Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Immune signatures of pathogenesis in the peritoneal compartment during early infection of sheep with Fasciola hepatica

Abstract

Immune signatures of sheep acutely-infected with Fasciola hepatica, an important pathogen of livestock and humans were analysed within the peritoneal compartment to investigate early infection. Within the peritoneum, F. hepatica antibodies coincided with an intense innate and adaptive cellular immune response, with infiltrating leukocytes and a marked eosinophilia (49%). However, while cytokine qPCR analysis revealed IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-23 and TGFβ were elevated, these were not statistically different at 18 days post-infection compared to uninfected animals indicating that the immune response is muted and not yet skewed to a Th2 type response that is associated with chronic disease. Proteomic analysis of the peritoneal fluid identified infection-related proteins, including several structural proteins derived from the liver extracellular matrix, connective tissue and epithelium, and proteins related to the immune system. Periostin and vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM-1), molecules that mediate leukocyte infiltration and are associated with inflammatory disorders involving marked eosinophilia (e.g. asthma), were particularly elevated in the peritoneum. Immuno-histochemical studies indicated that the source of periostin and VCAM-1 was the inflamed sheep liver tissue. This study has revealed previously unknown aspects of the immunology and pathogenesis associated with acute fascioliasis in the peritoneum and liver.

Introduction

Fasciolosis is a disease of ruminants caused by the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica, and results in worldwide economic losses of greater than US $3 billion per annum1,2,3. It is also recognised by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as an important zoonosis; global infections are estimated between 2 and 17 million, with 180 million people at risk of infection4,5,6. The economic losses in ruminants are associated with the liver damage caused by parasites migrating through the definitive hosts resulting in poor food conversion, impaired fertility and reduced wool and milk production7,8,9,10,11.

Parasite migration begins following the ingestion of the infective encysted stage, the metacercariae, that excyst within the intestine as newly excysted juveniles (NEJs). The NEJs traverse the intestinal wall into the peritoneal cavity, where they continue to migrate through the liver capsule into the liver parenchyma. Those parasites that reach the liver, normally between four and six days post-infection, cause extensive tissue damage and haemorrhaging in the liver parenchyma resulting in the hepatic pathogenesis associated with acute fasciolosis12. F. hepatica secretes molecules that modulate the host immune response and induce the development of a Th2 response and concomitant inhibition of protective pro-inflammatory responses as the disease progresses to chronicity12, 13. This polarisation of the immune responses is sufficiently potent to influence the host’s susceptibility to co-infections with bacterial pathogens13,14,15,16,17,18,19.

Acute fasciolosis is especially problematic in sheep that die suddenly from haemorrhage and liver damage, particularly when large numbers of migrating immature flukes enter the liver; according to the National Animal Disease Information Services (NADIS) it is estimated that up to 10% of sheep at risk of infection in the UK will die of acute disease20. Clinical signs of infection include anaemia, dyspnoea, ascites and abdominal pain, which are also associated with sub-acute disease. Parasite populations resistant to the frontline anthelminthic used to treat acute fasciolosis, triclabendazole, are becoming more prevalent leaving farmers with no means of controlling acute infection21.

Studies have shown that as the parasite migrates through the intestinal epithelium clinical signs are not evident, although an immunological response is induced, as illustrated by the large number of immune cells infiltrating into the peritoneal cavity22, 23. Since the parasite migrates from the intestine to the liver via the peritoneum we considered that investigation of the peritoneal compartment of infected animals may provide new information of the early immune response in this compartment that can be exploited for vaccine development. At the same time, the data could also identify important host-specific proteins related to infection.

Proteomic analysis of the host response to F. hepatica has been carried out on host bile and serum24, 25, with the analysis of bile representing the chronic stages of infection when the adult parasites have migrated through the liver to the bile ducts24 and the serum representing the systemic response25. However, to date, the use of proteomics tools for the analysis of peritoneal fluid has only been reported in patients with uremia, endometriosis, ovarian cancer and following cases of peritoneal dialysis26,27,28,29, which has facilitated the development of biomarkers for these respective diseases/pathologies.

In the present study, we examined the changes that occur within the peritoneal compartment of sheep during the first 18 days of infection (dpi) with F. hepatica. This is the first differential proteomic analysis of peritoneal fluid comparing uninfected and infected sheep. Our data reveal immune signatures within the peritoneum, with the identification of molecular markers of significant parasite-induced liver pathogenesis. These molecular markers may be useful for vaccine development studies in the future, particularly in relation to defining correlates of protective immune responses.

Results

Early liver pathology caused by the migration of immature Fasciola hepatica

No gross changes on either the diaphragmatic or visceral surface (Fig. 1A) were observed for the uninfected sheep. Liver from infected sheep (18 dpi) showed white/yellow foci and tortuous tracts ranging from 0.2–1.5 cm length located on the liver surface, mainly on the diaphragmatic aspect of the left lobe, consistent with F. hepatica infection (Fig. 1C). For some of the sheep, spots or small red tracts due to hyperaemia and haemorrhage could be observed.

Figure 1
figure1

Comparison of gross and microscopical liver pathology between uninfected (A and B) and infected (C and D) animals. (A) Liver showing no apparent gross pathology. (B) HE stained liver microphotograph showing centrilubular veins (c) and portal spaces (p) with blood vessels and bile ducts and absence of inflammatory infiltrate (Magnification x400). (C) Liver showing white tortuous tracts caused by F. hepatica. (D) HE stained liver microphotograph displaying acute small necrotic foci without inflammatory infiltrate (n), acute necrotic foci with presence of abundant necrotic inflammatory cells (ne) and severe inflammatory infiltrate in adjacent portal spaces (Magnification x400).

At the microscopic level, histopathology revealed no hepatic damage in the uninfected sheep (Fig. 1B). In the infected animals, necrotic foci and necrotic tortuous tracts within the hepatic parenchyma, mainly involving sub-capsular areas were observed (Fig. 1D). Examination of the acute necrotic foci revealed a moderate inflammatory infiltrate, with a predominant infiltration of eosinophils and minimal infiltration of neutrophils (<1–2%), and peripheral focal haemorrhages. Portal spaces adjacent to necrotic foci showed severe inflammatory infiltrate suggesting that the route of the infiltrating inflammatory cells was through the portal vessels.

Liver enzyme analysis of the infected animals was consistent with the stage of liver fluke infection of the liver migrating parasites; elevated levels of glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) indicative of liver disease were observed, which were statistically significant when compared to the uninfected animals, based on normalised data (P value < 0.01). Furthermore, very low levels of gamma glutamyl-transferase (GGT), which is typically used as an indicator of chronic infection, were observed in both infected and non-infected groups (Fig. 2). Although the values observed for GLDH were significantly different between the groups, this was only observed when the data was normalised and large variation was observed between the animals suggesting that these serum enzymes may not be reliable markers for fasciolosis in sheep in the first 18 dpi. Analysis of liver enzymes within the peritoneal fluid found lower levels of GLDH compared to serum and no significant differences between the uninfected and infected animals (data not shown). GLDH originates from hepatocytes located in the centrilobular area of the liver that express high levels of this enzyme and directly release it into the circulation making it more readily detected in serum30.

Figure 2
figure2

Liver enzyme profile. Serum from uninfected (UI) and infected (I) sheep, representing the mean (n = 5) of each group ± standard deviation were analysed for a variety of liver enzymes. The normalised data is shown by a dot plot on a log scale. Prot: total protein (g/l); Alb: albumin (g/l); Glob: globulin (g/l); GGT: gamma glutamyl-transferase (units/l) and GLDH: glutamate dehydrogenase (units/l). *P value = 0.01.

Immune signatures within the peritoneal compartment during acute F. hepatica infection

Using a combination of western blot and ELISA we evaluated the humoral immune response against F. hepatica in the peritoneal fluid of uninfected and infected animals (Fig. 3A,B). IgG antibodies against the recombinant F. hepatica antigen FhCL1 were markedly increased in the peritoneal fluid of infected sheep confirming F. hepatica infection (P value < 0.01). No FhCL1-specific antibodies were detected in uninfected sheep. This is the first report of the F. hepatica ELISA utilising FhCL1 being used for peritoneal fluid.

Figure 3
figure3

Peritoneal fluid humoral and cellular analysis. (A) Detection of F. hepatica cathepsin L1 (FhCL1) specific antibodies in peritoneal fluid by immunoblotting. Lane 1: FhCL1 positive control; Lane 2: peritoneal fluid from the uninfected pool (UI_PF); Lane 3: peritoneal fluid from the infected pool (I_PF). (B) IgG level response in peritoneal fluid against F. hepatica cathepsin L1 (FhCL1). 1: FhCL1 positive control; 2: uninfected (UI_PF); 3: infected (I_PF). (C) Total mean cell count per ml in the peritoneal fluid from the uninfected (UI) and infected (I) groups (n = 5; ± standard deviation is represented). (D) Mean differential cell count showing the percentages of macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils in the peritoneal fluid of uninfected and infected sheep (n = 5; ± standard deviation is represented). (E) Mean differential cell count of macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils in the peritoneal fluid of uninfected and infected sheep (n = 5; ± standard deviation) represented by cell number. *P value < 0.05; **P value < 0.01.

Analysis of the leukocyte profile found within the peritoneum revealed that the humoral response against F. hepatica coincides with a cellular immune response as observed by the statistically significant rise in total leukocyte number within the peritoneal fluid, from a mean value of 6 × 106 ± 2.6 (SD) cells per ml in the uninfected animals to a mean value of 25 × 106 ± 15.6 (SD) cells per ml (P value < 0.05; Fig. 3C). In addition, the populations of individual cell types were dramatically altered; most notably, with 49% of the cell population comprised of eosinophils in the infected sheep compared to 2% in the uninfected sheep, which represented a 94-fold increase in the actual number of eosinophils at 18 dpi compared to uninfected sheep (P value < 0.01). Whilst the proportion of macrophages and lymphocytes in the total cell counts were reduced following infection (Fig. 3D), due to the 4-fold increase in total cell count, the actual cell numbers increased 2-fold and 2.5-fold, respectively (Fig. 3E). There was also no evidence of mast cells or basophils within the cellular infiltrates, consistent with other studies in sheep31.

An extensive panel of ovine cytokines related to parasite infection were selected for qPCR analysis of the transcripts isolated from total peritoneal cells. Some primers were obtained from the literature, while others were designed as part of this study using available ovine cytokine gene sequences (Table 1). Cytokines IL-1, IL-4 and IL-5, and the chemokine Eotaxin were not detected in our samples from infected and non-infected animals. Five cytokines (IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-23 and TGF-β) were shown to be more highly transcribed by the peritoneal cells from infected animals compared to cells taken from uninfected animals, relative to three housekeeping genes, β-actin, beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Fig. 4). These results were not shown to be statistically significant due to the high variability between the animals.

Table 1 Primers for quantitative PCR (qPCR) cytokine analysis.
Figure 4
figure4

Analysis of relative quantitative cytokine gene expression within the cells of the peritoneal fluid, represented by normalized relative fold expression on log10 scale. Immune marker transcript abundance of the infected group was normalised against the abundance of the respective transcripts in the uninfected group. Transcript abundance of the uninfected group (not shown on graph) is equal to 1. Data represents mean + SEM of fold changes in target transcript abundance relative to three house-keeping genes: β-actin, B2M and GAPDH. Each bar represents data from five biological replicates; statistical analyses were performed using One Way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc tests, comparing the data from the uninfected with infected samples, which showed no statistical differences based on animal variation within each group.

ECM proteins associated with infection and liver pathology

Comparative analysis of the peritoneal fluid recovered from the uninfected and infected sheep identified a total of 176 proteins based on at least two unique peptides and the presence in both biological samples from experimental sheep trials carried out in Spain and the UK, which were classified according to putative function (Supplementary Table 1; Supplementary Fig. 1). Several structural proteins were identified related to the liver extracellular matrix (ECM), connective tissue and epithelium, including collagen VI structural unit proteins, fibronectin and fibrocystin, as well as proteins related to the immune system including immunoglobulins and components of the complement system (Fig. 5). Of particular note were the ECM-related proteins that showed the highest fold change differences in the infected animals when compared with the uninfected animals, namely, periostin (fold change 5.8) and vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM-1; fold change 3) (Fig. 5B). Periostin is associated with several inflammatory disorders and in particular, has been shown to be a systemic biomarker of airway eosinophilia in asthmatic patients being related with eosinophilic airway inflammation32, 33. VCAM-1, a leukocyte adhesion molecule expressed by cytokine-activated endothelial cells in culture, mediates mononuclear leukocyte infiltration in vessels and interstitium34. To confirm the presence of these proteins within the liver, we used an immunohistochemistry approach on sections of liver from the uninfected and infected sheep (Fig. 6). Periostin was found to be confined to the cytoplasm of hepatocytes and localised in the liver parenchyma in both the uninfected and infected animals (Fig. 6B,E and H, respectively). Interestingly, stronger periostin-related staining was observed in the hepatocytes surrounding the necrotic foci of infected animals. Furthermore, a moderate number of inflammatory cells were positive in the inner area of the acute necrotic foci and within the acute inflammatory infiltrate associated with the portal space (Fig. 6E and H). VCAM-1 was detected in the liver from infected animals, mostly in the inflammatory cells showing a reticular pattern; morphology compatible with dendritic cells within sites of acute inflammation. No VCAM-1 positive cells were found within the acute necrotic foci (Fig. 6F and I), compared with the very few positive cells with macrophage morphology localised in the portal spaces of the uninfected animals (Fig. 6C). Surprisingly, no VCAM-1 positive endothelial cells were detected in either the uninfected or infected animals.

Figure 5
figure5

Expression profile of proteins identified within the peritoneal fluid relating to (A) blood, coagulation and the immune system, (B) cell cycle and cell adhesion, (C) collagen and cytoskeletal structure. The fold change, represented on a log 2 scale, was calculated based on the differences in protein concentration (emPAI values) between the uninfected and infected peritoneal fluid samples.

Figure 6
figure6

Immuno-labelling potential biomarkers of liver damage. Liver sections from uninfected (A,B,C) and infected sheep (D,E,F,H,I) were probed with periostin rabbit anti-mouse polyclonal antibody (B,E and H) and Vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM-1) rabbit anti-rat, mouse, human monoclonal antibody (C,F and I). Rabbit pre-immune serum (A and D) and staining using the goat anti-rabbit biotinylated secondary antibody only (G) were used as negative controls. Panels H and I are high powered images of panels E and F representing periostin and VCAM-1 staining, respectively. Periostin reactivity in the uninfected sheep (B) is found in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes, particularly in perilobular areas (arrows), whereas in the infected sheep (E and H) strong reactivity is found in hepatocytes (arrows) adjacent to inflammatory infiltrates (if) surrounding necrotic foci and in inflammatory cells (arrow heads). VCAM-1 is weakly expressed in the uninfected sheep (C) but strongly expressed in acute infection (F and I) particularly in the inflammatory infiltrates (if) showing a reticular pattern (arrow heads). ne: acute necrotic foci; if: inflammatory infiltrate; p: portal space. Scale bars represent 100 µm (AG) and 50 µm (H and I).

Discussion

The migration of F. hepatica NEJ from the intestine to the liver is a critical step in the parasites’ establishment of infection in the mammalian host. Entry of the liver is accompanied by the development of the parasite gut, metabolic alterations, rapid growth and a marked regulation of expression of >8000 genes35. From the hosts’ point of view, penetration and migration through the liver provokes severe pathogenesis as a result of intense inflammatory immune responses to fluke secretory antigens (including many proteases) and tissue damage. Prevention of tissue damage and inflammation is the primary aim of disease control; this makes the flukicide triclabendazole very attractive as a treatment since it is the only drug effective against the early migratory stages of the parasite. The spread of triclabendazole-resistant parasites, however, has left farmers without a means to control early and acute fasciolosis and consequently the disease has become increasingly prevalent in Europe and elsewhere12, 21, 36. Our focus is to develop an effective vaccine against F. hepatica that is directed at the early migratory stages to prevent their penetration into, and migration within, the liver. For this, we need to further understand the immune response of the host to these early invasive stages, particularly in the vicinity of their migration i.e. the peritoneal cavity.

The immunological profile in the peritoneum during early stages of fasciolosis reflects that specific immune signatures can be identified within the ovine peritoneal compartment. Analysis of the peritoneal fluid showed a clear antibody response characterised by the presence of anti-FhCL1 (a secreted protease) antibodies. Furthermore, there was intense cellular activity of both innate (macrophages, eosinophils) and adaptive (lymphocytes) immune cells. Most notable was the very marked eosinophilia (49% of immune cells). Eosinophilia is also observed within the peritoneum during the early stages of infection in rats37, and was observed by both histocytochemical studies22, 23, 38 and transcriptome analysis of F. hepatica-infected sheep liver39, 40. Marked eosinophilia is typical of helminth infections that drive Th2-dominant immune responses and in some cases, for example primary filarial infections41 and schistosomiasis42, 43, is associated with significant immune protection. However, the role of these cells in regulating immune responses to infection and their direct anti-parasite function is being heavily debated. Studies using eosinophil deficient mice infected with Schistosoma mansoni and Nippostrongylus brasiliensis have shown that the high levels of eosinophils may play a role in tissue remodelling rather than as agents of parasite damage (reviewed by44). Similarly Ohnmacht and colleagues45 suggest that the peritoneal cavity is a reservoir for eosinophils during helminth infection. Given the lack of resistance observed in sheep (reviewed by36) and our observations of marked eosinophilia within the peritoneum we would conclude they are not protective in primary responses in this species. Coupled with the lack of eosinophil degranulation proteins observed within the peritoneal fluid and the fact that the majority of the F. hepatica parasites at 18 dpi are present within the liver, this implies that the peritoneal cavity acts as a reservoir for non-activated eosinophils that disseminate from here to other compartments.

F. hepatica infection studies in mice46, 47 and ruminants48,49,50,51 show that the immune response is dominated by a Th2-type response. However, most studies in ruminants have examined infections at patent or chronic stages when significant parasite development and host tissue damaged has occurred48, 49, 51. Our present study is the first to investigate early immune responses in the peritoneum compartment at a very early stage of infection. Our cytokine analysis of the mixed population of peritoneal cells by qPCR detected increased transcription of cytokines IL-12 and IL-23 that are associated with pro-inflammatory processes. Increased gene transcription of TGF-β and IL-10 was also observed in the infected animals, with TGF-β being implied in anti-inflammatory responses inducing fibrosis and tissue regeneration. TGF-β and IL-10 also play a central role in minimizing pathology and enhancing tissue repair during helminth infections52, 53. Interestingly, we did not observe IL-4, but perhaps transcription of this cytokine is down-regulated by TGF-β as seen in N. brasiliensis infections in mice whereby Treg–derived TGF-β counterbalanced IL-4 expression54. Similarly, in F. hepatica-infected mice only low levels of IL-4 transcription can be detected at 14 days post infection46. Overall, our data imply that, the immune responses initiated within this mixed population of cells, comprised of 20% lymphocytes, prior to 18 days of F. hepatica infection in sheep is weak and not differentiated to a Th2 type typical of chronic infection. The potent skewing towards a Th2 response appears only to occur after the parasite has penetrated the liver parenchyma and caused significant tissue damage (12; Cwiklinski et al., unpublished).

To further describe the immuno-pathological responses to F. hepatica infection and complement previous studies of the peritoneal compartment55,56,57, we employed a novel approach to identify the proteins present within sheep peritoneal fluid during early F. hepatica infection using proteomics. This was performed by electrophoretically separating the proteins under denaturing conditions and then slicing fractions above and below the predominant host proteins (circa 67 kDa albumin; Supplementary Figure 1). While we likely missed proteins at similar migration to albumin we were able to identify 176 peritoneal fluid proteins. This data provides the first step to characterising the proteins that may play an important role in immunopathology and/or can act as biomarkers of infection. This study also reflects analysis of the host response following infection with different F. hepatica isolates, a UK isolate (South Gloucester) and an Italian isolate. Genetic analysis of these isolates has yet to be carried out, though recent studies have shown that F. hepatica is highly polymorphic and isolates within the UK show high levels of genetic diversity35, 58, indicating that these two isolates could exhibit differences. From the host’s point of view, comparative analysis of our proteomic data revealed a strong positive correlation between the biological replicates of each time-point (uninfected: r = 0.8799, P < 0.0001; infected: r = 0.7693, P < 0.0001), with the same proteins identified at comparable levels, based on emPAI values. As this study focussed on the early stages of infection, the number of parasites responsible for the infection cannot be quantified, so inferences of the virulence/pathogenicity of these isolates were not made as part of this study. However, based on similar pathology and immune responses across both experiments, these results indicate that despite potential genetic diversity, during the early stages of infection, the host response is comparable to each isolate.

The protein periostin is of particular interest because not only was it dramatically increased in the peritoneal fluid of infected animals it was also particularly abundant in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes surrounding the necrotic foci, within inflammatory cells of the acute necrotic foci and within the acute inflammatory infiltrate associated with the portal space. As several cell types express periostin, including epithelial cells, fibroblasts (peritoneal and liver) and hepatocytes59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68, the source of periostin within the peritoneal fluid may be damaged liver tissues. Alternatively, the protein could be secreted by the peritoneal eosinophils that predominate in the cavity. Periostin has been shown to be involved in cellular dedifferentiation, ECM deposition and angiogenesis33, 63, 64, and within the liver where it plays a role in wound repair and tissue remodelling it co-localises with and binds to the ECM proteins fibronectin, tenascin C and fibrillar collagen (I, II, V) to form a connective tissue structure65. As well as being involved in fibrosis, periostin could also play a role in promoting eosinophil recruitment and migration within the ECM as observed in asthmatic studies32, 66,67,68. It has been suggested that soluble periostin may drive adhesion of eosinophils to ECM fibronectin increasing their survival68. Interestingly, expression of periostin is strongly associated with Th2-mediated pathologies69,70,71 and has been proposed as a biomarker for Th2-driven/eosinophilic inflammation66. For example, elevated levels of periostin can be detected in the serum of patients with acute or chronic hepatitis72.

The abundance of the adhesion protein VCAM-1 within the infected peritoneal cavity was supported by immunohistochemistry analysis that showed its enhanced expression in liver tissue of infected sheep compared to non-infected animals. This is consistent with other studies showing an increase in VCAM-1 expression associated with chronic liver and biliary diseases73. As observed in this study, VCAM-1 expression is low in resting, undamaged cells but during liver inflammation its expression increases, and is believed to be important for recruitment of monocytes and lymphocytes74,75,76. Cannistra et al.77 showed that functional VCAM-1 is expressed on activated mesothelial cells and may play a role in the distal arm of leukocyte trafficking to the abdominal cavity. Intestinal epithelial cells are also capable of expressing VCAM-1 during mucosal inflammation78, which could be released into the peritoneum following migration of the NEJs across the intestine.

We identified several components of the complement system (C1-C9) within our proteomic data. In particular, C1 g and s subcomponents and C3, together with the C4b binding protein were shown to be increased at 18 dpi, with C3 being statistically upregulated (P value = 0.0029). C3 is the parent protein of C3a, which has shown to be an eosinophil chemo-attractant79 and therefore the proteolytic cleavage of this protein may be associated with the increase in peritoneal eosinophils we observed. The importance of the complement cascade system during F. hepatica infection is further highlighted by liver transcriptome analysis performed by Alvarez-Rojas and colleagues39 that reported the upregulation of genes related to the complement system two weeks post infection, particularly the C4b binding protein. In vitro studies have shown that complement activation on the surface of juvenile stages of S. mansoni can mediate parasite killing80, 81. While studies have shown that parasites, including F. hepatica, are able to inhibit both the classical and alternative complement pathways as part of their survival strategies82, 83, the possible interaction between the complement cascade and F. hepatica NEJs warrants further investigation.

Our proteomic analysis also detected components of the liver ECM within the peritoneal fluid that are likely associated with the liver damage caused by the digestive activity of the migrating parasites. Collagen VI was particularly abundant, perhaps not surprisingly as it is found throughout the connective tissue, forming branching networks that bind to other ECM proteins. This networking-forming collagen increases during liver fibrosis, and an increase of its soluble form in the circulation of patients with chronic liver disease is often seen as a marker for tissue damage and hepatic fibrosis84,85,86,87. Collagen VI gene expression was also found to be upregulated in 8-week post F. hepatica infection sheep livers by Alvarez-Rojas and colleagues39, indicating its role in liver re-modelling following parasite infection.

Another early marker of liver damage is the increased expression and deposition of the adhesion protein fibronectin88,89,90, which is actively secreted by hepatic stellate cells in response to liver injury72. We observed increased levels of fibronectin within the peritoneal fluid, which together with collagen VI, may be released from the liver as the NEJ actively migrates through the connective tissue within the liver, rather than penetrating through the fibrillary collagen structures (collagen I, III & V) at this early stage.

The ability to uncover host-parasite interactions can now be complemented through the availability of extensive bioinformatic datasets for both F. hepatica 35, 91,92,93 and various definitive hosts of this parasite, including the bovine and ovine genomes94,95,96. Our particular study was made possible through the availability of the most recent Ovis aries genome96. In addition, studies analysing host-specific responses using transcriptomics are now being carried out40, 41, 97, 98. A recent study by Alvarez-Rojas and colleagues39 exploring the livers of F. hepatica infected sheep highlighted the transcriptomic changes observed within the liver eight weeks post infection, including several upregulated genes linked to fibrosis (tgf-β related genes, calponin, transgelins and osteopontin) and markers of a T-cell response (BCL6, CD86, IL1R2, IL18BP, IL27RA, TGFβ and TNF). Osteopontin together with periostin, has been shown to mediate chronic rhinosinusitis inflammation by inducing a proliferative response of the ECM99. As fibrosis typically occurs four weeks post infection, periostin may be facilitating liver re-modelling without inducing fibrosis prior to the induction of other fibrosis-associated proteins, as has been observed in myocardial tissue100, 101. We observed no IFNγ expression at 18 dpi, which may be connected to IL18BP expression, a natural inhibitor of IFNγ102; a marker that requires further investigation. Although, the upregulation of TGFβ is consistent with our study, the remaining markers found to be upregulated at eight week post-infection are different, reflecting the different tissue/cells used for analysis and that the immune response profile changes during the course of infection.

Our study focussing at early infection in the peritoneum compartment has identified immune signatures associated with early fasciolosis. Given that we have shown here that serum levels of GLDH and GGT are not reliable markers of liver damage prior to 18 dpi, and that immune responses have not yet differentiated, this study has identified new molecules associated with early F. hepatica infection at this stage. These biological markers may be useful in future diagnostics and also in vaccine development studies to define correlates of protective immune responses.

Methods

Ethical statement

All animal work carried out in Spain was approved by the Bioethical Committee of the University of Cordoba (1118) and was carried out according to the Directive 2010/63/EU and Spanish (Ley 6/2013) directives for animal experimentation. Experimental procedures at the Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI; UK) were carried out under license from the Department of Health, Social Services and Public by the Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (License No. PPL 2771), after ethical review by the AFBI Animal Ethics Committee.

Sheep infections

Trial one: Ten 8-month-old male Merino-breed sheep (Spain) were allocated in two groups; uninfected (n = 5) and infected (n = 5). The infected group was orally infected with 150 F. hepatica metacercariae (South Gloucester isolate; Ridgeway Research Ltd) administered in gelatine capsules with a dosing gun. Animals were killed at 18 days post-infection (dpi) by intravenous injection of thiobarbital. At necropsy, the visceral and diaphragmatic aspects of the liver were photographed for gross evaluation. Tissue samples from the left and right hepatic lobes were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin wax. For histopathology, 4 µm paraffin wax liver sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE).

Trial two: Ten 6 month-old male Dorset cross sheep (UK) were allocated in two groups; uninfected group (n = 5) and infected group (n = 5). The infected group was orally infected with 150 F. hepatica metacercariae (Italian isolate: Ridgeway Research Ltd) administered in water. Animals were euthanised at 18 dpi by captive bolt. At necropsy, the visceral and diaphragmatic aspects of the liver were photographed for gross evaluation.

Recovery of peritoneal fluid

Peritoneal washing was conducted as previously described by Zafra et al.22, 23. The recovered peritoneal fluid was centrifuged at 430 × g for 5 min and the supernatant and cell pellet retained. The cell pellet was re-suspended in 1 ml DPBS and erythrocyte contamination removed using an erythrolysis buffer (155 mM Ammonium chloride, 10 mM Potassium bicarbonate, 0.1 mM EDTA). Cell viability and total cell count was assayed by trypan blue staining. Cell smears stained using panoptic stain for the differential cell counts were also performed using Vectabond-treated slides to determine the percentage of macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils within the cell pellet. This was calculated as a percentage of 100 cells, using differential nucleus and cytoplasm colour granule morphology to determine cell type.

The peritoneal fluid supernatant was centrifuged as follows, discarding any recovered pellet at each step: (1) 1720 × g for 10 min; (2) 25,000 × g for 30 min. Samples of the peritoneal fluid supernatants was concentrated (15-fold) by centrifugation in an Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter unit (4000 × g at 4 °C), followed by a final centrifugation at 21,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. Equal protein concentrations (20 µg) from the concentrated peritoneal fluid supernatants were taken from the five animals of both the uninfected and infected groups, which were pooled for proteomic analysis.

Detection of anti-Fasciola hepatica cathepsin L1 (rFhCL1) antibodies in the peritoneal fluid by ELISA

Flat-bottom 96 well microtitre plates (Nunc MaxiSorp) were coated with 0.5 μg/ml of FhCL1 antigen and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After 3 washes with PBS 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST; pH 7.4), 200 μl/well of blocking buffer (5% skimmed-milk powder diluted in PBST) was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature (RT). After washing 3 times, 100 μl of the rabbit anti-FhCL1103 and concentrated peritoneal fluid samples diluted 1:6400 in PBST were added to the microtitre plates in triplicate and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing 4 times, the plate was incubated with 100 μl/well of 1:10,000 polyclonal donkey anti-sheep IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Novex) for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing 5 times, 100 μl TMB substrate (3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine Liquid Substrate Supersensitive) was added to each well. Following 15 min incubation the reaction was stopped with the addition of 100 μl 2 M sulphuric acid. A peritoneal fluid sample was considered to be positive when the OD-value, determined at a wavelength of 450 nm, was greater than the OD mean of peritoneal fluid samples from the uninfected group plus 2 standard deviations.

Detection of Fasciola hepatica cathepsin L1 (rFhCL1) specific antibodies in peritoneal fluid by immunoblotting

SDS-PAGE was performed using 4–12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels and 5 μg of recombinant FhCL1 in 50 µl of NuPAGE LDS sample buffer, followed by protein transfer to a nitrocellulose membrane (0.2 μm pore size). The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated in blocking buffer (5% skimmed-milk powder in TBST; 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 1% Tween20, pH 7.0) for 1 h at RT. The membranes were probed overnight at RT with a pool of concentrated peritoneal fluid from the uninfected and infected groups diluted 1:1000 in TBST or as a positive control an anti-FhCL1 antibody103 diluted 1:1000 in TBST. Following 3 × 10 min washes in TBST, the membranes were probed with an alkaline phosphatase conjugated polyclonal donkey anti-sheep IgG antibody (Sigma) diluted 1:5000 for 1 h at RT, followed by 3 × 10 min washes in TBST. Immuno-reactive bands were visualised using NBT/BCIP (Sigma).

Serum levels of liver enzymes

Analysis of liver enzymes within the plasma of all animals was carried out for the following parameters: total protein, albumin, globulin, gamma glutamyl-transferase (GGT) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH).

Quantification of the cytokine expression in peritoneal cells by quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Messenger RNA (mRNA) was extracted from the peritoneal cells (3 × 106 cells) using QIAzol (Qiagen) followed by DNase treatment. First strand cDNA was synthesised using Superscript™ II RNase H-Reverse Transcriptase and random primers (Life Technologies). qPCR reactions were performed in 20 µl reaction volume in triplicate, using 2 µl cDNA diluted 1:20, 10 µl of Platinum® SYBR® Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG kit (Life Technologies) and 1 µM of each primer (Table 1). qPCR was performed using the following cycling conditions: 95 °C: 10 min; 39 cycles: 95 °C: 10 s, 55 °C: 15 s, 72 °C: 20 s; 72 °C: 5 min. Relative expression analysis was performed manually using Pfaffl’s Augmented ΔΔCt method104 whereby the comparative cycle threshold (Ct) values of the samples of interest are compared to a control and normalised to three housekeeping genes, β-actin, B2M and GAPDH, according to a modified tool from geNorm. In order for this method to be valid, amplification efficiencies of individual reactions were verified using the comparative quantification package within the Rotor-Gene Q software v2.1.0. Annealing temperatures and melt-curve analysis was also carried out to check for single DNA products produced by these primer sets.

Mass spectrometry analysis of ovine peritoneal fluid

Pooled peritoneal fluid supernatant samples from the uninfected and infected groups from the two experimental trials were precipitated using trichloroacetic acid (TCA), followed by analysis by 1-DE using a 4–12% SDS PAGE (Criterion XT Bis-Tris; BioRad). In-gel trypsin digestion was carried out followed by ES/MS-MS analysis using an Ekspert NanoLC425 (Eksigent) coupled to a 5600+ mass spectrometer (AB Sciex) equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source. Peak list files were generated by Paragon and Progroup algorithms (Protein Pilot version 5.0; Sciex) using default parameters.

Database searching and criteria for protein identification

All MS/MS spectra were analysed with Mascot (version 2.4.0), against the Uniprot sheep protein databank (27174 entries), assuming digestion with trypsin with 2 missed cleavages permitted. Fragment and parent ion mass tolerance for Mascot were set at 0.10 Da. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was specified as a fixed modification and oxidation of methionine was specified as a variable modifications. Scaffold (version 4.6.2; Proteome Software Inc) was used to validate MS/MS based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 95% probability to achieve an FDR less than 1% by the Scaffold Local FDR algorithm105. Protein identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 95% probability to achieve an FDR less than 1% and contained at least 2 identified peptides. Protein probabilities were assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm106. Proteins that contained similar peptides and could not be differentiated based on MS/MS analysis alone were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony.

Protein abundance was calculated by Scaffold software based upon the normalised exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) protocol. A normalization minimum value of 0.05 was added to all values to compensate for null or zero values and to allow for log transformation of the data. The averages of the emPAI values from the biological replicates were used for statistical analysis of protein abundance, resulting in an overall fold change difference being calculated relative to the uninfected group. Multiple pairwise t-tests were performed in Scaffold; P value < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Liver Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Three µm paraffin wax liver sections were analysed using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) method. Tissue sections were dewaxed, rehydrated and endogenous peroxidase activity was exhausted by incubation with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min at RT. Two different antigen retrieval pre-treatments were used107, 108: (1) Detection of periostin: 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer, pH 6, heated for 20 min; (2) Detection of VCAM-1: Tris-EDTA buffer, pH 9, heated for 30 min. Sections were washed in PBS (pH 7.2) and incubated with 20% normal goat serum (ImmunoPure) for 30 min at RT. Endogenous liver biotin was blocked using the Avidin/Biotin blocking kit (Vector Laboratories). Overnight incubations at 4 °C were carried out using the following primary antibodies, rabbit anti-human periostin polyclonal antibody (LifeSpan BioSciences) and VCAM-1 rabbit anti-mouse monoclonal antibody (also cross reacts with rat & human; Abcam) both diluted 1:500 in PBS containing 10% normal goat serum. Following washing in PBS, the sections were incubated with the secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit biotinylated antibody; Dako) diluted 1:200 in PBS containing 10% normal goat serum for 30 min at RT. After washing in PBS, the sections were incubated with the ABC complex (Vectastain ABC Elite Kit) for 1 h at RT in darkness, washed in 0.05 M Tris buffered saline (pH 7.6) and then incubated in the chromogen solution (Vector NovaRED Peroxidase Substrate Kit). Finally, the sections were counterstained with Harris’ hematoxylin and mounted in Eukitt quick-hardening mounting medium (Sigma).

Statistical Analysis

Mann Whitney U tests and One Way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc tests performed on GraphPad Prism version 6.00 were used for statistical comparisons. P values of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Correlation analysis of the proteomic data was performed on GraphPad Prism version 6.00.

Accession Codes

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE109 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD005548 and 10.6019/PXD005548.

References

  1. 1.

    Spithill, T. W. et al. Development of vaccines against Fasciola hepatica in Fasciolosis (ed Dalton, J. P.) 377–410 (CABI Publishing, 1999).

  2. 2.

    Mas-Coma, S., Bargues, M. D. & Valero, M. A. Fascioliasis and other plant-borne trematode zoonoses. Int. J. Parasitol. 35, 1255–1278, doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.010 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Piedrafita, D., Spithill, T. W., Smith, R. E. & Raadsma, H. W. Improving animal and human health through understanding liver fluke immunology. Parasite Immunol. 32, 572–581, doi:10.1111/j.1365-3024.2010.01223.x (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mas-Coma, S. Epidemiology of fascioliasis in human endemic areas. J. Helminthol. 79, 207–216, doi:10.1079/JOH2005296 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mas-Coma, S., Valero, M. A. & Bargues, M. D. Chapter 2. Fasciola, lymnaeids and human fascioliasis, with a global overview on disease transmission, epidemiology, evolutionary genetics, molecular epidemiology and control. Adv. Parasitol. 69, 41–146, doi:10.1016/S0065-308X(09)69002-3 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gonzalez, L. C. et al. Hyperendemic human fascioliasis in Andean valleys: an altitudinal transect analysis in children of Cajamarca province, Peru. Acta Trop. 120, 119–129, doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.07.002 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sangster, N. C. Managing parasiticide resistance. Vet. Parasitol. 98, 89–109, doi:10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00425-3 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mezo, M., Gonzalez-Warleta, M., Castro-Hermida, J. A. & Ubeira, F. M. Evaluation of the flukicide treatment policy for dairy cattle in Galicia (NW Spain). Vet. Parasitol. 157, 235–243, doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.07.032 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Knubben-Schweizer, G. et al. Control of bovine fasciolosis in dairy cattle in Switzerland with emphasis on pasture management. Vet. J. 186, 188–191, doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.003 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Animal Health Ireland. Liver Fluke - the facts. http://www.animalhealthireland.ie/ckfinder/userfiles/files/Animal%20Health%20Liver%20Fluke%206pp-web%281%29.pdf (2011).

  11. 11.

    Charlier, J., Vercruysse, J., Morgan, E., van Dijk, J. & Williams, D. J. Recent advances in the diagnosis, impact on production and prediction of Fasciola hepatica in cattle. Parasitology 141, 326–335, doi:10.1017/S0031182013001662 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Molina-Hernandez, V. et al. Fasciola hepatica vaccine: we may not be there yet but we’re on the right road. Vet. Parasitol. 208, 101–111, doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.01.004 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dalton, J. P., Robinson, M. W., Mulcahy, G., O’Neill, S. M. & Donnelly, S. Immunomodulatory molecules of Fasciola hepatica: candidates for both vaccine and immunotherapeutic development. Vet. Parasitol. 195, 272–285, doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.04.008 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Aitken, M. M., Hughes, D. L., Jones, P. W., Hall, G. A. & Smith, G. S. Immunological responses of fluke-infected and fluke-free cattle to Salmonella dublin and other antigens. Res. Vet. Sci. 27, 306–312 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Aitken, M. M., Jones, P. W., Hall, G. A., Hughes, D. L. & Brown, G. T. Responses of fluke-infected and fluke-free cattle to experimental reinfection with Salmonella dublin. Res. Vet. Sci. 31, 120–126 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hall, G. A. et al. Experimental oral Salmonella dublin infection in cattle: effects of concurrent infection with Fasciola hepatica. J. Comp. Pathol. 91, 227–233, doi:10.1016/0021-9975(81)90027-X (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Brady, M. T., O’Neill, S. M., Dalton, J. P. & Mills, K. H. Fasciola hepatica suppresses a protective Th1 response against Bordetella pertussis. Infect. Immun. 67, 5372–5378 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Flynn, R. J., Mannion, C., Golden, O., Hacariz, O. & Mulcahy, G. Experimental Fasciola hepatica infection alters responses to tests used for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 75, 1373–1381, doi:10.1128/IAI.01445-06 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Flynn, R. J. et al. Co-Infection of cattle with Fasciola hepatica and Mycobacterium bovis- immunological consequences. Transbound Emerg. Dis. 56, 269–274, doi:10.1111/jva.2009.56.issue-6-7 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    NADIS. Liver fluke control in sheep. Accessed http://www.nadis.org.uk/bulletins/liver-fluke-control-in-sheep.aspx (February 2017).

  21. 21.

    Brennan, G. P. et al. Understanding triclabendazole resistance. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 82, 104–109, doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2007.01.009 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zafra, R. et al. Early and late peritoneal and hepatic changes in goats immunized with recombinant cathepsin L1 and infected with Fasciola hepatica. J. Comp. Pathol. 148, 373–384, doi:10.1016/j.jcpa.2012.08.007 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zafra, R. et al. Early hepatic and peritoneal changes and immune response in goats vaccinated with a recombinant glutathione transferase sigma class and challenged with Fasciola hepatica. Res. Vet. Sci. 94, 602–609, doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.10.026 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Morphew, R. M., Wright, H. A., LaCourse, E. J., Woods, D. J. & Brophy, P. M. Comparative proteomics of excretory-secretory proteins released by the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica in sheep host bile and during in vitro culture ex host. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 963–972, doi:10.1074/mcp.M600375-MCP200 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rioux, M. C. et al. Discovery and validation of serum biomarkers expressed over the first twelve weeks of Fasciola hepatica infection in sheep. Int. J. Parasitol. 38, 123–136, doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.07.017 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ferrero, S. et al. Proteomic analysis of peritoneal fluid in women with endometriosis. J. Proteome Res. 6, 3402–3411, doi:10.1021/pr060680q (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ferrero, S. et al. Proteomic analysis of peritoneal fluid in fertile and infertile women with endometriosis. J. Reprod. Med. 54, 32–40 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Amon, L. M. et al. Integrative proteomic analysis of serum and peritoneal fluids helps identify proteins that are up-regulated in serum of women with ovarian cancer. PLoS One 5, e11137, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011137 (2010).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wang, H. Y. et al. Impact of uremic environment on peritoneum: a proteomic view. J. Proteomics 75, 2053–2063, doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2012.01.011 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    eCLINPATH; online textbook on Veterinary Clinical Pathology by Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine. Accessed March 2017 http://www.eclinpath.com/chemistry/liver/liver-injury/glutamate-dehydrogenase/.

  31. 31.

    Al-Rukibat, R. K., Ismail, Z. B., Al-Majali, A. M. & Al-Zghoul, M. B. Peritoneal fluid analysis in adult, nonpregnant Awassi sheep. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 35, 215–218, doi:10.1111/vcp.2006.35.issue-2 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jia, G. et al. Periostin is a systemic biomarker of eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthmatic patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 130, 647–654.e10, doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.06.025 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Liu, A. Y., Zheng, H. & Ouyang, G. Periostin, a multifunctional matricellular protein in inflammatory and tumor microenvironments. Matrix Biol. 37, 150–156, doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2014.04.007 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bacchi, C. E. et al. Expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) in liver and pancreas allograft rejection. Am. J. Pathol. 142, 579–591 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cwiklinski, K. et al. The Fasciola hepatica genome: gene duplication and polymorphism reveals adaptation to the host environment and the capacity for rapid evolution. Genome Biol. 16, 71–015-0632-2 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Toet, H., Piedrafita, D. M. & Spithill, T. W. Liver fluke vaccines in ruminants: strategies, progress and future opportunities. Int. J. Parasitol. (2014).

  37. 37.

    Sibille, P., Tliba, O. & Boulard, C. Early and transient cytotoxic response of peritoneal cells from Fasciola hepatica-infected rats. Vet. Res. 35, 573–584, doi:10.1051/vetres:2004033 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Perez, J. et al. Pathological and immunohistochemical study of the liver and hepatic lymph nodes of sheep chronically reinfected with Fasciola hepatica, with or without triclabendazole treatment. J. Comp. Pathol. 127, 30–36, doi:10.1053/jcpa.2002.0561 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Alvarez Rojas, C. A. et al. Transcriptional analysis identifies key genes involved in metabolism, fibrosis/tissue repair and the immune response against Fasciola hepatica in sheep liver. Parasit. Vectors 8, 124-015-0715-7 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Rojas-Caraballo, J. et al. Gene Expression Profile in the Liver of BALB/c Mice Infected with Fasciola hepatica. PLoS One 10, e0134910, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134910 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cadman, E. T. et al. Eosinophils are important for protection, immunoregulation and pathology during infection with nematode microfilariae. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1003988, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003988 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Davies, S. J. et al. In vivo imaging of tissue eosinophilia and eosinopoietic responses to schistosome worms and eggs. Int. J. Parasitol. 35, 851–859, doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.02.017 (2005).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Reimert, C. M. et al. Eosinophil activity in Schistosoma mansoni infections in vivo and in vitro in relation to plasma cytokine profile pre- and post-treatment with praziquantel. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 13, 584–593, doi:10.1128/CVI.13.5.584-593.2006 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hogan, S. P. et al. Eosinophils: biological properties and role in health and disease. Clin. Exp. Allergy 38, 709–750, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02958.x (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ohnmacht, C., Pullner, A., van Rooijen, N. & Voehringer, D. Analysis of eosinophil turnover in vivo reveals their active recruitment to and prolonged survival in the peritoneal cavity. J. Immunol. 179, 4766–4774, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4766 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Donnelly, S., O’Neill, S. M., Sekiya, M., Mulcahy, G. & Dalton, J. P. Thioredoxin peroxidase secreted by Fasciola hepatica induces the alternative activation of macrophages. Infect. Immun. 73, 166–173, doi:10.1128/IAI.73.1.166-173.2005 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Donnelly, S. et al. Helminth 2-Cys peroxiredoxin drives Th2 responses through a mechanism involving alternatively activated macrophages. FASEB J. 22, 4022–4032, doi:10.1096/fj.08-106278 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mulcahy, G. et al. Correlation of specific antibody titre and avidity with protection in cattle immunized against Fasciola hepatica. Vaccine 16, 932–939, doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(97)00289-2 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Mulcahy, G. et al. Immune responses of cattle to experimental anti-Fasciola hepatica vaccines. Res. Vet. Sci. 67, 27–33, doi:10.1053/rvsc.1998.0270 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Walsh, K. P., Brady, M. T., Finlay, C. M., Boon, L. & Mills, K. H. Infection with a helminth parasite attenuates autoimmunity through TGF-beta-mediated suppression of Th17 and Th1 responses. J. Immunol. 183, 1577–1586, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0803803 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Flynn, R. J., Mulcahy, G. & Elsheikha, H. M. Coordinating innate and adaptive immunity in Fasciola hepatica infection: implications for control. Vet. Parasitol. 169, 235–240, doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.02.015 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hacariz, O., Sayers, G., Flynn, R. J., Lejeune, A. & Mulcahy, G. IL-10 and TGF-beta1 are associated with variations in fluke burdens following experimental fasciolosis in sheep. Parasite Immunol. 31, 613–622, doi:10.1111/pim.2009.31.issue-10 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Belkaid, Y., Blank, R. B. & Suffia, I. Natural regulatory T cells and parasites: a common quest for host homeostasis. Immunol. Rev. 212, 287–300, doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00409.x (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Macey, M. R. et al. IL-4 and TGF-beta 1 counterbalance one another while regulating mast cell homeostasis. J. Immunol. 184, 4688–4695, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0903477 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Smith, N. C., Ovington, K. S. & Boray, J. C. Fasciola hepatica: free radical generation by peritoneal leukocytes in challenged rodents. Int. J. Parasitol. 22, 281–286, doi:10.1016/S0020-7519(05)80005-0 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Piedrafita, D. et al. Peritoneal lavage cells of Indonesian thin-tail sheep mediate antibody-dependent superoxide radical cytotoxicity in vitro against newly excysted juvenile Fasciola gigantica but not juvenile Fasciola hepatica. Infect. Immun. 75, 1954–1963, doi:10.1128/IAI.01034-06 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Jedlina, L., Kozak-Ljunggren, M. & Wedrychowicz, H. In vivo studies of the early, peritoneal, cellular and free radical response in rats infected with Fasciola hepatica by flow cytometric analysis. Exp. Parasitol. 128, 291–297, doi:10.1016/j.exppara.2011.02.004 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Beesley, N. J., Williams, D. J., Paterson, S. & Hodgkinson, J. Fasciola hepatica demonstrates high levels of genetic diversity, a lack of population structure and high gene flow: possible implications for drug resistance. Int. J. Parasitol. 47, 11–20, doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.09.007 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sidhu, S. S. et al. Roles of epithelial cell-derived periostin in TGF-beta activation, collagen production, and collagen gel elasticity in asthma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107, 14170–14175, doi:10.1073/pnas.1009426107 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Tartibi, H. M. & Bahna, S. L. Clinical and biological markers of asthma control. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 10, 1453–1461, doi:10.1586/1744666X.2014.962516 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Rosselli-Murai, L. K. et al. Periostin responds to mechanical stress and tension by activating the MTOR signaling pathway. PLoS One 8, e83580, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083580 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Riener, M. O. et al. Expression of the extracellular matrix protein periostin in liver tumours and bile duct carcinomas. Histopathology 56, 600–606, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03527.x (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Braun, N. et al. Periostin: a matricellular protein involved in peritoneal injury during peritoneal dialysis. Perit. Dial. Int. 33, 515–528, doi:10.3747/pdi.2010.00259 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Conway, S. J. et al. The role of periostin in tissue remodeling across health and disease. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 71, 1279–1288, doi:10.1007/s00018-013-1494-y (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Takayama, G. et al. Periostin: a novel component of subepithelial fibrosis of bronchial asthma downstream of IL-4 and IL-13 signals. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 118, 98–104, doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2006.02.046 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Li, W. et al. Periostin: its role in asthma and its potential as a diagnostic or therapeutic target. Respir. Res. 16, 57–015-0218-2 (2015).

  67. 67.

    Parulekar, A. D., Atik, M. A. & Hanania, N. A. Periostin, a novel biomarker of TH2-driven asthma. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 20, 60–65, doi:10.1097/MCP.0000000000000005 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Johansson, M. W., Annis, D. S. & Mosher, D. F. Alpha(M)beta(2) integrin-mediated adhesion and motility of IL-5-stimulated eosinophils on periostin. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 48, 503–510, doi:10.1165/rcmb.2012-0150OC (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Bobolea, I. et al. Sputum periostin in patients with different severe asthma phenotypes. Allergy 70, 540–546, doi:10.1111/all.12580 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Masuoka, M. et al. Periostin promotes chronic allergic inflammation in response to Th2 cytokines. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 2590–2600, doi:10.1172/JCI58978 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Sehra, S. et al. Periostin regulates goblet cell metaplasia in a model of allergic airway inflammation. J. Immunol. 186, 4959–4966, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1002359 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Huang, Y. et al. Matricellular protein periostin contributes to hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 185, 786–797, doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.002 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Afford, S. C. et al. Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 expression by biliary epithelium promotes persistence of inflammation by inhibiting effector T-cell apoptosis. Hepatology 59, 1932–1943, doi:10.1002/hep.26965 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Paik, Y. H. et al. Toll-like receptor 4 mediates inflammatory signaling by bacterial lipopolysaccharide in human hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology 37, 1043–1055, doi:10.1053/jhep.2003.50182 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Jaruga, B., Hong, F., Kim, W. H. & Gao, B. IFN-gamma/STAT1 acts as a proinflammatory signal in T cell-mediated hepatitis via induction of multiple chemokines and adhesion molecules: a critical role of IRF-1. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 287, G1044–52, doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00184.2004 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Qin, P., Tang, X., Elloso, M. M. & Harnish, D. C. Bile acids induce adhesion molecule expression in endothelial cells through activation of reactive oxygen species, NF-kappaB, and p38. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 291, H741–7, doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01182.2005 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Cannistra, S. A., Ottensmeier, C., Tidy, J. & DeFranzo, B. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expressed by peritoneal mesothelium partly mediates the binding of activated human T lymphocytes. Exp. Hematol. 22, 996–1002 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Li, X. C., Jevnikar, A. M. & Grant, D. R. Expression of functional ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 adhesion molecules by an immortalized epithelial cell clone derived from the small intestine. Cell. Immunol. 175, 58–66, doi:10.1006/cimm.1996.1050 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    DiScipio, R. G. & Schraufstatter, I. U. The role of the complement anaphylatoxins in the recruitment of eosinophils. Int. Immunopharmacol. 7, 1909–1923, doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2007.07.006 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Ramalho-Pinto, F. J., McLaren, D. J. & Smithers, S. R. Complement-mediated killing of schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni by rat eosinophils in vitro. J. Exp. Med. 147, 147–156, doi:10.1084/jem.147.1.147 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Vignali, D. A., Bickle, Q. D., Taylor, M. G., Tennent, G. & Pepys, M. B. Comparison of the role of complement in immunity to Schistosoma mansoni in rats and mice. Immunology 63, 55–61 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Montgomery, T. D., Leid, R. W. & Wescott, R. B. Interaction of bovine complement with Fasciola hepatica. Vet. Parasitol. 19, 55–65, doi:10.1016/0304-4017(86)90032-4 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Baeza, E., Poitou, I., Villejoubert, C. & Boulard, C. Complement depletion in rats infected with Fasciola hepatica: in vivo and in vitro studies. Vet. Parasitol. 51, 219–230, doi:10.1016/0304-4017(94)90159-7 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Schuppan, D., Ruehl, M., Somasundaram, R. & Hahn, E. G. Matrix as a modulator of hepatic fibrogenesis. Semin. Liver Dis. 21, 351–372, doi:10.1055/s-2001-17556 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Ruhl, M. et al. Soluble collagen VI drives serum-starved fibroblasts through S phase and prevents apoptosis via down-regulation of Bax. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34361–34368, doi:10.1074/jbc.274.48.34361 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Atkinson, J. C., Ruhl, M., Becker, J., Ackermann, R. & Schuppan, D. Collagen VI regulates normal and transformed mesenchymal cell proliferation in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 228, 283–291, doi:10.1006/excr.1996.0328 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Mak, K. M., Sehgal, P. & Harris, C. K. Type VI Collagen: Its Biology and Value as a Biomarker of Hepatic Fibrosis. Austin Biomark Diagn 1, 9, doi:10.1155/2014/839560 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Hahn, E., Wick, G., Pencev, D. & Timpl, R. Distribution of basement membrane proteins in normal and fibrotic human liver: collagen type IV, laminin, and fibronectin. Gut 21, 63–71, doi:10.1136/gut.21.1.63 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Odenthal, M., Neubauer, K., Meyer zum Buschenfelde, K. H. & Ramadori, G. Localization and mRNA steady-state level of cellular fibronectin in rat liver undergoing a CCl4-induced acute damage or fibrosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1181, 266–272, doi:10.1016/0925-4439(93)90031-U (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Rescan, P. Y. et al. Distribution and origin of the basement membrane component perlecan in rat liver and primary hepatocyte culture. Am. J. Pathol. 142, 199–208 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Robinson, M. W., Menon, R., Donnelly, S. M., Dalton, J. P. & Ranganathan, S. An integrated transcriptomics and proteomics analysis of the secretome of the helminth pathogen Fasciola hepatica: proteins associated with invasion and infection of the mammalian host. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 1891–1907, doi:10.1074/mcp.M900045-MCP200 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Young, N. D., Hall, R. S., Jex, A. R., Cantacessi, C. & Gasser, R. B. Elucidating the transcriptome of Fasciola hepatica - a key to fundamental and biotechnological discoveries for a neglected parasite. Biotechnol. Adv. 28, 222–231, doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.12.003 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Cancela, M. et al. Survey of transcripts expressed by the invasive juvenile stage of the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica. BMC Genomics 11, 227–2164–11–227 (2010).

  94. 94.

    Reese, J. T. et al. Bovine Genome Database: supporting community annotation and analysis of the Bos taurus genome. BMC Genomics 11, 645–2164–11–645 (2010).

  95. 95.

    Childers, C. P. et al. Bovine Genome Database: integrated tools for genome annotation and discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D830–4, doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1235 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Jiang, Y. et al. The sheep genome illuminates biology of the rumen and lipid metabolism. Science 344, 1168–1173, doi:10.1126/science.1252806 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Fu, Y. et al. Transcriptomic Study on Ovine Immune Responses to Fasciola hepatica Infection. PLoS Negl Trop. Dis. 10, e0005015, doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005015 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Alvarez Rojas, C. A. et al. Time-Course Study of the Transcriptome of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) from Sheep Infected with Fasciola hepatica. PLoS One 11, e0159194, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159194 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Daines, S. M., Wang, Y. & Orlandi, R. R. Periostin and osteopontin are overexpressed in chronically inflamed sinuses. Int. Forum. Allergy Rhinol. 1, 101–105, doi:10.1002/alr.v1.2 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Kuhn, B. et al. Periostin induces proliferation of differentiated cardiomyocytes and promotes cardiac repair. Nat. Med. 13, 962–969, doi:10.1038/nm1619 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Ma, Y. et al. In Inflammation in Heart Failure (ed Blankesteijn, M., Altara, R.) 67–79 (Academic Press, 2015).

  102. 102.

    Novick, D. et al. Interleukin-18 binding protein: a novel modulator of the Th1 cytokine response. Immunity 10, 127–136, doi:10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80013-8 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Collins, P. R. et al. Cathepsin L1, the major protease involved in liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) virulence: propetide cleavage sites and autoactivation of the zymogen secreted from gastrodermal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 17038–17046, doi:10.1074/jbc.M308831200 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45–45, doi:10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383–5392, doi:10.1021/ac025747h (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Nesvizhskii, A. I., Keller, A., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646–4658, doi:10.1021/ac0341261 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Krenacs, L., Krenacs, T., Stelkovics, E. & Raffeld, M. Heat-induced antigen retrieval for immunohistochemical reactions in routinely processed paraffin sections. Methods Mol. Biol. 588, 103–119, doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-324-0_14 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Ramos-Vara, J. A. Principles and methods of immunohistochemistry. Methods Mol. Biol. 691, 83–96, doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-849-2_5 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Vizcaino, J. A. et al. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D447–56, doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1145 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Lacroux, C. et al. Haemonchus contortus (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) infection in lambs elicits an unequivocal Th2 immune response. Vet. Res. 37, 607–622, doi:10.1051/vetres:2006022 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Kuypers, E. et al. Intraamniotic lipopolysaccharide exposure changes cell populations and structure of the ovine fetal thymus. Reprod. Sci. 20, 946–956, doi:10.1177/1933719112472742 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Kuypers, E. et al. Responses of the spleen to intraamniotic lipopolysaccharide exposure in fetal sheep. Pediatr. Res. 77, 29–35, doi:10.1038/pr.2014.152 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    McNeilly, T. N. et al. Suppression of ovine lymphocyte activation by Teladorsagia circumcincta larval excretory-secretory products. Vet. Res. 44, 70–9716–44–70 (2013).

  114. 114.

    Adler, H. et al. Inducible nitric oxide synthase in cattle. Differential cytokine regulation of nitric oxide synthase in bovine and murine macrophages. J. Immunol. 154, 4710–4718 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the primer sequences kindly shared by Miss I.L. Pacheco at the University of Cordoba. The authors would also like to acknowledge Dr Catherine Duffy and Mr Michael Cooper for their assistance in the sheep infection trial carried out at the Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI; UK). Proteomic analysis was carried out by Proteomique Platform of the Quebec Genomics Center (CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Canada). V.M.H., M.S., K.C., and J.P.D. are funded by grants from a European Research Council Advanced Grant (HELIVAC, 322725) awarded to J.P.D. M.T.R.-C., A.E., J.P., A.M.M., J.P.D. and K.C. are members of the Horizon 2020-funded Consortium PARAGONE. V.M.H. was funded by a Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme. J.P., A.M.M., and J.P.D. are members of the FP7-funded Consortium PARAVAC.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.P., A.M.M., S.D., J.P.D. and K.C. conceived and designed the experiments. M.T.R.-C., V.M.H. and K.C. performed the experiments. M.T.R.-C., V.M.H., M.S., J.P.D. and K.C. performed the data analysis. A.E., J.P., A.M.M. and J.P.D. contributed reagents/materials. V.M.H., S.D., J.P.D. and K.C. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krystyna Cwiklinski.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruiz-Campillo, M.T., Molina Hernandez, V., Escamilla, A. et al. Immune signatures of pathogenesis in the peritoneal compartment during early infection of sheep with Fasciola hepatica . Sci Rep 7, 2782 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03094-0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing