Article | Open

Monitoring and manipulating cellular crosstalk during kidney fibrosis inside a 3D in vitro co-culture

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 14490 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12683-y
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

In pharmacological research the development of promising lead compounds requires a detailed understanding of the dynamics of disease progression. However, for many diseases, such as kidney fibrosis, gaining such understanding requires complex real-time, multi-dimensional analysis of diseased and healthy tissue. To allow for such studies with increased throughput we established a dextran hydrogel-based in vitro 3D co-culture as a disease model for kidney fibrosis aimed at the discovery of compounds modulating the epithelial/mesenchymal crosstalk. This platform mimics a simplified pathological renal microenvironment at the interface between tubular epithelial cells and surrounding quiescent fibroblasts. We combined this 3D technology with epithelial reporter cell lines expressing fluorescent biomarkers in order to visualize pathophysiological cell state changes resulting from toxin-mediated chemical injury. Epithelial cell damage onset was robustly detected by image-based monitoring, and injured epithelial spheroids induced myofibroblast differentiation of co-cultured quiescent human fibroblasts. The presented 3D co-culture system therefore provides a unique model system for screening of novel therapeutic molecules capable to interfere and modulate the dialogue between epithelial and mesenchymal cells.

Introduction

The discovery of pharmaceutical lead compounds able to treat human disease effectively requires a thorough understanding of its molecular and genetic basis. Such molecular information is essential to identify therapeutic targets that can be used to source the drug discovery process1,2. To this end, access to clinical samples can advance the pathological, molecular, and prognostic characterization of an illness. However, accessibility to human samples is limited - and in many cases biased - by the very specific stage of the disease at which such tissues are typically collected for diagnostic analyses3.

Animal models have been proposed as an alternative or as a complementation to human tissue samples, yet they are often limited in their ability to effectively mimic human disorders4,5. Notably, only a handful of successful insights generated by those in vivo models have in fact been translated into the clinical scenario6,7 and later into clinical practice8,9. To better recapitulate key pathological events, emphasis can instead be placed on human cell-derived in vitro culture systems. Conventional two-dimensional (2D) cultures can exhibit differentiated cell functions, yet they commonly fail to mimic tissue- and organ-level structures and functions that are central to disease etiology10,11. Thus, there is an immediate need for alternative experimental systems that can recapitulate the tissue- and organ-level pathophysiology in vitro.

Like traditional 2D-cell culture, three-dimensional (3D) in vitro cell culture technology shares the advantages of being accessible to microscopic examination, chemical intervention, and biological manipulation. They have the added benefit of closer resembling physiological tissue organization and are therefore a powerful tool to investigate fundamental questions regarding morphogenesis, physiology, and disease dynamics12,13,14,15,16.

Kidney nephrons, exhibiting a complex physiological structure, have posed challenges for traditional in vitro cell culture experimentation17. The immense clinical relevance of human kidney fibrosis has recently led to the development of different in vitro human microtissue models to simulate the kidney nephron18,19 and to target such models for drug-induced toxicity20,21.

Damaged polar epithelial cells of the kidney proximal tubular epithelial compartment typically characterize kidney fibrosis. Their degradation is accompanied by an increase in activated myofibroblasts in the interstitial space, which in turn results in continuous accumulation of extracellular matrix and the progressive decline of renal function. In the past years, several lines of evidence have consistently highlighted the role of epithelial cells in controlling the myofibroblast phenotype22,23,24,25,26, with some studies demonstrating a major role of tubular injury in the etiology of fibrosis. This experimental indication is supported by extensive clinical evidence that severity of acute kidney injury, mainly consisting of an epithelial cell injury, predicts progression to chronic kidney disease, characterized by active myofibroblast proliferation27,28. Despite the availability of several in vitro human microtissue models, developed essentially to investigate drug-induced renal toxicity20,21, none of those models has allowed direct monitoring of epithelial to mesenchymal crosstalk.

Here, we report a novel 3D in vitro cell co-culture model closely resembling the in vivo human kidney microenvironment. Using live cell imaging we show the essential role of tubular cells in inducing the phenotypic transformation of the co-cultured fibroblasts into myofibroblasts. In our model, clinically relevant nephrotoxic drugs were used to induce a diseased epithelial phenotype, which in turn triggered transformation of co-cultured fibroblasts, a relevant pathophysiological phenomenon observed in vivo29,30 and in patients31. Finally, we show that healthy renal fibroblast appearance is successfully rescued by drug inhibition of known fibrosis pathways. The presented 3D co-culture therefore provides a unique model system for screening of new molecules capable to interfere and modulate the dialogue between epithelial and mesenchymal cells.

Results

Developing an in vitro 3D human renal microenvironment

We set out to create a platform that would conveniently allow simultaneous monitoring of epithelial cell injury and induction of the fibroblast to myofibroblast transition in co-cultured fibroblasts ultimately enabling imaging-based drug screens (Fig. 1a and b). To this end, we developed a stepwise in vitro 3D co-culture system made up of two layers of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-crosslinked dextran hydrogels, encompassing the different constituent cell phenotypes: The bottom layer contains polarized human kidney tubular cell (HKC-8) spheroids whereas the top layer holds quiescent primary human renal fibroblasts (Fig. 1a). Upon sparse seeding in dextran hydrogel the HKC-8 cells gathered to form cell aggregates. After 6 to 9 days, lumen formation in the spheroid core commenced and by day 12, the majority of structures contained a central hollow lumen surrounded by a uniform layer of columnar epithelium (Fig. 2a). On day 15, the hydrogel was overlaid with a second one containing MMP-sensitive peptide crosslinker to facilitate fibroblasts spreading and migration (Fig. 1a). This stepwise approach allowed for differential fine-tuning of the two separate microenvironments, ensuring optimal cell differentiation for both cell phenotypes. This solution was adopted as the tubular cells in the bottom compartment require a hydrogel that prevents cell spreading to maintain differentiated function, whereas the fibroblasts in the top layer require cellular cues for cell spreading and migration to develop their characteristic phenotype.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Building up an in vitro 3D human renal microenvironment. (a) Schematic stepwise illustration of the proposed in vitro 3D co-culture system composed of human kidney proximal tubular cells (HKC-8) and human renal fibroblasts: HKC-8 cells self-organize into spheroids within 12 days post seeding. Subsequently overlaid fibroblasts spread throughout the upper gel. Bottom panel: bright field images (left panel) and F-actin immunostaining (right panel; red, F-actin; blue, DAPI) of the two different cell types seeded in hydrogel. Bottom layer: HKC-8 spheroids; upper layer: spreading fibroblast. (b) Workflow of the proposed in vitro 3D co-culture system. Scale bar, 100 μm (a).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Human kidney proximal tubular (HKC-8) cells form 3D spheroids with distinct epithelial polarity. (a) Bright field images of single cell suspension HKC-8 cells seeded in dextran hydrogel forming HKC-8 spheroids after 12 days. (b) Functional characterization of HKC-8 spheroids: left panel: Immunofluorescent stainings. right panel: ultrastructural view of the HKC-8 spheroids using transmission electron microscopy (TEM): spheroids display a lumen (left upper panel), presence of microvilli (right upper panel), and tight junction between adjacent cells (lower panel) (*, X, and # indicate hollow lumen structure, cell-cell tight junction, and microvilli, respectively). Bottom HKC-8 spheroid passive molecular uptake study with fluorescently-labeled dextran low molecular weight (3 kDa, upper panel) and high molecular weight (150 kDa, lower panel). Scale bars, 50 μm (a), 10 μm (b, left), 2 µm (b, right), and 50 μm (b, bottom).

HKC-8 spheroids recapitulate essential architectural characteristics relevant to the human renal tubular compartment

In order to test the quality of our established 3D cell culture system, we assessed mature HKC-8 spheroids for polarity, ultrastructure, and permeability. At 15 days post-seeding, HKC-8 spheroids recapitulated essential architectural characteristics relevant to the human renal tubular compartment, such as polarized localization of β-catenin to adherent junctions and to basolateral membranes as well as presence of polarized ciliated cell surfaces (Fig. 2b). As expected for functional renal tubules, the spheroids expressed several renal transporters, such as aquaporin water channel 1 (AQP1), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), and sodium-independent chloride/iodide transporter (Pendrin), all being enriched at the cell surface (Fig. 2b left hand side of the figure). Ultrastructural analysis of the spheroids performed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) corroborated features detected via immunofluorescent staining: tight junctions were present between neighboring columnar renal epithelial cells, which enclosed a hollow lumen and possessed outward extending primary cilia (Fig. 2b on the right). Consistent with our structural analysis, tubular cell spheroids exhibited tissue-specific tight barriers, necessary for water reabsorption (Fig. 2b on the bottom)32. When FITC-conjugated dextran with molecular weight (MW) below the reported MW cutoff of proximal tubules (3 kDa) was added to the culture medium, it gradually filled the spheroid lumen within 4 hours of incubation time. Higher molecular weight FITC-conjugated dextran (150 kDa) on the other hand was excluded from the lumen and remained restricted to apical intercellular regions, indicating that the spheroids exhibit physiological renal reabsorption capabilities. These data suggest that HKC-8 spheroids can be generated in soft dextran hydrogel, retaining all main features of differentiated tubular epithelial cells.

The nephrotoxic compounds aristolochic acid and cyclosporine A can induce significant HKC-8 spheroids injury

To evaluate whether our in vitro confined microenvironment system can recapitulate the crosstalk reported between tubular epithelium and fibroblasts in the kidney in vivo33, we exposed our tubular epithelial HKC-8 spheroids to clinically-relevant nephrotoxic drugs, such as cyclosporine A (CycloA)34, gentamicin35, diclofenac36, aristolochic acid (AA)37, and lithium chloride38 (Supplementary Figure S1). To characterize the epithelial cell injury with high temporal resolution, spheroids made of stably transfected fluorescent biosensors were adopted. Genetically-encoded fluorescent cell cycle (CycleTrak) and cell polarity (E-cadherin-GFP) reporters were used to characterize early sign of epithelial cell damage (Fig. 3a) as previously described39,40,41. Acquired volumetric spheroid images were subjected to a phenotypic profiling based on intensity, localization, and ratio of the reporter signals (see Materials and Methods, Fig. 3b, and Supplementary Figure S2). In parallel to the imaging effort, transcriptome analysis of a gene panel relevant to epithelial cell injury was performed (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Table T1).

Figure 3
Figure 3

3D HKC-8 spheroids response to nephrotoxic compounds. (a) Schematic diagram of the HKC-8 spheroid response to nephrotoxins, (b) Quantitative image analysis of HKC-8 spheroids disease response by monitoring different reporter constructs (left, HKC-8 E-cadherin GFP; right, HKC-8 CycleTrak, n ≥ 4) (c) Kidney molecular tox gene panels consisting of ~1600 relevant genes analysis of the HKC-8 spheroids response to nephrotoxins (*P < 0.1, **P < 0.01; n.s., not significant (Mann Whitney U test). AA and cyclosporine A concentrations are 125 μM and 1.5 μM, respectively. For each group, spheroids were pooled from ~45,000 seeded cells. Scale bar, 30 μm (b).

We identified two nephrotoxic compounds, AA and CycloA, which induced a significant epithelial cell injury: epithelial cell polarity (i.e., E-cadherin GFP signal) decreased as early as 12 hours after both AA and CycloA administration (Fig. 3b). CycloA induced also an arrest of the spheroid epithelial cells in the G2/M phase 24 hours after toxic insult (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Figure S2). Overall, a mild reduction in spheroid viability was only noticeable 24 hours after CycloA administration (Supplementary Figure S3), indicating that the observed phenotypical changes at 12 and 24 hours originated from mostly unaffected cells. Notably, effects on cell polarity and cell cycle were more pronounced for CycloA than for AA.

Transcriptome analysis of nephrotoxin-treated spheroids showed upregulation of inflammatory genes (e.g., ISG15, IL11, IFNA1, IFITM1 and CCL5), angiogenesis-related genes (e.g., VEGFA and VEGFB), and transcripts coding for proteins known to increase epithelial cell ability to endure a hostile environment (e.g., GDF15) – and did so as early as 8 hours after drug administration (Fig. 3c). A pathway network analysis further revealed upregulation of genes associated with transmembrane transport of small molecules, transport of inorganic molecules, ABC-family proteins mediated transport, cellular responses to stress, interleukin-mediated signaling events, transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) receptor signaling, and lipid/lipoprotein metabolism (Supplementary Table T1). Analogous to the results obtained from optical imaging, CycloA treatment resulted in stronger gene signature modulation compared to AA treatment.

Nephrotoxin-treated HKC-8 spheroids induce myofibroblast differentiation in the in vitro 3D co-culture system

We then aimed to investigate whether injured spheroids would modulate the phenotype of co-cultured fibroblasts. After 24 hours nephrotoxin treatment, epithelial spheroids were washed and overlaid with proliferating and migrating renal fibroblasts dispersed in a hydrogel matrix (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Figure S4), there by mimicking a simplified pathological microenvironmental interface between human kidney proximal tubular epithelial cells and renal fibroblast. Fibroblasts co-cultured with AA or CycloA insulted spheroids underwent dramatic morphological changes as early as 24 hours after seeding, acquiring expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA+) (Fig. 4b). This transition was comparable to control fibroblasts that were monocultured in the same hydrogel matrix and treated with the pro-fibrogenic cytokine TGFβ142 (Supplementary Figure S5). Fibroblasts co-cultured with undamaged HKC-8 spheroids maintained their quiescent phenotype. CycloA-treated HKC-8 spheroids induced stronger myofibroblast differentiation compared to AA-treated ones, which is in agreement with the stronger epithelial cell injury observed in the epithelial spheroid assay (Fig. 3).

Figure 4
Figure 4

Image-based myofibroblast activation monitoring in the 3D co-culture setup. (a) Schematic diagram of the simulation of myofibroblast activation in the 3D in vitro co-culture setup through epithelial and mesenchymal crosstalk. (b) Activated myofibroblasts identification upon nephrotoxin treatment using αSMA immunofluorescent staining (n ≥ 3). (c) Myofibroblast signature genes validation with Taqman gene expression analysis (n = 4), *P < 0.1, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (two-tailed t test). AA and cyclosporine A concentrations are 125 μM and 1.5 μM, respectively. Scale bar, 5 μm (b).

Taqman gene expression assays of extracted co-cultured fibroblasts confirmed the stronger effect of CycloA in inducing myofibroblast activation. Both characteristic myofibroblast genes ACTA2 and CTGF, showed stronger upregulation in fibroblasts co-cultured on CycloA-treated HKC-8 spheroids than on AA treated ones (Fig. 4c). In both cases, we also detected upregulation of pro-fibrotic factors TGFβ1 and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) - two key chemokines in modulating the tubulointerstitial microenvironment in vivo (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Figure S6)29.

Pirfenidone treatment inhibits myofibroblast differentiation in the in vitro 3D co-culture system

The successful development of this comprehensive fibrosis model motivated us to test its capabilities in screening for anti-fibrogenic small molecule compounds. As a proof of concept, pirfenidone was selected based on its clinical relevance43,44 and its documented ability to inhibit TGFβ1-induced fibrogenesis45,46. Notably, as little as 24 hours pirfenidone treatment of the co-culture resulted in significantly decreased myofibroblast activation as shown by reduced amount of αSMA in fibroblasts (Fig. 4b). Likewise, the pronounced gene upregulation observed in the epithelial spheroids after CycloA treatment was counteracted by administration of pirfenidone (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Figure S6).

Discussion

In the present work, we describe, characterize, and validate a novel in vitro 3D cell co-culture system aimed at high throughput screening for compounds capable of modulating the tubulo-interstitial microenvironment crosstalk. The sequential buildup of the 3D in vitro microenvironment enables both proper physiological cell differentiation and at the same time targeted pharmacological manipulation of epithelial cells before the introduction of fibroblasts. Although the key elements of the deteriorated renal microenvironment (i.e. the injured tubular epithelial cells and resident fibroblasts) are represented in the proposed in vitro co-cultured cellular system, the generated screening environment lacks several elements of the native environment, such as a native cellular matrix as well as a native basement membrane at the base of the spheroids. These structures place highly relevant constraints on the signaling that can occur between tubule and fibroblast cells47. The corollary of this limitation is that the crosstalk generated in the present in vitro culture system may not comprehensively reflect the pathophysiological process that takes place in vivo. Unfortunately, the use of native matrix, tried in the setup phase of the present study, introduced an unacceptable level of irreproducibility, a feature incompatible with a high throughput assay meant to identify first-in-class drugs. In spite of these limitations, the proposed co-cultured system allows exploring a totally new chemical space: compounds that can modulate fibrosis by impacting directly on the epithelial/mesenchymal cellular crosstalk rather than the mere fibroblast to myofibroblast transition48 or the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT)49, thus capturing recently discovered biology29,30,31 in a single high throughput cellular assay.

In order to assess the pathological state of the epithelial spheroids, we combined 3D cell culture with fluorescent epithelial reporters, enabling time-lapse optical imaging of the early stages of epithelial cell injury exposed to nephrotoxic compounds12,29,50 followed by customized image-based analysis. Our phenotypic screening approach unveiled the precise temporal progression of cellular dynamics during early stage of epithelial damage that has previously been reported mainly in vivo40. Gene expression profiling at relevant stages of disease progression unveiled additional genetic diversity and more refined insight into the origin and properties of relevant fibrotic responses. Moreover, we identified the optimal time window for introducing primary fibroblasts and for generating an effective pathological microenvironmental interface.

Using this refined disease model, we demonstrate that fully differentiated polarized tubular cell spheroids, when injured, induce activation of surrounding quiescent fibroblasts into myofibroblasts via modulation of a complex cellular crosstalk, the hallmark cellular phenotype characteristic of the fibrotic kidney51,52. Notably, our results further corroborate previous in vivo experiments30,40 showing that fibrosis can occur in the absence of a direct EMT process, since no sign of epithelial cell transformation (e.g. activation of S100A4 protein) was detected in injured epithelium (data not shown). The observed marked effect of CycloA in modulating the myofibroblast phenotype is well in line with results from calcineurin inhibitor treated patients who display a diseased pro-fibrotic epithelial phenotype31, characterized by the cytoplasmic accumulation of the E-Cadherin transcriptional repressor protein SNAI153.

By inhibiting the TGFβ1 signaling pathway with a known fibrotic drug, we were able to interrupt fibrosis onset and rescue phenotypically healthy co-cultures, corroborating recent in vivo work that unveiled a key role of this chemokine in inducing diffuse fibrosis in the surrounding tubulo-interstitial space when locally overexpressed in renal tubules22.

Our results suggest that the present platform is well suited for imaging-based pharmacological drug screening of novel anti-fibrotic molecules that are capable of modulating the epithelial/mesenchymal crosstalk and whose relevance might apply well beyond the kidney to any other fibrotic disease such as pulmonary fibrosis54. The platform we describe here may also be used to assess potential side effects of antisense oligonucleotides, an emerging targeting modality characterized by a pronounced renal targeting and consequent renal toxicity55. To enable larger scale screenings by further increasing the throughput, parallelization of imaging and utilization of fast volumetric imaging modalities such as selective plane illumination microscopy (SPIM)56,57 can easily be implemented.

In order to allow for more refined patient-specific drug screens, the technology could likely be adapted to human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived epithelial cell lines. Although the use of hiPSCs can provide refined insight into the genetically determined variability in drug susceptibility within a given population, hiPSC derived cells are usually harder to transfect with reporter transgenes and were therefore not considered for the present work. Advances in transgenesis of hiPSCs will make this approach even more relevant, eliminating the need for stable cell lines. Ultimately, combining the highly versatile imaging-based platform that we present here with novel biomarkers and fast volumetric imaging opens up the possibility to perform high throughput, high content screening of pharmacological compounds in a miniaturized 3D human fibrosis model.

Methods

Materials

Cellendes 3D Life Dextran hydrogel kit was purchased from Biocat Germany. Other chemical reagents were obtained from Sigma Aldrich, otherwise mentioned. The human kidney proximal tubular cell line (HKC-8) was obtained from University Hospital of Erlangen-Nuremberg Germany, and the human renal fibroblasts (PU009-F) were obtained from DV Biologics USA and maintained with the medium kit provided by the company. Some of the schematic drawings were in part prepared using a Toolkit-Suite from Motifolio Inc., USA.

3D co-culture setup

Human proximal tubular cells HKC8 (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, ML, USA) were cultured in DMEM/F12 media supplemented with 2.5% FBS, 1% Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium (ITS, BD 354352), Penicillin (100 Units/ml) and Streptomycin (100 µg/ml) at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

Prior to mixing with the single cell suspension, the dextran hydrogel kit was functionalized with RGD peptide following the kit protocol. The HKC-8 single cell suspension was mixed with the RGD-functionalized dextran hydrogel, crosslinked with PEG-based crosslinker provided in the kit and spotted as small droplets in the cell culture well plate. Notably, the overlaid co-cultured cells in the hydrogel are still amenable for imaging with an upright confocal microscope and/or a long-distance objective lens in inverted confocal microscope.

HKC-8 spheroids characterization

To stain differentiation markers in HKC-8 spheroids such as β-Catenin, Pendrin, acetylated α-Tubulin, Glut1, and Aquaporin-1, HKC-8 spheroids in hydrogel were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes. The spheroids were then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 minutes, blocked with 1% BSA for 30 minutes, incubated with primary antibodies (Sigma Aldrich, Germany) and secondary antibodies (Life Technologies, Switzerland). The samples were then mounted with Fluorsave (Merck Chemicals, Germany) to minimize laser-induced photo bleaching. Microscopy images were acquired using a 40x water immersed objective lens (NA 1.2) on a Zeiss 710 upright and on a Zeiss 780 inverted confocal microscope, respectively. The 3D image stack was reconstructed using Imaris Software (Bitplane).

The molecular passive diffusion kinetics into the lumen of the spheroids were evaluated using fluorescent dextran compounds of two different molecular weights - one above the glomerular filtration molecular weight cutoff and another below (3 and 150 kDa, Life Technologies Switzerland), respective. To assess the compactness of cell-cell boundaries at the outermost layer of the HKC-8 spheroid, spheroids were imaged for 6 hours directly following the addition of the distinct dextran solutions.

Ultrastructural views of the spheroids were observed with a transmission electron microscope (TEM). HKC-8 spheroids in hydrogel were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hour, and further treated with 1% OsO4 for 2 hours at room temperature. The spheroids were subsequently dehydrated step-wise in ethanol (25%, 50%, 75%, 95% and 100%) for 10 minutes followed by 100% acetone twice for 20 minutes each. Upon dehydration, spheroids were then treated with 1:1 ratio mixture of acetone and araldite resin for 30 minutes at room temperature followed by overnight treatment at a 1:6 ratio at room temperature. On the following day, the samples were placed into araldite resin for 30 minutes at room temperature before transferring into a 40 °C oven for another 30 minutes. Araldite resin was subsequently changed followed by 1 hour treatments at 45 °C and 1 hour at 50 °C. Lastly, the samples were embedded with araldite resin at 60 °C for 24 hours. Sections of 90–100 μm thickness were sliced using a Leica EM UC 6 Ultramicrotome, collected onto 200-mesh copper grids and co-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate for 10 minutes each. Observation was undertaken with a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) (JEOL JEM-1010, Japan) at voltage 100 kV.

Cell reporter line establishment and analysis

HKC-8 cells were transfected with E-cadherin GFP (Addgene) and or CycleTrak (Dr. Kulesa Laboraroty Stowers Institute for Medical Research Kansas City USA) plasmids through nucleofection (Lonza 4D-NucleofectorTM System). Upon transfection, the cells were then expanded, sorted with FACS (Beckman Coulter MoFlo XDP), and maintained in the antibiotic resistance-containing medium.

HKC-8 E-cadherin GFP and HKC-8 CycleTrak clones were cultured in dextran hydrogel in an identical fashion to their parent clonal cell and followed the same ~12 day maturation time scale as non-transfected cells. On day 15 post-seeding, the spheroids were incubated with two nephrotoxins, aristolochic acid and cyclosporine A at concentrations 125 μM and 1.5 μM, respectively. These spheroids were imaged using confocal microscopy every 12 hours. The images were analyzed using a custom MATLAB (Mathworks) script, which i) automatically detects the outline of the spheroids based on ubiquitous nuclei staining and fluorescent reporter signal, ii) segments the hollow rim with consistent thickness across samples, and iii) quantifies reporter fluorescence on the segmented area.

Ampliseq

HKC-8 spheroids were treated with the selected nephrotoxins at concentrations 125 μM for aristolochic acid, 1.5 μM for cyclosporine A. These spheroids were lysed with RLT buffer at 8 and 24 hours upon treatment. The RNA was extracted with (RNA Isolation Kit Qiagen) and run in AmpliSeq gene array with ~1600 genes relevant with molecular toxicology (Thermofisher Scientific). For each probe on the chip, average expression levels were obtained, and the derived changes plus their statistical significance were calculated. Reads were aligned to the human transcriptome (hg19) and mapped to the 997 pathway reporters using the TMAP algorithm. Normalization and detection of differentially expressed genes in between the samples was done using the TMM algorithm and the exact test within the edgeR bioconductor package. Pathway reporters were considered statistically significant with a FDR < 0.05 and expression levels > 5 counts per million.

Fold changes between the control sample and the corresponding treatment condition were calculated and a heat map was created. Using the complete, ranked list of calculated changes, Gene Set Enrichment Analyses (GSEA) was run on gene sets provided by REACTOME and other sources through the Pathway Commons collection (www.pathwaycommons.org)58. For each such set, a significance level (technically, an FDR-corrected q-value) was calculated to indicate the joint up- or down-regulation of its member genes. The collection contains around 1,600 gene sets, which are partially overlapping and redundant. The readouts are then normalized to the readouts of control samples.

Myofibroblast immunofluorescent staining

Myofibroblasts appearance in the overlaid human renal fibroblast population was characterized by immunofluorescent staining of α smooth muscle actin (αSMA). The proliferation of the human renal fibroblasts was observed by performing a PicoGreen Assay (Life Technologies, USA). The overlaid fibroblasts in hydrogel were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 minutes, blocked with 1% BSA for 30 minutes, incubated with primary antibodies (Sigma Aldrich, Germany) and secondary antibodies (Life Technologies, Switzerland). The samples were then mounted with Fluorsave (Merck Chemicals, Germany) to minimize laser-induced photo bleaching. Microscopy images were acquired with 40x objective lens on a Zeiss Meta 710 upright confocal microscope. The maximum intensity projection images were then quantified and analyzed against the untreated sample. Pirfenidone as the chosen drug model to inhibit myofibroblasts proliferation was added after the fibroblasts were activated for at least a day.

Gene expression array analysis (Fluidigm)

Human renal fibroblast upper layers were gently separated from the bottom hydrogel, washed once with PBS and lysed with 350 µl RLT buffer. RNA was extracted from cells using an RNeasy 96 Kit (Qiagen, 74181) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (RNeasy 96 protocol for Isolation of total RNA from animal cells, using spin technology). cDNA was synthesized with Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit from Roche (04 897 030 001). RNA was mixed with oligo(dT)18 Primer 2.5 µM and random hexamer primer 60 µM, and denatured by heating to 65 °C for 10 minutes. Afterwards, 1x reaction buffer (8 mM MgCl2), 20U RNase Inhibitor, 1 mM dNTP and 10U Transcriptor reverse transcriptase were added and the synthesis reaction was performed for 10 minutes at 25 °C, followed by 50 °C for 60 minutes and stopped by heating at 85 °C for 5 minutes.

QPCR reactions were performed in 48-well Fluidigm chip for relative cDNA quantification for genes of interest using LC480 Probes Master (Roche Applied Science) and specific TaqMan Probes and Primers (Applied Biosystems), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Analysis was conducted using the Δ-Δcycle threshold (Ct) method, which determined fold changes in gene expression relative to a control-treated sample. Each analysis reaction was performed in duplicate, with 3 samples per condition. Gene expression was normalized to nonsense mediated mRNA decay factor (HBMS) and ubiquitin C (UBC), which were used as internal reference genes and was measured with the LightCycler 480 Instrument (Roche Applied Science).

Catalogue numbers for primers and probes: Alpha smooth muscle actin 2; ACTA2; Hs00426835_g1. Collagen, type I, alpha 1; Col1A1, Hs00164004_m1. Collagen, type III, alpha 1; Col3A1, Hs00943809_m1. Connective tissue growth factor; CTGF; Hs00170014_m1. Nonsense mediated mRNA decay factor; HBMS; Hs01089943_m1. Inhibitor of DNA binding 1; ID1; Hs03676575_s1. Transforming growth factor, beta 1; TGFβ1; Hs00998133_m1. Ubiquitin c; UBC; Hs01871556_s1.

Code availability

The custom Matlab script is available upon request.

Data availability

The detailed datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Mehta, S. et al. Predictive and prognostic molecular markers for cancer medicine. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2, 125–148, https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834009360519 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Preston, M., Fergusson, D. A. & Breau, R. H. Appraisal and use of a prognostic study from the urological literature. Indian J Urol 27, 508–512, https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.91443 (2011).

  3. 3.

    Abner, E. L. et al. “End-stage” neurofibrillary tangle pathology in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: fact or fiction? J Alzheimers Dis 25, 445–453, https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2011-101980 (2011).

  4. 4.

    Shanks, N., Greek, R. & Greek, J. Are animal models predictive for humans? Philos Ethics Humanit Med 4, 2, https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-4-2 (2009).

  5. 5.

    van der Worp, H. B. et al. Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS Med 7, e1000245, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000245 (2010).

  6. 6.

    Mak, I. W., Evaniew, N. & Ghert, M. Lost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment. Am J Transl Res 6, 114–118, http://www.ajtr.org/files/ajtr1312010(2014).

  7. 7.

    Cook, N., Jodrell, D. I. & Tuveson, D. A. Predictive in vivo animal models and translation to clinical trials. Drug Discov Today 17, 253–260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2012.02.003 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Rogawski, M. A. Brivaracetam: a rational drug discovery success story. British journal of pharmacology 154, 1555–1557, https://doi.org/10.1038/bjp.2008.221 (2008).

  9. 9.

    Kaminski, R. M. et al. SV2A protein is a broad-spectrum anticonvulsant target: functional correlation between protein binding and seizure protection in models of both partial and generalized epilepsy. Neuropharmacology 54, 715–720, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.11.021 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Pampaloni, F., Reynaud, E. G. & Stelzer, E. H. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8, 839–845, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2236 (2007).

  11. 11.

    Breslin, S. & O’Driscoll, L. The relevance of using 3D cell cultures, in addition to 2D monolayer cultures, when evaluating breast cancer drug sensitivity and resistance. Oncotarget 7, 45745–45756, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9935 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Benam, K. H. et al. Engineered in vitro disease models. Annu Rev Pathol 10, 195–262, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040418 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Ananthanarayanan, A. et al. Scalable spheroid model of human hepatocytes for hepatitis C infection and replication. Mol Pharm 11, 2106–2114, https://doi.org/10.1021/mp500063y (2014).

  14. 14.

    Edmondson, R., Broglie, J. J., Adcock, A. F. & Yang, L. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol 12, 207–218, https://doi.org/10.1089/adt.2014.573 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Fatehullah, A., Tan, S. H. & Barker, N. Organoids as an in vitro model of human development and disease. Nat Cell Biol 18, 246–254, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3312 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Choi, S. H. et al. A three-dimensional human neural cell culture model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 515, 274–278, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13800 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Benjamin, A., Nogueira da Costa, A., Delaunois, A., Rosseels, M. L. & Valentin, J. P. Renal Safety Pharmacology in Drug Discovery and Development. Handb Exp Pharmacol 229, 323–352, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46943-9_13 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Morizane, R. et al. Nephron organoids derived from human pluripotent stem cells model kidney development and injury. Nat Biotechnol 33, 1193–1200, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3392 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Freedman, B. S. et al. Modelling kidney disease with CRISPR-mutant kidney organoids derived from human pluripotent epiblast spheroids. Nat Commun 6, 8715, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9715 (2015).

  20. 20.

    Pazhayattil, G. S. & Shirali, A. C. Drug-induced impairment of renal function. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 7, 457–468, https://doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S39747 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Kim, S. Y. & Moon, A. Drug-induced nephrotoxicity and its biomarkers. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 20, 268–272, https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2012.20.3.268 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Koesters, R. et al. Tubular overexpression of transforming growth factor-beta1 induces autophagy and fibrosis but not mesenchymal transition of renal epithelial cells. The American journal of pathology 177, 632–643, https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.091012 (2010).

  23. 23.

    Picard, N., Baum, O., Vogetseder, A., Kaissling, B. & Le Hir, M. Origin of renal myofibroblasts in the model of unilateral ureter obstruction in the rat. Histochemistry and cell biology 130, 141–155, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-008-0433-8 (2008).

  24. 24.

    Chai, Q., Krag, S., Chai, S., Ledet, T. & Wogensen, L. Localisation and phenotypical characterisation of collagen-producing cells in TGF-beta 1-induced renal interstitial fibrosis. Histochemistry and cell biology 119, 267–280, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-003-0513-8 (2003).

  25. 25.

    Lin, S. L., Kisseleva, T., Brenner, D. A. & Duffield, J. S. Pericytes and perivascular fibroblasts are the primary source of collagen-producing cells in obstructive fibrosis of the kidney. Am J Pathol 173, 1617–1627, https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2008.080433 (2008).

  26. 26.

    Humphreys, B. D. et al. Fate tracing reveals the pericyte and not epithelial origin of myofibroblasts in kidney fibrosis. The American journal of pathology 176, 85–97, https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.090517 (2010).

  27. 27.

    Yaseen, A. et al. Acute kidney injury in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome of childhood is a major risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease. Renal failure 39, 323–327, https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2016.1277743 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Chawla, L. S., Amdur, R. L., Amodeo, S., Kimmel, P. L. & Palant, C. E. The severity of acute kidney injury predicts progression to chronic kidney disease. Kidney international 79, 1361–1369, https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.42 (2011).

  29. 29.

    Moll, S. et al. Epithelial cells as active player in fibrosis: findings from an in vitro model. PloS one 8, e56575, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056575 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Grgic, I. et al. Targeted proximal tubule injury triggers interstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis. Kidney international 82, 172–183, https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2012.20 (2012).

  31. 31.

    Prunotto, M. et al. Tubular Cytoplasmic Expression of Zinc Finger Protein SNAI1 in Renal Transplant Biopsies: A Sign of Diseased Epithelial Phenotype? Am J Pathol 187, 55–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.09.017 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Ruggiero, A. et al. Paradoxical glomerular filtration of carbon nanotubes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 12369–12374, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913667107 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Prunotto, M. et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal crosstalk alteration in kidney fibrosis. J Pathol 228, 131–147, https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4049 (2012).

  34. 34.

    Malvezzi, P. & Rostaing, L. The safety of calcineurin inhibitors for kidney-transplant patients. Expert Opin Drug Saf 14, 1531–1546, https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2015.1083974 (2015).

  35. 35.

    McWilliam, S. J., Antoine, D. J., Smyth, R. L. & Pirmohamed, M. Aminoglycoside-induced nephrotoxicity in children. Pediatr Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3533-z (2016).

  36. 36.

    Miller, L. G. & Prichard, J. G. Current issues in NSAID therapy. Prim Care 17, 589–601 (1990).

  37. 37.

    Nortier, J., Pozdzik, A., Roumeguere, T. & Vanherweghem, J. L. Aristolochic acid nephropathy (“Chinese herb nephropathy”). Nephrol Ther 11, 574–588, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2015.10.001 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Lucas, K. C., Hart, D. A. & Becker, R. W. Porcine proximal tubular cells (LLC-PK1) are able to tolerate high levels of lithium chloride in vitro: assessment of the influence of 1–20 mM LiCl on cell death and alterations in cell biology and biochemistry. Cell Biol Int 34, 225–233, https://doi.org/10.1042/CBI20090042 (2010).

  39. 39.

    Ridenour, D. A., McKinney, M. C., Bailey, C. M. & Kulesa, P. M. CycleTrak: a novel system for the semi-automated analysis of cell cycle dynamics. Dev Biol 365, 189–195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.02.026 (2012).

  40. 40.

    Yang, L., Besschetnova, T. Y., Brooks, C. R., Shah, J. V. & Bonventre, J. V. Epithelial cell cycle arrest in G2/M mediates kidney fibrosis after injury. Nature medicine 16, 535–543, 531p following 143, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2144 (2010).

  41. 41.

    Cho, I. J. et al. E-cadherin antagonizes transforming growth factor β1 gene induction in hepatic stellate cells by inhibiting RhoA-dependent Smad3 phosphorylation. Hepatology 52, 2053–2064, https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23931 (2010).

  42. 42.

    Desmouliere, A., Geinoz, A., Gabbiani, F. & Gabbiani, G. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 induces alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts. The Journal of cell biology 122, 103–111 (1993).

  43. 43.

    Meyer, K. C. & Decker, C. A. Role of pirfenidone in the management of pulmonary fibrosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 13, 427–437, https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S81141 (2017).

  44. 44.

    Cho, M. E., Smith, D. C., Branton, M. H., Penzak, S. R. & Kopp, J. B. Pirfenidone slows renal function decline in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology: CJASN 2, 906–913, https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.01050207 (2007).

  45. 45.

    Choi, K. et al. Pirfenidone inhibits transforming growth factor-β1-induced fibrogenesis by blocking nuclear translocation of Smads in human retinal pigment epithelial cell line ARPE-19. Mol Vis 18, 1010–1020 (2012).

  46. 46.

    Conte, E. et al. Effect of pirfenidone on proliferation, TGF-beta-induced myofibroblast differentiation and fibrogenic activity of primary human lung fibroblasts. Eur J Pharm Sci 58, 13–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2014.02.014 (2014).

  47. 47.

    Venkatachalam, M. A. & Weinberg, J. M. Fibrosis without fibroblast TGF-beta receptors? Kidney international 88, 434–437 (2015).

  48. 48.

    Chen, C. Z. & Raghunath, M. Focus on collagen: in vitro systems to study fibrogenesis and antifibrosis state of the art. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 2, 7, https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-1536-2-7 (2009).

  49. 49.

    Liu, N. et al. A High Content Screening Assay to Identify Compounds with Anti-Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Effects from the Chinese Herbal Medicine Tong-Mai-Yang-Xin-Wan. Molecules 21, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101340 (2016).

  50. 50.

    Racusen, L. C. et al. Cell lines with extended in vitro growth potential from human renal proximal tubule: characterization, response to inducers, and comparison with established cell lines. J Lab Clin Med 129, 318–329, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2143(97)90180-3 (1997).

  51. 51.

    Schnaper, H. W. The Tubulointerstitial Pathophysiology of Progressive Kidney Disease. Advances in chronic kidney disease 24, 107–116, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2016.11.011 (2017).

  52. 52.

    Vega, G., Alarcon, S. & San Martin, R. The cellular and signalling alterations conducted by TGF-beta contributing to renal fibrosis. Cytokine 88, 115–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2016.08.019 (2016).

  53. 53.

    Kanarek, N. et al. Spermatogenesis rescue in a mouse deficient for the ubiquitin ligase SCF{beta}-TrCP by single substrate depletion. Genes Dev 24, 470–477, https://doi.org/24/5/470[pii]10.1101/gad.551610 (2010)

  54. 54.

    Chapman, H. A. Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in pulmonary fibrosis. Annual review of physiology 73, 413–435, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142225 (2011).

  55. 55.

    Engelhardt, J. A. Comparative Renal Toxicopathology of Antisense Oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acid Ther 26, 199–209, https://doi.org/10.1089/nat.2015.0598 (2016).

  56. 56.

    Strnad, P. et al. Inverted light-sheet microscope for imaging mouse pre-implantation development. Nat Methods 13, 139–142, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3690 (2016).

  57. 57.

    Swoger, J., Pampaloni, F. & Stelzer, E. H. Imaging MDCK cysts with a single (selective) plane illumination microscope. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2014, 114–118, https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot080184 (2014).

  58. 58.

    Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 15545–15550, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102 (2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the support and input provided by the Pantazis lab –in particular M. Haffner and L. Georgieva - as well as by the Single Cell Facility (SCF) at the Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering (D-BSSE), especially V. Jäggin. We also thank A. Araujo Del Rosario, T. Lopes, P. Henchoz, E. Kueng, D.Z. Jitao, L. Badi, S. Kobel, M. Aria, A. Moisan, J.V. Bonventre, and W.P. Dempsey for critical comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF grant no. 31003A_ 144048) and the European Union Seventh Framework Program (Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (CIG) no. 334552) to P.P. B.N. was supported by the Roche Postdoc Fellowship (RPF) Program (RPF-ID277). P.P. wishes to acknowledge the generous support from F.Hoffmann-La Roche in acquiring the Zeiss microscope used in this study.

Author information

Author notes

    • Bramasta Nugraha

    Present address: Institute for Regenerative Medicine (IREM), Wyss Translational Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Wagistrasse 12, 8952, Schlieren, Switzerland

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering (D-BSSE), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058, Basel, Switzerland

    • Bramasta Nugraha
    • , Manuel A. Mohr
    • , Aaron Ponti
    •  & Periklis Pantazis
  2. Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070, Basel, Switzerland

    • Bramasta Nugraha
    • , Franziska Weibel
    • , Ulrich Certa
    •  & Marco Prunotto
  3. Institute for Regenerative Medicine (IREM), University of Zurich, Wagistrasse 12, 8952, Schlieren, Switzerland

    • Maximilian Y. Emmert
    •  & Simon P. Hoerstrup
  4. Department of Surgical Research, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland

    • Bramasta Nugraha
    • , Maximilian Y. Emmert
    •  & Simon P. Hoerstrup
  5. University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland

    • Maximilian Y. Emmert
    •  & Simon P. Hoerstrup
  6. Wyss Translational Center Zurich, Moussonstrasse 13, 8044, Zurich, Switzerland

    • Maximilian Y. Emmert
    •  & Simon P. Hoerstrup
  7. Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    • Solange Moll

Authors

  1. Search for Bramasta Nugraha in:

  2. Search for Manuel A. Mohr in:

  3. Search for Aaron Ponti in:

  4. Search for Maximilian Y. Emmert in:

  5. Search for Franziska Weibel in:

  6. Search for Simon P. Hoerstrup in:

  7. Search for Solange Moll in:

  8. Search for Ulrich Certa in:

  9. Search for Marco Prunotto in:

  10. Search for Periklis Pantazis in:

Contributions

Conceptualization S.M., U.C., M.P., P.P. Methodology B.N., M.A.M., M.P., P.P. Software M.A.M., A.P. Formal Analysis M.A.M. Investigation B.N., F.W., M.A.M. Writing – Original Draft Preparation B.N., M.A.M., M.P., P.P. Writing – Review & Editing M.Y.E., S.P.H. Visualization B.N., M.A.M., P.P. Supervision M.P., P.P. Project Administration M.P., P.P. Funding Acquisition B.N., M.P., P.P.

Competing Interests

F.W., U.C., and M.P. were/are employees of F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Part of the work has been funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. All the other authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marco Prunotto or Periklis Pantazis.

Electronic supplementary material

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.