Article | Open

Selective mass enhancement close to the quantum critical point in BaFe2(As1−x P x )2

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 4589 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04724-3
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

A quantum critical point (QCP) is currently being conjectured for the BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 system at the critical value x c  ≈ 0.3. In the proximity of a QCP, all thermodynamic and transport properties are expected to scale with a single characteristic energy, given by the quantum fluctuations. Such a universal behavior has not, however, been found in the superconducting upper critical field Hc2. Here we report Hc2 data for epitaxial thin films extracted from the electrical resistance measured in very high magnetic fields up to 67 Tesla. Using a multi-band analysis we find that Hc2 is sensitive to the QCP, implying a significant charge carrier effective mass enhancement at the doping-induced QCP that is essentially band-dependent. Our results point to two qualitatively different groups of electrons in BaFe2(As1−x P x )2. The first one (possibly associated to hot spots or whole Fermi sheets) has a strong mass enhancement at the QCP, and the second one is insensitive to the QCP. The observed duality could also be present in many other quantum critical systems.

Introduction

In most of unconventional superconductors, a quantum critical point (QCP) of charge or spin density wave (CDW/SDW) states lies beneath the superconducting dome1,2,3,4. Low-energy quantum fluctuations in the vicinity of a QCP lead to non-Femi liquid (nFL) behavior in the normal state and a strong enhancement of the effective electron mass (m*). A good example is given by heavy fermion superconductors. In some of these systems the maximum superconducting transition temperature (Tc) coincides with the position of the expected QCP of the magnetic phase4. The presence of a QCP beneath the superconducting dome is evidenced by a strong enhancement of the superconducting specific heat jump ΔC/Tc at Tc and the slope of the upper critical field | H c 2 | = | d H c 2 / d T | normalized by the critical temperature in the vicinity of Tc5.

In multi-band iron-based superconductors (FBS), the maximum of Tc is usually linked to the expected position of a QCP of the SDW phase6. Evidence for a zero-temperature second order magnetic transition with pronounced quantum fluctuations was found for optimally doped BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 by various measurements in the normal state7,8,9,10,11,12. Therefore, it is considered to be a classical example of unconventional superconductivity emerging in the vicinity of a magnetic state13, 14. However, no doping dependence of the scattering rates expected for a QCP scenario was observed in recent angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) studies15. In the superconducting state, a divergent quasiparticle effective mass (m*) above the QCP of the SDW phase was suggested based on specific heat16 and penetration depth measurements17, 18 as well as predicted by theoretical studies19, 20. However, Hc2 at low T and its slope near Tc are insensitive to the QCP21. This behavior is seemingly in contradiction to many other experimental observations. To resolve this puzzle we investigated in detail the temperature dependence of Hc2 for BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 single-crystalline thin films in a wide range of P-doping. The obtained data can be described in an effective two-band model with qualitatively different doping dependences of the Fermi velocities (vF). Namely, vF1 is indeed nearly featureless across the QCP implying a doping independent m 1 . On the other hand, vF2 is strongly doping-dependent, in accord with the almost divergent logarithmic enhancement of m 2 observed in many other experiments.

Results

Electronic phase diagram of BaFe2(As1−x P x )2

BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 epitaxial thin films were grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE)22, 23. The investigated MBE thin films have high crystalline quality with Tc values above 30 K at optimal doping level. Some of the films were prepared by pulsed laser deposition (PLD). The PLD films have slightly reduced Tc at similar doping levels compared to the films prepared by MBE as shown in inset of Fig. 1a. This result is consistent with previous studies24. To construct the phase diagram of our thin films, we analyzed the temperature dependence of the resistivity for various doping levels shown in Fig. 1a. The phase diagrams of the BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 thin films and single crystals14, 25 are shown in Fig. 1b. The whole phase diagram for the thin films prepared on MgO substrates is shifted to lower doping levels compared to that of the single crystals. The shift of the phase diagram, as it was shown in previous studies, is substrate-dependent due to different in-plane strain22, 23, 26,27,28. In particular, the in-plane tensile strain for the films grown on MgO modifies slightly the position of the bands resulting in the observed difference between the phase diagrams of thin films and single crystals28. On the other hand, the amount of strain for the films grown on LaAlO3 (LAO) is negligibly small resulting in the same phase diagram as for single crystals23.

Figure 1
Figure 1

(a) The temperature dependence of the normalized resistivity ρ/ρ 300K of BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 films prepared by MBE. Closed symbols - underdoped, half closed symbols - optimally doped, and open symbols - overdoped samples. Inset: The normalized resistivity traces for BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 thin films with the similar P-doping prepared by PLD and MBE. (b) The phase diagram of BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 thin films (symbols). The data of BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 single crystals (dashed lines)14, 25 are also shown for comparison. The whole phase diagram for the thin films prepared on MgO substrates is shifted to lower doping levels compared to that of the single crystals and films prepared on LAO substrates. The shift of the phase diagram is substrate-dependent due to different in-plane strains. The contour plot of the doping and temperature dependence of the exponent n is obtained from the data shown in Fig. 1a and in ref. 23 assuming ρ = ρ 0 + AT n. The position of the QCP is around x c ~ 0.25 for the films prepared on MgO substrates. The positions of the QCP for the single crystals and films prepared on LAO substrates do nearly coincide at x c ~ 0.30. For further details see text. The doted lines are guides to the eyes.

We assumed that the temperature dependences of the resistivity (Fig. 1a) can be described by ρ = ρ0 + ATn in the normal state above the superconducting and magnetic transition temperatures. This general expression has been frequently employed in the quantum critical region, where n = 1 at the QCP and n = 2 in a Fermi liquid (FL) state8, 14. The contour plot in Fig. 1b illustrates the temperature and doping dependences of the exponent n= T d 2 ρ / d T 2 d ρ / d T +1, as calculated using experimental temperature dependences of the resistivity. In this analysis we exclude the data close to the SDW transition, where d ρ / d T < ˜ 0 (white region in Fig. 1b). The region in the phase diagram with nFL behavior is similar to the single crystals: the exponent n shows a V-shape; however, it shifts to lower doping level. This allows us to estimate the critical doping level for thin films on MgO substrates as x c 0.25±0.03, which is slightly lower than x c 0.3 reported for single crystals14. For the films prepared on LAO substrate we assumed that the position of the QCP coincides with the one for the single crystals due to the close similarity between their phase diagrams as discussed above.

Upper critical field

The temperature dependences of Hc2 for BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 thin films with various doping levels for fields parallel to the c-axis are shown in Fig. 2. The temperature dependence of Hc2 is strongly affected by the amount of doping. To compare the data of samples with different doping levels, we plot the reduced field h c2 = H c2 H c2 T c versus the reduced temperature t = T/Tc in Fig. 2b, where H c2 is the extrapolated slope of Hc2 at Tc. For the strongly overdoped, and slightly underdoped samples, 0.15 < x < 0.21, the experimental hc2 data are close to the prediction of the single-band Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg (WHH) model which includes only the orbital pair-breaking effect29. For other doping levels, the experimental hc2 data deviate from the single band fit. The doping dependence of hc2(0) extrapolated to zero temperature is shown in the inset of Fig. 2b. The hc2(0) values exhibit a broad maximum around optimal doping xc. Additionally, hc2(0) is strongly enhanced in the coexistence state between SC and magnetism, where the SDW transition temperature TN > Tc.

Figure 2
Figure 2

(a) Temperature dependences of the upper critical field H c2 of BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 thin films with various doping levels for the magnetic field applied along the c-axis. Closed symbols - underdoped, half-open symbols - optimally doped, and open symbols - overdoped samples, solid lines - two-band fits. (b) The reduced field h c2 = H c 2 H c 2 T c as a function of T/T c for the data shown in Fig. 2a, solid lines - two-band fits (the same as in Fig. 2a), dashed line - single-band WHH model. The inset shows the doping dependence of the h c2 values extrapolated to T = 0 K. The deviation of the experimental data from the single-band curve indicates a relevance of multi-band effects for the temperature dependencies of H c2. This deviation is doping - dependent as shown in the inset and can be described by a two-band model for a clean superconductor with dominant interband couplings. For further details see text.

The doping evolution of the temperature dependences of Hc2 can be described by the two-band model for a clean superconductor as proposed by Gurevich30, 31 assuming dominant interband coupling, λ 12 λ 21 λ 11 λ 22 , as expected for s± superconductors. The expression for Bc is given in the Supplementary material Eq. S1. A small value of the intraband coupling constants λ11 = λ22 ~ 0.1 affects the resulting Fermi velocities within 10%, only around optimal doping (see Fig. S7) and has a negligible effect for overdoped samples. Therefore, to reduce the number of fitting parameters, we adopted zero intraband pairing constants λ11 = λ22 = 0. In this case, the superconducting transition temperature is related to the coupling constants by T c =1.14 Ω sf e ( 1 / λ 12 λ 21 ) . We considered two different values of the characteristic spin fluctuation energy Ωsf: 100 K and 62 K, in order to take into account  the observed softening of the spin fluctuations spectrum at the QCP32. We assumed also that the paramagnetic pair breaking is negligibly weak, α M 1, as suggested by the small electronic susceptibility of BaFe2(As1−x P x )2, where the Maki parameter α M = 2 1/2 H c2 orb / H p , defined by the ratio between the orbital critical field H c2 orb and the Pauli limiting field Hp, quantifies the strength of the paramagnetic pair breaking (see also the Supplementary material). This assumption is consistent with a relatively small Knight shift of BaFe2(As1−x P x )212. The result of the fit is shown in Fig. 2, and the obtained fitting parameters are given in the Supplementary Tables (Tables S1 and S2).

Discussion

The doping dependencies of | H c2 / T c | 0.5 extrapolated to Tc, and the H c 2 0.5 / T c extrapolated to T = 0 K are shown in Fig. 3a. According to the BCS theory for clean superconductors, these values are proportional to the quasiparticle effective mass (m*). As it was pointed out in ref. 21, | H c 2 / T c | 0.5 should have a peak-like maximum at the QCP of the SDW phase since m* is strongly enhanced near optimal doping on the whole Fermi surface according to various experimental data7, 16, 17. However, this is not the case: | H c 2 / T c | 0.5 and H c2 (0) 0.5 / T c are nearly featureless at optimal doping (xc ~ 0.25) in accord with ref. 21. Both the single crystals and our MBE films have high Tc values of about 30 K at optimal doping indicating similar low impurity scattering rates. The slightly higher | H c 2 / T c | 0.5 values of the single crystals compared to those of the MBE films are probably related to the different experimental methods used for the evaluation of Hc2. Also, Hc2 of the PLD films follows the same trend in spite of a lower Tc and residual resistivity ratio (inset of Fig. 1a) as compared to the MBE films. Therefore, we believe that the observed doping dependence of Hc2 is not affected essentially by impurity scattering rates and related instead mainly to the changes of vF and the coupling constants.

Figure 3
Figure 3

((a) left axis) The normalized slope of the upper critical field ( | H c 2 | / T c ) 0.5 at T c and ((a) right axis) the normalized upper critical field (H c2)0.5/T c extrapolated to T = 0 K using the fits shown in Fig. 2 versus the P-doping level x. Both these quantities are related to the charge carrier effective mass m* as discussed in the text. The single - crystal data are taken from ref. 21. ((b) Left axis) The inversed normalized Fermi velocities v F0/v F1 and v F0/v F2 in a two-band model are obtained from the fits shown in Fig. 2. ((b) Right axis) The normalized effective quasiparticle mass m*/m b obtained from the dHvA data7, 16. The v F0 values are chosen to fit dHvA data, v F0 = 1.3 · 107 and 1.1 · 107 cm s−1 for Ωsf = 100 K and 62 K, respectively. All the data of the thin films grown on LAO, and single- crystal data are shifted by Δx = −0.05 to meet the QCP of the thin films grown on MgO according to Fig. 1b. The solid line is a fit to a phenomenological divergence of the effective mass near a QCP 1 / v F1 m 1+0.87ln(x x c ), refs 8 and 13, with x c = 0.25. The dashed line denotes approximately the P doping value where T c = T N.

Hc2 of multi-band unconventional s-wave superconductors with dominant interband coupling is limited by the largest vF in the usually considered pronounced s±-regime30, 31. Therefore, in the case of a strong vF asymmetry between different bands, the larger Fermi velocity (vF1 in our notation) dominates Hc2 around optimal doping. In this case one can write ( H c 2 / T c ) 0.5 H c 2 (0) 0.5 / T c v F 1 1 m 1 . This explains the observed weak doping dependence of these quantities (Fig. 3). The obtained doping dependences of the (normalized reciprocal) vF1 and vF2 are shown in Fig. 3b. The 1/vF1 values are indeed smaller than 1/vF2 and show a weaker doping dependence. In contrast, 1/vF2 is strongly enhanced around optimal doping. The Ωsf value affects the Fermi velocities quantitatively but their qualitative doping dependence is conserved. The corresponding normalized effective mass m*/mb obtained from the de Haas-van Alphen (dHvA) experiments7, 16 (mb is the quasiparticle mass taken from the band structure calculations) follows the same trend if the small shift of the QCP along the doping axis (Δx = −0.05) due to the strain is taken into account (see Fig. 1b). The logarithmic divergence at xc = 0.25 is an indication for the reduction of vF2 caused by the quantum fluctuations associated with a QCP of the SDW phase8, 16. A strong reduction of vF2 is observed also at x < 0.15 which roughly corresponds to the doping level where TN > Tc (Fig. 1b, see also Tables S1 and S2 in the Supplementary material). This behavior may be associated with the reconstruction of the Fermi surface due to the presence of the coexisting SDW phase15, 33, 34.

Some of the multi-band heavy fermion superconductors show a similar behavior around the magnetic QCP as the BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 system. The measured enhancement of the effective mass depends also essentially on the experimental method35. Also, a seemingly conflicting behavior between the dHvA, ARPES and transport data was discussed for cuprate superconductors around optimal hole doping36. It was proposed that for the suggested nodal electron pocket induced by bidirectional charge order in high fields, the mass enhancement is very anisotropic around the small Fermi surface. It was argued that the corners of that pocket exhibit a large enhancement without any enhancement along the diagonal nodal direction. Such an angle-dependent mass enhancement is interpreted as a destruction of the Landau quasiparticles at ‘hot spots’ on the large Fermi surface at a proximate QCP. Moreover, another recent theoretical work questioned the paradigm of the universal nFL behavior at a QCP37. It was shown that at the nematic QCP the thermodynamics may remain of FL type, while, depending on the Fermi surface geometry, either the entire Fermi surface stays cold, or at most there are ‘hot spots’. Therefore, one may speculate that the complex behavior observed in FBS and in particular for BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 can be related to the superposition of two distinct QCPs associated with the SDW phase and the nematic order38. The evidence for two distinct QCPs was indeed reported for the Ba(Fe1−x Ni x )2As2 system39. Recently, a band-dependent mass enhancement toward the QCP was suggested from the high-field specific heat measurements of overdoped BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 single crystals40. Thus so far, the available experimental data emphasize the relevance of multi-band effects for a proper and complete understanding of the quantum criticality of BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 and related systems. Further experimental and theoretical investigations including possible strong coupling interactions since the suggested bosonic frequencies (spin fluctuations) exceed the superconducting critical temperature by a factor of three,only, retardation effects might be important, would be helpful to develop a microscopic scenario of the QCP for the title compound and other multi-band systems.

Methods

Samples

BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 single crystalline thin films with various P doping levels x were grown by MBE with a background pressure of the order of 10−7 Pa. All elements were supplied from solid sources charged in Knudsen cells. Pure elements were used as sources for Ba, Fe, and As. The P2 flux was supplied from a GaP decomposition source where Ga was removed by two trapping caps placed on the crucible. The details of the sample preparation are given in refs. 22 and 23. Some of the films on MgO (100) substrate were prepared by PLD with a KrF excimer laser (248 nm). In this case, we used polycrystalline BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 as the PLD target material. The preparation process took place in an ultra-high vacuum chamber with a similar base pressure of 10−7 Pa. Before the deposition, the substrate was heated to 850 °C. Then the BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 layer was grown with a laser repetition rate of 3 Hz. The layer thickness was adjusted via the pulse number at constant laser energy. To improve the sample’s homogeneity and thickness gradient, the substrate was rotated during the whole deposition process. Phase purity and crystalline quality of the films were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The c-axis lattice parameters were calculated from the XRD data using the Nelson Riley function. It depends linearly on the P-doping (determined by electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA)) for the films grown on the same substrate23. In this work, we mainly investigated films prepared on MgO (100) substrate. At high doping levels, also several films on LaAlO3 (100) substrate have been used. The P-doping levels given in the paper have been determined using the c-axis lattice parameter values according to the data in ref. 23 as shown in the Supplementary material Fig. S1.

Resistivity measurements

The temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity was measured by a four-contact method in a Quantum Design physical property measurement system (PPMS) in magnetic fields up to 14 T. Examples of the temperature dependence of the resistivity in zero and applied magnetic fields are shown in Supplementary material (Figs. S2S7). The high-field measurements were performed in DC magnetic fields up to 35 T at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL, USA. The high-field transport measurements in pulsed magnetic fields up to 67 T were performed at the Dresden High Magnetic Field Laboratory at HZDR and at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA. The superconducting transition temperature T c , as given in the paper, was determined using Tc,90 as shown in the Supplementary material (Figs. S6 and S7). Other criteria, such as 50% of the normal state resistance, yield qualitatively the same temperature dependence of Hc2. The SDW transition temperature TN was defined as the peak position of the temperature derivative of the resistivity curves in analogy to the procedure applied for bulk single crystals41, see Supplementary material Fig. S2.

The measurements were performed in magnetic fields applied along the crystallographic c-axis of the films, which coincides with the normal direction of the films surface. Therefore, the Hc2 data presented in the paper depend on the in-plane coherence length ξ ab only, which is unaffected by the film thickness Dfilm ~ 100 nm. Additionally, ξ c > d / 2 is satisfied for all doping levels, where d is the spacing between the neighboring FeAs layers. The estimates given in the Supplementary material indicate that the fluctuation effects close to Tc can be neglected in our case. We assume that the transition width is related to small inhomogeneities in the P distribution and to a difference between Hc2(T) and Hirr(T), where Hirr is the irreversibility field. In particular, Hirr(T) is noticeably affected by flux pinning at low temperatures and high magnetic fields. Thus, our consideration of BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 thin films as 3D superconductors and the neglect of 2D corrections and fluctuation effects are indeed justified.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Scalapino, D. J. A common thread: The pairing interaction for unconventional superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383 (2012).

  2. 2.

    Hirschfeld, M. M., Korshunov, P. J. & Mazin, I. I. Gap symmetry and structure of Fe-based superconductors. Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 124508 (2011).

  3. 3.

    Gabovich, A. I., Voitenko, A. M. & Ausloos, M. Charge- and spin-density waves in existing superconductors: competition between cooper pairing and peierls or excitonic instabilities. Physics Reports 367, 583–709 (2002).

  4. 4.

    Gegenwart, Q., Si, P. & Steglich, F. Quantum criticality in heavy-fermion metals. Nat. Phys. 4, 186–197 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Bauer, E. et al. Pressure-induced superconducting state and effective mass enhancement near the antiferromagnetic quantum critical point of CePt2In7. Phys. Rev. B 81, 180507(R) (2010).

  6. 6.

    Johnston, D. C. The puzzle of high temperature superconductivity in layered iron pnictides and chalcogenides. Advances in Physics 59, 803–1061 (2010).

  7. 7.

    Shishido, H. et al. Evolution of the fermi surface of BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 on entering the superconducting dome. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 057008 (2010).

  8. 8.

    Analytis, J. G. et al. Transport near a quantum critical point in BaFe2(As1−x P x )2. Nat. Phys. 3, 194–197 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Hayes, I. M. et al. Scaling between magnetic field and temperature in the high-temperature superconductor BaFe2(As1−x P x )2. Nat. Phys. 12, 916–919, doi:10.1038/nphys3773 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Nakai, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity and antiferromagnetic quantum critical behavior in the isovalent-doped BaFe2(As1−x P x )2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 107003 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Iye, T. et al. Gradual suppression of antiferromagnetism in BaFe2(As1−x P x )2: Zero-temperature evidence for a quantum critical point. Phys. Rev. B 85, 184505 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Nakai, Y. et al. Normal-state spin dynamics in the iron-pnictide superconductors BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 and Ba(FeCo1−x )2As2 probed with NMR measurements. Phys. Rev. B 87, 174507 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Abrahams, E. & Si, Q. Quantum criticality in the iron pnictides and chalcogenides. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 223201 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Shibauchi, A., Carrington, T. & Matsuda, Y. A quantum critical point lying beneath the superconducting dome in iron pnictides. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 113–135 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Fink, J. et al. Non-fermi-liquid scattering rates and anomalous band dispersion in ferropnictides. Phys. Rev. B 92, 201106(R) (2015).

  16. 16.

    Walmsley, P. et al. Quasiparticle mass enhancement close to the quantum critical point in BaFe2(As1−x P x )2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 257002 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Hashimoto, K. et al. A sharp peak of the zero-temperature penetration depth at optimal composition in BaFe2(As1−x P x )2. Science 336, 1554–1557 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Lamhot, Y. et al. Local characterization of superconductivity in BaFe2(As1−x P x )2. Phys. Rev. B 91, 060504(R) (2015).

  19. 19.

    Levchenko, A. et al. Enhancement of the london penetration depth in pnictides at the onset of spin-density-wave order under superconducting dome. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 177003 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Nomoto, T. & Ikeda, H. Effect of magnetic criticality and fermi-surface topology on the magnetic penetration depth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 167001 (2013).

  21. 21.

    Putzke, C. et al. Anomalous critical fields in quantum critical superconductors. Nat. Commun. 5, 5679 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Kurth, F. et al. Unusually high critical current of clean P-doped BaFe2As2 single crystalline thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 072602 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Kawaguchi, T. et al. The strain effect on the superconducting properties of BaFe2(As,P)2 thin films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, 065005 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Sato, H. et al. High critical-current density with less anisotropy in BaFe2(As,P)2 epitaxial thin films: Effect of intentionally grown c-axis vortex-pinning centers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 182603 (2014).

  25. 25.

    Kasahara, S. et al. Evolution from non-fermi- to fermi-liquid transport via isovalent doping in BaFe2(As1−x P x )2 superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 81, 184519 (2010).

  26. 26.

    Iida, K. et al. Strong T c dependence for strained, epitaxial Ba(Fe1−x Co x )2As2 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 192501 (2009).

  27. 27.

    Engelmann, J. et al. Strain induced superconductivity in the parent compound BaFe2As2. Nat. Commun. 4, 2877 (2013).

  28. 28.

    Iida, K. et al. Hall-plot of the phase diagram for Ba(Fe1−x Co x )2As2. Sci. Rep. 6, 28390 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Werthamer, E., Helfand, N. R. & Hohenberg, P. C. Temperature and purity dependence of the superconducting critical field, H c2. III. electron spin and spin-orbit effects. Phys. Rev. 147, 295 (1966).

  30. 30.

    Gurevich, A. Upper critical field and the Fulde-Ferrel-Larkin-Ovchinnikov transition in multiband superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 82, 184504 (2010).

  31. 31.

    Gurevich, A. Iron-based superconductors at high magnetic fields. Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 124501 (2011).

  32. 32.

    C. H. Lee, et al. Universality of the Dispersive Spin-Resonance Mode in Superconducting. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 167002 (2013).

  33. 33.

    Yi, M. et al. Electronic reconstruction through the structural and magnetic transitions in detwinned NaFeAs. New J. of Phys. 14, 073019 (2012).

  34. 34.

    Nakashima, Y. et al. Fermi-surface reconstruction involving two van hove singularities across the antiferromagnetic transition in BaFe2As2. Solid State Commun. 157, 16–20 (2013).

  35. 35.

    Knebel, G. et al. The quantum critical point in CeRhIn5: A resistivity study. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 114704 (2008).

  36. 36.

    Senthil, T. On the mass enhancement near optimal doping in high magnetic fields in the cuprates. arXiv:1410.2096 (2014).

  37. 37.

    Paul, I. & Garst, M. Lattice effects on nematic quantum criticality in metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 227601 (2017).

  38. 38.

    Chowdhury, D. et al. Phase transition beneath the superconducting dome in BaFe2(As1−x P x )2. Phys. Rev. B 92, 081113(R) (2015).

  39. 39.

    Zhou, R. et al. Quantum criticality in electron-doped BaFe2−x Ni x As2. Nature Comm. 4, 2265 (2013).

  40. 40.

    Moir, C. M. et al. Mass enhancement in multiple bands approaching optimal doping in a high-temperature superconductor. arXiv:1608.07510 (2016).

  41. 41.

    Pratt, D. K. et al. Coexistence of competing antiferromagnetic and superconducting phases in the underdoped Ba(Fe0.953Co0.047)2As2 compound using x-ray and neutron scattering techniques. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087001 (2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by DFG (GR 4667/1-1). S.-L.D., D.E., I.C. and I.M. thank the VW foundation for financial support. D.E. also thanks RSCF-DFG Grant. The work at NHMFL was supported by the National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1157490 and the State of Florida. K.I. acknowledges the Open Partnership Joint Projects of JSPS Bilateral Joint Research Projects. We acknowledge the support of the HLD at HZDR, member of the European Magnetic Field Laboratory (EMFL). I.C. and I.M. thank the support RSF, grant No. 16-42-01100 and RFBR grant No. 15-03-99628a. We acknowledge fruitful discussions with D. Daghero, C. H. Lee, T. Terashima and J. Wosnitza. The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Fund of the Leibniz Association.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Solid State Physics, TU Dresden, 01069, Dresden, Germany

    • V. Grinenko
    •  & F. Kurth
  2. IFW Dresden, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 01069, Dresden, Germany

    • V. Grinenko
    • , K. Iida
    • , F. Kurth
    • , D. V. Efremov
    • , S.-L. Drechsler
    • , I. Morozov
    • , J. Hänisch
    •  & R. Hühne
  3. Department of Crystalline Materials Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8603, Japan

    • V. Grinenko
    • , K. Iida
    • , I. Nakamura
    • , R. Fujimoto
    • , T. Hatano
    •  & H. Ikuta
  4. Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

    • I. Cherniavskii
    •  & I. Morozov
  5. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Technical Physics, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany

    • J. Hänisch
  6. Hochfeld-Magnetlabor Dresden (HLD-EMFL), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01314, Dresden, Germany

    • T. Förster
  7. NHMFL, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32310, USA

    • C. Tarantini
    •  & J. Jaroszynski
  8. MPA-CMMS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA

    • B. Maiorov
    •  & M. Jaime
  9. Department of Applied Physics, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Nakacho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184-8588, Japan

    • A. Yamamoto

Authors

  1. Search for V. Grinenko in:

  2. Search for K. Iida in:

  3. Search for F. Kurth in:

  4. Search for D. V. Efremov in:

  5. Search for S.-L. Drechsler in:

  6. Search for I. Cherniavskii in:

  7. Search for I. Morozov in:

  8. Search for J. Hänisch in:

  9. Search for T. Förster in:

  10. Search for C. Tarantini in:

  11. Search for J. Jaroszynski in:

  12. Search for B. Maiorov in:

  13. Search for M. Jaime in:

  14. Search for A. Yamamoto in:

  15. Search for I. Nakamura in:

  16. Search for R. Fujimoto in:

  17. Search for T. Hatano in:

  18. Search for H. Ikuta in:

  19. Search for R. Hühne in:

Contributions

V.G., K.I. and F.K. designed the study. V.G. analyzed Hc2 data, and wrote the manuscript. D.V.E. and S.-L.D. provided theoretical support in data analysis. I.C., I.M. and A.Y. prepared the PLD targets. Thin PLD films were prepared by V.G., K.I. and F.K. High-field measurements were performed by J.H., T.F., C.T., J.J., B.M., M.J., F.K., K.I. and V.G. V.G. performed transport measurements at magnetic fields up to 14 T. I.N., R.F., T.H. and H.I. prepared and characterized MBE thin films. K.I., J.H., H.I. and R.H. supervised the project. All authors discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Grinenko.

Electronic supplementary material

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.