Competition between Superconductor – Ferromagnetic stray magnetic fields in YBa2Cu3O7−x films pierced with Co nano-rods


Superconductivity and ferromagnetism are two antagonistic phenomena that combined can lead to a rich phenomenology of interactions, resulting in novel physical properties and unique functionalities. Here we propose an original hybrid system formed by a high-temperature superconducting film, patterned with antidots, and with ferromagnetic nano-rods grown inside them. This particular structure exhibits the synergic influence of superconductor (SC) - ferromagnetic (FM) stray fields, in both the superconducting behaviour of the film and the three-dimensional (3D) magnetic structure of nano-rods. We show that FM stray fields directly influence the critical current density of the superconducting film. Additional functionalities appear due to the interaction of SC stray fields, associated to supercurrent loops, with the non-trivial 3D remanent magnetic structure of FM nano-rods. This work unravels the importance of addressing quantitatively the effect of stray magnetic fields from both, the superconductor and the ferromagnet in hybrid magnetic nano-devices based on high temperature superconductors.


Extensive efforts have been devoted over the past years to explore the interaction of superconductivity and ferromagnetism in hybrid systems, especially at the nanoscale. Unique behaviours have been found by combining these antagonistic phenomena, offering the possibility to obtain new solid state devices1,2,3. The coexistence of these two phases in uniform materials requires singular conditions and occurs only in a limited number of systems4,5,6,7. Multifunctional hybrid materials have been widely explored as an efficient route to design materials, offering an ideal approach to study Superconductor (SC) – Ferromagnetic (FM) interplay. Most of the work performed up to now has focused towards understanding coupling of SC-FM in hybrid systems with conventional low temperature superconductors. In addition to interactions with electronic level and proximity effects8,9,10,11,12, the stray fields originated from FM materials may directly influence the superconducting properties13,14,15,16,17,18. Some of these microscopic mechanisms can be used to modify pinning forces in the SC material and enhance their critical current performance19,20,21,22,23 or tune the pinning potentials to control and manipulate vortex dynamics24,25,26,27,28. For high-temperature superconductors (HTS), much attention has been devoted exploring the possibility to enhance intrinsic flux pinning from the spatial modulation of the local magnetic field in SC-FM multilayers29,30,31 or by incorporating FM inclusions within the SC matrix32. Although hysteretic effects have been observed in hybrid HTS structures induced by SC-FM interactions33,34,35, the present understanding of those systems is very limited. In particular, the self-interaction between the FM magnetization and the magnetic field associated to supercurrents is almost unexplored. In this direction, a novel strategy to generate, modify, and annihilate a large number of singular spin configurations was recently proposed, by combining HTS patterned films with a soft magnetic thin film grown on top36. Control and motion of nanoscale magnetic patterns and domain walls are a hot research topic for its considerable potential in next-generation spintronic devices nowadays37,38,39,40.

The aim of this work is to establish an experimental system in which SC-FM mutual interactions can be studied in a model HTS hybrid system formed by an inhomogeneous superconducting film combined with three-dimensional (3D) ferromagnetic nano-rods. The system designed consists of a YBa2Cu3O7−x (YBCO) film patterned with antidots and filled with ferromagnetic Cobalt (Co) nano-rods piercing the superconducting film. On the one hand, YBCO films are technologically one of the most relevant HTS, possessing many intrinsic defects able to trap high magnetic fields41. On the other hand, Co nano-rods grown by focused electron-beam induced deposition (FEBID), offer the possibility to generate 3D spin textures that could provide a third dimension in controlling magnetic states at the nanoscale42, 43. We have studied mutual interactions coming from both FM nanostructures that induce local inhomogeneous stray fields within the SC matrix, H FM, and trapped stray magnetic fields generated by SC current loops, H SC. This unique system, based on an in-homogeneous HTS thin film, with high intrinsic pinning and patterned with antidots, will induce largely trapped fields, that will be of the order of FM stray fields. Competition between these two magnetic fields give place to explore novel SC-FM interactions which do not appear in other studied systems based on conventional low temperature superconductors, were trapped SC magnetic fields are essentially negligible. We have combined electric transport measurements with transmission X-ray photoemission electron microscopy (T-XPEEM) to elucidate the interplay between competing superconducting and ferromagnetic stray fields. Experimental results are supported by micromagnetic simulations which illustrate the unique potential of FEBID to grow nano-rods with complex 3D remanent magnetization states, that may be modified with SC stray fields.

Results and Discussion

The studies have been performed in a 125 nm YBCO thin film, patterned with three equal transport bridges patterned in a 4-point geometry. We used one bridge as a reference while in the other two we milled an array of circular antidots. These antidots of 200 nm in diameter and about 425 nm in depth (completely perforating the film and part of the substrate) were distributed in a square lattice with inter-dot distance 2 μm (Fig. 1a). In one of the two bridges, the antidot holes where filled with Co nano-rods grown by FEBID, overhanging about 300 nm from both sides of the YBCO layer (Fig. 1b). From now on we will refer to the superconducting system patterned with antidots as SCA and the hybrid system with antidots filled with Co rods as SCA-FMR. A schematic representation of the two YBCO bridges with the applied current and magnetic field directions indicated is shown in Fig. 1c,d. The self-field critical current density of the reference bridge at 65 K, J c sf = 8.4 MA/cm2 was reduced to 3 MA/cm2 and 1.5 MA/cm2 in SCA and SCA-FMR, respectively. The obtained J c sf values, calculated from the full bridge cross section, are lower than the expected ones, according the reduction in the effective cross sectional area due to the presence of antidots. The value of T c is much less affected with a decrease of less than 5 K observed in both cases, indicating that the J c sf reduction is mainly associated to a local amorphization of the material in the area surrounding the antidots and nano-rods.

Figure 1

Sample description. Tilted SEM pictures of YBCO transport bridges patterned with an array of (a) antidots (b) antidots filled with Co nano-rods. (c) and (d) Schematic representation (not at scale) of transport bridges shown in (a) and (b), respectively, with the direction of applied electric current and magnetic field indicated.

Hysteretic Critical current densities

As an aid to understanding the effect of the antidot patterning and the presence of nano-rods in the magnetic field distribution within the YBCO film, we have evaluated the critical current density dependence with magnetic sweep direction. Figure 2 shows the transport critical current density, J c , normalized to its self-field value, as a function of the applied magnetic field, H a , at different temperatures for SCA and SCA-FMR. In both systems, the J c (H a ) curves were measured by applying a maximum field + H a,max in a zero-field cooling process and sweeping it from + µ 0 H a,max =  0.1 T down to - µ 0 H a,max  = − 0.1 T (closed symbols) and back to + µ 0 H a,max (open symbols). We observe that an appreciable hysteresis in J c (H a ) is obtained for the sample with antidots, SCA, (Fig. 2a) that is clearly enhanced in the hybrid SCA-FMR system, due to the presence of FM antidots (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2

Hysteretic behaviour of Jc. Normalized critical current density vs. applied magnetic field at different temperatures for a bridge with (a) antidots and (b) antidots filled with nano-rods, measured by decreasing field (closed symbols) and increasing field (open symbols). Dashed vertical arrows indicate the value of H peak for the J c (H a ) curves measured at 50 K. Upper and lower insets show a schematic representation of trapped stray fields generated by SC loops, H SC, and Co nano-rods, H FM, respectively, in the first quadrant of closed symbols.

In the case of SCA, the hysteretic behaviour in J c can be attributed to an inhomogeneous internal magnetic field distribution within the SC bridge, induced by the presence of antidots. Numerical simulations have been used to evaluate the field in-homogeneities appearing when the film is subjected to different magnetic field sweeps. Our experimental system has been emulated by considering an infinite strip of width, W, with an array of 4 squared antidots of size, a hole  = W/8, simulating the two sequences. In the first one, a perpendicular magnetic field, H a < J c t, is applied to the sample in the virgin state (Fig. 3a), followed by the application of a longitudinal transport current (Fig. 3b). In the second sequence, the applied field is first raised up to a high value to saturate the sample and then decreased back to H a (Fig. 3c). Also in this case the same transport current is applied (Fig. 3d). When increasing H a from the virgin state (Fig. 3a) we observe critical current to penetrate from all of the strip edges. These currents flow in the positive direction at the strip upper half and in the negative direction at its lower half. If the field is further increased and then reversed back to H a , new currents with opposite direction penetrate from the outer edges and SC current loops are generated in the regions between the antidots (Fig. 3c) producing large stray magnetic fields in these regions. The effect of applying a transport current to the sample in sequences (a) and (c) originates opposite bending of the current streamlines, producing very different field distributions at the first dissipation region (region between antidots indicated with dashed lines in Fig. 3a). If in the approximated case of constant J c a significantly different current distribution (so different field distribution) is observed for the two sequences, we can assume that in the case J c (H) dependence the obtained current profile will also be different. Therefore, we predict that a hysteretic behaviour in the J c (H a ) curve will be found for thin film samples with such geometry, as it is experimentally observed. No hysteresis was obtained in the reference bridge, within the experimental resolution (see Supplementary Fig. S1).

Figure 3

Inhomogeneous SC magnetic field distribution. Out-of-plane magnetic field H z (colour scale) and current stream lines (blue lines, arrows indicate direction of current) induced in a thin straight superconducting film, of uniform thickness t, width W and constant critical current J c , with four symmetrical square antidots. For a uniform applied perpendicular positive magnetic field H a  = 0.3K c (being K c  = J c t) (a) after zero field cooled and (c) after applying a positive field to saturate the sample and then decreasing down to H a . (b) and (d) applying a transport current I = 0.7K c W in situation reached in (a) and (c), respectively. Thick black lines separate the regions with H z  < H a from H z  > H a .

We next discuss the hysteresis obtained in the hybrid SCA-FMR system in which two different internal field contributions have to be considered; the one associated to the stray fields trapped inside the patterned superconductor, described above for the SCA system, added to the magnetic field contribution coming from the ferromagnetic nano-rods. According to this, a maximum in J c (H a ) will occur at the applied magnetic field, H peak, that locally compensates both, the average trapped stray field generated by SC current loops, < H SC > , and the average stray field coming from Co nano-rods, < H FM > ; i.e, H peak  < H SC >  +  < H FM > . Insets in Fig. 2 show a schematic representation of the < H SC > and < H FM > stray fields, induced at the positive J c (H a ) branch, after saturating the sample with 0.1 T and sweeping the magnetic field back to zero. The contribution of the superconductor will maintain this sign in the whole J c (H a ) curve measured with a negative sweep (closed symbols), whereas the magnetization coming from the rods will change its sign below their coercive field. However, the qualitative effect of both stray fields in the Jc hysteresis, associated to the SC and magnetic hysteresis loops, will be the same.

Figure 4 shows the temperature evolution of H peak measured for both systems. The points at 90 K have been obtained by measuring the maximum irreversibility field. The inset in Fig. 4 depicts the irreversibility line (IL) obtained for SCA and SCA-FMR by sweeping the external field from a maximum magnetization value of + µ 0 H a,max   =+0.1 T to −0.1 T and back to + 0.1 T. A conventional non hysteretic IL, with maximum T c at zero field, is obtained for SCA, whereas a clear hysteresis is found for the hybrid SCA-FMR system. Trapped magnetic fields generated by SC current loops in SCA, <H SC>, (squares in Fig. 4) are proportional to J c and thus follow a J c (T) dependence. No hysteresis is found at high temperatures (T > 80 K) while a substantial contribution of <H SC > ~2mT is obtained at 50 K. This trapped field behaviour appears similar to that measured in polycrystalline YBCO wires44 granular coated conductors45, 46 and artificial multi-granular YBCO films47, mediated by trapped flux retained by strong active pinning regions in non-homogeneous samples.

Figure 4

Temperature dependence of μ0Hpeak. Magnetic field position of the peak in the critical current density and critical temperature at different temperatures for a bridge with antidots (squares) and antidots filled with nano-rods (circles). Dashed line shows the temperature dependence obtained by sum of squared points and the contribution of nano-rods at high temperature. Inset shows the irreversibility line measured decreasing field (closed symbols) and increasing field (open symbols), for the bridge with antidots (squares) and antidots filled with nano-rods (circles).

For the hybrid SCA-FMR system, we need to consider the additional contribution associated with Co nano-rods stray field, < H FM > , which, according to the large curie temperature of the material (T c  = 1400 K for bulk Co), should be constant in the explored temperature range (from 50 K to 90 K, were T < T c /15), if no contribution of the superconductor is considered. Supplementary Fig. S2, show the dependence of H peak, determined from the maximum of the irreversibility line as a function of the maximum applied field, with no influence of H SC, were a saturation of H FM is observed above 100 mT. Recent M vs. H measurements performed in a Co nanorod of 80 nm of diameter grown by FEBID on top of a nano-squid48 showed temperature independent hysteresis loops (measured from 1 K to 60 K), which were saturated at 70 mT with a coercive field of 60 mT. Previous results obtained in 2D Co nanowires grown by FEBID showed a decrease of the coercive field with the wire diameter49, in agreement with the simulated hysteresis loop shown in Supplementary Figure S2. Thus, a temperature independent contribution of < H FM > , without influence of the superconducting film, would imply a continuous upward shift of H peak vs. temperature by comparing the two systems (dashed line in Fig. 4). This line has been determined from the value of Hpeak evaluated from the shift in the irreversibility line (90 K point). However, a clear deviation from the expected behaviour is obtained, indicating a mutual interaction between SC and FM fields. In the field range where the peak is observed (2–12 mT) the nano-rod magnetization is well below saturation, with a considerable susceptibly (see Supplementary Figure S2). It is, thus, very plausible that the influence of the superconducting stray field, which is strongly temperature dependent, may modify the magnetic state of nano-rods, thus changing < H FM > . We observe that the contribution from < H FM > is strongly enhanced when SC current loops, and the associated stray fields < H SC > , appear to be important in the film (at low temperatures). These results reveal the mutual influence between the superconducting film and the nano-rods. The stray fields generated by SC current loops contribute to change the magnetization of Co nano-rods, increasing their associated stray fields, which at the same time determine the superconducting critical current density behaviour of the system.

Remanent magnetic structure of nano-rods

Individual magnetization structure of a Co nano-rod, piercing the SC film, has been visualized by transmission X-ray photoelectron emission microscopy (T-XPEEM), using X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) as a magnetic contrast mechanism. Figure 5a–d shows the in-plane magnetic domain configuration of a single nano-rod, imaged by shadow contrast T-XPEEM, at different conditions. The geometry of the experiment (radiation impinging the sample at 16° grazing incidence) leads to the formation of a shadow close to the Co rods (Fig. 5e) that can be imaged and analysed by T-XPEEM50,51,52. The intensity at the shadowed areas depends on the absorption of the radiation at the bulk of the rods. Hence, the XMCD contrast appearing at the shadow is representative of the magnetic domain configuration of the bulk of the rod. Figure 5a shows the magnetic contrast obtained at 300 K, in remanence after a maximum applied field of −100 mT. A complex magnetic structure, with different magnetic domains is observed. Micromagnetic simulations have been used to elucidate the origin of this magnetic configuration. Figure 6 shows the simulated remanent state for a Co nano-rod obtained after applying a magnetic field of −100 mT parallel to the nano-rod axis (see the section methods for details). A complex 3D spin structure is found, in agreement with the magnetic contrast observed experimentally. Different magnetic domains are formed as an attempt to reduce the magnetostatic energy, mostly at the extremes of the nano-rod. The formation of this singular 3D magnetic state is induced by the polycrystalline nature of Co nanostructures grown by FEBID42. Two stable magnetic vortex states are formed, one with the core aligned parallel and the other perpendicular to the nano-rod axis (indicated by arrows in Fig. 6a and b respectively). The formation of the perpendicular vortex state is favored by the use of a saturation magnetization, M S , value similar to the pure Co. A reduction of M S , which is typically found in FEBID nanostructures with low Co content42, 53, induces a reduction of the exchange energy and the effect of the magnetostatic energy in the final magnetization configuration is more important. However, we found that even reducing the value of M S to the half of the pure Co a vortex like state parallel to the longest dimension of the nano-rod is still present (see Supplementary Fig. S3).

Figure 5

XMCD magnetic images. Magnetic structure obtained in remanence for a single Co nano-rod (a) at 300 K after a maximum applied field of −100 mT, (b) at 300 K, −50 mT, (c) at 65 K, 50 mT-ZFC, i.e. removing the magnetic field T > Tc, and (d) at 65 K, 50mT-FC, applying and removing the magnetic field at 65 K. The colour bar indicates the direction of the magnetic contrast along the nano-rod axis in arbitrary units. Dotted lines indicate the position of the shadow. (e) Schematic of the T-XPEEM measurement (f) XMCD contrast profiles along the dotted line depicted in the XMCD images.

Figure 6

Micromagnetic simulations. 3D representation of the simulated remanent magnetic state for a Co nano-rod. (a) Magnetization map for a cross-section (rectangle in (c)). (b) and (c) Magnetization map using the magnetic component along (M x ) and perpendicular (M y ) to the nano-rod axis, respectively.

To determine the effect of SC trapped magnetic fields, associated to supercurrent loops, on the stability of magnetic vortex states we compare the remanent magnetization structure of a Co nano-rod piercing the SC film above and below Tc. Figure 5b shows the remanent magnetic state obtained after applying a maximum field of −50 mT at 300 K and Fig. 5c,d at 65 K. In (c) the field was applied at a high temperature and removed above T c (Zero field cool, 65 K-ZFC) whereas in (d) it was applied below T c (Field cool, 65 K-FC). Very similar contrast patterns were obtained in (a), (b), (c) indicating that the nano-rod remanent state does not significantly depend on the temperature, within the range evaluated, as expected considering the Co curie temperature. A different situation occurs when the nano-rod is magnetized at 65 K-FC, where the contribution of the SC trapped magnetic fields has to be considered in the remanent state. In this case (Fig. 5d) the magnetic contrast of the nano-rod is highly reduced. The contrast variation can be better observed by comparing the XMCD profiles shown in Fig. 5f. The obtained reduction of the magnetic signal along the nano-rod in 5 (d) would be consistent with a magnetic structure of a pure vortex state oriented perpendicular to the rod axis52. Micromagnetic simulations indicate that the parallel remanent vortex state disappear with applied magnetic fields of several mT. With this we demonstrate that the 3D nanometric magnetic structure of the Co nano-rods can be modulated by the SC stray fields. Thus, a proper choice of the SC sample geometry, and the associated current loops, could eventually lead to controllable 3D magnetic textures and vortex states at the nanometric scale.

In conclusion we have fabricated and analysed a novel hybrid system, based on a patterned high-pinning, high-temperature superconductor, combined with 3D ferromagnetic nano-rods. Our results demonstrate that such SC-FM hybrids offer the possibility to study mutual interaction between the stray magnetic fields generated due to the presence of SC current loops and the ones associated to the FM magnetization of nano-rods. We show that both the superconducting properties of the SC film and magnetic state of FM nano-rods can be tuned by cooperative non homogenous SC-FM stray fields. The results paved the way toward the ad-hoc design of hybrid systems in which the two stray field competition can yield new functionalities and phenomena such as the possibility of tailoring pinning of vortices in the SC or 3D magnetic domains in the nano-rods.


High-quality YBa2Cu3O7−d films were grown on LaAlO3 single crystal substrate by chemical solution deposition41. Transport bridges of 100 µm-length x 40 µm-width were patterned on the YBCO layer by optical lithography with the standard 4-point geometry. Nanometric antidots were patterned by Ga+ focused ion beam (FIB) lithography using 30 kV and 28 pA of ion beam voltage and current, respectively. Co rods were grown by focused electron beam induced deposition (FEBID) using 5 kV and 1.4 nA of electron beam voltage and current, respectively43, 49, 54. This technique allowed us to deposit locally cobalt nanostructures inside the antidots without damaging the surrounding YBCO matrix. Antidots and Co rods were patterned using a FEI Helios Nanolab 600 dual beam instrument FIB. This instrument is equipped with a field emission gun located along the vertical axis. The Ga+ focused ion beam column is located at 52° with respect to the electron column, and an individual gas injection system for the Co2(CO)8 precursor gas. To avoid residual Co impurities on top of the YBCO film, a soft Ar+ milling process (under 250 V) was carried out in a Sistec equipment using an ion dose of 0.5 mC/cm2, after the growth of the cobalt rods.

Electrical transport measurements were conducted in a Quantum Design 9 T PPMS cryostat with the applied magnetic field, H a , perpendicular to the film plane. The irreversibility line, T irr (H a ), was determined from resistivity versus temperature curves, ρ(T), at different H a by using a criterion of ρ(T irr )/ρ(95 K) = 10−3. For the critical current density determination, J c , we used a criterion of 100 µV/cm.

Numerical simulations based on the Magnetic Energy Minimization model in the critical state55, adapted for the thin film planar geometry56, 57 were used to determine the magnetic field distribution in the patterned YBCO bridge when subjected to an external magnetic field and applied electrical current. Static micromagnetic simulations to determine the magnetic distribution for an individual Co nano-rod were performed using the OOMMF code58. As magnetic parameters we used those that correspond to pure Co: saturation magnetization, μ 0 M S  = 1400 kA/m; exchange constant, A = 30 × 10−12 J/m. The anisotropy constant was neglected (K = 0) because FEBID technique produces polycrystalline Co nanostructures composed by nanocrystals randomly oriented59, so the magneto-crystalline anisotropy does not contribute to the final state of the nano-rod. For these micromagnetic simulations, the three-dimensional shape of a Co nano-rod with length 888 nm long and circular cross-section of 200 nm diameter was built by stacking cubic cells of 5 nm lateral side (magnetic unit cell size). The simulated Co nano-rod has a rounded end with a curvature radius of 100 nm. To simulate the remanent magnetic state, the nano-rod is set in an initial magnetization state where all spins are perfectly aligned along the longest dimension of the rod and the simulation then runs by using a second order predictor corrector until the total energy of the system is minimized.

Magnetic domain imaging of cobalt nano-rods was done using of shadow contrast analysis in transmission X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) and photo-electron emission microscopy (T-XPEEM)50 at the UE-49 PGMa beam-line (Synchrotron BESSY II). Magnetic contrast images were acquired at the Co L3-edge (707.6 eV), for different fields and temperatures. Measurements were performed with the magnetic field applied along the rod axis.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.


  1. 1.

    Velez, M. et al. Superconducting vortex pinning with artificial magnetic nanostructures. J Magn Magn Mater 320, 2547–2562 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Aladyshkin, A. Y., Silhanek, A. V., Gillijns, W. & Moshchalkov, V. V. Nucleation of superconductivity and vortex matter in superconductor-ferromagnet hybrids. Supercond Sci Tech 22, 053001 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Blamire, M. G. & Robinson, J. W. A. The interface between superconductivity and magnetism: understanding and device prospects. Journal of Physics-Condensed Matter 26, 453201 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Drew, A. J. et al. Coexistence of static magnetism and superconductivity in SmFeAsO1−xFx as revealed by muon spin rotation. Nat Mater. 8, 310–314 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Saxena, S. S. et al. Superconductivity on the border of itinerant-electron ferromagnetism in UGe2. Nature. 406, 587–592 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bulaevskii, L. N., Buzdin, A. I., Kulic, M. L. & Panjukov, S. V. Coexistence of Superconductivity and Magnetism - Theoretical predictions and experimental results. Advances in Physics 34, 175–261 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gazquez, J. et al. Emerging Diluted Ferromagnetism in High- Tc Superconductors Driven by Point Defect Clusters. Advanced Science 3, 1500295 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ryazanov, V. V. et al. Coupling of two superconductors through a ferromagnet: Evidence for a pi junction. Phys Rev Lett. 86, 2427–2430 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Drew, A. J. et al. Coexistence and coupling of superconductivity and magnetism in thin film structures. Phys Rev Lett. 95, 197201 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Buzdin, A. I. Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures. Rev Mod Phys. 77, 935–976 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chakhalian, J. et al. Magnetism at the interface between ferromagnetic and superconducting oxides. Nat Phys 2, 244–248 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhu, J. A., Krivorotov, I. N., Halterman, K. & Valls, O. T. Angular Dependence of the Superconducting Transition Temperature in Ferromagnet-Superconductor-Ferromagnet Trilayers. Phys Rev Lett. 105, 207002 (2010).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lyuksyutov, I. F. & Pokrovsky, V. Magnetization controlled superconductivity in a film with magnetic dots. Phys Rev Lett. 81, 2344–2347 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yang, Z. R., Lange, M., Volodin, A., Szymczak, R. & Moshchalkov, V. V. Domain-wall superconductivity in superconductor-ferromagnet hybrids. Nat Mater. 3, 793–798 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fritzsche, J. et al. Local observation of reverse-domain superconductivity in a superconductor-ferromagnet hybrid. Phys Rev Lett. 96, 247003 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Villegas, J. E., Li, C. P. & Schuller, I. K. Bistability in a superconducting al thin film induced by arrays of Fe-nanodot magnetic vortices. Phys Rev Lett. 99, 227001 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Monton, C., Ramos, C. A., Guimpel, J. & Zysler, R. D. Experimental evidence of magnetic anisotropy induction by superconductivity in superlattices. Appl Phys Lett 92, 2912497 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Monton, C., de la Cruz, F. & Guimpel, J. Magnetic behavior of superconductor/ferromagnet superlattices. Phys Rev B. 75, 064508 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gammel, P. L. et al. Enhanced critical currents of superconducting ErNi2B2C in the ferromagnetically ordered state. Phys Rev Lett. 84, 2497–2500 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Palau, A. et al. Hysteretic vortex pinning in superconductor-ferromagnet nanocomposites. Phys Rev Lett. 98, 117003 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Vodolazov, D. Y., Gribkov, B. A., Klimov, A. Y., Rogov, V. V. & Vdovichev, S. N. Strong influence of a magnetic layer on the critical current of Nb bridge in finite magnetic fields due to surface barrier effect. Appl Phys Lett. 94, 012508 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Snezhko, A., Prozorov, T. & Prozorov, R. Magnetic nanoparticles as efficient bulk pinning centers in type-II superconductors. Phys Rev B. 71, 024527 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kim, K., Ozmetin, A. E., Naugle, D. G. & Lyuksyutov, I. F. Flux pinning with a magnetic nanorod array. Appl Phys Lett. 97, 042501 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Martin, J. I., Velez, M., Nogues, J. & Schuller, I. K. Flux pinning in a superconductor by an array of submicrometer magnetic dots. Phys Rev Lett. 79, 1929–1932 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Villegas, J. E. et al. A superconducting reversible rectifier that controls the motion of magnetic flux quanta. Science. 302, 1188–1191 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Vestgarden, J. I. et al. Interaction between superconducting vortices and a bloch wall in ferrite garnet films. Phys Rev Lett. 98, 117002 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hallet, X., Adam, S., Piraux, L., Vanacken, J. & Moshchalkov, V. V. Superconducting properties of perforated NbN films using ordered arrays of ferromagnetic nanowires. Phys Rev B. 84, 144529 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vlasko-Vlasov, V. et al. Domain structure and magnetic pinning in ferromagnetic/superconducting hybrids. Phys Rev B 85, 064505 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jan, D. B. et al. Flux pinning enhancement in ferromagnetic and superconducting thin-film multilayers. Appl Phys Lett. 82, 778–780 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Albrecht, J., Soltan, S. & Habermeier, H. U. Magnetic pinning of flux lines in heterostructures of cuprates and manganites. Phys Rev B. 72, 092502 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chen, C. Z. et al. Robust high-temperature magnetic pinning induced by proximity in YBa2Cu3O7−d/La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 hybrids. J Appl Phys. 109, 073921 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wimbush, S. C. et al. Practical Magnetic Pinning in YBCO. Ieee T Appl Supercon 19, 3148–3151 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Visani, C. et al. Hysteretic magnetic pinning and reversible resistance switching in high-temperature superconductor/ferromagnet multilayers. Phys Rev B 84, 054539 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Touitou, N. et al. Nonsymmetric current-voltage characteristics in ferromagnet/superconductor thin film structures. Appl Phys Lett 85, 1742–1744 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Del-Valle, N., Navau, C., Sanchez, A. & Dinner, R. Transport critical-current density of superconducting films with hysteretic ferromagnetic dots. AIP Advances 2, 022166 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Palau, A. et al. Encoding Magnetic States in Monopole-Like Configurations Using Superconducting Dots. Advanced Science. 3, 1600207 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Parkin, S. S. P., Hayashi, M. & Thomas, L. Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory. Science. 320, 190–194 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Saitoh, E., Miyajima, H., Yamaoka, T. & Tatara, G. Current-induced resonance and mass determination of a single magnetic domain wall. Nature. 432, 203–206 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Thomas, L., Moriya, R., Rettner, C. & Parkin, S. S. P. Dynamics of Magnetic Domain Walls Under Their Own Inertia. Science. 330, 1810–1813 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Torrejon, J., Martinez, E. & Hayashi, M. Tunable inertia of chiral magnetic domain walls. Nature Communications. 7, 13533 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Obradors, X. et al. Growth, nanostructure and vortex pinning in superconducting YBa2Cu3O7−x thin films based on trifluoroacetate solutions. Supercond Sci Tech. 25, 123001 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wolf, D. et al. 3D Magnetic Induction Maps of Nanoscale Materials Revealed by Electron Holographic Tomography. Chemistry of Materials. 27, 6771–6778 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fernandez-Pacheco, A. et al. Three dimensional magnetic nanowires grown by focused electron-beam induced deposition. Scientific Reports. 3, 1492 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Evetts, J. E. & Glowacki, B. A. Relation of Critical Current Irreversibility to Trapped Flux and Microstructure in Polycrystalline YBa2Cu3O7. Cryogenics. 28, 641–649 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Palau, A., Puig, T., Obradors, X. & Jooss, C. Simultaneous determination of grain and grain-boundary critical currents in YBa2Cu3O7−d coated conductors by magnetic measurements. Phys Rev B. 75, 054517 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Palau, A. et al. Simultaneous inductive determination of grain and intergrain critical current densities of YBa2Cu3O7−x coated conductors. Appl Phys Lett. 84, 230–232 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bartolome, E. et al. Artificial magnetic granularity effects on patterned epitaxial YBa2Cu3O7−x thin films. Phys Rev B. 76, 094508 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Martínez-Pérez,  M. J. et al. Unpublished.

  49. 49.

    Fernandez-Pacheco, A. et al. Magnetization reversal in individual cobalt micro- and nanowires grown by focused-electron-beam-induced-deposition. Nanotechnology. 20, 475704 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kimling, J. et al. Photoemission electron microscopy of three-dimensional magnetization configurations in core-shell nanostructures. Phys Rev B. 84, 174406 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    A. Wartelle et al. Transmission XMCD-PEEM imaging of an engineered vertical FEBID cobalt nanowire with a domain wall, arXiv:1702.02083v1.

  52. 52.

    Streubel, R. et al. Magnetism in curved geometries. Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics. 49, 363001 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Serrano-Ramon, L. et al. Ultrasmall Functional Ferromagnetic Nanostructures Grown by Focused Electron-Beam-Induced Deposition. Acs Nano. 5, 7781–7787 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Cordoba, R., Sese, J., De Teresa, J. M. & Ibarra, M. R. High-purity cobalt nanostructures grown by focused-electron-beam-induced deposition at low current. Microelectronic Engineering. 87, 1550–1553 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sanchez, A. & Navau, C. Magnetic properties of finite superconducting cylinders. I. Uniform applied field. Phys Rev B. 64, 214506 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Navau, C., Sanchez, A., Del-Valle, N. & Chen, D. X. Alternating current susceptibility calculations for thin-film superconductors with regions of different critical-current densities. J Appl Phys. 103, 113907 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Via, G., Del-Valle, N., Sanchez, A. & Navau, C. Simultaneous magnetic and transport currents in thin film superconductors within the critical-state approximation. Supercond Sci Tech. 28, 014003 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Donahue, M. J., Porter, D.G., OOMMF User’s Guide, Version 1.0, Interagency Report NISTIR 6376, G. National Institute of Standards and Technology, MD (1999)

  59. 59.

    Cordoba, R. et al. Nanoscale chemical and structural study of Co-based FEBID structures by STEM-EELS and HRTEM. Nanoscale Res Lett. 6, 1–6 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work has been supported by Spanish MINECO and FEDER (MAT2014-51778-C2-1R, CSD2007-0041, MAT2014-51982-C2-1-R and MAT2015-69725-REDT, AT2016-79426-P), Severo Ochoa SEV2015-0496 program, Generalitat de Catalunya (2014-SGR-00753, 2014-SGR-150, 2014-PROD00059), Aragon regional government projects, including FEDER funding, European Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 312284, EU-NMP-LA-2012-280432 EUROTAPES project and Cost Actions MP1201 and CM1301 (CELINA). A. Sanchez acknowledges a grant from ICREA Academia, funded by the Generalitat de Catalunya. We are grateful to I. Rivas and R. Valero from LMA-INA (Zaragoza, Spain) for experimental help in the cobalt growth and Ar+ milling processes, and Dr C. Magén and Dr. P. Algarabel from LMA-INA (Zaragoza, Spain) for facilitating the use of their high performance computing server to perform the micromagnetic simulations. We acknowledge R. Morales from UPV/EHU and Ikerbasque, A. Fernández-Pacheco from U. Cambridge and S. Valencia from Helmholtz-Zentrum, Berlin for fruitful discussions.

Author information




A.P., V.R., C.M., carried out superconducting property measurements and data analysis. R.C. and J.M.D.T. fabricated the devices. L.A.R. performed the micromagnetic simulations. C.N., N.D.V., G. V. and A.S. carried out the superconducting magnetic field simulations and contributed to discussions. F.K. and A.P. performed the synchrotron X-ray experiments. A.P and T.P. designed the hybrid devices and coordinated all the measurements and discussions. V.R, C.M. helped with the system design and fabrication. X.O. contributed to scientific discussions. A.P. prepared the manuscript with contributions from all authors. All authors discussed the results and implications and participated to text revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Palau.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rouco, V., Córdoba, R., De Teresa, J.M. et al. Competition between Superconductor – Ferromagnetic stray magnetic fields in YBa2Cu3O7−x films pierced with Co nano-rods. Sci Rep 7, 5663 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing