Abstract
Several rareearth monopnictides were shown to exhibit extreme magnetoresistance and fieldinduced lowtemperature plateau of electrical resistivity. These features are also hallmarks of topological semimetals, thus the family is intensively explored with respect to magnetotransport properties and possible hosting Dirac fermion states. We report a comprehensive investigation of Fermi surface and electrical transport properties of LuSb, another representative of this family. At low temperatures, the magnetoresistance of LuSb was found to exceed 3000% without saturation in fields up to 9 T. Analysis of the Hall effect and the Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations revealed that the Fermi surface of this compound consists of several pockets originating from fairly compensated multiband electronic structure, in full accordance with our firstprinciples calculations. Observed magnetotransport properties of LuSb can be attributed to the topology of threedimensional Fermi surface and a compensation of electron and hole contributions.
Introduction
Rareearth monopnictides have been studied intensively in the last two years as materials with extreme magnetoresistance (XMR), having potential in application as magnetic field sensors, but also bearing some similarities to topologically nontrivial semimetals. For LaSb, XMR = 9 × 10^{5}% (at T = 2 K and B = 9 T) was reported^{1}, comparable to XMR in archetypal Weyl semimetals TaAs and NbP^{2,3}, and Dirac semimetal Cd_{3}As_{2} ^{4}. It has been suggested that XMR in this compound, alike in the bismuthide LaBi, emerges from nearly perfect carrier compensation and d−p mixed orbital texture of the Fermi surface (FS)^{5}. The same reasoning was extended in ref.^{5} to other materials demonstrating XMR: NbSb_{2}, PtSn_{4} and WTe_{2}. Similarly large XMR effect was reported also for antiferromagnets: NdSb and CeSb^{6,7}. Remarkably, cerium monopnictides were proposed recently as unique materials in which Dirac fermions coexist with strongly correlated electrons^{8}. For both LaSb and LaBi, the authors of ref.^{5} emphasized a correlation between the magnitude of XMR and the square of the residual resistivity ratio (RRR = ρ(300K)/(2K)). Similar correlation was shown for these monopnictides over two decades ago^{9}.
As far as topological character of the electronic structure in LaSb is concerned, there are distinctly controversial reports in the literature. The first angleresolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) study indicated trivial electronic structure and confirmed that unsaturated XMR is a consequence of nearly perfect compensation of charge carriers^{10}. Shortly thereafter, another ARPES experiment revealed exotic surface states^{11}, resembling those in LaBi, where nontrivial topology of the electronic structure was concluded from the results of electronic transport^{12,13} and ARPES measurements^{14,15,16}. Very recent comprehensive Kohler scaling analysis clearly indicated the bulk origin of XMR in LaSb^{17}.
Formation of lutetium monoantimonide was first reported more than halfcentury ago^{18}. In early studies, this compound was used only as a nonmagnetic reference or an initial matrix for doping with other rareearths^{19,20}. Later, some results of electronic transport, thermal expansion and microhardness measurements as well as melting point were reported^{21}. Following discovery of the firstorder structural phase transition at high pressures in rareearth monoantimonides, among them LuSb^{22}, stronger interest in this family of compounds was aroused, resulting in several theoretical analyses of electronic, elastic and structural properties^{23,24,25,26}.
This work on LuSb, is a followup of our recent investigation of the magnetotransport properties of YSb, which is a well compensated semimetal with XMR attaining 1.6×10^{4}% (at 2 K in magnetic field of 9 T)^{27,28,29}. To date, single values of resistivity, carrier concentration and mobility of LuSb were available in the literature^{21}, without specifying temperatures at which these quantities were obtained. In the very recent ARPES study no Diraclike features were found^{30}. In this paper we describe the magnetotransport properties and the Fermi surface of LuSb, and compare the experimental findings with the results of our electronic band structure calculations.
Results and Discussion
Electronic structure calculations
Figure 1 presents the electronic structure of LuSb calculated using LAPW method with the modified BeckeJohnson (mBJ) potential (details are described in Methods). Overall, it is very similar to those reported for other rareearth monopnictides^{5,12,13,27,31}, with four bands crossing the Fermi level: three hole bands in vicinity of Γpoint and one electron band close to the highsymmetry Xpoint of the Brillouin zone.
The d − p mixed orbital texture in LaSb and LaBi is due to the crossing of the lanthanum dband with the pnictogen pband and subsequent opening of a small gap at the point of crossing by the spinorbit interaction. This was suggested to be responsible for topological nature of these compounds^{5,31}. We reported very similar texture in YSb^{27}.
In LuSb, however, the dband of lanthanum and the pband of antimony do not cross between Γ and X points, but are well separated by a direct gap of at least 0.38 eV (cf Fig. 1). The gaps opened by the spinorbit coupling in lanthanum monopnictides^{5,31} and YSb^{27} were two or three orders of magnitude narrower than that in LuSb. These features exclude any significant d − p orbital mixing, which could give rise to topologically nontrivial electronic states in this compound.
The calculations showed that the FS of LuSb consists of four sheets (see Fig. 2). Three of them, centered at the Γpoint (labeled β, δ, ζ in Fig. 2(a)), are holelike, whereas a triplicate one, centered at the Xpoint (labeled α in Fig. 2(a)), is electronlike. The smallest ζ pocket is a sphere placed inside the almost spherical β pocket, which in turn, is nested in the biggest holepocket δ, resembling an octahedron.
FS resulting from our calculations differs slightly from those reported before, which did not show the smallest holelike pocket^{24,25}. The Fermi surfaces calculated for lanthanum monopnictides are also different, having two holelike Fermi sheets^{5,13}. However, the data derived for LuSb are almost identical to those of YSb^{27}. Comparing total volume of three hole pockets (0.06967 Å^{−3}) with that of the electron pocket (0.07065 Å^{−3}) leads to a conclusion that LuSb is fairly well compensated semimetal.
Electrical resistivity and magnetoresistance
As shown in Fig. 3, the electrical resistivity of singlecrystalline LuSb decreases with decreasing temperature in a metalliclike manner from ρ = 201.9 μΩ cm at T = 300 K down to ρ = 0.67μΩ cm at T = 2 K. The RRR of our sample is 30, slightly larger than 22, we reported for YSb^{27}, but about tenfold smaller than those of several other rareearth monopnictides^{1,11,12,13}. In the temperature interval from 0.7 K to 300 K, ρ(T) follows the BlochGrüneisen law:
with the residual resistivity ρ _{0} = 0.65 μΩ cm, Debye temperature \({{\rm{\Theta }}}_{D}=408\) K, factor A = 33.7 μΩ cm and exponent k = 2.19 (note red solid line in Fig. 3). The obtained value of k is similar to those observed for several La or Luintermetallics^{32}, and another lutetium monopnictide, LuAs, which has also a very similar \({{\rm{\Theta }}}_{D}=420\) K^{33}.
In magnetic fields applied perpendicular to the electric current, the electrical transport in LuSb has a completely different character than that in zero magnetic field (see the inset to Fig. 3). In B = 3 T, a shallow minimum in ρ(T) can be discerned at T _{ m } ≈ 34 K, and in stronger fields this feature becomes more pronounced and shifts to higher temperatures (T _{ m } ≈ 88 K in 9 T field). Below T _{ m }, the resistivity increases with decreasing T, and saturates below ≈10 K, forming a lowtemperature plateau. Such a behavior of ρ(T) was described as a characteristic feature of topological semimetals^{3}, or alternatively, attributed to band compensation effect occurring e.g. in WTe_{2} ^{34} or several rareearth monopnictides^{12,13,27}.
Universal T − B phase diagram was constructed for several materials showing XMR (LaSb, LaBi, NbSb_{2}, PtSn_{4} and WTe_{2})^{5,13}. It consisted of linearwithfield T _{ m } and fieldindependent T _{ i } (marking the inflection point of ρ(T)). The T _{ m } and T _{ i } temperatures discerned from the inset to Fig. 3 also form a similar phase diagram for LuSb.
The transverse magnetoresistance of LuSb, MR = \(100{\rm{ \% }}\times [\rho (B)\rho (B=0)]/\rho (B=0)\) (magnetic field applied perpendicular to electric current), measured at several temperatures in the range from 0.7 K up to 300 K, is displayed in Fig. 4. MR reaches 3025% at T = 0.7 K, and MR(B) does not saturate in a field of 9 T. Upon heating the sample up to 15 K, MR decreases very little, but between 15 and 50 K it drops drastically. The magnetoresistance of LuSb is one or two orders of magnitude smaller that MR reported for other rareearth monopnictides^{5,12,13,29}. This seems due to rather small RRR of our crystals, since it was shown that MR depends on RRR in a quadratic manner^{5,35}. In previous works, XMR of rareearth monopnictides was attributed to: almost perfect electronhole compensation^{12,13,29}, metalinsulator transition^{1} or d−p orbital mixing combined with carrier compensation^{5}. The last scenario was also proposed for some other materials with XMR effect, like WTe_{2}, NbSb_{2}, or PtSn_{4} ^{5}. We suggest that electronhole compensation leads to very large MR in LuSb.
The Kohler scaling, which is presented in Fig. 5, allows to draw conclusions about the very large MR effect. For LuSb, all the MR curves measured at different temperatures collapse onto a single curve that can be described by the Kohler equation MR\(=\alpha {(B/\rho (B=\mathrm{0))}}^{m}\) with the exponent m = 1.73 (note a red solid line in Fig. 5). The obtained value of m is nearly the same as that derived for YSb^{27} but somewhat smaller than m = 1.866 and m = 1.92 reported for LaBi^{13}, and WTe_{2} ^{34}, respectively. It is worth recalling that m = 2 is expected for a material with perfect carrier compensation.
In magnetic fields stronger than ~5 T, the transverse magnetoresistance of LuSb shows clear Shubnikov–de Haas (SdH) oscillations at temperatures up to 15 K (cf Fig. 4). The result of subtraction of a 2^{nd}orderpolynomial background from the resistivity data, Δρ, is plotted in Fig. 6(a) against inverse magnetic field for several temperatures from the range 2–15 K. Fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis (see Fig. 6(b)), performed on the Δρ(1/B) data, revealed that the observed oscillations contain four basic frequencies and two harmonics (the values of \({f}_{i}^{{\rm{FFT}}}\) are listed in Table 1). Multifrequency quantum oscillations clearly indicate complex Fermi surface structure of LuSb, in accord with the results of the electronic structure calculations presented above.
According to Onsager relation^{36}, oscillation frequencies are proportional to areas of extremal crosssections of Fermi surface pockets. Thus, one can compare the experimental values of \({f}_{i}^{{\rm{FFT}}}\) with those estimated from the firstprinciple calculations, and ascribe each of them to a Fermi pocket. In the FFT spectrum of LuSb two different frequencies, \({f}_{\alpha }^{{\rm{FFT}}}\) and \({f}_{{\alpha }_{1}}^{{\rm{FFT}}}\) correspond to two different extreme crosssections of the Fermi sheet α (marked as green loops in Fig. 2(a,b)). In turn, the frequencies \({f}_{\beta }^{{\rm{FFT}}}\) and \({f}_{\delta }^{{\rm{FFT}}}\) correspond to Fermi pockets β and δ, respectively (note blue and yellow loops in Fig. 2(b)). The frequency \({f}_{2\alpha }^{{\rm{FFT}}}\) is the second harmonic of \({f}_{\alpha }^{{\rm{FFT}}}\), while \({f}_{2\beta }^{{\rm{FFT}}}\) is the second harmonic of \({f}_{\beta }^{{\rm{FFT}}}\). We could not observe the contribution due to the smallest ζ Fermi sheet because the range of magnetic field in which we recorded oscillations was too narrow to detect such a small frequency as \({f}_{\zeta }\approx 50\) T predicted by calculations.
Making rough approximations that extreme crosssections of α, β and δ are circles, and extreme cut of α _{1} is an ellipse (see Fig. 2), we calculated the Fermi wavevectors, k _{ F,i }, gathered in Table 1. Subsequently, we calculated volumes, V _{ F,i }), and corresponding carrier concentrations, \({n}_{i}={V}_{F,i}/\mathrm{(4}{\pi }^{3})\), for each Fermi pocket. The soobtained values of n _{ i } are given in Table 1 (the value n _{ α } takes into account the triplicity of the α Fermi pocket).
In the inset to Fig. 6, the amplitudes of peaks corresponding to the α and β Fermi pockets are plotted as a function of temperature. From the leastsquare fitting with the equation describing thermal damping of SdH oscillation
with B = 9 T and the constant \(\lambda =2{\pi }^{2}{k}_{B}{m}_{0}/e\hslash \,(\approx 14.7\,{\rm{T}}/{\rm{K}})\), we obtained the effective masses: \({m}_{\alpha }^{\ast }=0.25\,{m}_{0}\) and \({m}_{\beta }^{\ast }=0.27\,{m}_{0}\). These values of m ^{*} are similar to those reported in the literature for other rareearth monopnictides^{6,12,13,27}.
In order to corroborate the FFT results, we evaluated the SdH oscillations in LuSb in terms of LifshitzKosevich (LK) theory^{36,37,38}. The multifrequency LK function:
was fitted to the experimental data taken at T = 2 K where, f _{ i } is the oscillation frequency, \({a}_{i}\sqrt{1/B}{\sinh }^{1}({b}_{i}/B)\) comprises the temperature reduction and the spin factors, \(\exp ({c}_{i}/B)\) stands for the Dingle factor and \({\phi }_{i}\) is the phase of oscillation. In order to avoid overparametrization all frequencies were fixed at FFTderived values (cf Table 1). The red fitting curve almost perfectly follows experimental \({\rm{\Delta }}\rho \mathrm{(1}/B)\) data, as shown in Fig. 7. This confirms that our FFT analysis revealed all significant contributions to SdH oscillations.
Hall effect
The results of Hall effect measurements of singlecrystalline LuSb are summarized in Fig. 8. The Hall resistivity isotherms shown in Fig. 8(a) were obtained after removing the ρ _{ xx } contribution by subtraction of the data recorded in magnetic fields of opposite directions. The magnitude of ρ _{ xy } is very small and does not exceed 0.6 μΩ cm for any field or temperature values accessible in the experiment. The ρ _{ xy }(B) dependences are curvilinear and nonmonotonous, which indicates that several bands are responsible for the transport properties of LuSb, in agreement with the results of the firstprinciple calculations and the SdH oscillations analysis presented above.
Accordingly, the Halleffect data of LuSb were evaluated within a multiband Drude model of electrical conductivity. First, ρ _{ xy } was converted into the \({\sigma }_{xy}\) component of conductivity tensor using the simple relation \({\sigma }_{xy}={\rho }_{xy}/({\rho }_{xx}^{2}+{\rho }_{xy}^{2})\). Next, the \({\sigma }_{xy}(B)\) data were fitted with the multiband Drude formula:
where e is an elementary charge, n _{ el } and μ _{ el }, n _{ i } and μ _{ i } (for \(i=h1,h2\)) stand for the carrier concentrations and the carrier mobilities of one electron and two holelike bands, respectively. Such three bands give main contributions to the conductivity of LuSb, as concluded from the analysis of the SdH oscillations.
Since the initial fit using free n _{ el }, μ _{ el }, n _{ i } and μ _{ i } parameters was overparameterized, in the next step we fixed \({n}_{h1}\) at the carrier concentration value obtained from the SdH oscillations for the β pocket (the almost isotropic one) \({n}_{h1}\equiv {n}_{\beta }=1.31\times {10}^{20}\) cm^{−3}. With this simplification, the experimental \({\sigma }_{xy}(B)\) data measured at T = 2 K were properly described with equation (4), as shown in Fig. 8(b) by a red solid line. The fit confirmed that two of three bands are holelike and the third one is electronlike, and yielded the following parameters: \({\mu }_{h1}=1.04\times {10}^{4}\) cm^{2}/(Vs), \({n}_{h2}=3.63\times {10}^{20}\) cm^{−3}, \({\mu }_{h2}=6.18\times {10}^{3}\) cm^{2}/(Vs), \({n}_{el}=4.93\times {10}^{20}\) cm^{−3} and \({\mu }_{el}=6.43\times {10}^{3}\) cm^{2}/(Vs). It is worth noting that this analysis gave the \({n}_{h2}\) concentration almost identical to \({n}_{\delta }\) and the \({n}_{el}\) value intermediate between \({n}_{\alpha }\) and \({n}_{\alpha }^{calc}\) obtained from the SdH oscillations and bandstructure calculations, respectively (cf Table 1). Small discrepancies may originate from the approximations of the α and \(\delta \) Fermi sheets in LuSb with an ellipsoid and a sphere, respectively. On the other hand, our bandstructure calculations were performed using lattice parameter obtained from Xray diffraction at room temperature, slightly larger than at T = 2 K (thermal expansion of LuSb was predicted to be similar to that of normal metals^{26}), which certainly influenced \({n}_{i}^{calc}\) values.
The sum of carrier concentrations of two holelike bands \({n}_{h1}+{n}_{h2}\approx 4.94\times {10}^{20}\) cm^{−3} is almost equal to the carrier concentration n _{ el } of the electronlike band. This indicates again that LuSb is close to perfect carrier compensation. In turn, the carrier mobilities in LuSb are comparable to those found for YSb^{27}, yet an order of magnitude smaller than those reported for LaBi^{12,13}. The moderate values of μ _{ i } imply that the magnetoresistance of LuSb is notably smaller than MR measured for other rareearth monopnictides^{35}.
Angledependent magnetotransport
Figure 9(a) illustrates changes in the fielddependent electrical resistivity of LuSb with varying the direction of applied magnetic field with respect to the direction of electric current. In a transverse configuration (field direction is perpendicular to current direction, which corresponds to θ = 0°), MR reaches its maximum magnitude, whereas in longitudinal configuration (field and current directions are parallel to each other, i.e. θ = 90°) MR attains its minimum values. It should be noted that the anisotropy of the magnetoresistance of LuSb (at T = 2 K and in B = 9 T) is giant and equals AMR \(\equiv \,100{\rm{ \% }}\times [\rho {(90}^{\circ })\rho {(0}^{\circ })]/\rho {(0}^{\circ })=87\,{\rm{ \% }}\). This value is slightly larger than that observed for YSb^{27}. In both compounds, AMR arises mainly due to carriers from the strongly anisotropic electronlike Fermi pockets.
In order to quantify the anisotropy of the Fermi surface in LuSb, the model developed in ref.^{39} was applied. First, the magnetic field was scaled by a θdependent factor \({\varepsilon }_{\theta }\), so as all the \(\rho (B=9\,T)\) datapoints from all the MR curves of Fig. 9(a) moved on the \(\rho (B,\theta ={0}^{\circ })\) curve. In result, all the \(\rho (B,\theta )\) curves collapsed onto a single \(\rho ({\varepsilon }_{\theta }B)\equiv \rho (B,\theta ={0}^{\circ })\) variation, as it is apparent from Fig. 9(b). The values \({\varepsilon }_{\theta }\) which were used in the MR data conversion are shown in the inset to Fig. 9(b). Interestingly, they can be almost perfectly approximated by the function
which represents a proportionality of \({\varepsilon }_{\theta }\) to the crosssection of ellipsoidal Fermi pocket with the parameter γ standing for the mass anisotropy^{40}. From the fit of equation (5) to the data of LuSb (red solid line in the inset to Fig. 9(b)), we got \(\gamma =4.55\). This value is larger than γ = 3.4 obtained for YSb in ref.^{27} and γ = 4 found for MoTe_{2} in ref.^{41}, but smaller than \(\gamma =4.762\) reported for WTe_{2} in ref.^{39}. The soobtained γ value slightly disagrees with \({k}_{{F}_{{\alpha }_{1}}}/{k}_{{F}_{\alpha }}\sim 3\), which also corresponds to the Fermi sheet anisotropy. The discrepancy may be due to a contribution from anisotropic features of the δ pocket, which was not taken into account in our analysis of the SdH effect.
In all the ρ(B) curves taken at different θ angles there were discernible SdH oscillations, which could be analyzed in the same way as it was described above. Figure 10(a) shows \({\rm{\Delta }}\rho \) as a function of inverted magnetic field, and Fig. 10(b) demonstrates their FFT evaluation. The angle dependences of the particular FFT frequencies are displayed in Fig. 10(c). The experimental data are compared on this figure with the results of the firstprinciples calculations. In order to get good agreement between the measured and calculated values of the SdH frequencies, the latter ones had to be multiplied by 0.855 (which does not influence the carrier compensation), such adjustment may be due to slightly enhanced lattice parameter (determined at room temperature) used in band structure calculations.
Conclusions
Our comprehensive investigation of the magnetotransport behavior in singlecrystalline LuSb revealed substantial MR effect, which is most likely a consequence of nearly perfect charge compensation in this material, as supported by the results of our firstprinciples electronic band structure calculations. The measured magnitude of MR slightly exceeded 3000%, but improving the sample quality would certainly allow to obtain significantly larger MR. The quality of our crystals permitted recording of clear Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations, which allowed for the determination of the Fermi surface topology in LuSb. The experimental SdH data were very well reproduced by our band structure calculations. Kohler scaling of magnetoresistance accounts very well for its temperature behavior, whereas the fieldangledependent magnetoresistance could be scaled with the effective mass anisotropy perfectly agreeing with electronic structure and quantum oscillations analysis. The magnetotransport properties of LuSb could thus be well accounted for without invoking any topologically nontrivial electronic features.
This conclusion is in concert with the lack of band inversion and mixed d − p orbital texture in LuSb as well as findings from the most recent ARPES experiments^{30}. Our results and previous reports on magnetotransport in lanthanum monopnictides show that studies of other rareearth monopnictides might be crucial to elucidating the role of Dirac states in extreme magnetoresistance.
Methods
Electronic structure calculations were performed with the allelectron general potential linearized augmented planewave (LAPW) method using the WIEN2k code^{42}. Spinorbit coupling was included as a second variational step, using scalarrelativistic eigenfunctions as the basis, after the initial calculation was converged to selfconsistency. The Monkhorst–Pack special kpoint scheme with 46 × 46 × 46 mesh was used in the first Brillouin zone sampling, and the cutoff parameter (\({R}_{mt}{K}_{max}\)) was set to 8. The modified Becke–Johnson potential^{43} was applied for improved estimates of the band gaps followed by regular selfconsistentfield calculation using the GGA–PBE scheme^{44} for the exchangecorrelation potential.
For the Fermi surface, the irreducible Brillouin zone was sampled by 20225 k points to ensure accurate determination of the Fermi level^{45}. SdH frequencies were calculated using the Supercell Kspace Extremal Area Finder tool^{46}.
Single crystals of LuSb were grown from Sn flux in temperature regime selected accordingly to the binary phase diagram LuSb^{47}. The crystals were oriented and their quality was verified by backscattering Laue method using a Proto LAUECOS system. Powdered crystals were examined by powder Xray diffraction (XRD) employing a PANanalytical X’pert Pro diffractometer with CuK α radiation. The NaCltype crystal structure was confirmed, with the cubic lattice parameter of 6.0577(1) Å, which is close to the literature value 6.0555 Å^{18}. No impurity phases were observed on the XRD pattern. In addition, phase purity of the crystals and their chemical composition was checked by energydispersive Xray spectroscopy on FEI scanning electron microscope equipped with an EDAX Genesis XM4 spectrometer.
Measurements of electrical resistivity, magnetoresistance and Hall resistivity were carried out in the temperature range from 0.7 to 300 K and in magnetic fields up to 9 T employing a Quantum Design PPMS9 platform. Electrical contacts were made of silver wires attached to the rectangularprismshaped samples with silver epoxy, and additionally strengthened by spot welding. Electrical current was always flowing along [100] crystallographic direction.
Data availability
The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
 1.
Tafti, F. F., Gibson, Q. D., Kushwaha, S. K., Haldolaarachchige, N. & Cava, R. J. Resistivity plateau and extreme magnetoresistance in LaSb. Nat. Phys. 12, 272 (2016).
 2.
Huang, X. et al. Observation of the chiralanomalyinduced negative magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031023 (2015).
 3.
Shekhar, C. et al. Extremely large magnetoresistance and ultrahigh mobility in the topological Weyl semimetal candidate NbP. Nat. Phys. 11, 645 (2015).
 4.
Liang, T. et al. Ultrahigh mobility and giant magnetoresistance in the Dirac semimetal Cd_{3}As_{2}. Nat. Mater. 14, 280 (2014).
 5.
Tafti, F. F. et al. Temperaturefield phase diagram of extreme magnetoresistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, E3475 (2016).
 6.
Wakeham, N., Bauer, E. D., Neupane, M. & Ronning, F. Large magnetoresistance in the antiferromagnetic semimetal NdSb. Phys. Rev. B 93, 205152 (2016).
 7.
Ye, L., Suzuki, T., Wicker, C. R. & Checkelsky, J. G. Extreme magnetoresistance in magnetic rare earth monopnictides. arXiv preprint no. 1704.04226 (2017).
 8.
Alidoust, N. et al. A new form of (unexpected) Dirac fermions in the stronglycorrelated cerium monopnictides. arXiv preprint no. 1604.08571 (2016).
 9.
Kasuya, T., Sera, M., Okayama, Y. & Haga, Y. Normal and anomalous Hall effect in CeSb and CeBi. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 65, 160 (1996).
 10.
Zeng, L.K. et al. Compensated semimetal LaSb with unsaturated magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 127204 (2016).
 11.
Niu, X. H. et al. Presence of exotic electronic surface states in LaBi and LaSb. Phys. Rev. B 94, 165163 (2016).
 12.
Kumar, N. et al. Observation of pseudotwodimensional electron transport in the rock salttype topological semimetal LaBi. Phys. Rev. B 93, 241106 (2016).
 13.
Sun, S., Wang, Q., Guo, P. J., Liu, K. & Lei, H. Large magnetoresistance in LaBi: Origin of fieldinduced resistivity upturn and plateau in compensated semimetals. New J. Phys. 18, 082002 (2016).
 14.
Wu, Y. et al. Asymmetric mass acquisition in LaBi: Topological semimetal candidate. Phys. Rev. B 94, 081108 (2016).
 15.
Nayak, J. et al. Multiple Dirac cones at the surface of the topological metal LaBi. Nat. Commun. 8, 13942 (2017).
 16.
Lou, R. et al. Evidence of topological insulator state in the semimetal LaBi. Phys. Rev. B 95, 115140 (2017).
 17.
Han, F. et al. Separation of electron and hole dynamics in the semimetal LaSb. Phys. Rev. B 96, 125112 (2017).
 18.
Przybylska, M., Reddoch, A. H. & Ritter, G. J. The preparation and structure of lutetium diboride, scandium dodecaboride and lutetium antimonide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 407 (1963).
 19.
Birgeneau, R. J., Bucher, E., Maita, J. P., Passell, L. & Turberfield, K. C. Crystal fields and the effectivepointcharge model in the rareearth pnictides. Phys. Rev. B 8, 5345 (1973).
 20.
Davidov, D., Bucher, E., Rupp, L. W., Longinotti, L. D. & Rettori, C. Crystalline field effects in intermetallic compounds. Phys. Rev. B 9, 2879 (1974).
 21.
Abdusalyamova, M. N., Shokirov, H. S. & Rakhmatov, O. I. Investigation of the rare earth monoantimonides. J. LessCommon Met. 166, 221 (1990).
 22.
Shirotani, I. et al. Pressureinduced phase transitions in lanthanide monoantimonides with a NaCltype structure. Phys. Rev. 64, 132101 (2001).
 23.
Singh, S., Singh, R. K. & Gour, A. Highpressure phase transition and stability of CeSb, LaSb, and LuSb with NaCltype structure. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 24, 3543 (2010).
 24.
Pagare, G., Chouhan, S. S., Soni, P., Sanyal, S. P. & Rajagopalan, M. First principles study of structural, electronic and elastic properties of lutetium monopnictides. Comput. Mater. Sci. 50, 538 (2010).
 25.
Gupta, D. C. & Bhat, I. H. Electronic, ductile, phase transition and mechanical properties of Lumonopnictides under high pressures. J. Mol. Model. 19, 5343 (2013).
 26.
Ameri, M. et al. Structural, elastic, thermodynamic and electronic properties of LuX (X = N, Bi and Sb) compounds: first principles calculations. Phase Transitions 89, 1236 (2016).
 27.
Pavlosiuk, O., Swatek, P. & Wiśniewski, P. Giant magnetoresistance, threedimensional Fermi surface and origin of resistivity plateau in YSb semimetal. Sci. Rep. 6, 38691 (2016).
 28.
He, J. et al. Distinct electronic structure for the extreme magnetoresistance in YSb. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 267201 (2016).
 29.
Ghimire, N. J., Botana, A. S., Phelan, D., Zheng, H. & Mitchell, J. F. Magnetotransport of single crystalline YSb. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28, 235601 (2016).
 30.
Wu, Y. et al. Electronic structure of RSb (R = Y, Ce, Gd, Dy, Ho, Tm, Lu) studied by angleresolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 96, 035134 (2017).
 31.
Zeng, M. et al. Topological semimetals and topological insulators in rare earth monopnictides. arXiv preprint no. 1504.03492 (2015).
 32.
Fournier, J. M. & Gratz, E. Transport properties of rare earth and actinide intermetallics. In Handb. Phys. Chem. Rare Earths, (eds. Gschneidner, K.A., Eyring, L., Lander, G.H. and Choppin, G.R.) vol. 17 ch. 115, 496 (Elsevier B.V., 1993).
 33.
ŻogaƗ, O., Wawryk, R., Matusiak, M. & Henkie, Z. Electron transport and magnetic properties of semimetallic LuAs. J. Alloys Compd. 587, 190–198 (2014).
 34.
Wang, Y. L. et al. Origin of the turnon temperature behavior in WTe_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 92, 180402 (2015).
 35.
Ali, M. N. et al. Correlation of crystal quality and extreme magnetoresistance of WTe_{2}. Europhys. Lett. 110, 67002 (2015).
 36.
Shoenberg, D. Magnetic oscillations in metals (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984).
 37.
Lifshitz, I. M. & Kosevich, L. M. On the theory of the Shubnikovde Haas effect. Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 67 (1958).
 38.
Seiler, D. G. The Shubnikovde Haas effect: A powerful tool for characterizing semiconductors. In High magnetic fields in semiconductor physics II, (ed. Landwehr, G.) 578 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989).
 39.
Thoutam, L. R. et al. Temperaturedependent threedimensional anisotropy of the magnetoresistance in WTe_{2}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 046602 (2015).
 40.
Blatter, G., Geshkenbein, V. B. & Larkin, A. I. From isotropic to anisotropic superconductors: A scaling approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 875 (1992).
 41.
Chen, F. C. et al. Extremely large magnetoresistance in the typeII Weyl semimetal MoTe_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 94, 235154 (2016).
 42.
Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G. K. H., Kvasnicka, D. & Luitz, J. WIEN2K, an augmented plane wave + local orbitals program for calculating crystal propert i es (Technische Universität Wien, 2001).
 43.
Tran, F. & Blaha, P. Accurate band gaps of semiconductors and insulators with a semilocal exchangecorrelation potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 226401 (2009).
 44.
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
 45.
Kokalj, A. Computer graphics and graphical user interfaces as tools in simulations of matter at the atomic scale. Comput. Mater. Sci. 28, 155 (2003).
 46.
Rourke, P. M. C. & Julian, S. Numerical extraction of de Haasvan Alphen frequencies from calculated band energies. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 324 (2012).
 47.
Wang, S. L., Gao, F., Gan, S. X., Wang, C. P. & Liu, X. J. Thermodynamic assessments of the BiLu and LuSb systems. Calphad 35, 421 (2011).
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by the National Science Centre of Poland, grant no. 2015/18/A/ST3/00057. The band structure calculations were carried out at the Wrocław Centre for Networking and Supercomputing, grant no. 359.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
O.P. and M.K. conducted all the experiments, O.P. and P.W. conceived the experiments and analyzed the results, P.S. carried out the electronic structure calculations and prepared Figs 1 and 2. O.P., P.W. and D.K. discussed the results and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pavlosiuk, O., Kleinert, M., Swatek, P. et al. Fermi surface topology and magnetotransport in semimetallic LuSb. Sci Rep 7, 12822 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598017127928
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Quantum spin Hall effect, thermoelectric performance, and optical properties of XBi (X = Sc, Y) monolayers
Physica E: Lowdimensional Systems and Nanostructures (2020)

Validity of Kohler's rule for the magnetoresistance in pristine and irradiated NbAs2
Solid State Communications (2020)

Magnetotransport and electronic structure of the antiferromagnetic semimetal YbAs
Physical Review B (2020)

Hybrid functional calculations of electronic structure and carrier densities in rareearth monopnictides
Physical Review B (2020)

Topological phase transitions and optical properties of AB (A = Sc, Y and B = Sb, Bi) compounds
Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.