Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Nanostructured plasmonic metapixels


State-of-the-art pixels for high-resolution microdisplays utilize reflective surfaces on top of electrical backplanes. Each pixel is a single fixed color and will usually only modulate the amplitude of light. With the rise of nanophotonics, a pixel’s relatively large surface area (~10 μm2), is in effect underutilized. Considering the unique optical phenomena associated with plasmonic nanostructures, the scope for use in reflective pixel technology for increased functionality is vast. Yet in general, low reflectance due to plasmonic losses, and sub-optimal design schemes, have limited the real-world application. Here we demonstrate the plasmonic metapixel; which permits high reflection capability whilst providing vivid, polarization switchable, wide color gamut filtering. Ultra-thin nanostructured metal-insulator-metal geometries result in the excitation of hybridized absorption modes across the visible spectrum. These modes include surface plasmons and quasi-guided modes, and by tailoring the absorption modes to exist either side of target wavelengths, we achieve pixels with polarization dependent multicolor reflection on mirror-like surfaces. Because the target wavelength is not part of a plasmonic process, subtractive color filtering and mirror-like reflection occurs. We demonstrate wide color-range pixels, RGB pixel designs, and in-plane Gaussian profile pixels that have the potential to enable new functionality beyond that of a conventional ‘square’ pixel.


High resolution reflective microdisplays, based on liquid-crystal-on-silicon (LCoS) technology, are ubiquitous, underpinning a plethora of optical modulation applications including projectors, telecommunication switches, head-mounted displays1,2,3 to name but a few. A single pixel typically consists of linear polarizers, RGB pigment-based color filters and an electrically switchable waveplate (liquid crystal layer) sitting on top of a mirror-quality reflector (a square aluminum electrode ~10 μm2) connected to electronic circuitry1, 3. The purpose of this surface is purely to reflect the incoming light. However, with the simultaneous rise of nanofabrication capabilities and utilization of the unique optical phenomena associated with plasmonic devices4,5,6, there exists an opportunity to exploit this relatively large metallic surface area in order to significantly increase the functionality of microdisplay pixels with nanophotonics. Pixels capable of modulating not only amplitude, but polarization, wavelength and even the ability to adjust their in-plane shape, have potential applications ranging from 3D holographic displays, that fully represent the plenoptic optical wavefront7, 8, to hyperspectral structured illumination microscopy9,10,11, requiring sample illumination across different wavelengths and polarizations. Surface plasmons (SPs) can be considered light waves trapped on a metal surface4 and can be used to localize light to dimensions far below the optical wavelength12,13,14. Subsequently, plasmonic nanostructures have attracted a wealth of interest over the past few decades leading to a myriad of potential optical applications including sub-wavelength spectral filters15, 16, nanoscale plasmonic waveguides17 and holographic display elements18,19,20,21. For reflective pixel purposes, the attraction of plasmonics lies in sub-pixel control of the light including polarization enhanced spectral filtering and the patterning of complex information directly on a pixel’s surface. Initially, this may alleviate the need for pigment filters and incident polarizers, yet engineered pixels offer the potential to re-imagine the way in which one considers what is meant by a single pixel. Specifically, a pixel now has the ability to encode wavelength, polarization, phase and amplitude information directly on its surface7, 8, 20, 22, 23. This marks a step towards fully representing the plenoptic function of the light field, a requirement for future display devices7. Recent studies have highlighted the shortcomings of current plasmonic pixel technologies, and include: sub-optimal design schemes resulting in a low optical amplitude23,24,25,26,27, due to inherent loss mechanisms within color-generating metallic nanostructures; small color gamuts due to the type of plasmonic resonance utilized (i.e. poor full-RGB coverage)16, 24, 25, 28, 29; structures using materials incompatible with industrial manufacturing techniques and long-term use in real-world devices, such as photoresist28, 30; and focusing on the patterning of a fixed image on the surface (lack of reconfigurability)28, 30, which is completely ineffectual for any real world display system that must dynamically update. We overcome these shortcomings through multimodal absorption in nanostructured plasmonic metal-insulator-metal (MIM) pixel designs: metapixels. Our solution offers near-perfect reflection for the target color, wide wavelength selectively, polarization switchable sub-pixel optical properties and compatibility with industrial manufacturing techniques.

Generally, MIM structures are tailored for applications requiring near-perfect absorption of a particular wavelength range with near-perfect reflection of other wavelengths31, 32. Previously, the strong absorption mode associated with the structures presents a problem for wide-color gamut/RGB reflective pixels28, 30. In this work, by combining plasmonic nanostructures with MIM geometries, we can excite multiple modes simultaneously in order to tailor the optical properties of a reflector. We demonstrate new reflective pixel designs based on plasmonic nanostructure MIM geometries which offer highly reflective, polarization dependent, color filtering in the visible spectrum (400–700 nm). The devices suppress the unwanted colors either side of the target wavelength through the combination of the absorptive SP and plasmonic waveguiding modes (guided mode resonance). Hence, due to MIM geometry, mirror-like reflection for the target wavelength, and strong absorption for the unwanted wavelengths occurs. In addition, 1D, 2D and nanostructure arrays allow for the coupling of only certain polarization states and wavelengths to the absorption modes. We extend this concept to create more advanced pixels which incorporate in-plane 2D amplitude functions on the pixel itself, encoded with nanostrucutres. We use Gaussian-profile plasmonic pixels for the spatial tailoring of the color properties on a sub-pixel basis. A design whereby pixels are now no longer just rectangular, and moreover, each pixel has polarization controlled color spatial functions, ideal for the integration with liquid crystals (switchable waveplates). This represents a departure from the conventional paradigm of using square pixels that only encode amplitude.

To achieve specific color properties, we use Ag(30 nm)-SiO2(100 nm)-Al(100 nm)-Si(bulk) layers. Aluminum is typically the material of choice for back-reflectors in microdisplays with silver an excellent and widely used plasmonic material across the visible. SiO2 is cheap, mechanically and chemically stable, and has relatively flat dispersion across the visible. Hence the devices presented in this work are an exciting prospect for integration with LCoS pixel technology, which includes multiple polarizers and incorporates pigment-based color filters for spectral filtering. By varying periodicity, grating widths and designs, a range of polarization dependent plasmonic MIM color pixels are produced which utilize the existing Al reflectors as the back-reflector in a typical MIM-pixel backplane. The work here can eliminate the need for additional polarizers and pigment-based color filters on the display backplane, and adds additional functionality through polarization-spectral control and in-plane pixel color functions. Moreover, the dimensions and materials utilized means the designs are highly compatible with a range of methods for larger scale manufacturing, including extreme-UV photolithography and nanoimprint lithography33,34,35.


In comparison to a conventional LCoS microdisplay Fig. 1(a), our proposed plasmonic metapixels, schematically shown in Fig. 1(b), utilize several key resonant phenomena to form their unique optical response. Through nanostructured periodicity (both 1D (b-i) and 2D (b-ii)), providing an additional in-plane momentum component, SPs can be excited at normal incidence: both propagating (PSPs) or localised (LSPs), depending on the geometry12. Anisotropic geometry enables polarization dependency, and shrinking features to sub-wavelength, leads to color filtering. Integration into MIM geometry results in the plasmonic quasi-guided modes (QGMs) and cavity modes (CMs) being excited13, 36. For the former, the structure acts as a plasmonic waveguide for wave propagation tangential to the interface17, 31, 37, 38. Hence, metapixels, unlike conventional pixels, have optical functionality (color, polarization, amplitude, in-plane functions) encoded with nanostructures (or sub-pixels) on the pixel reflector itself. To excite a waveguide mode, top-layer periodicity (nanostructuring) is utilized - analogous to an out-of-plane grating coupler. The nanostructured top-layer grating scatters light into multiple modes, with varying wave-vector components. It is then possible to couple these diffracted modes into waveguide modes, albeit leaky, which propagate tangential to normal incidence. Moreover, depending on insulator thickness, plasmonic and or oscillatory (conventional) waveguiding modes can be excited13, 36, 39. The former (exploited in this work) has tangential E-fields confined to the interface. In addition, as the number of possible excitation modes increase, resonant-modes overlap, are simultaneously excited, and hybridization occurs. The modes in the devices in this work consist of hybridized forms of SP modes, CMs and QGMs (plasmonic).

Figure 1

Plasmonic MIM pixel (metapixel) concept. (a) Reflective LCoS microdisplay: schematic example of typical RGB-filter pixel array reflectors. Relatively large, pigment-based filters control color and hence each pixel can only be one color. From the conventional pixel to (b) the nanostructured plasmonic metapixel concept; demonstrating modulation of color. The designs are based on nanostructuring the available reflector area whereby for each target wavelength, a minimum of two absorption modes are tailored to sit either side of this wavelength thus eliminating the requirement for RGB filters in (a). The proposed pixel designs (i) and (ii), represent both 1D (sub-pixel 1D gratings) and 2D nanostructuring (sub-pixel isolated nanostructures) respectively, for achieving the different polarization dependent optical properties shown in the simulated reflection spectra above the schematics. For the 1D case (i), color modulation or near-perfect reflection can be controlled. For the 2D case (ii), multi-color modulation can be achieved. Hence now, pixels can include multiple state and multiple color functionality, yet still offer high reflection (due to MIM geometry).

MIM grating pixels

By combining ultra-thin (30 nm) plasmonic 1D gratings with MIM geometry, we now investigate our first pixel concept. Figure 2 shows the concept (a) and results of a matrix of 1D plasmonic MIM grating arrays with varying grating widths, w g (nm), and grating period, Λ (nm), with duty cycle, Γ = w g /Λ. The pixels are patterned using electron-beam lithography (EBL), the back-reflector is made from sputtered Al (100 nm), the insulator is reactively sputtered SiO2 (100 nm) and the nanostructured top-layer is thermally evaporated Ag (30 nm) - full fabrication details described in the Methods section. These parameters are chosen to optimize for dual-resonant (SPP and QGM) operation within visible wavelengths. Specifically, the insulator thickness is set such that only the fundamental plasmonic waveguiding mode (QGM) can exist13, 17, 36, and Ag top-layer for optimal SPP excitation behavior. Extensive details and supporting simulations are shown in the Supplementary Material.

Figure 2

1D grating plasmonic-MIM pixel: (a) Schematic of 1D MIM grating with common grating parameters defined: grating widths, w g (nm), grating period, Λ (nm), duty cycle, Γ = w g /Λ. (b) Shows the simulated reflection response of a typical 1D plasmonic MIM pixel with two resonant absorption modes, with the associated field profiles shown in (c). A more detailed set of simulations is found in the Supplementary Material. (d) Optical characterization results of a range of pixels exhibiting vivid colors under varying polarization conditions and (e) the SEM images of the min and max gratings for several rows. In (d), the three insets are zoomed in versions of selected RGB colors in the larger array. (f) Experimental reflection measurements, λ vs. Λ (which varies in the x-axis in (d)), of different pixel rows (1–20), showing multiple distinct resonant mode (absorption) profiles, which increase in wavelength with increasing grating period. Between the two modes there is the region of high reflection, due to Al back reflector, which is spectrally dependent on grating width and grating period.

Crucially, each 1D reflector pixel, Fig. 2(a), exhibits a minimum of two resonances: the first, is a SP-mode and the second is a QGM. Figure 2(b) shows the typical reflection response and field profiles (c) of a nanostructured MIM-grating (w g  = 120 nm, Λ = 400 nm, duty cycle = 0.3) for TM-polarization from full-wave FDTD simulations40. The two absorption modes are highlighted: the shorter wavelength mode (~427 nm) - which is close to the fundamental vertical CM - exhibits SPP, CM and QGM field-profile characteristics17, 31, 36, 37, 41, 42; the longer wavelength mode (~575 nm) exhibits SPP (Ag-SiO2) and QGM characteristics. We provide a more in-depth explanation of layer thicknesses and origins of the modes in the Supplementary Material - with specific consideration to dispersion relations. The modal dispersion is such that the grating width and duty cycle variation leads to stronger or weaker coupling into the associated system modes.

Each grating is 10 μm in length but with variation in total width. The designed grating width varies from ~80–310 nm and grating unit cell varies from ~180–600 nm. SEM images of the smallest and largest spacing pixels are shown in Fig. 2(e). For polarized incident light and analyzer aligned with TM-polarization (parallel to grating vector), a range of vivid colors in reflection are observed (d). The surrounding white part of this image is 100% reflection from the Al-back reflector. By varying the analyzer rotation the arrays transition from conventional reflector pixels to plasmonic-enhanced pixels, shown in (d). At a large grating period (low duty cycle), resonant spectra are observed. Figure 2(f) presents the experimental reflection spectra (λ vs. Λ) of a selection of the rows (labeled 1–20) as a function of duty cycle, in good agreement with simulations results (Supplementary Material). For all spectra, at least two modes are observed, which decrease in resonant wavelength as duty cycle increases (spacing decreases). In the spectra with narrowest grating widths, i.e. up to ~85–175 nm ((f) - sub-figures 1–7) strong, sharp, reflection peaks are obtainable in the visible part of the spectrum (~400–650 nm) with absorption modes either side. The reflection is normalized to a reference mirror, and due to MIM-geometry, efficiencies are high.

By selecting the widths and gratings which correspond to RGB color profiles, we can create sub-pixel arrays which act as polarization selective color pixel reflectors - shown in Fig. 3 (concept - e). Initially, we use gradually increasing spacing spiral design pixels (a-b), to investigate the color properties under varying analyzer conditions. These show bright color gradients from blue-to-red, which can be varied/switched with analyzer rotation. From this, the main RGB plasmonic-MIM pixel array concept is created - Fig. 3(c–f), which is loosely based on a typical Bayer color filter mosaic. Under incoherent, unpolarized illumination, orthogonal analyzer polarizations result in either broadband reflection or plasmonic color selection - shown in (d-f). For the latter, each sub-pixel exhibits absorption modes either side of their respective color - shown in the reflectance spectra in (f). With TE-mode selected (analyzer parallel to grating-vector), the reflectance tends to that of thin-film silver. Note that for plasmonic color selection, due to high reflectance of the target wavelength from the back-reflector, the reflectance tends to that of perfect linearly polarized light reflection i.e. 50%. The demonstration of the importance of MIM-geometry is shown in the Supplementary Material - experimental section.

Figure 3

RGB plasmonic pixel design: (a,b) Gradient spacing spirals under SEM and optical microscope under two orthogonal polarizations conditions for the analyzer (unpolarized incident). (c) SEM images of RGB pixel design, schematically shown in (e), at varying magnifications. (d) Optical characterization of an array of plasmonic pixels exhibiting RGB colors under varying polarization conditions (normalized to Al mirror) and (f) the associated reflection measurements of the main unit cell with orthogonal polarization conditions. This displays either thin-film silver reflection or dual-mode resonant absorption (color filtering) depending on analyzer condition.

2D plasmonic MIM pixels

2D nanostructured-MIM-pixel-arrays allow for additional degrees-of-freedom for polarization and spectral control, instead of just color or mirror-like reflection, as shown in the previous section. Moreover, in comparison to existing display technology, a pixel now has the ability to become more than just one color. Figure 4 shows the concept (a), and optical results (d–e) of the 2D plasmonic MIM reflector array. The total area for each sub-array is comparable to high-resolution reflective microdisplay pixels, yet here, color is generated without pigment, and amplitude response without the required incident polarization state. Selected simulation results are shown in (b–c) - highlighted from a comprehensive study described in the Supplementary Material. In general, the anisotropic nature of a typical MIM nanostructure leads to either dual-resonance behavior (orthogonal E-field to the long-axis) or single resonance (parallel E-field to the long-axis). We can identify both SPP and QGM behavior modes, which are dependent on unit cell periodicity in 2D and nanostructure geometry. The field intensity profiles (at the resonance positions) at various cross-sections across the array, are shown Fig. 4(b,c), are indicative of these modes17, 31, 36, 37, 41, 42.

Figure 4

2D plasmonic-MIM pixel: (a) Schematic of nanostructured MIM plasmonic structures, with the nanostructure dimension in the x-dimension, L x , and y-dimension L y , with symmetric grating period, Λ xy . (b,c) Selected FDTD simulations (reflection response and associated field profiles) of a typical 2D plasmonic MIM pixel with two resonant absorption modes - taken from larger set of simulations shown in Supplementary Material. α is the x-z plane intersection, β the x-y plane and γ the z-y plane. (d,e) Experimental optical characterization results of a range of pixels exhibiting vivid colors under varying polarization conditions, with selected pixels exhibiting RGB behavior shown in (g). (f) SEM images showing the extremes of the range of different arrays; from smallest-to-largest grating period (A–E) and smallest-to-largest L x parameter.

Figure 4(d,e) shows the experimental results of the plasmonic MIM pixel arrays, with SEM images of selected pixels shown below in (f). The nanostructure arrays, which have dimensions ranging from ~75–250 nm in both the x-dimension (L x ) and y-dimension (L y ), with symmetric grating period (i.e. Λ x  = Λ y  → Λ xy ) ranging from ~280–400 nm. In (e), under unpolarized incident light, the variation in analyzer rotation reveals the polarization dependent spectral filtering properties. A range of vivid colors across the visible are observed, which for orthogonal polarization conditions are symmetric about L x  = L y , as shown through the color symmetry in the optical images in (e). Hence, the reflectivity map in (d) will be transposed upon orthogonal analyzer conditions, resulting in polarization specific color properties. The optical properties are characterized through the reflectance spectra in (d) - whereby the spectra is recorded with analyzer aligned with L x . Each plot in (d) represents one of the pixels in the 6 × 6 array (with L x and L y variations), and each plot consists of 5 sub-plots representing the symmetrical unit-cell spacing variations. Hence, within each 6 × 6 array, anisotropy (aspect ratio) is increased in both x and y, and each 6 × 6 array (out of 5, A–E) representing a different unit-cell spacing (indicated in the Figure).

The results in Fig. 4(d) show that it is possible to achieve both dual and single resonances in order to tailor the reflection spectra across the visible part of the spectrum. As the grating period, Λ xy , increases (A–E), the resonant modes increase in wavelength, and in combination with increasing anisotropy, eventually split into multiple modes arising from the plasmonic MIM structure - more detail on the nanostructure modes are found in the Supplementary Material. From left-to-right (e), we can observe two short wavelength modes to begin with (i), slowly separate (ii–ii), then transition into a single mode (v–vi), which then eventually begins to split. Due to the spectral position of the shorter wavelength mode, which increases in wavelength as the spacing increases, it can be considered the grating-coupled SPP mode. The longer wavelength mode, which increases in wavelength as the spacing increases, is a hybrid SPP-QGM - more details in Supplementary Material. A wide color gamut is readily available by selecting various geometries i.e. based on the spectra in (d), it is relatively straightforward to generate a wide range of colors in reflection. Hence, in (g) we select three arrays to indicate RGB color properties. For comparison, selected reflectance spectra, from Figs 3(f) and 4(g), are plotted on CIE 1931 chromaticity diagrams in the Supplementary Material.

Plasmonic MIM Gaussian pixels

The polarization-dependent, high reflectance, spectral control from the nanostructured plasmonic metapixels opens up the possibility of creating more innovative pixel designs than just RGB filter arrays. A conventional high-resolution pixel reflector is normally just single color and with rectangular form-factor, mainly for ease of manufacturing. Yet because microdisplays are used for a plethora applications, this pixel shape may not be optimal for information discretization and display. We propose and demonstrate here the use of graded-pixels, whereby the general in-plane shape and color can be polarization controlled. Here, we utilize in-plane Gaussian profile pixels, shown in Fig. 5. The dimensions of each nanostructure is controlled in 1 or 2D with a Gaussian function. Therefore, the pixel color function is now non-uniform, non-rectangular and hence the sub-pixel spatial profile varies depending on the color.

Figure 5

Gaussian plasmonic MIM pixels: (a,b) SEM and optical images (microscope) of 2D Gaussian nanostructured pixels, with the overlaid Gaussian functions in x/y. The optical images are with two orthogonal analyzer conditions and a crossed-polarization state, showing gradient color functions associated with each pixel. Λ x and Λ y is the grating period in x and y respectively. ΔL x and ΔL y are increase in the geometry of the nanostructures dictated by the Gaussian functions, where the total length of each structure is L 0 + ΔL x and L 0 + ΔL y for x-and-y dimensions respectively and L 0 is the initial length, 60 nm (same for both axes). (c,d) As previous, but with a 1D Gaussian profile. The inset in (d), (i) is of the RGB channels of one of the Gaussian rows exhibiting how each pixel encodes varying responses depending on the wavelength. (e,f) Show the encoding of a 2D Gaussian with first-order partial derivative and second-order derivatives (Laplacian operator) for orthogonal polarization states.

In Fig. 5 we show the SEM and polarizing optical microscope images (under a range of conditions) of Gaussian pixel profiles - taken from a larger matrix, shown in the Supplementary Material. Different polarizations correspond to different pixel color/spatial functions. That is, a pixel function with polarization and wavelength dependent 2D profiles across the pixel. Moreover, gradient RGB color profiles are obtained across a single pixel, shown in the optical microscope images in (b and d). With specific reference to the intensity plots in Fig. 5(d–i), we isolate the RGB channels of the captured image and show that for one pixel, there are varying 2D profiles for each wavelength (which is polarization controlled). In (e–f) we combine Gaussian and Gaussian-derivative profiles for orthogonal polarizations to show the potential for unconventional color pixel reflector designs - the larger set is shown in the Supplementary Material. This type of pixel, whereby the effective pixel shape and diffraction pattern (far-field) is controlled with an in-plane function encoded with nanostructures on the MIM reflector itself is an extremely attractive toolbox parameter for optical display engineers. Specifically, in designing future holographic display devices, which require a large amount of optical information to be available for modulation, per pixel, in order to form arbitrary optical field profiles7, 22. More importantly, because the diffraction pattern (far-field) of a display pixel is related to its aperture function by a Fourier transform, by giving the pixel an in-plane function we can dictate the diffraction pattern of the pixel. Specifically, the far-field of a typical pixel shape (squircle) is sinc-like in nature43, resulting in unwanted higher-orders, yet a Gaussian, whose Fourier transform is yet another Gaussian, may offer an attractive solution to suppressing these artifacts.


In summary a range of nanostructured plasmonic metapixel designs have been demonstrated which offer unique spectral (full RGB) and polarization control for use as novel pixel elements in state-of-the-art high-resolution reflective microdisplays. The designs, composed of ultra-thin Ag, SiO2 and Al back-reflector, exhibit a multitude of associated resonant absorption modes including surface plasmon and quasi-guided modes. Through simultaneous excitation of resonant modes, spectrally adjacent to the wavelength of interest, color filtering is achieved and the anisotropic nanostructured elements yield polarization control. We extend the concept to both 1D and 2D nanostructures for dual-resonant behavior leading to highly vivid color pixel profiles. Furthermore, with isolated nanostructures, we can tailor additional 2D (Gaussian) profiles across each pixel which have unique 2D functions for different wavelengths. Because the effects here can be polarization controlled, the integration with liquid crystals (switchable waveplates) makes them promising candidates for a plethora of microdisplay applications and technologies. This design method is compatible with existing manufacturing techniques, for example, aluminium is already the material of choice for existing pixel-reflectors and SiO2 is easy to deposit and long-lasting. Initially the work here eliminates the requirement for pigment based filters and input polarizers for reflective display pixels, yet nanoplasmonic MIM pixels (metapixels), which have in-plane spatial profiles are now not limited by the rectangular form-factor of the conventional pixel. This offers the potential to re-imagine the way in which one considers what is meant by a ‘single-pixel’.



Pattern designs are produced parametrically in MATLAB and output to a usable patterning format for EBL. Si-SiO2(300 nm) samples are cleaned in an ultrasonic bath of acetone for 20 min, 10 min isopropyl-alcohol (IPA), blow-dried with compressed N2 and dehydrated at 200 °C for 20 min. 100 nm Al followed by a 100 nm layer of SiO2 are deposited using a remote plasma RF sputtering system at a low deposition rate, to form the insulator-back reflector above the Si. This deposition technique ensures close-packing of the deposited material, improving mechanical and chemical stability, along with optical performance. PMMA A4 950K photoresist is spin-coated on top of the sample at 5,500 rpm for 45 s to form a ~150 nm layer, then baked at 180 °C for 2 min to remove the solvent. Electron beam lithography (EBL) (Nanobeam Ltd.) is used for the high-resolution patterning at a range of dose exposures and currents (80 kV acceleration voltage, 1500–2100 μC cm−2 Area dose, 1 nAs−1 current, main-field aperture 50 μm). A cold-development (T < room temp) step is used with a 1:3 MIBK:IPA solution, for ~10 s, followed by N2 blow dry. Deposition of Ag (30 nm) is performed using a thermal evaporator (base pressure 1 × 10−6 mbar); rate of ~1 A/s. Resist lift-off is carried out in N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) at an elevated temperature of 60 °C, with 4 hours soaking, followed by fresh NMP sonication for 1 min, acetone rinse, IPA rinse and N2 blow dry.

Samples are optically characterized using an Olympus BX-51 polarizing optical microscope, with halogen bulb light-source (IR filters removed for reliable spectra across 400–800 nm), attached to a spectrometer (Ocean optics UV-VIS HR2000+) with a range of objective lenses (10–100x). Reflection results are normalized to a bulk aluminium mirror in the focal plane of the respective objective lens. A Carl-Zeiss scanning electron microscope (SEM) at an acceleration voltage of 1–5 keV is used for imaging the surface of the samples.


Full-wave finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) modeling40 is performed. Either periodic or symmetric-anti-symmetric boundary conditions (depending on geometry) are used (x-y boundaries of the unit cell) and perfectly matched layers (z-boundary) along with direction of propagation. For the 1D grating arrays, a 2D simulation environment is used, and for 2D nanostructure arrays, full-3D simulations are used. A uniform cubic mesh (Yee-cell) with dimensions <1 nm and broadband-pulse plane-wave (350–1000 nm) injection sources at a significant distance above the sample are used. For the E-and-H-field intensity plots, an additional finer mesh is included, whereby the smallest cubic mesh size is <0.01 nm (z-direction). Complex dispersive material models are used for silver (CRC model), aluminum (Palik) and SiO2 (material data). Reflection values are calculated from power monitors positioned above the range of structures and source injection. The E-and-H-fields are calculated from frequency-power-profile monitors intersecting the structures across 3-planes, processed in MATLAB and plotted.


  1. 1.

    Zhang, Z., You, Z. & Chu, D. Fundamentals of phase-only liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) devices. Light: Science & Applications 3, e213, doi:10.1038/lsa.2014.94 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lou Jepsen, M. A technology rollercoaster: Liquid crystal on silicon. Nature Photonics 1, 276–277, doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.63 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Klasen-Memmer, M. & Hirschmann, H. Liquid Crystal on Silicon Reflective Microdisplays: Handbook of Visual Display Technology. Handbook of Visual Display Technology 1–6, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79567-4 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Barnes, W. L., Dereux, A. & Ebbesen, T. W. Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 424, 824–30, doi:10.1038/nature01937 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yu, N. & Capasso, F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nature Materials 13, 139–150, doi:10.1038/nmat3839 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ghaemi, H. F. et al. Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays. Nature 391, 667–669, doi:10.1038/35570 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Geng, J. Three-dimensional display technologies. Advances in Optics and Photonics 5, 456–535, doi:10.1364/AOP (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Walther, B. et al. Spatial and Spectral Light Shaping with Metamaterials. Advanced Materials 24, 6300–6304, doi:10.1002/adma.201202540 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gustafsson, M. G. L. Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. Journal of Microscopy 198, 82–87, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00710.x (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Saxena, M., Eluru, G. & Gorthi, S. S. Structured illumination microscopy. Adv. Opt. Photon. 7, 241–275, doi:10.1364/AOP.7.000241 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Burgos, S. P., Yokogawa, S. & Atwater, H. A. Color imaging via nearest neighbor hole coupling in plasmonic color filters integrated onto a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor image sensor. ACS Nano 7, 10038–10047, doi:10.1021/nn403991d (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Maier, S. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, Boston, MA, 2007).

  13. 13.

    Hayashi, S. & Okamoto, T. Plasmonics: visit the past to know the future. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 45, 433001, doi:10.1088/0022-3727/45/43/433001 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Biagioni, P., Huang, J.-S. S. & Hecht, B. Nanoantennas for visible and infrared radiation. Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) 75, 024402, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/2/024402 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yokogawa, S., Burgos, S. P. & Atwater, H. A. Plasmonic color filters for CMOS image sensor applications. Nano Letters 12, 4349–4354, doi:10.1021/nl302110z (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li, Z., Clark, A. W. & Cooper, J. M. Dual Color Plasmonic Pixels Create a Polarization Controlled Nano Color Palette. ACS Nano acsnano.5b05411, doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b05411 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Dionne, J. A., Sweatlock, L. A., Atwater, H. A. & Polman, A. Plasmon slot waveguides: Towards chip-scale propagation with subwavelength-scale localization. Physical Review B 73, 035407, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.035407 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Montelongo, Y. et al. Plasmonic nanoparticle scattering for color holograms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 12679–12683, doi:10.1073/pnas.1405262111 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Genevet, P. & Capasso, F. Holographic optical metasurfaces: a review of current progress. Reports on Progress in Physics 78, 024401, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/2/024401 (2015).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Williams, C. et al. Engineered pixels using active plasmonic holograms with liquid crystals. Physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters 5, 1–5, doi:10.1002/pssr.201409524 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ni, X., Ishii, S., Kildishev, A. V. & Shalaev, V. M. Ultra-thin, planar, Babinet-inverted plasmonic metalenses. Light: Science & Applications 2, e72, doi:10.1038/lsa.2013.28 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Williams, C., Montelongo, Y. & Wilkinson, T. D. Switchable holographic pixel elements for 3D displays. SPIE Newsroom 3–5, doi:10.1117/2.1201506.005981 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Yun, H., Lee, S.-Y., Hong, K., Yeom, J. & Lee, B. Plasmonic cavity-apertures as dynamic pixels for the simultaneous control of colour and intensity. Nature Communications 6, 7133, doi:10.1038/ncomms8133 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zeng, B., Gao, Y. & Bartoli, F. J. Ultrathin Nanostructured Metals for Highly Transmissive Plasmonic Subtractive Color Filters. Scientific Reports 3, 1–9, doi:10.1038/srep02840 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Franklin, D. et al. Polarization-independent actively tunable colour generation on imprinted plasmonic surfaces. Nature Communications 6, 7337, doi:10.1038/ncomms8337 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Liu, Z. Z. et al. High-Performance Broadband Circularly Polarized Beam Deflector by Mirror Effect of Multinanorod Metasurfaces. Advanced Functional Materials 25, 5428–5434, doi:10.1002/adfm.201502046 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Xu, T., Wu, Y.-K., Luo, X. & Guo, L. J. Plasmonic nanoresonators for high-resolution colour filtering and spectral imaging. Nature communications 1, 59, doi:10.1038/ncomms1058 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Goh, X. M. et al. Three-dimensional plasmonic stereoscopic prints in full colour. Nature Communications 5, 5361, doi:10.1038/ncomms6361 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cheng, F., Gao, J., Luk, T. S. & Yang, X. Structural color printing based on plasmonic metasurfaces of perfect light absorption. Scientific Reports 5, 11045, doi:10.1038/srep11045 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kumar, K. et al. Printing colour at the optical diffraction limit. Nature Nanotechnology 7, 557–561, doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.128 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yan, M. Metal-insulator-metal light absorber: a continuous structure. Journal of Optics 15, 25006, doi:10.1088/2040-8978/15/2/025006 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Williams, C., Rughoobur, G., Flewitt, A. J. & Wilkinson, T. D. Single-step fabrication of thin-film linear variable bandpass filters based on metal-insulator-metal geometry. Appl. Opt. 55, 9237–9241, doi:10.1364/AO.55.009237 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Biswas, A. et al. Advances in top–down and bottom–up surface nanofabrication: Techniques, applications and future prospects. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 170, 2–27, doi:10.1016/j.cis.2011.11.001 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Henzie, J., Lee, J., Lee, M. H., Hasan, W. & Odom, T. W. Nanofabrication of plasmonic structures. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 60, 147–165, doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.040808.090352 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Williams, C. et al. Fabrication of nanostructured transmissive optical devices on ito-glass with uv1116 photoresist using high-energy electron beam lithography. Nanotechnology 27, 485301 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhou, W., Suh, J. Y., Hua, Y. & Odom, T. W. Hybridization of localized and guided modes in 2D metal-insulator-metal nanocavity arrays. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 117, 2541–2546, doi:10.1021/jp306972j (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kim, W. et al. Localized and nonlocalized plasmon resonance enhanced light absorption in metal-insulator-metal nanostructures. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 32, 1686, doi:10.1364/JOSAB.32.001686 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Han, Z. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Radiation guiding with surface plasmon polaritons. Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) 76, 016402, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/1/016402 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lin, C. I. & Gaylord, T. K. Multimode metal-insulator-metal waveguides: Analysis and experimental characterization. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 85, 1–9, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085405 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lumerical Solutions, Inc.

  41. 41.

    Tan, C., Simonen, J. & Niemi, T. Hybrid waveguide-surface plasmon polariton modes in a guided-mode resonance grating. Optics Communications 285, 4381–4386, doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2012.07.027 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bozhevolnyi, S. I. & Søndergaard, T. General properties of slow-plasmon resonant nanostructures: nano-antennas and resonators. Optics express 15, 10869–10877, doi:10.1364/OE.15.010869 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Guasti, M. F., Cobarrubias, A. M., Carrillo, F. R. & Rodríguez, A. C. {LCD} pixel shape and far-field diffraction patterns. Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 116, 265–269, doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2005.01.018 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Richard Bartholomew, James Dolan, George Gordon, Ammar Khan, Alexander Macfaden, Yunuen Montelongo and Ventsislav Valev for their help, fruitful discussion and support during the work. EPSRC Integrated Photonics & Electronic Systems Centre for Doctoral Training (Grant number: EP/L015455/1); Cambridge Commonwealth, European & International Trust.

Author information




C.W. conceived and designed the experiments. C.W. carried out the design and simulation of the devices. C.W. and G.R. fabricated the samples. C.W. performed the measurements. C.W. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calum Williams.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, C., Rughoobur, G., Flewitt, A.J. et al. Nanostructured plasmonic metapixels. Sci Rep 7, 7745 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing