Abstract
Skyrmions are localized, topologically nontrivial spin structures which have raised high hopes for future spintronic applications. A key issue is skyrmion stability with respect to annihilation into the ferromagnetic state. Energy barriers for this collapse have been calculated taking only nearest neighbor exchange interactions into account. Here, we demonstrate that exchange frustration can greatly enhance skyrmion stability. We focus on the prototypical film system Pd/Fe/Ir(111) and use an atomistic spin model parametrized from firstprinciples calculations. We show that energy barriers and critical fields of skyrmion collapse as well as skyrmion lifetimes are drastically enhanced due to frustrated exchange and that antiskyrmions are metastable. In contrast an effective nearestneighbor exchange model can only account for equilibrium properties of skyrmions such as their magnetic field dependent profile or the zero temperature phase diagram. Our work shows that frustration of long range exchange interactions – a typical feature in itinerant electron magnets – is a route towards enhanced skyrmion stability even in systems with a ferromagnetic ground state.
Introduction
Skyrmions have been predicted to occur in magnetic materials based on micromagnetic models more than 25 years ago^{1,2}. Experimentally skyrmions were first observed in bulk materials with a chiral crystal structure^{3,4,5}. In these systems skyrmions are stabilized by the DzyaloshinskiiMoriya interaction (DMI)^{6,7}. The DMI occurs due to spinorbit coupling (SOC) in systems with a broken structural inversion symmetry. Therefore, it is present also at surfaces or interfaces^{8,9} and can induce spin spirals^{9,10}, chiral domain walls^{11,12,13,14,15} and skyrmions^{16,17}. Since transitionmetal interfaces and multilayers are at the heart of technologically established spintronic devices such as read heads of harddisk drives based on the giant magnetoresistance effect^{18,19} the discovery of skyrmions at interfaces^{16,17} sparked great interest in using them for novel device concepts^{20,21}.
For potential applications^{20,21,22,23} the stability of magnetic skyrmions becomes a crucial issue. An experimentally well studied system for nanoscale skyrmions at interfaces is Pd/Fe/Ir(111)^{17,24,25,26,27}, i.e. a single atomic layer of Pd grown on an Fe monolayer on the Ir(111) surface. Based on fitting field dependent experimental skyrmion profiles to the micromagnetic model effective parameters have been obtained^{24} which were used to discuss properties of isolated skyrmions^{27}. Currentinduced skyrmion annihilation has also been studied combining the experiments with MonteCarlo simulations from which energy barriers of about 50 meV have been estimated^{26}. Energy barriers protecting skyrmion states in ultrathin films have been obtained by calculating minimum energy paths (MEPs) for the skyrmion collapse into the ferromagnetic state^{28,29,30,31} which due to the huge configuration space is a nontrivial task^{32,33}.
While an atomistic spin model has been used in these approaches, the exchange interaction has been treated within the nearestneighbor (NN) approximation which corresponds to the exchange stiffness within the micromagnetic model. For Pd/Fe/Ir(111) it has been shown based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations that the exchange interaction is ferromagnetic for NN while it is antiferromagnetic for the 2nd and 3rd NN^{34,35}. The effect of exchange frustration on skyrmion lattice formation has been studied in refs^{36,37,38,39}. Therefore, it is not clear in how far spin models using an effective NN exchange interaction are sufficient to describe properties of isolated skyrmions in these systems.
Here, we demonstrate that frustrated exchange greatly enhances skyrmion stability in ultrathin films and can lead to metastable antiskyrmions. We use atomistic spin dynamics simulations parametrized from DFT for Pd/Fe/Ir(111) and obtain energy barriers for skyrmion annihilation into the ferromagnetic state by applying the geodesic nudged elastic band (GNEB) approach^{28}. We compare these calculations with an effective NN exchange model based on our DFT calculations which yields parameters that are in good agreement with those obtained from experiments^{24,26}. We find that equilibrium skyrmion properties such as fielddependent profiles or the zero temperature phase diagram are well described by the effective NN exchange approach. However, energy barriers of skyrmion collapse and skyrmion lifetimes are greatly underestimated if the frustrated exchange interaction is mapped to an effective NN exchange. Antiskyrmions are not even metastable in the effective NN exchange model.
Results
Atomistic spin model
We describe the magnetic properties of Pd/Fe/Ir(111) using the spin Hamiltonian given by
which describes the magnetic interactions between the magnetic moments M _{ i } of atoms at sites R _{ i } where m _{i} = M _{i}/M_{i}. The parameters for the exchange interaction (J _{ ij }), the DMI (D _{ij}), the magnetic moments (μ _{ s }) as well as an uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy (K) were obtained from DFT using the FLEUR code^{34,40,41,42} (see methods for details). Note that J _{ ij } and D _{ij} are defined per spin because each pairwise interaction contributes twice in the total energy. We do not explicitly include dipoledipole interactions. However, for ultrathin films this energy term is very small – on the order of 0.1 meV/atom – and it can be effectively included into the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy^{30,43}.
While the Fe layer follows the fcc stacking of the Ir(111) surface, both Pd stackings have been observed experimentally^{44}. Figure 1a shows the energy dispersions E(q) of flat homogeneous spin spirals including the effect of SOC calculated from DFT for both hcp and fcc stacking of the Pd overlayer. A spin spiral is characterized by a wave vector q from the twodimensional Brillouin zone (2DBZ) and the magnetic moment of an atom at site R _{i} is given by \({{\bf{M}}}_{i}=M(\sin ({\bf{q}}{{\bf{R}}}_{i}),\,\cos ({\bf{q}}{{\bf{R}}}_{i}),\,\mathrm{0)}\) with the size of the magnetic moment M. We find a value of about 2.7 μ _{B} per Featom in our calculations which is fairly constant for all q vectors. Combined with the magnetic moment of 0.3 μ _{B} due to spin polarization of the Pdatoms, we obtain a total moment of 3.0 μ _{B} that we use for our simulations. Fitting the energy dispersions along the high symmetry directions of the 2DBZ using the first two terms of Eq. (1) allows to extract the exchange constants and the DMI (see Table 1). Note that the stacking of the Pd overlayer affects the RudermanKittelKasuyaYosida type exchange mediated by conduction electrons due to the key role played by the hybridization at the Pd/Fe/Ir interface^{34}. Our computed shell resolved J _{ ij } agree well with those presented in ref.^{35}. In order to obtain a good fit of the DFT energy dispersion many shells need to be taken into account for the exchange while the DMI has been treated in the NN approximation.
It has been suggested to characterize the behavior of the exchange interaction close to the \(\bar{{\rm{\Gamma }}}\) point of the 2DBZ – corresponding to the ferromagnetic (FM) state – by an effective NN exchange constant J _{eff} ^{45} – an approach which has also been used in previous theoretical studies of skyrmion stability^{26,27,28}.
From our DFT energy dispersion we can obtain J _{eff} by using only the NN terms of the first two terms in the spin Hamiltonian, Eq. (1), which yields along the \(\bar{{\rm{\Gamma }}}\bar{{\rm{K}}}\) direction \(E(q)={J}_{{\rm{eff}}}(2\,\cos (q)+4\,\cos (q\mathrm{/2)})\) (with q in units of 2π/a, see Table 2 for J _{eff}). We obtain an excellent approximation around the local spin spiral energy minimum (cf. inset of Fig. 1a). However, the fit drastically underestimates E(q) from DFT for larger values of q. For fccPd/Fe/Ir(111) we had to fit also the DMI to obtain a good agreement. For spin spirals along \(\bar{{\rm{\Gamma }}}\bar{{\rm{K}}}\) we use \(E(q)={J}_{{\rm{eff}}}(2\,\cos (q)+4\,\cos (q\mathrm{/2)})+{D}_{{\rm{eff}}}(2\,\sin (q)+2\,\sin (q\mathrm{/2)})\) and a fit interval close to the energy minimum (see Table 2 for J _{eff} and D _{eff}).
Effective NN exchange and DMI for Pd/Fe/Ir(111) have previously been extracted by fitting experimental data to micromagnetic and MonteCarlo simulations^{24,26} (for values see Table 2). The energy dispersions obtained with these values are displayed in Fig. 1a. These curves are between the DFT dispersions for hcp and fcc Pd stacking around the energy minimum (cf. inset of Fig. 1a). For larger values of q, i.e. larger angles between adjacent spins, they are close to the effective fit in fcc stacking but deviate drastically from the DFT curves.
Zero temperature phase diagrams
To compare the effective description of the exchange (denoted as J _{eff}) and DMI (for fccPd/Fe/Ir(111)) and the full set of exchange constants from DFT (denoted as J _{DFT}), we have obtained the phase diagram at zero temperature as a function of the applied magnetic field (Fig. 1b–e) using spindynamics simulations (see methods). Note that we have used the magnetocrystalline anisotropy obtained from DFT in both cases.
For hcpPd/Fe/Ir(111) the phase diagrams are very similar for both ways of treating the exchange [Fig. 1b,c]. The FM state is the ground state over the whole range of magnetic field values. Homogeneous spin spirals relax into a domain wall structure which gains energy due to DMI^{11}. Isolated skyrmions are metastable for both sets of parameters when an external field of at least ≈0.5 T is applied. For smaller fields, the skyrmions become large bubbles with a fixed rotational sense of the domain walls surrounding the FM core.
For fccPd/Fe/Ir(111) [Fig. 1d,e] the ground state is a spin spiral consistent with the energy minimum in the spin spiral dispersion curve (cf. inset of Fig. 1a). For both J _{eff} and J _{DFT} a skyrmion lattice is energetically favorable at a critical field and at even larger fields there is a transition to the FM phase. However, the critical fields at which these transitions occur are slightly different (\({B}_{{\rm{c}}}^{{\rm{eff}}}\approx 3.6\) T and \({B}_{{\rm{c}}}^{{\rm{DFT}}}\approx 3.2\) T) due to the larger DMI obtained by the fit. Using the full set of DFT parameters we were also able to metastabilize antiskyrmions within the skyrmion lattice and FM phase.
Skyrmion radius
In the FM phase isolated skyrmions are metastable in our spin dynamics simulations up to a critical field for both hcpPd/Fe/Ir(111) and fccPd/Fe/Ir(111). The skyrmion profiles were obtained by imposing the theoretical profile^{46} and relaxing this spin structure within our spin dynamics simulation. The radii were extracted as in ref.^{46}. The obtained relaxed skyrmion profiles for both descriptions of the exchange are nearly indistinguishable as exemplified in the insets of Fig. 2. The resulting radii decrease rapidly with applied magnetic field (cf. Fig. 2) consistent with experiments^{24} and micromagnetic models^{46}. Note that the range of metastable skyrmions stretches beyond B = 8 T for some cases as shown below.
For hcp stacking of Pd the radii are nearly the same using either J _{eff} or J _{DFT}. However, isolated skyrmions are metastable for much larger fields if we use the full set of DFT parameters. For fcc stacking the radii are larger than for hcp stacking and they decrease faster with field considering J _{eff} leading to a crossing of the two curves. The radii obtained from experiments on Pd/Fe/Ir(111)^{24} are very close to those from J _{DFT} for fcc stacking of Pd. Antiskyrmions can be stabilized only if frustrated exchange is present as in fccPd/Fe/Ir(111). Their radii are smaller than those of skyrmions in the same system. Below B = 3 T they become asymmetric, stretched objects and vanish for fields above B = 5.5 T.
Overall we find a very good agreement between simulations using the full set of exchange constants, the effective parameters and experimental data. We conclude that equilibrium properties of skyrmions in Pd/Fe/Ir(111) such as field dependent profiles or zero temperature phase diagrams can be accurately described by an effective (or micromagnetic) model for the exchange interactions.
Skyrmion stability
Now we turn to the collapse of isolated skyrmions into the ferromagnetic state. The minimum energy path for this process is obtained using the GNEB method (see methods). Figure 3 shows the energy barriers calculated for both Pd stackings at selected field values and both types of describing the exchange. The initial skyrmion state and the mechanism of collapse are independent of how the exchange interaction is treated. The skyrmion shrinks along the path until at the saddle point the inner spins turn into the film plane after which the topological charge vanishes (see Supplementary Figs 1 and 2) and the skyrmion can collapse to the ferromagnetic state (see Supplementary Movies 1 to 4). This mechanism has already been described based on the effective exchange model^{28,29,30,32,33}. However, the energy barriers are drastically enhanced if the frustrated exchange is explicitly treated in the simulations (see Supplementary Figs 1 and 2 for interaction resolved energy contributions along the reaction path). For the chosen magnetic field values we find an enhancement from about 34 to 59 meV for hcpPd/Fe/Ir(111) and from 71 to 143 meV for fccPd/Fe/Ir(111).
The spin structure at the saddle point is more extended if the full set of exchange constants is taken into account for fccPd/Fe/Ir(111) as shown in the insets of Fig. 4. The main contribution to the energy at the saddle point with respect to the FM state stems from the exchange interactions while all other interactions are small. The inner shells of the spin structure give the largest contribution since the angles between adjacent spins are largest. This energy is much enhanced if the full set of exchange constants is considered since using an effective exchange J _{eff} underestimates this term. The role of the frustrated exchange is apparent also from its energy contribution along the reaction path (see supplementary Fig. S1) which exhibits a large barrier – an effect which is absent for an effective exchange. For hcp stacking of the Pd layer a similar picture is obtained (see Supplementary Figs 2 and 3).
Frustrated exchange interactions allow the appearance of metastable antiskyrmions^{38},^{39,47,48}. We find nonvanishing energy barriers only in our simulations of fccPd/Fe/Ir(111) using the full set of DFT parameters. In this case the exchange interactions alone already lead to a shallow energy minimum in the dispersion of spin spirals. The mechanism of antiskyrmion collapse is similar to that for skyrmions with a shrinking of diameter and a saddle point configuration with inner spins pointing in the film plane (see insets of Fig. 5 and Supplementary Movie 5). We obtain a small energy barrier of about 15 meV at a magnetic field of B = 4 T as shown in Fig. 5 (see Supplementary Fig. 4 for interaction resolved energy contributions along the path).
Discussion
The energy barriers for skyrmion collapse exhibit a nonlinear dependence on the external magnetic field as shown in Fig. 6. For fccPd/Fe/Ir(111) the barriers above the critical field of \({B}_{{\rm{c}}}^{{\rm{eff}}}\mathrm{=3.6}\) T are of the same order if we use J _{eff} as given by Hagemeister et al.^{26} based on MonteCarlo simulations with an effective NN exchange. However, for all field values the barriers are drastically enhanced if the frustrated exchange in this system is treated properly. As a consequence isolated skyrmions are metastable up to much higher magnetic fields. Furthermore, antiskyrmions are only metastable if the full exchange interaction is taken into account with barriers on the order of 10 to 20 meV.
Even for hcpPd/Fe/Ir(111) which shows a ferromagnetic ground state at all field values there is a significant difference between the barriers for J _{eff} vs. J _{DFT}. Despite the very similar zero temperature phase diagram (cf. Fig. 1b,c) isolated skyrmions are metastable at much larger fields for J _{DFT}.
Within transitionstate theory^{49} the lifetime τ of skyrmions depends exponentially on the energy barrier ΔE, i.e. \(\tau ={\tau }_{0}\,\exp ({\rm{\Delta }}E/{k}_{{\rm{B}}}T)\) where T is the temperature and 1/τ _{0} is the attempt frequency. The enhancement of the lifetime due to taking exchange beyond NN into account for the barrier is \({\tau }_{{\rm{DFT}}}/{\tau }_{{\rm{eff}}}=\exp ([{\rm{\Delta }}{E}_{{\rm{D}}FT}{\rm{\Delta }}{E}_{{\rm{eff}}}]/{k}_{{\rm{B}}}T)\). For both hcp and fcc stacking of Pd there is a huge enhancement by one or three orders of magnitude at 100 K, respectively (see insets of Fig. 6). Even at room temperature there is a large increase of skyrmion lifetime.
The key observation is that at the saddle point which defines the height of the energy barrier the angles between adjacent spins are large and the energy of this configuration cannot be accurately described here by the effective NN exchange or micromagnetic model. From the energy dispersion of spin spirals (cf. Fig. 1a) this is obvious since the effective NN exchange can only describe E(q) well close to the ferromagnetic state for small canting angles between adjacent spins while it breaks down at large q corresponding to large NN angles. The same logic dictates that the NNexchange model should work better for the skyrmion annihilation at the boundary of a finitesize system since this process does not involve formation of singularities^{50,51}. More detailed analysis of the applicability of the effective NNexchange description of the skyrmion collapse at the boundary of a finite Pd/Fe/Ir(111) system as well as other itinerant electron magnets is, however, out of the scope of the present study and will be published elsewhere.
The effective exchange model even with parameters obtained from experiment^{24,26,27} is limited to describe skyrmion properties such as skyrmion profiles or zero temperature phase diagrams which rely on states close to the energy minimum. For all properties which require the treatment of configurations with large angles between adjacent spins such as skyrmion stability it is not sufficient. Therefore, properly treating exchange is also essential to simulate thermal fluctuations in order to obtain phase diagrams at finite temperature and phase transition temperatures^{52}.
Our work shows the importance of accounting for the neighbor resolved exchange interaction even in systems with a ferromagnetic ground state and that engineering exchange frustration^{45} is a promising route towards enhanced skyrmion stability. Although we focus here on a particular system, the conclusions we arrive at are rather general and should be valid in other itinerant electron magnets where frustrated, longrange exchange is a typical feature.
Methods
Firstprinciples calculations
We have explored the ultrathin film system Pd/Fe/Ir(111) from firstprinciples based on the fullpotential linearized augmented plane wave method as implemented in the FLEUR code (www.flapw.de). Within this approach we can calculate the total energy of noncollinear magnetic structures such as spin spirals^{40} including the DMI in first order perturbation theory with respect to the spinorbit coupling^{41}. We have used a twodimensional hexagonal p(1 × 1) unit cell within each layer and the in planelattice parameter of the Ir(111) surface as obtained from DFT in ref.^{34}. The relaxed interlayer distances were also taken from ref.^{34}. The magnetic properties were obtained within the local density approximation^{53} as previously^{10,16,34}. All calculations have been carried out with a plane wave cutoff of k _{max} = 4.3 a.u.^{−1}. The muffin tin radii were set to 2.23 a.u. for Fe and to 2.31 a.u. for Pd and Ir. We have used a 44 × 44 kpoint mesh in the full twodimensional Brillouin zone. In order to obtain quantitative parameters for the exchange interactions, we have converged the small energy minimum of the dispersion curve (Fig. 1(a)) with respect to the number of Ir substrate layers. With 5 layers of Ir substrate^{34} the energy minimum of fccPd/Fe/Ir(111) is E _{min} = −1.1 meV/Fe (without spinorbit coupling). Here, we have used asymmetric films with one layer Pd, one layer Fe and 15 layers of Ir substrate which leads to an energy minimum of E _{min} = −0.06 meV/Fe. To determine the exchange constants, we have used the energy dispersion curve of spin spirals E(q) for films with 15 Ir substrate layers for the spiral vector q in [0,1/4] and with 5 Ir layers for q in [1/4,2/3] (in units of 2π/a) along the \(\bar{{\rm{\Gamma }}}\bar{{\rm{K}}}\) direction. The DM interaction has been taken from the calculations with 5 Ir substrate layers^{34} as it did not change with substrate thickness.
Spin dynamics simulations
In order to calculate the energy differences between the FM, SkX and SS phases for the low temperature phase diagrams and to relax the isolated skyrmions and antiskyrmions, we used the LandauLifshitz equation of spin dynamics:
where α is the damping parameter, m _{i} is a single spin and H is the Hamiltonian given in Eq. (1). We have used damping parameters from α = 0.5 to α = 0.05 and time steps ranging from 0.05 fs to 0.1 fs to carefully relax the structures. The simulations are carried out on a timescale of 100 to 500 pico seconds and the equation of motion were solved with the semiimplicit integrator as proposed by Mentink et al.^{54}.
Geodesic nudged elastic band method
Minimum energy paths (MEPs) for skyrmion and antiskyrmion annihilation processes were identified using the geodesic nudged elastic band (GNEB) method^{28}. The GNEB method involves taking some initially generated path between the energy minima, and systematically bringing that to the MEP. A path is represented by a discrete chain of states, or ‘images’, of the system, where the first one corresponds to the skyrmion or antiskyrmion configuration while the last one corresponds to the ferromagnetic state. At each image, the effective field is calculated and its component along a local tangent to the path is substituted by an artificial spring force between the images which ensures uniform distribution of the images along the path. This modified effective field is substituted in Eq. (2) in the overdamped regime and the whole chain of images evolved till convergence. The final, relaxed position of images gives discrete representation of the MEP. The energy maximum along the MEP corresponds to the saddle point (SP) on the multidimensional energy surface of the system and defines the energy barrier separating the stable states. In order to determine the maximum energy accurately, the highest energy image can be treated separately during the iterative optimization and made to move uphill in energy along the path. The effective field on this climbing image (CI) is calculated by deactivating the spring force acting on it and inverting the parallel component of the gradient field. After the CIGNEB calculation has converged, the position of the CI coincides with the SP along the MEP and gives an accurate value of the SP energy.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files.
Change history
28 May 2019
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.
References
 1.
Bogdanov, A. & Yablonskii, D. A. Thermodynamically stable vortices in magnetically ordered crystals. The mixed state of magnets. Sov. Phys. JETP 68, 101–103 (1989).
 2.
Bogdanov, A. & Hubert, A. Thermodynamically stable magnetic vortex states in magnetic crystals. J. Mag. Mag. Mat. 138, 255–269 (1994).
 3.
Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915–919 (2009).
 4.
Yu, X. Z. et al. Realspace observation of a twodimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature 465, 901–904 (2010).
 5.
Seki, S., Yu, X. Z., Ishiwata, S. & Tokura, Y. Observation of skyrmions in a multiferroic material. Science 336, 198–201 (2012).
 6.
Moriya, T. Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. 120, 91–98 (1960).
 7.
Dzyaloshinskii, I. E. Thermodynamic theory of weak ferromagnetism in antiferromagnetic substances. Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 1259–1262 (1957).
 8.
Crépieux, A. & Lacroix, C. DzyaloshinskyMoriya interactions induced by symmetry breaking at a surface. J. Mag. Mag. Mat. 182, 341–349 (1998).
 9.
Bode, M. et al. Chiral magnetic order at surfaces driven by inversion asymmetry. Nature 447, 190–193 (2007).
 10.
Ferriani, P. et al. Atomicscale spin spiral with a unique rotational sense: Mn monolayer on W(001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 027201 (2008).
 11.
Heide, M., Bihlmayer, G. & Blügel, S. DzyaloshinskiiMoriya interaction accounting for the orientation of magnetic domains in ultrathin films: Fe/W(110). Phys. Rev. B 78, 140403 (2008).
 12.
Meckler, S. et al. Realspace observation of a rightrotating inhomogeneous cycloidal spin spiral by spinpolarized scanning tunneling microscopy in a triple axes vector magnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 157201 (2009).
 13.
Emori, S., Bauer, U., Ahn, S.M., Martinez, E. & Beach, G. S. D. Currentdriven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls. Nature materials 12, 611–616 (2013).
 14.
Ryu, K.S., Thomas, L., Yang, S.H. & Parkin, S. Chiral spin torque at magnetic domain walls. Nature Nanotech. 8, 527–533 (2013).
 15.
Thiaville, A., Rohart, S., Jué, É., Cros, V. & Fert, A. Dynamics of Dzyaloshinskii domain walls in ultrathin magnetic films. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 100, 57002 (2012).
 16.
Heinze, S. et al. Spontaneous atomicscale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. Nature Phys. 7, 713–718 (2011).
 17.
Romming, N. et al. Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions. Science 341, 636–639 (2013).
 18.
Baibich, M. N. et al. Giant magnetoresistance of (001)Fe/(001)Cr magnetic superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2472–2475 (1988).
 19.
Binasch, G., Grünberg, P., Saurenbach, F. & Zinn, W. Enhanced magnetoresistance in layered magnetic structures with antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange. Phys. Rev. B 39, 4828–4830 (1989).
 20.
Fert, A., Cros, V. & Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nature Nanotech. 8, 152–156 (2013).
 21.
Sampaio, J., Cros, V., Rohart, S., Thiaville, A. & Fert, A. Nucleation, stability and currentinduced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures. Nature Nanotech. 8, 839–844 (2013).
 22.
Kiselev, N., Bogdanov, A. N., Schäfer, R. & Rößler, U. K. Chiral skyrmions in thin magnetic films: new objects for magnetic storage technology? J. Phys. D 44, 392001 (2011).
 23.
Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nature Nanotech. 8, 899–911 (2013).
 24.
Romming, N., Kubetzka, A., Hanneken, C., von Bergmann, K. & Wiesendanger, R. Fielddependent size and shape of single magnetic skyrmions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 177203 (2015).
 25.
Hanneken, C. et al. Electrical detection of magnetic skyrmions by noncollinear magnetoresistance. Nature Nanotech. 10, 1039–1042 (2015).
 26.
Hagemeister, J., Romming, N., von Bergmann, K., Vedmedenko, E. Y. & Wiesendanger, R. Stability of single skyrmionic bits. Nature Comm. 6, 8455 (2015).
 27.
Leonov, A. O. et al. The properties of isolated chiral skyrmions in thin magnetic films. New J. Phys. 18, 065003 (2016).
 28.
Bessarab, P. F., Uzdin, V. M. & Jónsson, H. Method for finding mechanism and activation energy of magnetic transitions, applied to skyrmion and antivortex annihilation. Comp. Phys. Comm. 196, 335–347 (2015).
 29.
Rohart, S., Miltat, J. & Thiaville, A. Path to collapse for an isolated Néel skyrmion. Phys. Rev. B 93, 214412 (2016).
 30.
Lobanov, I. S., Jónsson, H. & Uzdin, V. M. Mechanism and activation energy of magnetic skyrmion annihilation obtained from minimum energy path calculations. Phys. Rev. B 94, 174418 (2016).
 31.
Uzdin, V. M., Potkina, M. N., Lobanov, I. S., Bessarab, P. F. & Jónsson, H. The effect of confinement and defects on the thermal stability of skyrmions. arXiv 1705.02930 (2017).
 32.
Bessarab, P. F. Comment on ‘Path to collapse for an isolated Néel skyrmion’. Phys. Rev. B 95, 136401 (2017).
 33.
Rohart, S., Miltat, J. & Thiaville, A. Reply to comment on ‘Path to collapse for an isolated Néel skyrmion’. Phys. Rev. B 95, 136402 (2017).
 34.
Dupé, B., Hoffmann, M., Paillard, C. & Heinze, S. Tailoring magnetic skyrmions in ultrathin transition metal films. Nature Comm. 5, 4030 (2014).
 35.
Simon, E., Palotás, K., Rózsa, L., Udvardi, L. & Szunyogh, L. Formation of magnetic skyrmions with tunable properties in PdFe bilayer deposited on Ir(111). Phys. Rev. B 90, 094410 (2014).
 36.
Oliveira, E. A. S., Silva, R. L., Silva, R. C. & Pereira, A. R. Effects of second neighbor interactions on skyrmion lattices in chiral magnets. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 205801 (2017).
 37.
Nandy, A. K., Kiselev, N. S. & Blügel, S. Interlayer exchange coupling: A general scheme turning chiral magnets into magnetic multilayers carrying atomicscale skyrmions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 177202 (2016).
 38.
Okubo, T., Chung, S. & Kawamure, H. Multipleq states and the skyrmion lattices of the triangularlattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet under magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017206 (2012).
 39.
Leonov, A. O. & Mostovoy, M. Multiply periodic states and isolated skyrmions in an anisotropic frustrated magnet. Nature Comm. 6, 8275 (2015).
 40.
Kurz, P., Förster, F., Nordström, L., Bihlmayer, G. & Blügel, S. Ab initio treatment of noncollinear magnets with the fullpotential linearized augmented plane wave method. Phys. Rev. B 69, 024415 (2004).
 41.
Heide, M., Bihlmayer, G. & Blügel, S. Describing DzyaloshinskiiMoriya spirals from first principles. Physica B: Condensed Matter 404, 2678–2683 (2009).
 42.
Zimmermann, B., Heide, M., Bihlmayer, G. & Blügel, S. Firstprinciples analysis of a homochiral cycloidal magnetic structure in a monolayer Cr on W(110). Phys. Rev. B 90, 115427 (2014).
 43.
Draaisma, H. J. G. & de Jonge, W. J. M. Surface and volume anisotropy from dipoledipole interactions in ultrathin ferromagnetic films. J. Appl. Phys. 64, 3610–3613 (1988).
 44.
Kubetzka, A., Hanneken, C., Wiesendanger, R. & von Bergmann, K. Impact of the skyrmion spin texture on magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. B 95, 104433 (2017).
 45.
Dupé, B., Bihlmayer, G., Böttcher, M., Blügel, S. & Heinze, S. Engineering skyrmions in transitionmetal multilayers for spintronics. Nature Comm. 7, 11779 (2016).
 46.
Bogdanov, A. N. & Hubert, A. The properties of isolated magnetic vortices. physica status solidi 186, 527–543 (1994).
 47.
Dupé, B., Kruse, C. N., Dornheim, T. & Heinze, S. How to reveal metastable skyrmionic spin structures by spinpolarized scanning tunneling microscopy. New J. Phys. 18, 055015 (2016).
 48.
Rózsa, L. et al. Formation and stability of metastable skyrmionic spin structures with various topologies in an ultrathin film. Phys. Rev. B 95, 094423 (2017).
 49.
Bessarab, P. F., Uzdin, V. M. & Jónsson, H. Harmonic transitionstate theory of thermal spin transitions. Phys. Rev. B 85, 184409 (2012).
 50.
Stosic, D., Mulkers, J., Waeyenberge, B. V., Ludermir, T. B. & Milośević, M. V. Paths to collapse for isolated skyrmions in fewmonolayer ferromagnetic films. Phys. Rev. B 95, 214418 (2017).
 51.
CortésOrtuno, D. et al. Thermal stability and topological protection of skyrmions in nanotracks. Sci. Rep. 7, 4060 (2017).
 52.
Rózsa, L., Simon, E., Palotás, K., Udvardi, L. & Szunyogh, L. Complex magnetic phase diagram and skyrmion lifetime in an ultrathin film from atomistic simulations. Phys. Rev. B 93, 024417 (2016).
 53.
Vosko, S. H., Wilk, L. & Nusair, M. Accurate spindependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Canadian Journal of Physics 58, 1200–1211 (1980).
 54.
Mentink, J. H., Tretyakov, M. V., Fasolino, A., Katsnelson, M. I. & Rasing, T. Stable and fast semiimplicit integration of the stochastic LandauLifshitz equation. J. Phys. C 22, 176001 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge computing time at the supercomputer of the NorthGerman Supercomputing Alliance (HLRN). This project has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 665095 (FETOpen project MAGicSky). P.F.B. acknowledges support from the Icelandic Research Fund (Grant No. 163048052) and the megagrant of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (grant no. 14.Y26.31.0015). B.D. thanks the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for funding within the project DU1489/21. A.D. acknowledges financial support from Swedish escience Research Centre (SeRC), Vetenskapsrådet (grant numbers VR 201504608 and VR 201605980), and Swedish Energy Agency (grant number STEM P401471). Some of the computations were performed on resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at the National Supercomputer Center (NSC), Linköping University, the PDC Centre for High Performance Computing (PDCHPC), KTH, and the High Performance Computing Center North (HPC2N), Umeå University.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
S.v.M. performed the spin dynamics simulations. S.v.M. and P.F.B. performed the GNEB calculations. B.D. performed the firstprinciples calculations. B.D., P.F.B., A.D., and S.H. conceived the project. S.v.M. and S.H. wrote the manuscript. All authors analyzed and discussed the data and contributed to the writing of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
von Malottki, S., Dupé, B., Bessarab, P.F. et al. Enhanced skyrmion stability due to exchange frustration. Sci Rep 7, 12299 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4159801712525x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Experimental identification of two distinct skyrmion collapse mechanisms
Nature Physics (2021)

Dense skyrmion crystal stabilized through interfacial exchange coupling: Role of inplane anisotropy
Frontiers of Physics (2021)

Toward roomtemperature nanoscale skyrmions in ultrathin films
npj Computational Materials (2020)

Role of higherorder exchange interactions for skyrmion stability
Nature Communications (2020)

Isolated zero field sub10 nm skyrmions in ultrathin Co films
Nature Communications (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.