Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Geochemical constraints on the Hadean environment from mineral fingerprints of prokaryotes

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 14 March 2018

This article has been updated


The environmental conditions on the Earth before 4 billion years ago are highly uncertain, largely because of the lack of a substantial rock record from this period. During this time interval, known as the Hadean, the young planet transformed from an uninhabited world to the one capable of supporting, and inhabited by the first living cells. These cells formed in a fluid environment they could not at first control, with homeostatic mechanisms developing only later. It is therefore possible that present-day organisms retain some record of the primordial fluid in which the first cells formed. Here we present new data on the elemental compositions and mineral fingerprints of both Bacteria and Archaea, using these data to constrain the environment in which life formed. The cradle solution that produced this elemental signature was saturated in barite, sphene, chalcedony, apatite, and clay minerals. The presence of these minerals, as well as other chemical features, suggests that the cradle environment of life may have been a weathering fluid interacting with dry-land silicate rocks. The specific mineral assemblage provides evidence for a moderate Hadean climate with dry and wet seasons and a lower atmospheric abundance of CO2 than is present today.


The geologic record of Earth’s first 500 Myr is confined mainly to Hadean detrital zircons1,2. Newly discovered graphite inclusions in some of these zircons extend evidence for the emergence of life to 4.1 Ga3. Deep-root models indicate that at ~4.2 Ga Eubacteria and Archaebacteria diverged from the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), which existed in Hadean between ~4.4-4.2 Ga4,5. In addition, recent findings6 suggest that prokaryotic metabolism likely remained unchanged for billions of years. Hence, the common chemical features imprinted in the metabolic processes of both prokaryotic kingdoms may be inherited from LUCA. This imprint is not limited to organic molecules, such as amino acids, simple sugars, lipids and nucleic acids, but may also include inorganic constituents, i.e. anions, metal ions and neutrally charged solution complexes. These inorganic species likely impacted early biological evolution, and left a signature in the first cellular metabolism7. As later organisms evolved and diversified, it is possible they preserved the essential elements of their formation environment in their cytosols7,8,9,10,11,12,13. This concept, known as “chemistry conservation principle”11,14, states that the chemical traits of living cells are more conserved than the changing ambient conditions on Earth. Therefore, chemical similarities among prokaryotes that survived the hypothetical late heavy bombardment at ~3.9 Ga9 could provide unique information about the primordial terrestrial environment and complement data from Hadean zircons.

Here we provide a detailed analysis of the inorganic constituents of metabolically and phylogenetically diverse prokaryotes subjected to different culture conditions to unveil mineral fingerprints in their composition and show new evidence for how Hadean Earth conditions may have impacted the origin of life. In the context of rare reports on the elemental composition of mesophilic bacteria (Supplementary Table 1), we analyzed the chemical composition of five species of bacteria (Acetobacter aceti, Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris, Escherichia coli, Nesterenkonia lacusekhoensis, and Vibrio cholerae) and two species of halophilic Archaea (Haloferax volcanii, and Natrialba magadii) (Supplementary Table 2) whose growth requirements vary greatly; i.e. their cultivation temperatures fluctuated between 32 °C and 45 °C, the ambient pH ranged from 3.5 to 10, and the growing media were characterized by distinct chemical compositions (Supplementary Table 3). To determine the impact of culture media composition and cultivation conditions on our results, E. coli was grown in the media of H. volcanii (E. coli in HVCM), N. lacusekhoensis (E. coli in TSB) and at highly alkaline pH, which is appropriate for the cultivation of N. magadii (E. coli at pH = 10). Moreover, E. coli was cultivated in a medium prepared with aqueous solution produced from interactions with basalt (E. coli in BS).

Results and Discussion

The studied microorganisms show chemical similarities in their inorganic components, possibly inherited from LUCA and its surrounding environment (Fig. 1a). An alternative explanation for this similarity is that the cells incorporated their trace element patterns from growth media with similar trace element signatures. To avoid this possibility, the sets of corresponding pairs of observations on element contents in grown cells and nutrient media were compared using the statistical tests for two related samples (Supplementary Discussion). The implemented tests, as well as direct comparison with compositions of growth media (Supplementary Table 3), provide evidence that prokaryotes tend to control the content of most measured trace elements. In order to accelerate the cultivation of living cells, the standard laboratory cultivation media used in our experiments share similarities with prokaryotes with respect to their main cations, such as Mg2+, K+ and Ca2+. The variation in the elemental composition measured for E. coli cultivated at different conditions is comparable with fluctuations among all tested prokaryotes (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Discussion). In fact, growth medium composition, temperature, pH, redox conditions, and the life stage of cells play a role in the chemical makeup of microorganisms15,16. Experiments16 with A. violaceus cultivated in media with differing Mn content, one of the most flexible constituents in living cells, revealed that this element could be accumulated by those bacteria at wide interval (4·10−5 - 0.2 mol kg−1 of wet weight), which is correlated with medium concentration. However, the consistent growth of A. violaceus can continue only at the favorable interval of 4·10−5 - 4·10−4 mol kg−1 of wet weight16. All prokaryotes considered here were cultivated in media without enforcing their elemental supply and, hence, observed compositions reveal those favorable intervals. The commonality of the chemical composition of prokaryotes we report here was recently confirmed for species living at extreme hydrothermal conditions17, demonstrating that the major trends of prokaryotic inorganic composition are insensitive to environmental settings. Our measurements also agree with the limited measurements available in the literature (Supplementary Table 1). We propose that a few outliers in literature reports shown in Fig. 1a and in Supplementary Table 1 for Li, Ti, Zr, Sn, Ba, Th and U stem from experiments with an excess of those elements in the nutrient media, or due to deprecated analytical techniques. Nevertheless, the bulk mineralization, pH and pe of prokaryotic cytoplasm can vary with environmental parameters18, so that any elemental signature of the cradle environment is best discerned not from the absolute concentrations of elements or solution species, but in ratios of their chemical activities (Fig. 1b). These ratios can be interpreted using approaches traditionally employed in analyzing fluid geochemistry. These methods screen against effects caused by distinct ionic strength and type of speciation in living cells. Changes in the bulk elemental content may differ by factors of 100–1000 while retaining the same activity value of the essential solution species. The chemical composition of any natural fluid is established as a balance between dissolution of primary minerals and precipitation of alteration phases. The precipitating minerals are often in equilibrium with the solution components. To reveal those minerals, we calculated the saturation indices for the extended set of solid phases using both measured cytosolic compositions and literature reports considering Si, Al, Ti, Ba and other key solution components in certain prokaryotic species (Supplementary Table 1). All calculations were performed independently for each species. We found that the fluids corresponding to the composition of each prokaryote are saturated in barite (BaSO4), sphene (titanite, CaTiSiO5), and chalcedony or amorphous silica (SiO2) (Fig. 2a). The saturation index of sphene is pH-sensitive (see Methods). Thus, the saturation indices calculated for species cultivated at strongly acidic or alkaline conditions (A. aceti, A. acidoterrestris, E. coli at pH = 10, E. coli in BS, N. magadii, and V. cholerae) deviate from equilibrium. This mineral association can precipitate from fluids at wide T-P conditions in various rock-dominated environments with low water-rock ratio. Ti-bearing mineral (sphene) is particularly relevant for determining formation conditions because Ti is often considered as an immobile element and does not migrate for long distances19. We found those minerals in the weathering profile of Paraná basalts (22.892764°S, 47.089161°W, Fig. 2b). Recently, the same mineral association was reported for the oldest known basalt paleosols (2.76 Ga) observed in Mount Roe20. However, weathering specifics in the Hadean is yet unclear and its geochemical features might be distinct even in Neoarchean regoliths.

Figure 1

Composition of prokaryotes and dispersion of elemental abundances. (a) Observed prokaryotic compositions versus literature data. Uncertainties (1σ) comprise reported values for literature data and variations in our repeated measurements. (b) Interquartile ratios calculated for measured elemental contents in prokaryotes (n = 11, see Methods). Biologically essential chemical elements (Supplementary Discussion) are marked by green color. Also the plot illustrates the dispersion of solution species (dark green) supporting the mineral fingerprints considered in this research.

Figure 2

Mineral fingerprints in prokaryotes and minerals precipitated in altered basalts. (a) Mineral saturation indices calculated for observed and literature compositions48 of various prokaryotes at conditions of their cultivation. For a few species, barite saturation indices (unfilled circles) were estimated using the median valuve of sulfur measured in other species. The shaded region approximates the equilibrium range. Uncertainties are 2σ. (b) An analogue for the cradle environment in the modern weathering regolith of Paraná basalts. Mineral abbreviations: Ap – apatite, Brt – barite, Chal – chalcedony, Fe-smc – Fe-smectite, Sph – sphene.

Mineral fingerprints are encoded in cellular metabolisms as the needs for certain solution species (i.e. Ba2+, Ca2+, SO42−, SiO2,aq, Ti(OH)4,aq). Ca2+ and SO42− are the main cytosolic constituents involved in numerous biochemical processes21 (see Supplementary Discussion). Barite crystals can be used as a gravitational sensor21 and to control the cell density22. Therefore, to maintain its saturation level the product of Ba2+ and SO42− contents needs to be constant. SiO2,aq or Si(OH)4,aq play a role in glycoprotein stabilization21. In addition, silica encapsulation is used by bacteria to aid survival under extreme pH conditions23. Titanium is a potential reducing agent responsible for the protection of cells from excessive oxidation. It can also participate in photosynthesis and in the fixation of molecular nitrogen24. At the stage of prebiotic evolution, SiO2,aq and Ti(OH)4,aq might catalyze the nucleobase and acyclo nucleoside synthesis11,25,26,27,28. Under acidic and alkaline conditions (pH < 4 and > 8) the total content of Si and Ti in cytoplasm can be significantly higher than the concentrations of essential solution species involved in metabolic reactions (Fig. 3). This forces the cells to accumulate barren solution species, providing additional energetic consumption and shifts in their chemical makeup.

Figure 3

Si and Ti speciation in fluids saturated with respect to various minerals versus contents in prokaryotes. (a) The ΣSi and SiO2,aq in solutions saturated with amorphous silica and chalcedony. NaHSiO3,aq and HSiO3 trends correspond to saturation in amorphous silica. (b) The bulk Ti content and solution species correspond to saturation level of sphene and rutile at pH = 7 and cation composition of E. coli. They are propagated to other pH values assuming the same content of Ti(OH)4,aq. In the case of rutile, ΣTi and Ti(OH)4,aq are shown only. Uncertainties (2σ) on thermodynamically predicted total Si and Ti are shown by shaded regions. The prokaryotic abundances are marked with squares scaled by their 2σ uncertainty. The unfilled circles reveal the estimated contents of SiO2,aq and Ti(OH)4,aq in cells. At pH < 8 SiO2,aq equals to the bulk Si content.

Assuming the obtained prokaryotic compositions sample the composition of natural fluid in which LUCA survived, mineral stability fields and various chemical features of these fluids can be used to estimate the temperature, pH and pe ranges of the Hadean environment in which life formed. Significant concentrations of redox sensitive trace metals coupled with high iron and sulfur contents impose a lower limit on pe (Fig. 4a). At values of the reduction potential corresponding to the sulfide-sulfate buffer, As, Cd, Cu, Mo, Pb, Se, V, and Zn cannot be retained in solution and deposit as sulfides, selenides minerals or are captured as impurities by Fe-smectites and pyrite. Because the rare earth elements (REE) patterns do not reveal the well-defined Ce anomaly for all studied prokaryotes (Supplementary Table 2), the upper redox boundary is constrained by precipitation of cerianite (CeO2), approximating the ferrous-ferric iron buffer. The precipitation of titanite strongly limits the pCO2 in the water-rock system29; hence, carbon would have existed in reduced form, i.e. CO, CH4 and/or hydrocarbons. This fluid likely interacted with Hadean igneous rocks, whose redox conditions were controlled by the fayalite-magnetite-quartz buffer2. Given that the fluid contained reduced C species, igneous magnetite containing ferric iron was probably the main oxidant. To prevent the resulting solution from reduction, the masses of dissolved Fe3+ and reduced carbon should be comparable. In order to accomplish this, the water-rock ratio had to be < 1 and the reduction potential variable with time, constrained with stability fields of sulfides and Fe2+/Fe3+ buffer. A variable reduction potential is easily reached with alternating wet and dry periods: during wet periods the fluids become more reduced promoting the precipitation of sulfides and during droughts the solution becomes oxidized and could remobilize them. The stability fields of Mn minerals and zincite (ZnO) restricts the activity of H+ in solution to acidic and neutral values.

Figure 4

Constraints on the Hadean environment. (a) A pe-pH diagram illustrating the redox buffers and stability fields of minerals calculated for E. coli composition at 15 °C and 1 bar. The shaded region outlines the conditions where the measured solution is stable. (b) Determination of equilibrium temperature (Teq) for E. coli composition at pH-pe conditions marked by green star on the Fig. 4a. The grey area represents 2σ uncertainty for equilibrium. (c) The upper limit for pCO2 in the cradle environment constrained by the precipitation of sphene. Calculations are based on temperatures and pH estimated using the mineral equilibria approach. CO2 pressure calculated using compositions of archaea - dark green, E. coli – dark yellow, other bacteria - light green, and literature data (Supplementary Table 1) - dark cyan. Uncertainties are 1σ. Mineral abbreviations: Anl – analcime, Ap – Cl-apatite, Brt – barite, Bth – berthierine, Cer – cerianite, Chal – chalcedony, Clc – clinochlore, Fe-smc – Fe smectite, Hsm – hausmannite, Ilm – ilmenite, Lmt – laumontite, Micr – microcline, Mnt-Ca and Mnt-Mg – Ca- and Mg-montmorillonites, Py – pyrite, Pcr – pyrochroite, Qtz – quartz, Rt – rutile, SiO2* – amorphous silica, Sp – sphalerite, Sph – sphene, Znc – zincite.

Because barite is thermodynamically stable in contact with organic molecules, the upper temperature limit can be established at ~100–140 °C, where thermochemical sulfate reduction by hydrocarbons starts30. This upper limit is compatible with the most thermophilic contemporary terrestrial microorganisms, which can grow at temperatures up to 122 °C31. A more stringent constraint on temperature can be obtained with the use of empirical geothermometers (see Methods). The Li geothermometer32 provides T = 13 ± 6 °C. We can also estimate the temperature and pH of the cradle environment using a mineral equilibrium approach33. For the mineral concentrations measured, equilibrium is achieved at 14 ± 9 °C at weakly acidic pH = 6.3 ± 0.3, in good agreement with the Li geothermometer (Fig. 4b,c). The low ambient temperatures suggested by this analysis support the concept of a mesophilic LUCA, as do analyses of ribosomal RNAs and protein sequences8. At these parameters, the measured prokaryotic compositions are also in equilibrium with apatite (Ca5(OH,Cl)(PO4)3), montmorillonite ((Ca,Mg)0.3Mg0.6Al1.4Si4O10(OH)2) and berthierine (Fe2Al2SiO5(OH)4) – the latter a common Fe-rich clay mineral in rocks exposed to hydrocarbons34, which has been found in the Archean Mount Roe basalt paleosols20. The metabolic functions of chemical elements linked with those minerals are considered in the Supplementary Discussion.

Prokaryotes share a common ratio in the concentration of Cl and Br, with Cl/Br in A. acidoterrestris near 2800 and in E. coli in HVCM around 3500. The only literature data available for Cl and Br content shows a Cl/Br ratio of 3600 in phytoplankton35. These Cl/Br ratios are well above the oceanic ratio (~650) and the bulk Earth value (420). Solutions or mineral deposits with such high Cl/Br ratios can be formed only in contact with halite (NaCl) or evaporated saline waters36.

Cytosolic REE concentrations may further constrain the formation environment of LUCA. All tested prokaryotes concentrate REE by up to a factor of 1000 relative to their concentrations in the cultivation media, with individual variations among elements of this group varying by a factor of 100. The only exception is E. coli in BS, which initially has a well-fitted pattern in its culture medium (Fig. 5a). Selective accumulation and common REE patterns have been observed for various bacterial species both in laboratory and natural environments, and can be used as a biosignature37,38. To accumulate REE, cells use a variety of mechanisms such as surface adsorption, adsorption on extracellular biopolymeric substances and biominerals, and accumulation on carboxylate and phosphate binding sites. However, only a fraction of selectively captured REE can be transported in cytoplasm39. Our data support this concept. The patterns of prokaryotes did not change during washing, whereas some species lost up to 87% of initially adsorbed REE (Fig. 5a). There is no significant difference in REE patterns between the bacteria and archaea examined here. This evidences that prokaryotes retain a pattern derived from LUCA. Considering potential sources of the REE signature, the bulk REE contents are higher than in river and sea waters (Fig. 5b). Although Ce anomalies may be negative or positive (0.7–1.6), in all species there is a well-defined negative Eu anomaly (0.5–0.8) typical for weathered rocks40. LaN/YbN depicts the enrichment of light REE relative to heavy REE with median value 10.7. Those specific patterns resemble the REE distributions in Paraná basalts and especially in Mount Roe paleosols (Table 1). However, the affinity of prokaryotic pattern to the upper continental crust41 is also well expressed. By contrast, the characteristic feature of oceanic hydrothermal fluids is a remarkable positive Eu anomaly42,43. Hence, the signature of those solutions is dissimilar to living cells. It should be noted that REE compositions of both oceanic and continental hydrothermal fluids are very flexible, depending on the composition of interacting rocks.

Figure 5

REE in prokaryotes versus (a) their contents in nutrient media (1-REE ratios for cells before and 2-after washing procedure) and (b) selected rocks and fluids. The C1 normalized plots are shown for Mount Roe basalt paleosol (MR#120), Paraná basalt, upper continental crust41, mean trends for continental and oceanic hydrothermal fluids43, Upper Paraná river water draining the Paraná basalts75 and seawater76. The median (dark cyan) is plotted for archaea (dark green), E. coli (dark yellow) and other bacteria (light green). Uncertainties are 1σ.

Table 1 Affinity of REE patterns in prokaryotes to different rock and fluid signatures. The lower value of the parameter corresponds to closer proximity between patterns (see Methods).

The set of dissolved source rock minerals required to form a fluid similar to prokaryotic cytosolic compositions can be reconstructed from inverse modeling. To produce this solution, all tested species require the dissolution of rock consisting of Ca-montmorillonite (74–89 vol.%), plagioclase (0–17), ilmenite (6–11), K-feldspar (0–4), magnetite (2–3), goethite (1–3), apatite (0.5–3.7), and pyrite (0.06–0.18). Due to this interaction, the following secondary minerals can precipitate: i.e., Mg-montmorillonite (32–50 vol.%), berthierine (28–40), chalcedony (12–15), sphene (9–13), and barite (0–0.01). Those mineral associations are consistent with the composition of weathering regoliths formed on basalts through interaction with rainwater. The dissolution/precipitation kinetics (see Methods) reveals that the solution coexisted with its mineral surroundings for at least tens of years.

The concept of a mineral fingerprint in the chemical composition of prokaryotic cells is based on the constant activities of certain solution species of Mg2+, Al3+, SiO2,aq, HPO42−, SO42−, Ca2+, Ti(OH)4,aq, Fe2+, and Ba2+ (Fig. 1b). Applied statistical tests (Supplementary Discussion) evidenced that the contents of corresponding chemical elements are highly distinct in the growth media and prokaryotic cytoplasm. Also, we demonstrated on the example of SiO2,aq and Ti(OH)4,aq that living cells tend to control the content of those solution species, whereas the total contents of Si and Ti vary in wide ranges depending on the pH value in the growth media (Fig. 3). All those components are abundant in cytoplasm and well-known to be essential for biochemical reactions (Supplementary Discussion and references therein). Other considered geochemical features (Li, Cl/Br, REE pattern) are attributed to minor components whose metabolic functions and behavior may be less understood, but they also support the concept.

The commonalities in the chemical composition of prokaryotes presented here suggest that the final stage of prebiotic evolution that preceded the emergence of LUCA (or its early evolution) took place in a dry-land environment. Hence, cavities in surface rocks may have been the first ecological niches to be occupied by early microorganisms44. Weathered basalts or basaltic komatiites are the first-order candidates to being those host rocks. They were exposed on the Hadean Earth45. However, other rock types bearing clay minerals, minor barite, sphene, silica minerals, apatite and enriched in metals and REE might provide similar fluids. Through modeling and comparison of the results with the chemical and mineralogical makeup of prokaryotes, we suggest that during the Hadean there were climatic conditions with alternating dry and wet periods and moderate ambient temperatures. Atmospheric pCO2 must have been below the present atmospheric level (Fig. 4c), and the cradle fluid was enriched in reduced carbon. The weakly acidic pH suggested by this analysis also implies that the atmosphere was not necessarily CH4-dominated46, but may instead have contained a hydrocarbon haze47 that provided C and N-bearing compounds. Alternatively, the cradle environment could have been at a cooling periphery of a dry-land hydrothermal system11. However, all other elements necessary for life besides C and N could be mobilized from host rocks. (The works described in references44,46,47 approach Archean environments only. There is very little information about the Hadean. Even through the Archean rocks formed during the more recent epoch can provide insights into the Hadean atmosphere and climate, Hadean conditions might differ.)


Cultivation of prokaryotes and samples preparation

Escherichia coli (CCT 5050), Acetobacter aceti (CCT 2565), Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris (CCT 4384) Nesterenkonia lacusekhoensis (CCT 7527) and Vibrio cholerae (CCT 7557) strains were obtained from the culture collection of the André Tosello Institute (Campinas, SP, Brazil). Haloferax volcanii (DS70) and Natrialba magadii (ATCC43099) strains were provided by Dr. X. C. Abrevaya (IAFE – UBA – CONICET, Argentina). All prokaryotes were cultivated in the André Tosello Institute. The major challenge in the observation of chemical composition of bacterial and archaeal cells was to obtain cultures without contaminations from the culture medium or any other substance. Therefore, the washing from the nutrient media was made with ultrapure water17,48.

First, unfrozen strains were placed in activation Stock Culture Agar. Then, E. coli was transferred to Luria Bertani broth (LB)49, A. acidoterrestris – to Bacillus Acidocaldarius Medium (BAM)50, N. lacusekhoensis and V. cholerae – to Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB)51, and A. aceti – to Mannitol medium52. BAM was adjusted to pH = 3.5 at 25 °C, the Mannitol medium – to pH = 5, V. cholerae was cultivated in medium with pH = 9, and other bacteria – with pH = 7. The active culture incubation proceeded in those media during 72 h. E. coli, V. cholerae, A. aceti and N. lacusekhoensis were cultivated at 32 °C with shaking at 130 rpm. A. acidoterrestris was incubated at 45 °C without shaking. Haloarchaeal strains were grown in specialized media53. H. volcanii was grown at 45 °C, aerobically, with shaking at 200 rpm, in Hv-YPC broth54 containing (g l−1): yeast extract (5), peptone (1), casaminoacids (1), NaCl (144), MgSO4.7H2O (21), MgCl.6H2O (18), KCl (4.2), CaCl2 (3 mM), and Tris-HCl (12 mM), with pH adjusted to 7 (at 25 °C). N. magadii was grown at 32 °C, aerobically, with shaking at 200 rpm. The growth medium composition55 was (g l−1): yeast extract (5), NaCl (200), Na2CO3 (18.5), sodium citrate (3), KCl (2), MgSO4.7H2O (1), MnCl2.4H2O (3.6.10−4), FeSO4.7H2O (5.10−3), with pH adjusted to 10 (at 25 °C).

We aimed to investigate species dwelling in diverse environments. Hence, the cultivated prokaryotes required chemically distinct growth media. To investigate the impact of growth medium composition on the composition of cells, E. coli was grown in the media of other species; i.e., in the culture medium of H. volcanii and in the TSB medium of N. lacusekhoensis. In the culture media of A. acidoterrestris and N. magadii the production of E. coli was depressed and we could not collect a cell volume adequate for measurements. However, despite the increased growth time (120 h), we cultivated E. coli in the LB nutrient medium at pH = 10 attributed to growing conditions of N. magadii. E. coli was also cultivated in medium prepared with aqueous solution interacted with Paraná basalt (E. coli in BS). For this, the pure water acidified with nitric acid to pH = 3.5 was mixed with the basaltic powder in proportion 10 to 1 by weight and heated in an autoclave at 110 °C during 10 days. The elevated temperature and low pH provided a faster extraction of cations. This solution was then filtered and used to prepare the LB medium of E.coli. All culture media were sterilized by autoclaving at 120 °C for 20 minutes.

After incubation, cells were separated by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 10 min at 10 °C. In order to avoid contamination from the culture medium, collected live cells were suspended in sterilized ultrapure water and centrifuged again, as above. We found that further washing iterations did not impact the chemistry of collected samples. The washing with ultrapure water provided a risk of lysis of cells. Therefore, after each wash procedure, the viability of the cultures was controlled through the hanging drop technique56. Experimentally, we found that prokaryotes survived in pure water during ~15 minutes. Therefore, all operations were conducted over that time-frame. All samples were analyzed using the gram stain method to ensure no contamination of the culture by other microorganisms57. The optical density of the cultures was measured using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron) at λ = 600 nm, and 10 µl aliquots were taken for direct cell counting under the microscope.

The twice washed and centrifuged cultures gave up to 2 g of live biomass. They were collected into PFA vials (Savillex). Weighed portions of ~0.5 g intended for ICP-QMS analyses were separated. Then, 1 ml of distilled HNO3 was added and the combination heated on a hot plate at 120 °C until almost complete evaporation of the samples. Next, 0.5 ml of distilled HNO3 was added and the heating procedure was repeated. HNO3 (100 μl) and ultra pure water (1 ml) were used to take up the residue. The vessels were heated for 5 minutes to obtain a clear solution. The solutions were gravimetrically diluted with ultrapure water to 10 g. All mass losses and gains attributed to evaporation of volatile constituents and addition of ultrapure water and HNO3 were taken into account. Therefore, all yielded observations can be considered as the wet weight of the live cells. The rest of samples were used for Karl Fischer titration and TXRF (Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence) analyses.

To control for washing losses and gains, all species were sampled 2 or 3 times before washing, after the first and second washings. The culture media before and after the cultivation were also sampled. All samples were run in duplicate. In bulk, 160 samples were analyzed. The revealed uncertainties demonstrate the standard deviation between 4–6 independent observations.

Analytical methods

Measurements of prokaryotic compositions were performed using an ICP-QMS (Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry with quadrupole mass) equipped with collision cell technology (XseriesII, Thermo, Bremen, Germany) in the Isotope Geology Laboratory (IG, Unicamp, Brazil). To provide concentrations in P, S, Cl and Br, TXRF analyses for concentrations of those elements were yielded using the S2 PICOFOX in the Bruker Research Center (Berlin, Germany). The water content in Prokaryotes was observed with Karl Fischer titration in the Institute of Chemistry (Unicamp). Compositions of minerals, elemental maps and BSE images of Paraná basalts were acquired with MEV/EDS Link/Isis Oxford (IG, Unicamp). The bulk chemical composition of basalts was obtained with a Philips PW2404 X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer (IG, Unicamp). Also, the types of silica and clay minerals were determined using the EDS/MEV and XploRA (Horiba) Raman spectroscopy in the Institute of Physics (Unicamp). The specific surface areas of minerals were obtained using the BET method with nitrogen gas and the Micromeritics Accelerated Surface Area and Porosimetry (ASAP) 2020 System (Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Unicamp).

Statistical handling

The obtained compositions of prokaryotes and their growth media were statistically compared using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software. We implemented the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, the Sign test and the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (KS test) (see Supplementary Discussion). The Wilcoxon and Sign tests are used to outline the consistent difference between pairs of observations at the assumption that living cells and nutrient media represent the dependent samples. In contrast, the KS test considers the compositions of growth media and prokaryotes as independent samples and compares their empirical distributions. The rejection of the null hypothesis in all tests provides evidence that the elemental abundances in prokaryotes are distinct from their content in nutrient media. The samples’ size is 11 and p is 0.05. We also compared E. coli compositions with other prokaryotes using the KS test (p = 0.05). The first sample with size of 5 comprised trace element contents in E. coli and the second sample with size of 6 in other bacteria and archaea.

The interquartile ratio (IQR) was used to compare the dispersion of abundances of chemical elements in prokaryotes (n = 11) and is calculated as follows:


where Q1 and Q3 are first and third quartiles, respectively. In its turn, the quartiles were estimated for the whole set of IQRs. The chemical elements characterizing by IQR below the first quartile can be characterized by the most stable content in living cells, whereas the highest IQRs exceeding third quartile depict the most variable elements. Also the extent of dispersion was estimated for solution species (i.e. Mg2+, Al3+, SiO2,aq, HPO42−, SO42−, Ca2+, Ti(OH)4,aq, Fe2+, Ba2+) constraining the saturation level of minerals considered in the present research.

Geochemical calculations

The inverse modeling, speciation calculations and estimation of saturation indices were performed with the software PHREEQC version 358. The uncertainties in equilibrium constants and dissolution/precipitation rates of minerals were calculated using the CRONO software59,60. In the course of geochemical simulations to provide reliable results, we applied different databases of thermodynamic parameters. To calculate data shown in Fig. 2a the llnl.dat61 was used. This dataset is a part of the standard PHREEQC download. We enforced the database (Database S1) with solubility constants for ilmenite, rutile, and titanite from Supcrt slot0762 and with a formation constant for the solution complex Ti(OH)4(HPO4)2− (ref. 63). The Thermoddem (Thermochemical and Mineralogical Tables for Geochemical Modeling) database64 reveals very close values on saturation indices plotted in Fig. 2a. To design Fig 4a,b and for inverse modeling, we used the Thermoddem database because it includes more mineral species than analogical datasets. This tabulation lacks a temperature dependence on solubility constant for chlorapatite. Its values have been calculated using literature data65. Ti(OH)4(HPO4)2− was also added. At the preliminary stage of the research, we utilized the modified pitzer.dat66. However, because at the found range of pe and pCO2 the ionic strength of all simulated solutions was less than 1 M, the extended Debye-Hückel model was used to emulate the activities of aqueous species. The kinetic parameters stem from the tabulation composed by Palandri and Kharaka67. All considered databases lack the constants for high molecular weight organic species, which are assumed to be abundant in both cytoplasm and in the hypothetical Hadean environment. To outline the possible impact of organics to the speciation model, we implemented a series of additional calculations with different portions of fulvate2− and discussed this issue in details in the Supplementary Discussion.

The deposition of sphene (titanite) from aqueous solution was described with the reaction:


Its saturation index (SI) is calculating as:


where Keq is the equilibrium constant and aCa2+, aSiO2,aq, aTi(OH)4,aq are activities of solution species (mol kgw−1 – molal units, kgw means 1 kg of water).

The plots shown in Fig. 3 were calculated in the Microsoft Excel spreadsheets (Database S2) using equilibrium constants at T = 32 °C for Si solution species from Supcrt slot0762 and for Ti species from refs 63 and 68. To calculate the concentration of NaHSiO3,aq, the content of Na observed in N. magadii was used. The concentrations of Ti species were estimated with values for aCa2+, aSiO2,aq, aTi(OH)4,aq, aHPO4–2 taken the same as predicted for E. coli.

The saturation of prokaryotes with respect to sphene (titanite) is an important finding. Unlike rutile, titanite precipitates at low content of HCO3 in fluids. Therefore, its presence can be used as an indicator of CO2 content in the atmosphere20,29. The upper limit for pCO2 coexisting with titanite in subaerial sediments can be established with the following equation:


where Keq represents an equilibrium constant for reaction 2CaTiSiO5(sphene) + 2H+ + CO2,g = Ca2+  + CaCO3(calcite) + 2TiO2(rutile) + SiO2,aq + SiO2(quartz) + H2O, and aCa2+, aSiO2,aq, aH+ are activities of solution species (mol kgw−1).

Empirical geothermometers are often used to determine the in situ temperature of natural fluids. However, most geothermometers are based on certain contents of Na, Mg, K, Ca69. These are important nutrients and their abundance in prokaryotes might be likely considerably modified in the course of biological evolution. According to our observations, the silica (chalcedony) geothermometer70 reflects the temperature of cultivation of cells. However, whereas their predictions are rather uncertain, Ca/Na, Mg/Li and Na/Li geothermometers32,70,71 suggest low ambient temperatures for the cradle environment. The Li geothermometer32 uses the following expression:

$$T^\circ {\rm{K}}=2258/(1.44\,\mbox{--}\,\mathrm{log}\,{{\rm{m}}}_{{\rm{Li}}})$$

where mLi is a molal concentration (mol kgw−1) of Li in the solution. For A. aceti, E. coli, E. coli at pH = 10, E. coli in HVCM, E. coli in TSB, H. volcanii, N. lacusekhoensis, and V. cholerae, the temperature of 13(σ = 6)°C is predicted, for A. acidoterrestris, – T = 0 °C, for E. coli in BS, – T = 38 °C and for N. magadii, – T = 73 °C. Probably the supply on Li in the cells can be modified at extreme pH conditions.

Also the temperature and pH in the cradle environment were reconstructed applying the mineral equilibria approach33,72. The technique relies on the use of the composition of a natural fluid to constrain a temperature and pH where a set of alteration minerals are computed to be in equilibrium with the aqueous phase. For all studied prokaryotic species, a series of calculation was yielded at the temperature range of 0.1–150 °C and pH varying between 5 and 9. The redox potential was fixed at the sphalerite saturation level. Pressure was equal to 1 bar at T < 100 °C and corresponds to the saturated steam pressure at T ≥ 100 °C. All minerals tabulated in the Thermoddem database were available for the calculations. The equilibrium temperature was computed as a median of saturation temperatures for the following phases: berthierine, ilmenite, Ca- and Mg-montmorillonite (Database S3). At the same temperature range, compositions of some species also revealed equilibrium with chlorapatite (Ca5(PO4)3Cl), chlorite (Mg5Al2Si3O10(OH)8) and goethite (FeOOH). When chlorapatite did not fit the equilibrium, the studied fluids were undersaturated with this mineral and supersaturated with hydroxyapatite (Ca5(PO4)3OH). Hence, a solid solution of chlorapatite and hydroxyapatite, like verified in the Paraná basalts and other rocks (Ca5(OH,Cl)(PO4)3), could provide those solution compositions. The composition of N. magadii does not provide any equilibrium temperature at the tested range.

In the course of inverse modeling (Database S4), we used the compositions of primary minerals observed in Paraná basalts73. Apatite, barite, berthierine, halite, gibbsite, goethite, kaolinite, Ca- and Mg-montmorillonites, pyrite, and sphene were also available in the modeling system. The calculations were yielded at the previously found T-pH-pe conditions. The uncertainties in solution components were equal to 0.2 that in most cases correspond to 2σ uncertainties specified in the Supplementary Table 2.

The formation time for this solution (Δti) can be calculated as follows:

$${{\rm{\Delta }}{\rm{t}}}_{{\rm{i}}}={{\rm{\Delta }}{\rm{x}}}_{{\rm{i}}}/({{\rm{S}}}_{{\rm{i}}}{{\rm{r}}}_{{\rm{i}}})$$

where Δxi represents a dissolved or precipitated amount of mineral species (mol), Si is a surface area of mineral exposed to solution (m2) and ri is a dissolution/precipitation rate (mol m−2 sec−1) calculated at given T, P, pH and pCO2 (Database S5). The BET surface areas of apatite, chalcedony, goethite, ilmenite, magnetite, and pyrite correspond to 1 m2 g−1; K-feldspar, plagioclase and sphene – to 12 m2 g−1; berthierine and barite – to 30 m2 g−1; montmorillonites – to 100 m2 g−1.

Ce anomalies (Ce/Ce*) were calculated here using the expression:

$${\rm{Ce}}/{{\rm{Ce}}}^{\ast }=2{{\rm{Ce}}}_{{\rm{N}}}/({{\rm{La}}}_{{\rm{N}}}+{{\rm{\Pr }}}_{{\rm{N}}})$$

where N represents normalization to C1 chondrite. Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu*) were calculated as:

$${\rm{Eu}}/{{\rm{Eu}}}^{\ast }=2{{\rm{Eu}}}_{{\rm{N}}}/({{\rm{Sm}}}_{{\rm{N}}}+{{\rm{Gd}}}_{{\rm{N}}})$$

The compositions of C1 chondrite and primitive mantle used here were taken from the tabulation of McDonough & Sun74.

The affinity parameter was calculated as a normalized vector distance between all observed prokaryotic REE patterns and a given solution or rock pattern (Database S6). The logarithms of REE contents (CLa, … CLu, ppm) were considered as coordinates of vector z{log CLa, …log CLu}. They were approximated by a linear trend (yi = a xi + b), which is subtracted from the vector z{log CLa – a xLa – b, …log CLu – a xLu – b}, where xLa = 1,… xLu = 14. Based on the yielded normalized vectors z 1 and z 2 , the vector distance (Affinity) was calculated as:

$${\rm{Affinity}}=\Vert {{\bf{z}}}_{{\bf{1}}}\,\mbox{--}\,{{\bf{z}}}_{{\bf{2}}}\Vert +\sqrt{{{\sum }_{i}({z}_{1i}-{z}_{2i})}^{2}}$$

where zi = log Ci – a xi – b and i = La…Lu.

Data Availability

External Databases cited in the paper are loaded in the and marked with DOI number doi:10.1038/protex.2016.007.

Change history

  • 14 March 2018

    A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.


  1. 1.

    Wilde, S. A., Valley, J. W., Peck, W. H. & Graham, C. M. Evidence from detrital zircons for the existence of continental crust and oceans on the Earth 4.4 Gyr ago. Nature 409, 176–178 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Trail, D., Watson, E. B. & Tailby, N. D. The oxidation state of Hadean magmas and implications for early Earth’s atmosphere. Nature 480, 79–82 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bell, E. A., Boehnke, P., Harrison, T. M. & Mao, W. L. Potentially biogenic carbon preserved in a 4.1 billion-year-old zircon. PNAS 112(47), 14518–14521 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hedges, S. B. Life. In: S. B. Hedges and S. Kumar (eds.) The Timetree of Life. Oxford University Press, 89–98 (2009).

  5. 5.

    Battistuzzi, F. U., Feijao, A. & Hedges, S. B. A genomic timescale of prokaryote evolution: insights into the origin of methanogenesis, phototrophy, and the colonization of land. BMC Evolutionary Biology 4(44), doi:10.1186/1471-2148-4-44 (2004).

  6. 6.

    Schopf, J. W. et al. Sulfur-cycling fossil bacteria from the 1.8-Ga Duck Creek Formation provide promising evidence of evolution’s null hypothesis. PNAS 112(7), 2087–2092 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Trevors, J. T. The composition and organization of cytoplasm in prebiotic cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12, 1650–1659 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Boussau, B., Blanquart, S., Necsulea, A., Lartillot, N. & Gouy, M. Parallel adaptations to high temperatures in the Archaean eon. Nature 456, 942–946 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Abramov, O. & Mojzsis, S. J. Microbial habitability of the Hadean Earth during the late heavy bombardment. Nature 459, 419–422 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chopra, A., Lineweaver, C. H., Brocks, J. J. & Ireland, T. R. Palaeoecophylostoichiometrics: searching for the elemental composition of the Last Universal Common Ancestor. In Australian Space Science Conference 2009, edited by W. Short and I. Cairns, National Space Society of Australia, Sydney, 91–104 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Mulkidjanian, A. Y. et al. Origin of first cells at terrestrial, anoxic geothermal fields. PNAS 109(14), E821–E830 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Galimov, E. M., Natochin, Y. V., Ryzhenko, B. N. & Cherkasova, E. V. Chemical composition of the primary aqueous phase of the Earth and origin of life. Geochemistry International 50(13), 1048–1068 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Novoselov, A. A. et al. From cytoplasm to environment: the inorganic ingredients for the origin of Life. Astrobiology 13(3), 294–302 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Macallum, A. B. The paleochemistry of the body fluids and tissues. Physiol. Rev. 6, 316–357 (1926).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Oren, A. Halophilic Microorganisms and Their Environments, Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ., (2002).

  16. 16.

    Letunova, S. V., Ulubekova, M. V. & Shcherbakov, V. I. Manganese concentration by microorganisms inhabiting soils of the manganese biogeochemical province of the Georgian SSR. Microbiology 47, 273–278 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Neveu, M., Poret-Peterson, A. T., Anbar, A. D. & Elser, J. J. Ordinary stoichiometry of extraordinary microorganisms. Geobiology. doi:10.1111/gbi.12153 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Madigan, M. T., Martinko, J. M., Stahl, D. A. & Clark, D. P. Brock Biology of Microorganisms, 14th edition, Pearson Benjamin-Cummings, San Francisco (2015).

  19. 19.

    Driese, S. G. et al. Neoarchean paleoweathering of tonalite and metabasalt: Implications for reconstructions of 2.69 Ga early terrestrial ecosystems and paleoatmospheric chemistry. Precambrian Research 189, 1–17 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Teitler, Y. et al. Ubiquitous occurrence of basaltic-derived paleosols in the Late Archean Fortescue Group, Western Australia. Precambrian Research 267, 1–27 (2015).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Frausto da Silva, J. J. R. & Williams, R. J. P. The biological chemistry of the elements: The Inorganic Chemistry of Life. 2nd edition, Claredon Press, Oxford, (2001).

  22. 22.

    Couradeau, E. et al. An early-branching microbialite cyanobacterium forms intracellular carbonates. Science 336, 459–462 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hirota, R., Hata, Y., Ikeda, T., Ishida, T. & Kuroda, A. The silicon layer supports acid resistance of Bacillus cereus spores. Journal of Bacteriology 192(1), 111–116 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Shkolnik, M. Y. Trace elements in plants. Elsevier, New York, (1984).

  25. 25.

    Saladino, R. et al. Synthesis and degradation of nucleobases and nucleic acids by formamide in the presence of montmorillonites. ChemBioChem 5, 1558–1566 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Saladino, R. et al. A One-pot TiO2-catalyzed synthesis of nucleic bases and acyclonucleosides from formamide: implications for the origin of life. ChemBioChem 4, 514–521 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Senanayake, S. D. & Idriss, H. Photocatalysis and the origin of life: Synthesis of nucleoside bases from formamide on TiO2(001) single surfaces. PNAS 103(5), 1194–1198 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Saladino, R. et al. Photochemical synthesis of citric acid cycle intermediates based on titanium dioxide. Astrobiology 11, 815–824 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    AlDahan, A. A. & Morad, S. Some remarks on the stability of sphene in diagenetic environments. Chem. Geol. 70, 249–255 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jiang, L., Worden, R. H. & Cai, C. Generation of isotopically and compositionally distinct water during thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) in carbonate reservoirs: Triassic Feixianguan Formation, Sichuan Basin, China. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 165, 249–262 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Takai, K. et al. Cell proliferation at 122 °C and isotopically heavy CH4 production by a hyperthermophilic methanogen under high-pressure cultivation. PNAS 105(31), 10949–10954 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Fouillac, C. & Michard, G. Sodium/lithium ratio in water applied to geothermometry of geothermal reservoirs. Geothermics 10(1), 55–70 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Palandri, J. L. & Reed, M. H. Reconstruction of in situ composition of sedimentary formation waters. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65(11), 1741–1767 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mu, N. et al. Berthierine formation in reservoir rocks from the Siri oilfield (Danish North Sea) as result of fluid-rock interactions: Part I. Characterization. Marine and Petroleum Geology 65, 302–316 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Millero, F. J. Chemical Oceanography, Fourth Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., 591 pp. (2013).

  36. 36.

    Cartwright, I. et al. Hydrogeochemical and isotopic constraints on the origins of dryland salinity, Murray Basin, Victoria, Australia. Applied Geochemistry 19, 1233–1254 (2004).

  37. 37.

    Takahashi, Y., Châtellier, X., Hattori, K. H., Kato, K. & Fortin, D. Adsorption of rare earth elements onto bacteria cell walls and its implication for REE sorption onto natural microbial mats. Chem Geol 219, 53–67 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Takahashi, Y., Hirata, T., Shimizu, H., Ozaki, T. & Fortin, D. A rare earth element signature of bacteria in natural waters? Chem Geol 244, 569–583 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Moriwaki, H. & Yamamoto, H. Interactions of microorganisms with rare earth ions and their utilization for separation and environmental technology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97, 1–8 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gao, S. & Wedepohl, K. H. The negative Eu anomaly in Archean sedimentary rocks: Implications for decomposition, age and importance of their granitic sources. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 133, 81–94 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rudnick, R. L. & Gao, S. 3.01. Composition of the continental crust. In Treatise on Geochemistry; Holland, H. D., Turekian, K. K., Eds., Pergamon, Oxford, 1–56 (2003).

  42. 42.

    Bau, M. & Dulski, P. Comparing yttrium and rare earths in hydrothermal fluids from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: implications for Y and REE behavior during near-vent mixing and for the Y/Ho ratio of Proterozoic seawater. Chemical Geology 155, 77–90 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Karpov, G. A., Nikolaeva, A. G. & Alekhin, Y. V. Abundances and sources of rare-earth elements in the modern volcanogenic hydrothermal systems of Kamchatka. Petrology 21(2), 145–157 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Homann, M. et al. Evidence for cavity-dwelling microbial life in 3.22 Ga tidal deposits. Geology. doi:10.1130/G37272.1 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tessalina, S., Bourdon, B., Van Kranendonk, M. J. & Philippot, P. Influence of Hadean crust evident in basalts and cherts from the Pilbara Craton. Nature Geosciences 3, 214–217 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Alfimova, N. A., Novoselov, A. A., Matrenichev, V. A. & Souza Filho, C. R. Conditions of subaerial weathering of basalts in the Neoarchean and Paleoproterozoic. Precambrian Research 241, 1–16 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Zerkle, A.L., Claire, M.W., Domagal-Goldman, S.D., Farquhar, J. & Poulton, S.W. A bistable organic-rich atmosphere on the Neoarchaean Earth. Nature Geoscience 5, doi:10.1038/NGEO1425 (2012).

  48. 48.

    Rouf, M. A. Spectrochemical analysis of inorganic elements in Bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology 88(6), 1545–1549 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Bertani, G. Studies on Lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology 62(3), 293–300 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Wisse, C. A. & Parish, M. E. Isolation and enumeration of spore forming thermoacidophilic, rod-shaped bacteria from citrus processing environments. Dairy Food and Environmental Sanitation 18, 504–509 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Collins, M. D. et al. Nesterenkonia lacusekhoensis sp. nov., isolated from hypersaline Ekho Lake, East Antarctica, and emended description of the genus Nesterenkonia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr 52, 1145–1150 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Dupuy, P. Recherche d’une technique d’isolement des Acetobacter du vin. Ann Technol Agric 1, 107–112 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Abrevaya, X. C. et al. Comparative survival analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans and the Haloarchaea Natrialba magadii and Haloferax volcanii exposed to vacuum ultraviolet irradiation. Astrobiology 11, 1030–1040 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kauri, T., Wallace, R. & Kushner, D. J. Nutrition of the halophilic archaebacterium, Haloferax volcanii. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 13, 14–18 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Tindall, B. J., Mills, A. A. & Grant, W. D. Natronobacterium gen nov. and Natronococcus gen. nov. two genera of haloalkaliphilic archaebacteria. System Appl. Microbiol. 5, 41–57 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Harmon, S. M., Kautter, D. A., Golden, D. A. & Rhodehamel, E. J. Bacteriological analytical manual, 8th ed. AOAC International, Arlington, VA. (1995).

  57. 57.

    Bartholomew, J. W. & Mittwer, T. The gram stain. Bacteriol. Rev. 16(1), 1–29 (1952).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Parkhurst, D. L. & Appelo, C. A. J. Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3 – A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one- dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A43, 497 (2013).

  59. 59.

    Novoselov, A. A. & Souza Filho, C. R. CRONO – a code for simulation of chemical weathering. Computers & Geosciences 60, 168–175 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Novoselov, A. A., Popov, S. & de Souza Filho, C. R. Evaluation of uncertainties in solid-aqueous-gas chemical equilibrium calculations. Computers & Geosciences 79, 118–128 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Anderson, G. M. Thermodynamics of Natural Systems. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 657 (2005).

  62. 62.

    Johnson, J. W., Oelkers, E. H. & Helgeson, H. C. SUPCRT92: A software package for calculating the standard molal thermodynamic properties of minerals, gases, aqueous species, and reactions from 1 to 5000 bars and 0° to 1000 °C. Computers & Geosciences 18, 899–947 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ziemniak, S. E., Jones, M. E. & Combs, K. E. S. Solubility behavior of titanium(IV) oxide in alkaline media at elevated temperatures. J. Solution Chem. 22(7), 601–623 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Blanc, P. et al. Thermoddem: A geochemical database focused on low temperature water/rock interactions and waste materials. Applied Geochemistry 27(10), 2107–2116 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Tacker, R. C. & Stormer, J. C. A thermodynamic model for apatite solid solutions, applicable to high-temperature geologic problems. American Mineralogist 74, 877–888 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Appelo, C. A. J. Principles, caveats and improvements in databases for calculating hydrogeochemical reactions in saline waters from 0 to 200 °C and 1 to 1000 atm. Applied Geochemistry 55, 62–71 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Palandri, J. L. & Kharaka, Y. K. A compilation of rate parameters of water-mineral interaction kinetics for application to geochemical modeling. Open-File Rep. 2004-1068, U.S. Geol. Surv., Menlo Park, California, 70 (2004).

  68. 68.

    Buettner, K. M. & Valentine, A. M. Bioinorganic chemistry of titanium. Chem. Rev. 112, 1863–1881 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Arnórsson, S. Chemical equilibria in Icelandic geothermal systems – implications for chemical geothermometry investigations. Geothermics 12(2/3), 119–128 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Kharaka, Y. K. & Mariner, R. H. Chemical geothermometers and their application to formation waters from sedimentary basins. In Thermal History of Sedimentary Basins. Springer: 99–117 (1989).

  71. 71.

    Sanjuan, B., Millot, R., Ásmundsson, R., Brach, M. & Giroud, N. Use of two new Na/Li geothermometric relationships for geothermal fluids in volcanic environments. Chem. Geol. 389, 60–81 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Reed, M. & Spycher, N. Calculation of pH and mineral equilibria in hydrothermal waters with application to geothermometry and studies of boiling and dilution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 1479–1492 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Novoselov, A. A. & Souza Filho, C. R. Potassium metasomatism of Precambrian paleosols. Precambrian Research 262, 67–83 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    McDonough, W. F. & Sun, S.-s The composition of the Earth. Chem. Geol. 120, 223–253 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Campodonico, V. A., Garía, M. G. & Pasquini, A. I. The dissolved chemical and isotopic signature downflow the confluence of two large rivers: The case of the Parana and Paraguay rivers. Journal of Hydrology 528, 161–176 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Bau, M., Koschinsky, A., Dulski, P. & Hein, J. R. Comparison of the partitioning behaviours of yttrium, rare earth elements, and titanium between hydrogenetic marine ferromanganese crusts and seawater. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60(10), 1709–1725 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Prof. Serguei Popov (IMECC, Unicamp) for consultations on statistical handling of experimental data and Dr. David L. Parkhurst (U.S. Geological Survey) for help with PHREEQC software. A.A.N. received support from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) grant no. 2011/12682-3 and the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) grant no. 164939/2014-8. C.R.S.F. acknowledges CNPq for research grant no. 2008-7/303563.

Author information




A.A.N. and C.R.S.F. (project supervisor) conceived the investigation. A.A.N. executed the geochemical calculations. X.C.A. shared cultures of haloarchaea. J.S. and M.J.C. cultivated prokaryotes. M.S.N. observed their compositions. The research has been yielded in the laboratory of C.R.S.F. A.A.N., D.S., J.S., X.C.A., M.S.C., P.S., M.S.N. and C.R.S.F. contributed to the manuscript preparation and revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexey A. Novoselov.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A correction to this article is available online at

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novoselov, A.A., Silva, D., Schneider, J. et al. Geochemical constraints on the Hadean environment from mineral fingerprints of prokaryotes. Sci Rep 7, 4008 (2017).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing