Article | Open

Giant modulation of the electronic band gap of carbon nanotubes by dielectric screening

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 8828 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09372-1
  • Download Citation
Published online:


Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are a promising material for high-performance electronics beyond silicon. But unlike silicon, the nature of the transport band gap in CNTs is not fully understood. The transport gap in CNTs is predicted to be strongly driven by electron-electron (e-e) interactions and correlations, even at room temperature. Here, we use dielectric liquids to screen e-e interactions in individual suspended ultra-clean CNTs. Using multiple techniques, the transport gap is measured as dielectric screening is increased. Changing the dielectric environment from air to isopropanol, we observe a 25% reduction in the transport gap of semiconducting CNTs, and a 32% reduction in the band gap of narrow-gap CNTs. Additional measurements are reported in dielectric oils. Our results elucidate the nature of the transport gap in CNTs, and show that dielectric environment offers a mechanism for significant control over the transport band gap.


Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are a promising platform to move integrated-circuit technology beyond the current limits of silicon1,2,3. However, there are critical open questions regarding the nature of the transport band gap in CNTs, and in particular the role that electron-electron (e-e) interactions may play in determining this band gap. In quantum transport experiments4, e-e interactions lead to phenomenon such as Luttinger liquid physics5, 6 and Wigner crystal formation in CNTs7, 8, and may also explain anomalous spin-orbit coupling in CNTs9, and anomalous band gaps in nominally-metallic CNTs10. Beyond this low-energy physics typically observed at cryogenic temperatures, theoretical models suggest that e-e interactions play a significant role in nanotube electronic properties even at room temperature. A giant renormalization of the single-particle gap (the transport gap) is predicted. The key experimental signature of this effect is the relationship between the transport gap and the dielectric environment (Fig. 1)11.

Figure 1
Figure 1

(a) Theoretical calculation of the enhancement of the transport gap, E g/E g,bare, as a function of the effective dielectric constant, ϵ eff , for a narrow-gap with chiral index (24, 0) and semiconducting CNT with chiral index (25, 0), both have diameter D 2 nm. In experiment, ϵ eff is controlled by the dielectric environment. The transport gap calculation is based on a Hartree-Fock self-consistent field calculation that incorporates π-band screening using the static random phase approximation11, 12, and includes a contribution due to curvature (see Eqn. 2). Similar enhancement factors are found when D 1 nm (see Supporting Information). (b) Electron microscopy image of the device structure. The source and drain electrodes are separated by 2 μm. The scale bar is 1 μm. Catalyst is deposited on top of the electrodes (4-μm square areas). The two gate electrodes at the bottom of the trench are separated by a 250 nm gap. The gate electrodes are electrically connected (off chip) and operated as a single gate. (c) A suspended CNT bridging the gap between source and drain electrodes. The scale bar is 1 μm.

A screening-dependent transport gap is particularly significant because a mutable gap would dramatically affect the design of nanoelectronic devices. For CNTs, there is preliminary experimental evidence that such an effect exists. A scanning tunneling microscopy study showed that a semiconducting CNT in direct contact with the metal substrate had a 25% smaller transport gap than a similar CNT that, by chance, was positioned a few angstroms above the metal substrate13. In other experiments, the I-V curves of pn junctions made from semiconducting CNTs have been interpreted within a framework of band gap renormalization and used to study doping-dependent band gap shrinkage14,15,16. Screening-induced changes in transport gap have been confirmed in other low-dimensional nanomaterials. Recent experiments showed that single-layer MoSe2 samples prepared on graphite had 11% smaller single-particle gap than single-layer MoSe2 prepared on bilayer graphene17. In our current work, we vary dielectric environment to demonstrate changes in the CNT transport gap greater than 30%, an extraordinarily large effect.

A theoretical framework for understanding the influence of dielectric environment on the transport gap of semiconducting CNTs was first developed by Ando11. This framework begins with the non-interacting model for CNT band structure4, in which the “bare” transport gap of semiconducting CNTs is given by

E g , bare 0.7eVnm/D,

where D is CNT diameter. Ando predicted that this bare transport gap is enhanced by a factor of ~2 when e-e interactions are considered. The enhancement factor depends on the dielectric constant of environment surrounding the CNT, as illustrated in Fig. 1a. Ando predicted that the screening dependence of the renormalized gap, Eg, would not be revealed by single-photon optical absorption/emission resonances because exciton binding energy also changes with dielectric screening. While Ando’s theory describing Eg in semiconducting CNTs has been corroborated by additional theoretical work18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, experimental verification of the relationship between Eg and dielectric environment has remained lacking.

In this work we also investigate the transport gap in narrow-gap CNTs (often called “metallic” CNTs). Carbon nanotubes that are considered metallic based on a simple zone-folding approximation have a small curvature-induced gap. Without considering e-e interactions, the bare curvature-induced transport gap is calculated to be4,

E g , bare (50meV nm 2 / D 2 )cos3θ,

where θ is chiral angle. We have extended Ando’s theory to predict the enhancement of this curvature-induced transport gap in narrow-gap CNTs (Fig. 1a).

To test the predicted relationships between Eg and dielectric environment we developed in-situ methods to measure individual narrow-gap and semiconducting CNTs in various dielectric environments. Using individual ultra-clean suspended CNTs (Fig. 1b and c), we perform measurements before and after submersion in dielectric liquids. Multiple techniques were used to determine the modulation of the band gap and demonstrate the extraordinary sensitivity of CNTs to dielectric screening.


Ultra-clean suspended CNTs were fabricated by growing CNTs over pre-made electrode structures26. Details of the device fabrication are given in the methods section. Because CNT growth is the final fabrication step, the CNTs are never exposed to fabrication chemicals, thereby retaining pristine material qualities. After post-selection for CNTs with good electrical conductivity, we have counted 110 narrow-gap CNTs and 187 semiconducting (wide-gap) CNTs over the last 3 years of experiments. Figure 1c shows a completed device.

Figure 2a shows the measurement circuit that was used to characterize transport properties in different dielectric environments. The gate electrodes are held at potential, Vg, relative to the drain electrode. The CNT is p-doped when Vg < 0 and n-doped when Vg > 0. Figure 2b shows an electrostatics simulation, and self-consistent band-bending diagram for a semiconducting CNT gated with Vg = 3 V. The source-drain bias is held constant, Vsd = 25 mV, and the current I is recorded with a low noise current preamplifier (SRS 570). The conductance of the CNT is G = I/Vsd.

Figure 2
Figure 2

(a) Schematic of a CNT field-effect transistor in air and oil environments. (b) Self-consistent electrostatics calculation of a wide-gap CNT device with E g = 0.6 eV, V g = 3 V and an air environment. Top: energy band profile along the CNT. Bottom: spatial map of the electrostatic potential Ф(x, z). (c) Conductance of a narrow-gap CNT in air and oil environments. (d) Conductance of a wide-gap CNT in air and oil environments.

Figure 2c and d show measurements of G at room temperature as a function of Vg, for a narrow-gap CNT and semiconducting CNT, respectively. The G(Vg) curves were first measured in air. The devices were then submerged in refractive index oil (n = 1.46, Cargille) and measured again. This measurement has been repeated on 4 additional narrow-gap CNTs, and 6 additional wide-gap CNTs. In the narrow-gap CNTs, the oil environment reproducibly increases G and the maximum value of the normalized transconductance, where normalized transconductance is defined as dG/dVg. In the semiconducting CNTs, there is no conductance at Vg > 0, due to the Schottky barriers for n-type transport (see the band bending diagram in Fig. 2b, and device simulations in the Supporting Information). When Vg < 0 the conductance turns on very abruptly, both in air and oil environment.

We first comment on the increase in peak transconductance in narrow-gap CNTs. When the device is submerged in oil, the oil increases the capacitive coupling between the back gate and the CNT. This increased gate capacitance means that more charge carriers are pulled into the CNT for a given Vg, consistent with our observations.

The increase in transconductance is one of several observations showing that the dielectric liquid does not introduce electrostatic disorder along the length of the CNT. Electrostatic disorder was a confounding factor in previous attempts to manipulate the dielectric environment of electrically-contacted CNTs. For example, Amer et al. compared pairs of CNT devices made from a single narrow-gap CNT, with the CNT either suspended or touching a SiO2 substrate27. In these experiments with a solid dielectric material, the dielectric caused a reduction in transconductance; the high conductance wings in the G(Vg) curve were suppressed, and the low-conductance dip was raised. This flattening of the G(Vg) curve was a clear signature of electrostatic disorder. In contrast, when liquid is added to narrow-gap devices, the transconductance is increased (Fig. 2c). We also note the sharp turn-on observed in semiconducting CNT devices both before and after submersion in liquid (Fig. 2d). There is no evidence that the liquid causes a disorder tail in the transistor curve. This is a key insight. Dielectric liquids unlock the possibility of exploring the effect of dielectric screening without the complicating factor of electrostatic disorder.

The remainder of this paper focuses on quantifying the environmentally-induced change in Eg in both narrow-gap and semiconducting CNTs.

We first discuss the effect of dielectric liquids on narrow-gap CNTs. The overall change in G (Fig. 2c) suggests either a change in Eg, or a change in the work function of the metal electrode. We first discuss the role of the metal work function and eliminate the possibility that a change in work function can explain Fig. 2c.

We investigated the influence of the metal work function on device characteristics by modifying the surface adsorbates on the metal electrodes. Derycke et al. showed that a vacuum environment (clean metal surfaces) favors alignment between the metal’s Fermi level and the conduction band of the CNT. In contrast, an ambient environment (water and oxygen adsorbates) favors alignment between the metal’s Fermi level and the valence band of the CNT28. Figure 3 shows R(Vg) curves that were obtained as a narrow gap CNT is brought from a vacuum environment into an ambient environment. In vacuum, the n-type resistance is lower than the p-type resistance, consistent with Fermi level alignment with the conduction band. After exposure to ambient environment, the p-type resistance is lower than n-type resistance. The biggest resistance peak is obtained while the device is transitioning from the vacuum to the ambient environment and R(Vg) is perfectly symmetric (purple curve). While the R(Vg) curve is clearly affected by metal work function (red, purple and black curves), submerging the device in oil (gray curve) has a much larger effect than can be explained by changes in the metal work function. We conclude that changes in metal work function can vary the resistance peak by ± 10%, but cannot explain the dramatic reduction in resistance caused by the oil environment.

Figure 3
Figure 3

The resistance of a narrow-gap CNT measured with different band alignment conditions (red, purple and black curves) and the same CNT measured in refractive index oil (dashed gray curve). Further analysis of this device (Device #4) appears in Fig. 5b.

To quantify Eg before and after submersion in oil, we require a transport model that relates the R(Vg) curve to Eg. We have taken an empirical approach to establishing such a relationship. We performed Coulomb blockade spectroscopy measurements to determine Eg for a set of 10 narrow-gap CNT devices. For each device we also measured R(Vg) at room temperature. From this data set we find a strong correlation between Eg and the room temperature R(Vg), as described below.

Coulomb blockade spectroscopy was performed in a vacuum environment at T = 2 K. The transport gap is resolved by measuring I while varying Vsd and Vg, as shown in Fig. 4a and c. Figure 4b and d show the corresponding room-temperature measurements of R(Vg) (air environment). The resistance peak is quantified using the parameter ΔR = Rpeak − Rc, where Rc is the contact resistance of the device. The contact resistance is determined by extrapolating the wings of the R(Vg) curve, which asymptotically approach Rc in an exponential fashion (see SI).

Figure 4
Figure 4

Low-temperature and room-temperature transport for two narrow-gap devices. (a) and (c) show Coulomb blockade spectroscopy taken at T = 2 K. The lines follow the edges of the 0th diamond and are extrapolated to determine the band gap. (b) and (d) show room temperature resistance as a function of gate voltage.

Measurements of Eg and ΔR from 10 different narrow-gap CNTs are summarized in Fig. 5a. A linear regression of ln(ΔR) vs. Eg yields

E g = [ 58.9 meV ] ln ( Δ R [ 13.3 k Ω ] ) .
Figure 5
Figure 5

(a) Summary of ΔR and E g values for 10 different narrow-gap CNT devices. The source-drain separation distance, L, varies from 300 nm to 2000 nm. (b) The transport gap, E g, measured before and after submersion in refractive index oil (RIO), machine pump oil (MPO), and pure isopropanol (IPA). E g is calculated from Eq. 3 using measurements of ΔR. The devices are different from those presented in Fig. 5a, and all have L = 2 μm, except for device 9 which has L = 1.5 μm. The estimated experimental error in determination of E g is ± 5%.

If ΔR measurements are used to estimate Eg (using equation 3), the average residual error is 13 meV.

Surprisingly, our empirical fit is not improved by accounting for the length of the CNT channel. The depleted segment of the CNT can be described using the one-dimensional Landauer formula with transmission coefficient ≈1 for carriers with energy above/below the band edges and zero transmission otherwise. In this approximation, the depleted section of CNT is an energy barrier that can only be crossed by thermal activation. The resistance of such a system is independent of barrier length if the barrier length is shorter than the carrier mean-free path. This explanation for weak length-dependence is consistent with previous work showing carrier mean-free paths are hundreds of nanometers in suspended CNTs29.

Using Eq. 3 we quantify the reduction in Eg when narrow-gap CNTs are submerged in refractive index oil, isopropanol, and machine pump oil (Hyvac, P8900-1) (Fig. 5b). The average reduction in Eg is 39% for refractive index oil, 32% for isopropanol and 28% for machine pump oil.

We now turn to semiconducting CNTs for which Eg kBT. In these devices the peak resistance in the R(Vg) curve is too large to measure, therefore, Eg cannot be quantified using Equation 1. We adopt a different approach. To determine Eg in the dielectric liquid, we take inspiration from previous work on liquid-gated CNTs30 and liquid-gated WSe2 devices31. We use a conducting liquid to gate our devices and determine the gate-voltage window where the CNT is depleted of charge carriers. This gate voltage window is then equated to Eg. The liquid gate medium is chosen to ensure that (1) The capacitive coupling between CNT and the gate is very strong, and (2) The Schottky barriers are sufficiently thin that the onset of p-type and n-type doping is observable. To determine Eg in air we utilize chiral index identification and literature values for the lowest optical resonance and the exciton binding energy, Eb.

Measurements of a semiconducting CNT are illustrated in Fig. 6. We first determine the chiral index of the CNT by measuring the photocurrent spectrum in air (Fig. 6a and b)32. From the photocurrent spectrum we identify the exciton resonances and compare to the exciton resonances listed in the CNT atlas33. We find excellent agreement between our measured resonances and the expected resonances for chiral index (20, 18). From the chiral index we know that the lowest energy exciton resonance (in air) is 400 meV33. We can also estimate the exciton binding energy, Eb = 130 meV, based on the results of two-photon optical characterization of chirality-enriched CNT films34. These two-photon experiments were performed in a dielectric environment, εenv ~ 3, therefore 130 meV is a lower bound for Eb in air. We conclude that Eg,air > 0.53 eV.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Method of measuring the change in transport gap for wide-gap CNTs. (a) Schematic of the photocurrent spectroscopy measurement that is used to determine chiral index. (b) The spectral dependence of the photocurrent (red line) plotted together with the expected absorption cross section of a (20,18) CNT. (c) Schematic of a liquid-gating measurement. (d) I sd − V g in pure IPA (gray line) and salty IPA, 30 mM of TBAF, (red line). Inset: Log plot of the sub-threshold region using salted IPA.

Next, the CNT is submerged in isopropanol and we measure G(Vg). The gate voltage is applied to the liquid, rather than to underlying gate electrode. We are careful to minimize leakage currents between the liquid and the source/drain electrodes (see Methods). Isopropanol is used for the liquid dielectric, rather than oil, because ionic species can be dissolved in the isopropanol. Dissolved ions are critical for increasing the gate capacitance, and shrinking the length of the Schottky barriers31. Tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) is used as the dissolved ionic salt. The liquid potential is measured by an independent electrode via a high-impedance voltmeter (see Methods)31. The light grey curve in Fig. 6d is measured in pure isopropanol and the red curve is measured in salted isopropanol (30 mM TBAF).

To verify that the Schottky barriers are sufficiently transparent, and the liquid gate capacitance is sufficiently strong, we measure the sub-threshold slope of the G(Vg) curve (see inset to Fig. 6d). In pure isopropanol we observe a sub-threshold swing ~120 mV/dec. In salted isopropanol the sub-threshold swing is 60 mV/dec, the lowest possible value. A sub-threshold swing of 60 mV/dec indicates that the capacitance between the liquid gate and the CNT greatly exceeds the quantum capacitance of ~0.4 fF/μm30. In this high-gate-capacitance regime, there is a one-to-one relationship between the eVg and the Fermi energy in the CNT when the Fermi energy is within the transport gap.

The transport gap is determined by extrapolating the linear regions of the G(Vg) curve to the Vg axis31. The x-intercepts define a gate-voltage window of 0.42 V, suggesting that Eg = 0.42 eV. We conclude that the isopropanol environment reduces Eg from > 0.53 eV to 0.42 eV. We repeated this experiment on two additional wide-gap CNTs (see Table 1). The average reduction from the lower bound value of Eg,air, to Eg,ipa is 25%.

Table 1: Modifying the transport gap of wide-gap CNTs. The transport gap was first characterized in air, E g,air, and then in isopropanol, E g,ipa. All devices have L = 2 μm.


Our experiments in which the environment is changed from air and isopropanol reveal a 25% reduction in Eg for semiconducting CNTs and a 32% reduction in Eg for narrow-gap CNTs. Comparing these percentages to theory (Fig. 1a), our observations are consistent with ϵ eff increasing from about 2 ϵ 0 to 5 ϵ 0 . These values of ϵ eff can be understood as follows. In the air environment, there is a small amount of screening from the CNT lattice (here, CNT lattice refers to everything except the π-band electrons). Previous authors have estimated ϵ eff ~ 2 ϵ 0 for a CNT surrounded by air or vacuum20. In the isopropanol environment, additional screening comes from the dielectric liquid. The dielectric response of isopropanol is frequency dependent. At low frequency, ϵ env  = 18 ϵ 0 and at high frequencies (visible light) ϵ env  = 1.9 ϵ 0 . The relevant frequencies for screening e-e interactions that contribute band gap renormalization are currently unknown. Important frequencies may include the electron tunneling rates at the source and drain contacts, and the characteristic frequencies of electron motion that range from vF/L to vF/D, where vF is the Fermi velocity. Our measurements in the isopropanol environment are consistent with this intermediate frequency range for dielectric screening (above dc, but below visible frequencies).

Other authors have performed theoretical calculations of band gap renormalization for semiconducting CNT in specific situations. For example, Spataru calculated the CNT transport gap as a function of distance from a metal surface24, and Lanzillo et al. calculated the effect of a boron-nitride substrate on the CNT transport gap25. Neither of these calculations is directly applicable to our experimental geometry, however, the magnitudes of the predicted band gap changes (hundreds of meV) are consistent with our experiments.

Our band gap renormalization calculations (Fig. 1a) and our experiments both suggest that e-e interactions have a larger effect on narrow-gap CNTs than semiconducting CNTs. The renormalized band gap can be written as Eg = Eg,bare + Σ, where Σ describes the contribution of e-e interactions (the self energy). The two CNTs featured in Fig. 1a have Eg,bare = 350 meV (semiconducting) and Eg,bare = 25 meV (narrow gap). When ϵ eff ~ 2 ϵ 0 , the self energies are Σ = 310 meV (semiconducting) and Σ = 60 meV (narrow gap). The different values of Σ reflect the effectiveness of screening by π-band electrons in the 2-nm-diameter semiconducting CNT compared to the 2-nm-diameter narrow-gap CNT. Despite the expected additional screening in the narrow-gap CNT, the enhancement factor, (Eg,bare + Σ)/Eg,bare, is larger due to the small value of Eg,bare. We emphasize the unique difference between semiconducting CNTs and so-called metallic (narrow-gap) CNTs. In semiconducting CNTs, both Eg,bare (see Eq. 1) and Σ scale as 1/D. For such CNTs, band gap enhancement is large and almost insensitive to D. In narrow-gap CNTs, Eg,bare scales as 1/D2 (see Eq. 2) and Σ scales in a complicated fashion due to the diameter-dependent ratio between Coulomb energy, ~ e2/ ϵ eff D, and kinetic energy ~ Eg. The net result is that band gap enhancement is even larger in narrow-gap CNTs (assuming experimentally accessible diameters). Our calculations give important new insights beyond previous work that focused exclusively on band gap renormalization in semiconducting CNTs.

The transport gap, Eg, includes a Coulomb charging energy component, e2/Ctot, where Ctot is the total capacitance between the CNT and the nearby metal electrodes (source, drain, and gate). This charging energy is reduced when a suspended CNT device is submerged in dielectric liquid. Total capacitance is proportional ϵ env , therefore, submersion in oil will cause approximately 3-fold increase in Ctot, due to the increase in ϵ env . It is important to consider whether the resulting decrease in Coulomb charging energy can account for the observed decrease in Eg. Coulomb blockade spectroscopy measurements reveal that the typical charging energy for our CNTs is no more than 15 meV (see Fig. 4 and Supporting Information). If the only effect of oil submersion was a 3-fold reduction in charging energy, a narrow-gap CNT with Eg = 200 meV in air would be expected to reach Eg = 190 meV in oil. Figure 5b shows that the experimentally observed changes in Eg are much larger. Therefore, the observed reduction in Eg cannot be explained by a simple change in charging energy.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated the experimental ability to tune the e-e interaction strength in CNTs while simultaneously monitoring transport properties. The effect of e-e interactions on the transport gap is remarkably large, verifying a long-standing theoretical prediction for semiconducting CNTs. We have extended this theoretical picture to narrow-gap CNTs and experimentally demonstrate an even larger effect narrow-gap CNTs. While it is well known that CNT transport properties are exquisitely sensitive to structural variables (i.e. diameter and chiral index), our work shows that CNTs are also extremely sensitive to dielectric screening. Knowledge of this environmental sensitivity is critical for rational design of CNT devices. The strongly-interacting electron physics governing this transport gap enhancement likely affects other low-dimensional systems that are currently under investigation35, 36.


Device Fabrication

Devices with a 2-μm source-drain separation were fabricated on 4-inch Si/SiO2 wafers (500 nm oxide layer) on which gate electrodes were patterned and deposited (W/Pt 5 nm/60 nm). A layer of SiO2 (800 nm thickness) was used to bury the gates. The source and drain electrodes were then patterned and deposited (W/Pt 5 nm/60 nm). Reactive ion etching was used to dig a trench between the source and drain electrodes. The Pt electrodes define the edge of the trench. CNT growth catalyst (1 nm Ti/20 nm SiO2/1 nm Fe) was deposited on top of the source and drain electrodes. CNTs were grown using chemical vapor deposition in a tube furnace at 800 C. The chips were shuttled in to avoid electrode degradation. The growth recipe consists of a 1 minute 1 SLM H2 anneal followed by a 5 minute growth phase with 0.15 SLM ethanol, 0.3 SLM methanol, and 0.45 SLM H2. The ethanol and methanol are introduced into Ar gas with a bubbler. Our process routinely yields ~10 CNT devices per die. Devices with source-drain separation L = 0.3 μm, 0.7 μm, and 1.5 μm were fabricated in a similar fashion, as described in ref. 37.

Liquid gate measurements

For liquid gate measurements, the appropriate ionic concentration of TBAF was determined by measuring the sub-threshold slope of the CNT FET at various TBAF concentrations, as discussed in Supplementary Note 3.

Electrical contact to the source and drain contacts on the CNT chip is made via parylene-c-coated tungsten probe needles (Microprobes for Life Science) that are positioned using x-y-z micromanipulators. The shaft of the probe needle is coated in a 3-micron-thick insulating layer of parylene-c. The insulating coating minimizes Faradaic leakage current between the source electrode, drain electrode and liquid. Only the tip of the metal needle (~500 μm2) contacts the liquid. Voltage is applied to the liquid using a bare tungsten needle, V g,app. A second bare tungsten needle is used to measure the liquid potential, V g,meas using a voltmeter with 10 GΩ input resistance. The measurement geometry is illustrated in Fig. S16. Quantification of Faradaic currents, and the relationship between Vg,meas and Vg,app is discussed in Supplementary Note 3.

Numerical simulations

The band profile of the CNT FET in Fig. 2b is calculated by first solving the 2D Laplace equation without the presence of the CNT. Then, the charge density profile along the CNT is computed by means of a self-consistent cycle. Details of the computation are given in Supplementary Note 4.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

Associated Content

Coulomb blockade data and analysis methods used to create Fig. 5a. Determining the room-temperature contact resistance, Rc, for narrow gap CNT devices. Liquid gate methods and control experiments. Liquid gate data for devices 13 and 14. Details of self-consistent electrostatics simulations (Fig. 2b). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Shulaker, M. M. et al. Carbon nanotube computer. Nature 501, 526–530 (2013).

  2. 2.

    Franklin, A. D. Electronics: The road to carbon nanotube transistors. Nature 498, 443–444 (2013).

  3. 3.

    Cao, Q. et al. End-bonded contacts for carbon nanotube transistors with low, size-independent resistance. Science 350, 68–72 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Laird, E. A. et al. Quantum transport in carbon nanotubes. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 703–764 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Bockrath, M. W. et al. Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes. Nature 397, 598–601 (1999).

  6. 6.

    Shi, Z. et al. Observation of a Luttinger-liquid plasmon in metallic single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat. Photonics 9, 515–519 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Pecker, S. et al. Observation and spectroscopy of a two-electron Wigner molecule in an ultraclean carbon nanotube. Nat. Phys. 9, 576–581 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Deshpande, V. V. & Bockrath, M. The One-Dimensional Wigner Crystal in Carbon Nanotubes. Nat. Phys. 4, 314–318 (2007).

  9. 9.

    Steele, G. A. et al. Large spin-orbit coupling in carbon nanotubes. Nat. Commun. 4, 1573 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Deshpande, V. V. et al. Mott Insulating State in Ultraclean Carbon Nanotubes. Science 323, 106–110 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Ando, T. Excitons in Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 66, 1066–1073 (1997).

  12. 12.

    Ando, T. Theory of electronic states and transport in carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 74, 777–817 (2005).

  13. 13.

    Lin, H. et al. Many-body effects in electronic bandgaps of carbon nanotubes measured by scanning tunnelling spectroscopy. Nat. Mater. 9(3), 235–238 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Lee, J. U. Band-gap renormalization in carbon nanotubes: Origin of the ideal diode behavior in carbon nanotube p-n structures. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 75, 75409 (2007).

  15. 15.

    Chang, S. W. et al. Nonideal diode behavior and bandgap renormalization in carbon nanotube p-n junctions. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 13, 41–45 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Comfort, E. & Lee, J. U. Large Bandgap Shrinkage from Doping and Dielectric Interface in Semiconducting Carbon Nanotubes. Sci. Rep. 6, 28520 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Ugeda, M. M. et al. Giant bandgap renormalization and excitonic effects in a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor. Nat. Mater. 13, 1091–1095 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Chang, E., Bussi, G., Ruini, A. & Molinari, E. Excitons in carbon nanotubes: An ab initia symmetry-based approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 196401–1 (2004).

  19. 19.

    Spataru, C. D., Ismail-Beigi, S., Benedict, L. X. & Louie, S. G. Excitonic Effects and Optical Spectra of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 77402 (2004).

  20. 20.

    Perebeinos, V., Tersoff, J. & Avouris, P. Scaling of excitons in carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 257402–1 (2004).

  21. 21.

    Zhao, H. & Mazumdar, S. Electron-electron interaction effects on the optical excitations of semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 157402 (2004).

  22. 22.

    Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Electron interactions and scaling relations for optical excitations in carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 197402 (2004).

  23. 23.

    Ando, T. Environment effects on excitons in semiconducting carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 79, 24706 (2010).

  24. 24.

    Spataru, C. D. Electronic and optical gap renormalization in carbon nanotubes near a metallic surface. Phys. Rev. B 88, 125412 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Lanzillo, N. A., Kharche, N. & Nayak, S. K. Substrate-induced Band Gap Renormalization in Semiconducting Carbon Nanotubes. Sci. Rep. 4, 3609 (2014).

  26. 26.

    Cao, J., Wang, Q., Rolandi, M. & Dai, H. Aharonov-Bohm interference and beating in single-walled Carbon-nanotube interferometers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 216803 (2004).

  27. 27.

    Amer, M. R., Bushmaker, A. & Cronin, S. B. The influence of substrate in determining the band gap of metallic carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 12, 4843–4847 (2012).

  28. 28.

    Derycke, V., Martel, R., Appenzeller, J. & Avouris, P. Controlling doping and carrier injection in carbon nanotube transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2773–2775 (2002).

  29. 29.

    Purewal, M. S. et al. Scaling of resistance and electron mean free path of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 186808 (2007).

  30. 30.

    Rosenblatt, S. et al. High Performance Electrolyte Gated Carbon Nanotube Transistors. Nano Lett. 2, 869–872 (2002).

  31. 31.

    Braga, D., Gutiérrez Lezama, I., Berger, H. & Morpurgo, A. F. Quantitative determination of the band gap of WS 2 with ambipolar ionic liquid-gated transistors. Nano Lett. 12, 5218–5223 (2012).

  32. 32.

    Aspitarte, L., McCulley, D. R. & Minot, E. D. Photocurrent Quantum Yield in Suspended Carbon Nanotube p-n Junctions. Nano Lett. 16, 5589–5593 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Liu, K. et al. An atlas of carbon nanotube optical transitions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 325–329 (2012).

  34. 34.

    Dukovic, G. et al. Structural dependence of excitonic optical transitions and band-gap energies in carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 5, 2314–2318 (2005).

  35. 35.

    Song, J. C. W., Shytov, A. V. & Levitov, L. S. Electron interactions and gap opening in graphene superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 1–5 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Jung, J., DaSilva, A., MacDonald, A. H. & Adam, S. Origin of band gaps in graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Commun. 6, 6308 (2014).

  37. 37.

    Schneider, B. H., Etaki, S., van der Zant, H. S. J. & Steele, G. A. Coupling carbon nanotube mechanics to a superconducting circuit. Sci. Rep. 2, 329–332 (2012).

Download references


This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1151369. A portion of device fabrication was carried out in the University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB) nanofabrication facility. JOI acknowledges support from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (FOM/NWO).

Author information


  1. Department of Physics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA

    • Lee Aspitarte
    • , Daniel R. McCulley
    •  & Ethan D. Minot
  2. Istituto Nanoscienze-CNR, Via Campi 213a, I-41125, Modena, Italy

    • Andrea Bertoni
    •  & Massimo Rontani
  3. Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Lorentzweg 1, Delft, 2628 CJ, The Netherlands

    • Joshua O. Island
    • , Marvin Ostermann
    •  & Gary A. Steele


  1. Search for Lee Aspitarte in:

  2. Search for Daniel R. McCulley in:

  3. Search for Andrea Bertoni in:

  4. Search for Joshua O. Island in:

  5. Search for Marvin Ostermann in:

  6. Search for Massimo Rontani in:

  7. Search for Gary A. Steele in:

  8. Search for Ethan D. Minot in:


L.A., D.R.M., G.A.S. and E.D.M. conceived and designed the experiments. L.A., D.R.M., J.O.I., and M.O. performed the experiments. A.B. performed device simulations. M.R. performed RPA-screened transport gap calculations. All authors contributed to the analysis and interpretation of results and preparation of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ethan D. Minot.

Electronic supplementary material


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit