The adenylate cyclase toxin-hemolysin (CyaA, ACT or AC-Hly) translocates its adenylate cyclase (AC) enzyme domain into target cells in a step that depends on membrane cholesterol content. We thus examined what role in toxin activities is played by the five putative cholesterol recognition amino acid consensus (CRAC) motifs predicted in CyaA hemolysin moiety. CRAC-disrupting phenylalanine substitutions had no impact on toxin activities and these were not inhibited by free cholesterol, showing that the putative CRAC motifs are not involved in cholesterol binding. However, helix-breaking proline substitutions in these segments uncovered a structural role of the Y632, Y658, Y725 and Y738 residues in AC domain delivery and pore formation by CyaA. Substitutions of Y940 of the fifth motif, conserved in the acylated domains of related RTX toxins, did not impact on fatty-acylation of CyaA by CyaC and the CyaA-Y940F mutant was intact for toxin activities on erythrocytes and myeloid cells. However, the Y940A or Y940P substitutions disrupted the capacity of CyaA to insert into artificial lipid bilayers or target cell membranes. The aromatic ring of tyrosine 940 side chain thus appears to play a key structural role in molecular interactions that initiate CyaA penetration into target membranes.
The 1706 residue-long adenylate cyclase toxin-hemolysin (CyaA, ACT or AC-Hly) plays a key role in virulence of pathogenic Bordetellae 1, 2. CyaA belongs to the family of repeats-in-toxin (RTX) proteins and consists of an N-terminal enzymatic adenylate cyclase (AC) domain of about 400 residues that is fused by an “AC to Hly linker segment” to a pore-forming RTX hemolysin (Hly) moiety of approximately 1300 residues3, 4. The Hly moiety then itself consists of a hydrophobic pore-forming domain, a fatty acyl-modified domain, an RTX calcium-binding domain and a C-terminal secretion signal2, 5. Hly mediates cell binding of CyaA and delivers its enzymatic AC domain into the cytosol of host cells, where the AC converts ATP to cAMP6, 7. In parallel, the Hly moiety oligomerizes into cation-selective pores that permeabilize cell membrane and allow efflux of potassium from cells8,9,10,11. Both toxin activities then depend on the posttranslational activation of proCyaA to CyaA by covalent fatty-acylation of the ε-amino groups of lysine residues 860 and 983 by a co-expressed protein acyltransferase, CyaC12,13,14,15.
CyaA exerts a complex array of cytotoxic and immunosubversive activities on host phagocytes16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 to which the toxin specifically binds through the complement receptor 3 (CR3), known also as the αMβ2 integrin, CD11b/CD18, or Mac-124, 25. The initial interaction of CyaA with N-linked oligosaccharides26, 27 is followed by specific recognition of CR3 through a specific segment of its CD11b subunit24, 25. With one to two orders of magnitude lower efficacy, the CyaA toxin can penetrate also non-myeloid cells that lack the CR3 receptor, or even naked lipid bilayers28,29,30,31.
Accumulated evidence suggests that at least two alternative and distinct conformers of CyaA co-exist and operate within the target cell membrane. These CyaA conformers exert two parallel and divergent activities, one accounting for translocation of the AC domain across cellular membrane, and the other resulting in formation of a cation selective membrane pore32,33,34,35. Translocation of the AC domain depends on membrane potential and proceeds with a very short half-time directly across the cytoplasmic membrane of target cells36, 37, without the need for endocytosis29. Previously we showed that the translocation intermediate of the AC domain itself participates in formation of a novel type of calcium ion conduit across the membrane of monocytic cells38. Calcium entry-dependent recruitment of the CyaA-CR3 complex into lipid rafts then follows, where the cholesterol-rich lipid environment promotes translocation of the AC domain across cell membrane39.
The presence of cholesterol in the membrane was, indeed, previously found to enhance the binding and lytic capacity of CyaA on erythrocytes and artificial membranes30, 40. Moreover, two other RTX toxins, the Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans leukotoxin LtxA and the Escherichia coli α-hemolysin HlyA, were previously shown to specifically bind cholesterol41,42,43. These toxins possess in their pore-forming domains the so called cholesterol recognition/interaction amino acid consensus (CRAC) motifs. These consist of the L/V-(X)(1–5)-Y-(X)(1–5)-R/K pattern, where (X)(1–5) represents between one and five residues of any amino acid44. Single residue substitutions in this CRAC motifs were then found to markedly impair interaction of diverse proteins with target membranes45, 46.
Here we examined the function of five putative CRAC motifs that could be predicted in the sequence of the membrane-interacting Hly moiety of CyaA. We show that these motifs do not function as CRAC motifs and are not involved in the interaction of CyaA with target cell cholesterol. Instead, these segments are playing an important structural role in the initial step of toxin penetration into target membrane, thus determining its capacity to translocate the AC domain into cells and to form the cell-permeabilizing pores.
The putative CRAC motifs in the Hly moiety of CyaA do not recognize cholesterol
Analysis of the primary sequence of the membrane-interacting Hly moiety revealed four putative tyrosine residue-containing CRAC motifs in the pore-forming domain and one putative CRAC motif in the acylated domain of CyaA (Fig. 1A). To probe whether these are bona fide CRAC motifs and what is their role in toxin activities, we replaced the Y632, Y658, Y725, Y738 and Y940 residues by phenylalanines. Such conservative substitutions were, indeed, reported to disrupt the bona fide CRAC motifs45,46,47. To assess the capacity of purified mutant CyaA variants to penetrate target membranes we used as model myeloid phagocytes the mouse J774A.1 macrophages that express the CyaA receptor CR3 (CD11b+ cells). In parallel, sheep erythrocytes lacking the CR3 molecule (CD11b− cells) were used as model non-myeloid target cells. Contrary to expectation, none of the Tyr > Phe substitutions in the putative CRAC motifs affected any significantly the cell binding, AC domain translocation or the pore-forming capacities of the CyaA mutants (Fig. 1B,C). Therefore, to corroborate that cholesterol does not play a role in membrane binding and penetration of the Hly moiety of CyaA, the toxin was preincubated with increasing concentrations of free cholesterol for 20 minutes and was then further incubated in the presence of free cholesterol with J774A.1 cells or erythrocytes. As shown in Fig. 2A,B, even 5 µM free cholesterol had no inhibitory impact on membrane insertion of and pore-formation, or AC delivery by CyaA (AC translocation into cytosol of cells and elevation of cAMP concentration). In contrast, as shown in Fig. 2C, exposure of the RTX cytolysin ApxIA of A. pleuropneumoniae 48 to as little as 0.5 nM free cholesterol reduced its hemolytic activity. This inhibition of ApxIA activity was highly cholesterol-specific, as it was not inhibited by the structurally related ergosterol molecule (Fig. 2D). These data, hence, suggest that the putative CRAC motifs of CyaA do not mediate cholesterol binding and that CyaA insertion into target membranes does not depend on cholesterol binding.
Tyrosine residues Y632, Y658, Y725 and Y738 are part of α-helical structures involved in AC domain translocation and CyaA pore formation
Secondary structure models indicated that the Y632, Y658, Y725 and Y738 residues are predicted to be part of long α-helical segments within the CyaA segment consisting of residues 600 to 750 (Fig. 3A). We therefore examined the impact of substitution of these tyrosine residues by helix-breaking proline residues. As shown in Fig. 3B, the Y632P substitution abolished both the AC domain translocation capacity, as well as the hemolytic activity of the toxin on sheep erythrocytes. The Y658P, Y725P and Y738P substitutions then reduced the specific AC domain translocating capacity only in part (e.g. by ~62, ~43 and ~29%), but the Y658P ablated the hemolytic activity. In contrast, the toxin Y725P and Y738P substitutions had a milder effect, reducing the specific hemolytic activity by ~86% and ~44%, respectively. At the same time, however, all four proline substitutions affected binding of the CyaA mutants to erythrocytes only slightly, if at all (Fig. 3B). Moreover, a similar pattern of cell binding and AC translocating capacities of the four Tyr > Pro CyaA mutants was also observed with CD11b+ J774A.1 cells, to which CyaA binds through the CR3 receptor (Fig. 3C, Supplementary Fig. S1)24, 25. Indeed, helix-preserving alanine substitutions of the same tyrosine residues had no impact on the activities of CyaA within target membranes (Supplementary Fig. S2). These results suggest that rather than being part of CRAC motifs, the aromatic side chains of the tyrosine residues 632, 658, 725 and 738 play a structural role in α-helical segments that are involved in membrane translocation of the AC domain and in formation of CyaA pores.
The tyrosine residues Y632 and Y658 are located between two putative transmembrane α-helices, predicted to form between residues 607 to 627 (α-helix607-627) and 678 to 698 (α-helix678-698), while the Y725 and Y738 residues are C-terminally adjacent to the α-helix678-698 (Fig. 3A). Previously, devastating effects of deletions destroying these segments (Δ615-655 and Δ663-688) indicated that this region of CyaA molecule may play an important role in membrane activities of the toxin49. Moreover, helix-breaking A616P or A687P substitutions within these segments reduced the hemolytic activity of the Hly moiety of CyaA50. To verify that these segments form long α-helical structures, we introduced helix-breaking proline residue substitutions at the beginning, in the center and at the end of each of the two predicted α-helices (Fig. 3A). As summarized in Fig. 3D,E, the introduction of proline residues had no or only a negligible effect on the capacity of the mutant toxins to bind cells. Moreover, the binding to CD11b+ J774A.1 cells could be blocked by the competing CD11b-specific antibody M1/70 (Supplementary Fig. S1)24, 25. However, the substitution of the A609 and E622 residues affected both the capacity of CyaA to translocate the AC domain into cells (Fig. 3D,E) and to form the hemolytic pores within erythrocyte membrane (Fig. 3D). In contrast, substitution of the glutamate 622 by residues that allow formation of an α-helical structure, such as by a neutral glutamine or an oppositely charged lysine residue, had no (CyaA-E622Q), or only a small (CyaA-E622K, ~25–30% decrease) impact on the specific membrane translocation and hemolytic capacities of the toxin, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S3). The proline substitutions of the hydrophobic residues within the α-helices (e.g. A616P, A680P, A687P and V695P) then rather selectively reduced only the specific hemolytic activity of the mutant toxins (Fig. 3D). In line with that, all these proline substitutions affected the pore-forming capacity of the toxin in artificial planar lipid bilayers made of 3% asolectin (Table 1 and Fig. 4). As summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 4, compared to the most frequent single pore conductance of ~8.7 pS, observed for pores formed by intact CyaA, the pores formed by the toxins carrying the proline substitutions exhibited a reduced conductance (e.g. ~6.4 pS for CyaA-A609P, ~5.4 pS for CyaA-E622P, ~6.1 pS for CyaA-A687P and ~6.9 pS for CyaA-V695P). As documented by the number of plus signs in Table 1, and by the representative activity recordings in Fig. 4A, the overall membrane activity (i.e. compounded contributions of pore conductance, pore lifetime, and of the specific frequency of formation of pores) of these proline mutants of CyaA was reduced. In particular, the pores formed by CyaA with proline substitutions within the α-helix678-698 were less stable and exhibited shorter mean lifetimes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.88 s, as compared to the mean lifetime of ~1.64 s observed for intact CyaA pores. The predicted α-helix607-627 thus appears to be importantly involved in both AC domain delivery and toxin pore formation, while the α-helix678-698 appears to be exclusively involved in the pore-forming activity of CyaA.
The aromatic side chain of tyrosine residue 940 plays a key role in penetration of CyaA into target membrane
The Y940 residue is located in a predicted β-strand structure within the acylated domain of CyaA (Fig. 1A) and it appears to be highly conserved within the family of RTX toxins (Fig. 5A). To examine its role in activities of CyaA, we replaced Y940 with phenylalanine, alanine and proline residues. As verified by tandem mass spectrometry and documented in Table 2, the substitutions of the Y940 residue had no impact on the capacity of the co-expressed CyaC transacylase to recognize the acylated domain of proCyaA and to accomplish full fatty-acylation of the K860 and K983 residues, of which the latter is essential for the capacity of CyaA to bind and penetrate target membranes13,14,15, 51. The K860 and K983 residues of the CyaA-Y940F, CyaA-Y940A and CyaA-Y940P constructs were acylated by palmitoyl (C16:0) and palmitoleyl (cisΔ9 C16:1) residues to a comparable extent and at similar ratios as in intact CyaA. However, by difference to the CyaA-Y940F construct, which exhibited the same specific toxin activity on cells as intact CyaA, the CyaA-Y940A and CyaA-Y940P proteins exhibited a two- to three-fold reduced specific cell-binding capacity (Fig. 5B,C). Moreover, these constructs were essentially unable to translocate the AC domain across the membrane of target cells (Fig. 5B,C) and were largely impaired in the capacity to form the hemolytic pores within erythrocyte membrane (Fig. 5B). This was most likely not due to a defect of folding of the RTX domain that is required for CR3 receptor binding, as the reduced binding of the Y940A and Y940P constructs to CD11b+ J774A.1 could still be blocked by the CD11b-specific competing antibody M1/70 (Fig. 5D)24, 25.
Kinetic analysis of binding of the CyaA-Y940F/A/P toxin variants to erythrocytes revealed that while the amount of cell-bound CyaA-Y940F protein was increasing in time, as for intact CyaA (Fig. 6A), the initial low amount of cell-adsorbed CyaA-Y940A and CyaA-Y940P proteins hardly increased at all over the time of incubation with cells (Fig. 6A). This indicates that the capacity of the CyaA-Y940A and CyaA-Y940P constructs to irreversibly insert into the erythrocyte membrane, and thereby shift the cell association-dissociation equilibrium over time, was importantly impaired. Therefore, the specific AC translocating and pore-forming capacities of CyaA-Y940A and CyaA-Y940P constructs were compared to those of intact CyaA and CyaA-Y940F under conditions where equal CyaA protein amounts were bound per erythrocyte. This was achieved by increasing the input concentration of CyaA-Y940A/P variants in the binding assay approximately five-fold over the amount of intact CyaA or CyaA-Y940F (Fig. 6B). As shown in Fig. 6C, even under such conditions the CyaA-Y940A and CyaA-Y940P proteins still exhibited an almost nil AC domain translocation and pore-forming capacity on erythrocytes. In line with that, and despite the presence of an intact pore-forming domain, the CyaA-Y940A and CyaA-940P proteins exhibited a particularly low overall membrane activity also on artificial lipid bilayers (Table 1 and Fig. 6D). As further shown in Table 1 and Fig. 6E, the typical single pore conductance (8.0 ± 1.6 pS) and the mean lifetime (1.40 ± 0.18 s) of pores formed by the CyaA-Y940A variant were comparable to those of intact CyaA (8.7 ± 1.8 pS and 1.64 ± 0.14 s, respectively), but the CyaA-Y940A mutant formed pores with a much lower frequency than intact CyaA (Fig. 6D). The particularly rarely opening CyaA-Y940P pores exhibited a partially reduced conductance (6.3 ± 1.3 pS), with mean lifetime again comparable to those of intact CyaA (1.75 ± 0.76 s, Table 1 and Fig. 6E). These data, hence, reveal that the aromatic ring of the side chain of the highly conserved Y940 residue plays a key structural role in the CyaA molecule and its presence is essential for the initial interaction of CyaA with the lipid bilayer of the membrane, triggering proper insertion of crucial toxin segments and translocation of the AC domain and toxin pore formation.
We show here that the conserved tyrosine 940 residue of the putative CRAC motif in the acylated domain of CyaA plays a central structural role in membrane insertion and penetration of the toxin. Analysis of the functional role of the putative CRAC motifs in the Hly moiety of CyaA then revealed that these are not involved in cholesterol binding and that the C-terminal segment of the hydrophobic domain of CyaA consists of long α-helical structures that play a key role in toxin activities within target membranes.
We have initiated this work as our previous observations indicated that presence and relative content of cholesterol within membrane of CD11b+ macrophages determines the capacity of the membrane-inserted CyaA toxin to complete the translocation of the AC domain across the bilayer of membrane lipid microdomains (rafts) into target cell cytosol39. The herein presented results, however, reveal that CyaA does not directly bind cholesterol through the putative CRAC motifs within its Hly moiety. In line with previous observation that CyaA can insert into cholesterol depleted membranes39, these results suggest that interaction of the toxin with cholesterol is not involved in the initial interaction with the lipid bilayer prior to toxin incorporation into the plasma membrane of target cells. This distinguishes the mechanism of membrane penetration of CyaA from that of other related RTX cytolysins, such as the A. actinomycetemcomitans LtxA and E. coli HlyA, which possess bona fide cholesterol-binding sites and bind cholesterol with high affinity41,42,43, 52. Three motifs have, indeed, been previously implicated in cholesterol binding to transmembrane proteins, namely CRAC, CARC (inverted CRAC with the consensus sequence R/K-(X)(1–5)-Y/F-(X)(1–5)-L/V) and a cholesterol consensus motif53. The stringency of the consensus of the most well-known CRAC motif appears to be low and not all putative CRAC motifs bind cholesterol54. This appears to be also the case of the here-analyzed four predicted putative CRAC sites identified within the membrane-interacting Hly moiety of CyaA. Their key tyrosine residues (Y632, Y658, Y725 and Y738) could be substituted with phenylalanine or alanine residues without causing any decrease of membrane penetration and translocation activity of the toxin (c.f. Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. S2). In contrast, substitutions of these tyrosine residues by helix-breaking proline residues importantly reduced the activities of the toxin in target membranes (c.f. Fig. 3B,C). Hence, rather than being part of the CRAC motifs, the tyrosine residues 632, 658, 725 and 738 play a structural role in formation of the long α-helices that can be predicted in the segment comprising residues 600 to 750 of CyaA. That CyaA does not contain functional CRAC motifs that would bind cholesterol is also indicated by the observation that as high as 5 µM free cholesterol did not inhibit the capacity of CyaA to penetrate target cells. In contrast, the hemolytic activity of the related ApxIA toxin was affected already at 0.5 nM concentration of free cholesterol, while the structurally related ergosterol had no effect. It is thus plausible to speculate that by difference to CyaA, the ApxIA toxin recognizes and binds cholesterol through its consensus CRAC-CARC “mirror“ motif55 that is not present in CyaA (Supplementary Fig. S4). The cholesterol content of the membrane would thus modulate membrane insertion of CyaA40 and translocation of its AC domain39 in an indirect way, determining the propensity of lipids to lateral phase separation. Cholesterol would then increase the propensity of formation of liquid-ordered (lo) phase at the expense of liquid-disordered (ld) phase, thus lowering the energy barrier for AC domain translocation across lipid bilayer56, 57.
The here-analyzed segment of the pore-forming region, where four out of the five predicted putative CRAC motifs of the Hly are located, comprises also two predicted transmembrane α-helices (residue 607 to 627 and 678 to 698). Data presented here suggest that helix 607 to 627 is involved in translocation of the AC domain and in the parallel formation of CyaA pores. Indeed, helix-breaking proline substitutions within the putative transmembrane α-helix607-627 substantially reduced the pore-forming capacity of CyaA. The A609P and E622P substitutions also decreased the AC domain translocation capacity of the toxin (Fig. 7). On the other hand, all three proline substitutions within the predicted transmembrane α-helix678-698 selectively affected only the pore-forming activity of CyaA and altered the most frequent lifetimes or pore conductances of the formed CyaA pores. However, these substitutions did not affect the capacity of CyaA to translocate the AC domain across the membrane (Fig. 7). Similar dissociation of the pore-forming and AC translocating activities of CyaA has, indeed, been previously observed upon introduction of certain residue substitutions within two of three previously identified transmembrane α-helices32, 35, 58, predicted to form between residues 502 to 522, 529 to 549 and 565 to 591 of the pore-forming domain. The E516Q substitution selectively increased and the E570Q substitution selectively decreased the propensity of CyaA to form pores. Both substitutions, however, had no impact on the AC domain translocating capacity of the toxin32. Similar membrane activity dissociating effects were observed for diverse charge-altering or helix-breaking substitutions within the five thus far identified and mutagenized segments of the pore-forming domain. This would indicate that all these putative transmembrane α-helices cooperate in translocation of the AC domain and in formation of the CyaA pores within target membranes.
The molecular details of the mechanism of penetration of RTX toxins into target cell membranes and the role of their acylated domains in this process remain, however, poorly understood. Contrary to what one would expect, the fatty acyl modification of CyaA on lysine residues K860 and K983 does not appear to be per se essential for penetration of the toxin into a naked lipid bilayer membrane31. Rather, the fatty acyl chains linked to ε-amino groups of K860 and K983 residues appear to play a structural role in folding of the N-terminal (~600 residue-long) non-RTX moiety of CyaA59. By affecting the aggregation status of CyaA and the folding of its pore-forming domain, the acylation of K860 and K983 residues appears to enable an irreversible insertion of the hydrophobic domain of CyaA into cellular membrane, thus stabilizing the interaction of the toxin with its CR3 receptor on target cell membrane15. Moreover, the here-observed effects of the alanine and proline substitutions of the Y940 residue of the fifth putative CRAC motif reveal that the acylated domain plays a structural role in toxin activities within target membranes. The CyaA-Y940A and CyaA-Y940P proteins were largely impaired in their capacity to tightly associate with target cell membrane and were unable to translocate the AC domain or form pores across cellular membrane. In contrast, the Y940F construct with the phenolic group of the tyrosine side chain replaced by a simple benzene ring was fully active. This strongly suggests that the aromatic ring of the side chain of tyrosine 940 within the acylated domain plays a central role in formation of a structure that plays a crucial role in initiation of insertion and in proper positioning of the transmembrane segments of CyaA within target cell membrane. This would, indeed, go well with the recent identification of a conserved lysine/arginine residue cluster within the acylated domain that was predicted to participate in interaction of the acylated domain of CyaA with target cell membrane60.
Construction, production and purification of CyaA and ApxIA proteins
The pCACT3 plasmid was used for co-expression of cyaC and cyaA genes allowing production of recombinant CyaC-activated CyaA in E. coli.49. Oligonucleotide-directed PCR mutagenesis was used to construct pCACT3-derived plasmids for expression of CyaA mutant variants. Intact CyaA and its mutant variants were produced in the E. coli strain XL1-Blue (Stratagene) transformed with appropriate pCACT3-derived constructs. The cells were grown at 37 °C in MDO medium (yeast extract, 20 g/l; glycerol, 20 g/l; KH2PO4, 1 g/l; K2HPO4, 3 g/l; NH4Cl, 2 g/l; Na2SO4, 0.5 g/l; thiamine hydrochloride, 0.01 g/l) supplemented with 150 μg/ml of ampicillin, induced at OD600 = 0.6 with 1 mM isopropyl 1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG), and grown for an additional 4 hours. Then the cells were collected, disrupted by ultrasound, and the insoluble cell debris was extracted with 8 M urea in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) (TU buffer) containing 0.2 mM CaCl2. The CyaA proteins were purified by ion-exchange chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose followed by hydrophobic chromatography on phenyl-Sepharose as previously described3. For expression of the acylated ApxIA toxin48, the E. coli strain BL21 (λDE3) was transformed with the pET28b-apxIC-apxIA plasmid, harboring the apxIC and apxIA genes61. The cells were grown at 37 °C in MDO medium supplemented with 60 μg/ml of kanamycin, induced at OD600 = 0.6 with IPTG, and grown for an additional 4 hours. The cells were harvested by centrifugation, disrupted by ultrasound, and the insoluble cell debris was extracted with TU buffer. The urea extract was loaded on an Ni-NTA Sepharose column (GE Healthcare) that was subsequently washed with TU buffer containing 40 mM imidazole. The ApxIA protein was eluted from the column by TU buffer supplemented with 200 mM imidazole that was removed by Sephadex G-25 (GE Healthcare) column chromatography. Concentrations of the purified CyaA and ApxIA proteins were determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). The integrity of all proteins was systematically controlled by SDS/PAGE (not shown).
Cell binding, cell invasive and hemolytic activities on sheep erythrocytes
AC enzymatic activities were measured in the presence of 1 µM calmodulin as previously described62. One unit of AC activity corresponds to 1 µmol of cAMP formed per minute at 30 °C, pH 8.0. Hemolytic activity was measured by determining the hemoglobin release in time upon toxin incubation with washed sheep erythrocytes (5 × 108/ml) as previously described6. Cell invasive AC was measured as previously described3, by determining the AC protected against externally added trypsin upon internalization into sheep erythrocytes. Erythrocyte binding of the toxins was determined as previously described3. Activity of intact CyaA was taken as 100%.
Binding and cAMP elevation of CyaA on J774A.1 cells
Murine monocytes/macrophages J774A.1 (ATCC, number TIB-67) were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified air/CO2 (19:1) atmosphere in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 i.u./ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml) and amphotericin B (250 ng/ml). Prior to assays, RPMI was replaced with D-MEM medium (contains 1.9 mM Ca2+) without FCS and the cells were allowed to rest in D-MEM for 1 hour at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere16. J774A.1 cells (106) were incubated in D-MEM with 1 μg/ml of CyaA variants for 30 minutes at 4 °C, prior to removal of unbound toxin by three washes in D-MEM. After the transfer to the fresh tube, the cells were lyzed with 0.1% Triton X-100 for determination of cell-bound AC enzyme activity. For intracellular cAMP assays, 2 × 105 cells were incubated at 37 °C with CyaA for 30 minutes in D-MEM, the reaction was stopped by addition of 0.2% Tween-20 in 100 mM HCl, samples were boiled for 15 minutes at 100 °C, neutralized by addition of 150 mM unbuffered imidazole and cAMP was measured by a competitive immunoassay3. Activity of intact CyaA was taken as 100%.
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis
The CyaA proteins were dissolved in 100 mM 4-ethyl morpholine (pH 8.3) to reach 4 M concentration of urea and digested with trypsin (Promega, modified sequencing grade) at a trypsin:protein ratio of 1:50 for 6 hours at 30 °C. Then the 2nd portion of trypsin was added to a final ratio of trypsin:protein of 1:25 and the reaction was carried out for another 6 hours at 30 °C. When the reaction was complete, the concentration of the resulting peptides was adjusted by 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to 0.1 mg/ml and 3 µl of the sample were injected into the LC-MS system. The LC separation was performed using a desalting column (ZORBAX C18 SB-300, 0.1 × 2 mm) at a flow rate of 40 µl/min (Shimadzu) of 0.1% FA and a separation column (ZORBAX C18 SB-300, 0.2 × 150 mm) at a flow rate of 10 µl/min (Agilent 1200) of water/acetonitrile (MeCN) (Merck) gradient: 0-1 minute 0.2% formic acid (FA), 5% MeCN; 5 minutes 0.2% FA, 10% MeCN; 35 minutes 0.2% FA, 50% MeCN; 40 minutes 0.2% FA, 95% MeCN; 40–45 minutes 0.2% FA, 95% MeCN. A capillary column was directly connected to a mass analyzer. The MS analysis was performed on a commercial solariX XR FTMS instrument equipped with a 15 T superconducting magnet and a Dual II ESI/MALDI ion source (Bruker Daltonics). Mass spectra of the CyaA samples were obtained in the positive ion mode within an m/z range of 250-3000. The accumulation time was set at 0.2 s, LC acquisition was 45 minutes with 5 minutes delay and one spectrum consisted of accumulation of four experiments. The instrument was externally calibrated using Agilent tuning mix, which results in typical mass accuracy below 2 ppm. After the analysis the spectra were processed using DA 4.4 software package (Bruker Daltonics).
Lipid bilayer experiments
Measurements on planar lipid bilayers (black lipid membranes) were performed in Teflon cells separated by a diaphragm with a circular hole (diameter 0.5 mm) bearing the membrane. The CyaA toxin was diluted in 8 M urea, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and added into the grounded cis compartment with a positive potential. The membrane was formed by the painting method using soybean lecithin in n-decane–butanol (9:1, vol/vol). Both compartments contained 150 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and 2 mM CaCl2, the temperature was 25 °C. The membrane current was registered by Ag/AgCl electrodes (Theta) with salt bridges (applied voltage, 50 mV), amplified by an LCA-200-100G amplifier (Femto), and digitized by use of a KPCI-3108 card (Keithly). For lifetime determination, approximately 700 of individual pore openings were recorded and the dwell times were determined using QuB software with 10 Hz low-pass filter. The kernel density estimation fitted with a double-exponential function using Gnuplot software. The relevant model was selected by the χ2 value. We show only lifetime > 500 ms (shorter lifetime is not essential for overall membrane activity). The error estimates of lifetimes were obtained by the bootstrap analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post-test, comparing all the samples with the control. GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software) was used to perform statistical analysis. Significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was supported by grants 16-05919S (JM), GA15-09157S (RO), GA15-11851S (LB) and GA13-14547S (PS) from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, by project UNCE204025/2012 of the Charles University in Prague (AO), by projects LM2015064 (RO), LD15089 (PN) and LQ1604 (PN) from Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, by the “Modernization and support the research activities of the national infrastructure for translational medicine EATRIS-CZ” project (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001818) funded by Operational Programme Research, Development and Education, by institutional support from RVO 61388971 and by European Regional Development Funds (CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109 BIOCEV). We thank Hana Lukeova, Sona Kozubova and Iva Marsikova for excellent technical help. Jana Roderova is a doctoral student of the University of Chemistry and Technology.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cytotoxic activity of Kingella kingae RtxA toxin depends on post-translational acylation of lysine residues and cholesterol binding
Emerging Microbes & Infections (2018)