertically adjacent brick layers at the external edge. The shear strain is the ratio between the sliding distance and the height of adjacent tablets (Fig. 1c). In the experiments (Fig. 1a), the axial load was precisely controlled (~0.22 N), and the catastrophic failure after peak load was detailed using data collected at a high sampling rate (200,000 samples per second).

Figure 1
figure1

Schematics of the experimental system. (a) The dual system that includes an axial-torsional load cell (4.4 kN and 56.4 Nm) at the sampling rate of 50 samples per second and a torsional load cell (2.8 Nm) at the sampling rate of 200,000 samples per second. (b) Distributions of pure shear stresses of torsion before (τ b) and after (τ a) the failure of nacre specimens. Arrows 1 and 2 denote the sliding and crack directions, respectively. (c) A close view of two tablets at the external edge of the gauge section subjected to the maximum shear stress (τ m) before failure. This geometrical model was used in the finite element analysis.

Results and Discussion

Pure shear stresses generate complete brittle fracture of nacre

A total of five successful composite dog-bone shaped nacre specimens were created due to the scarce of pure nacre sections in red abalone shells. For each specimen, the torque-rotation curve collected during quasi-static monotonic torsional tests exhibits an increase and a sharp drop (Fig. 2a). The increase segments are almost linear since R2 values of the linear fitting are above 0.99 for all specimens (Fig. 2c). The shear strength is 41.5 ± 14.7 MPa at 2.0 ± 0.8% strain. The variation is due to the specimen locations in the red abalone shell. The post-peak curves are nearly vertical, showing that catastrophic failures happen in a short time (Fig. 2a and b). In comparison, single-crystal aragonite minerals were shaped to the same size and orientation of nacreous specimens. The shear strength of aragonite is 14.5 ± 2.2 MPa at 1.4 ± 0.2% strain. Although the R2 values of aragonite segments are close to unity, the relatively flat drop (Fig. 2b) indicates that crack propagations are affected by the spiral fractural surfaces (Fig. 3d). For the same geometry, cracks travel faster between the nacreous tablets than in aragonite minerals since the dropping periods of nacre specimens last shorter (5.0 ± 2.0 milliseconds) than those of aragonite specimens (20.0 ± 0.6 milliseconds). By discretizing the twisting angle of the gauge section to the rotational angle of two adjacent tablets, the measured sliding distance at the external edge in the initial stage is ~20 nm (20.0 ± 8.4 nm) that agrees with prior estimations22.

Figure 2
figure2

Monotonic torsional tests for nacre and aragonite specimens. (a) Shear stress-stress curves. (b) Post-peak drop periods with respect to time. (c) R2 values of the linear-fitting for the increase segments. (d) Sliding distances of adjacent nacreous tablets.

Figure 3
figure3

Fractographic characterization. (a) A representative dog-bone shaped nacre specimen. (b) and (c) Optical and SEM images of the fractured nacre half, respectively. (d) A microCT image of a fractured aragonite half under torsion, showing a 45° helical fracture. (e) A closer view of broken edges and interlayer spiral transitions of nacreous specimens. (f) A detail look at inter- and transtablet breakage of nacreous tablets under pure shear stresses of torsion. The scale bars are 1 mm in (a), (b), (c), (d), 50 µm in (e), and 5 µm in (f).

Fractographic characterization proves interfacial fracture in nacre

We observed two flat surfaces over the entire 3 mm-diameter circular cross sections of nacreous specimens after failure (Fig. 3a,c). Under the white light, the flat surface exhibits a combination of green (λ≈510 nm) and yellow (λ≈570 nm) colors, which is different from the iridescence of the inner surface of red abalone shells. The reason is that uniform horizontal tablet (~500-nm thick) layers underneath reinforce lights with specific wavelengths over the entire fracture surface. Elevated tablet sections appear on the left (Fig. 3b and c). This is because pure shear stress condition is no longer maintained once cracks start to propagate after the failure of external tablets. As a result, cracks kink from one interface to another that eventually separate the specimen. Detail SEM image (Fig. 3e) shows that large areas of tablets are exposed and are interlaced with broken edges that transit spirally from one layer to the next20. The broken edges (Fig. 3f) include both the smooth intertablet delamination and brutal transtablet breakage. However, these sharp edges are different from the blunted edges of polished nacre specimens34, demonstrating that tablets and spiral connections are quickly removed during crack propagations. The microCT image (Fig. 3d) clearly shows the different brittle fracture of aragonite specimens. Aragonite specimens exhibit a classical 45-degree helical fracture perpendicular to the principal tensile stress, while nacreous specimens fracture sharply through the interfaces between aragonite tablets.

Mathematical modeling quantifies nanoscale toughening mechanisms

To detail the nanoscale toughening mechanisms in the initial sliding stage, we created isotropic linear elastic finite element models to quantify the contribution of nanopillars, nanoasperities and protein chains to the shear resistance. A contour of an exposed tablet (Fig. 4a) shows that stresses in nanopillars and nanoasperities (E = 100 GPa) are substantially higher than those of protein chains (E = 20 MPa) due to the significantly different elastic moduli. The lower and upper bounds of shear stress curves (Fig. 4b) correspond to nanopillar densities of 1.4 and 5.6/µm2, respectively. The mean shear strength (~41.5 MPa) curve corresponds to a density of ~2.2/µm2. By decoupling the contribution of each mechanism with respect to various tablet moduli (E = 80 to100 GPa) and pressures (p = −35 to 35 kPa), Fig. 4c shows that nanopillars contribute to more than 95% of the shear resistance, while nanoasperities and protein chains contribute limitedly in the initial sliding stage. High shear stresses in the middle section of nanopillars (~1.0 GPa) enable their breakage at the end of the initial sliding stage. Compared to the shear strength of aragonite mineral specimens (~14.5 MPa), nacreous nanopillars exhibit much higher shear resistance, demonstrating the ‘smaller-is-stronger’ size effect down to the nanoscale.

Figure 4
figure4

Mathematical modeling. (a) Mises stress contours of nanopillars, nanoasperities and organic matrices at the end of the initial sliding. (b) Predictions of the upper, lower and average shear stress lines in the torsional tests. (c) Contributions of nanopillars, nanoasperities and organic matrices to the shear resistance of nacre in the initial sliding stage. E1, E2 and E3 correspond to the elastic moduli of 100, 90 and 80 GPa, respectively. N, C and T denote zero, compressive (−35 kPa) and tensile (35 kPa) stresses on tablets, respectively. The scale bar is 500 nm in (a).

The Achilles heel of nacre

If we define the intact nanopillars, nanoasperities and protein chains before sliding as ‘mortar’, the ductile or brittle behavior of nacre is highly dependent on how bricks (tablets) perform after mortar sections fail. The mineral bridges, nanoasperities and protein chains are activated to resist sliding in the beginning. When mineral bridges break after tablets slide about twenty nanometers, vertical distances between tablets decrease (Fig. 5a and b). In most stress conditions, contact areas between tablets increase gradually and substantially as cracks propagate completely or partially parallel to the sliding direction (Fig. 5c). The toughening mechanisms then change to the nanoasperity contact and protein deformation in nanoscale, and to interactions of wavy tablets, tablet pulling-out and crack deflections in microscale1,27,28 (Fig. 5d). For example, when nacre is in tension along the tablets18,24,35, mortar sections fail first (the linear increment), and some tablets start to touch each other (the nonlinear increment). Then, microscale toughening mechanisms are triggered at various locations continuously (the extended stress plateau). Similar behavior exists in nacre under compression36,37, bending24, 45-degree shear24,26 or direct shear26,38. However, when nacre is under torsion normal to aragonite layers, the sliding of tablets (tangential) is perpendicular to the crack propagation (radial), and the large stress gradients enable the specimen to fail quickly (Fig. 1b). Thus, nacre exhibits completely interfacial brittle fracture since there is little chance for brick interactions after the mortar sections fail (Fig. 5e). The Achilles heel of nacre is to avoid triggering microscale toughening mechanisms that can induce the ductile behavior. The discretization nature of torsional loads enable us to study nano- and microscale material behavior using relatively large specimens. Torsion can be particularly advantageous to study interlayer/interfacial mechanical behavior of layered materials.

Figure 5
figure5

Schematics of the evolution of toughening mechanisms in the nacre deformation. (a) The beginning of tablet sliding. (b) Initial sliding up to the breakage of nanopillars. (c) Decrease in spacing induces more tablet contact. (d) Tablet geometries (waviness, pulling out, etc.) contribute to the shear resistance in the microscale toughening stage. Diagram (e) shows the direction of the crack propagation is perpendicular to tablet sliding under pure shear stresses of torsion, in which (c) and (d) are not fully triggered.

In summary, by applying pure shear stresses of torsion, we exhibit the linear response in the initial sliding stage of nacreous tablets. Mathematical modeling shows that nanopillars contribute dominantly to the shear resistance, while nanoasperity contact and protein chains contribute limitedly in this stage. Complete brittle fracture observed between tablet interfaces in torsion is convincing proof that microscale toughening mechanisms are not triggered to promote ductile behavior of nacreous structures. These findings open an exciting perspective into studying mechanical properties of natural and artificial layered materials using pure shear stresses of torsion. Future effort could also be extended to study the interactions between nanoparticles that build the nacreous tablets, such as rotations, orders, protein strengthening, and deformation twinning.

Materials and Methods

Sample preparation

A red abalone shell with a maximum length of ~210 mm (The Shell shop, CA, US) was obtained to prepare specimens for mechanical tests. The shell was first shaped to 7.6 mm by 7.6 mm cubes, and epoxy ends (Loctite Fixmaster, Rocky Hill, CT) were bonded to increase the gripping area. Using a modified minilathe G8688 (Grizzly Industrial Inc., WA, US) with the high precision control, dry composite dog-bone shaped specimens were created by tuning the cylindrical axis perpendicular to the tablet layers. The gauge sections had diameters of ~3.0 mm and lengths of ~3.0 mm. Then, sample surfaces were smoothed using 400 to 1200 grit sandpapers (3 M Company, Maplewood, Minnesota). A total of five specimens were created using pure nacreous gauge sections that are devoid of growth lines. A similar procedure was followed to create single-crystal aragonite specimens (Gold Nugget Miner online) with diameters of ~3.4 mm and gauge section lengths of ~3.4 mm.

Torsional tests

Monotonic torsional tests were performed to study the fracture of nacre specimens using an eXpert 8600 Series axial-torsion testing systems (ADMET, Norwood, MA). Displacement control was used to apply the torque at the rate of 90 degrees per minute with a pre-load of ~0.023 Nm, during which quasi-static loading was assumed. Fixtures with four-independent jaws were created to clamp the specimens. A constant tension of ~0.22 N was maintained during the torsional test. The resulting tensile stress was ~35 kPa, which was far below the tensile strength of nacreous tablets4. A dual-system was created to detail the torque-rotation curves using two load cells and two data acquisition systems. A small torsional load cell with a maximum torque of 2.82 Nm (Futek, Irvine, CA) was mounted on top of a big axial-torsion load cell (ADMET, Norwood, MA) with a maximum torque of 56.5 Nm and a maximum axial load of 4.45 kN. Signals from the big load cell were collected at 50 samples per second using the MtestQuatro’s system (Admet, Norwood, MA); while signals from the small load cell were collected via a 14-bit U2531A data acquisition unit (Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA) at 200,000 samples per second. Calibration of the dual system ranged from 0.0025 to 1.24 Nm. The resulting R2 value of the linear fitting is 1.0. The twisting angle of the gauge section was measured by subtracting twisting angles of the small load cell and the tapered sections between the clamp end and gauge section from the total rotation recorded. By applying the same series of torque ranging from 0 to 2.25 Nm, twisting angles in the elastic range of an aluminum sample with a 12.7 mm-diameter gauge section were measured using only the big load cell or the two load cells, respectively. The rotation differences were used to establish the torque-rotation relation of the small load cell. Finite element analysis was performed to obtain the torque-rotation relation of the tapered segments. The results show that the twisting angle of the gauge section is ~92% of the total rotation measured.

Fractographic characterization

Different microscopes were used to characterize fractural surfaces of nacre specimens, including optical, scanning electron and microCT techniques. The optical imaging was conducted using an Aven 26700-300 digital microscope (Aven, Ann Arbor, MI) with the built-in white LED light source. For scanning electron imaging, fractured samples were sputter-coated with gold/palladium film without polishing the surfaces. The coated samples were then examined using JEOL 6060 Scanning Electron Microscope (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA) at the beam voltage of ~20 kV. To compare nacre and aragonite specimens, microCT analysis was performed to scan aragonite samples with the resolution of 6.3 µm at 60 kV and 110 µA for ~6 hours using the Skycan 1173 Xray microtomographer (Microphotonic Inc., Allentown, PA).

Finite element simulation

Three-dimensional finite element models were created using the ABAQUS software (Simulia, Providence, RI) to simulate the initial sliding between two vertically adjacent tablets on the circumference of the gauge section. Different mechanisms, including mineral bridges, nanoasperities, and organic components, are activated simultaneously in the models. Aragonite tablets were modeled as hexagonal disks with edge lengths of 3 µm and the thickness of 500 nm. The vertical spacing in between was 30 nm. Organic matrices were modeled as cylinders with diameters of ~368 nm, and the total area of matrices occupied 5% of the hexagonal area. Similarly, nanopillars were modeled as cylinders with diameters of 50 nm between tablets. Asperities were modeled as half spheres with diameters of 50 nm and heights of 17.5 nm. Thus, the asperity-asperity inception height was 5 nm, and a normal frictionless contact was assumed for the asperity interaction. When nacre grows, nanopillars extrude between proteins to connect the top and bottom tablets32,33. Thus, the contact of nanoasperities was not prevalent before tablets slide. In the models, a maximum of 100 nanoasperities could be placed between two parallel hexagonal edges, 50% of which were assumed to contact their mates on the other tablet. Finite element results show that contact stress between asperities is ~14 GPa when the inception height is 5 nm, i.e., close to the theoretical strength of aragonite (E/10 to E/5, i.e., 10 to 20 GPa)39. If the inception height was greater than 5 nm, asperities were assumed to break and were treated as nanopillars. All materials were assumed isotropic, linear and elastic based on the stress-strain curves (Fig. 2a). The models were meshed using 2 to 4 million tetrahedral elements. The elastic modulus for organic matrices was 20 MPa40. The elastic moduli for aragonite tablets, nanopillars and nanoasperities were the same, ranging from 80 to 100 GPa41,42. The Poisson’s ratios were 0.4 for organic matrices43 and 0.3 for aragonite26. The bottom tablet was fixed, while the top tablet was constrained except for the sliding and pressure directions. Based on the habitat depths of red abalone44, i.e., 3.0–4.5 m and 7.0–10.0 m, residual stresses induced by hydrostatic conditions were assumed ranging from 0, −35 and −70 kPa. When these pressures were superimposed with the tensile stress in experiments (35 kPa), the total stresses applied on tablets were 35, 0 and −35 kPa.

References

  1. 1.

    Wegst, U. G., Bai, H., Saiz, E., Tomsia, A. P. & Ritchie, R. O. Bioinspired structural materials. Nat Mater 14, 23–36 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gao, H., Ji, B., Jäger, I. L., Arzt, E. & Fratzl, P. Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: lessons from nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 5597–5600 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Li, X., Xu, Z.-H. & Wang, R. In situ observation of nanograin rotation and deformation in nacre. Nano Lett 6, 2301–2304 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Meyers, M. A., Chen, P.-Y., Lin, A. Y.-M. & Seki, Y. Biological materials: structure and mechanical properties. Prog Mater Sci 53, 1–206 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ortiz, C. & Boyce, M. C. Bioinspired structural materials. Science 319, 1053–1054 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Soboyejo, W. Mechanical properties of engineered materials, (CRC press, (2002).

  7. 7.

    Barthelat, F., Yin, Z. & Buehler, M. J. Structure and mechanics of interfaces in biological materials. Nat Rev Mater 1, 16007 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhang, G. & Li, X. Uncovering Aragonite Nanoparticle Self-assembly in Nacre–A natural armor. Cryst. Growth Des. 12, 4306–4310 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Huang, Z. & Li, X. Origin of flaw-tolerance in nacre. Sci Rep 3(2013).

  10. 10.

    Xu, Z. H. & Li, X. Deformation strengthening of biopolymer in nacre. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 3883–3888 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu, J. et al. Atomistic origin of deformation twinning in biomineral aragonite. Phys Rev Lett 118, 105501 (2017).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Huang, Z. & Li, X. Order-disorder transition of aragonite nanoparticles in nacre. Phys Rev Lett 109, 025501 (2012).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wise, S.W. Microarchitecture and mode of formation of nacre (mother of pearl) in pelecypods, gastropods, and cephalopods, (Birkhäuser, 1970).

  14. 14.

    Jackson, A., Vincent, J. & Turner, R. The mechanical design of nacre. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 234, 415–440 (1988).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gu, G.X., Libonati, F., Wettermark, S. & Buehler, M.J. Printing nature: Unraveling the role of nacre’s mineral bridges. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.007 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Sarikaya, M., Gunnison, K., Yasrebi, M. & Aksay, I. Mechanical property-microstructural relationships in abalone shell. MRS Online Proc Library Arch 174 (1989).

  17. 17.

    Schäffer, T. E. et al. Does abalone nacre form by heteroepitaxial nucleation or by growth through mineral bridges? Chem Mater 9, 1731–1740 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shen, X., Belcher, A. M., Hansma, P. K., Stucky, G. D. & Morse, D. E. Molecular cloning and characterization of lustrin A, a matrix protein from shell and pearl nacre of Haliotis rufescens. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272, 32472–32481 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Checa, A. G., Cartwright, J. H. & Willinger, M.-G. Mineral bridges in nacre. J Struct Biol 176, 330–339 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yao, N., Epstein, A. K., Liu, W. W., Sauer, F. & Yang, N. Organic–inorganic interfaces and spiral growth in nacre. J R Soc Interface 6, 367–376 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Su, X. et al. Structural and microstructural characterization of the growth lines and prismatic microarchitecture in red abalone shell and the microstructures of abalone “flat pearls”. Chem Mater 14, 3106–3117 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Evans, A. et al. Model for the robust mechanical behavior of nacre. J Mater Res 16, 2475–2484 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Katti, D. R., Pradhan, S. M. & Katti, K. S. Modeling the organic-inorganic interfacial nanoasperities in a model bio-nanocomposite, nacre. Rev Adv Mater 6, 162–168 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wang, R., Suo, Z., Evans, A., Yao, N. & Aksay, I. Deformation mechanisms in nacre. J Mater Res 16, 2485–2493 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Smith, B. L. et al. Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites. Nature 399, 761–763 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Barthelat, F., Tang, H., Zavattieri, P., Li, C.-M. & Espinosa, H. On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: a key feature in the material hierarchical structure. J Mech Phys Solids 55, 306–337 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Espinosa, H. D. et al. Tablet-level origin of toughening in abalone shells and translation to synthetic composite materials. Nat Commun 2, 173 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shao, Y., Zhao, H.-P., Feng, X.-Q. & Gao, H. Discontinuous crack-bridging model for fracture toughness analysis of nacre. J Mech Phys Solids 60, 1400–1419 (2012).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tan, T. et al. Investigating fracture behavior of polymer and polymeric composite materials using spiral notch torsion test. Eng Fract Mech 101, 109–128 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang, J., Liu, K. & Joshi, G. Using torsion bar testing to determine fracture toughness of ceramic materials. in ASME 2002 Engineering Technology Conference on Energy 227–241 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2002).

  31. 31.

    Erasmus, J., Cook, P. & Sweijd, N. Internal shell structure and growth lines in the shell of the abalone, Haliotis midae. J Shellfish Res 13, 493–502 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lin, A. Y.-M., Chen, P.-Y. & Meyers, M. A. The growth of nacre in the abalone shell. Acta Biomater 4, 131–138 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Radmacherf, M., Waltersf, D. A., Hansmaf, P. K. & Stucky, G. D. Flat pearls from biofabrication of organized composites on inorganic substrates. Nature 371, 1 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hendry, J. P., Perkins, W. T. & Bane, T. Short-term environmental change in a Jurassic lagoon deduced from geochemical trends in aragonite bivalve shells. Geol Soc Am Bull 113, 790–798 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Currey, J. Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 196, 443–463 (1977).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Huang, Z. et al. Uncovering high-strain rate protection mechanism in nacre. Sci Rep 1, 148 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Menig, R., Meyers, M., Meyers, M. & Vecchio, K. Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical response of Haliotis rufescens (abalone) shells. Acta Mater 48, 2383–2398 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lin, A. Y.-M. & Meyers, M. A. Interfacial shear strength in abalone nacre. J Mech Behav Biomed 2, 607–612 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wachtman, J. B., Cannon, W. R. & Matthewson, M. J. Mechanical properties of ceramics, (John Wiley & Sons, 2009).

  40. 40.

    Okumura, K. & De Gennes, P.-G. Why is nacre strong? Elastic theory and fracture mechanics for biocomposites with stratified structures. Eur Phys J E 4, 121–127 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bruet, B. et al. Nanoscale morphology and indentation of individual nacre tablets from the gastropod mollusc Trochus niloticus. J Mater Res 20, 2400–2419 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Dashkovskiy, S., Suhr, B., Tushtev, K. & Grathwohl, G. Nacre properties in the elastic range: Influence of matrix incompressibility. Comp Mater Sci 41, 96–106 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Barthelat, F., Li, C.-M., Comi, C. & Espinosa, H. D. Mechanical properties of nacre constituents and their impact on mechanical performance. J Mater Res 21, 1977–1986 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Fanshawe, S., Vanblaricom, G. R. & Shelly, A. A. Restored top carnivores as detriments to the performance of marine protected areas intended for fishery sustainability: a case study with red abalones and sea otters. Conserv Biol 17, 273–283 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the funding support from Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission and Taif University. The authors acknowledge financial support from UVM clean energy fund (028613), Vermont Venture Innovation Fund (031365) and the National Science Foundation Grant through the Major Research Instrumentation Program (1429252). Appreciation is also extended to Michele von Turkovich at the UVM Microscopy Imaging Center for her assistance on material characterization.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.T. and S.A. conceived and designed the research. S.A., C.H., F.V. and T.T. prepared samples. S.A., T.T., T.X., J.Y. and D.H. created the experimental testing system. S.A., C.H. and T.T. performed the experiments and analyzed the results. S.A and T.T. conducted the mathematical modeling. S.A., T.T. and M.D. characterized the fracture surface. S.A. and T.T. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting Tan.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alghamdi, S., Tan, T., Hale-Sills, C. et al. Catastrophic failure of nacre under pure shear stresses of torsion. Sci Rep 7, 13123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13492-z

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing