Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D Printed Tablets for Intragastric Floating Delivery of Domperidone


The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing to prepare intragastric floating sustained release (FSR) tablets. Domperidone (DOM), an insoluble weak base, was chosen as a model drug to investigate the potential of FSR in increasing its oral bioavailability and reducing its administration frequency. DOM was successfully loaded into hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) filaments using hot melt extrusion (HME). The filaments were then printed into hollow structured tablets through changing the shell numbers and the infill percentages. Physical characterization results indicated that the majority of DOM gradually turned into the amorphous form during the fabrication process. The optimized formulation (contain 10% DOM, with 2 shells and 0% infill) exhibited the sustained release characteristic and was able to float for about 10 h in vitro. Radiographic images showed that the BaSO4-labeled tablets were retained in the stomach of rabbits for more than 8 h. Furthermore, pharmacokinetic studies showed the relative bioavailability of the FSR tablets compared with reference commercial tablets was 222.49 ± 62.85%. All the results showed that FDM based 3D printing might be a promising way to fabricate hollow tablets for the purpose of intragastric floating drug delivery.


Oral drug administration is the predominant and most convenient route in clinical practice. However, oral drug absorption is often unsatisfactory and highly variable among the individuals due to the physiological variability such as irregular gastrointestinal transit and emptying time1. A short gastric residence time may result in incomplete drug release from the delivery vehicle, subsequently leading to poor therapeutic effect2. Several novel gastroretentive delivery systems have been explored to overcome the shortcomings above, including polymer bioadhesive systems, swelling and expanding systems, high-density systems and floating systems3. The floating systems are low-density systems that have sufficient buoyancy to float over the gastric contents and remain in the stomach for a prolonged and predictable period4. It can enhance the solubility of weakly basic drug in an acid environment and improve the patient compliance by decreasing dosing frequency5.

Domperidone (DOM) is a dopamine (D2) receptor antagonist, widely used in the treatment of gastroparesis and other conditions causing chronic nausea and vomiting6. It is a poorly water-soluble weak base (pKa1 = 7.8, pKa2 = 11.5) with good solubility in acidic condition whereas in neutral and alkaline environments its solubility is largely reduced7. The oral bioavailability of DOM was reported in the range of 13–17% probably as a result of both incomplete absorption and first-pass metabolism6. In humans, DOM is mainly absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract and peak plasma concentration was observed 30 min after oral (fasted) administration. It is recommended to take three times a day due to the short elimination half-life of about 7.5 h6. Therefore, DOM was considered to be a suitable candidate for intragastric floating sustained delivery to increase its oral bioavailability and reduce the frequency of administration8, 9.

The recent FDA approval of the first three dimensional (3D) printed tablets, Spritam (levetiracetam), opened a new chapter in 3D printing for pharmaceutical applications10,11,12. 3D printing is a layer-by-layer process to form 3D objects from digital designs using plastic and metal materials13. Amongst the different developed 3D printing technologies, fused deposition modeling (FDM) has several significant advantages such as low-cost manufacturing, the compatibility of using the combination of pharmaceutical grade polymers with APIs through hot-melt extrusion (HME) and the ability to fabricate hollow objects14,15,16. Previous pharmaceutical researchers attempted to use FDM-based 3D printing mainly in fabricating drug delivery systems with immediate or controlled release characteristics17,18,19, hot-melt extruding filaments of pharmaceutical grade polymers15, 20, 21, lowering printing temperatures22, and preparing personalized topical drug delivery together with 3D scanning23. To our knowledge, there is no report on the FDM based hollow tablets for intragastric floating sustained release (FSR) of drugs.

In FDM 3D printing, shells and infill are the key parameters which define the outline shape and inner support structure of an object. At least one shell is needed to print an object, and additional shells will add body’s strength and weight but consume more printing time and materials. Similarly, infill percentage is another parameter which could be adjusted from 0% to 100%, generating the object from completely hollow structure to fully solid filled structure. Based on this hollow structure concept, the aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of printing DOM intragastric floating sustained release (DOM-FSR) tablets to reduce the frequency of administration to twice daily by changing the shell numbers and infill percentages. We also aimed to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo properties of these hollow structures.

Results and Discussion

Preparation of filaments and DOM-FSR tablets

Polymer filaments are feed stock materials for FDM 3D printing. Several pharmaceutical grade polymers, including HPC, were recently investigated to obtain drug loaded filaments via HME15, 17, 21. A capsular device printed by FDM using HPC filament was explored for pulsatile drug release16. The rigid outer shell of HPC led to slow solvent penetration, and the inner loaded drug released immediately after a lag phase for about 2 h16. Enlightened by this paper, we developed the hollow-structured tablets for intragastric drug delivery. The outer shell was constructed by DOM-loaded HPC filaments, and the inner filled drug was replaced by air to maintain the whole tablets in a low-density state. The formulation and HME parameters of filaments are shown in Table S1. HPC, DOM/HPC (10/90, w/w), and BaSO4/DOM/HPC (10/10/80, w/w/w) were continuously extruded at a screw speed of 20–25 rpm. The hot-melt extrusion was performed in 145–150 °C and the torque was in the range of 10–20 N/cm without help of plasticizer. The extruded HPC filament has a transparent appearance while the HPC filaments loaded with DOM or BaSO4 have a white or slightly yellow opaque look (Fig. 1A), which indicated that the DOM and BaSO4 still existed in the form of particles after HME process.

Figure 1

Image of HME fabricated filaments (A): HPC filament, DOM-HPC filament, and BaSO4-HPC filament (from left to right); SEM images of filaments: HPC filament (B), DOM-HPC filament (C), and BaSO4-HPC filament (D).

Cylinder shaped tablets with different dimensions, shell numbers and infill percentages were printed using the filaments fabricated by HME. The formulation and designed physical parameter of DOM-FSR tablets was described in Table S2. The measured volume, weighted mass and calculated density were presented in Table S3. Tablets were designed and printed in two different sizes: the tablets with 10 × 3.2 mm (diameter × height, D × H) were used for the formulation research, while the tablets with 7.4 × 6 mm (diameter × height, D × H) were used for the in vivo evaluation in rabbits, considering the feasibility of feeding the tablets to rabbits in an integral state24. After FDM printing, tablets loaded with DOM had been converted from white (filament color) into transparent yellow (Fig. 2A), while BaSO4 labeled tablets remained white opaque look (Fig. 2B). This phenomenon indicated that the majority of DOM particles have turned into amorphous form with the incensement of preparation temperature.

Figure 2

Images of 3D printed tablets: DOM-HPC tablet (A) and BaSO4-HPC tablet (B); SEM images of tablet side surfaces: DOM-HPC tablet (a) and BaSO4-HPC tablet (b).

Characterization of filaments and DOM-FSR tablets

The use of high temperature during HME and FDM 3D printing can lead to the degradation of thermo-labile drugs and polymers25. In this work, no significant mass loss was found in the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) from 145 °C to 150 °C (HME process temperature) for both pure materials and mixtures (Fig. S1). DOM is a thermal stable compound with a melting point about 249 °C, no significant mass loss was found from 150 °C to 210 °C, while only 0.4–0.6% of loss in mass was found in HPC and extruded filament samples. These results were further confirmed by the content determination (DOM were found to have recovery of 99.7–100.2% in both filaments and tablets samples). The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of micronized DOM, HPC, physical mixtures (HPC/DOM = 9:1), filaments (HPC/DOM = 9:1) and DOM-FSR tablets (HPC/DOM = 9:1) were shown in Fig. S2. The curve of micronized DOM showed an endothermic peak at approximately 249 °C. The endothermic peak of DOM was negative shift to approximately 229 °C in the case of the physical mixture, further shrunk and shifted to lower temperature in filaments, and completely disappeared after tablet printing. The percentages of crystallinity, were 83.7%, 22.8% and 0% for physical mixture, extruded filaments and printed tablets respectively, which indicated a gradually reduction through the thermal and mechanical related processes. FT-IR spectroscopy was conducted to confirm the interaction between DOM and HPC. As shown in Fig. S3, the characteristic peaks of DOM appeared in 1719 and 1694 cm−1 of C = O, 1489 cm−1 of C-N, and 732 cm−1 of C-Cl, while the spectrum of HPC showed the characteristic peaks at 3463 cm−1 of O-H, 2972 cm−1, 2933 cm−1, 1459 cm−1 and 1375 cm−1 of C-H, 1275 cm−1, 1120 cm−1 and 1080 cm−1 of C-O-C. The physical mixture, extruded filaments and printed tablets showed approximately the superimposition of the drug and HPC, except for a slight shifting of C = O to low wave numbers of 1718 and 1692 cm−1. This indicated hydrogen bonding existing between the double carbonyl group of DOM and the hydrogen group of HPC (Chemical structure of DOM and HPC were described in Fig. S4), which may account for the obvious low-temperature melting peak shift found in DSC spectra.

X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD) indicated typical crystalline peaks of pure DOM at 2Theta = 14.2, 15.7 and 22.8 (Fig. S3). These peaks were still detected in the physical mixtures, but decreased in filaments and disappeared in the tablets. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (Fig. 1B,C,D) showed DOM-HPC filament had a similarly smooth surface like blank HPC filament, while BaSO4 loaded filament had a relatively rough surface due to the infusible BaSO4 of high melting point. Similarly, the lateral side of DOM-HPC tablet had a smoother layered view than BaSO4-HPC tablet (Fig. 2A,B). All these tendencies suggested that DOM crystal had transformed into partially crystallized form in filaments, and further into amorphous form with the increase of manufacturing temperature from 145–150 °C of HME to 210 °C of 3D printing.

In vitro floating and release

In this experiment, the tablet densities were observed highly correlated with floating capacity. The optimized DOM-FSR tablets (Table S2, F2) with density of 0.77 g/cm3 had the capability of floating for more than 10 h (Fig. 3), while tablets with density of above 0.9 g/cm3 tended to sink to the bottom of the dissolution vessels in less than 1 h (Table S2). The optimized tablets (Table S2, F2) with 2 shells and 0% infill had a relative lower density of 0.77 g/cm3, and would be able to float for more than 10 h in vitro (Fig. 3). In contrast, the tablets with shells more than 3 or infill percentage more than 20% (Table S3, F4, F7), had a relative higher density of more than 0.9 g/cm3, would sink to the bottom of the dissolution vessels within less than 1 h. Considering the tablet’s density and buoyancy, the shell numbers and infill percentages were strictly limited (Table S2, S3).

Figure 3

Drug release profiles of the formulations used in the experiments (n = 6): (A) comparison of commercial fast-release tablets and DOM-FSR tablets, (B) the influence of shell numbers, (C) the influence of infill percentages, and (D) comparison of the tablets with optimized parameters, tablets used for pharmacokinetic study, and tablets used for X-ray imaging.

An immediate drug release rate was achieved following the dissolution of two pills of Motilium® (10 mg) in 0.1 N HCl, where 99.9% of the drug was released within 15 min, while the DOM-FSR tablet (Table S2, F2) released only 3% after 15 min, and achieved sustained release of 99.9% for 12 h (Fig. 4A). Different shell numbers (from 1–3, Table S2, F1–F3) and infill percentages (from 0–20%, Table S2, F2, F5 and F6) did not significantly influence the release rates of tablets (Fig. 4B,C). Although BaSO4 has a higher density of 4.5 g/cm3, 10% barium sulfate-loaded tablets showed a similar capability to float and sustain the drug release for more than 10 h in vitro (Table S2, Fig. 4D).

Figure 4

Photographs of DOM-FSR tablets floating in dissolution medium (0.1 N HCl solution) at 37 ± 0.5 °C. (A) t = 1 h, (B) t = 2 h, (C) t = 4 h and (D) t = 8 h.

In vivo floating and release

The rate and extent of oral drug absorption is determined by a complicated process, which is not only dependent on the drug physicochemical properties but also the interaction between the gastrointestinal tract and the administrated formulation26. The FDM based 3D printed tablets usually have a rigid structure like hard plastic with different features from conventional tablets25. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this may be the first work to examine the in vivo behavior of FDM based tablets considering the interaction between gastrointestinal tract and tablets with unique physical characteristics. Figure 5 showed the X-ray images of the BaSO4-labeled tablets, which were floating in the New Zealand rabbits’ stomachs. The BaSO4-labeled tablets were clearly observed to stay in the stomach for 8 h (Fig. 5A–D), become fuzzy and indistinct at 10 h (Fig. 5E), and finally disappear at 12 h (Fig. 6F).

Figure 5

A-F X-rays indicating the positions of the BaSO4-labeled DOM-FSR tablets in the gastrointestinal tract of New Zealand rabbits at different time points. X-rays taken at (A) 2 h, (B) 4 h, (C) 6 h, (D) 8 h, (E) 10 h, and (F) 12 h.

Figure 6

Plasma concentration-time (Means ± SD) profile of 20 mg DOM after oral administration of Motilium and DOM-FSR tablets in 8 New Zealand rabbits.

For pharmacokinetic studies, rabbits were administered with 20 mg DOM in commercial tablets (Motilium®, 2 pills) or in-house FSR tablets (Table S2, F8). The mean plasma concentration-time curve of the test and reference tablets in eight New Zealand rabbits were shown in Fig. 6 and the relevant pharmacokinetic parameters were summarized in Table 1. The relative bioavailability of the floating tablets was 222.49 ± 62.85% compared with the commercial tablets. The mean peak plasma concentration of DOM (Cmax) after a single oral dose of 20 mg was detected to be 596.167 ± 143.132 and 505.983 ± 43.175 ng/mL for the Motilium and DOM-FSR tablet, respectively. Cmax was achieved after 1.5 h with the Motilium, while tmax of the DOM-FSR tablet was 5 h. These in vivo results indicated that the gastro floating tablets had exhibited a significantly prolonged steady release of the drug (p < 0.05) and was consistent with in vitro floating results. DOM is an insoluble weak base with pH-dependent release property, and its solubility was reported as low as 0.986 mg/L in water27. As described in the former research7, DOM powder could dissolve to 91% in 2 h in pH1.2 buffer, but only about 16% was achieved in up to 8 h in pH6.8 buffer. In that work7, an enteric hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate (HPMCP) and insoluble ethylcellulose were used to prepare DOM coevaporates for the controlled release in gastrointestinal tract. One group was administrated with coevaporates containing 10 mg of DOM, and the other group was given conventional tablet with the same dose. The mean value of AUC0→∞ for coevaporate group was 247 h·ng/mL and for the conventional tablet group was 153 h·ng/mL. These results supported our work’s finding of the improvement of the oral bioavailability in rabbits with 3D printed FSR tablet. It can be inferred that the rapid dissolution of DOM in the acid medium of stomach might result in a quick precipitation after transferring into the neutral or basic environment of small intestine. Although DOM suffered from a first-pass metabolism after oral administration, the prolonged residence of DOM from 3D printed FSR tablet in the stomach might retard the formation of supersaturated solution and prevent precipitating in the small intestine. This might be the reasons explaining the incensement of oral bioavailability for DOM-FSR tablets.

Table 1 Pharmacokinetic parameters of Motilium and DOM-FSR tablets after oral administration of 20 mg (means ± SD, n = 8, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).


In summary, our study for the first time confirmed the feasibility of fabricating intragastric drug delivery device by FDM 3D printing, which holds high potential to develop a rapid and low-cost platform utilized for drug screening and personalized medical care. The DOM-FSR tablet with hollow structure was successfully fabricated and the buoyancy of tablets was closely related to their densities. Due to the rigid shells produced by melting deposition, HPC polymer chains dissociated slowly and thus produced the FSR affect. Physical characterization indicated that the state of DOM distributed in the HPC was converted into a solid dispersion with temperature elevating processes. Prolonged floating and release was observed both in vitro and in vivo. The increased oral bioavailability and steady plasma concentration of DOM demonstrated the promising application of DOM-FSR tablet to reduce the frequency of administration and improve patients’ compliance.

Materials and Methods


DOM (99.9%) purchased from Tianbin Biotechnology (Shaanxi, China), was jet milled (MC ONE, JETPHARMA SA, Switzerland) twice before the utilization in the preparation of the filament. The cumulative particle size distribution of milled DOM was D10 = 1.5 μm, D50 = 6.3 μm, and D90 = 14.7 μm measured by a laser diffractometer (Helos/Rodos, Sympatec GmbH, Germany). HPC (KlucelTM EXF) was a gift from Ashland (Shanghai, China). Propranolol hydrochloride (internal standard, IS) was supplied by NIFDC (Beijing, China). All the other reagents were of either high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or analytical grade.

Fabrication of filaments

Different ratios of DOM, BaSO4 and HPC were manually mixed together using a mortar and pestle before extruding in a twin-screw extruder (HAAKE MiniCTW, Thermo Scientific, Germany) equipped with a customized rod-shaped die (1.75 mm). The formulations and process parameters of filaments preparation were shown in Table S1. Only the filaments within the sizes of 1.75 ± 5 mm were further used for tablet printing.

Tablet design and 3D printing

The cylinder shaped tablets with different infill percentages (0%, 10%, 20% and 30%) and shell numbers (1, 2, 3 and 4) were prepared to investigate the floating capability of the tablets (Tables S2 and S3). The templates were designed by AutoCAD® 2014 (Autodesk Inc., USA) and fabricated with the previous HME prepared filaments using a desktop fused-deposition modeling 3D printer (Replicator 2X, MakerBot Inc., USA). The printing parameters were set as follows: extruder temperature: 210 °C; resolution: standard; platform temperature: 30 °C; travel speed: 90 mm/s; height of the layer: 0.2 mm; thickness of roof and floor: 0.8 mm; infill pattern: linear. Raft and Scotch Blue painter’s tape 50 mm (3 M, Shanghai, China) were applied to improve the adhesion of printing tablets to the building platform and removed after printing. The tablet height (H) and diameter (D) were measured by vernier caliper. The tablet weight (W) and the circular constant (π) were also used to calculate the tablet density (ρ) by the following equation (1). The formulation and physical parameters of DOM-FSR tablets were shown in Tables S2 and S3.

$$\rho =\frac{W}{{(\frac{D}{2})}^{2}\times \pi \times H}$$

Characterization of filaments and DOM-FSR tablets

The images of the filaments and floating tablets were obtained using a Sony NEX-5 camera equipped with a macro lens. The surface morphologies of samples were photographed with a Hitachi S-4800 SEM. DSC and TGA were used to characterize the thermo properties under pure nitrogen atmosphere through all the analysis. For DSC analysis, the sample of 8–10 mg was placed in an alumina pan with a lid and measured by a TA Q2000 DSC analyzer at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The percentage of crystallinity (POC) was calculated according to the equation (2)28. For TGA analysis, approximately 5 mg of samples were heated at 10 °C/min in an open aluminum pans using a TA Q500 TGA. FT-IR spectra were applied to record the interaction of DOM and HPC using a Nicolet IS10 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Thermo Electron Scientific Instruments LLC, USA) with a frequency range from 4000–650 cm−1. A Power X-ray diffractometer, Bruker D8 ADVANCE phaser with Lynxeye was applied to assess the physical form at a scanning rate of 6°/min in the 2θ range from 10° to 90°.

$${\rm{POC}}( \% )=\frac{{{\rm{\Delta }}{\rm{H}}}_{{\rm{s}}}}{{{\rm{\Delta }}{\rm{H}}}_{{\rm{DOM}}}\times {\rm{W}}\,}\times 100 \% $$

where ΔHs and ΔHDOM are the melting enthalpy of the test sample and pure DOM, respectively. W is the weight fraction of DOM in the samples.

Sample analysis by HPLC-UV

To determinate the drug content, a tablet or a filament section (approx.0.1 g) was cut into small pieces and placed in a 50 mL volumetric flask containing methanol. The flask was ultrasounded for 30 min to ensure the complete dissolution of DOM. The dissolved sample was then filtered through 0.22 μm nylon filters (Anpel, China) and the concentration of DOM was determined by HPLC-UV system (LC-20AD prominence series HPLC system, Shimadzu, Japan) with Labsolutions software. The validated HPLC analysis entailed injecting 20 μL of samples using mobile phase consisted of methanol (60%) and 0.5% ammonium acetate solution (40%), through a Thermo 5μm C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, Thermo, UK), maintained at 35 °C. The flow rate of mobile phase was 1.0 mL/min and the detection was performed at a wavelength of 285 nm. All the measurements were carried out in duplicate.

In vitro dissolution and floating study

The in vitro release rate of DOM from DOM-FSR tablets (n=6) was evaluated using a USP dissolution apparatus II machine (RC806D, TDTF, China). The Dom-FSR tablets were placed in 900 mL of 0.1 N HCl release medium at 37 ± 0.5 °C and agitated at 50 rpm. At the predetermined intervals, samples were drawn and analyzed using a HPLC-UV method with the same chromatographic conditions as the content assay. To take the floating image clearly, DOM-FSR tablets were taken from dissolution vessels at different times, placed in 15 mL vials with dissolution media, and taken photos immediately.

In vivo dissolution and floating study


The pharmacokinetics and X-ray imaging experiments were approved by the Medical Animal Ethics Committee of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine in accordance to the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. A total of 12 male 4-month-old New Zealand White rabbits weighting 1.7–2.5 kg were purchased from SLAC Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and acclimated for at least one week before use. All rabbits were housed in individual cages under controlled temperature of 21–23 °C with a regular 12 h of light-dark schedule. Food and tap water were provided ad libitum.

A single-dose two-period crossover pharmacokinetic study was conducted in eight healthy male New Zealand rabbits with a one-week washout period. After overnight fasting, a little low-calorie food was given before the experiment. The rabbits, weighing 1.8–2.3 kg, were randomly divided into two groups. One group was given the Dom-FSR tablets (Table S2, F8) containing 20 mg DOM and the other group was given two reference commercial DOM tablets (Motilium®, Xian-Janssen, China) with the same dose of DOM using a pet piller. The rabbits were given food 8 h after the administration of the tablets, but they had free access to water all the time. For the test and reference groups, blood samples were collected from the ear vein and placed in heparinized plastic centrifuge tubes immediately before and then 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after dosing. These samples were processed by centrifugation for 10 min at 4500 rpm. The plasma samples were stored at −20 °C until analysis.

For radiographic studies, 10% (w/w) barium sulfate was incorporated to make the DOM-FSR tablets opaque, considering the balance of buoyancy and X-ray image view effect29. After overnight fasting, three healthy New Zealand rabbits weighing 2.0–2.5 kg were fed with a small amount of low-calorie food and water. One hour later, one barium sulfate-labeled tablet (Table S2, F9) was given to every animal using a pet piller. After administration, the rabbits were fed with 15 mL of water. At different times (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h), the animals were kept in a standing position with a fixed distance from the X-ray source and radiographs were obtained with constant parameters. The rabbits were given 1.5 mL water every hour and had access to food 8 h after the tablet administration.

Plasma sample analysis by HPLC-FLD

A liquid-liquid extraction process and HPLC fluorometric detection method moderately optimized from literatures30, 31 were employed to analyze the plasma samples. 200 μL plasma was mixed with 20 μL IS solution (1.024 μg/mL propranolol hydrochloride methanol solution) and 100 μL 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution. After 1 min of vortex-mixing, 3 mL CH2Cl2 was added being followed by vortex-mixing for 5 min. After centrifugation at 4500 rpm for 5 min, the organic layer was transferred to a new tube to separate with debris. After the first time of extraction, another 3 mL CH2Cl2 was added and repeated extraction was made to increase the recovery of DOM. The combined organic layer was evaporated to dry under pure nitrogen at 40 °C. The residue was reconstituted with 200 μL of the mobile phase and vortexed for 10 min. After centrifugation for 5 min at 10000 rpm, a 50 μL of aliquot was injected into the HPLC system for analysis.

The HPLC analysis was performed on a Shimadzu LC-20AD prominence series liquid chromatography system equipped with a RF-10A spectrofluorometiric detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The detection wavelength was set at 282 nm for excitation and 328 nm for emission. The column was Kromasil 100-5 C18 (4.6 × 250 mm, i.d., 5 μm; AKZO NOBEL, Sweden) and maintained at 40 °C by a CTO-20AC column oven. A guard column Athena C18 (4.0 × 20 mm, i.d., 5 μm, CNW, Shanghai, China) was attached before the analytical column. The mobile phase was 0.02 M phosphate buffer (pH3.5)-acetonitrile (25:75, v/v) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The developed method was validated before the samples analysis. The linearity was obtained in the range of 10–1000 ng/mL with an r (correlation coefficient) value of 0.999 and the LLOQ was 1 ng/mL.

Pharmacokinetic data analysis

Data analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters was carried out using the software DAS 2.1.1. (Mathematical Pharmacology Professional Committee of China, Shanghai, China). Non-compartmental model was applied to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters. The student’s t-test was performed to determine the significance of difference between the pharmacokinetic parameters. The level of significance was defined as p value < 0.05 using the statistical software SPSS (version 22.0).


  1. 1.

    Davis, S. S. Formulation strategies for absorption windows. Drug. Discov. Today. 10, 249–257, doi:10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03351-3 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hoffman, A. et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of gastroretentive dosage forms. Int. J. Pharm. 277, 141–153, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.09.047 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pawar, V. K., Kansal, S., Asthana, S. & Chourasia, M. K. Industrial perspective of gastroretentive drug delivery systems: physicochemical, biopharmaceutical, technological and regulatory consideration. Expert. Opin. Drug. Deliv. 9, 551–565, doi:10.1517/17425247.2012.677431 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pawar, V. K. et al. Gastroretentive dosage forms: a review with special emphasis on floating drug delivery systems. Drug. Deliv. 18, 97–110, doi:10.3109/10717544.2010.520354 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lopes, C. M., Bettencourt, C., Rossi, A., Buttini, F. & Barata, P. Overview on gastroretentive drug delivery systems for improving drug bioavailability. Int. J. Pharm. 510, 144–158, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.016 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Reddymasu, S. C., Soykan, I. & McCallum, R. W. Domperidone: review of pharmacology and clinical applications in gastroenterology. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 102, 2036–2045, doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01255.x (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nagarsenker, M. S., Garad, S. D. & Ramprakash, G. Design, optimization and evaluation of domperidone coevaporates. J. Control. Release. 63, 31–39, doi:10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00177-7 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Prajapati, S. T., Patel, L. D. & Patel, D. M. Studies on formulation and in vitro evaluation of floating matrix tablets of domperidone. Indian. J. Pharm. Sci. 71, 19–23, doi:10.4103/0250-474X.51944 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Prajapati, S. T., Patel, L. D. & Patel, D. M. Gastric floating matrix tablets: design and optimization using combination of polymers. Acta. Pharm. 58, 221–229, doi:10.2478/v10007-008-0006-3 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Norman, J., Madurawe, R. D., Moore, C. M., Khan, M. A. & Khairuzzaman, A. A new chapter in pharmaceutical manufacturing: 3D-printed drug products. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 108, 39–50, doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.001 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jonathan, G. & Karim, A. 3D printing in pharmaceutics: A new tool for designing customized drug delivery systems. Int. J.Pharm. 499, 376–394, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.071 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sandler, N. & Preis, M. Printed Drug-Delivery Systems for Improved Patient Treatment. Trends. Pharmacol. Sci. 37, 1070–1080, doi:10.1016/ (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    MacDonald, E. & Wicker, R. Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality. Science 353, aaf2093–aaf2093, doi:10.1126/science.aaf2093 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Goyanes, A., Buanz, A. B., Basit, A. W. & Gaisford, S. Fused-filament 3D printing (3DP) for fabrication of tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 476, 88–92, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.044 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Melocchi, A. et al. Hot-melt extruded filaments based on pharmaceutical grade polymers for 3D printing by fused deposition modeling. Int. J. Pharm. 509, 255–263, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.036 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Melocchi, A. et al. 3D printing by fused deposition modeling (FDM) of a swellable/erodible capsular device for oral pulsatile release of drugs. J. Drug. Deliv. Sci.Tec. 30, 360–367, doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2015.07.016 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pietrzak, K., Isreb, A. & Alhnan, M. A. A flexible-dose dispenser for immediate and extended release 3D printed tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 96, 380–387, doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.07.027 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sadia, M. et al. Adaptation of pharmaceutical excipients to FDM 3D printing for the fabrication of patient-tailored immediate release tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 513, 659–668, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.050 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Goyanes, A. et al. Fabrication of controlled-release budesonide tablets via desktop (FDM) 3D printing. Int. J. Pharm. 496, 414–420, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.039 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Alhijjaj, M., Belton, P. & Qi, S. An investigation into the use of polymer blends to improve the printability of and regulate drug release from pharmaceutical solid dispersions prepared via fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 108, 111–125, doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.08.016 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhang, J., Feng, X., Patil, H., Tiwari, R. V. & Repka, M. A. Coupling 3D Printing with Hot-Melt Extrusion to Produce Controlled-Release Tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 519, 186–197, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.12.049 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Okwuosa, T. C. et al. A Lower Temperature FDM 3D Printing for the Manufacture of Patient-Specific Immediate Release Tablets. Pharm. Res. 33, 2704–2712, doi:10.1007/s11095-016-1995-0 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Goyanes, A., Det-Amornrat, U., Wang, J., Basit, A. W. & Gaisford, S. 3D scanning and 3D printing as innovative technologies for fabricating personalized topical drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release. 234, 41–48, doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.034 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kadivar, A. et al. Formulation and in vitro, in vivo evaluation of effervescent floating sustained-release imatinib mesylate tablet. PloS. One. 10, e0126874, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126874 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Goyanes, A., Buanz, A. B., Hatton, G. B., Gaisford, S. & Basit, A. W. 3D printing of modified-release aminosalicylate (4-ASA and 5-ASA) tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 89, 157–162, doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.12.003 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Abuhelwa, A. Y., Williams, D. B., Upton, R. N. & Foster, D. J. Food, gastrointestinal pH, and models of oral drug absorption. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 112, 234–248, doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.11.034 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    DrugBank. Available from: (2017).

  28. 28.

    Li, X. et al. Preparation and characterization of azithromycin–Aerosil 200 solid dispersions with enhanced physical stability. Int. J. Pharm. 486, 175–184, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.03.029 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dios, P. et al. Influence of barium sulfate X-ray imaging contrast material on properties of floating drug delivery tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 95, 46–53, doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2016.09.034 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yamamoto, K., Hagino, M., Kotaki, H. & Iga, T. Quantitative determination of domperidone in rat plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. B. 720, 251–255, doi:10.1016/S0378-4347(98)00339-9 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yoshizato, T., Tsutsumi, K., Kotegawa, T., Imai, H. & Nakano, S. Determination of domperidone in human plasma using high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection for clinical application. J. Chromatogr. B. 961, 86–90, doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.05.004 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by grants from the Major Projects for Drug Innovation and Development from National Science and Technology of China (2012ZX09304004), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81473409), and Start-up Grant of Fudan University (EZF301512).

Author information




X.C., T.T. and X.X. conceived and designed the experiments; X.C., H.C., J.Y. and J.L. prepared the tablets; X.C., H.C. and Y.Z. performed the in vitro evaluation; X.C., H.C., X.W. and J.Y. performed the in vivo evaluation; X.C. and W.C. performed data analysis; X.C. and X.X. wrote the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tao Tao or Xiaoqiang Xiang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chai, X., Chai, H., Wang, X. et al. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D Printed Tablets for Intragastric Floating Delivery of Domperidone. Sci Rep 7, 2829 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing