Article | Open | Published:

Potential health risk of heavy metals in the leather manufacturing industries in Sialkot, Pakistan

Scientific Reportsvolume 7, Article number: 8848 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

This is a systematical report on the potential health risk of heavy metals from the leather industries in Pakistan based on multiple biological matrices of the exposed workers and indoor dust samples. The adverse impacts of heavy metals on the oxidative enzyme and their risks to workers’ health were also explored. Our results indicated that the level of Cr in indoor industrial dust was more than twice, compared to the background household dust. Blood, urine and hair samples of exposed workers showed significantly high concentrations of heavy metals, compared to those in the control group. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) level in the blood samples expressed significant positive correlation with Cr and Ni. Total hazard quotients (HQs)/hazard index (HI) were >1, and Cr (VI) exhibited higher cancer risks than that of Cd in the exposed workers. In addition, the PCA-MLR analysis confirmed that the industrial sections; cutting, shivering/crusting, and stitching were the principal contributors of heavy metals in the biological entities of the workers. Taken together, our results highlighted the occupationally exposed groups would likely to experience the potential health risks due to excessive exposure to the heavy metals from the leather industries.

Introduction

Leather industry has substantial economic importance; however, it faces more and more criticism because of the toxic waste emissions as a result of leather tanning and processing. Three types of wastes are generated by the leather industries: particulate matter dust (<10 µm), leather fibers (30–1200 µm) and effluents. The dust emitted from the processing of the leather contains 0.1–4.5% of Cr(III), which can cause severe health hazards to the exposed workers1, 2. Further, the effluents from the leather industries are ranked as the primary environmental pollutants, because they contain more than 40 different chemicals including heavy metals, acids, and dyes3, 4. Therefore, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) listed the wastes from leather industries as human carcinogens, and several studies reported the incidences of blood, bladder, colon, lung, nasal, paranasal sinuses, respiratory tract, and rectum cancers in the exposed workers2.

Among heavy metals, Cr is abundantly reported in the leather industries due to excessive use of Cr sulphate [Cr(H2O)5(OH)SO4] salts5, 6. Mutagenic properties of Cr depend on various factors such as oxidation states, bioavailability, bio-sorption, ligand mobility, and stability in the environment7. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and IARC had categorized Cr (VI) as a human carcinogen8, 9. Commercially, Cr is utilized in different occupational settings/industries such as leather tanning, metal finishing, pigment/dyes production, wood preservatives, corrosion inhibition, and glassware cleaning solutions7, 10, 11. In consequences, plenty of workers are exposed to Cr-borne fumes, dust, mist, and salts in different occupational settings on a daily basis globally as we have described in one of our previous study12.

Occupational exposure to heavy metals other than Cr can also cause enormous health impairments, such as asthma, back pains, bronchitis, chronic dermatitis, chromosomal abrasion, hypertension, hemoglobin changes, metabolic syndrome, DNA damage and even cancer13,14,15,16. Cd, Pb, and Ni have been classified as mutagenic to wildlife and humans17. Chronic exposure to toxic metals can increase the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the body, which lead to the induction of oxidative stress and cause substantial damage to the cellular components such as lipids, proteins, and DNA18. In response, cells naturally activate the immune system in the form of different antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH) and reduced glutathione (rGSH), etc. These antioxidants try to balance the oxidative stress and nullify the toxic impacts of heavy metals through synergistic actions19, 20.

Exposure to heavy metals in the leather industries has been implicated as the causative agent for many health hazards as documented by many authors in the past. For example, a cross-sectional survey from Kanpur, India have demonstrated the higher prevalence of medical complaints in the form of hand dermatitis, asthma, and low back trouble in the workers21. Rastogi et al. reported that the chronic exposure in the leather industries caused pulmonary disorders, such as asthma, chronic bronchitis, and pulmonary tuberculosis5. Khan et al. reported high disease incidences (skin allergies, bronchitis, and conjunctivitis) in 240 exposed workers in leather tanneries from Sialkot, Pakistan22. However, studies that probe the health hazards to the workers using multiple bio-matrices and indoor industrial dust are scarce. Recently, the indoor dust has been proved an excellent marker of indoor heavy metal exposure in the industrial and urban settings23, 24.

In biomonitoring studies, the urine and blood samples are widely used as conventional bio-matrices25. However, recent studies have mentioned the benefits of using the non-invasive bio-matrices (hairs and saliva) and drawbacks of relying on the classical fluids24, 25. Urine and blood samples mainly reflect the recent exposure, therefore, it is not a rationale to assess the chronic exposure to heavy metals using these two bio-matrices25. Hairs have higher metal bioaccumulation potential and reflect the past exposure of up to one year due to the slower growth rate (10 mm per month) and the ability of the metal cations to bind with the keratin proteins present in the hair matrix25. Moreover, hairs are an easily accessible stable matrix, which makes their collection, storage, and transportation easier26. Salvia is also readily collectible diagnostic material with easy accessibility25. Although researchers have mixed opinion about the use of saliva and hair samples for biomonitoring, we considered them as mandatory biomonitoring tools to reduce the biases among the bio-matrices and evaluate the contamination status via a holistic approach, which ultimately helped us to understand the fate and toxicokinetics of heavy metals in workers.

Sialkot is a populous city and highly prone to environmental pollution because of rapid growth in urban and industrial areas during the last decade27,28,29. This city is famous globally for its leather products, sports goods, and surgical instruments30. This is a systematical report from Sialkot on the transport and transformation of heavy metals in different biological and environmental matrices in the leather industries. The objectives of this study include: 1) to monitor toxic heavy metals with elicited concern of Cr in bio-matrices of the exposed workers and indoor industrial dust; 2) to investigate the impacts of industrial environmental contamination on the health status of workers based on cancer and non-cancers risk factors; 3) to investigate potential industrial sources of heavy metals and their percentage contribution in the bio-matrices of the exposed subjects based on PCA-MLR; 4) to measure oxidative stress induced by toxic metals; 5) to evaluate the relationship among heavy metals contamination in indoor industrial dust and bio-matrices of the exposed workers.

Materials and Methods

Ethical statement

All the experiments in this study fulfilled and confirmed the mandatory requirements as per the Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects31. Legal and ethical standards related to this study and experimental protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan. All of the participants were properly informed about the objectives of this study and only volunteers were selected for sampling after getting the informed consent from all the participants and the approval from the local authorities (Approval ID: 100450068).


Description of the sampling site and sampling of bio-matrices

Sialkot city is located between 32°24′N to 32°37′N latitude and 73°59′E to 75°02′E longitude. In Sialkot, the leather industries are concentrated in five main areas; most of them are located in suburban areas. North and Northwestern suburban side of the Sialkot have plenty of registered and unregistered leather industries. Some leather industries are also located within the city. One leather industry was selected from each hub. All the leather industries were given codes such as T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 (Fig. 1 ). In close proximity to this sampling area, there are two major canals of the Chenab River, which is a source of freshwater for the region. Therefore, the risk of heavy metal contamination to underground and surface water resources are higher. For biological samples, healthy workers (n = 47, age 20–50 years) were recruited voluntarily for urine, blood, hair and saliva samples. Before sampling, all participants were examined and workers with bleeding in mouth or tooth diseases were not sampled. Psychological and physical stability of the workers is of critical importance while selecting the workers for sampling. The control group (n = 14) was consist of the unexposed population from Cantonment area of Sialkot, with clean and hygienic environmental conditions. Further description of methods for sampling, sample preparation, and digestion of biological matrices and environmental samples are presented in the supporting information (Text S1). The details about the digestion conditions of biological and environmental samples are given in the Table S2.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Map of the study area (Sialkot, Pakistan) developed using Arc GIS 9.3 (ESRI, USA) software.


Estimation of heavy metals in dust and bio-matrices

Flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS) (Varian Spectra AA-240) was used to quantify the heavy metals (Cr, Cd, Ni, Cu, Mn, Fe, Pb, and Zn) in the dust and bio-matrices following the methods described somewhere25. Calibration of the instrument was performed using a separate set of standards for dust samples (3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 ppm) and bio-matrices (5, 2.5, 1.25, and 0.62 ppm). After calculation of the dilution factor, the heavy metal concentrations were presented with following units: µg/L for urine, blood, and saliva, mg/g for dust, and µg/g for hairs. The instrumental conditions of FAAS for measurement of the heavy metals are presented in the Table S3.


Quality assurance and quality control (QA and QC)

Strict compliance with quality assurance and quality control methods was implicated throughout sampling and analysis. All of the glasswares and containers were soaked in 10% HNO3 and then washed with distilled water and oven dried prior to use. Analytical grade (Merck, Germany) chemicals and reagents were used. For quality assurance (QA) of analytical methods reagent blanks and triplicate samples were analyzed to reduce the biases. The recoveries were calculated in the range of 84–105% for all the investigated metals (Table S3). Quality control (QC) was implicated through analyzing the certified reference material (CRM). Human saliva and urine CRMs were obtained from National Institute of Environmental Studies, Japan. CRM of whole blood was obtained from External Quality Assessment Scheme, Canada and CRM for hair was purchased from National Research Centre, Beijing, China. The details related LOQs, LODs, accuracy, precision, and recoveries of the investigated heavy metals are presented in the Table S3.


Heavy metals source apportionment in bio-matrices using PCA-MLR

Principal component analysis (PCA) is well-acknowledged source apportionment technique. However, it only provides qualitative information about the potential sources through principal components without interpreting the quantitative information. Principal component analysis-multiple linear regression (PCA-MLR) provides the quantitative information about the sources, which can help to disintegrate the overlapping components/sources. In this study, MLR analysis was applied between PCA scores and pollution index to elucidate the relationship among individual heavy metal sources to the rest of the potential heavy metal sources32. This PCA-MLR method was previously described by Thurston and Spengler33. The final percentage contributions of industrial sections were calculated using the following Eq. 1 devised by Wu et al.32.

$${\rm{Percentage}}\,{\rm{contribution}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{a}}\,{\rm{specific}}\,{\rm{section}},i=(\frac{{\rm{B}}i}{\sum Bi})\times 100$$
(1)

where Bi = regression coefficient for the specific factor (contribution of single industrial section) and \(\sum Bi\) is the sum of the all the regression coefficients (overall input through all the sections).


Human health risk calculation

Non-cancer health risk

The non-cancer health risks are defined as the risks of disease induction other than cancer due to excessive exposure to heavy metals23. In this study, non-cancer health risk was calculated by using methods described by USEPA9 and Qu et al.34. This method is based on metal’s average daily intake (ADI) by the workers through exposure to a specific medium (indoor dust in this study). The following Eq. 2 is used to calculate the ADI, which probes the time-based association between average doses of certain heavy metal to its exposure level.

$$ADI=\frac{C\times IR\times EF\times ED\,}{BW\times AT}$$
(2)

where ADI express the average daily intake/dose of heavy metal (mg/kg/day) via dust exposure through different routes (inhalation or ingestion); C is the chemical concentration of metal in the medium i.e. dust (mg/kg); IR is the rate of ingestion (kg/day); EF represent the frequency of exposure (day/year); ED stands for duration of exposure (years) to a specific medium; BW is the body weight (kg) of the worker; AT is the average time period. Further, the risk posed to the exposed workers was quantified as Hazard Quotient (HQ) using ADI values from Eq. 2. Finally, the HQs of heavy metals were calculated using following equation Eq. 3.

$$HQ=\frac{ADI}{RfD}$$
(3)

where ADI express heavy metal’s average daily intake (mg/kg/day) calculated using equation (1) and RfD represent the oral reference dose of certain metal extracted from the database and listed in Table S9. The HQ values <1 are considered as harmless with no/minimal risks to the health of the exposed worker with that exposure level to certain heavy metal, while the values of HQ > 1 portray possibility of serious health risks, which can lead to the induction of disease. Moreover, Hazard index (HI) was calculated by adding up HQs for all the investigated metals, which indicated overall potential high-end health risk rather than a low-end risk. In this study, ADI and HQs were calculated for all the workers and biases regarding risk calculations were removed by applying Monte Carlo simulation method with 10,000 iterations through Crystal Ball software (Oracle Corporation, Vallejo, USA).

Cancer risk

Cancer risk was computed only for Cr (VI) and Cd using the following Eq. 4. as described by Xu et al.35 and US EPA (US EPA, 2007).

$$CR=CSF\times C(\max )$$
(4)

where CR is the risk of cancer incidences and CSF is the cancer slope factor of the specific carcinogenic metals. The values used for cancer slope factor are provided in the Table S9.


Superoxide dismutase activity assay

SOD activity assay was used to quantify the oxidative stress mediated by heavy metals as described by Sun et al.36. Briefly, phosphate buffers with pH 7.8 and pH 7 were prepared. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Methionine, Nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (NBT) and Riboflavin solutions were prepared following the standard procedure. An aliquot of 0.1 mL blood was centrifuged at 1500–2000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. Reaction and reference mixtures were prepared following the same methods as mentioned above. Phosphate buffers and distilled water were used to prepared blanks. Afterward, the absorbance of the prepared samples and blanks was measured at 560 nm by using spectrophotometer Model DR5000 (HACH, USA). SOD activity was detected as reported by Beauchamp and Fridovich37.

Results and Discussion

Heavy metal concentrations and correlations in the biomatrices

The concentrations of heavy metals in the blood and urine samples of exposed worker and control group are presented in the Fig. 2. Cr levels in the urine and blood samples were reported higher in exposed workers as compared to that in the control group (5.16 µg/L vs. 4.47 µg/L in the urine and 8.39 µg/L vs. 5.48 µg/L in the blood). Similarly, the level of other heavy metals e.g. Fe (71.48 µg/L), Pb (119 µg/L), Mn (7.7 µg/L), Cd (9.0 µg/L), and Ni (4.18 µg/L) were also measured higher in the blood samples of the exposed group compared to that of the control group. Moreover, the heavy metals’ concentrations in saliva of the exposed workers e.g. Cr (0.93 µg/L), Cd (4.53 µg/L), Cu (2.49 µg/L), Fe (13.85 µg/L) and Pb (10.22 µg/L) were also reported higher to that of the control subjects. In the scalp hair samples, all of the metals (except Cr and Mn) showed higher concentrations than those reported in the auxiliary hairs within the exposed group. In the auxiliary hair samples, the concentrations of Cr, Cd, Fe, and Mn were lower in the workers compared to that of the controls. Spearman correlation coefficients of heavy metal concentrations in bio-matrices are presented in the Table S1. Cr exhibited significant positive correlation with Mn (r = 0.51) in the urine, with Pb (r = 0.58) and Cr (r = 0.48) in the blood, and with Cd (r = 0.34) in the hair samples. Cr in the saliva samples was also positively correlated with Ni (r = 0.28) and Cr (r = 0.62) in the urine, with Cr (r = 0.49), Ni (r = 0.28), and Fe (r = 0.34) in the blood. In the exposed workers, Pb content also revealed significant positive correlations, such as Pb in the blood with Mn in the urine (r = 0.27) and Cr in the blood (r = 0.28). The levels of Pb in the saliva samples of the workers were also positively correlated with Cd in the urine (r = 0.27) and blood samples (r = 0.32), and also with Zn (r = 0.33) and Mn (r = 0.34) in the blood samples. Moreover, PCA analysis also showed similar results as those determined by the correlation matrix. PCA didn’t explain the high variance of the metal content in the bio-matrices. For example, the heavy metal concentrations in the urine, blood, saliva and hair samples of the exposed vs. control groups as variables explained 54, 59, 56 and 58% variances in the cumulative metal exposure index. Factor loading variables of PCA are presented in the Table S4S8.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Heavy metal concentrations in the bio-matrices of exposed and control subjects in leather industries. Heavy metal concentrations in urine, blood, and saliva were measured in µg/L and in µg/g in hair samples.

Industrial sources of heavy metals

Workers were exposed to different levels of heavy metals in various sections of the leather industries via dust and fiber wastes. Therefore, to quantify the contribution of each of these sections in the heavy metal burden of the bio-matrices, we used a contemporary extended statistical technique known as PCA-MLR. The regression coefficients were computed among overall parameters (all the PCA axes were extracted from the purposed industrial sources, such as shivering/crusting, washing, cutting, stitching, and packing/finishing) and leave parameter (excluded PCA axis, such as shivering, washing, etc.) for the regression analysis. Regression analysis resulted in overall significantly higher coefficients (R 2 ≥ 0.87, 0.96) for blood and hair samples while lower for saliva and urine samples. The regression coefficients had the reliable competence between the predicted and measured values. Generally, regression values (R 2) higher than 0.75 are suitable for using this technique, which implied a good fit model among the measured and predicted heavy metal levels. The final percentage contribution of each source was calculated by using Eq. 1. As shown in the Fig. 3, pie charts were used to display the percentage contribution of five potential sources of heavy metal contamination of the bio-matrices in the exposed workers. The dust samples from shivering/crusting section showed the highest contribution of heavy metals in the saliva and urine samples (82% and 47%, respectively) while cutting section contributed 69% heavy metals in the blood samples and 56% in the hair samples. Stitching and washing section on average has the contribution of 3–29 and 10–15% in all bio-matrices, respectively, while packing and finishing sections of leather goods have a negligible contribution to heavy metal contamination of biological matrices.

Figure 3
Figure 3

PCA-MLR based percentage contributing sources for the contamination of heavy metals in different biological matrices of occupationally exposed workers in the leather industries of Sialkot, Pakistan.

Heavy metals mediated health risk assessment

Non-cancer risk

To specify the daily intake frequencies of the indoor industrial dust and related health risks, we calculated the chemical daily intake (CDI), hazard quotient (HQ), and hazard index (HI) of investigated heavy metals through the intake of indoor industrial dust by the exposed workers. The comparative results of ADI and HQ of the investigated metals for the exposed workers in five leather industries are presented in the Fig. 4. Oral reference dose (RfDs) of heavy metals used for the calculation of HQ are provided in the Table S9. Figure 5 indicated the cumulative probability distribution curves plotted by Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) based on the total hazard quotient values of five leather industries.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Health risk assessment associated with heavy metals intake through industrial dust exposure. (a) Average daily intake of metal (ADI), (b) hazard quotient (HQ) of heavy metals in the exposed workers from five different leather industries (T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5) of Sialkot, Pakistan. Note: HQ for Cr(VI) was reported highest among all the heavy metals in this study, due to large values of HQs for Cr(VI), they were not included in this chart to make this figure representable.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Cumulative Probability Distribution (CPD) of the total HQs in all five leather industries. The results for health risks to the exposed workers were validated using the Monte Carlo simulation based on crystal ball software (Oracle, USA) for 10,000 iterations.

The HQ values of Cr(III) for workers belong to all the investigated industries showed a narrow range and corresponding ADI values were also less than the respective RfD except in the leather industries T3 and T5, where ADIs of Cr(III) were 2–3 fold higher than the RfD. The mean highest HQ for Ni was measured in the workers of the leather industry T3 (12.08) with mean ADI of Ni at 0.24 mg/kg-d. However, the ADIs of Ni in the workers of the remaining industries were lower than the RfD. In the same leather industry (T3), the highest mean HQs for Cd and Fe were calculated as 7.68 and 5.02 and the ADIs were 0.008 and 0.077 mg/kg-d, respectively. Compared to RfDs, the ADIs for both of the metals were almost 7-8 fold higher. Pb revealed the highest mean HQ of 3.28 with an estimated ADI of 0.049 mg/kg-d, which was about 300 folds higher than that of Pb’s RfD (0.00014 mg/kg-d). The mean HQs for Zn, Mn, and Cu were 0.87, 3.29, and 4.96, and their ADIs were 0.26, 0.46, and 0.20 mg/kg-d, which were 2, 4, and 5 fold higher than the corresponding RfDs (Table S9). The mean HQ value of Cr(VI) was about 134.50 with the ADI value of 0.67 mg/kg-d, which was about 120 fold higher than that of the RfD for Cr(VI).

Cancer risk of Cr and Cd

The cancer risks of Cd and Cr in the exposed workers were calculated using the specifically devised cancer slope factor (CSF) values. The CSF values used in the current study are present in the Table S9. Cr expressed elevated cancer risks for the exposed workers compared to that of Cd (0.300 vs. 0.041), albeit Cd showed elevated risk than that of Cr (6.87 vs. 0.11) for non-cancer risk.

Heavy metals induce oxidative stress in the exposed workers

The SOD level in the exposed group was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that in the control group (Table 1). Correlation analysis indicated significant positive association (p ≤ 0.01) among SOD levels and concentrations Cd, Cr and Zn in the blood with the following order: Cr > Zn > Cd for most of the exposed workers. However, no significant association revealed between SOD concentration, age, and exposure duration for the workers, albeit control subjects implied significant positive correlation for these independent variables (p < 0.01). Moreover, adjusting the marital status, working time span, and smoking, the linear regression coefficients showed that SOD levels in blood were significantly dependent on Cr (r = 0.74), Cd (r = 0.92), and Zn (r = 0.88).

Table 1 SOD concentration (mean ± SD), correlation and regression analysis among the blood SOD levels, heavy metals, age and working exposure in the exposed groups and control.

Statistical evidence for the transfer of metals from dust to human body

To elucidate the impact of contaminated indoor industrial environment on the exposed workers, correlation analysis was conducted between the heavy metal footprints in the dust vs. those reported in the saliva and urine samples (relatively directly exposed excretory fluids). The results revealed that Cr exhibited a significant positive association between saliva and dust samples (r = 0.40), implying the transportation of Cr from indoor industrial dust to the saliva of the exposed workers through oral cavity (Table S10). The elevated concentrations of Cr in the dust samples also strongly affected other heavy metals, e.g. Cr in the dust samples was positively correlated with Cu in the saliva samples (r = 0.61). The level of Pb in the saliva and dust samples showed significant positive correlation (r = 0.57). The Cr concentrations in the urine samples were negatively correlated with Ni in the dust samples (r = −0.40). However, Ni concentration was lower than other metals. Cd in the urine samples and Mn in the dust samples showed a positive relationship with Ni (r = 0.60). Pb in the urine samples was also significantly linked with Fe (r = 0.40) and Ni (r = 0.49) in the dust matrix (Table S11).

Discussion

Occupational exposure to elevated levels of heavy metals, associated oxidative stress, and health risks in exposed workers have been reported previously in leather industries worldwide38,39,40,41,42. However, this is a robust study from Sialkot (the largest Asian exporter of leather products), which included simultaneous biomonitoring of eight heavy metals in five biomatrices, their industrial sources, associated oxidative stress, and health risks in exposed workers of the leather industries. This study discovered the elevated level of toxic heavy metals (Cr, Cd, Pb, and Ni) and compromised levels of essential metals (Zn, Mn, Fe, and Cu) in exposed workers, compared to that of the control group. The other three major findings reported in this study are: (1) Cr (VI) and Ni poses the alarming level of non-cancer health risks to the workers and carcinogenic risk of Cr was higher than that of Cd. Consistently, these two metals (Cr and Ni) induced highest levels of oxidative stress in the exposed workers; (2) shivering/crusting, cutting, and stitching of leather were identified as the primary sources of heavy metals responsible for contaminating the biological matrices of the exposed workers; (3) Cr, Ni, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Mn levels detected in biomatrices (saliva and urine) and industrial indoor dust revealed strong positively correlation, implying direct transportation of these metals from indoor industrial dust to the biological fluids of the exposed workers.

Blood and urine samples are known as the classical biomatrices because of their frequent use in biomonitoring studies and high acceptance among the scientific community25, 39. Among classical bio-matrices, an elevated level of heavy metal was reported in the blood samples, compared to the urine samples. The reason could be the reduction of heavy metals to less toxic metallic ions in the liver and excrete through urinary tract within 8 hours of ingestion12. While heavy metals retain their oxidation state intact in the blood regulatory system for longer period of time43. Generally, the elevated level of Cr in all the bio-matrices can be attributed to the excessive use of Cr sulphate salts [Cr(H2O)5(OH)SO4] in leather tanning2, 44. However, Cr levels measured in the urine and blood samples of the exposed workers in the current study were lower than those reported in the previous studies from China42 and India38 (Table 2). The concentrations of Cd and Ni in the blood samples were higher than those reported in the worker from Spain (5.61 µg/L and 4.66 µg/L, respectively)25. In this study, Mn has ~2 fold higher concentration in urine samples than that of workers from Heidelberg, Germany45. The general reason behind higher levels in the occupational setting of Pakistan and lower in developed countries could be the unhygienic working conditions and lack of protective measures in Pakistan46. Higher concentration of Pb in the blood samples of the exposed workers and controls may be attributed their exposure to Pb-smoke and low-grade diesel from the industries. Although Pakistan has banned Pb-fuel in 2002, previously deposited Pb in the environment may contribute to the current occupational exposures30. We also quantified the Pb content in the industrial effluents and sediments from nullahs in the city; the Pb concentrations were ranged 6.42–7.72 mg/L and 15.5–13.4 mg/kg, respectively (Fig. S1). Interestingly, the concentrations of Cu and Zn in blood samples of the control group were higher than those in the exposed workers. According to Fraga, the estimated average requirements (EARs) of Cu and Zn are 0.7 and 8.1 mg/day for a healthy human body, respectively. The adequate level of these metals is also essential for the natural defense against the xenobiotics in the human body47. Therefore, the lower concentration of essential elements in the exposed group may be an indication of oxidative stress that compromised the adequate levels of the trace elements.

Table 2 Concentration level of heavy metals in the biological matrices of workers in different occupational settings from published literature.

Saliva and hair samples are known as non-invasive biomatrices because of their infrequent use as biomonitoring tools and less acceptance, compared to the classical bio-matrices25, 39. Recently, the use of non-invasive bio-matrices have been increased significantly because of their potential to store higher metal content (hairs), the longer half-life of metal (hairs), higher willingness to donate samples, easy collection, and transportation25, 39. The concentration of metals in the saliva represent the recent, while in the hairs represent the long-term heavy metal exposure. In the current study, Cd, Mn and Pb concentration in the salivary samples were higher compared to the previous study25. While compared to our current findings, worker’s from Spain showed lower Cd level (0.07 µg/g) in the auxiliary hairs25. Overall, the heavy metals levels detected in the scalp hairs were higher than that of the auxiliary hair in the current study, and this might be an indication of external contamination in the scalp hairs as described previously in our study39 and by Gil et al.25. Hairs have an ability to accumulate 10-fold higher metal content than other bio-matrices25, 48. Therefore, hair samples expressed the highest concentration in the current study (Table 2). Moreover, the elevated metal content in the hair samples indicated the long-term occupational exposure to heavy metals25.

Cr is the primary metal of concern in leather industries, because it proved as one of the best leather tanning agent worldwide4. Albeit, abundance of Cr in the indoor industrial environment can cause serious health implications to the exposed workers because of its carcinogenic nature, and its capability to enter the body through various exposure pathways49. Cr belongs to the group of toxic metals, which has a small half-life in the soft tissues (blood and saliva) and readily excrete from the body through urination or reduction to the metabolites12. This might be the reason behind significant positive correlations among Cr and other metals in the soft tissues (urine, blood, and saliva) (Table S1). These positive correlations indicated the inter-matrices transportation of heavy metals in the exposed workers39. Moreover, heavy metals also have potential to transport between the body skeleton and blood, which is called “endogenous contamination”43, 50. Importantly, the Cr reduction metabolites have physiological resemblance with phosphate and sulfates, allowing their easy entry into the cells via non-specific anionic pathway and ultimately lead to the cellular DNA damage or failure of DNA replication51, 52.

Previous reports mentioned high possibility of endogenous contaminations for Cd and Pb because of their long half-lives in the human body, (10–40 years) and (2 months to 20 years), respectively43, 50. Therefore, the elevated contamination levels and significant correlations express by these metals in the current study may be due to the excessive use of these metals in insecticides, batteries, glazed pottery, fuels, PVC paints, plating, and smelting processes53, 54. Pb contamination in the tap water was also reported in the study area with an elevated level of 0.46 ppm, which was 46 fold higher than that of WHO permissible limits (0.01 ppm)29. Contrary to the classical biomatrices, the hair metal content failed to reveal significant correlations, but this is one of the suggested limitations of using hairs as biomonitoring tool55. The correlation analysis of metal concentration among hair samples and those in the blood or urine samples are not commonly used in occupational and general exposure assessments39. Because hair samples represent long-term, while blood/urine/saliva samples express recent heavy metals exposures, thus making it unlikely any obvious correlation exist among them. Taken together, elemental concentration (especially Cr, Pb, and Ni) expressed significant association with other heavy metals in different bio-matrices, except hairs. The differences among toxicokinetic properties of the bio-matrices may also account for the lack of correlations between hair and other bio-matrices56, 57.

On the basis of job function, the leather industries consist main five sections: washing, shivering/crusting, cutting, stitching, and packing/finishing in the leather industries2, 58. In agreement with our previous study on child labor39, the shivering or crusting section was the principal contributor of heavy metals in urine and saliva followed by cutting section in blood and hair samples of the exposed workers in the current study. The shivering/crusting sections of leather industry have different sub-sections, such as buffing, dyeing, sammying (drying), shaving, stuffing, softening, and washing of leather. Therefore, the shivering/crusting mostly produces gains/particulate fraction of leather dust. That’s why it was highly contaminated section of the leather industries, while cutting, stitching and packing sections were less polluted because they produce fiber waste.

The indoor dust from leather industries poses serious health risks to the exposed workers due to the excessive contamination of the heavy metals39. The fine fraction of the dust can transfer to the human body via different exposure pathways, such as ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact23, 24, 59. According to the health risk classification of the USEPA, when the HI value of heavy metal exposure is >1, the associated risk becomes higher. Consequently, in the longer run, the probability of disease induction also becomes higher in the exposed population60. Unfortunately, the mean HI values were >1 for all the investigated workers from different leather industries with the order of T3 > T2 > T4 > T5 > T1. Leather industry T3 was located relatively closer to the urban area, therefore, workers maybe intake the additional burden of heavy metals from non-point sources. Monte Carlo simulation model also confirmed these results with a higher probability of health risks induction in the workers belong to the leather industry T3 as compared to other industries. The elevated footprints of heavy metals in the indoor industrial dust can cause serious health risks to the exposed workers in the following order: Cr(VI) > Ni > Fe > Cd > Cu > Pb ≈ Mn > Cr(III) > Zn. Since Cr (VI) is mutagenic and carcinogenic in nature, the RfD values of Cr (VI) were low. Therefore, higher health risks were revealed to the exposed workers. These findings were consistent with the previous reports, highlighting the risks of indoor dust exposure in an urban area of Istanbul, Turkey23 and street dust from metals smelting district Huludao, China61. In this study, the HQ values of Pb were also higher than the threshold limits suggested by Agency for Toxic Substances Disease Registry (ATSDR)62. Cd also showed high HQ values for all the investigated workers. The previous report showed that Cd has a high bioaccumulation potential, specifically in the kidneys63. Flora and Pachauri reported that chronic exposure of Cd can cause prostate, lung, kidney and pancreatic cancer63, and such cases were reported previously in an industrial area of north-east Belgium64. The acceptable or tolerable threshold limit values for cancer risk is ranged from 1 × 10−6 to 1 × 10−4 (US EPA, 2001). In the current study, the Cr and Cd expressed the corresponding values for cancer risks of 3.4 × 10−1 and 3.9 × 10−2 in the workers, respectively. Unfortunately, these computed cancer risks were much higher than the acceptable limit values devised by USEPA.

Oxidative stress is induced by heavy metals through the unbalanced generation of ROS14, 65. ROS naturally fight against the xenobiotics in the body (heavy metals etc.) and are involved in the cell signaling pathways20. However, the excessive ROS can lead to inflammation, premature aging, atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes, and even cancer66. SOD, an antioxidant enzyme and an excellent biomarker for cellular oxidative stress, is the first and most critical line of the natural immune system against ROS. Besides assisting the body in the immune system, previous evidence showed that SOD enzyme was involved in various diseases, such as Down’s syndrome, Lou Gehrig’s disease and premature aging66, 67. For the exposed group, SOD activity was reported higher in the exposed group, albeit it didn’t reveal a significant association with exposure duration and age (p > 0.05) of the workers. Khan et al. and Hassan et al. also reported similar finding for the workers exposed at leather tanneries and gasoline stations, respectively22, 68. For the control group in this study, a significant positive correlation was found between SOD activity, the age of the worker, and working duration (p < 0.05). Similar findings were reported previously by Nielsen et al.69. Zn concentration in the blood samples showed a positive correlation and regression coefficient with levels of SOD activity. Interestingly, Zn also acts as an antioxidant to protect the cells from oxidative stress through activating the metallothionein enzyme (ROS inhibitor) and inactivating the NADPH enzyme activity (ROS generator)70. Thus, Zn may synergistically act with SOD to reduce the oxidative stress. Hence, our study revealed strong evidence related to the transportation of heavy metals from the dust to the worker’s body via various routes (Table S10 and S11), which was further confirmed by the elevated health risks and oxidative stress caused by heavy metals to the exposed workers at the leather industries in Sialkot, Pakistan.

Conclusion

This study concluded the increasing heavy metal pollution especially in the blood, urine, and hair samples of the exposed workers and indoor dust samples. The heavy metals Cr, Ni, Cd, and Pb were identified as the main culprits posing the highest health risks and inducing the oxidative stress in the workers. Shivering/crusting, cutting, and stitching of leather were highlighted as the highest heavy metals contributing sections in the bio-matrices of the exposed workers through ingestion of the contaminated dust. Further, this study concluded that the unsafe and unhygienic indoor environment contaminated with industrial dust make workers susceptible to high metal exposure.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Dixit, S., Yadav, A., Dwivedi, P. D. & Das, M. Toxic hazards of leather industry and technologies to combat threat: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production 87, 39–49 (2015).

  2. 2.

    IARC. (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Monograph on Leather dust Available at: https://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100C/mono100C-13.pdf [accessed 12 October 2016] (2012).

  3. 3.

    Islam, G. R., Khan, F. E., Hoque, M. M. & Jolly, Y. N. Consumption of unsafe food in the adjacent area of Hazaribag tannery campus and Buriganga River embankments of Bangladesh: heavy metal contamination. Environmental monitoring and assessment 186, 7233–7244 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Patel, A. & Patra, D. Influence of heavy metal rich tannery sludge on soil enzymes vis-à-vis growth of Tagetes minuta, an essential oil bearing crop. Chemosphere 112, 323–332 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Rastogi, S. K., Pandey, A. & Tripathi, S. Occupational health risks among the workers employed in leather tanneries at Kanpur. Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine 12, 132 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Mikoczy, Z. & Hagmar, L. Cancer incidence in the Swedish leather tanning industry: updated findings 1958–99. Occupational and environmental medicine 62, 461–464 (2005).

  7. 7.

    Kotaś, J. & Stasicka, Z. Chromium occurrence in the environment and methods of its speciation. Environmental pollution 107, 263–283 (2000).

  8. 8.

    IARC. Chromium, nickel and welding. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans 49 (1990).

  9. 9.

    EPA, U. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund, vol. I: human health evaluation manual. EPA/540/1-89/002.Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Avaolable at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/rags_a.pdf [Accessed 26 September 2016] (1989).

  10. 10.

    Gatto, N. M., Kelsh, M. A., Mai, D. H., Suh, M. & Proctor, D. M. Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium and cancers of the gastrointestinal tract: a meta-analysis. Cancer epidemiology 34, 388–399 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Gianello, G., Masci, O., Carelli, G., Vinci, F. & Castellino, N. Occupational Exposure to Chromium. An Assessment of Environmental Pollution Levels and Biological Monitoring of Exposed Workers. Industrial health 36, 74–77 (1998).

  12. 12.

    Junaid, M., Hashmi, M. Z., Malik, R. N. & Pei, D. S. Toxicity and oxidative stress induced by chromium in workers exposed from different occupational settings around the globe: A review. Environmental Science & Pollution Research International 23, 1–17 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Fedan, J. S. & Cutler, D. Hard Metal-Induced Disease: Effects of Metal Cations in Vitro on Guinea Pig Isolated Airways. Toxicology and applied pharmacology 174, 199–206 (2001).

  14. 14.

    Jomova, K. & Valko, M. Advances in metal-induced oxidative stress and human disease. Toxicology 283, 65–87 (2011).

  15. 15.

    Notarachille, G., Arnesano, F., Calò, V. & Meleleo, D. Heavy metals toxicity: effect of cadmium ions on amyloid beta protein 1–42. Possible implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Biometals 27, 371–388 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Wang, X. L. et al. Effect of heavy metals exposure on neurobehavioral function in welders. Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases 26, 641–644 (2008).

  17. 17.

    Beyersmann, D. & Hartwig, A. Carcinogenic metal compounds: recent insight into molecular and cellular mechanisms. Archives of toxicology 82, 493–512 (2008).

  18. 18.

    Ahamed, M., Fareed, M., Kumar, A., Siddiqui, W. A. & Siddiqui, M. K. Oxidative stress and neurological disorders in relation to blood lead levels in children. Redox Report Communications in Free Radical Research 13, 117–122 (2013).

  19. 19.

    Goulart, M., Batoreu, M., Rodrigues, A., Laires, A. & Rueff, J. Lipoperoxidation products and thiol antioxidants in chromium exposed workers. Mutagenesis 20, 311–315 (2005).

  20. 20.

    Halliwell, B. Free radicals and antioxidants—Quo vadis? Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 32, 125–130 (2011).

  21. 21.

    Chandrasekaran, V., Dilara, K. & Padmavathi, R. Pulmonary functions in tannery workers–a cross sectional study. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 58, 206–210 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Khan, D. A., Mushtaq, S., Khan, F. A. & Khan, M. Q. A. Toxic effects of chromium on tannery workers at Sialkot (Pakistan). Toxicology and industrial health 29, 1–7 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Kurt-Karakus, P. B. Determination of heavy metals in indoor dust from Istanbul, Turkey: estimation of the health risk. Environment international 50, 47–55 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Mohmand, J. et al. Human exposure to toxic metals via contaminated dust: Bio-accumulation trends and their potential risk estimation. Chemosphere 132, 142–151 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Gil, F. et al. Biomonitorization of cadmium, chromium, manganese, nickel and lead in whole blood, urine, axillary hair and saliva in an occupationally exposed population. Science of the total environment 409, 1172–1180 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Pereira, R., Ribeiro, R. & Gonçalves, F. Scalp hair analysis as a tool in assessing human exposure to heavy metals (S. Domingos mine, Portugal). Science of The Total Environment 327, 81–92 (2004).

  27. 27.

    Ali, Z., Malik, R. N. & Qadir, A. Heavy metals distribution and risk assessment in soils affected by tannery effluents. Chemistry and Ecology 29, 676–692 (2013).

  28. 28.

    Malik, R. N., Jadoon, W. A. & Husain, S. Z. Metal contamination of surface soils of industrial city Sialkot, Pakistan: a multivariate and GIS approach. Environmental geochemistry and health 32, 179–191 (2010).

  29. 29.

    Ullah, R., Malik, R. N. & Qadir, A. Assessment of groundwater contamination in an industrial city, Sialkot, Pakistan. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 3, 429–446 (2008).

  30. 30.

    Qadir, A., Malik, R. N. & Husain, S. Z. Spatio-temporal variations in water quality of Nullah Aik-tributary of the river Chenab, Pakistan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 140, 43–59 (2008).

  31. 31.

    Wma, W. M. A. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jahrbuch Für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 107, 403–405 (2009).

  32. 32.

    Wu, B., Zhao, D., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X. & Cheng, S. Multivariate statistical study of organic pollutants in Nanjing reach of Yangtze River. Journal of hazardous materials 169, 1093–1098 (2009).

  33. 33.

    Thurston, G. D. & Spengler, J. D. A quantitative assessment of source contributions to inhalable particulate matter pollution in metropolitan Boston. Atmospheric Environment 19, 9–25 (1985).

  34. 34.

    Qu, C. S. et al. Human exposure pathways of heavy metals in a lead-zinc mining area, Jiangsu Province, China. PloS one 7, e46793 (2012).

  35. 35.

    Xu, X., Li, Y., Wang, Y. & Wang, Y. Assessment of toxic interactions of heavy metals in multi-component mixtures using sea urchin embryo-larval bioassay. Toxicology in Vitro 25, 294–300 (2011).

  36. 36.

    Sun, Y., Oberley, L. W. & Li, Y. A simple method for clinical assay of superoxide dismutase. Clinical Chemistry 34, 497–500 (1988).

  37. 37.

    Beauchamp, C. & Fridovich, I. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels . Analytical Biochemistry 44, 276–287 (1971).

  38. 38.

    Hussain, S. T., Khan, U., Malik, K. Z. & Faheem, A. The Constraints to Industry in Punjab, Pakistan. Lahore Journal of Economics 17, 135–189 (2012).

  39. 39.

    Junaid, M., Malik, R. N. & Pei, D. S. Health hazards of child labor in the leather products and surgical instrument manufacturing industries of Sialkot, Pakistan. Environmental Pollution 226, 198 (2017).

  40. 40.

    Mignini, F. et al. Individual susceptibility to hexavalent chromium of workers of shoe, hide, and leather industries. Immunological pattern of HLA-B8, DR3-positive subjects. Preventive medicine 39, 767–775 (2004).

  41. 41.

    Sughis, M., Nawrot, T. S., Haufroid, V. & Nemery, B. Adverse health effects of child labor: high exposure to chromium and oxidative DNA damage in children manufacturing surgical instruments. Environmental health perspectives 120, 1469 (2012).

  42. 42.

    Zhang, M. et al. Investigating DNA damage in tannery workers occupationally exposed to trivalent chromium using comet assay. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 654, 45–51 (2008).

  43. 43.

    Barbosa, F. Jr., Tanus-Santos, J. E., Gerlach, R. F. & Parsons, P. J. A critical review of biomarkers used for monitoring human exposure to lead: advantages, limitations, and future needs. Environmental health perspectives 113, 1669–1674 (2005).

  44. 44.

    Tavani, E. & Volzone, C. Adsorption of chromium(III) from a tanning wastewater on kaolinite. Journal of the Society of Leather Technologists and chemists 81, 143–148 (1997).

  45. 45.

    Bader, M., Dietz, M., Ihrig, A. & Triebig, G. Biomonitoring of manganese in blood, urine and axillary hair following low-dose exposure during the manufacture of dry cell batteries. International archives of occupational and environmental health 72, 521–527 (1999).

  46. 46.

    ILO. (International Labor Organization). Measuring children’s work in South Asia: perspectives from national household surveys/Sherin R. Khan, Scott Lyon Available at: http://www.ilo.org/newdelhi/whatwedo/publications/WCMS_359371/lang–en/index.htm [accessed on 10 October 2015] (2015).

  47. 47.

    Fraga, C. G. Relevance, essentiality and toxicity of trace elements in human health. Molecular Aspects of Medicine 26, 235–244 (2005).

  48. 48.

    Molina-Villalba, I. et al. Biomonitoring of arsenic, cadmium, lead, manganese and mercury in urine and hair of children living near mining and industrial areas. Chemosphere 124, 83–91 (2015).

  49. 49.

    Keegan, G. M., Learmonth, I. D. & Case, C. A systematic comparison of the actual, potential, and theoretical health effects of cobalt and chromium exposures from industry and surgical implants. Critical reviews in toxicology 38, 645–674 (2008).

  50. 50.

    Hossny, E. et al. Environmental exposure of the pediatric age groups in Cairo City and its suburbs to cadmium pollution. Science of the Total Environment 273, 135–146 (2001).

  51. 51.

    O’Brien, T., Xu, J. & Patierno, S. R. Effects of glutathione on chromium-induced DNA crosslinking and DNA polymerase arrest. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 222, 173–182 (2001).

  52. 52.

    Salnikow, K. & Zhitkovich, A. Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms in Metal Carcinogenesis and Cocarcinogenesis: Nickel, Arsenic and Chromium. Chemical Research in Toxicology 21, 28 (2016).

  53. 53.

    Rodríguez-Seijo, A., Arenas-Lago, D., Andrade, M. L. & Vega, F. A. Identifying sources of Pb pollution in urban soils by means of MC-ICP-MS and TOF-SIMS. Environmental Science & Pollution Research 22, 7859–7872 (2015).

  54. 54.

    Mugoša, B., Djurović, D., Pirnat, A., Bulat, Z. & Barjaktarovićlabović, S. Children’s health risk assessment based on the content of toxic metals Pb, Cd, Cu and Zn in urban soil samples of Podgorica, Montenegro. Vojnosanitetski pregled 72, 807–812 (2015).

  55. 55.

    Esteban, M. & Castaño, A. Non-invasive matrices in human biomonitoring: A review. Environment International 35, 438–449 (2009).

  56. 56.

    Foo, S. et al. Metals in hair as biological indices for exposure. International archives of occupational and environmental health 65, S83–S86 (1993).

  57. 57.

    Freeman, D. J. & Cattell, F. C. Woodburning as a source of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environmental Science & Technology 24, 1581–1585 (1990).

  58. 58.

    Junaid, M., Hashmi, M. Z. & Malik, R. N. Evaluating levels and health risk of heavy metals in exposed workers from surgical instrument manufacturing industries of Sialkot, Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23, 18010–18026 (2016).

  59. 59.

    Na, Z., Liu, J., Wang, Q. & Liang, Z. Health risk assessment of heavy metal exposure to street dust in the zinc smelting district, Northeast of China. Science of the Total Environment 408, 726–733 (2010).

  60. 60.

    EPA, U. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund: volume III part A, process for conducting probabilistic risk assessment. Washington, D.C.: US Environmental Protection Agency. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-volume-iii-part [Accessed 22 September 2016] (2001).

  61. 61.

    Cao, Z. et al. Distribution and ecosystem risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Luan River, China. Ecotoxicology 19, 827–837 (2010).

  62. 62.

    ATSDR. Toxicological profile for nickel. Department of Health Human Services. Agency for Toxic Substances Disease Registry (1997).

  63. 63.

    Flora, S. J. & Pachauri, V. Chelation in metal intoxication. International journal of environmental research and public health 7, 2745–2788 (2010).

  64. 64.

    Sartor, F. A. et al. Impact of environmental cadmium pollution on cadmium exposure and body burden. Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal 47, 347–353 (1992).

  65. 65.

    Winn, L. M. Homologous recombination initiated by benzene metabolites: a potential role of oxidative stress. Toxicological Sciences An Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology 72, 143–149 (2003).

  66. 66.

    Zelko, I. N., Mariani, T. J. & Folz, R. J. Superoxide dismutase multigene family: a comparison of the CuZn-SOD (SOD1), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and EC-SOD (SOD3) gene structures, evolution, and expression. Free Radical Biology & Medicine 33, 337–349 (2002).

  67. 67.

    Roy, A. & Kordas, K. The Relation Between Low-Level Lead Exposure and Oxidative Stress: a Review of the Epidemiological Evidence in Children and Non-Occupationally Exposed Adults. Current Environmental Health Reports 3, 478–492 (2016).

  68. 68.

    Hassan, A. A., El-Magd, S. A. A., Ghareeb, A. F. & Bolbol, S. A. Assessment of oxidative stress and antioxidant status among petrol stations’ workers exposed to Benzene in Zagazig City. Zagazig University Medical Journal 19, 446–456 (2013).

  69. 69.

    Nielsen, F., Mikkelsen, B. B., Nielsen, J. B., Andersen, H. R. & Grandjean, P. Plasma malondialdehyde as biomarker for oxidative stress: reference interval and effects of life-style factors. Clinical Chemistry 43, 1209–1214 (1997).

  70. 70.

    Prasad, A. S. Zinc: role in immunity, oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care 12, (646–652 (2009).

  71. 71.

    Sughis, M. et al. Metal exposure in schoolchildren and working children. A urinary biomonitoring study from Lahore, Pakistan. International Journal of Hygiene & Environmental Health 217, 669–677 (2014).

  72. 72.

    Raińska, E. et al. Evaluation of occupational exposure in a slide bearings factory on the basis of urine and blood sample analyses. International journal of environmental health research 17, 113–122 (2007).

  73. 73.

    Schütz, A. et al. Lead in finger bone, whole blood, plasma and urine in lead-smelter workers: extended exposure range. International archives of occupational and environmental health 78, 35–43 (2005).

  74. 74.

    Gil, F. & Hernández, A. F. Significance of biochemical markers in applied toxicology. General, Applied and Systems Toxicology (2009).

  75. 75.

    White, M., O’Hagan, S., Wright, A. & Wilson, H. The measurement of salivary cadmium by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrophotometry and its use as a biological indicator of occupational exposure. Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology 2, 195–206 (1991).

  76. 76.

    Gervais, L., Lacasse, Y., Brodeur, J. & P’An, A. Presence of cadmium in the saliva of adult male workers. Toxicology Letters 8, 63–66 (1981).

  77. 77.

    Ortendahl, T. W., Holland, R. I. & Röckert, H. O. Studies in oral galvanism: mercury and copper levels in urine, blood and saliva in submerged electrically cutting divers. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 16, 559–573 (1989).

  78. 78.

    Cowan, D. M. et al. Manganese exposure among smelting workers: blood manganese–iron ratio as a novel tool for manganese exposure assessment. Biomarkers 14, 3–16 (2009).

  79. 79.

    Brodeur, J., Lacasse, Y. & Talbot, D. Influence of removal from occupational lead exposure on blood and saliva lead concentrations. Toxicology Letters 19, 195–199 (1983).

  80. 80.

    Khuder, A., Bakir, M. A., Hasan, R. & Mohammad, A. Determination of nickel, copper, zinc and lead in human scalp hair in Syrian occupationally exposed workers by total reflection X-ray fluorescence. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment 143, 67–74 (2008).

  81. 81.

    Afridi, H. I. et al. Levels of arsenic, cadmium, lead, manganese and zinc in biological samples of paralysed steel mill workers with related to controls. Biological trace element research 144, 164–182 (2011).

  82. 82.

    Domingo, J., Schuhmacher, M., Agramunt, M., Müller, L. & Neugebauer, F. Levels of metals and organic substances in blood and urine of workers at a new hazardous waste incinerator. International archives of occupational and environmental health 74, 263–269 (2001).

  83. 83.

    Gambelunghe, A. et al. Primary DNA damage in chrome-plating workers. Toxicology 188, 187–195 (2003).

  84. 84.

    Scheepers, P. T. J. et al. Characterisation of exposure to total and hexavalent chromium of welders using biological monitoring. Toxicology Letters 178, 185–190 (2008).

  85. 85.

    Weiss, T. et al. Levels and predictors of airborne and internal exposure to chromium and nickel among welders–results of the WELDOX study. International Journal of Hygiene & Environmental Health 216, 175–183 (2013).

  86. 86.

    Wang, T.-C. et al. Oxidative DNA damage and global DNA hypomethylation are related to folate deficiency in chromate manufacturing workers. Journal of hazardous materials 213, 440–446 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the supports from the Three Hundred Leading Talents in Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of Chongqing (to D.S.P.), the Hundred Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (to D.S.P.), the funding of Department of Environmental Science, Quaid-i-Azam University (to M.J.), the Key Application and Development Program of Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (Grant No. cstc2014yykfC20004 to D.S.P.) and the UCAS Scholarship for International Students (to M.J.). Part of this study was the previously unpublished work when the first author studied at Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, 400714, China

    • Muhammad Junaid
    • , Yu-Mei Tang
    •  & De-Sheng Pei
  2. Environmental Biology and Ecotoxicology Laboratory, Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan

    • Muhammad Junaid
    •  & Riffat Naseem Malik
  3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    • Muhammad Junaid
    •  & Yu-Mei Tang
  4. Department of Meteorology, COMSATS University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan

    • Muhammad Zaffar Hashmi

Authors

  1. Search for Muhammad Junaid in:

  2. Search for Muhammad Zaffar Hashmi in:

  3. Search for Yu-Mei Tang in:

  4. Search for Riffat Naseem Malik in:

  5. Search for De-Sheng Pei in:

Contributions

D.S.P. and R.N.M. conceived and designed the experiments. M.J. performed the experiments, analyze the data and wrote the first draft. M.Z.H., R.N.M., and D.S.P. revised the MS. Y.T. assisted in data analysis and graphics developing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Riffat Naseem Malik or De-Sheng Pei.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09075-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.