Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Self-induction system for cellulase production by cellobiose produced from glucose in Rhizopus stolonifer


Cellulolytic fungi have evolved a sophisticated genetic regulatory network of cellulase synthesis to adapt to the natural environment. Even in the absence of lignocellulose, it still secretes low levels of “constitutive” cellulase for standby application. However, the mechanisms of this constitutive expression remain incompletely understood. Here we identified a cellobiose synthetase (CBS) from Rhizopus stolonifer, which has the capacity to catalyse the synthesis of cellobiose from uridine diphosphate glucose (UDPG). Through the construction of R. stolonifer Δcbs strain, we found that CBS plays a key role in the synthesis of cellulase. Further analysis of cellulase synthesis under glucose culture reveals that the cellobiose-responsive regulator CLR1 was activated by CBS-synthesized cellobiose, thereby promoting the expression of CLR2 and finally opening the transcription of cellulase genes. Our results suggest that R. stolonifer can be induced by self-synthesized cellobiose to produce cellulase, which can be used to reconstruct the expression regulation network to achieve rapid production of cellulase using simple carbon source. Based on our data, the “constitutive expression” of cellulase actually derives from the induction of cellobiose that synthesized by CBS from carbohydrate metabolites, which updates our knowledge of cellulase, and provides a novel insight into the regulation of cellulase synthesis.


Cellulase is generally divided into inducible and constitutive enzymes1. As previously reported, numerous induced hypotheses of cellulase that based on cellulosic substrates have been proposed2,3,4. The most recognized hypothesis is that low-level constitutive cellulase accomplishes the initial degradation of cellulose releasing the soluble oligosaccharides to induce the expression of cellulase5,6,7. However, there is no hypothesis about the genetics of cellulase constitutive expression, although the inducing abilities of various non-cellulosic substrates including glucose, lactose, and starch hydrolysate for cellulase production have been confirmed8,9,10. Furthermore, the acid-hydrolysed starch that mainly composed of glucose, dextrin, and other oligosaccharides, could be used as the main carbon source for efficient industrial production of cellulase from cellulolytic fungi. Therefore, confirming the synthesis mechanism of cellulase under the cultivation of non-cellulosic substrates is critical to subsequent regulation of production.

It has been reported that some disaccharides such as cellobiose, sophorose, and lactose have a strong ability to induce the expression of cellulase11,12,13,14. Moreover, sophorose has been found to be one of the converted products from cellobiose that trans glycosylated by β-glucosidase (BG)15. Cellobiose is recognized as a natural inducer for cellulase production16. A low-concentration of cellobiose can effectively induce the expression of cellulase in Trichoderma reesei 9, 17. Interestingly, we have detected a low-level cellobiose in vivo by growing R. stolonifer on glucose substrate (Supplementary Fig. 1). Therefore, we assume that there may be an enzyme which can synthesize cellobiose with glucose or its intermediate metabolites as precursors, which suggests that cellulase could be induced by the self-synthetic cellobiose.

Here we identified a glycosyltransferase CBS which may mainly account for catalysing the synthesis of cellobiose that participated in the induction of cellulase in R. stolonifer. To evaluate the role of CBS, we constructed R. stolonifer Δcbs and detected both transcription and expression levels of cellulase. The apparent differences between the parent and mutant strains suggested that CBS is one of the key proteins to control of cellulase synthesis. Based on the identification and characterization of CBS, we provided a new induction model which can describe the production pathway of cellulase using the non-cellulosic substrates.


Identification of CBS from R. stolonifer

As reported in other cellulolytic fungi, cellobiose can effectively induce the secretion of cellulase in R. stolonifer (Supplementary Fig. 2). Our previous studies suggested that a cellobiose at low concentration level can be detected in vivo by growing R. stolonifer on glucose substrate (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Cellobiose production in vivo was then confirmed using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) comparing to a chemical standard (Supplementary Fig. 1b,c). Furthermore, the accumulation of cellobiose showed a correlation with the cellulase induction (Supplementary Fig. 1d). Since a low-level cellobiose was detected in vivo, there should be a system to synthesize cellobiose in R. stolonifer. Here, we chose cellulose synthase as a reference for the further study because of its capacity to catalyse the synthesis of cellulose in vivo by utilizing active glucose UDPG as glycosyl donors under glucose cultivation conditions. We hypothesized that the key catalytic structure of the “cellobiose synthase” should be similar to that of the cellulose synthetase, for which we compared the published cellulose synthase genes and designed the probe to capture the target gene from R. stolonifer. Fragment of the gene encoding conserved active centre of cellulose synthase (CESA domain) was used as a probe to extract target gene. The clone, cbsh (GenBank No. KT957546), resembles the fragment encoding CESA. Flanking sequences of cbsh were amplified by the TAIL-PCR. Finally, a novel gene, cbs (GenBank No. KT957545) was obtained and analysed by a multiple alignments of BLAST and ClustalW2. The results indicated that protein encoded by cbs belongs to glycosyltransferase with a partial characteristic sequence of BglB (Supplementary Fig. 3). The alignments of ClustalW2 showed that CBS contains an analogous CESA catalytic domain which was similar to the cellulose synthetase (GenBank No. XP_001390453) in Aspergillus niger. The percent identity calculated by MegAlign between CBS and this cellulose synthetase is 47.8%.

To determine the function of CBS, the cbs gene within pET28a was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3). Positive clones were selected and cultured in a liquid LB medium with addition of glucose. Composition of the zymotic fluid was analysed by HPLC. The results indicated the presence of cellobiose, which suggested that the recombinant of E. coli was capable of synthesizing cellobiose (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 4). By the purification process using Nickel column, the target CBS with molecular weight of 56 kDa was obtained (Fig. 2a).

Figure 1
figure 1

HPLC profiles of the fermentation extracts of E. coli BL21 (pET28a-cbs) and the components of CBS mixture. STD: 1% (m/V) glucose and 1% cellobiose; I: E. coli BL21 (pET28a); II: E. coli BL21 (pET28a-cbs); III: negative control of E. coli BL21 (pET28a-cbs) without induced; IV–VI: mixture of CBS (100 μg), UDPG (20 mg), and 0.5 mM ATP reacted at 30 °C for 30 min (IV), 1 h (V), and 1 day (VI); VII: negative control of CBS mixture without ATP.

Figure 2
figure 2

Characterization of CBS in vitro. (a) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified CBS (56 kDa). (b) Thin layer chromatography (TLC) results of the enzymatic reaction mixture of CBS. Line 1: 1% (m/V) cellobiose; Line 2, 6: 1% cellobiose and 1% sophorose; Line 3–5: mixture of CBS, UDPG, and ATP reacted at 30 °C for 1 day; Line 7: reaction mixture of cellobiose, ATP, and CBS; Line 8: negative control of cellobiose mixture with an inactivated CBS. (c) Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) results of the disaccharide synthesized by CBS.

Characterization of CBS in vitro

As one of the glycosyltransferases, CBS requires active nucleoside diphosphate sugars as glycosyl donors to catalyse the synthesis of cellobiose18, 19. So far, three nucleoside diphosphate glucoses including ADPG, UDPG and GDPG have been found20. The preferred glycosyl donor for synthesis of β-1,4-glucan in microorganism is UDPG21, 22. In order to identify the function of CBS, purified protein was tested in vitro at the simulating condition. The results showed that CBS has the ability to form a disaccharide by UDPG in the presence of ATP (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 4). However, this ability cannot be seen when the glucose was employed as substrate. This indicated that CBS may only act on the activated glucose in process needing energy. Then the enzymatic reaction mixture of CBS was analysed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and LCMS. The results showed that the disaccharide synthesized by CBS in vitro is cellobiose (Fig. 2). Furthermore, cellobiose was used as the substrate to study whether CBS has the transglycosylation activity to turn cellobiose into sophorose. The results showed that CBS cannot transfer the cellobiose to form sophorose (Fig. 2b).

To examine the affinity of CBS with its substrates and product, we used Biacore T200 to study the interaction between those molecules. Affinity interaction was observed between CBS and three examined molecules including glucose. The equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) of CBS binding to UDPG, glucose or cellobiose was 2.09E-6 (M), 3.84E-6 (M) and 1.85E-5 (M), respectively (Supplementary Fig. 5 and S4 Table). The data indicated that CBS tends to affinity binding to UDPG and glucose even if the latter may represses the activity of CBS by competitive inhibition.

Synthesis pathway of cellobiose in vivo

UDPG, the preferred substrate for β-1, 4-glucan biosynthesis in both plant and bacteria22,23,24, is synthesized from glucose by Leloir pathway which involves the catalysis of glucokinase (GLK), phosphoglucomutase (PGM) and UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (UGP)25,26,27. In order to determine the synthesis pathway of cellobiose in vivo, we constructed R. stolonifer Δugp and researched the transcription level of related genes. Compared with the wild strain TP-02, the transcription level of cbs was sharply declined in the mutant strain. The results indicated that the deletion of ugp could influence the normal transcription of cbs. In particular, the transcription levels of four cellulase coding genes (GenBank No. JX315341, KF916015, KF916016, KP115896) were also sharply declined in R. stolonifer Δugp (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the sugar components in vivo of R. stolonifer Δugp cultured on glucose medium was analysed by HPLC. The results showed that texted mutants cannot synthesize cellobiose (Supplementary Fig. 6a). These results suggested that UDPG might be the major glycosyl donor for CBS to synthesize cellobiose. It could be due to the deficiency of ugp which hinders normal formation of UDPG, consequently, affects the synthesis of cellobiose and the transcription of the cellulase genes.

Figure 3
figure 3

Comparison of wild-type R. stolonifer TP-02 and Δugp strains in the transcription level. The parent TP-02 and its Δugp mutant strain were cultured in a 2% glucose media. The deletion of ugp resulted in a sharply declined of normal transcription of cbs and cellulase genes. Error bars denote s.e.m. *P < 0.05.

Effect of CBS on the synthesis of cellulose

To evaluate the effect of CBS on the synthesis of cellulase, we constructed the R. stolonifer Δcbs by homologous recombination using R. stolonifer TP-02 as the parent strain. Furthermore, we constructed the complementation strain Rcbs to identify that the characteristics observed form Δcbs mutants were indeed caused by the deletion of cbs. Colony morphology and conidiation of those three strains were analysed. As shown in Fig. 4, no apparent changes of phenotypic were observed, suggesting that deficiency of cbs doesn’t substantially influence the spores and hyphae development in R. stolonifer. The results of Congo red staining showed that the deletion of cbs caused a decrease in CMC activity. The R. stolonifer parent, Rcbs and Δcbs strains were inoculated on the starch fermentation medium in 5 L fermenters and cultured under the same conditions. The culture supernatants were analysed by SDS-PAGE (Supplementary Fig. 7) and cellulase assayed (Fig. 5). The activity of cellulase produced by R. stolonifer Δcbs (FPA activity is 4.61 IU/mL) is significantly lower than the parent strain (FPA activity is 17.93 IU/mL) and the Rcbs strain (FPA activity is 14.54 IU/mL). Like the FPA activity displayed, the activities of endoglucanases, cellobiohydrolases and β-glucosidases produced by R. stolonifer Δcbs were also much lower than the parent (Fig. 5c–e). These results indicate that deficiency of cbs results in a reduced production of cellulase in R. stolonifer.

Figure 4
figure 4

Phenotypic observations and cellulase production of R. stolonifer TP-02, Rcbs and Δcbs strains. (a) The colony morphology (cultivated in PDA plates), Congo red staining (cultivated in 2% CMC plates), hypha shape and spore morphology (electron microscope) of TP-02, Rcbs and Δcbs were compared. The double-headed arrow marks the transparent circle. (b) Determination of the FPA activity of those three strains using 2% glucose (b) or 2% rice straw (c) as the single carbon source. The data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. from three independent experiments. The statistical significance was calculated with the t-test, *P < 0.05.

Figure 5
figure 5

Comparison of R. stolonifer TP-02, Rcbs and Δcbs strains from both the level of expression and transcription. (a) The wet weight and FPA activity of TP-02, Rcbs and Δcbs cultured in the fermentation medium contains10% starch hydrolyzate in 5 L fermenters. (b) Relative mRNA expression of cellulase genes from those three strains detected by RT-qPCR. (c) The activities of endoglucanase (c), β-glucosidase (d) and cellobiohydrolase (e) of those three strains. The data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. from three independent experiments. The statistical significance was calculated with the t-test, *P < 0.05.

To show the effect of CBS, rice straw and glucose were used as single carbon source to culture R. stolonifer parent, Rcbs and Δcbs strains. The results of cellulase production experiments indicated that deficiency of cbs could result in a reduced production of cellulase in both the cellulosic and non-cellulosic substrates (Fig. 4b,c). The activity of cellulase produced by R. stolonifer Δcbs (FPA activity is 4.15 IU/mL) is significantly lower than the parent strain (FPA activity is 13.42 IU/mL) and the Rcbs strain (FPA activity is 10.87 IU/mL) when induced by rice straw. Similarly, the FPA activities of R. stolonifer and its deficient strain Δcbs were 0.96 IU/mL and 0.14 IU/mL, respectively, when the glucose was used as carbon source.

We further analysed the transcription of cellulase coding genes in R. stolonifer parent, Rcbs and Δcbs strains induced by starch hydrolyzate to confirm whether CBS controls the synthesis of cellulase. The transcription levels of these genes in those three strains were analysed by RT-qPCR and the results showed that they are significantly downregulated in R. stolonifer Δcbs (Fig. 5b).

Induction pathway of cellulose

Cellobiose, which activates the transcription factor CLR-1 and promotes the expression of cellodextrin transporters, β-glucosidases and CLR-2, is required for the cellulase induction mediated by CLR-1 and CLR-2 in Neurospora crassa 2, 28. The cellobiose response regulator ClbR (CLR-2 homologous protein) of Aspergillus aculeatus has been confirmed to drive the expression of carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZy) genes29. To study the induction pathway of cellulase regulated by CBS, we constructed the R. stolonifer Δclr1, and Δclr2. Through comparison the transcription levels of cellulase genes from parent and mutant strains cultured in glucose media, we determined that deficiency of clr1 or clr2 could result in a significant down-regulation of cellulase expression (Fig. 6). It indicates that the induction pathway controlled by cellobiose response regulator CLR is the main way to synthesize cellulase under the condition of glucose. Moreover, clr1 is the key regulator of clr2, while the level of clr2 plays a key role in this induction pathway of cellulase.

Figure 6
figure 6

Comparative analysis of the transcription of cellulase genes from R. stolonifer TP-02 and its mutant strains. Data represent mean ± s.e.m. of triplicate experiments.*P < 0.05 by two-tailed t-test.

Based on the above results, we designed a new induction model of cellulase (Fig. 7). Firstly, glucose was formed to the UDPG by a series of metabolic processes that catalysed by GLK, PGM, and UGP. Secondly, UDPG was catalysed by CBS to synthesize the cellobiose for opening the induction of cellulase. Finally, this self-synthetic cellobiose activated the CLR1 to promote the expression of CLR2, and then turn on the transcription of cellulase genes.

Figure 7
figure 7

Hypothetical induction model of cellulase from R. stolonifer TP-02 under the cultivation of glucose. Glucose enters the cell through transporters GLUT and is converted to glucose-6-phosphate and glucose-1-phosphate step by step. The glucose-1-phosphate is catalysed by pyrophosphorylase (UGP) to form UDPG. Then cellobiose is synthesized by CBS using UDPG as the glycosyl donor. Through activating the cellobiose response regulator CLR1 and promoting the expression of CLR2, the self-synthetic cellobiose turns on the induction expression of cellulase. CCR refers to the carbon metabolic repressive effect that is a crucial regulation in microorganism preventing the expression of enzymes required for utilization of complex carbon sources when simple carbon sources like glucose are present in the medium.


Previous studies often divide cellulase into inducible and constitutive two systems, which constrain the further regulation and modification of the entire cellulase system. Through the discovery and in-depth study of CBS from R. stolonifer, we determine that a cellulase self-inducing system has naturally evolved in R. stolonifer. By examining the purified CBS in vitro, it has been confirmed that CBS can synthesize cellobiose from UDPG that is the activated product of glucose catalysed by a series of enzymes in glycolysis30. Because UDPG can be developed from both cellulosic and non-cellulosic substrates by enzymolysis or thermal processing, we anticipate that the CBS would be the key enzyme participates in the control of cellulase synthesis. Its ability to catalyse cellobiose synthesis has an important role in explaining the induction synthesis of cellulase.

Although several models based on cellulosic substrates have been proposed, the non-cellulosic substrates containing glucose, oligosaccharide and starch sugar usually attract the attention on the carbon metabolic repression they caused, thereby ignoring the low expression levels of cellulase under these conditions31. This low level of expression might be derived from the induction of cellobiose generated by CBS. Furthermore, the concentration of UDPG in vivo should be in equilibrium, and accumulation of a large number of cellobiose could never be formed in vivo. It may explain the low levels of initial source of cellulase with cellulosic substrates, and provide a new view of the induction mechanism of cellulase synthesis. Based on the data, we construct a cellulase synthesis model of R. stolonifer under glucose condition, thus updating the cognition of “constitutive expression” theory of cellulase and providing a comprehensive model basis for subsequent genetic modification.

Because fermentation time is generally long and the production costs are high due to the characteristics of strains and the factors of culture conditions, filamentous fungi currently used in cellulase production is hardly to be fast and efficient32. The R. stolonifer has the capacity to secrete various cellulases and hemicellulases with faster enzyme production than Trichoderma reesei, showing an attractive industrial development and application potential. Based on successfully constructing a specific strain by regulation of enzymes participated in the UDPG synthetic pathway, and analysing the structure and function of CBS to engineer new protein molecules, our study provides a possible solution to achieve large-scale synthesis of cellulase since simple carbon source can be utilized to activate the synthesis of cellulase with a rapid development of cells.

Materials and Methods

Strains and reagents

R. stolonifer TP-02 was isolated in our laboratory and stored in China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC No. 11119). Sophorose, ATP, and UDPG were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

An LC/MS/MS method was developed for the measurement of cellobiose produced by R. stolonifer TP-02 from glucose in vivo using a Shimadzu LCMS-8030 liquid chromatography mass spectrometer. The LC column used was an XBridge Amide (Waters). Mobile phase was 82% acetonitrile and 18% water. Measurement conditions: ESI; DL 250 °C; nebulizing gas 3 L/min; heat block 400 °C; drying gas 15 L/min.

Identification of cellobiose synthetase encoding gene

The R. stolonifer TP-02 was cultured in PDA liquid medium and shaken for 24 h at 30 °C (200 rpm). The mycelium was harvested and freeze-dried. The genomic DNA was extracted by the standard CTAB method33. Amplification of a DNA fragment encoding a portion of CBS was done by the primers P1: 5′-CCKCRGGTSGACRTNNTG-3′ and P2: 5′-AWGCBGTYGAGAGTGGCC-3′. The PCR product was purified by the kit and sequenced by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The flanking sequences were amplified by TAIL-PCR34 with the primers listed in the Table S1. Homology alignment of the primary structure between CBS and other enzymes was carried out in the GenBank database using the BLAST program, together with the MegAlign program and the ClustalW2 (

Protein expression and purification

The target gene was connected with pET28a vector and transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3). The recombinants were cultured in LB liquid medium and shaken for 10 h at 37 °C (220 rpm), followed by switching to an improved TB medium (peptone 12 g/L, yeast extract 24 g/L, KH2PO4 2.31 g/L, K2HPO4 9.85 g/L, glycerol 9.85 g/L, pH7.0) with 1% inoculums size. Protein synthesis was induced by addition of 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside at OD 600 ~ 0.6. After protein expression for 18 h at 16 °C, cells were collected by centrifugation, re-suspended in PBS buffer and lysed by sonication. The cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation at 20,000 g for 45 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was loaded onto a His Trap FF column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) attached to a ÄKTA Pure FPLC system (GE Healthcare) and washed with ten column volumes of wash buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.5 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole. The sample was eluted with the same buffer containing 400 mM imidazole. Samples were collected for SDS-PAGE electrophoresis verification.

In vitro reactions

All reactions were performed in PBS buffer (pH 6.0, 50 mM). A mixture of the purified CBS (100 μg), 0.5 mM ATP and glucose (20 mg) or UDPG (20 mg) was suspended in 1 mL of PBS buffer and the mixture was stirring at 30 °C for 1 day. After reaction, the mixture was centrifuged and treated with filter membrane (pore size 0.45 μm). HPLC was utilized to analyze the composition of the samples. Measurement conditions: column, XBridge Amide (Waters); column temperature, 30 °C; mobile phase, 82% acetonitrile, and 18% water; flow rate, 0.4 mL/min; injection volume, 20 μL. Standard configuration: standard mixture was prepared by 1% mobile phase.

Thin layer chromatography (TLC)

The reaction mixture of CBS, UDPG and ATP was further analysed by TLC. The stationary phase was 6 g silica gel GF254 dissolved by 0.02 M sodium acetate trihydrate (containing 0.5% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose). The developing solvent was n-butyl alcohol: ddH2O: acetic acid: ammonia water in 10: 5: 5: 1 (v/v). Colour developing agent was composed of two reagents: the first one is the mixture of aniline, diphenylamine and phosphoric acid which was prepared by dissolving 4 g aniline in 4 mL diphenylamine and adding 200 mL acetone and 20 mL 85% phosphoric acid; the second one is the mixture of 5% concentrated sulphuric acid dissolved by ethyl alcohol. These two mixed reagents were sprayed in the thin-layer plate respectively. Spots of carbohydrate components could be observed after heating at 105 °C for 5-10 min. The concentration of the entire master standard is 1% (m/v).

Biacore analysis

Tests for adherence between CBS and micromolecules were performed in triplicate using a biosensor Biacore T200 recording SPR. CM7 (GE Healthcare) sensor chips were used to fasten CBS (300 µg/mL) in 14000 RU via amino coupling reaction. Binding experiments were carried out in the binding buffer of 50 mM NaAc, pH 4.5, 100 µM EDTA, at a flow rate of 30 µL/min. UDPG, glucose, cellobiose and maltotriose (negative control) were dissolved in gradient (0, 0.78, 1.56, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25 µM) by 2 mM PBS buffer.

Construction of R. stolonifer mutant strains

The full-length hygromycin resistance gene hyg was respectively inserted into cbs, ugp, clr1, and clr2 by the overlapping PCR35. All primers used in the study were presented in the Table S2. The constructed genes were connected with the pUCm-T carrier and transformed into E. coli DH5α. The positive clones were screened and identified by sequencing the plasmid extracted by a kit. The pUCmT-hyg-cbs, pUCmT-hyg-ugp, pUCmT-hyg-clr1, and pUCmT-hyg-clr2 were added to the pre-treatment spore suspension of R. stolonifer (germinated for 8 h), and placed on ice for 10 min before shifted into the pole cup. After shocking at 1500 V, the solution was immediately added to 1 mL pre-cooled PDA on ice for 20 min, and then cultured at 30 °C, 100 rpm for 90 min. Then, it was coated to resistant plates (hygromycin 180 μg/mL) and incubated at 30 °C. Preparation of the germinated spore: rinsed the spores with sterile water, filtrated by two layers of gauze, inoculated into PDA liquid medium, cultured at 30 °C, 180 rpm for 8 h until spore germination (electron microscopy was used to determine the spore germination time).

Complementation experiments

The complementation cassette was used to transform into the Δcbs strains to identify that the interesting phenotypes observed for the mutants were indeed caused by the deletion of cbs. The cbs wild-type allele complementation cassette was amplified through the primer pairs cbs-F + cbs-R (Table S2). The pUCm-T-cbs was constructed and transformed into the Δcbs mutant. A PDA plate without hygromycin resistance was used to preliminary screening by incubating the transformant at 30 °C. The resistant plates (hygromycin 180 μg/mL) were used to secondary screening. The complementation strain Rcbs was obtained and verified by amplifying cbs from the genomic DNA.

Enzyme characterization of cellulose

The R. stolonifer parent, Δcbs strains and Rcbs were grown on PDA plates. Colony morphology and conidiation were analysed after inoculating the PDA plates or screening plates that contained 2% CMC and 1% Congo red at 30 °C for 3 days. The spores of these three strains were inoculated on the fermentation medium in 5 L fermenters and cultured under the same conditions. By sampling at time interval of 6 h, the cell wet weight was recorded and the activity of cellulase was determined. The properly diluted supernatant (1 mL) were incubated with 1 mL substrate in sodium acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH4.8) at 50 °C for 30 min. Inactivated enzyme solution was used as a control group. The reduced sugars were measured according to the DNS method36. Filter paper (Whatman), CMC-Na and salicin were used as substrate to determine the activity of filter paper enzyme (FPase), endoglucanase (CMCase) and β-glucosidase, respectively37. Furthermore, the activity of cellobiohydrolase was determined with 0.5% (w/v) microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel, Sigma) at 50°C for 60 min. A unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing one μmol of glucose equivalents per minute. Fermentation medium: 10% starch hydrolyzate/2% rice straw/2% glucose as single carbon source, 5% bran steep liquor (50 g wheat bran, boiled for 30 min, filtrated by 4 layer gauze, bring volume to 1000 mL with water), 0.5% NH4Cl, 0.5% KH2PO4, 0.4% MgSO4.7H2O, 0.4% CaCl2, 0.025% PEG4000, trace element solution, Tween-80, 1.2% methionine, 0.6% yeast extract.

RT-qPCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (TAKARA, Dalian, China) and reverse transcribed using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (TAKARA, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer protocol. Quantitative RT-qPCR was conducted using SYBR Green Mix according to the manufacturer protocol. The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase A gene (gpdA) was used as the reference gene. RT-qPCR analysis was performed using the iQ5 Multicolor Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). All primers used in the study were presented in the Table S3.


All in vitro experiments were performed in biological triplicate. Statistical significance of the difference among groups was calculated using Student’s t-test. Data are presented as means ± s.e.s. P < 0.05 was considered to represent a statistically significant difference.


  1. Payne, C. M. et al. Fungal cellulases. Chem Rev 115, 1308–1448, doi:10.1021/cr500351c (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coradetti, S. T. et al. Conserved and essential transcription factors for cellulase gene expression in ascomycete fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 7397–7402, doi:10.1073/pnas.1200785109 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hulme, M. A. & Stranks, D. W. Induction and the regulation of production of cellulase by fungi. Nature 226, 469–470 (1970).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shida, Y. et al. The impact of a single-nucleotide mutation of bgl2 on cellulase induction in a Trichoderma reesei mutant. Biotechnol Biofuels 8, 230, doi:10.1186/s13068-015-0420-y (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Carle-Urioste, J. C. et al. Cellulase induction in Trichoderma reesei by cellulose requires its own basal expression. J Biol Chem 272, 10169–10174 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suto, M. & Tomita, F. Induction and catabolite repression mechanisms of cellulase in fungi. J Biosci Bioeng 92, 305–311 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, W. et al. Two major facilitator superfamily sugar transporters from Trichoderma reesei and their roles in induction of cellulase biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 288, 32861–32872, doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.505826 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, S. & Wayman, M. Novel inducers derived from starch for cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei. Process Biochem 27, 327–334 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jourdier, E. et al. Cellulase activity mapping of Trichoderma reesei cultivated in sugar mixtures under fed-batch conditions. Biotechnol Biofuels 6, 79, doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-79 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakari-Setälä, T. & Penttilä, M. Production of Trichoderma reesei cellulases on glucose-containing media. Appl Environ Microbiol 61, 3650–3655 (1995).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bischof, R. et al. Comparative analysis of the Trichoderma reesei transcriptome during growth on the cellulase inducing substrates wheat straw and lactose. Biotechnol Biofuels 6, 127, doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-127 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ha, S. et al. Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of simultaneous cellobiose and xylose fermentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 504–509, doi:10.1073/pnas.1010456108 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mandels, M., Parrish, F. W. & Reese, E. T. Sophorose as an inducer of cellulase in Trichoderma viride. J Bacteriol 83, 400–408 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nogueira, K. M. V. et al. Evidence of cAMP involvement in cellobiohydrolase expression and secretion by Trichoderma reesei in presence of the inducer sophorose. BMC Microbiol 15, 195, doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0536-z (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaheri, M., Leisola, M. & Kauppinen, V. Transglycosylation products of cellulase system of Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol Lett 1, 41–46 (1979).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhat, S., Goodenough, P. W., Owen, E. & Bhat, M. K. Cellobiose: A true inducer of cellulosome in different strains of Clostridium thermocellum. FEMS Microbiol Lett 111, 73–78 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaheri, M. P., Leisola, M. E. & Kauppinen, V. S. Formation and release of cellulolytic enzymes during growth of Trichoderma reesei on cellobiose and glycerol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 8, 73–80 (1979).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Charnock, S. J. & Davies, G. J. Structure of the nucleotide-diphospho-sugar transferase, SpsA from Bacillus subtilis, in native and nucleotide-complexed forms. Biochemistry 38, 6380–6385 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Field, R. A. Glycobiology: Challenging reaction equilibria. Nat Chem Biol 7, 658–659, doi:10.1038/nchembio.668 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma, K. P. & Bhatia, I. S. Sucrose metabolism in Sorghum vulgare at ripening. Physiol Plant 48, 470–476 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morgan, J. L., Strumillo, J. & Zimmer, J. Crystallographic snapshot of cellulose synthesis and membrane translocation. Nature 493, 181–186, doi:10.1038/nature11744 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ray, P. M., Shininger, T. L. & Ray, M. M. Isolation of β-glucan synthetase particles from plant cells and identification with golgi membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 64 (1969).

  23. Yoo, M. & Wendel, J. F. Comparative evolutionary and developmental dynamics of the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fiber transcriptome. PLoS Genet 10, e1004073, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004073 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, T. et al. Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fiber improvement. Nat Biotechnol 33, 531–537, doi:10.1038/nbt.3207 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leloir, L. F. & Cardini, C. E. Biosynthesis of glycogen from uridine diphosphate glucose. J Am Chem Soc 79, 6340–6341 (1957).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leloir, L. F., de Fekete, M. A. R. & Cardini, C. E. Starch and oligosaccharide synthesis from uridine diphosphate glucose. J Biol Chem 236, 636–641 (1961).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Recondo, A. & Leloir, L. F. Adenosine diphosphate glucose and starch synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 6, 85–88 (1961).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Coradetti, S. T., Xiong, Y. & Glass, N. L. Analysis of a conserved cellulase transcriptional regulator reveals inducer-independent production of cellulolytic enzymes in Neurospora crassa. MicrobiologyOpen 2, 595–609, doi:10.1002/mbo3.94 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kunitake, E. et al. Effects of clbR overexpression on enzyme production in Aspergillus aculeatus vary depending on the cellulosic biomass degrading enzyme species. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 79, 488–495, doi:10.1080/09168451.2014.982501 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Flores-Díaz, M. et al. Cellular UDP-glucose deficiency caused by a single point mutation in the UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase gene. J Biol Chem 272, 23784–23791 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hsieh, C. C., Cannella, D., Jørgensen, H., Felby, C. & Thygesen, L. G. Cellulase inhibition by high concentrations of monosaccharides. J Agric Food Chem 62, 3800–3805, doi:10.1021/jf5012962 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Berka, R. M. et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the thermophilic biomass-degrading fungi Myceliophthora thermophila and Thielavia terrestris. Nat Biotechnol 29, 922–929, doi:10.1038/nbt.1976 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lipp, M., Brodmann, P., Pietsch, K., Pauwels, J. & Anklam, E. IUPAC Collaborative trial study of a method to detect genetically modified soy beans & maize in dried powder. J Aoac Int 82, 923–928 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Singer, T. & Burke, E. High-throughput TAIL-PCR as a tool to identify DNA flanking insertions. Methods Mol Biol 236, 241–272 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K. & Pease, L. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain resction. Gene 77, 51–59 (1989).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller, G. L., Blum, R., Glennon, W. E. & Burton, A. L. Measurement of carboxymethylcellulase activity. Anal Biochem 1, 127–132 (1960).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dhillon, G. S., Brar, S. K., Kaur, S., Metahni, S. & M’hamdi, N. Lactoserum as a moistening medium and crude inducer for fungal cellulase and hemicellulase induction through solid-state fermentation of apple pomace. Biomass Bioenerg 41, 165–174, doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.021 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31270135). We thank the Analysis and Testing Centre of Anhui Polytechnic University for helping in sample analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Y.Z. and B.T. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.Z. performed the experiments and analysed the data. B.T. and G.D. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. Y.Z. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Tang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Tang, B. & Du, G. Self-induction system for cellulase production by cellobiose produced from glucose in Rhizopus stolonifer . Sci Rep 7, 10161 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing