Nitrogen enrichment impacts on boreal litter decomposition are driven by changes in soil microbiota rather than litter quality

Abstract

In nitrogen (N) limited boreal forests, N enrichment can impact litter decomposition by affecting litter quality and by changing the soil environment where litter decomposes. We investigated the importance of litter quality and soil factors on litter decomposition using a 2-year reciprocal transplant experiment for Picea abies needle litter, derived from plots subjected to 17 years of N addition, including control, low and high N treatments (ambient, 12.5 and 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1, respectively). Our data show that changes in soil factors were the main pathway through which N impacted litter decomposition, with rates reduced by ~15% when placed in high N relative to control plots, regardless of litter origin. Litter decomposition was correlated to soil microbiota, with Picea abies litter decomposition positively correlated with gram negative and fungal functional groups. Our results suggest that previous findings of increase soil C accumulation in response to N deposition is likely to occur as a result of changes in soil microbiota rather than altered litter quality.

Introduction

Anthropogenic activities have increased global emissions of reactive nitrogen (Nr), which have resulted in higher rates of atmospheric Nr deposition1. Net primary production in boreal and temperate forests is often limited by N availability2,3,4,5, primarily because biological N2 fixation and soil mineralization rates are very low6, 7. Thus, there has been substantial speculation and interest in whether atmospheric Nr deposition could promote C uptake in these N-limited forest environments. There is increasing evidence that Nr deposition enhances carbon (C) pools in both vegetation and soils in N-limited ecosystems. While enhanced aboveground biomass in response to Nr deposition is fairly easy to explain (i.e. growth is enhanced because it is limited by N), it remains unclear why soil C stocks increase in response to N. Soil C pools are of particular interest in northern forests because they are often larger and more stable than C in standing vegetation (e.g. 3–6 fold greater in boreal forests)8. Thus, understanding why soil C accumulates in response to N is important for understanding the forest ecosystem long-term capacity to take up and store C5, and thus to mitigate increasing anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

Litter decomposition is one of the key processes that influences soil C accumulation in forests. Nitrogen deposition can impact litter decomposition by altering the quality of litter per se, as a result of an increase of N plant uptake9, 10. It is well established that plant litters having high C:N, lignin:N or lignin:cellulose ratios are more decay resistant11, 12, thus any shift in litter stoichiometry in response to N enrichment may affect litter decomposition13. In addition to litter quality changes, N enrichment can also impact litter decomposition by altering the soil environment where litter decomposes. For example, N may change soil biological activity by altering the total microbial biomass, relative abundance of fungi versus bacteria, or their enzymatic activities2, 14. A negative impact of N on soil biota (e.g. shift in soil biota composition, alteration in microbial activity) could thereby decrease litter decomposition and lead to enhanced soil C accumulation rates15, 16. Thus, anthropogenic N has the potential to simultaneously impact both litter quality and soil biota, however, the relative impact of these responses on plant litter decomposition are poorly understood, and have seldom been investigated in long-term experiments where realistic atmospheric N deposition rates have been simulated.

In this study, we utilized a 17-year N addition experiment in the boreal zone of Northern Sweden. We set up a 2-year reciprocal transplantation experiment to investigate how litter decomposition of Picea abies, a typical boreal coniferous tree and largest source of litter at our study site, responded to chronic Nr enrichment. Specifically, we sought to understand whether some specific soil properties and/or litter quality properties served as main drivers of litter decomposition in response to anthropogenic N enrichment. We used a long-term replicated N addition experiment consisting of control plots, and two N addition levels, 12.5 (low N treatment) and 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1 (high N treatment)17. The low N treatment is quantitatively similar to upper level Nr deposition rates in the boreal region18 and therefore, our study system serves as a useful tool to investigate the mechanisms through which Nr deposition alters litter decomposition in the boreal region. We tested the following hypotheses: (i) That potential changes in litter quality caused by N enrichment will lead to reduced decomposition rates of the most abundant evergreen species (P. abies) in our study system, and (ii) that N enrichment caused changes in soil biota (e.g. reduced total and fungal biomasses) will lead to reduced decomposition rates. By testing these hypotheses together, our study provides a rare opportunity to separate the relative effect of two pathway mechanisms that have been proposed to influence soil C accumulation in N limited northern forest environments2, 4.

Results

Litter mass loss was significantly affected by the main effects of soil destination and time (Table 1, Fig. 1a). The litter decomposition significantly declined by ~15% and non-significantly declined by ~7% when located in the high N (50 kg N ha−1 yr−1) and low N (12.5 kg N ha−1 yr−1) plots relative to the control plots, respectively, regardless of the litter origin (Fig. 1a; Table 1). The soil destination effect was mainly due to a significant decline of the litter mass loss during the first year of decomposition, where the litter decomposed significantly slower by ~11% and non-significantly slower by ~6% in the high N and low N treatment plots relative to the control, respectively. There was a significant time effect because the mass loss was more important during the first year compared to the second year of decomposition. Litter origin had no significant effect on litter mass loss for either sampling time (Table 1, Fig. 1b).

Table 1 The F-values, degrees of freedom (df), and P-values from a repeated-measures ANOVA evaluating the effect of soil destination (S), litter origin (L), sampling time (T) and their interactive effects, on litter mass loss across three simulated chronic N deposition treatments (0, 12.5, and 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1).
Figure 1
figure1

The mean (±SE) mass loss of Picea abies litter after decomposing for one (open bars) or two (hatched bars) years in three soil destinations (a) or three litter origins (b). The soil destinations and litter origins consisted of replicated plots (n = 5) treated with three different N addition levels (0, 12.5 and 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1). Different capital letters (A or B) on top of each panel groups of two bars are significant differences between treatments regardless time, while different lower case letters (a or b) on top of each group of bars indicate significant differences between treatments determined using Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc tests.

Variation partitioning analysis showed that the variation of litter decomposed in the control plots was mainly explained by fungal (24–34%) and actinomycetes (4–26%) PLFA biomasses, as well as the litter’s % lignin (0–18%) and % cellulose (13–24%) (Fig. 2). The variation of litter decomposed in the low N treatment plots was mainly explained by fungal (53–61%), actinomycetes (9–12%) and bacterial (0–12%) PLFA biomasses as well as the litter’s % cellulose (4–10%). The % N factor explained only a small percentage of the variation in litter decomposed in both control and low N plots. The variation of litter decomposed in the high N treatment plots was poorly explained by the soil biota (1–8%) and litter quality (6–13%) factors.

Figure 2
figure2

Variance partitioning (%) in litter decomposed in control, low N (12.5 kg N ha−1 yr−1) and high N (50 kg N ha−1 yr−1) treated plots during one and two years, explained by soil biota factors: fungal, actinomycetes, bacterial PLFAs and litter quality factors: % nitrogen, % lignin and % cellulose.

The RDA analysis using Monte Carlo permutation tests showed that significant differences in PLFA markers were present among the N treatments (P-1st axis = 0.012; P-2nd axis = 0.007), while litter parameters showed no significant differences among N addition treatments (P-1st axis = 0.096; P-2nd axis = 0.159). The PCA analysis describing the soil microbial PLFA marker data set had 49.3% and 22.9% of the total variation explained by the first and second axis, respectively (Fig. 3a). The primary drivers of the first PCA axis were the fungal PLFA markers (18:2 ɷ6), the actinomycete PLFA markers (10me16:0, 10me17:0, 10me18:0) and the gram positive PLFA markers (i-16:0, α-15:0, α-17:0). Meanwhile, the second axis was driven by the gram negative PLFA markers (16:1ɷ7, 18:1ɷ7 and cy-19:0), the arbuscular fungal PLFA marker (16:1ɷ5), and general microbial markers (18:1ɷ9 and 17:1ɷ8). The fungal functional group was negatively related to the control and low N plots, while the gram positive and actinomycete functional groups were positively related to the high N plots. The PCA analysis describing the litter parameter data set had 52.1% and 41.6% of the total variation explained by the first and second axis, respectively (Fig. 3b). The primary drivers of the first PCA axis was the % lignin, whereas the % C, N and P were poorly related to the first axis. Meanwhile, the second axis was driven by the % cellulose and hemi-cellulose. The control and low N plots were overlapping on the biplot-PCA (Fig. 3b), while the % lignin was positively related to the high N plots.

Figure 3
figure3

Principal component analysis (PCA) of phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) microbial markers (a) and litter quality parameters (b). In both sub-panels circles depict N addition treatments (yellow = control; light green = low N, 12.5 kg N ha−1 yr−1; dark green = high N, 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1). Small circles indicate individual plots, and large circles indicate the average PCA position for each treatment. In sub-panel a, only the best fitting microbial markers are represented.

Litter mass loss was mainly driven by microbial PLFA markers than litter quality parameters (Fig. 4, Table S1). The primary drivers of the first RDA axis (P-1st axis = 0.002) were the gram negative PLFA marker (cy-19:0) and general microbial PLFA marker (20:0 and 14:0), while the gram negative PLFA marker (16:1ɷ7c) and the general microbial markers (18:1ɷ9 and 17:0) drove both the first and second RDA axes. Meanwhile, the second axis (P-1st axis = 0.002) mostly driven by the fungal PLFA marker (18:2ɷ6), the C:P litter ratio and the general microbial marker (br18:0). The first year of litter mass loss was most positively associated with gram negative PLFA markers (cy-19:0 and 16:1ɷ7c), the fungal PLFA marker (18:2ɷ6), general microbial PLFA marker (18:1 and 18:1ɷ9) and negatively correlated with the general microbial PLFA markers (20:0, 17:0 and 14:0). The second year of litter mass loss was most positively associated with general microbial PLFA markers (18:1, br18:0 and 18:1ɷ9), gram negative PLFA markers (cy-19:0 and 16:1ɷ7c) and negatively correlated with several other general microbial PLFA markers (20:0, 17:0 and 14:0) and the C:P litter ratio. In summary, both litter mass loss of year 1 and 2 were associated with numerous soil microbial PLFA parameters, and were rarely associated with litter quality parameters.

Figure 4
figure4

Redundancy analysis (RDA) of 1 and 2 year litter mass loss during a decomposition assay, phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) microbial markers, and litter quality parameters as affected by three N addition treatments (control, 12.5, and 50 kg N ha-1 yr-1). For clarity, only the best fitting explanatory variables are represented. Gram negative functional group are represented by a bar and fungal functional group by a star.

Discussion

Our aim was to investigate how litter decomposition of a common coniferous tree species in boreal forests responded to anthropogenic N enrichment, and to distinguish the relative importance of altered soil microbiota and litter quality factors as drivers of litter decomposition. To our knowledge, our study system is the longest running experiment to simulate realistic levels of atmospheric N deposition in the boreal biome (≤12.5 kg N ha−1 yr−1)18, 19, providing us a unique opportunity to explore the mechanisms through which chronic N deposition affects litter decomposition, and thus soil C sequestration.

Contrary to our first hypothesis, decomposition of P. abies litter was unresponsive to litter origin, suggesting that N induced changes in litter chemistry were either too small to have a large impact on decomposition, or that litter quality in general had a minor impact on decomposition relative to other factors. In support of this point, multivariate analyses (i.e. RDA, PCA) showed no clear differences in litter parameters among N addition treatments (i.e. for litter origin); and nor any association between litter parameters and litter mass loss during the first and second year of decomposition. Despite litter origin having no significant impact on litter decomposition, the variation in the P. abies litter mass loss induced by the N addition treatments was partly explained by random variation in the initial cellulose and lignin content of the litter. Our findings are consistent with lignin and its associated ratios (e.g. lignin:cellulose) that have been shown to be good predictors of litter decomposition rates as lignin is a more recalcitrant plant compound than cellulose12, 13. While litter quality parameters per se were important in predicting random variation in litter decomposition, altered litter quality was not a significant mechanisms through which N addition caused a shift in litter decomposition rates in our study system.

In support of our second hypothesis, soil destination showed a significant main effect on litter decomposition, whereby litter placed in the high N plots decomposed significantly slower (i.e. 15%) relative to the control plots, while the litter placed in the low N plots decomposed non-significantly slower by 7%. This effect was significant on average across sampling times, but was particularly strong for P. abies litter after one year of decomposition. Further, support for our second hypothesis was provided by significant relationships between litter mass loss and soil biota. Interestingly, litter mass loss was positively correlated with gram negative and fungal biomasses during the first year of decomposition. Further, the variation in the litter mass loss induced by the N addition treatments was mainly explained by the soil fungal biomass when the litter decomposed in the control and the low N plots. This latter point was also supported by an association between the soil fungal functional group and the control and low N addition treatments in the PCA, while all bacterial functional groups were associated with the high N addition treatment. In contrast, the variation in the litter mass loss induced by the high N addition treatment was poorly explained by the soil biota groups significant in our study. This could be due to other factors that has not been measured e.g. changes in plant community structure, with a decline of bryophyte and ericaceous shrubs cover20,21,22 as well as an increase of Norway spruce tree volume23 in response to long-term 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1 that may change the microclimate where the litter decomposed.

Our data are consistent with soil fungi being well known to dominate the soil microbial community compared to bacteria in boreal forest ecosystems24, 25. Several studies have shown a decrease in fungal biomass and enzymatic activities in response to N fertilization2, 14, 26. The decomposition of coniferous plant litter requires an arsenal of both hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes to degrade litter tissue compounds (e.g. lignin, cellulose and hemi-cellulose)27, 28, thus any shift or decline in soil fungi may explain our observed decline in litter decomposition with N addition, as well as the reduced contribution of fungi in explaining variation in decomposition within the high N plots.

While our study evaluated litter decomposition during only 2 years, the litter achieved nearly 50% mass loss during this period. Norway spruce litter decomposition has been estimated to reach a limit value (i.e. the point at which the mass loss approaches a final value that follow an asymptotic function) of ca. 61–68% of the mass loss in boreal ecosystems28, 29. Thus, our 2-year litter decomposition experiment covered approximately 66–74% of the limit value and likely included some later stage decomposition in addition to the entire early stages of decomposition. Although our study was not able to explicitly inform on the later stages of decomposition, some work has suggested that nutrient enrichment effects on microbial community composition can effect both early and late stages of decomposition30, 31. For instance, Hobbie et al.30 showed that early litter decomposition stages were associated with an increase of microbial enzymatic activity as well as gram positive and negative abundances in response to N addition while they observed a decline of both microbial enzymatic activity and gram positive and negative abundances during later decomposition stages in a deciduous forest.

Our results have implications for understanding how N deposition can impact C accumulation in boreal soils2, 5, which are known to serve as an important sink in the global C cycle. First, we show that N enrichment effects on litter quality did not cause discernable changes in litter decomposition; whereas, changes in soil microbiota strongly influenced early stage decomposition rates, regardless of any effect that N may have had on litter quality. Secondly, our data suggest that decomposition decline in response to N deposition, which correspond to decreases of litter decomposition by 2.14% and 4.34% per year in the low and high N addition treatment relative to the control, respectively. Studies conducted in the same experimental site showed that 16 years of N addition increased the organic soil C in both N addition treatments2, while contemporary aboveground litter inputs were little affected by N addition20. As such, our identification of one of the key mechanisms through which anthropogenic N deposition impact litter decomposition may improve current modelling of ecosystem C dynamics in response to anthropogenic N enrichment. Further, our findings suggest that future research focused on soil C responses to N should investigate further how N alters microbial community composition and biomass, and the enzymatic processes they drive.

Methods

This study was performed at Svartberget Experimental Forest (64°14′N, 19°46′E) in the middle boreal zone, near Vindeln, Sweden32. The forest site consists of a late successional (~120 years old) closed canopy Norway spruce forest (Picea Abies (L.) Karst.). The understory vegetation is dominated by the ericaceous species, namely Vaccinium myrtillus L3, and a moss layer consisting of Hylocomium splendens (Hedw.) B.S.G, Pleurozium schreberi (Bird), and Ptilium crista-castrensis (Hedw.). Soils at the site are podzols formed from glacial till33. The background atmospheric Nr deposition rate in the area is approximately 2 kg N ha−1 yr−134 and the mean annual precipitation is 583 mm. In 1996, a long-term N addition experiment was set up at the site, consisting of a randomized-block design of 0.5 ha plots (n = 5) assigned to one of three N addition treatments: 0 (control), 12.5 (low N treatment) or 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1 (high N treatment)17, 35. The low N treatment was chosen to simulate the upper level N deposition rate in the boreal zone18, 19, while the high N treatment has been chosen as a useful comparison with many previous boreal forest fertilization experiments4. The N addition treatments have been applied since 1996 by manually spreading ammonium nitrate granules each year after snow melt (i.e. May).

Using litter traps, we collected Picea abies needle litter monthly between the start of June 2012 and the end of May 2013 in each plot. Norway spruce litter was chosen as main subject of the study because a previous study showed it was the most abundant litter category in our study system20. The collected litter was air-dried and thoroughly homogenized. Litter Subsamples were used to estimate the moisture content as well to characterize the litter chemistry (i.e. % C, % N, % P, % lignin, % cellulose, % hemi-cellulose). Picea abies litter was placed in nylon cloth material (8 × 7 cm) with mesh size of 0.3 × 0.1 mm, as done in numerous other studies36, 37. The litter bags contained a dry mass of 2.00 g dry weight of Picea abies litter.

In autumn 2013 (17 years after the start of N treatments), in order to study whether litter quality and/or soil environment mediated by N addition contribute to aboveground litter decomposition, a reciprocal transplant experiment was set up with P. abies litter bags originated from each N treatment (control, low and high N treatments). Two litter bags were then placed back in the plot they originated from, as well as within each of the other N treatments within the same block. The litter bags were pinned to the forest floor with plastic sticks in October, and were collected after one and two years of incubation (i.e. autumn 2014 and 2015). This design resulted in a total of 90 litter bags (3 litter origins × 3 soil destinations × 2 durations). After collection, the litter bags were oven dried at 60 °C for 48 h to prevent further decomposition and weighted. Litter mass loss for each species was expressed as relative mass loss (% mass loss).

Soil biota characteristics were derived from a previous study in our experimental site2. Soil biota of each treatment were analyzed from the humus layer using a modified method of Bligh and Dyer on microbial phospholipid fatty acids method (PLFA)38,39,40. Soil microbial PLFA markers were allocated to functional groups: fungal (i.e. correlated to ectomycorrhizae), AM fungi (i.e. arbuscular mycorrhizae), bacterial, actinomycete, gram positive and gram negative following the nomenclature described in Frostegård et al. (2010). Litter parameters such as plant C and N concentrations were analyzed by dry combustion using an elemental analyzer (LECO TruSpec CN analyzer; St. Joseph, MI, USA)2, 20, while total P content of plant litter was analyzed by acid digestion (Auto Analyzer III Spectrophotometer, Omniprocess, Germany). Lignin, cellulose and hemi-cellulose litter contents were also analyzed by acid digestion and calcination all performed by the Soil, Water and Plant Testing Laboratory, Colorado State University, USA20.

In order to describe both soil microbial and litter parameter data sets, we first performed a detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) to be able to choose between linear and unimodal methods. The gradient length were 0.2 SD-units and 1.1 SD-units, respectively, we thus used linear methods. We first performed partial redundancy analyses (RDA) with block as a random factor with Euclidean distance matrices using a Monte Carlo Permutation test (n = 999, α = 0.05) in order to determine whether multivariate differences in the overall PLFA signatures and in the litter parameter data sets (i.e. dependent variables) occurred in response to the N addition treatments (i.e. independent variable). We then performed PCA analyses (type I scaling-distance biplot) to summarize both soil microbiota and litter data sets. Microbial community structure was characterized by performing a PCA on the log-transformed PLFA biomarkers (relative proportion as % of the total), while litter parameters were log transformed. We also performed a variation partitioning analysis to determine the relative importance of soil microbiota biomass (i.e. fungi, actinomycetes, bacteria) and litter quality parameters (i.e. lignin, cellulose and N) on P.abies litter decomposition. The percentage of each variable was determined using the pamer.fnc function within the LMERConvenienceFunctions R package41. To determine how soil microbial community and litter chemistry were driven the litter mass loss during year 1 and 2, we used an RDA with litter mass loss from year 1 and year 2 as dependent variables and microbial and litter parameters as independent variables (type II scaling-correlation plot). The explanatory variables were selected by forward selection and retained when significant amount of variance was explained (α < 0.05)42. All multivariate analyses examining relationships between environmental and response variables were interpreted according to Šmilauer & Lepš (2014)43.

All response variables were first tested for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test prior to statistical analyses. Homoscedasticity was testing using Levine´s test on the residuals of the statistical model. Litter mass loss was analyzed using a repeated-measures mixed model in which soil destination, litter origin and time were used as fixed factors (α = 0.05). Block was used as a random factor. When significant differences between N addition levels were detected (α = 0.05), post hoc pairwise comparisons between treatments were conducted using the Student-Keuls test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (v. 22.0) and R (v. 3.2.3), while multivariate analyses were performed with CANOCO (v. 5.0).

References

  1. 1.

    IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013).

  2. 2.

    Maaroufi, N. I. et al. Anthropogenic nitrogen deposition enhances carbon sequestration in boreal soils. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 3169–3180 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gundale, M. J., From, F., Bach, L. H. & Nordin, A. Anthropogenic nitrogen deposition in boreal forests has a minor impact on the global carbon cycle. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 276–286 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hyvönen, R. et al. Impact of long-term nitrogen addition on carbon stocks in trees and soils in northern Europe. Biogeochemistry 89, 121–137 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    de Vries, W., Du, E. & Butterbach-Bahl, K. Short and long-term impacts of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 9–10, 90–104 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Vitousek, P. M. & Howarth, R. W. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13, 87–115 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lindo, Z., Nilsson, M.-C. & Gundale, M. J. Bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations as regulators of the northern latitude carbon balance in response to global change. Glob. Chang. Biol 19, 2022–35 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lal, R. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For. Ecol. Manage. 220, 242–258 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Knorr, M., Frey, S. D. & Curtis, P. S. Nitrogen additions and litter decomposition: a meta-analysis. Ecology 86, 3252–3257 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Berg, B. & Matzner, E. Effect of N deposition on decomposition of plant litter and soil organic matter in forest systems. Environ. Rev. 5, 1–25 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang, D. Q., Hui, D. F., Luo, Y. Q. & Zhou, G. Y. Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J. Plant Ecol. 1, 85–93 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Entry, J. A. & Backman, C. B. Influence of carbon and nitrogen on cellulose and lignin degradation in forest soils. Can. J. For. Res. 25, 1231–1236 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Prescott, C. E. Litter decomposition: What controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry 101, 133–149 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Janssens, I. A. et al. Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition. Nat. Geosci. 3, 315–322 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Freedman, Z. B., Upchurch, R. A., Zak, D. R. & Cline, L. C. Anthropogenic N deposition slows decay by favoring bacterial metabolism: Insights from metagenomic analyses. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1–11 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Freedman, Z. B., Romanowicz, K. J., Upchurch, R. A. & Zak, D. R. Differential responses of total and active soil microbial communities to long-term experimental N deposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 90, 275–282 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nordin, A., Strengbom, J., Witzell, J., Näsholm, T. & Ericson, L. Nitrogen Deposition and the Biodiversity of Boreal Forests: Implications for the Nitrogen Critical Load. Ambio 34, 20–24 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dentener, F. et al. Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: A multimodel evaluation. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 20, 1–21 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gundale, M. J., Deluca, T. H. & Nordin, A. Bryophytes attenuate anthropogenic nitrogen inputs in boreal forests. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 2743–2753 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Maaroufi, N. I., Nordin, A., Palmqvist, K. & Gundale, M. J. Chronic Nitrogen Deposition Has a Minor Effect on the Quantity and Quality of Aboveground Litter in a Boreal Forest. PLoS One 11, e0162086 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Nordin, A., Strengbom, J., Forsum, Å. & Ericson, L. Complex Biotic Interactions Drive Long-Term Vegetation Change in a Nitrogen Enriched Boreal Forest. Ecosystems 12, 1204–1211 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gundale, M. J., Bach, L. H. & Nordin, A. The impact of simulated chronic nitrogen deposition on the biomass and N2-fixation activity of two boreal feather moss–cyanobacteria associations. Biol. Lett. 9, 20130797 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    From, F., Lundmark, T., Mörling, T., Pommerening, A. & Nordin, A. Effects of simulated long-term N deposition on Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris growth in boreal forest. NRC Res. Press 1403, 1396–1403 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Högberg, M. N., Högberg, P. & Myrold, D. D. Is microbial community composition in boreal forest soils determined by pH, C-to-N ratio, the trees, or all three? Oecologia 150, 590–601 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Joergensen, R. G. & Wichern, F. Quantitative assessment of the fungal contribution to microbial tissue in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 2977–2991 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wallander, H., Ekblad, A. & Bergh, J. Growth and carbon sequestration by ectomycorrhizal fungi in intensively fertilized Norway spruce forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 262, 999–1007 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Martínez, Á. T. et al. Biodegradation of lignocellulosics: Microbial, chemical, and enzymatic aspects of the fungal attack of lignin. Int. Microbiol. 8, 195–204 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Berg, B. & McClaugherty, C. Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74923-3 2008).

  29. 29.

    Berg, B. et al. Maximum decomposition limits of forest litter types: a synthesis. Can. J. Bot. 74, 659–672 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hobbie, S. E. et al. Response of decomposing litter and its microbial community to multiple forms of nitrogen enrichment. Ecol. Monogr. 82, 389–405 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hobbie, S. E. Plant species effects on nutrient cycling: revisiting litter feedbacks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 357–363 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ahti, T., Hämet-ahti, L., Jalas, J., Annales, S. & Fennici, B. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe their. Finnish Zool. Bot. Publ. Board 5, 169–211 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ishida, T. A. & Nordin, A. No evidence that nitrogen enrichment affect fungal communities of Vaccinium roots in two contrasting boreal forest types. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 234–243 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Pihl-Karlsson, G., Akselsson, C., Hellsten, S., Karlsson, P. & Malm, G. Övervakning av luftföroreningar i norra Sverige - mätningar och modellering (2009).

  35. 35.

    Strengbom, J., Nordin, A., Näsholm, T. & Ericson, L. Parasitic fungus mediates change in nitrogen-exposed boreal forest vegetation. J. Ecol. 90, 61–67 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Veen, G. F., Sundqvist, M. K. & Wardle, D. A. Environmental factors and traits that drive plant litter decomposition do not determine home-field advantage effects. Funct. Ecol. 981–991 (2015).

  37. 37.

    Ayres, E. et al. Home-field advantage accelerates leaf litter decomposition in forests. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 606–610 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 911–917 (1959).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    White, D. C., Nickels, J. S., King, J. D. & Bobbie, R. J. Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractable lipid phosphate. Oecologia 62, 51–62 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Frostegård, Å., Tunlid, A. & Bååth, E. Use and misuse of PLFA measurements in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1–5 (2010).

  41. 41.

    Tremblay, A. & Ransijn, J. A suite of functions to back-fit fixed effects and forward-fit random effects, as well as other miscellaneous functions. Compr. R Arch. Netw (2013).

  42. 42.

    Blanchet, G., Legendre, P. & Borcard, D. Forward selection of spatial explanatory variables. Ecology 89, 2623–2632 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Šmilauer, P. & Lepš, J. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO 5. (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Clydecia Spitzer and Lisbet Bach for assistance with laboratory work, and Nicolas Fanin for statistical advice. The project was supported by the Center for Environmental Research in Umeå (CMF) and Swedish FORMAS and KSLA.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.N., N.I.M., M.J.G., K.P. contributed to the conceptualization, N.I.M. did the formal analysis and Investigation: N.I.M. Funding came from M.J.G., K.P., A.N. Writing of the original draft was done by the N.I.M., M.J.G., K.P. and A.N.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia I. Maaroufi.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maaroufi, N.I., Nordin, A., Palmqvist, K. et al. Nitrogen enrichment impacts on boreal litter decomposition are driven by changes in soil microbiota rather than litter quality. Sci Rep 7, 4083 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04523-w

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing