# Terahertz spectroscopy of anisotropic materials using beams with rotatable polarization

## Abstract

We introduce a polarization-resolved terahertz time-domain spectrometer with a broadband (0.3–2.5 THz), rotatable THz polarization state, and which exhibits minimal change in the electric field amplitude and polarization state upon rotation. This was achieved by rotating an interdigitated photoconductive emitter, and by detecting the orthogonal components of the generated THz pulse via electro-optic sampling. The high precision (<0.1°) and accuracy (<1.0°) of this approach is beneficial for the study of anisotropic materials without rotating the sample, which can be impractical, for instance for samples held in a cryostat. The versatility of this method was demonstrated by studying the anisotropic THz optical properties of uniaxial and biaxial oxide crystals. For uniaxial ZnO and LaAlO3, which have minimal THz absorption across the measurement bandwidth, the orientations of the eigenmodes of propagation were conveniently identified as the orientation angles that produced a transmitted THz pulse with zero ellipticity, and the birefringence was quantified. In CuO, a multiferroic with improper ferroelectricity, the anisotropic THz absorption created by an electromagnon was investigated, mapping its selection rule precisely. For this biaxial crystal, which has phonon and electromagnon absorption, the polarization eigenvectors exhibited chromatic dispersion, as a result of the monoclinic crystal structure and the frequency-dependent complex refractive index.

## Introduction

Recent advances in the generation and detection of terahertz (THz) radiation have enabled a wide range of intriguing material properties in the far-infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum to be investigated. In particular, terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) has matured into a powerful tool for characterizing the optical properties of materials at THz frequencies1,2,3. Many materials demonstrate anisotropic behavior at THz frequencies, such as birefringence created by anisotropy in the vibrational or electronic response4,5, and electro- and magneto-optical effects6,7,8. Designs of optical components for polarization control in the THz region, such as wire-grid polarizers (WGPs)9 and wave plates10, depend critically on the optical anisotropy. Therefore the accurate determination of the optical properties of anisotropic materials is important for both optical component design and fundamental physical research11.

The optical properties of a non-magnetic anisotropic crystal can be described by the dielectric tensor, ε, as the electric displacement D = ε ε 0 E is no longer necessarily parallel to the THz electric field E. For light with angular frequency ω propagating in an anisotropic crystal with an arbitrary wavevector k there are two orthogonal normal modes, with polarization eigenvectors u 1,2. These normal modes each have different refractive indices. If the incident light is linearly polarized with components of E along u 1 and u 2, the transmitted light will in general be elliptically polarized, i.e. the medium acts as a wave plate. The polarization state of an electromagnetic wave is characterized by its ellipticity angle χ(ω), where χ = 0 for linear polarization and χ = ±45° for circular polarization, and its orientation angle ψ(ω)11.

One method by which the optical properties of anisotropic media can be studied is to rotate the sample4,12, changing the directions of u 1,2 relative to E. While simple to perform at room temperature, at cryogenic temperatures or in high external magnetic fields rotating the sample is challenging. Also, if the sample is not perfectly aligned with the axis of rotation, different numbers of grains or domains in the sample may be probed at different angles. This is an important consideration in inhomogeneous materials such as lanthanum aluminate (LaAlO3), where the transmitted THz polarization state depends strongly on the size and number of domains probed5.

Alternatively to rotating the sample, the THz polarization state may be rotated by: changing the orientation angle of the generated beam during the emission process; rotating it using a half-waveplate; projecting it using a WGP. The latter two methods are used in spectroscopic ellipsometry, with WGPs favored for THz ellipsometry13. Ideally, a polarization rotation system should satisfy the following criteria: a minimal insertion loss for any components used, minimal change in E with rotation angle in terms of the amplitude |E| and polarization state (ψ and χ), precise and accurate determination of ψ and χ, and uniform operation over a wide bandwidth. Half-waveplates made of a single birefrigent material5 and metasurface-based polarization rotators14 are intrinsically narrowband and have finite loss, and are thus not ideal for broadband THz spectroscopy with arbitrarily rotatable THz pulses. Recently however, efforts have been made to produce metamaterial-based devices that operate over a broader frequency range15,16,17. Internal reflection within a prism offers broadband polarization rotation: for instance a half-waveplate with retardance close to π and varying by ±6° with frequency was reported18. These components are large and require collimated THz beams. A rotation of the generated THz beam has been shown for plasma-based THz emission19, which is reliant upon high pulse energy laser amplifiers with lower repetition rates. In terms of the more widely-used THz-TDS systems based on laser oscillators, photoconductive emitters are the THz source of choice for spectroscopy and imaging applications in custom-made and commercial systems. The coarse rotation (to 0°, 45° and 90°) of a wide-area photoconductive emitter has been reported, to alternate between vertical and horizontal THz emission20, with an accuracy in the orientation angle of 5°, a large ellipticity, and a variation in |E| by 40% on rotating the emitter by 90°. This summary of polarization-rotation methods is by no means exhaustive, however no scheme meets all the above criteria.

Here we introduce the method of rotatable polarization terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (RP-THz-TDS), which provides a convenient and powerful probe of the behavior of anisotropic materials at THz frequencies, based on rotating an interdigitated photoconductive emitter. We obtained E x and E y directly via electro-optic sampling, resolving the full THz polarization state (ψ, χ), without requiring the extra components, assumptions and data analysis required by ellipsometric methods. We show that this approach allows broadband polarization rotation, with linearly polarized THz pulses that can be rotated to arbitrary angles (accuracy <1.0°, precision <0.1°), and exhibiting a small ellipticity (accuracy <0.75°, precision <0.1°), across a frequency range of 0.3–2.5 THz. The method does not rely upon THz waveplates, and is therefore broadband, and does not require wire-grid polarizers, circumventing the problem of their poor extinction ratio. We demonstrate the applicability of this technique by investigating: (i) the finite ellipticity created by a wire-grid polarizer; (ii) the anisotropic behavior of two uniaxial materials, zinc oxide (ZnO)21 and lanthanum aluminate (LaAlO3)5; and (iii) anisotropy in the refractive index and absorption for the biaxial compound cupric oxide (CuO)7,22. Rotating the THz polarization state not only allows convenient access to the anisotropic optical properties at cryogenic temperatures or in high magnetic fields, but also ensures that the same area on the sample is probed at each angle, solving both of these issues related to rotating the sample.

## Results

### Rotatable polarization THz-TDS

Figure 1(a) shows our scheme for THz-TDS with a rotatable, linear THz polarization state, which exploited an interdigitated photoconductive emitter mounted in a motorized rotation stage. Details of the emitter are given in the Methods section. Photoexcited carriers were accelerated perpendicular to the gold strips (as shown by the red arrows), defining the linear polarization state of the THz pulse. The orientation angle was then varied by rotating the rotation stage (black arrow).

On rotating the emitter it was apparent that its centre was close to, but not exactly on, the axis of the rotation stage. Thus under rotation the emitter was no longer centered on the THz generation beam, altering the radiated THz power. To overcome this problem we mounted the rotation stage on a motorized xy-stage and mapped the resistance of the device, under illumination, at different emitter angles ψ em from ψ em = 0° to ψ em = 180° (limited by the emitter’s wiring). Such a map at ψ em = 0° is shown in Fig. 1(b) together with the center of the device obtained with a ‘centre of mass’ calculation (white dot). The co-ordinates of the emitter’s center are shown in Fig. 1(c) for all values of ψ em: the emitter was off-centered from the stage’s rotation axis by about 0.3 mm. This calibration step allowed us to re-centre the emitter at each ψ em. A larger emitter area or more precise mounting on the rotation stage’s axis could avoid this x − y calibration step.

Polarization-resolved THz detection has been reported using photoconductive antennae with three and four contacts20,23,24, or by rotating a (110)-oriented electro-optic crystal25 or the polarization of the detection beam26 in electro-optic sampling. Here, the polarization state of the emitted THz radiation was evaluated by measuring its orthogonal components with the method proposed by van der Valk et al.26. In this variant of electro-optic sampling the gate beam propagates through a quarter-wave plate (QWP), a [111]-oriented ZnTe, a half-wave plate (HWP) and a Wollaston prism (WP)26. By considering the THz electric field’s components along the $$\mathrm{[0}\overline{1}\mathrm{1]}$$ and $$[\overline{2}\mathrm{11]}$$ axes of the [111]-ZnTe as $${E}_{0\overline{1}1}$$ and $${E}_{\overline{2}11}$$, respectively, the electro-optic signal ΔI can be written26:

$${\rm{\Delta }}I\propto [{E}_{\overline{2}11}\,\sin \,\mathrm{(2}\theta -4\delta )+{E}_{0\overline{1}1}\,\cos \,\mathrm{(2}\theta -4\delta )],$$
(1)

where θ is the angle between the WP and $$\mathrm{[0}\overline{1}\mathrm{1]}$$, and δ is the angle between the HWP and the WP.

To align the detection system we first found the HWP angle that minimized the vertical component of the gate beam after the WP, thus defining δ = 0. We then set the emitter at ψ em = 0° in order to obtain vertically polarized THz radiation (i.e. along the y-axis), and rotated the ZnTe about its surface normal to find the maximum electro-optic signal, where θ = 0. Under these conditions, the electro-optic signal is $${\rm{\Delta }}I\propto {E}_{0\overline{1}1}$$, and corresponds to the y component of the THz electric field, E y . The x component, E x , was then obtained by setting δ = 22.5° (see Eq. (1)) by precisely rotating the HWP, mounted in a motorized rotation stage.

The polarization state of an electromagnetic wave can be characterized by its ellipticity angle χ(ω), where χ = 0 for linear polarization and χ = ±45° for circular polarization11, and its orientation angle ψ(ω), which is the angle with respect to the x-axis, as defined by the [$$\bar{2}11$$]-axis of the ZnTe in our setup. We obtained χ and ψ by converting the complex THz spectra $${\tilde{E}}_{x}(\omega )$$ and $${\tilde{E}}_{y}(\omega )$$ into a circular basis using $${\tilde{E}}_{\pm }=|{\tilde{E}}_{\pm }|{e}^{i{\phi }_{\pm }}=({\tilde{E}}_{x}+i{\tilde{E}}_{y})/\sqrt{2}$$, and by then using $$\tan \,\chi =(|{\tilde{E}}_{-}|-|{\tilde{E}}_{+}|)/(|{\tilde{E}}_{+}|+|{\tilde{E}}_{-}|)$$ and ψ = (ϕ + − ϕ )/2.

### Performance of rotatable polarization setup

Ideally, the RP-THz-TDS should have a minimal variation in the amplitude of the electric field $$|{\boldsymbol{E}}|={({E}_{x}^{2}+{E}_{y}^{2})}^{\mathrm{1/2}}$$ with emitter angle ψ em, in order to obtain a good signal-to-noise ratio for all polarization directions. The vertical and horizontal components of the peak THz electric field are shown in Fig. 1(d) versus ψ em by the red and green lines, respectively. When the applied electric field in the emitter was vertical, close to ψ em = 0° and 180°, the amplitude of E y was a maximum, while E x was greatest near ψ em = 90°. A small offset in the emitter angle compared to the orientation angle can be identified, for instance by the small E x component at ψ em = 0. The total amplitude of the THz electric field |E| initially varied by 20% across the full range of rotation. A motorized HWP was then added to the THz generation beam, to co-rotate the pump polarization along with the emitter, keeping the pump’s polarization parallel to the gold contacts. This optional step reduced the variation in |E(ψ em)| to less than 7%, as shown by the blue curve in Fig. 1(d), ensuring that a good signal-to-noise can be obtained for all incident polarization states.

Further, an ideal RP-THz-TDS setup would exhibit minimal variation in ellipticity χ with emitter angle ψ em, and precise and accurate knowledge of χ and ψ. Polarization-resolved time-domain waveforms of the pulses were recorded at each ψ em in 2.5° steps over a 180° rotation. One such time-domain waveform can be seen in Fig. 2(a), at ψ em = 140°. The ellipticity at 1.0 THz as a function of ψ em is reported in Fig. 2(b). The average χ of THz pulses from the emitter was 0.925°, which varied by 0.75° over a 180° rotation, demonstrating that the polarization remained close to linear for all ψ em. The small measured ellipticity may be an artifact of a slight misalignment of the gate and THz beams while propagating through the detection crystal27. However, this small ellipticity, reported here for the first time for an interdigitated THz emitter, is much smaller than the ellipticity $$\chi \sim {10}^{\circ }$$ of wide-area emitters20 and dipole antenna28. While a small quadrupole moment may contribute to the finite ellipticity in these two cases28, the small ellipticity in our case may result from the gold fingers, which in essence act as a wire-grid polarizer within the near-field of the generated THz radiation.

In order to determine precisely which emitter angle ψ em corresponded to a horizontally polarized pulse (where ψ = 0°) the orientation angle of the incident pulse at 1.0 THz was measured as a function of emitter angle, shown in Fig. 2(c). A linear fit to the data gives an emitter angle of 83.85° for ψ = 0°. Thus the THz orientation angle ψ in incident on a sample was calibrated precisely for each ψ em. Zero ψ in corresponds to a horizontally polarized incident pulse and ψ in = ±90° corresponds to vertically polarized incident pulses of opposite polarity.

The frequency response of the RP-THz-TDS system is reported in the following section, along with a comparison to an alternative polarization rotation method using a WGP, as often used in THz ellipsometry13 and polarimetry schemes29.

### Performance of RP-THz-TDS compared to WGP projection

Static or continuously rotatable WGPs are commonly used in polarization-resolved detection schemes to determine the orthogonal components of the electric field29,30. By projecting linear polarization states along different directions the direct detection of orthogonal components of E is not required. However, these methods suffer from the poor extinction ratio of WGPs4,31, which is frequency dependent. Further, there is a π/2 phase shift between light parallel to and perpendicular to the wires32 that introduces a finite ellipticity to the transmitted beam, which we show below.

To illustrate the advantages of the RP-THz-TDS method over polarization rotation via WGPs, we compared the polarization state produced using a WGP with that directly from our rotatable polarization setup. A perfect WGP at an arbitrary angle should fully transmit the component of the electric field perpendicular to the wires and transmit none of the component parallel to the wires, hence transmitting a polarization state rotated with respect to the original with a reduced amplitude and minimal ellipticity. A WGP was produced by UV photolithography, and consisted of gold wires with 8 μm width and 20 μm period on a semi-insulating GaAs substrate. The WGP was held in a manual rotation mount at the sample position, and was rotated to an arbitrary angle. This angle was precisely identified as ψ in = −35.0°, by scanning ψ in over a range of 20° in 0.625° steps around the approximate direction perpendicular to the wires and determining the angle at which the transmitted THz amplitude |E| was a maximum. The emitter was then rotated by 45° such that the THz pulse incident on the WGP would have equal components parallel and perpendicular to the wires. The frequency dependent ellipticity and orientation angle are shown by the blue lines in Fig. 2(d) and (e), respectively. The WGP produces a highly frequency-dependent elliptical pulse, which is approaching circular polarization for frequencies above 3.0 THz. This ellipticity occurs due to the finite transmission of the component of the THz electric field parallel to the wires; this component is the first time derivative of the incident field32, and is therefore phase-shifted by a factor of π/2 with respect to the orthogonal component perpendicular to the wires. The orientation angle also deviates significantly from the intended angle of ψ = −35.0°, by 2.0° in the best case (low frequency), and with larger change as the transmitted pulse becomes more elliptical.

The WGP was then removed and the emitter rotated back by 45°, to the same angle as defined by the WGP. The frequency dependence of the ellipticity and orientation angle is shown by the red lines in Fig. 2(d) and (e), respectively. The rotatable polarization method produces a linear THz pulse over the whole experimental bandwidth when rotated to an arbitrary angle, with an ellipticity of ≤0.75° and a statistical error (the precision) in the ellipticity of <0.05° over the 0.3–1.5 THz range (<0.1° from 0.3–2.5 THz) after 20 repeated measurements. The accuracy of the orientation angle was defined as the variation of ψ(ω) away from the mean30, and was <1.0° between 0.3–2.5 THz. The statistical error in the orientation angle was <0.05° between 0.3–1.5 THz (<0.1° from 0.3–2.5 THz).

The above demonstrates the drawbacks in using WGPs in polarization-resolved detection or in ellipsometric schemes to study anisotropic materials. While the above WGP may not be competitive with the best commercial WGPs (which have smaller periods), any WGP will introduce uncertainty into the identification of optical properties. Comparatively, RP-THz-TDS does not suffer from this issue, and has an accuracy and precision comparable to the best ellipsometric methods30. In the following sections we utilize RP-THz-TDS to study birefringent media that are uniaxial (ZnO and LaAlO3) or biaxial (CuO).

### RP-THz-TDS of uniaxial ZnO and LaAlO3

To demonstrate how RP-THz-TDS can be used to investigate anisotropic media, we first studied a uniaxial crystal, ZnO. With a hexagonal structure (space group C6mc), ZnO consists of alternating hexagonal stacks of Zn2+ and O2− ions along the c-axis, with each Zn2+ ion coordinated tetrahedrally with the O2−, and vice versa. By considering the crystal’s symmetry the number of independent components of ε can be reduced. The dielectric tensor for a uniaxial crystal can be expressed as

$${\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}=(\begin{array}{ccc}{\varepsilon }_{xx} & 0 & 0\\ 0 & {\varepsilon }_{xx} & 0\\ 0 & 0 & {\varepsilon }_{zz}\end{array}),$$
(2)

where ε xx and ε zz are the components of the dielectric tensor along the mutually orthogonal principal axes of the material x, y and z, ε xx = ε yy , and z is the optical axis. Since the dielectric tensor is diagonal, the polarization eigenmodes u 1,2 are along the principal axes. For light beams propagating along the optical axis (where $${\boldsymbol{k}}\times \hat{{\boldsymbol{z}}}=0$$) the refractive index is independent of the polarization direction, and hence there is no birefringence. When light propagates along any other direction ($${\boldsymbol{k}}\times \hat{{\boldsymbol{z}}}\ne 0$$) the polarization eigenmodes will have different propagation speeds, and hence the material is birefringent.

Here measurements were performed on a 0.6 mm thick single crystal of ZnO, oriented with the a-axis as the surface normal and the c-axis in the plane. The birefringence in the THz range can be linked to the differences in phonon mode frequency and strength for directions parallel to and perpendicular to c 21, and also to any additional anisotropy in the electronic contribution to the dielectric function.

An example polarization-resolved time-domain waveform after transmission through ZnO is reported in Fig. 3(a), at the same emitter angle as Fig. 2(a), demonstrating how a phase delay between the components of the THz electric field propagating along the fast and slow axes of ZnO produces an elliptical polarization state. When ψ in is midway between the fast and slow axes the ellipticity χ of the pulse transmitted through ZnO will be a maximum, while conversely χ = 0 when ψ in is parallel to a polarization eigenvector. Therefore, by rotating the incident THz polarization state and measuring χ at each angle, the polarization eigenvectors can be accurately determined. Figure 3(b) shows the evolution of χ as a function of frequency after transmission through ZnO, as ψ in is varied over 180°. Zero χ occurs around ψ in = 4° and ψ in = 94°, identifying the polarization eigenvectors. Tracing the evolution of χ with frequency, right- and left-handed circularly polarized states can be observed for certain ψ in at 0.75 and 2.25 THz, where the ZnO is acting as a quarter-wave plate, and between these frequencies the polarization state becomes linear again at 1.5 THz, where the ZnO acts as a half-wave plate.

Figure 3(c) shows the frequency dependence of χ for ψ in = 26.0° (red dots), ψ in = 56.0° (green dots) and ψ in = 71.0° (blue dots). The solid lines are the calculated ellipticity at each angle, represented by the same color, of an initially linearly polarized pulse transmitted through ZnO of the same thickness as the experimental sample. The birefringence Δn = n 1 − n 2 of ZnO was assumed to be frequency dependent and was modeled as Δn = Δn 0 + αf, where f is the frequency in THz. A quadratic component to the birefringence was also considered, but was found to be negligible in the experimental frequency range. Using this model and fitting to the experimental data gave Δn 0 = 0.14 and α = 0.011 THz−1. A linear fit to Δn over the experimental frequency range 0.5–2.5 THz is reasonable, as the lowest infrared active phonon modes in ZnO occur at 11.5 and 12.5 THz for the A 1 and E 1 modes respectively21.

To further utilize our RP-THz-TDS setup we examined an inhomogeneous uniaxial crystal, LaAlO3. At room temperature LaAlO3 is a rhombohedral perovskite with space group $$R\bar{3}c$$ 33. The optical axis is in the [111] pseudocubic direction5. While ZnO forms a homogeneous single crystal, LaAlO3 is inhomogeneous with twin domains bounded along the [010] direction. The size of these twin domains has been shown to sensitively influence the apparent birefringence in the THz region5. Here, measurements were performed on a 0.5 mm thick [001]-oriented single crystal of LaAlO3, with twin domains that were small in comparison to the THz spot size. The in-plane crystallographic directions were oriented arbitrarily with respect to the incident THz polarization.

The variation of the change in ellipticity Δχ = χ sample − χ reference with ψ in of pulses after transmission through LaAlO3 is presented in Fig. 3(d), at 1.0 (red), 1.5 (green) and 1.75 THz (blue). By considering Δχ rather than χ the influence of the finite ellipticity of the reference pulses is removed, and only the influence of the sample on the ellipticity remains. This allows greater sensitivity when investigating materials in which the birefringence is small, as it is at low frequency in this particular sample of LaAlO3. Δχ was fit to a cosine model (solid lines), Acos(B(ψ em + ϕ)) + C, where A, B and C are constants and ϕ is a phase offset, which gave Δχ = 0° at −16.5° and 76.0°, corresponding to the directions of the polarization eigenvectors. The directions of the eigenvectors measured here are given to a precision of ±1.25°, limited by the angular step size of the scan.

The change in ellipticity when ψ in is parallel to and midway between the polarization eigenvectors is reported in Fig. 3(e). When probing along the eigenvectors Δχ = 0 (green and purple lines), whilst when probing at the midpoints Δχ increases nonlinearly with frequency (red and blue lines) towards the lowest phonon modes of LaAlO3 5. The birefringence of LaAlO3 was calculated similarly to the method used previously for ZnO, by assuming a frequency dependent model Δn = Δn 0 + βf2 and calculating the frequency dependent change in ellipticity for certain ψ in, giving Δn 0 = 0.0045 and β = 0.0065 THz−3. As with ZnO, a linear term to Δn was considered, but was found to be negligible for LaAlO3. The difference in the frequency dependence to the birefringence in LaAlO3 compared to ZnO is due to its lower frequency infrared active phonon modes, at 5.0 and 5.5 THz for the A 1 and E 1 modes respectively5, which occur closer to the experimental frequency range.

### RP-THz-TDS of electromagnon absorption in CuO

To demonstrate how RP-THz-TDS can be used to investigate the absorptive properties of anisotropic media, the dependence of the electromagnon absorption on the incident THz orientation angle was investigated in CuO. With a monoclinic crystal structure (space group C2/c), CuO is a biaxial crystal. CuO exhibits four magnetic phases in zero external field, a high temperature paramagnetic state (PM), a low temperature antiferromagnetic state (AF1), a multiferroic state (AF2) between 213–229.3 K, and an intermediate antiferromagnetic phase (AF3) between 229.3–230 K34,35. The multiferroic state hosts a collective excitation known as an electromagnon, an electric-dipole-active magnon, at THz frequencies7,36. The electromagnon absorbs light only for electric field oriented close to the [101] direction. Since a cryostat is required to access the temparature range at which the electromagnon is active, rotating the THz polarization state (rather than the sample) is a highly convenient method to probe its anisotropic optical properties. Here, measurements were performed on a 1.3 mm thick single crystal of CuO that was aligned by Laue X-ray diffraction to have a $$\mathrm{(10}\bar{1})$$ surface normal. Thus, the [101] and [010] directions are in-plane, and the sample was oriented in the spectrometer such that the [101] direction is close to ψ in = 0°. RP-THz-TDS was performed at 210 K, in the AF1 phase, and at 215 K, in the AF2 phase.

To examine the electromagnon’s absorption and to precisely determine its selection rule, we examined the temperature-dependent change in absorption coefficient between the AF1 and AF2 phase, expressed as $${\rm{\Delta }}\alpha (\omega ,{\psi }_{{\rm{in}}})=(-\mathrm{2/}d)\mathrm{ln}|\tilde{T}(\omega ,{\psi }_{{\rm{in}}})|$$, where d is the sample thickness and $$|\tilde{T}(\omega ,{\psi }_{{\rm{in}}})|$$ is the absolute part of the complex transmission function. To find the transmission function $$|\tilde{T}|$$ at each value of ψ in we found the ratio of the total transmitted intensity using $$|\tilde{T}(\omega )|={({|{\tilde{E}}_{{\rm{H}}}^{{\rm{s}}}(\omega )|}^{2}+{|{\tilde{E}}_{{\rm{V}}}^{{\rm{s}}}(\omega )|}^{2})}^{\mathrm{1/2}}/{({|{\tilde{E}}_{x}^{{\rm{r}}}(\omega )|}^{2}+{|{\tilde{E}}_{y}^{{\rm{r}}}(\omega )|}^{2})}^{\mathrm{1/2}}$$, where the superscripts s and r denote the sample (at 215 K) and reference (at 210 K) spectra, and the subscripts x and y denote the horizontally and vertically polarized components, respectively.

The change in absorption induced by multiferroicity, Δα(ω), as ψ in is varied is reported in Fig. 4(a). The electromagnon is evident as a peak in Δα around 0.7 THz with a weaker tail at higher frequencies, and a strength that decreases as ψ in moves away from [101] (close to ψ in = 0°) towards [010] (close to ψ in = ±90°). This verifies that the electromagnon is only excited when applying a THz electric field along the [101] direction, as reported by Jones et al.7 using measurements at only a few fixed angles. A cut through the peak of the absorption at 0.72 THz is shown in Fig. 4(b), represented by the dashed line in Fig. 4(a). The maximum change in absorption occurs when ψ in = 6°, with a precision of 5° defined by half the angular step size of the scan. To more precisely determine the orientation of maximum absorption, an angular range of 40° containing the peak of the absorption was scanned with a smaller angular step size, shown in the inset of Fig. 4(b). The experimental data (dots) were fit (solid line) to a cosine model, A cos(2(ψ in + ϕ)) + C, where A and C are constants and ϕ is a phase offset. From this fit the angle of maximum absorption occurs at ψ in = 5°. Also in Fig. 4(a) as ψ in approaches ±90°, where it is close to the [010] direction, Δα is observed to be negative, corresponding to more transmission in the AF2 phase. This occurs due to the static polarization along [010] in the multiferroic phase altering the absorption of the higher-lying phonon modes22.

Due to its monoclinic crystal structure, the dielectric tensor in CuO is

$${\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}=(\begin{array}{ccc}{\varepsilon }_{xx} & 0 & {\varepsilon }_{xz}\\ 0 & {\varepsilon }_{yy} & 0\\ {\varepsilon }_{zx} & 0 & {\varepsilon }_{zz}\end{array}),$$
(3)

where $$x\parallel a,y\parallel b\,{\rm{a}}{\rm{n}}{\rm{d}}\,c\parallel {c}^{\ast }$$ 37. The ellipticity after transmission through CuO at 215 K is shown in Fig. 4(c). The region where χ ≈ 0 occupies a range of around 6° centered on ψ in = 4°, represented by the dashed line in Fig. 4(c). This is in agreement with the angle of maximum Δα determined from the inset of Fig. 4(b), suggesting that this polarization eigenvector coincides with the [101] direction. The birefringence in CuO was calculated using the same method as above for ZnO and LaAlO3, and was found to be linearly dependent on frequency, Δn = Δn 0 + αf with Δn 0 = 0.14 and α = 0.03 THz−1.

From Fig. 4(c) it can be observed that the eigenvector along [101] demonstrates chromatic dispersion, i.e. a frequency dependence to its direction. This can be seen as a deviation in the ψ in for which χ = 0° away from the dashed line at ψ in = 4°, highlighted by the shorter dashed line. The rotation of the polarization eigenvector away from [101] as a result of chromatic dispersion is almost 20° at 1.2 THz. For comparison, Fig. 3(b) shows that the polarization eigenvectors in ZnO occur at a constant ψ in. In a monoclinic crystal, a preferential triplet of orthogonal directions is not compatible with the crystalline symmetry38. The frequency dependence of the complex components of the dielectric tensor causes the principal axes of the crystal, and hence the propagation eigenvectors u 1,2, to also vary with frequency. In monoclinic crystals two of the principal axes are colour dispersive, while one principal axis has a fixed direction38. From equation 3, since there are no off-diagional components to the dielectric tensor involving y, the fixed principal axis will occur along the b direction, and the two colour dispersive axes will lie in the ac-plane. In this particular case, light propagates along the $$\mathrm{(10}\bar{1})$$ surface normal, which has been found previously to be a principal axis of the dc dielectric tensor37. The observation of birefringence for this k means that $$\mathrm{(10}\bar{1})$$ is not an optical axis.

## Discussion

A convenient method to study the optical properties at THz frequencies of anisotropic materials was introduced and validated, meeting the criteria of a minimal change in electric field amplitude and polarization state upon polarization rotation across the entire experimental bandwidth. The precision of the ellipticity angle and orientation angle was better than 0.1° from 0.3–2.5 THz. The rotatable polarization method was applied to study a wire-grid polarizer, which was found to produce elliptically polarized THz pulses when the incident pulse was at an arbitrary angle to the wires. The good precision in ψ and χ was beneficial for the precise determination of the birefringence and polarization eigenvectors of uniaxial (ZnO, LaAlO3) and biaxial (CuO) crystals. In the latter case, the polarization-rotation method was used to find the exact angle of peak electromagnon absorption in the improper ferroelectric phase of CuO, to more precisely study its selection rule. This new approach is beneficial for the study of anisotropic compounds, as there is no need to rotate the sample, which can be impractical, for instance for samples held in a cryostat.

## Methods

Interdigitated photoconductive emitters were realized on 0.5 mm-thick semi-insulating GaAs substrates by standard photolithography. One such emitter is shown schematically in Fig. 1(a). The photoactive area was 2.0 mm × 1.3 mm and consisted of gold strips with a 5 μm width and a 5 μm spacing (200 strips within the 2.0 mm width). To avoid destructive interference, further gold strips covered every other gap (Au mask). In order to prevent short circuiting, a 110 nm layer of insulating Al2O3 vertically separated the mask and bias contacts. Such a thickness was chosen in order to maximize the transmission of the 800 nm photoexcitation beam. The THz generation beam [red waveform in Fig. 1(a)] had a power of 200 mW, and photoexcited carriers in the GaAs substrate. These were accelerated under the applied voltage (±10 V), and generated a THz pulse (blue waveform).

### Data Availability

Data related to this publication is available from the University of Warwick data archive at http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/89269.

## References

1. 1.

Jepsen, P., Cooke, D. & Koch, M. Terahertz spectroscopy and imaging - Modern techniques and applications. Laser & Photonics Reviews 5, 124–166 (2011).

2. 2.

Ulbricht, R., Hendry, E., Shan, J., Heinz, T. F. & Bonn, M. Carrier dynamics in semiconductors studied with time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy. Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 543–586 (2011).

3. 3.

Lloyd-Hughes, J. & Jeon, T.-I. A Review of the Terahertz Conductivity of Bulk and Nano-Materials. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 33, 871–925 (2012).

4. 4.

Wiesauer, K. & Jördens, C. Recent Advances in Birefringence Studies at THz Frequencies. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 34, 663–681 (2013).

5. 5.

Lloyd-Hughes, J., Jones, S. P. P., Castro-Camus, E., Doig, K. I. & MacManus-Driscoll, J. L. Modifying the polarization state of terahertz radiation using anisotropic twin-domains in LaAlO3. Optics Letters 39, 1121 (2014).

6. 6.

Arikawa, T., Zhang, Q., Ren, L., Belyanin, A. A. & Kono, J. Review of Anisotropic Terahertz Material Response. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 34, 724–739 (2013).

7. 7.

Jones, S. P. et al. High-temperature electromagnons in the magnetically induced multiferroic cupric oxide driven by intersublattice exchange. Nature Communications 5, 3787, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4787 (2014).

8. 8.

Failla, M. et al. Terahertz quantum Hall effect for spin-split heavy-hole gases in strained Ge quantum wells. New Journal of Physics 18, 113036, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113036 (2016).

9. 9.

Ade, P. et al. Free-standing grids wound from 5 μm diameter wire for spectroscopy at far-infrared wavelengths. Infrared Physics 19, 599–601 (1979).

10. 10.

Masson, J.-B. & Gallot, G. Terahertz achromatic quarter-wave plate. Optics Letters 31, 265 (2006).

11. 11.

Castro-Camus, E. & Johnston, M. B. Extraction of the anisotropic dielectric properties of materials from polarization-resolved terahertz time-domain spectra. J. Opt. A-Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 105206 (2009).

12. 12.

Kim, Y., Yi, M., Kim, B. G. & Ahn, J. Investigation of THz birefringence measurement and calculation in Al2O3 and LiNbO3. Applied Optics 50, 2906 (2011).

13. 13.

Neshat, M. & Armitage, N. P. Developments in THz Range Ellipsometry. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 34, 682–708 (2013).

14. 14.

Nakata, Y., Taira, Y., Nakanishi, T. & Miyamaru, F. Freestanding transparent terahertz half-wave plate using subwavelength cut-wire pairs. Optics Express 25, 2107, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.002107 (2017).

15. 15.

Cong, L. et al. A perfect metamaterial polarization rotator. Applied Physics Letters 103, 171107 (2013).

16. 16.

Cheng, Y. et al. Ultrabroadband reflective polarization convertor for terahertz waves. Applied Physics Letters 105, 181111 (2014).

17. 17.

Cong, L., Xu, N., Han, J., Zhang, W. & Singh, R. A Tunable Dispersion-Free Terahertz Metadevice with Pancharatnam-Berry-Phase-Enabled Modulation and Polarization Control. Advanced Materials 27, 6630 (2015).

18. 18.

Kawada, Y. et al. Achromatic prism-type wave plate for broadband terahertz pulses. Optics Letters 39, 2794 (2014).

19. 19.

Wen, H. & Lindenberg, A. M. Coherent Terahertz Polarization Control through Manipulation of Electron Trajectories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 23902 (2009).

20. 20.

Castro-Camus, E. et al. Polarisation-sensitive terahertz detection by multicontact photoconductive receivers. Applied Physics Letters 86, 3 (2005).

21. 21.

Kim, Y., Ahn, J., Kim, B. G. & Yee, D.-S. Terahertz Birefringence in Zinc Oxide. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 50, 030203 (2011).

22. 22.

Jones, S. P. P. et al. Influence of nonmagnetic Zn substitution on the lattice and magnetoelectric dynamical properties of the multiferroic material CuO. Physical Review B 90, 064405 (2014).

23. 23.

Makabe, H., Hirota, Y., Tani, M. & Hangyo, M. Polarization state measurement of terahertz electromagnetic radiation by three-contact photoconductive antenna. Opt. Express 15, 11650–11657, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.011650 (2007).

24. 24.

Hirota, Y., Hattori, R., Tani, M. & Hangyo, M. Polarization modulation of terahertz electromagnetic radiation by four-contact photoconductive antenna. Opt. Express 14, 4486–4493, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.004486 (2006).

25. 25.

Zhang, L., Zhong, H., Deng, C., Zhang, C. & Zhao, Y. Polarization sensitive terahertz time-domain spectroscopy for birefringent materials. Applied Physics Letters 94 (2009).

26. 26.

van der Valk, N. C. J., van der Marel, W. A. M. & Planken, P. C. M. Terahertz polarization imaging. Opt. Lett. 30, 2802 (2005).

27. 27.

van der Valk, N. C. J., Wenckebach, T. & Planken, P. C. M. Full mathematical description of electro-optic detection in optically isotropic crystals. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 21, 622 (2004).

28. 28.

Van Rudd, J., Johnson, J. L. & Mittleman, D. M. Cross-polarized angular emission patterns from lens-coupled terahertz antennas. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 18, 1524 (2001).

29. 29.

Morikawa, O. et al. Faraday ellipticity and Faraday rotation of a doped-silicon wafer studied by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. Journal of Applied Physics 100, 033105 (2006).

30. 30.

Morris, C. M., Aguilar, R. V., Stier, A. V. & Armitage, N. P. Polarization modulation time-domain terahertz polarimetry. Optics Express 20, 12303–12317, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.012303 (2012).

31. 31.

Castro-Camus, E. Polarization-resolved terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves 33, 418–430 (2012).

32. 32.

Filin, A., Stowe, M. & Kersting, R. Time-domain differentiation of terahertz pulses. Optics Letters 26, 2008 (2001).

33. 33.

Hayward, S. A. et al. Transformation processes in LaAlO3: Neutron diffraction, dielectric, thermal, optical, and Raman studies. Physical Review B 72, 054110 (2005).

34. 34.

Kimura, T., Sekio, Y., Nakamura, H., Siegrist, T. & Ramirez, A. P. Cupric oxide as an induced-multiferroic with high-Tc. Nature Materials 7, 291–294 (2008).

35. 35.

Villarreal, R. et al. Magnetic Phase Diagram of CuO via High-Resolution Ultrasonic Velocity Measurements. Physical Review Letters 109, 167206 (2012).

36. 36.

Cao, K., Giustino, F. & Radaelli, P. G. Theory of Electromagnons in CuO. Physical Review Letters 114, 197201 (2015).

37. 37.

Kuz’menko, A. B. et al. Infrared spectroscopic study of CuO: Signatures of strong spin-phonon interaction and structural distortion. Physical Review B 63, 094303 (2001).

38. 38.

Born, M. & Wolf, E. Principles of Optics, 7th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2006).

## Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the EPSRC (UK). The authors would like to thank M.A. Crouch for technical assistance.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

C.D.W.M., M.F. and J.L. conceived the experiments, P.D. provided the CuO sample, and C.D.W.M., M.F. and J.L. conducted the experiments. All authors analysed the results and reviewed the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Lloyd-Hughes.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Mosley, C.D.W., Failla, M., Prabhakaran, D. et al. Terahertz spectroscopy of anisotropic materials using beams with rotatable polarization. Sci Rep 7, 12337 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12568-0

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Three-dimensional cross-nanowire networks recover full terahertz state

• Kun Peng
• , Dimitars Jevtics
• , Fanlu Zhang
• , Sabrina Sterzl
• , Djamshid A. Damry
• , Mathias U. Rothmann
• , Benoit Guilhabert
• , Michael J. Strain
• , Hark H. Tan
• , Laura M. Herz
• , Lan Fu
• , Martin D. Dawson
•  & Michael B. Johnston

Science (2020)

• ### Optical constants of CuO and ZnO particles in the terahertz frequency range

• Jaume Calvo-de la Rosa
• , Alexandre Locquet
• , Denis Bouscaud
• , Sophie Berveiller
•  & D.S. Citrin

Ceramics International (2020)

• ### Scalable interdigitated photoconductive emitters for the electrical modulation of terahertz beams with arbitrary linear polarization

• C. D. W. Mosley
• , M. Staniforth
• , A. I. Hernandez Serrano
• , E. Pickwell-MacPherson
•  & J. Lloyd-Hughes

• ### A dual-port THz Time Domain Spectroscopy System optimized for recovery of a sample’s Jones matrix

• Guozhong Zhao
• , Giorgio Savini
• , Yang Yu
• , Shuai Li
• , Jin Zhang

Scientific Reports (2019)

• ### Polarization-Sensitive Electro-Optic Sampling of Elliptically-Polarized Terahertz Pulses: Theoretical Description and Experimental Demonstration

• Kenichi Oguchi
• , Makoto Okano
•  & Shinichi Watanabe

Particles (2019)