Article | Open

Phylogeny of locusts and grasshoppers reveals complex evolution of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 6606 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07105-y
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Locusts are grasshoppers that can form dense migrating swarms through an extreme form of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity, known as locust phase polyphenism. We present a comprehensive phylogeny of the genus Schistocerca, which contains both non-swarming grasshoppers and swarming locusts. We find that the desert locust, S. gregaria, which is the only Old World representative of the genus, is the earliest diverging lineage. This suggests that the common ancestor of Schistocerca must have been a swarming locust that crossed the Atlantic Ocean from Africa to America approximately 6 million years ago, giving rise to the current diversity in the New World. This also implies that density-dependent phenotypic plasticity is an ancestral trait for the genus. Through ancestral character reconstruction of reaction norms, we show that colour plasticity has been largely retained in most species in the genus, but behavioural plasticity was lost and regained at least twice. Furthermore, we show that swarming species do not form a monophyletic group and non-swarming species that are closely related to locusts often express locust-like plastic reaction norms. Thus, we conclude that individual reaction norms have followed different evolutionary trajectories, which have led to the evolutionary transition between grasshoppers and locusts - and vice versa.

Introduction

Locusts are grasshoppers belonging to the family Acrididae (Insecta: Orthoptera) that can form dense migrating swarms through an extreme form of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity, in which cryptically coloured, shy individuals can transform into conspicuously coloured, gregarious individuals in response to increases in population density1,2,3. In addition to colour and behavioural changes, these insects exhibit density-dependent morphological, reproductive, developmental, physiological, biochemical, molecular, and ecological changes3,4,5,6,7. In nature, depending on local population density, locusts are polyphenic along the continuum between two extreme phenotypes, known as solitarious phase and gregarious phase1, 3. This syndrome of coordinated changes is known as locust phase polyphenism1, 3, 8.

The two phases that can result from locust phase polyphenism are “among the most striking coordinated alternative phenotypes known”9, and, in fact, locusts are now considered to be a model system for studying phenotypic plasticity8, 10. Phenotypic plasticity is often regarded as an adaptation to heterogeneous environments11,12,13 and a large body of literature has been dedicated to understanding the evolution and maintenance of adaptive phenotypic plasticity9, 13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. Several phase-related traits in locusts have been shown to be adaptive8. For example, density-dependent colour change has been shown to be an effective anti-predatory strategy in the early stage of swarm formation, especially when it is coupled with preferential feeding on toxic plants21,22,23. Recent theoretical studies have also shown that density-dependent behavioural change could have evolved as an adaptation to reduce risks of cannibalism among individuals within nymphal bands24. Life-history traits that change in response to changes in density, including maturation period, longevity, and reproductive potential, are also shown to be adaptations against rapidly changing environments3, 8, 21, 25, 26.

An effective way for studying the evolution of phenotypic plasticity is by taking a reaction norm perspective17. A reaction norm is a set of phenotypes that can be produced by an individual genotype when exposed to different environmental conditions17, 27, 28. Reaction norms can be either plastic or non-plastic17, 29 and they can be the objects of selection16, 17, 27 or subject to evolutionary processes, such as drift15, 30. For instance, among the phase-related traits in locusts, nymphal colouration can be considered a kind of a reaction norm31, 32. Many locust species have a plastic reaction norm in which nymphal colouration changes from green to a conspicuous colour (a combination or red, orange, or yellow and black patterns) when crowded3, 33 while closely related non-swarming species may have a non-plastic reaction norm in which nymphal colouration does not change regardless of rearing density32, 33. The same idea can be applied to other phase-related traits, with potentially different underlying mechanisms regulating each reaction norm. In other words, locust phase polyphenism is a collection of individual plastic reaction norms that all respond to changes in density32.

Most of the studies on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity deal with variations in reaction norms within species or within populations and there are only a handful of studies focusing on multiple species in a comparative framework32, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42. However, an explicitly phylogenetic study of phenotypic plasticity, that is, tracing the evolution of reaction norms based on a robust phylogenetic hypothesis, is extremely rare. This is because obtaining an accurate phylogenetic hypothesis and quantifying reaction norms of multiple species in a clade are both challenging tasks. A comparative quantification of phenotypic plasticity is especially difficult because the existence of plasticity has to be empirically demonstrated through explicit experiments16. Nevertheless, a phylogenetic investigation into the evolution of phenotypic plasticity can result in valuable insights38, 40, 41, 43,44,45,46 because reaction norms can be considered as characters that evolve by descent with modification. If a group of extant species expresses plastic reaction norms and if these species are shown to be monophyletic based on a phylogenetic analysis, it is possible to attribute plasticity to common ancestry, rather than novel adaptation in each species43. Therefore, a phylogenetic approach in the study of phenotypic plasticity can provide a more accurate understanding regarding the polarity of the evolution of reaction norms32, 38, 43.

The genus Schistocerca Stål (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Cyrtacanthacridinae) is an excellent model system for studying the evolution of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity because it contains both locusts and non-swarming grasshoppers32, 47 (Fig. 1). Of about 50 species in the genus, only three species are considered to be true swarming locusts that have afflicted humanity over millennia by consuming agricultural yields en masse: the desert locust (S. gregaria), the Central American locust (S. piceifrons), and the South American locust (S. cancellata)48. There is a fourth species, S. interrita, which exhibited major outbreaks during 1983–1984 and 1997–2003 on the northern coast of Peru49, but this species is typically not known to swarm under normal conditions33 and not much is known about its biology. The remaining Schistocerca species are sedentary grasshoppers that do not swarm32, 47. Nevertheless, several sedentary species are known to express density-dependent phenotypic plasticity in colour, similar to the change expressed in the desert locust32, 50,51,52,53, while other species do not respond to changes in density at all54, 55. Furthermore, at least two sedentary Schistocerca species are known to change their behaviour in response to crowding51. In other words, a large amount of variation exists in the specific expression of density-dependent reaction norms within Schistocerca. Thus, by understanding the evolutionary relationships between locust species and non-swarming species that share a common ancestor, and by characterising density-dependent reaction norms across these species, it is possible to investigate the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in traits that collectively make up the complex syndrome of locust phase polyphenism.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Some representatives of the genus Schistocerca; (A) Gregarious nymphs of S. gregaria; (B) S. ceratiola; (C) S. lineata nymph feeding on Ptelea; (D) Gregarious nymphs of S. piceifrons; (E) S. albolineata; (F) S. shoshone; (G) S. caribbeana; (H) S. nitens (Photo credit: Gil Wizen [A], Hojun Song [B–H]).

The biogeography of Schistocerca provides a unique scenario for inferring whether density-dependent phenotypic plasticity is an ancestral or a derived trait for the genus. The subfamily Cyrtacanthacridinae, to which Schistocerca belongs, contains 35 genera and is distributed throughout the Old World, with most of its diversity in Africa32. Only two genera occur in the New World, Halmenus, a brachypterous genus endemic to the Galapagos Archipelagos56 and Schistocerca, which shows an unusual transatlantic distribution. It has been previously suggested that Halmenus is actually a brachypterous member of Schistocerca57, 58. Within the genus, only the desert locust is found in the Old World (Africa and the Middle East) while all the other species occur in the New World (North, Central, and South America). To explain this interesting biogeographic pattern, two alternative hypotheses have been proposed57, 59. The desert locust was initially considered a migrant species from the New World47 because it is morphologically very similar to the species in the Americana Complex, which also includes other locust species in the genus47, 48, and because it is able to copulate with several New World species, although no viable offspring are produced60. This idea that an ancestral species originating from the New World colonised Africa and gave rise to the present-day desert locust is referred to as the New World Origin hypothesis. However, a highly unusual incident in 1988 prompted scientists to propose an alternative hypothesis. In October and November of 1988, large swarms of the desert locust successfully crossed the Atlantic Ocean from West Africa to reach the Caribbean and neighboring parts of South America61,62,63. This seemingly impossible flight was later postulated to have lasted only a few days, considering prevailing wind patterns (northeast trade winds) and the energy required to achieve the continuous flight of 5000 km62, 64. Based on this incident, Ritchie and Pedgley63 and Kevan61 proposed that the New World Schistocerca species were descendants of a “gregaria-like” ancestor from Africa that crossed the Atlantic Ocean. This second idea is referred to as the Old World Origin hypothesis.

These two hypotheses can be easily tested by the placement of S. gregaria in the phylogeny of Schistocerca. The New World Origin hypothesis can be supported if the desert locust is phylogenetically nested deep within the New World species. This would also indicate that density-dependent phenotypic plasticity is a derived trait within the genus. On the other hand, the Old World Origin hypothesis can be supported if the desert locust is placed basally to the rest of the New World Schistocerca, which would also mean that density-dependent phenotypic plasticity is an ancestral trait for the genus. Interestingly, both hypotheses have been previously supported based on different lines of evidence57,58,59, and the conflict has not been fully resolved.

Therefore, in this study, we reconstruct a robust phylogeny of Schistocerca to date using molecular data in order to better understand how locusts and non-swarming grasshoppers are related to each other and to test how colour and behavioural reaction norms have evolved in this genus. We demonstrate that the evolution of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity can be effectively studied in a phylogenetic framework and that different reaction norms of locust phase polyphenism show different patterns of divergence. Finally, we use the phylogeny and biogeography to understand the patterns of diversification in Schistocerca and how they relate to the evolution of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity.

Results

Phylogeny and biogeography of Schistocerca

We used both maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses to infer the phylogeny of Schistocerca, which resulted in identical topologies and recovered Schistocerca as a strong monophyletic group (Fig. 2). The divergence time analysis estimated that the genus originated about 7.9 million years ago (Fig. 3). Within the genus, the desert locust (S. gregaria), the only African representative, was placed at the base of the phylogeny, and the remaining New World Schistocerca species formed a monophyletic group. The colonisation of the New World by the ancestral Schistocerca from Africa was estimated to have taken place about 6 million years ago. Using the DIVALIKE model in BioGeoBEARS, we inferred that the ancestral Schistocerca colonised and diversified in South America first, and then went through radiation in Central and North America. The flightless genus Halmenus, represented by H. robustus, was the most closely related to S. literosa and S. melanocera, suggesting a single colonisation event to the Galápagos Islands by the common ancestor of the three species, which was estimated to have taken place 3.6 million years ago, soon after the islands became available for colonisation. The remaining New World species consisted of several clades that were geographically clustered, including the Caribbean, South America, North America, and Central America. Overall, we inferred the diversification of major lineages to have taken place during the Pliocene and continued throughout the early Pleistocene.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Bayesian tree of Schistocerca based on molecular data. Gray dots on the nodes denote posterior probability of 100. Nodal support values lower than 100 are specified. Red branches indicate swarming locusts and blue branches indicate sedentary grasshoppers.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Time-calibrated tree of Schistocerca with estimated ancestral ranges inferred using DIVALIKE model implemented in BioGEOBEARS (d = 4.4589; e = 0.0287; LnL = −63.73). Outgroups are not shown. The species in bold face indicate swarming locusts. Both S. flavofasciata and S. nitens (USA) have broad distribution across two defined regions.

We found the previously proposed species groups to be largely paraphyletic. The Americana Complex sensu Harvey48 originally included S. americana, S. piceifrons, S. cancellata, S. gregaria, S. serialis, and S. pallens, but we found that these six species did not form a clade. The Alutacea Group sensu Song65, which included S. alutacea, S. rubiginosa, S. lineata, S. shoshone, S. albolineata, and S. obscura, was also paraphyletic due to the placement of S. ceratiola, which was found to be more closely related to S. obscura and S. alutacea. We included three specimens of S. pallens collected from Mexico, Brazil, and Bolivia, but they did not form a monophyletic group because the Bolivian specimen was sister to S. cancellata. Likewise, we included four specimens of S. nitens collected from U.S.A., northern and southern Mexico, and Costa Rica, but they also did not form a monophyletic group. Conversely, three specimens of S. lineata, a species known to feed on different host plants66, were also included and found to be monophyletic.

Evolution of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity

We found that the three locust species (S. gregaria, S. piceifrons, and S. cancellata) did not form a monophyletic group, suggesting that swarming locusts have evolved multiple times within Schistocerca (Fig. 2). We inferred that the ancestral Schistocerca species must have been a swarming locust due to the basal placement of S. gregaria, and that swarming behaviour was lost and regained at least twice: once in S. piceifrons and once in S. cancellata. The ancestral character reconstruction (Fig. 4) revealed that nearly all Schistocerca species, as well as the cyrtacanthacridine outgroups, express a density-dependent plastic reaction norm in nymphal colouration, which suggests that this could be a symplesiomorphic trait for Schistocerca. This plastic reaction norm appears to have been maintained throughout the diversification of the genus, but was independently lost at least three times: in S. caribbeana, S. nitens from the USA, and S. ceratiola. In contrast, we found the expression of a plastic behavioural reaction norm to be rare within the genus. Although S. gregaria shows a density-dependent plastic reaction norm in behaviour, which implies that the common ancestor of Schistocerca must have exhibited behavioural plasticity, it was quickly lost and the capacity to respond to density was not maintained at all throughout the diversification of the genus. Since the initial loss, this plastic reaction norm was regained twice within the genus. We also tested whether these two reaction norms have evolved in a correlated fashion using Pagel’s method67, and found that there was no correlation between them (Mk model, likelihood-ratio = −9.160668, p-value = 1). This pattern collectively suggests that two density-dependent plastic reaction norms that are often associated with locust phase polyphenism had very different evolutionary trajectories throughout the diversification of Schistocerca.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Ancestral character state reconstruction using stochastic character mapping. The left tree shows the evolution of density-dependent reaction norm in nymphal colouration and the right tree shows the evolution of density-dependent reaction norm in behaviour. The pie chart-like symbols on the nodes represent the probability of ancestral character state. The species in bold face indicate swarming locusts.

Discussion

Phenotypic plasticity is rarely studied in a phylogenetic framework because generating a reliable phylogeny is not a trivial matter and it is also often difficult to quantify reaction norms of the taxa used in the analysis16. However, when such an approach is taken, it can provide unique insights into understanding the evolution of reaction norms38, 40, 43. In this study, we present the most definitive phylogeny of Schistocerca to date, which provides a comparative framework for elucidating how density-dependent phenotypic plasticity might have evolved in this clade (Fig. 2). We have also reconstructed ancestral character states of density-dependent reaction norms based on this phylogeny to demonstrate that the two reaction norms that are most associated with locust phase polyphenism, colour and behaviour, have followed two very different evolutionary trajectories throughout the diversification of the genus (Fig. 4).

It has long been recognised that understanding the evolutionary relationships between locusts and non-swarming grasshoppers within Schistocerca is the key to unraveling the evolution of locust phase polyphenism57,58,59. In particular, the phylogenetic position of the desert locust (S. gregaria) relative to the rest of the genus has major implications for inferring the polarity of reaction norm evolution. According to our phylogeny, the desert locust is the earliest diverging lineage within the genus, implying that the ancestral Schistocerca must have originated from Africa and colonised the New World, thereby supporting the Old World Origin hypothesis. The controversy regarding the origin of the desert locust was previously examined from a phylogenetic perspective based on two different lines of evidence. Song59 proposed the first phylogeny of Schistocerca using 57 morphological characters, which placed the desert locust deep within the Americana Complex mostly based on the shape of pronotum, male cerci, and male genitalia. This phylogenetic position of the desert locust supported the New World Origin hypothesis, but the study was unable to adequately demonstrate how the ancestral Schistocerca might have colonized the New World in the first place. Song59 invoked a potential transpacific colonization by the ancestral Schistocerca from the Indo-Pacific to South America based on the recovered topology of cyrtacanthacridine outgroups, but provided little evidence for this assertion. Lovejoy et al.57 presented the first molecular phylogeny of Schistocerca based on 1.7 kb fragments of mitochondrial genome spanning ND1 to 12S, which robustly placed the desert locust at the base of Schistocerca phylogeny, supporting the Old World Origin hypothesis. Their phylogeny is highly congruent with our phylogeny, which contains nearly 10 times the amount of sequence data. The discrepancies in phylogenetic signal between morphological and molecular data deserve some explanations. While it is now clear that the desert locust is the earliest diverging lineage within the genus, it is morphologically most similar to the swarming species in the Americana Complex, which do not share the most recent common ancestor with the desert locust. This pattern could suggest that there might have been a strong selective pressure for different swarming locust species to converge on a similar body form, so much so that most of the taxonomically important characters are actually homoplasious. Also, because Schistocerca is a relatively recently-derived genus, it is possible that not enough morphological differences have yet accumulated among species. In fact, compared to other grasshopper groups, the male genitalia, which are typically the most taxonomically useful characters in grasshoppers, are essentially identical across the entire genus47, 65. Thus, we consider that Song’s59 morphological phylogeny was heavily affected by convergent characters, which might have led to incorrect biogeographic inferences.

We estimate that the westward colonisation from Africa by the ancestral Schistocerca took place during the Pliocene, when the continents were essentially identical to their current configuration. Thus, the westward transatlantic flight from Africa to America is the only plausible explanation for the current distribution57, 62, 64. When the swarms of the desert locust crossed the Atlantic Ocean in 1988, they all perished without establishing any viable populations62, but it is not too far-fetched to imagine that such transatlantic dispersals could have happened in the past, and one of these events might have resulted in the original stock for the New World Schistocerca. A recent study68 based on a paleoclimate simulation proposed that the aridification of the Sahara Desert was caused by the shrinkage of the Tethys Sea during the Tortonian state (7–11 million years ago) of the Late Miocene, coinciding with the estimated origin of Schistocerca (Fig. 3). This aridification process could have created favourable environmental conditions for the ancestral Schistocerca to evolve an extreme form of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity. Studies have also suggested that the aridification in subtropical West Africa coincided with the intensification of northeast trade winds69, which blew from northwestern Africa to the Caribbean islands and northern South America. If the swarms of the ancestral Schistocerca took advantage of the northeast trade winds for crossing the Atlantic Ocean, the place it arrived must have been a very different place from where they originated. During the Pliocene, South America essentially consisted of tropical forests and patches of savanna70. In this new environment, it would have been more adaptive for these locusts to be in the solitarious phase than to be swarming locusts, which could have eventually led to the loss of swarming behaviour in descendant species.

We have established that the presence of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity is an ancestral trait for the genus. When we dissect this phenotypic plasticity into smaller reaction norms, we begin to see two very different evolutionary patterns. One of these, nymphal colouration, is the most obvious reaction norm that responds to density in locusts32. In the desert locust, individuals reared in isolation are typically green, and those reared in crowded conditions develop black patterns with yellow background colour1 (Fig. 1A). Green nymphal colouration is cryptic and helps the locusts to blend into the vegetation30. Sword et al.23 showed that when gregarious nymphs of the desert locust in Mauritania feed on a native toxic plant, Hyoscyamus muticus, at the onset of population density increase, their contrasting colour pattern could function as a warning colouration. Thus, this plastic reaction norm might have evolved in the context of an anti-predator strategy8, 22. However, our survey of the effect on crowding in nymphal colouration across Cyrtacanthacridinae based on both literature and experimental data shows that this plastic reaction norm is not a novel trait for Schistocerca, but actually a conserved and widespread trait throughout the subfamily32. Although it is not clear in what context this plastic reaction norm in nymphal colouration evolved in the first place, the density-dependent aposematism shown in the desert locust appears to be a case of exaptation.

Because this plastic reaction norm is a symplesiomorphic trait for the genus, any Schistocerca species that changes colour in response to crowding can be inferred to have retained this reaction norm and any species that does not change colour when crowded can be inferred to have lost the plasticity. Although we had missing data for 16 taxa (43.2% missing), we were able to reconstruct the ancestral reaction norms and predict the probability of plastic reaction norms for the missing taxa using the stochastic character mapping approach71 (Fig. 4). We infer that the plastic reaction norm in nymphal colouration has largely persisted throughout the diversification of the genus. However, it is worth noting that the expression of this plastic reaction norm varies quite a bit amongst the New World Schistocerca species32. For example, the gregarious nymphs of the Central American locust (S. piceifrons) (Fig. 1D) and the South American locust (S. cancellata) express contrasting colouration patterns of red and black or yellow and black, respectively33. Two sedentary species closely related to the Central American locust (S. americana and S. serialis cubense) exhibit similar red and black patterns when experimentally crowded51. Also, a central Texas population of S. lineata, a sedentary species that feeds on a toxic plant (Ptelea trifoliata) exhibits density-dependent warning colouration72 and shows bright yellow and black patterns when crowded (Fig. 1C).

Most other sedentary Schistocerca species, however, do not undergo such a dramatic colour change, but rather a subdued one32, usually changing from green to light yellow, reddish brown, orange, or tan with black mottling patterns. These colour patterns are not consistent with aposematic colouration and it is also unknown whether these species feed on toxic plants when crowded. In nature, most of these sedentary species typically do not occur in high densities and nymphs are nearly always green. We think that these species have the genetic capacity to change colour in response to density mainly due to shared ancestry, but this plasticity is normally not expressed. We also think that it is probably not costly to maintain this variation, and there has not been a strong selective pressure against maintaining this plasticity. Interestingly, there are three species in the genus that exhibit a non-plastic reaction norm in nymphal colouration. Two of them, S. caribbeana and S. nitens, are polychromatic as nymphs, meaning that isolated nymphs are not only green, but also brown or gray55. Nymphs of the third species, S. ceratiola, are green with white stripes and black dots regardless of the rearing density. For these non-plastic species, there could have been strong selective pressure to completely lose the plasticity or a stochastic process, such as drift, might have led to fixation of a non-plastic reaction norm. What is possibly even more interesting is that these three species are phylogenetically divergent from each other, which suggests that the loss of plasticity has happened independently.

The ability to change behaviour in response to change in population density is at the core of what defines locusts3, 8. Solitarious locusts tend to be shy and inactive, and avoid other locusts, while gregarious locusts tend to be highly active and mobile, and attracted to each other73. In the desert locust, it only takes a few hours to induce behavioural gregarisation74 and it is known that a combination of visual and olfactory stimuli, or a tactile stimulus on hind femora alone, can induce change in behaviour75. Although the ancestral condition for Schistocerca was the expression of plastic reaction norm in behaviour, this condition does not seem to have persisted throughout the diversification of the genus, unlike the pattern we observe in nymphal colouration. The ancestral state reconstruction suggests that behavioural plasticity was quickly lost in the common ancestor of the New World Schistocerca, only to reappear twice (Fig. 4).

Recent theoretical and empirical studies have suggested that migrating locusts, especially as nymphal bands, are in a generally poor nutritional state76, and that the threat of intraspecific cannibalism can influence the evolution of local interactions and collective movement in the desert locust77. In other words, density-dependent behavioural plasticity could be considered an adaptation to reduce risks of cannibalism24. As alluded to earlier, the ancestral Schistocerca that colonised the New World probably experienced an environment that was nutritionally rich, assuming that the plants it encountered were edible. This means that the selective pressure to maintain the expression of plastic reaction norm in behaviour in northern Africa was no longer present, or it could have been even maladaptive to express behavioural plasticity in this new environment. Furthermore, the availability of resources may have been more abundant and less variable temporally in the New World habitats compared to the heterogeneous desert habitats, possibly leading to less variable population dynamics. These two factors could then have led to the loss of behavioural traits that were originally adapted to life in a crowd. Such an example can be found in the South African subspecies of the desert locust, S. gregaria flaviventris. This subspecies is geographically isolated from its nominal species by 2,500 km and occurs between the Kalahari Desert and the Western Cape of South Africa, characterised by Succulent Karoo and Fynbos78,79,80. This subspecies is genetically distinct from the nominal species and shows a much-reduced level of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity79. Although this subspecies still inhabits arid areas in South Africa, it has more access to a continuous supply of vegetation compared to its northern relative, which might have contributed to the loss of the plastic reaction norm in behaviour. In the New World, many of the sedentary Schistocerca species have evolved preferences for host plants and adopted a very different life history strategy from locusts72, 81,82,83. In this sense, it is actually surprising that the plastic reaction norm in behaviour was regained twice in Schistocerca. On the other hand, one of these species, the South American locust (S. cancellata), is adapted to arid or semi-arid regions in northern Argentina78 and it is possible that similar selective pressures that the desert locust experiences may have promoted the regaining of behavioural plasticity in this species. Conversely, the Central American locust (S. piceifrons) is a tropical locust84, which swarms in the presence of lush vegetation, and it is not yet clear what factors might have promoted the re-expression of plastic reaction norm in behaviour in this species. What is more interesting is that the sedentary species that are closely related to S. piceifrons actually express a reduced amount of density-dependent behavioral plasticity51. This indicates that reaction norm in behaviour expressed in Schistocerca is not necessarily binary (present/absent), but can evolve or be lost gradually.

Considering the different evolutionary trajectories of colour and behavioural plasticity in Schistocerca, it is important to consider the proximate mechanisms behind these reaction norms. Studies have shown that the black patterns associated with gregarious nymphs are due to a hormonal factor in the brain and corpora cardiaca, known as [His7]-corazonin85, which is a conserved peptide that has a darkening effect in many lineages within Orthoptera86. A recent study shows that the knockdown of corazonin (Crz) gene is known to induce lightening of body colour87, further confirming the role of this peptide. The corazonin-mediated colour change does not happen instantaneously and may take up to several instars, implying that the plastic reaction norm in nymphal colouration requires physiological machinery that is slow-acting. Our study suggests that this physiological machinery has been phylogenetically conserved throughout the diversification of Schistocerca. On the contrary, the plastic reaction norm in behaviour, at least in the desert locust, is a rapid response to the changes in density, mediated by a conserved neurotransmitter, serotonin88, 89. The change in behaviour can occur within hours because the gregarious behaviour is a response to a sudden pulse of serotonin in the metathoracic ganglion90. A direct application of serotonin on to the thoracic ganglia elicits behavioural gregarisation88, 90. It has also been shown that a cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), which is a downstream effector of one of several serotonin receptors in insects (5HT7), as well as an intracellular effector molecule closely linked to learning, is also required for this transition91. However, long-term gregarious nymphs actually express low levels of serotonin92, meaning that its effect on behavioural gregarisation is transient. It also appears that it is not the overall increase of serotonin in the thoracic hemocoel93, but a sudden increase in the specific areas within thoracic ganglia that elicits behavioural gregarisation. A recent immunofluorescence study89 showed that the desert locust has three classes of serotonergic neurons in their thoracic ganglia that respond to either all gregarising stimuli, only sight and smell of other locusts, or long-term crowding or isolation. So far, the mechanism of serotonin production and the effect of serotonin as related to locust phase polyphenism has only been examined in the desert locust89, 90, 92, but it is possible to postulate that a similar pattern might be found in other swarming Schistocerca species, but not in sedentary species. Thus, within Schistocerca, what might have evolved in locust species could be the ability to quickly produce a high level of serotonin in thoracic ganglia in response to the increase in density. However, it should be noted that there are other biogenic amines that are involved in behavioural gregarisation90, 92 and that serotonin is not ubiquitously important in all locust species. For example, in the migratory locust (Locusta migratoria), dopamine plays a more important role in modulating phase changes94, 95, while serotonin enhances solitarious behaviour96.

So far, much of what we know about the mechanism of locust phase polyphenism has come from the study of the desert locust3, 8. In this study, we have established a robust phylogenetic framework and the polarity of the evolution of reaction norms. We have also shown that the plastic reaction norms in colour and behaviour have evolved separately and that there is no evidence that they have evolved in a correlated fashion (Fig. 5). Based on these findings, we can now begin to examine specific physiological, neurological, and molecular mechanisms of density-dependent phenotypic plasticity in the Central American locust and the South American locust, as well as other non-swarming sedentary species, to compare with the mechanisms already established in the desert locust. In particular, it would be of great interest to test whether the proximate mechanism of behavioural gregarisation, which must have been lost and regained within Schistocerca, is similar or different between the desert locust and the other locust species. Finally, we conclude that the phylogeny of Schistocerca has enabled new insights into the complex evolution of phenotypic plasticity and has opened a door to understand the back-and-forth evolutionary transitions between grasshoppers and locusts.

Figure 5
Figure 5

A graphical summary of evolution of density-dependent reaction norms as inferred from this study. The ancestral Schistocerca was a swarming locust and must have had plastic reaction norms in both behaviour and colour. However, behavioural plasticity was lost in the descendant species while colour plasticity was maintained. In some species, colour plasticity was lost and they have become completely non-responsive to density. There has been at least two independent re-gains of behaviour plasticity giving rise to two locust species in the New World.

Methods

Taxon and character sampling

We sampled a total of 37 taxa, including 6 cyrtacanthacridine genera as outgroups and 31 ingroup taxa representing the genus Schistocerca. Because previous molecular studies have consistently suggested that the Galapagos endemic genus Halmenus is, in fact, flightless Schistocerca57, 58, we included H. robustus as one of the ingroup taxa. We also included multiple samples of three widely distributed species (S. pallens, S. nitens, and S. lineata) collected from different geographic localities to test their monophyly. Our ingroup sampling consisted of three major locust species (S. gregaria, S. piceifrons, and S. cancellata) as well as phylogenetically diverse lineages of sedentary, non-swarming Schistocerca species. Detailed information about taxon sampling is found in Supporting Information Table S1.

For all taxa, we generated nucleotide sequences through shotgun sequencing of genomic DNA using the Illumina platform. To extract high molecular weight DNA, we used Gentra Puregene Tissue Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. The quality and concentration of DNA extracts were initially measured using either Qubit Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or DeNovix Spectrophotometer, and more thoroughly analysed using Fragment Analyzer. We used Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit for library preparation and performed 250 bp paired-end (PE) sequencing using MiSeq, 150 bp PE sequencing using NextSeq 500 or 125 bp PE sequencing using HiSeq 2500. Library preparation and next generation sequencing (NGS) were conducted at either Georgia Genomic Facility (MiSeq and NextSeq 500) or Texas A&M Genomics and Bioinformatics Service (HiSeq 2500). The resulting raw reads were quality-trimmed in CLC Genomics Workbench 8 (Qiagen). We used the MITObim pipeline97 to assemble mtgenomes de novo from the NGS reads. All newly assembled mtgenomes were first uploaded as raw fasta files to MITOS98 to identify open reading frames (ORFs) and tRNAs. The initial MITOS annotation was used as a guideline to delimit gene boundaries, and start and stop codons of each protein-coding gene were manually identified in Geneious 10.0.9 (Biomatters), following the recommendation by Cameron99. We also extracted histone 3 (H3) and histone 2B (H2B) genes from the shotgun sequence data by using ‘Map to Reference’ tool in Geneious. Using a grasshopper H3 sequence (KM853687) and a spider H2B sequence (XM_016058247) downloaded from GenBank as references, we used the Geneious mapper with low sensitivity to search for short reads that mapped to the reference sequences. This approach was very effective in extracting these two nuclear protein-coding genes from all 37 taxa. DNA sequence data generated for this study were deposited to GenBank and the accession numbers can be found in Supporting Information Table S1.

Phylogenetic analyses

For both mitochondrial and nuclear protein-coding genes, we aligned based on the conservation of reading frames by first translating into amino acids and aligning individually in MUSCLE100 (Edgar, 2004) using default parameters in Geneious. Transfer RNA and ribosomal RNA genes were individually aligned in MAFFT101 using the E-INS-i algorithm also in Geneious. All these individual alignments were concatenated into a single matrix using SequenceMatrix102. We divided the data into a total of 69 data blocks (13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes, H3, and H2B divided into individual codon positions, 22 tRNAs, and 2 rRNAs) and used PartitionFinder v.2.1.1103 using the “greedy” algorithm (heuristic search) with branch lengths estimated as “unlinked” to search for the best-fit scheme as well as to estimate the model of nucleotide evolution for each partition. The final matrix consisted of 15,801 aligned bp and 37 taxa.

We performed both maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian analyses on the total evidence dataset. For the ML analysis, we used the best-fit partitioning scheme recommended by PartitionFinder with the GTRCAT model applied to each partition and analysed using RAxML 7.2.8104. Nodal support was evaluated using 1,000 replications of rapid bootstrapping implemented in RAxML. For the Bayesian analysis, we applied a different, unlinked model for each partition, as recommended by PartitionFinder, and ran four runs with four chains each for 100 million generations, sampling every 2500 generations in MrBayes 3.2.6105. We plotted the likelihood trace for each run to assess convergence in Tracer 1.6106, and discarded an average of 25% of each run as burn-in. Both analyses were run on XSEDE (Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment, https://www.xsede.org) through the CIPRES Science Gateway107. The resulting trees were visualized in Geneious. Our aligned dataset and the resulting trees, as well as all associated data were deposited to Mendeley Data (http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/2g98nw9js5.1).

Divergence time estimation

We estimated a time calibrated tree based on node dating in MrBayes with an independent gamma rate (IGR) as a relaxed clock model. We used an exponential prior (10) on the variance of the gamma distribution. We used a fossil taxon Proschistocerca oligocaenica Zeuner 1937 (37.2 to 33.9 Ma), which is the oldest definitive fossil of the subfamily Cyrtacanthacridinae108, to calibrate the root age, using an offset exponential distribution with minimal age 33.9 Ma and mean age 35.55 Ma. Although there is no fossil available for Schistocerca, we could infer the minimum age of at least one internal node based on a geological history. Three species (including H. robustus) are endemic to the Galapagos Islands and they form a clade, and it is generally accepted that colonisation events to the Galapagos have occurred over the last 3 to 4 million years109. So, we inferred that the common ancestor of these three species must have colonised the islands after some of the islands became colonisable. Thus, we used the ages of two oldest islands, South Plaza (4.2 Ma) and Espanola (3.2 Ma) to calibrate the node of this Galapagos clade (uniform, 3.2–4.2). We ran four runs with four chains each for 30 million generations, sampling every 2500 generations.

Ancestral range estimation

We used the R package BioGeoBEARS110 in R111 to infer the biogeographical history of Schistocerca based on the time-calibrated tree. We defined eight areas to delimit geographical ranges indicating presence/absence of each species in each discrete area: Africa, South America, Central America, North America, Caribbean, Galapagos, Australia, and Indo-Pacific. We chose Caribbean and Galapagos as separate areas because of the endemic species in these areas and to emphasize the dispersal from South America to Galapagos. We included an adjacency matrix indicating connectivity between the discrete areas. The maximum number of ancestral areas was restricted to two in order to reflect the current distribution of the extant species. The analysis was non-time stratified because the age of the group was estimated to be geologically very recent with non-significant changes in the geographical areas.

Ancestral character reconstruction

We compiled data on density-dependent phenotypic plasticity for all of the taxa included in this study (Supporting Information Table S2). Specifically, we examined two reaction norms that are commonly associated with locust phase polyphenism: colour and behaviour. We treated both reaction norms as binary traits. For both colour and behaviour, we coded as ‘non-plastic’ if there was a specific experimental study or observation showing the lack of any plastic reaction norm in a given species. For colour, we coded as ‘plastic’ if the species was known to show the development of black patterns or change in background colouration when crowded. For behaviour, we coded as ‘plastic’ for all locust species as well as some species that were experimentally shown to exhibit behavioural plasticity. For those species without clear data, we coded as unknown by giving 50% probability to both states. We estimated the ancestral character states for discrete traits using an MCMC based stochastic character mapping71 using phytools112 in R. Specifically, we simulated 500 stochastic character maps from our dataset to sample character histories from their posterior probability distribution. To test whether reaction norms in colour and behaviour have evolved in a correlated manner, we used Pagel’s character correlation test67, also using phytools in R.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Uvarov, B. P. Grasshoppers and Locusts, Vol. 1. (Cambridge University Press, 1966).

  2. 2.

    Pener, M. P. In Invertebrate Endocrinology, Vol. 1, Endocrinology of Insects (eds R. G. H. Downer & H. Laufer) 379–394 (Alan R. Liss Inc., 1983).

  3. 3.

    Pener, M. P. & Simpson, S. J. Locust phase polyphenism: An update. Adv. Insect Physiol. 36, 1–286 (2009).

  4. 4.

    Ernst, U. R. et al. Epigenetics and locust life phase transitions. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 88–99 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Hassanali, A., Njagi, P. G. N. & Bashir, M. O. Chemical ecology of locusts and related acridids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50, 223–245 (2005).

  6. 6.

    Pener, M. P. & Yerushalmi, Y. The physiology of locust phase polymorphism: an update. J. Insect Physiol. 44, 365–377 (1998).

  7. 7.

    Wang, X. & Kang, L. Molecular mechanisms of phase change in locusts. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 59, 225–244 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Simpson, S. J. & Sword, G. A. In Phenotypic Plasticity of Insects Mechanisms and Consequences (eds Whitman, D. W. & Ananthakrishnan, T. N.) (Science Publishers, 2009).

  9. 9.

    West-Eberhard, M. J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. (Oxford University Press, 2003).

  10. 10.

    Simpson, S. J., Sword, G. A. & Lo, N. Polyphenism in insects. Curr. Biol. 21, R738–749 (2011).

  11. 11.

    Bradshaw, A. D. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 13, 115–155 (1965).

  12. 12.

    Levins, R. Evolution in Changing Environments. (Princeton University Press, 1968).

  13. 13.

    Scheiner, S. M. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 35–68 (1993).

  14. 14.

    DeWitt, T. J. & Scheiner, S. M. (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004).

  15. 15.

    Murren, C. J. et al. Evolutionary change in continuous reaction norms. Am. Nat. 183, 453–467 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Pigliucci, M. Phenotypic plasticity: Beyond nature and nurture. (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001).

  17. 17.

    Schlichting, C. D. & Pigliucci, M. Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. (Sinauer Associates, Inc., 1998).

  18. 18.

    Stearns, S. C. The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. Bioscience 39, 436–445 (1989).

  19. 19.

    Whitman, D. W. & Ananthakrishnan, T. N. (Science Publishers, Enfield (NH), 2009).

  20. 20.

    Ghalambor, C. K., McKay, J. K., Carroll, S. P. & Reznick, D. N. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct. Ecol. 21, 394–407 (2007).

  21. 21.

    Despland, E. & Simpson, S. J. Surviving the change to warning colouration: density-dependent polyphenism suggests a route for the evolution of aposematism. Chemoecology 15, 69–75 (2005).

  22. 22.

    Sword, G. A. & Simpson, S. J. Is there an intraspecific role for density-dependent colour change in the desert locust? Anim. Behav. 59, 861–870 (2000).

  23. 23.

    Sword, G. A., Simpson, S. J., El Hadi, O. M. & Wilps, H. Density-dependent aposematism in the desert locust. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 63–68 (2000).

  24. 24.

    Guttal, V., Romanczuk, P., Simpson, S. J., Sword, G. A. & Couzin, I. D. Cannibalism can drive the evolution of behavioural phase polyphenism in locusts. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1158–1166 (2012).

  25. 25.

    Despland, E. & Simpson, S. J. Food choices of solitarious and gregarious locusts reflect cryptic and aposematic antipredator strategies. Anim. Behav. 69, 471–479 (2005).

  26. 26.

    Wilson, K. et al. Coping with crowds: density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5471–5475 (2002).

  27. 27.

    Schlichting, C. D. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 667–693 (1986).

  28. 28.

    Woltereck, R. Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen über Artveränderung, speziell über das Wesen quantitativer Artunderscheide bei Daphniden. Ver. Deutsch. Zool. Ges. 1909, 110–172 (1909).

  29. 29.

    Gibert, P., Moreteau, B., David, J. R. & Scheiner, S. M. Describing the evolution of reaction norm shape: Body pigmentation in Drosophila. Evolution 52, 1501–1506 (1998).

  30. 30.

    Sword, G. A. A role of phenotypic plasticity in the evolution of aposematism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1639–1644 (2002).

  31. 31.

    Song, H. Phylogenetic perspectives on the evolution of locust phase polyphenism. J. Orthoptera Res. 14, 235–245 (2005).

  32. 32.

    Song, H. & Wenzel, J. W. Phylogeny of bird-grasshopper subfamily Cyrtacanthacridinae (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and the evolution of locust phase polyphenism. Cladistics 24, 515–542 (2008).

  33. 33.

    Song, H. Density-dependent phase polyphenism in nonmodel locusts: A minireview. Psyche 2011, Article ID 741769, doi:10.1155/2011/741769 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Agrawal, A. A. et al. Evidence for adaptive radiation from a phylogenetic study of plant defenses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18067–18072 (2009).

  35. 35.

    Canfield, M. R., Greene, E., Moreau, C. S., Chen, N. & Pierce, N. E. Exploring phenotypic plasticity and biogeography in emerald moths: A phylogeny of the genus Nemoria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 49, 477–487 (2008).

  36. 36.

    Collard, M. & Wood, B. Hominin homoiology: An assessment of the impact of phenotypic plasticity on phylogenetic analyses of humans and their fossil relatives. J. Hum. Evol. 52, 573–584 (2007).

  37. 37.

    Cook-Patton, S. C. & Agrawal, A. A. Relatedness predicts phenotypic plasticity in plants better than weediness. Evol. Ecol. Res. 13, 527–542 (2011).

  38. 38.

    Forsman, A. Rethinking phenotypic plasticity and its consequences for individuals, populations and species. Heredity 115, 276–284 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Kembel, S. W. & Cahill, J. F. Jr. Plant phenotypic plasticity belowground: A phylogenetic perspective on root foraging trade-offs. Am. Nat. 166, 216–230 (2005).

  40. 40.

    Pfennig, D. W. et al. Phenotypic plasticity’s impacts on diversification and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 459–467 (2010).

  41. 41.

    Pigliucci, M., Cammell, K. & Schmitt, J. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity a comparative approach in the phylogenetic neighbourhood of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Evol. Biol. 12, 779–791 (1999).

  42. 42.

    Van Buskirk, J. A comparative test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: Relationships between habitat and phenotype in anuran larvae. Am. Nat. 160, 87–102 (2002).

  43. 43.

    Doughty, P. Testing the ecological correlates of phenotypically plastic traits within a phylogenetic framework. Acta Oecol. 16, 519–524 (1995).

  44. 44.

    Doughty, P. Statistical analysis of natural experiments in evolutionary biology: Comments on recent criticisms of the use of comparative methods to study adaptation. Am. Nat. 148, 943–956 (1996).

  45. 45.

    Gotthard, K. & Nylin, S. Adaptive plasticity and plasticity as an adaptation: a selective review of plasticity in animal morphology and life history. Oikos 74, 3–17 (1995).

  46. 46.

    Garland, T. Jr. & Adolph, S. C. Why not to do two-species comparative studies: Limitations on inferring adaptation. Physiol. Zool. 67, 797–828 (1994).

  47. 47.

    Dirsh, V. M. Genus Schistocerca (Acridomorpha, Insecta). (Dr. W. Junk B.V. Publishers, The Hague, 1974).

  48. 48.

    Harvey, A. W. A reclassification of the Schistocerca americana complex (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Acrida 10, 61–77 (1981).

  49. 49.

    Duranton, J.-F., Monard, A. & Morales, R. S. Contribution à l'étude de la bio-écologie de deux locustes péruviens, Schistocerca cf. interrita Scudder 1899 et Schistocerca piceifrons peruviana Lynch Arribalzaga 1903 (Orthoptera, Cyrtacanthacridinae). J. Orthoptera Res. 15, 157–169 (2006).

  50. 50.

    Duck, L. G. The bionomics of Schistocerca obscura (Fabr). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 17, 105–119 (1944).

  51. 51.

    Gotham, S. & Song, H. Non-swarming grasshoppers exhibit density-dependent phenotypic plasticity reminiscent of swarming locusts. J. Insect Physiol. 59, 1151–1159 (2013).

  52. 52.

    Kevan, D. K. M. An account of Schistocerca flavofasciata (De Geer 1773) in Trinidad (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 34, 291–310 (1943).

  53. 53.

    Sword, G. A. To be or not to be a locust? A comparative analysis of behavioral phase change in nymphs of Schistocerca americana and S. gregaria. J. Insect Physiol. 49, 709–717 (2003).

  54. 54.

    Antoniou, A. & Robinson, C. J. Laboratory studies on the effect of crowding on phase and the life history of Schistocerca pallens (Thunberg) (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Cyrtacanthacridinae). J. Nat. Hist. 8, 701–715 (1974).

  55. 55.

    Rowell, C. H. F. & Cannis, T. L. Environmental factors affecting the green/brown polymorphism in the cyrtacanthacridine grasshopper Schistocerca vaga (Scudder). Acrida 1, 69–77 (1971).

  56. 56.

    Dirsh, V. M. Acridoidea of the Galapagos Islands (Orthoptera). Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Entomol. 23, 1–51 (1969).

  57. 57.

    Lovejoy, N. R., Mullen, S. P., Sword, G. A., Chapman, R. F. & Harrison, R. G. Ancient trans-Atlantic flight explains locust biogeography: molecular phylogenetics of Schistocerca. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 767–774 (2006).

  58. 58.

    Song, H., Moulton, M. J., Hiatt, K. D. & Whiting, M. F. Uncovering historical signature of mitochondrial DNA hidden in the nuclear genome: the biogeography of Schistocerca revisited. Cladistics 29, 643–662 (2013).

  59. 59.

    Song, H. On the origin of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål) (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Cyrtacanthacridinae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 1641–1648 (2004).

  60. 60.

    Jago, N. D., Antonious, A. & Scott, P. Laboratory evidence showing the separate species status of Schistocerca gregaria, americana and cancellata (Acrididae, Cyrtacanthacridinae). Syst. Entomol. 4, 133–142 (1979).

  61. 61.

    Kevan, D. K. M. Transatlantic travelers. Antenna 13, 12–15 (1989).

  62. 62.

    Lorenz, M. W. Migration and trans-Atlantic flight of locusts. Quat. Int. 196, 4–12 (2009).

  63. 63.

    Ritchie, M. & Pedgley, D. E. Desert locusts cross the Atlantic. Antenna 13, 10–12 (1989).

  64. 64.

    Rosenberg, J. & Burt, P. J. A. Windborne displacements of desert locusts from Africa to the Caribbean and South America. Aerobiologia 15, 167–175 (1999).

  65. 65.

    Song, H. Revision of the Alutacea Group of genus Schistocerca (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Cyrtacanthacridinae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97, 420–436 (2004).

  66. 66.

    Raszick, T. J. & Song, H. The ecotype paradigm: testing the concept in an ecologically divergent grasshopper. Insect Syst. Evol. 47, 363–387 (2016).

  67. 67.

    Pagel, M. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: A general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255, 37–45 (1994).

  68. 68.

    Zhang, Z. et al. Aridification of the Sahara desert caused by Tethys Sea shrinkage during the Late Miocene. Nature 513, 401–404 (2014).

  69. 69.

    Vallé, F., Dupont, L. M., Leroy, S. A. G., Schefuß, E. & Wefer, G. Pliocene environmental change in West Africa and the onset of strong NE trade winds (ODP Sites 659 and 658). Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 414, 403–414 (2014).

  70. 70.

    Dowsett, H. J. et al. Middle Pliocene Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction: PRISM2. (U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 99-535, 1999).

  71. 71.

    Huelsenbeck, J. P., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J. P. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 52, 131–158 (2003).

  72. 72.

    Sword, G. A. Density-dependent warning coloration. Nature 397, 217 (1999).

  73. 73.

    Simpson, S. J., McCaffery, A. R. & Hägele, B. F. A behavioural analysis of phase change in the desert locust. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 74, 461–480 (1999).

  74. 74.

    Roessingh, P. & Simpson, S. J. The time-course of behavioural phase change in nymphs of the desert locust. Schistocerca gregaria. Physiol. Entomol. 19, 191–197 (1994).

  75. 75.

    Simpson, S. J., Despland, E., Hägele, B. F. & Dodgson, T. Gregarious behavior in desert locusts is evoked by touching their back legs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3895–3897 (2001).

  76. 76.

    Bazazi, S. et al. Nutritional state and collective motion: from individuals to mass migration. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 356–363 (2011).

  77. 77.

    Bazazi, S. et al. Collective motion and cannibalism in locust migratory bands. Curr. Biol. 18, 735–739 (2008).

  78. 78.

    Waloff, Z. & Pedgley, D. E. Comparative biogeography and biology of the South American locust, Schistocerca cancellata (Serville), and the South African desert locust, S. gregaria flaviventris (Burmeister) (Orthoptera: Acirididae): a review. Bull. ent. Res. 76, 1–20 (1986).

  79. 79.

    Chapuis, M.-P. et al. Genetic and morphological variation in non-polyphenic southern African populations of the desert locust. Afr. Entomol. 25, 13–23 (2017).

  80. 80.

    Chapuis, M.-P. et al. Subspecific taxonomy of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera: Acrididae), based on molecular and morphological characters. Syst. Entomol. 41, 516–530 (2016).

  81. 81.

    Smith, T. R. & Capinera, J. L. Host preferences and habitat associations of some Florida grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Environ. Entomol. 34, 210–224 (2005).

  82. 82.

    Sword, G. A. & Chapman, R. F. Monophagy in a polyphagous grasshopper. Schistocerca shoshone. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 73, 255–264 (1994).

  83. 83.

    Sword, G. A. & Dopman, E. B. Developmental specialization and geographic structure of host plant use in a polyphagous grasshopper, Schistocerca emarginata (=lineata) (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia 120, 437–445 (1999).

  84. 84.

    Harvey, A. W. Schistocerca piceifrons (Walker) (Orthoptera: Acrididae), the swarming locust of tropical America: a review. Bull. ent. Res. 73, 171–184 (1983).

  85. 85.

    Tawfik, A. I. et al. Identification of the gregarization-associated dark-pigmentotropin in locusts through an albino mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7083–7087 (1999).

  86. 86.

    Tanaka, S. Induction of darkening by corazonins in several species of Orthoptera and their possible presence in ten insect orders. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 35, 509–517 (2000).

  87. 87.

    Sugahara, R., Saeki, S., Jouraku, A., Shiotsuki, T. & Tanaka, S. Knockdown of the corazonin gene reveals its critical role in the control of gregarious characteristics in the desert locust. J. Insect Physiol. 79, 80–87 (2015).

  88. 88.

    Anstey, M. L., Rogers, S. M., Ott, S. R., Burrows, M. & Simpson, S. J. Serotonin mediates behavioral gregarization underlying swarm formation in desert locusts. Science 323, 627–630 (2009).

  89. 89.

    Rogers, S. M. & Ott, S. R. Differential activation of serotonergic neurons during short- and long-term gregarization of desert locusts. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20142062 (2015).

  90. 90.

    Rogers, S. M. et al. Rapid behavioural gregarization in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria entails synchronous changes in both activity and attraction to conspecifics. J. Insect Physiol. 65, 9–26 (2014).

  91. 91.

    Ott, S. R. et al. Critical role for protein kinase A in the acquisition of gregarious behavior in the desert locust. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, E381–E387 (2012).

  92. 92.

    Rogers, S. M. et al. Substantial changes in central nervous system neurotransmitters and neuromodulators accompany phase change in the locust. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 3603–3617 (2004).

  93. 93.

    Tanaka, S. & Nishide, Y. Behavioral phase shift in nymphs of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria: Special attention to attraction/avoidance behaviors and the role of serotonin. J. Insect Physiol. 59, 101–112 (2013).

  94. 94.

    Ma, Z., Guo, W., Guo, X., Wang, X. & Kang, L. Modulation of behavioral phase changes of the migratory locust by the catecholamine metabolic pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3882–3887 (2011).

  95. 95.

    Guo, X., Ma, Z. & Kang, L. Two dopamine receptors play different roles in phase change of the migratory locust. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9, 1–13 (2015).

  96. 96.

    Guo, X., Ma, Z. & Kang, L. Serotonin enhances solitariness in phase transition of the migratory locust. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 1–12 (2013).

  97. 97.

    Hahn, C., Bachmann, L. & Chevreux, B. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads—a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e129 (2013).

  98. 98.

    Bernt, M. et al. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 69, 313–319 (2013).

  99. 99.

    Cameron, S. L. How to sequence and annotate insect mitochondrial genomes for systematic and comparative genomics research. Syst. Entomol. 39, 400–411 (2014).

  100. 100.

    Edgar, R. C. Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).

  101. 101.

    Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Toh, H. & Miyata, T. Mafft version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 511–518 (2005).

  102. 102.

    Vaidya, G., Lohman, D. J. & Meier, R. SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27, 171–180 (2011).

  103. 103.

    Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S. Y. W. & Guindon, S. PartitionFinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1695–1701 (2012).

  104. 104.

    Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P. & Rougemont, J. A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web-Servers. Syst. Biol. 75, 758–771 (2008).

  105. 105.

    Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).

  106. 106.

    Tracer: MCMC Trace Analysis Tool Version v1.5.0 (2003–2009).

  107. 107.

    Miller, M. A. et al. The CIPRES Portals. CIPRES. (http://www.phylo.org/sub_sections/portal, 2011).

  108. 108.

    Zeuner, F. E. Descriptions of new genera and species of fossil Saltatoria (Orthoptera). Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. B Taxon. 6, 154–159 (1937).

  109. 109.

    Parent, C. E., Caccone, A. & Petren, K. Colonization and diversification of Galápagos terrestrial fauna: a phylogenetic and biogeographical synthesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 3347–3361 (2008).

  110. 110.

    BioGeoBEARS: BioGeography with Bayesian (and Likelihood) Evolutionary Analysis in R Scripts (University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2013).

  111. 111.

    R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2017).

  112. 112.

    Revell, L. J. phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank numerous collaborators who provided valuable specimens used in this study: Ludivina Barrientos-Lozano, Asmaa Haggag, Alexandre Latchininsky, Joey Mugleston, Daniel Otte, Daniel Perez-Gelabert, Martina Pocco, Barry Valentine, and Michael Whiting. Field expeditions were conducted by the senior author under permit numbers: CRO 177/08CR and CRO 178/08CR (South Africa), SF007010 (Australia), and VIIS-2013-SCI-0011 (U.S. Virgin Islands). A large number of students and colleagues have contributed to fieldwork, insect rearing, and behavioural assays: Grace Avecilla, Gabriella Fluery, Abby Hudak, Cody Gale, Steve Gotham, Sandor Kelly, Shelby Kilpatrick, Shiala Morales, Ji-Min Noh, Ryan Ridenbaugh, Michael Riley, and Ryan Selking. We thank Gil Wizen for allowing us to use his image in the figure, and Gregory Sword and two anonymous reviewers for reviewing an early draft of the manuscript. This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (grant numbers DEB-1064082 and IOS-1253493 to H.S.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    • Hojun Song
    • , Bert Foquet
    • , Ricardo Mariño-Pérez
    •  & Derek A. Woller

Authors

  1. Search for Hojun Song in:

  2. Search for Bert Foquet in:

  3. Search for Ricardo Mariño-Pérez in:

  4. Search for Derek A. Woller in:

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: H.S. Conducted fieldwork: H.S., B.F., R.M.P., D.A.W. Conducted molecular work: B.F., D.A.W. Analyzed the data: H.S., B.F., R.M.P., D.A.W. Wrote the manuscript: H.S., B.F., R.M.P., D.A.W. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hojun Song.

Electronic supplementary material

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.