Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by an aggressive biological behavior in the absence of a specific target agent. Nicotinamide has recently been proven to be a novel therapeutic agent for skin tumors in an ONTRAC trial. We performed combinatory transcriptomic and in-depth proteomic analyses to characterize the network of molecular interactions in TNBC cells treated with nicotinamide. The multi-omic profiles revealed that nicotinamide drives significant functional alterations related to major cellular pathways, including the cell cycle, DNA replication, apoptosis and DNA damage repair. We further elaborated the global interaction networks of molecular events via nicotinamide-inducible expression changes at the mRNA and functional protein levels. This approach indicated that nicotinamide treatment rewires interaction networks toward dysfunction in DNA damage repair and away from a pro-growth state in TNBC. To our knowledge, the high-resolution network interactions identified in the present study provide the first evidence to comprehensively support the hypothesis of nicotinamide as a novel therapeutic agent in TNBC.
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 10–20% of all breast cancers and is generally associated with a worse prognosis than that of non-TNBC as a result of its aggressive biological behavior and the lack of targeted therapeutic strategies. A systemic chemotherapeutic regimen is the only reliable treatment option; however, pathologically complete remission occurs in approximately only one-third of cases1, which thus necessitates new drug development or the application of agents previously used for the treatment of other diseases, such as metformin2.
Nicotinamide is the active amide form of vitamin B3 or niacin, a precursor for the synthesis of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). NAD has been implicated in genomic stability, apoptosis, cell signaling, stress tolerance, and metabolism3. A recent ONTRAC clinical trial has demonstrated the chemo-preventive effect of nicotinamide in superficial basal-cell carcinomas4. In a previous study, we also identified an inhibitory effect of nicotinamide on the development of pre-neoplastic lesions and the progression of differentiated HCC to a high-grade tumor in animal models5. However, most previous studies have reflected single or a limited number of molecular events, which thereby limits the current understanding of the entire spectrum of complex molecular alterations and interaction networks accompanied by nicotinamide treatment in cancer cells.
Interest in personalized cancer therapy has led to numerous advances in the field of cancer genomics, and next-generation sequencing represents one development that elaborates various types of genomic alterations. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether genomic events are eventually translated into proteomes, which are the final functional units within a cell. In addition, previous studies have exhibited considerable discordance between genomic mutations and protein levels6, 7.
The rapid advances of proteomic technologies with computational algorithms and biochemical technologies have enabled quantitative analyses to evaluate the functional interaction networks, which reflect final cellular functions8; thus, this approach overcomes the limitations of genomic data that exhibit a low correlation between genomic mutations and the expression profiles of their corresponding peptides.
In the present study, we employed whole-transcriptome and global quantitative proteomic methods to characterize how genes and proteins are differentially expressed in nicotinamide-treated TNBC cells. In addition, the identification of the rewiring interaction networks associated with therapy provides additional evidence for the application of nicotinamide to enhance therapeutic benefits in TNBC.
Nicotinamide inhibits TNBC cell growth
To examine how nicotinamide affects cell growth, we treated three types of TNBC cells with nicotinamide in a dose-dependent manner and measured the cell viability using a WST-1 cell proliferation assay to identify the maximum tolerable dose of nicotinamide; the data indicated 25 mM to be the optimal dose of nicotinamide (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S1a). The results are consistent with suppression of growth in treated TNBC cells and support the loss of cell viability as documented in the WST-1 assay (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. S1b). A colony formation assay was performed to investigate the inhibitory function of nicotinamide on the cell viability, which indicated that tumor cells treated with nicotinamide exhibited significantly decreased colony numbers (Fig. 1c and d). Cell cycle analysis and apoptosis assay revealed that nicotinamide triggered S or G1 phase arrest and apoptosis in all kinds of TNBC cells, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2). As a result, we confirmed an inhibitory effect of nicotinamide on cell growth in highly aggressive TNBC cells.
Nicotinamide inhibits SIRT1 deacetylase activity
We further attempted to identify the primary target molecules of nicotinamide in TNBC cells. Previous studies have shown that nicotinamide inhibits SIRT1 enzymatic activity9. In the nicotinamide-treated cells, there was no significant difference in the SIRT1 protein expression. However, western blot analysis indicated that the acetylated-p53 protein expression was significantly increased (Supplementary Fig. S3). The acetylation of p53 represents an active form of p53, which is controlled by SIRT110.
In-depth analysis of transcriptome and proteomics
To obtain a comprehensive perspective of the changes induced by nicotinamide, we determined the transcriptome and proteome profiles of MDA-MB-231 cells treated for 48 h with nicotinamide and untreated as a control (Fig. 2). The mRNA levels in the three biological replicates (Pearson’s correlations ranged from 0.929 to 0.993) were determined using RNA-sequencing, which enabled the quantification of 14,697 transcripts (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Fig. S4a). To measure the protein expression levels, we compared untreated and nicotinamide-treated MDA-MB-231 cells in biological triplicate with mass spectrometry-based protein quantitation using TMT isobaric tagging. In total, we identified 93,978 unique peptides that corresponded to 7,297 protein groups quantified across all six samples (Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Fig. S4b). In regard to the reproducibility of the three biological replicates, we determined that the Pearson’s correlation for each pair of replicates was >0.99 (Supplementary Fig. S4). The median values for the coefficient of variation (CV) for the abundance of proteins between the biological replicates were 2.8% and 1.4% in the non-treated and treated conditions, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S5).
To quantify the changes in the transcriptome and proteome, we set the statistical significance level at P value < 0.05 with minimal fold-changes of ± 2 (transcriptome) and ± 1.2 (proteome). We identified 1,447 genes of higher abundance when MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with nicotinamide, whereas 1,129 genes were of lower mRNA abundance (Supplementary Table S3). In the proteome, a comparative analysis between the non-treated and treated cells identified 3,244 differentially expressed proteins (Supplementary Table S4).
We subsequently compared the transcriptome and proteome changes in response to nicotinamide. For 90% of the proteins quantified by MS, we also obtained an estimate of the mRNA abundance using RNA-sequencing. The Pearson correlation of the transcript and protein abundance is approximately 0.45, which is consistent with previous studies11. We also analyzed the correlation of nicotinamide-induced changes at the transcript level with changes at the proteome level, and the results exhibited a similar correlation (Pearson’s correlation 0.56) consistent with previous findings11. The correlation between the proteomes and corresponding transcriptomes was only 0.4 to 0.5; thus, these results indicated important differences between the transcriptome and proteome11, 12.
Global pathway regulation in response to nicotinamide in breast cancer cells
To characterize the global effect of nicotinamide in breast cancer cells on the protein and transcript levels, we performed a gene ontology term and KEGG enrichment (Supplementary Tables S5 and S6 and Supplementary Fig. S6) and network analysis. Interestingly, we observed that the cell cycle, DNA replication and DNA damage responses were significantly down-regulated at both the transcriptome and proteome levels (Fig. 3).
In addition, we identified a significant up-regulation of many proteins associated with apoptosis and the ER-stress response at the transcriptome and proteome levels, which is consistent with the suppression of cell growth in nicotinamide-treated cells5. However, we found that the pathways involved in the metabolic process were up-regulated at both the transcriptome and proteome levels in the nicotinamide-treated cells. Previous studies have shown that nicotinamide boosts energy reservoirs in the mitochondria13. These studies suggested that nicotinamide treatment may up-regulate metabolic processes in MDA-MB-231 cells.
To exploit a global view of proteins that act together in nicotinamide-treated cells, we constructed functional networks based on gene ontology and pathway enrichment. This analysis indicated links between distinct cellular processes in nicotinamide treated cells. Previous studies have shown the anti-proliferative effect of nicotinamide; however, the underlying mechanisms have not been described in detail. Thus, the present study showed an interaction network related to the anti-proliferative effect of nicotinamide in MDA-MB-231 cells at the transcriptome and proteome levels.
Nicotinamide induced cell cycle arrest
There is accumulating evidence for the regulation of the cell cycle by SIRT1, which primarily promotes cell cycle progression14. Quantitative proteomics demonstrated that the altered expression of 47 peptides modulates the cell cycle. Among their proteomic signatures, 40 protein expression profiles overlapped with mRNA expression, and most of the proteins showed concomitantly reduced mRNA and protein expression according to the Cytoscape analysis (38/47, 80.8%, Fig. 3). In searches using multiple public data resources from the integration of multi-omic expression profiles and information extraction using a literature mining approach, selected 13 factors were predominately involved in the S and G2/M phases (Fig. 4a and b). Initially, these findings prompted the determination of which phase would be arrested during the cell cycle; thus, we performed FACS and confirmed that nicotinamide treatment primarily impeded the cell cycle through the S phase (Supplementary Fig. S2). In the subsequent step, to characterize how cell cycle progression interaction networks are rewired after nicotinamide treatment, we adopted a strategy based on the known interaction networks from systematic text-mining mapped through nicotinamide-induced pathway reconstruction in the transcriptome and proteome profiles obtained in the present study.
The first observation was a substantial decrease of cyclin A (CCNA) expression which was simultaneously measured via western blot analysis. There was no significant difference in mRNA levels of cyclin A (CCNA) (Supplementary Fig. S7). In additional interaction network analyses that utilized bioinformatics pathway/network evaluations, two main streams, including 1) RB-E2F and 2) p53–p21 (TP53-CDKN1A) axis, which ultimately down-regulate cyclin A (CCNA) expression, were identified, which in turn induced cell cycle arrest at the S phase (Fig. 4a and b). Cyclin A (CCNA) is regulated by E2F, which is previously inactivated by the binding of dephosphorylated- or acetylated-RB upstream15. According to previous studies, top-down commands from nicotinamide impair SIRT1 activity, which in turn revitalizes RB activity through acetylation16 and results in the inactivation of E2F, a crucial transcription factor for cyclin A (CCNA)17. These findings are consistent with the increased dephosphorylated- or acetylated-RB protein expression identified using western blot following the ablation of SIRT1 enzymatic activity induced by nicotinamide treatment (Fig. 4c and d).
In addition to the RB and E2F complex axis, in the present study, the mRNA and protein expression of p21 (CDKN1A) was significantly increased in the combinatory transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of the acetylation of p53 (TP53) protein after nicotinamide administration (Supplementary Fig. S7). As a cell-cycle checkpoint, p21 (CDKN1A), a pivotal downstream effector of p53 (TP53), mediates the inactivation of various cyclin-CDK complexes17. Previous studies have also revealed that reduced SIRT1 activity eventually triggered p21 (CDKN1A) signaling activity through the resurgent p53–p21 (TP53-CDKN1A) signaling pathway18.
In the present study, we also identified the rewiring of two novel molecular signals: 1) cyclin B1 (CCNB1), polo-like kinase (PLK1), Aurora A (AURKA) and 2) anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C, ANAPC)-CDH1 complex, mainly engaged in G2/M phase progression. The first three factors are controlled by a transcription factor referred to as FOXM119. In the present study, the FOXM1 and FOXO3 expression was significantly decreased or increased either at the mRNA or protein levels, respectively (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. S7). FOXM1 is inhibited by FOXO320, which is controlled by SIRT121. The APC/C (ANAPC)-CDH1 complex, another signaling axis related to the G2/M phase, primarily mediates the degradation of regulators of cytokinesis and centrosome replication and targets the A/B types of mitotic cyclins and FOXM1 for destruction22 for the negative regulation of Aurora A (AURKA) and PLK123. These results also demonstrated that the expression of these factors was significantly decreased following nicotinamide treatment, which caused the reactivation of the APC/C (ANAPC)-CDH1 complex and played another role in G2/M arrest through cyclin B1 (CCNB1) inactivation. Taken together, these findings suggest that the treatment of nicotinamide provokes novel interaction networks and negatively impacts cell cycle progression through the G2/M border, where the agent initially exhibits a negative feedback to SIRT1, followed by sequential signaling modifications of FOXO3 and FOXM1, which eventually disrupt G2/M phase progression. In addition, the repression of Aurora A (AURKA), PLK1, and cyclin B1 (CCNB1) by the APC/C (ANAPC)-CDH1 complex terminates cell cycle progression at G2/M.
Nicotinamide inhibits multiprotein complex interplay between DNA replication
In addition to a close interaction between nicotinamide and p53 (TP53) in cell cycle progression as previously described in the present study, this agent also exhibited induced changes in the expression of 33 DNA replication complex-related mRNAs and proteins (Fig. 3). Based on previous evidence, we further employed an interaction network analysis, including text-mining methods, to reconstruct a rewired molecular pathway. As a result, nicotinamide modified global transcriptomes and proteomes toward DNA replication complex dysfunction through the strong suppression of several components, such as CDC6, CDC7/DBF4, the mini-chromosome maintenance protein (MCM) complex and polymerase-alpha (POLA), which constituted a complex by which we formulated a more exquisite interaction network triggered by nicotinamide treatment (Fig. 5a and b). RT-PCR also validated reduced single gene’s expression including MCM2, 3, 6 and CDC6, which is coincide with our transcriptomes data (Supplementary Fig. S8). p53 (TP53) contributes to CDC6 inhibition24, which results in a decreased binding affinity to origin-recognition complexes (ORC), and the formation of the pre-replication complexes (pre-RC), followed by the recruitment of the DNA replicative helicase MCM complex25. In addition, the phosphorylation of POLA and MCM protein binding at pre-RC is decreased as a result of the decreased transcript or protein expression of the CDC7/DBF4 complex26, and these interaction flows reflect the impairment of normal DNA replication processes.
Nicotinamide accelerates DNA damage in cancer cells via DNA repair dysfunction
Once DNA is damaged, the S phase checkpoint responds and further postpones the progression of the cell cycle and DNA replication. In the present study, we initially identified S phase arrest followed by nicotinamide treatment (Supplementary Fig. S2) thus, we hypothesized that nicotinamide-induced S phase arrest may reflect treatment-induced DNA damage.
To obtain insight into nicotinamide-induced DNA damage, we assessed γ-H2AX (H2AFX), an indicator of DNA damage, by immunofluorescence and western blotting; augmented γ-H2AX (H2AFX) expression was identified in the treated TNBC cells (Fig. 6a–c). These findings prompted us to evaluate more elaborate interaction networks rewired through the administration of nicotinamide; therefore, a network analysis was conducted based on multi-omics and western blotting combined with text mining. As indicated in Fig. 3, we identified a combinatory reduction of the expression of 19 mRNAs and proteins associated with DNA damage and repair among 28 signatures that exhibited a significant fold-change (67.9%). Consequently, three major pathways and related downstream interaction networks were reconstructed as 1) PARP1-related, 2) ATM-related and 3) ATR-related signaling pathways (Fig. 6d and e).
The cleaved form of PARP1 was significantly increased in the samples treated with nicotinamide as an inactive form of PARP1. Previous studies have also indicated nicotinamide as an exogenous inhibitor that impairs the proper function of PARP1, which primarily involves the repair of damaged DNA27. ATM recognizes double strand DNA breaks via the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRE11-RAD50-NBN1, MRN) complex28.
In the present study, we used RT-PCR and western blot to confirm a significant decrease of ATM expression in the nicotinamide-treated cells (Fig. 6f and g and Supplementary Fig. S9) and transcriptomic changes of MRN expression, which forms a complex signaling axis with ATM by being placed in the upstream region.
Eventually, the complex activates ATM and induces the migration of the repair protein to sites of DNA double-strand breaks. The activation of downstream BRCA1, 2, RAD51 and FANCD2 regulated by the ATM-Chk2 (CHEK2) axis29 was also significantly decreased by nicotinamide treatment in our combinatory proteomics and transcriptomics which eventually hinder the formation of the DNA repair complex and the function of HR-mediated DNA repair. Also, transcript levels of BRCA2, RAD51 and FANCD2 were decreased in nicotinamide treated cells, which were consistent with transcriptomic analysis (Supplementary Fig. S9)
The expression of ATR, another marker of the DNA damage response and repair, was not altered in RT-PCR assays but significantly decreased in the blotting assay (Fig. 6f and g and Supplementary Fig. S9). In addition, the combined mRNA or protein expression of ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP), replication protein A (RPA) and Chk1 (CHEK1) located up- and downstream of ATR was significantly altered in our multi-omic analyses following the administration of nicotinamide (Fig. 6d and e). ATRIP, which is the regulatory partner of ATR, directly binds to RPA-ssDNA; thus, the ATR-ATRIP complex is localized to sites of DNA damage30. A preferred substrate of ATR is the signal transducing kinase Chk1 (CHEK1)31. Activated Chk1 (CHEK1) phosphorylates numerous substrates, including CDC25A and CDC25C, which are involved in cell-cycle progression at the S and G2/M transitions, respectively32. Our interaction network analysis indicates that several crucial players in the control of damaged DNA repair are globally dysregulated after nicotinamide treatment, which eventually impairs the restoration system of cancer cells from hazardous stimulations, such as chemotherapy.
Nicotinamide induces apoptosis via p53 and endoplasmic reticulum stress
Our global interaction network indicated nicotinamide leads to the up-regulation of apoptosis-related networks and ER stress inducible signals, as well as a reduction in the cell cycle progression signal as previously described in the present study (Fig. 3). For further confirmation, we performed a flow cytometry-based Annexin-V/propidium iodide (PI) cell death assay in triplicate and observed nicotinamide induced the early and late stages of apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. S2), which reconfirmed the previous study33.
This finding prompted us to analyze and organize a novel apoptosis-related interaction network induced by nicotinamide. Fifty mRNAs and proteins concordantly expressed were enriched based on the KEGG pathway database. Of these combinatory proteomic and transcriptomic outcomes and combined literature-based analyses (Fig. 7a and b), we reconstructed the nicotinamide induced p53 (TP53) related-apoptotic pathway, in which the acetylated form of p53 (TP53) sequentially activates not BAX, the well-established main factors involved in apoptosis, but PUMA (BBC3) and BAD unexpectedly34, which are subsequently re-located in the mitochondrial membrane where they bind to BCL2 and induce the extra-mitochondrial release of cytochrome c (CYCS) to the cytoplasm35, 36. Additional RT-PCR assays also showed elevated PUMA (BBC3) and BAD mRNA expression to validate the results from transcriptomic analysis (Fig. 7c). Released cytochrome c (CYCS) eventually results in the recruitment, processing and activation of pro-caspase-9 (pro-CASP9) into cleaved caspase-9 (c-CASP9) and subsequently induces the cleavage of caspase-3 (CASP3), an executor of apoptosis (Fig. 7d and e). To determine how caspase plays an important role in nicotinamide-induced apoptosis, Z-VAD-FMK, pan-caspase inhibitor was treated in different conditions described as follows in Supplementary Fig. S10. As a result, we have shown that activation of the caspase-related signaling pathway is crucial for nicotinamide-induced apoptosis through WST-1 assay, flow cytometry and western blotting (Supplementary Fig. S10). XIAP, which represses apoptosis solely through caspase inhibition, was also decreased in the present study and reflects the increased expression of SMAC/DIABLO increasingly released from the mitochondria after nicotinamide treatment, which neutralizes the caspase-inhibitory properties of the IAP family of proteins, particularly XIAP37.
In the present study, the mitochondrial fission protein Drp-1 (DNM1L) was also up-regulated at the proteomic levels. Drp-1 (DNM1L) is typically localized at the surface of mitochondria, and its overexpression increases the number of mitochondrial division events, which mediate apoptosis; thus, it is used to assess the role of mitochondrial division in apoptosis38.
In addition to apoptosis, the results of the interaction network analysis indicated the concomitant up-regulation of ER stress-related factors, including inositol-requiring protein-1 (IRE1, ERN1), binding immunoglobulin protein (Bip, HSPA5), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), glucose regulated protein 58 (GRP58, PDIA3), GRP94 (HSP90B1), GRP170 (HYOU1), growth arrest and DNA damage 153 (GADD153 and DDIT3), endoplasmic reticulum resident protein 44 (ERP44), ERp70 (PDIA4) and homocysteine-responsive endoplasmic reticulum-resident ubiquitin-like domain member 1 protein (HERPUD1), which partially overlapped with apoptosis (Fig. 3).
Previous studies have also suggested ER stress-induced apoptosis39. This finding prompted us to perform additional enrichment analyses to generate a combined interaction network between apoptosis and ER stress following nicotinamide treatment. ER-stress triggers the unfolded protein response (UPR), distinguished by the action of three signaling proteins, namely, IRE1 (ERN1), protein kinase RNA (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK, EIF2AK3), and ATF6. Specifically, activated IRE1 (ERN1) promotes a phosphorylation cascade that ultimately activates Jun amino-terminal kinase (JNK, MAPK8)40. In this interaction network analysis combined with western blotting and RT-PCR, the IRE1 (ERN1) and JNK (MAPK8) axis was activated, which ultimately activates BAD41, a major component of apoptosis that promotes the leakage of cytochrome c (CYCS) into the cytoplasm (Supplementary Fig. S11). Thus, taken together, we concluded that nicotinamide induces apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway and ER stress.
The current findings highlight how the combined-omics with transcriptome and high-throughput proteomics and systematic networking analysis may provide a better understanding of how nicotinamide modifies molecular signaling mechanisms and generates an integrated picture of the complex rewiring of the critical pathways away from tumor growth in TNBC cells. These findings provide evidence that nicotinamide primarily targets SIRT1 for negative regulation in cancer cell survival, which eventually triggers 1) S phase arrest through the restoration of RB and p53–p21 (TP53-CDKN1A) axis based activity and G2/M phase disturbances through the FOXM1-cyclin B1 (CCNB1) axis, 2) the execution of apoptosis and 3) the widespread dysfunction of DNA damage repair. Overall, systematic p53 (TP53) acetylation and SIRT1 inactivation initially play a pivotal role and eventually rewire downstream global interaction networks toward anti-tumor growth through the arrest of cell cycle progression, while promoting pro-cellular death conditions via the dysfunction of DNA damage repair and pro-apoptotic actions.
In the cell cycle progression pathway, the attenuation of the mitotic cell cycle checkpoint is regulated by the Aurora A (AURKA), PLK1 and cyclin B1(CCNB1)-mediated pathways accompanied by the down-regulation of multiple genes implicated in the mitotic spindle checkpoint, such as BUB1, MAD2L1, KIF2A, CDCA and SPC proteins. In addition, these expression changes are consistent with the changes of many other genes involved in chromosome segregation, centrosome function, cytokinesis, and the transition into and progression through mitosis.
The current findings also indicated the combined modification of broad apoptotic and ER stress-related genes and proteins. The observational data elucidates two major signaling mechanisms that trigger apoptosis: 1) ER stress inducible apoptosis via the IRE1 (ERN1) and JNK (MAPK8) pathway and 2) SIRT1 and the p53 (TP53) axis following nicotinamide treatment.
In addition to the activation of anti-tumor growth signaling pathways, we identified globally dysregulated functions of the DNA repair pathway induced by nicotinamide administration. These findings may ultimately lead to the application of nicotinamide to enhance chemotherapeutic benefits, such as the PARP1 inhibitor, olaparib, which disturbs repair functions for damaged DNA as a result of the nicotinamide-mediated disruption of major repair genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, ATR, ATM and PARP1, in the multi-omic analysis in the present study.
Moreover, the expression of 21 of 150 proteins was discordant compared with their relevant mRNA expression (14.0%). We propose that this effect may reflect multiple post-translational modifications (PTM) that play crucial roles in the regulation of protein functions, including phosphorylation, ubiquitination or acetylation42. The follow-up integrated proteomic analysis of PTM will further the holistic view of the interaction networks in TNBC cells treated with nicotinamide.
In summary, these data provide global molecular evidence for the crucial role of nicotinamide in the induction of signaling alterations toward the anti-tumor growth and pro-death of tumor cells in TNBC by combining transcriptomic and high-throughput proteomic analysis. To our knowledge, we reported the first combinatory multi-omics and interaction networking study based on a text-based mining approach that aimed to understand the therapeutic potential of nicotinamide. These findings will provide more apparent knowledge for the future application of the agent in TNBC as the ONTRAC clinical trial indicated optimistic beneficial outcomes.
Materials and Methods
Cell line culture and proliferation assay
The TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231 was kindly provided by Prof. Moon Hyeong-Gon (Seoul National University Hospital) and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Hyclone) supplemented with 10% FBS (Hyclone) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Gibco). The cells were seeded in triplicate onto 96-well culture plates. After 24 hours (h) of cultivation, the cells were treated with various concentrations of nicotinamide (Sigma-Aldrich) in a dose-dependent manner and Z-VAD-FMK, a pan-caspase inhibitor (Novus). After incubation for 0, 24 and 48 h, the cell viability was assessed using Premix WST-1 (Takara) measured at a wavelength of 450–650 nm.
Colony formation assay
MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded onto 6-well plates at 1,000 cells per well. Following incubation for 11 days, the colonies were fixed with 4% formaldehyde (Junsei) in PBS for 20 min and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 30 min. The number of stained colonies was counted to compare the colony formation ability (surviving colonies >50 cells per colony).
Detection of apoptosis and cell cycle via flow cytometry
To evaluate nicotinamide-induced apoptosis, the MEBCYTO Apoptosis kit (MBL) was used. MDA-MB-231 cells were collected, and Annexin-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) were added to the cells. The cells were mixed with the reagents and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 5–15 min. Analysis using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) was performed to discriminate apoptotic cells.
To assess the effects of nicotinamide on the cell cycle, cells with or without nicotinamide treatment were fixed in cold ethanol for 24 h. Prior to detection, the ethanol was removed, and the cells were resuspended in staining buffer [50 μg/ml PI (Sigma- Aldrich) and 50 μg/ml RNase in PBS)] for 20 min at room temperature. The samples were analyzed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) to determine the cell cycle distribution.
Western blot analysis
The cells were lysed in a T-PER buffer (Thermo Scientific) that contained protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), and 20–40 μg of the cell lysates were separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore). The blots were blocked in 5% skim milk and probed with antibodies against the appropriate primary antibodies (Table S1) for 18 h. After washing, the blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and visualized using ECL detection reagent (Elpis). The densitometric analysis of the protein expression was quantitated using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
MDA-MB-231 cells were grown on coverslips at 70% confluence. Immunostaining was performed on cells fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 10 min. The primary antibody anti-p-γ-H2AX was used to assess DNA damage (Cell Signaling Technology). The secondary antibody included Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-Rabbit IgG antibody (Invitrogen). Nuclear counterstaining with Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Scientific) was performed after the removal of excess secondary antibody. Immunostaining was visualized using a Confocal-A1 microscope (Nikon).
RNA extraction and RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from MDA-MB-231 cells using TRIzol reagent (Invtrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. An amount of 2 μg of total RNA was used in the reverse transcription reaction. The first strand cDNA was synthesized using standard random priming method with Moloney Murin Leukemia Virus reverse transcripts (Promega) and RNase inhibitor (Promega). After cDNA was synthesized, the primers of target genes were employed and HIPI Plus Master Mix (Elpis) was used to amplify the genes. The primer sequences for RT-PCR were listed in Supplementary Table S8.
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was isolated from MDA-MB-231 cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). The total RNA quality and quantity were validated on a NanoCrop1000 spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) and Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies). We used the TruSeq RNA library preparation kit (Illumina). We constructed the Illumina-compatible libraries according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Additional information is provided in the supplementary experimental procedures.
RNA library preparation and sequencing
To construct cDNA libraries using the TruSeq RNA library kit (Illumina), 1 µg of total RNA was used. The libraries were quantified using qPCR according to the qPCR Quantification Protocol Guide and qualified using an Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). To estimate the expression levels, the aligned reads were counted for each gene using featureCounts v.1.4.6-p443. Differentially expressed genes were estimated using DESeq v.1.25.044, and a gene set enrichment analysis was performed using GSEA2 v.2.2.245. The detailed process of the data analysis is described in the supplementary experimental procedures.
Proteome sample preparation
MDA-MB-231 cells were lysed in SDS-lysis buffer. After alkylation and reduction, the proteins were digested using an FASP procedure as previously described46. Tandem mass tag (TMT) 6-plex labeling was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with modifications. After the labeled peptides were pooled, the samples were separated using high-pH reversed phased liquid chromatography. Additional information is provided in the supplemental experimental procedures.
Mass spectrometry analysis and data processing
The fractionated peptides were analyzed using Quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometry, consisting of a Q-exactive Plus (Thermo Scientific) coupled to an Ultimate 3000 RSLC system (Dionex) via a nano electrospray source as previously described, with modifications46, 47. Protein identification and quantification were performed using Proteome Discoverer 2.1 software interfaced with the SEQUEST-HT search engine based on the Human UniProt database (December 2014; 88,657 entries). The detailed process of data analysis is described in the supplementary experimental procedures.
MS raw files were processed using Proteome Discoverer 2.1 software interfaced with the SEQUEST-HT search engine based on the Human UniProt database (December 2014, 88,657 entries), which included forward and reverse protein sequences and common contaminants. Searches were performed using a 10-ppm precursor ion tolerance for total protein level analysis. The MS/MS ion tolerance was set to 20 ppm. TMT tags on lysine residues and peptide N termini (+229.163 Da) and carbamido-methylation of cysteine residues (+57.021 Da) were set as fixed modifications, whereas the oxidation of methionine residues (+15.995 Da) was set as a variable modification. The false discovery rate (FDR) for all PSM, peptides, and protein assignments was determined using the Percolator software package. Reporter ion quantification was performed in the MS2 channel with a 20-ppm mass tolerance. Only PSMs that contained all 6 reporter ions were considered. Each reporter ion channel was summed across all quantified proteins and normalized with the assumption of equal protein loading for all 6 samples.
Bioinformatics and statistical analysis
The statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-tests. The threshold of significance was set at P < 0.05. A bioinformatics analysis was performed using Perseus software48. Statistical analysis of the proteome was performed based on the logarithmized intensities of the TMT-reporter ions. To identify significantly expressed proteins, we performed a two-sample t-test analysis using a Benjamini-Hochberg FDR cutoff of 0.05. The gene ontology of the analyzed proteins was explicated using the DAVID bioinformatics tool (http://david.abcc.ncifcrif.gov/). The pathways were analyzed using the KEGG database. Interaction network models were constructed using Cytoscape ver3.4.049 and Illustrator (Adobe). All proteomic datasets were submitted to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomechange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository50 (Accession number PXD005304). All transcriptomic datasets were submitted to the SRA site (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) and received accession number (SRP093217).
Bear, H. D. et al. Bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 366, 310–320, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1111097 (2012).
Kasznicki, J., Sliwinska, A. & Drzewoski, J. Metformin in cancer prevention and therapy. Ann Transl Med 2, 57, doi:10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.06.01 (2014).
Malavasi, F. et al. Evolution and function of the ADP ribosyl cyclase/CD38 gene family in physiology and pathology. Physiol Rev 88, 841–886, doi:10.1152/physrev.00035.2007 (2008).
Chen, A. C. et al. A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Nicotinamide for Skin-Cancer Chemoprevention. New Engl J Med 373, 1618–1626, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1506197 (2015).
Park, S. Y., Lee, K. B., Lee, M. J., Bae, S. C. & Jang, J. J. Nicotinamide inhibits the early stage of carcinogen-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in mice and suppresses human hepatocellular carcinoma cell growth. Journal of Cellular Physiology 227, 899–908, doi:10.1002/jcp.22799 (2012).
Myhre, S. et al. Influence of DNA copy number and mRNA levels on the expression of breast cancer related proteins. Mol Oncol 7, 704–718, doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2013.02.018 (2013).
Park, E. S. et al. Integrative analysis of proteomic signatures, mutations, and drug responsiveness in the NCI 60 cancer cell line set. Mol Cancer Ther 9, 257–267, doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0743 (2010).
Cohen, A. A. et al. Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science 322, 1511–1516, doi:10.1126/science.1160165 (2008).
Avalos, J. L., Bever, K. M. & Wolberger, C. Mechanism of sirtuin inhibition by nicotinamide: altering the NAD(+) cosubstrate specificity of a Sir2 enzyme. Mol Cell 17, 855–868, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.022 (2005).
Kim, E. J., Kho, J. H., Kang, M. R. & Um, S. J. Active regulator of SIRT1 cooperates with SIRT1 and facilitates suppression of p53 activity. Mol Cell 28, 277–290, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.030 (2007).
Schwanhausser, B. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337–342, doi:10.1038/nature10098 (2011).
Zhang, B. et al. Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 513, 382–387, doi:10.1038/nature13438 (2014).
Yang, S. J. et al. Nicotinamide improves glucose metabolism and affects the hepatic NAD-sirtuin pathway in a rodent model of obesity and type 2 diabetes. J Nutr Biochem 25, 66–72, doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.09.004 (2014).
Sallam, R. M. Proteomics in cancer biomarkers discovery: challenges and applications. Dis Markers 2015, 321370, doi:10.1155/2015/321370 (2015).
Knudsen, K. E., Fribourg, A. F., Strobeck, M. W., Blanchard, J.-M. & Knudsen, E. S. Cyclin A Is a Functional Target of Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Protein-mediated Cell Cycle Arrest. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 27632–27641, doi:10.1074/jbc.274.39.27632 (1999).
Wong, S. & Weber Jason D. Deacetylation of the retinoblastoma tumour suppressor protein by SIRT1. Biochemical Journal 407, 451–460, doi:10.1042/bj20070151 (2007).
Soucek, T., Pusch, O., Hengstschlager-Ottnad, E., Adams, P. D. & Hengstschlager, M. Deregulated expression of E2F-1 induces cyclin A- and E-associated kinase activities independently from cell cycle position. Oncogene 14, 2251–2257, doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1201061 (1997).
Inoue, Y., Iemura, S., Natsume, T., Miyazawa, K. & Imamura, T. Suppression of p53 activity through the cooperative action of Ski and histone deacetylase SIRT1. J Biol Chem 286, 6311–6320, doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.177683 (2011).
Shujie Yang, K. K. La. X. M. MTDH and FOXM1, Two Master Regulators in Gynecologic Cancer. Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2, 1011 (2013).
Lam, E. W., Brosens, J. J., Gomes, A. R. & Koo, C. Y. Forkhead box proteins: tuning forks for transcriptional harmony. Nat Rev Cancer 13, 482–495, doi:10.1038/nrc3539 (2013).
Bicknell, K. A. F. (FOX) transcription factors and the cell cycle: measurement of DNA binding by FoxO and FoxM transcription factors. Methods Mol Biol 296, 247–262 (2005).
Laoukili, J., Alvarez-Fernandez, M., Stahl, M. & Medema, R. H. FoxM1 is degraded at mitotic exit in a Cdh1-dependent manner. Cell Cycle 7, 2720–2726, doi:10.4161/cc.7.17.6580 (2008).
Almeida, A. Regulation of APC/C-Cdh1 and its function in neuronal survival. Mol Neurobiol 46, 547–554, doi:10.1007/s12035-012-8309-2 (2012).
Duursma, A. & Agami, R. p53-Dependent regulation of Cdc6 protein stability controls cellular proliferation. Mol Cell Biol 25, 6937–6947, doi:10.1128/MCB.25.16.6937-6947.2005 (2005).
Kundu, L. R. et al. Deregulated Cdc6 inhibits DNA replication and suppresses Cdc7-mediated phosphorylation of Mcm2-7 complex. Nucleic Acids Res 38, 5409–5418, doi:10.1093/nar/gkq262 (2010).
Ramer, M. D. et al. Dbf4 and Cdc7 Proteins Promote DNA Replication through Interactions with Distinct Mcm2–7 Protein Subunits. Journal of Biological Chemistry 288, 14926–14935, doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.392910 (2013).
Turunc Bayrakdar, E., Uyanikgil, Y., Kanit, L., Koylu, E. & Yalcin, A. Nicotinamide treatment reduces the levels of oxidative stress, apoptosis, and PARP-1 activity in Abeta(1–42)-induced rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radic Res 48, 146–158, doi:10.3109/10715762.2013.857018 (2014).
Duursma, A. M., Driscoll, R., Elias, J. E. & Cimprich, K. A. A role for the MRN complex in ATR activation via TOPBP1 recruitment. Mol Cell 50, 116–122, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.006 (2013).
Roy, R., Chun, J. & Powell, S. N. BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection. Nat Rev Cancer 12, 68–78, doi:10.1038/nrc3181 (2012).
Ball, H. L., Myers, J. S. & Cortez, D. ATRIP binding to replication protein A-single-stranded DNA promotes ATR-ATRIP localization but is dispensable for Chk1 phosphorylation. Mol Biol Cell 16, 2372–2381, doi:10.1091/mbc.E04-11-1006 (2005).
McGowan, C. H. & Russell, P. The DNA damage response: sensing and signaling. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 16, 629–633, doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.005 (2004).
Takeda, D. Y. & Dutta, A. DNA replication and progression through S phase. Oncogene 24, 2827–2843, doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208616 (2005).
Audrito, V. et al. Nicotinamide blocks proliferation and induces apoptosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells through activation of the p53/miR-34a/SIRT1 tumor suppressor network. Cancer Res 71, 4473–4483, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4452 (2011).
Jiang, P., Du, W. & Wu, M. p53 and Bad: remote strangers become close friends. Cell Res 17, 283–285, doi:10.1038/cr.2007.19 (2007).
Nakano, K. & Vousden, K. H. PUMA, a novel proapoptotic gene, is induced by p53. Mol Cell 7, 683–694 (2001).
Jiang, P., Du, W., Heese, K. & Wu, M. The Bad guy cooperates with good cop p53: Bad is transcriptionally up-regulated by p53 and forms a Bad/p53 complex at the mitochondria to induce apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 26, 9071–9082, doi:10.1128/MCB.01025-06 (2006).
Du, C., Fang, M., Li, Y., Li, L. & Wang, X. Smac, a mitochondrial protein that promotes cytochrome c-dependent caspase activation by eliminating IAP inhibition. Cell 102, 33–42 (2000).
Smirnova, E., Griparic, L., Shurland, D.-L. & van der Bliek, A. M. Dynamin-related Protein Drp1 Is Required for Mitochondrial Division in Mammalian Cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell 12, 2245–2256 (2001).
Sano, R. & Reed, J. C. ER stress-induced cell death mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833, 3460–3470, doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.06.028 (2013).
Urano, F. et al. Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1. Science 287, 664–666 (2000).
Li, B. et al. Differences in endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling kinetics determine cell survival outcome through activation of MKP-1. Cell Signal 23, 35–45, doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.07.019 (2011).
Jensen, O. N. Interpreting the protein language using proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7, 391–403 (2006).
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 (2014).
Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11, R106, doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 (2010).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 15545–15550, doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 (2005).
Han, D. et al. In-depth proteomic analysis of mouse microglia using a combination of FASP and StageTip-based, high pH, reversed-phase fractionation. Proteomics 13, 2984–2988, doi:10.1002/pmic.201300091 (2013).
Han, D., Jin, J., Woo, J., Min, H. & Kim, Y. Proteomic analysis of mouse astrocytes and their secretome by a combination of FASP and StageTip-based, high pH, reversed-phase fractionation. Proteomics 14, 1604–1609, doi:10.1002/pmic.201300495 (2014).
Tyanova, S. et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat Methods 13, 731–740, doi:10.1038/nmeth.3901 (2016).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13, 2498–2504, doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 (2003).
Vizcaino, J. A. et al. ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat Biotechnol 32, 223–226, doi:10.1038/nbt.2839 (2014).
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning)(2015R1C1A1A01055032).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J.Y., Lee, H., Woo, J. et al. Reconstruction of pathway modification induced by nicotinamide using multi-omic network analyses in triple negative breast cancer. Sci Rep 7, 3466 (2017) doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03322-7
Nicotinamide Overcomes Doxorubicin Resistance of Breast Cancer Cells through Deregulating SIRT1/Akt Pathway
Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry (2019)
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2018)