Article | Open

Pokémon GO and psychological distress, physical complaints, and work performance among adult workers: a retrospective cohort study

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 10758 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11176-2
  • Download Citation
Published online:


The effects of Pokémon GO, a new mobile game application which utilizes augmented reality, on risky behavior and health have already been discussed in anecdotal evidence. However, there have been no studies about its effects on mental health. This study investigated the relationships between Pokémon GO and psychological distress from an existing workers’ cohort in Japan. Online surveys were conducted to 3,915 full-time workers, at baseline (Nov 26, 2015–Feb 18, 2016) and at follow-up (Dec 1–4, 2016), using a self-report questionnaire. Pokémon GO players were defined as participants who had played Pokémon GO for one month or longer. Psychological distress was measured using validated scales. Of the completers, 246 (9.7%) had continued to play Pokémon GO. They were significantly younger than non-players. From the results of the general linear modeling, improvement in psychological distress was significantly greater among Pokémon GO players than among non-players (p = 0.025). Cohen’s d for the difference in psychological distress was −0.20 (95% CI, −0.33, −0.07). Pokémon GO may be effective for improving psychological distress among workers. Although its effect size is small, the game could have positive effects on the mental health of the adult working population.


Pokémon GO is a mobile application game released by Niantic, Inc. on July 2016, and was explosively downloaded (over 500 million) in just 8 weeks1, 2. Pokémon GO utilizes geographical data to create an augmented reality and enable players to search for, catch, and train Pokémon characters and obtain objects as if they were doing it in the real world. In addition, players can get their hands on “Pokémon eggs” in the game, and have to walk a certain distance to hatch them. Thus, in contrast to conservative video games, Pokémon GO requires players to go out of their homes or workplaces and move around to progress in the game.

Because of the novelty of this game’s concept, the negative and positive effects of Pokémon GO have been actively discussed in news and case reports, anecdotal evidence, and partially, in scientific studies. The potential negative effects of Pokémon GO could be traffic accidents or injury risks3,4,5,6; trespassing, abduction, and violence7; mosquito-borne diseases8; and sleep problems9. For instance, Wagner-Greene et al9. conducted a cross-sectional survey among 662 adult Pokémon GO players; their findings indicated that more than a quarter of the players reported that they were likely to play Pokémon GO while driving and biking and they would also sacrifice sleep to play the game. Conversely, the potential merits of playing Pokémon GO have also been suggested, especially those on promoting physical activity10,11,12,13,14. In addition, Pokémon GO may help people with autism, depression, and social withdrawal (hikikomori) to move out of their home and thus, improve mental health15,16,17,18,19. These positive effects could be mediated by improved socialization20, 21, as well as by the increase in physical activity22,23,24. The technology of augmented reality offers data sharing and multi-user real-time interaction in the real world, which can satisfy the aspects of the sense of community: membership, influence, and integration and need fulfillment21. Moreover, since interventions with game-like elements to promote health can contribute to engaging individuals with various target populations and enhance their adherence to programs25, 26, Pokémon GO can help reach out to not only the motivated population, but also other populations (e.g., people not interested in health, people suffering from mental problems and having difficulties in accessing healthcare), regardless of their age or sex13.

However, most reports on the benefits of Pokémon GO on mental health were from case reports or anecdotal evidence15,16,17,18,19, and there is still no scientific evidence on this. In this study, we investigated the association between Pokémon GO and improved psychological distress, retrospectively, from an existing workers’ cohort in Japan. Mental health problems among workers are as common as community population27, 28, that are associated with poor quality of life and work performance29, 30. This is the first scientific study to report the association between playing Pokémon GO and mental health and can be useful for understanding the impact of the new smartphone game application on public health. We hypothesized that Pokémon GO would have a negative relationship with psychological distress.


Study design and setting

This study was a retrospective cohort study based on an online survey by an Internet survey company (Macromill, Inc.31). The company has access to more than 2,000,000 registered members of all prefectures in Japan. These registered members have diverse characteristics in terms of sex and age. Approximately half of them were women (56.3%), and their age ranged from 12 years to over 60 years. Regarding occupation, more than half (67.4%) of the members were workers (public servants [3.5%], employers [1.8%], workers employed by private companies [40.1%], freelancers [6.6%], part-time workers [15.4%]). Participants who met the eligibility criteria as described below were randomly sampled from the member pool and completed an online self-report questionnaire developed by the authors at baseline (Nov 26, 2015–Feb 18, 2016) and at follow-up (Dec 1–4, 2016). Pokémon GO was released on July 22, 2016 in Japan1, between the baseline and follow-up survey. This study protocol was received ethical approved by the research ethics committee of the Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan (No. 10856). The ethics committee confirmed that all methods in this study performed in accordance with the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Human Research Involving Human Subjects, Japan32. We obtained informed consent from all participants via questionnaire instructions on the website. The instructions assured protection of personal information and explained that data would be anonymized. Any identifying information (participants’ name, and other identifiers that could lead to identification of a participant) was removed when we got the data through the Internet survey company, and no other images/videos were not obtained from the participants. Our study has been reported according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines33.


At baseline, a total of 3,915 workers who had registered with the Internet survey company were recruited and completed the survey in the order of arrival. The recruitment of participants was stratified by sex (males, females) and age (in years; 18–29, 30–39, 40–49, and 50 or more) among randomly sampled workers of the registered members. Participant inclusion criteria were (a) workers who lived in Japan; (b) workers employed by private companies, public servants, or freelancers; and (c) full-time workers. Participant exclusion criteria were (a) those not employed and (b) employed part-time workers. Based on these criteria, the Internet survey company randomly recruited workers from their potential pool of participants via e-mail and their own website. If the eligible workers agreed to the terms and conditions of the online survey, they could access the self-report questionnaire. Since the Internet survey company ceased recruitment once the target number of respondents had been reached, the response rate could not be determined. After about a year, the company recruited the workers to complete the baseline survey again via e-mail. The follow-up survey was managed by coordination staffs from the Internet survey company, sending several reminders to the participants who had not responded when first contacted. Participating workers were awarded approximately 80 “Macromill points” as a reward for participation in each survey, which could be used for cashing out and shopping (1 point was equivalent to JPY1).

Variables and measurements

All variables were measured using the online self-report questionnaire that developed by the authors. The eligible workers who agreed to participate were instructed to log in to the portal and complete the online questionnaire. In the follow-up survey, we measured whether workers had played Pokémon GO. Primary (i.e., psychological distress) and secondary outcomes (i.e., physical complaints and work performance), covariates, and other demographic variables were measured at baseline and follow-up.

Pokémon GO players

The exposure variable was measured with the dichotomous question, “During the past 1 year, have you continued to play Pokémon GO, which is a smartphone game app, for 1 month or longer”? Workers who answered “yes” to this question were considered Pokémon GO players.

Psychological distress

Psychological distress was measured using the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ)34. It includes 18 items and 5 subscales: vigor (three items; e.g., “I have been very active”), irritation (three items; e.g., “I have felt angry”), fatigue (three items; e.g., “I have felt extremely tired”), anxiety (three items; e.g., “I have felt tense”), and depression (six items; “I have felt depressed”). All items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1: hardly; 4: almost). Since vigor measured a positive aspect of psychological distress, scores of vigor were reverse-coded when calculating the total scores. Higher scores indicated higher psychological distress. This scale has been widely used in Japan to assess responses to stress and has demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and predictive validity for the onset of depression35, 36.

Physical complaints

Physical complaints were also measured using the BJSQ34, including 11 items and various types of self-reported complaints in the past 1 month: dizziness, arthralgia, headache, neck and shoulder pain, backache, eyestrain, aspiration, malfunction of stomach, loss of appetite, constipation and diarrhea, and insomnia (e.g., “I feel dizzy”). All items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1: hardly; 4: almost). Higher scores indicate higher physical complaints.

Work performance

Work performance was assessed using an item from the validated scale, the Japanese short version of the WHO Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (WHO-HPQ)37, 38. The item rated an individual’s overall job performance for the past 1 month on a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 being the worst job performance and 10 being the best. According to a scoring rule of WHO-HPQ39, the ratings were multiplied by 10 to calculate work performance.

Covariates and other demographic variables

As confounders, we measured sex, age, smoking habits (never, smoked previously but currently not smoking, and currently smoking), and drinking habits (never, rarely, sometimes, and daily drinking). Using the BJSQ, job stressors were also measured as confounders at the workplace34. Job stressors contained job demands (three items; e.g., “I have an extremely large amount of work to do”), job control (three items; e.g., “I can work at my own pace”), social support from supervisors (three items; e.g., “How freely can you talk with supervisors”?), and social support from colleagues (three items; e.g., “How reliable are colleagues when you are troubled”?). All items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale, and higher scores indicate higher job demands, job control, and social support from supervisors and colleagues. Marital status, educational status, employment status, job type, employment shift status, and household income were also measured as other demographic variables.


Descriptive statistics and Cronbach’s alphas for multi-item continuous scales (i.e., psychological distress, physical complaints, and job stressors) were calculated for each group. For the main analysis, general linear modeling for a two-way factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed. We estimated the fixed effects of group (Pokémon GO player/non-player), time (baseline/follow-up), and interaction (group*time) on psychological distress, physical complaints, and work performance. Sex, age, smoking habit, drinking habit, and job stressors at baseline were entered as covariates. Continuous covariates (i.e., age and job stressors) were mean-centered, and other covariates were transformed into dummy variables: sex (male [reference group]), smoking habits (never/previously smoking, but not currently [reference group]), and drinking habits (not/rarely [reference group]). The restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML) was used for the estimation of parameters, and the MIXED model command of the PASW statistics version 18 (IBM SPSS software)40 was used for analyses. We calculated Cohen’s d41 as effect sizes for each outcome, using descriptive means of change from baseline to follow-up and standard deviations between two groups. The effect size would be considered large, medium, and small if Cohen’s d had been 0.80, 0.50, and 0.20, respectively41. Since the study employed an online-based survey, there were no missing values for any of the variables or items. Further, since the exposure variable was measured after the baseline survey, attrition at follow-up could not be addressed. We only analyzed completed follow-up surveys.


Characteristics of participants

Of the total of 3,915 workers at baseline, 2,599 workers completed the follow-up survey after Pokémon GO was released (valid follow-up rate = 66.4%). Due to employing the Internet survey via e-mail, reasons for no response (N = 1,316) were unknown to us. Sixty-nine of these participants had lost their jobs and were thus converted to non-workers and excluded from the analyses. Thus, a total of 2,530 workers (64.6%) were included in the analyses. Since the Internet-based survey required the participants to complete all the items, there were no missing values in any of the variables or items.

Among those who completed the follow-up survey, 246 (9.7%) had continued to play Pokémon GO for 1 month or longer (Table 1). These Pokémon GO players were significantly younger (M = 37.09 ± 10.85) than non-players (M = 42.66 ± 10.65). The other participant characteristics did not significantly differ between groups. Most participants were full-time (84.9%) and day-time shift (87.5%) workers.

Table 1: Characteristics of the participants at baseline (N = 2,530).

Effects of playing Pokémon GO on outcomes

Table 2 shows the descriptive mean scores and Cronbach’s alphas for job stressors and outcomes. Cronbach’s alphas ranged from 0.72 to 0.94 in each survey, indicating enough internal consistency among all continuous variables. From the results of general linear modeling (Table 3), the interaction effect of group by time was significant on psychological distress (p = 0.025). Improvement of psychological distress was significantly greater among Pokémon GO players than among non-players. Improvements in physical complaints (p = 0.447) and work performance (p = 0.377) were not statistically significant. Although physical complaints among Pokémon GO players lessened to a slightly greater extent than among non-players, the difference was not significant. On the other hand, work performance decreased to a slightly greater extent, although not significantly so, among Pokémon GO players. Cohen’s d values of psychological distress, physical complaints, and work performance were −0.20, −0.07, and −0.07, respectively.

Table 2: Scores of job stressors, psychological distress, physical complaints, and work performance of the participants between two groups
Table 3: Interaction effects of playing Pokémon GO by time on psychological distress, physical complaints, and work performance


The results supported our primary hypotheses, indicating significantly better improvement of psychological distress among Pokémon GO players compared to non-players. The quantitative findings are the first scientific suggestion for the effects of Pokémon GO, the new mobile application game utilizing augmented reality, on mental health among workers. The observed effect size for a decrease in psychological distress was small (d = −0.20). Pokémon GO might not have a visible impact on psychological distress on an individual-basis, but it could have a critical impact on public health, affecting the whole population, because of its tremendous popularity. Previous anecdotal evidence concerning its health benefits or epidemiological studies on the game’s impact on physical activity were limited to younger populations (e.g., children, adolescents, or persons 35 years or younger)14, 15. However, the present study suggests that working population may also enjoy the benefits of playing Pokémon GO, such as improved mental health. Our findings are in line with a previous study13 which reported that Pokémon GO could have health benefits for participants with different demographic characteristics (e.g., age, sex) because the negative association between playing Pokémon GO, and psychological distress remained after adjustment (sex, age, smoking and drinking habits, and job stressors). Therefore, playing games utilizing the technology of augmented reality could be recommended among workers with various characteristics.

How Pokémon GO and the technology of augmented reality improve psychological distress was not the focus of the present study, but this can be partially explained by the increased physical activity18 and socialization9, 21 among players. Pokémon GO and other social exergames (games that require physical activity to play)41 utilizing augmented reality entails Global Positioning System (GPS) that enables players to get real-time geographic feedback and be impressed by multiple players playing the game in the real world20. Therefore, they might become physically active, albeit unconsciously. In addition, this technology is installed in mobile applications, which is easy to play, has minimum involvement, and only requires going out with a small digital device. Moreover, in contrast to conservative video games, the following are the simple, required operations for playing these social exergames: tapping, swiping, and just moving. Therefore, respondents might be able to play these social exergames briefly to refresh and cope with their daily psychological distress. Other mechanisms, like social and multiplayer effects of the technology of augmented reality, may also influence physical and mental health42. Factors that possibly influence adherence to playing Pokémon GO or the effects of Pokémon GO on psychological distress (e.g., personal characters, stressful events not measured in the study, social interaction, and especially, physical activity) should be discussed in future studies, and a randomized controlled trial should be conducted for stronger evidence.

We did not observe significant improvement on physical complaints or work performance among Pokémon GO players. The effect of playing Pokémon GO could be limited to psychological distress only. Possible reasons for these results might be mental- and non-work-specific components of Pokémon GO: fun, pleasure, or entertainment. The previous meta-analysis indicated that game-based digital interventions could improve mental health, and suggested that entertainment-based games might be used for relaxation and pleasure, rather than changing behavioral or cognitive skills43. Therefore, Pokémon GO might be more strongly associated with psychological and emotional aspects of private lives than physical aspects and work among players.

Our study had several limitations. First, since we investigated the association retrospectively, a causal relationship cannot be inferred. Since participants were not exposed to Pokémon GO at baseline, we could not precisely capture the changes in outcomes by exposure. Second, we could only investigate the association between outcomes and playing Pokémon GO in the short term (1 month or longer). Previous studies13, 14 have indicated that an increase in physical activity was no longer observable after several months. The association in the long term could not be determined. Third, participants were not a random sample of workers but worked as monitors for the Internet survey company. Therefore, we cannot generalize our findings to all Japanese workers. Fourth, we could not calculate the valid response rate at baseline and could not determine reasons for non-participation at follow-up. In addition, the completion rate for the survey was not very high (66.4%). These limitations might have caused selection bias, overestimation of the associations between Pokémon GO and outcomes. Fifth, all the measurements were self-reported and therefore, may have caused information bias and measurement errors. The follow-up survey was conducted in December 2016, five months after the release of Pokémon GO. Thus, measurement of exposure might be distorted by recall bias. Finally, we should also consider regression to the mean, in view of higher baseline scores on psychological distress among Pokémon GO players, compared to non-players.

In conclusion, Pokémon GO may be effective for improving psychological distress among workers. Although its effect size was small, it could have a critical public health impact on the mental health of the adult working population. Further studies are needed to investigate the causal relationship, relationships to physical activity and social behaviors, and mechanisms to improve the mental health.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Niantic, Inc. (Date of access: 26/05/2017) (2017).

  2. 2.

    Niantic, I. & Pokemon, C., Ltd. The smartphone application game “Pokémon GO”: report on the number of downloads. (Date of access: 26/05/2017) (2016).

  3. 3.

    Ayers, J. W. et al. Pokémon GO–a new distraction for drivers and pedestrians. JAMA Intern Med. 176, 1865–1866 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Raj, M. A., Karlin, A. & Backstrom, Z. K. Pokémon GO: imaginary creatures, tangible risks. Clin Pediatr (Philla). 55, 1195–1196 (2016).

  5. 5.

    Joseph, B. & Armstrong, D. G. Potential perils of peri- Pokémon perambulation: the dark reality of augmented reality? Oxf Med Case Reports. 2016, omw080, ecollection 2016 (2016).

  6. 6.

    Sharma, P. & Vassiliou, V. Pokémon GO: cardiovascular benefit or injury risk? Oxf Med Case Reports. 2016, omw085, Ecollection 2016 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Serino, M., Cordrey, K., McLaughlin, L. & Milanail, R. L. Pokémon GO and augmented virtual reality games: a cautionary commentary for parents and pediatricians. Curr Opin Pediatr. 28, 673–677, doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000409 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Oidtman, R. J. et al. Pokémon GO and exposure to mosquito-borne diseases: how to not to catch’em all. PLos Curr. 8, doi:10.1371/currents.outbreaks.2d885b05c7e06a9f72e4656d56b043cd. (2016).

  9. 9.

    Wagner-Greene, V. R. et al. Pokémon GO: healthy or harmful? Am J Public Health. 107, 35–36 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Nigg, C. R., Mateo, D. J. & An, J. Pokémon GO may increase physical activity and decrease sedentary behaviors. Am J Public Health. 107, 37–38 (2017).

  11. 11.

    LeBlanc, A. G. & Chaput, J. P. Pokémon GO: a game changer for the physical inactivity crisis? Prev Med. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.012 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Baranowki, T. Pokémon GO, go, go, gone? Games Health J, doi:10.1089/g4h.2016.01055.tbp (2016).

  13. 13.

    Althoff, T. & White, R. W. Horvits E. Influence of Pokémon GO on physical activity: study and implications. J Med Internet Res. 18, e315 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Howe, K. B. et al. Gotta catch’em all! Pokémon GO and physical activity among young adults: difference in differences study. BMJ. 355, i6270, doi:10.1136/bmj.i6270 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Kato, T. A. et al. Can Pokémon GO rescue shut-ins (hikikomori) from their social world? Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 71, 75–76, doi:10.1111/pcn.12481 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Tateno, M., Skokauskas, N., Kato, T. A., Teo, A. R. & Guerrero, A. P. New game software (Pokémon GO) may help youth with severe social withdrawal, hikikomori. Psychiatry Res. 246, 848–849, doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.038 (2016).

  17. 17.

    McCartney, M. Margaret McCartney: game on for Pokémon GO. BMJ. 354, i4306, doi:10.1136/bmj.i4306 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Grohol, J. M. Pokemon Go reportedly helping people’s mental health, depression. (Date of access: 26/05/2017) (2016).

  19. 19.

    BBC NEWS. Pokemon Go helps autistic boy Adam leave house. (Date of access: 26/05/2017) (2016).

  20. 20.

    Kamel Boulos, M. N. et al. From urban planning and emergency training to Pokémon Go: applications of virtual reality GIS (VRGIS) and augmented reality GIS (ARGIS) in personal, public and environmental health. Int J Health Geogr. 16, 7, doi:10.1186/s12942-017-0081-0 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Townley, G. Independent diversities: reflections on the community-diversity dialectic. Am J Community Psycol. doi:10.1002/ajcp.12133 (2017).

  22. 22.

    Jeffason, T., Lindwall, M. & Archer, T. Physical exercise intervention in depressive disorders: meta-analysis and systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 24, 259–272, doi:10.1111/sms.12050 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Kvam, S. et al. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 202, 67–86, doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.063 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Mammen, G. & Faulkner, G. Physical activity and the prevention of depression. Am J Prev Med. 45, 649–657, doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.001 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Brigham, T. J. An introduction to gamification: adding game elements for engagement. Med Ref Serv Q. 34, 471–480, doi:10.1080/02763869.2015.1082385 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Brown, M. et al. Gamification and adherence to web-based mental health interventions: a systematic review. JMIR Ment Health. 3, e39, doi:10.2196/mental.5710 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Wulsin, L. et al. Prevalence rates for depression by industry: a claims database analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 49, 1805–1821 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Kessler, R. C., Merikangas, K. R. & Wang, P. S. The prevalence and correlates of workplace depression in the national comorbidity survey replication. J Occup Environ Med. 50, 381–390 (2008).

  29. 29.

    Greenberg, P. E. et al. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). J Clin Psychiatry. 76, 155–162 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Kessler, R. C. The costs of depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 35, 1–14 (2012).

  31. 31.

    Macromill, I. Corporate profile. (Date of access: 26/05/2017) (2016).

  32. 32.

    The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects. (Date of access: 01/06/2017) (2015).

  33. 33.

    Vandenbroucke, J. P. et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLos Med. 4, e297 (2007).

  34. 34.

    Shimomitsu, T. et al. Final development of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire mainly used for assessment of the individuals. In The Ministry of Labor Sponsored Grant for the Prevention of Work- Related Illness (ed. Kato M. et al.) 126–164. (Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, 2000).

  35. 35.

    Wada, K. et al. Relationship between the onset of depression and stress response measured by the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire among Japanese employees: a cohort study. PLoS One. 8, e56319, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056319 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Inoue, A. et al. Development of a short questionnaire to measure an extended set of job demands, job resources, and positive health outcomes: the new Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. Ind Health. 52, 175–189 (2014).

  37. 37.

    Kessler, R. C. et al. The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). J Occup Environ Med. 45, 156–174 (2003).

  38. 38.

    World Health Organization. WHO Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (short form) Japanese edition. (Date of access: 26/05/2017) (2013).

  39. 39.

    Kessler, R. et al. World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire: HPQ scoring documents: HPQ short form (Absenteeism and Presenteeism Questions and Scoring Rules). (Date of access: 26/05/2017) (2007).

  40. 40.

    SPSS Inc. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, United States of America. URL (2009).

  41. 41.

    Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd edition. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Hillsdale, NJ. (1988).

  42. 42.

    Kamel Boulos, M. N. & Yang, S. P. Exergames for health and fitness: the roles of GPS and geosocial apps. Int J Health Geogr. 12, 18, doi:10.1186/1476-072X-12-18 (2013).

  43. 43.

    Li, J., Theng, Y. K. & Foo, S. Game-based digital interventions for depression therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 17, 519–527, doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0481 (2014).

Download references


The present study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Research in a Proposed Research Area) 2016–2020 (No. 16H06398) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, and The Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant 2015–2017 (H27-Rodo-Ippan-004) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The corresponding author (N.K.) is responsible for submitting a competing financial interests statement on behalf of all authors of the paper.

Author information


  1. Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan

    • Kazuhiro Watanabe
    • , Norito Kawakami
    • , Kotaro Imamura
    •  & Yumi Asai
  2. The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, 102-0083, Japan

    • Kazuhiro Watanabe
  3. Department of Public Health, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan

    • Akiomi Inoue
    •  & Akizumi Tsutsumi
  4. Center for Human and Social Sciences, Kitasato University College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan

    • Akihito Shimazu
  5. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan, Kanagawa, 214-8585, Japan

    • Toru Yoshikawa
  6. Department of Mental Health, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan

    • Hisanori Hiro
  7. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, 160-8402, Japan

    • Yuko Odagiri
  8. Department of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross College of Nursing, Tokyo, 150-0012, Japan

    • Etsuko Yoshikawa


  1. Search for Kazuhiro Watanabe in:

  2. Search for Norito Kawakami in:

  3. Search for Kotaro Imamura in:

  4. Search for Akiomi Inoue in:

  5. Search for Akihito Shimazu in:

  6. Search for Toru Yoshikawa in:

  7. Search for Hisanori Hiro in:

  8. Search for Yumi Asai in:

  9. Search for Yuko Odagiri in:

  10. Search for Etsuko Yoshikawa in:

  11. Search for Akizumi Tsutsumi in:


K.W. analyzed the results and drafted the article. N.K., K.I., A.I., A.S., T.Y., H.H., Y.A., Y.O., E.Y., and A.T. made substantial contributions to the conception and design, interpretation of data, revising the article critically for important intellectual content, and the final approval of the version to be published.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norito Kawakami.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit