Article | Open | Published:

Supersonically Spray-Coated Colloidal Quantum Dot Ink Solar Cells

Scientific Reportsvolume 7, Article number: 622 (2017) | Download Citation


Controlling the thickness of quantum dot (QD) films is difficult using existing film formation techniques, which employ pre-ligand-exchanged PbS QD inks, because of several issues: 1) poor colloidal stability, 2) use of high-boiling-point solvents for QD dispersion, and 3) limitations associated with one-step deposition. Herein, we suggest a new protocol for QD film deposition using electrical double-layered PbS QD inks, prepared by solution-phase ligand exchange using methyl ammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3). The films are deposited by the supersonic spraying technique, which facilitates the rapid evaporation of the solvent and the subsequent deposition of the PbS QD ink without requiring a post-deposition annealing treatment for solvent removal. The film thickness could be readily controlled by varying the number of spraying sweeps made across the substrate. This spray deposition process yields high-quality n-type QD films quickly (within 1 min) while minimizing the amount of the PbS QD ink used to less than 5 mg for one device (300-nm-thick absorbing layer, 2.5 × 2.5 cm2). Further, the formation of an additional p-layer by treatment with mercaptopropionic acid allows for facile hole extraction from the QD films, resulting in a power conversion efficiency of 3.7% under 1.5 AM illumination.


Colloidal quantum dots (QDs) have shown great promise for use in optoelectronic applications such as photovoltaics and photodetectors owing to their size- and shape-tunable optical and electrical properties1,2,3. In addition, the high scalability of the devices based on solution processing as well as the fact that they can be integrated readily make this technique highly suited for commercial manufacturing. Lead chalcogenide (PbX, X = S, Se, and Te) QDs with tunable bandgaps spanning the visible to near-infrared (NIR) wavelength range are the most suitable for QD-based next-generation photovoltaics4,5,6.

Typically, QDs synthesized via colloidal routes are capped with long-chain organic ligands that act as an insulating layer; however, this prevents their direct use in electronic devices because of the weak interparticle coupling resulting from the insulating layer7. Thus, a post-synthesis ligand exchange is necessary for such QDs to find use in practical devices, wherein the initial bulky ligands are replaced with shorter ligands. Multistep sequential layer-by-layer (LBL) assembly, in which crack-free conductive films of desired thicknesses are formed using spin-coating, dip-coating, and spray-coating, is the most commonly used technique for fabricating devices such as solar cells and field-effect transistors (FETs)8.

Nevertheless, such LBL fabrication techniques for forming conductive films suffer from several associated issues. For instance, close-packed dense films that are free of cracks and voids formed because of the decrease in the volume of the ligands after the ligand exchange process are hard to produce9,10,11. Further, the spin-coating and dip-coating techniques are typically used; however, these only allow for small-scale batch processing and are incompatible with roll-to-roll manufacturing schemes. Recently, several groups have explored spray coating because it may potentially offer the advantages of a well-established industrial technique12,13,14. However, they used native-ligand-passivated QDs dispersed in organic solvents as the QD precursors, which required ligand exchange after deposition. In addition, while LBL assembly is, by far, the most suitable technique for forming films that exhibit the desired thickness, it generally involves significant losses of the QD solution and is a time-consuming process13, 14.

Recently, a strategy has been developed wherein the native ligands are replaced with shorter ligands in the solution phase itself; this strategy allows for the direct deposition of the QD solution onto the substrate, yielding conductive films without requiring a solid-state ligand exchange9, 11, 15,16,17,18,19. However, these QDs with short ligands, whose dispersions are termed as QD inks, do not exhibit colloidal stability, thus making it difficult to fabricate high-quality QD films by controlling certain parameters, such as the film thickness15, 20. Moreover, QD inks are typically dispersed in a high-boiling-point solvent such as propylene carbonate (PC) or dimethylformamide16. The use of such high-boiling-point solvents makes it difficult to fabricate QD films because removing the solvent during deposition is cumbersome. Therefore, a single-step-deposition process becomes inevitable; however, such processes do not allow for sophisticated control over the film thickness. Kim et al. recently fabricated QD solar cells using an iodide-terminated PbS QD ink as the light-absorbing layer. They used the spin-coating method to deposit the films and reported that the efficiency was limited by the thickness of the deposited layer, which was ~150 nm15.

In this study, we propose a new method for the deposition of conductive PbS QD films using PbS QD inks by a supersonic spray-coating method. The proposed method is a quick one as it involves rapid (supersonic) spraying. We used a PbS QD ink stabilized with MAPbI3, which are colloidally stable under ambient conditions, as determined through dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements and absorbance spectra analysis. Using this deposition method, the film thickness can be tuned simply by varying the number of spraying passes made. Precursor wastage is minimized, because the precursor is deposited onto the substrate with high accuracy. Finally, the photovoltaic cells produced from the PbS QD ink by using this coating approach exhibit a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 3.7%.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of PbS QD ink

Oleate-capped PbS QDs were synthesized by using Pb(oleate)2 and bis(trimethylsilyl) sulfide21. PbS QDs with a diameter of 3 nm and exhibiting the 1st excitonic transition peak at 880 nm (see absorbance spectra in Fig. S1) were used for fabricating solar cells. Before the ligand-exchange process, the PbS QDs were dispersed in octane, while the MAPbI3 precursor was dissolved in N-methylformamide (NMF).

To ensure fast and efficient ligand exchange in the concentrated PbS QDs-oleate solution (100 mg·mL−1, 10 mL), the QDs were added to a highly concentrated solution of the replacement ligand (1 M, 10 mL). The ligand-exchange process was accelerated by stirring at 100 °C (Fig. 1), in contrast to the conventional ligand-exchange process, which is performed at room temperature11, 16. NMF, which was used as the solvent for MAPbI3, has an ultrahigh dielectric constant (ε ≈ 182), which allows for electrostatic stabilization between the surfaces of the PbS QDs and the new MAPbI3 ligands. The complete phase transfer of the PbS QDs from octane to NMF took less than 10 min. To ensure compatibility between the two phases, acetone (ε ≈ 21) was used as the nonsolvent; as a result, the PbS QDs-MAPbI3 could be isolated by the centrifugation of the destabilized QD solution. PC was used as the solvent, in order to ensure the electrostatic stability of the concentrated PbS QDs-MAPbI3 solution (~100 mg·mL−1) after the removal of the free ligands by purification, because of its high dielectric constant (ε ≈ 64) as well as the weak desorption of the anions and the efficient solvation of the cations16. On the other hand, NMF was found to be unsuitable because it caused the strong desorption of the anions (PbI3), leading to a weak electrostatic double layer, even when the PbS QDs-MAPbI3 were dissolved in NMF before purification.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Illustration of phase transfer of PbS QDs from nonpolar solvent (octane) to polar solvent (NMF) induced by ligand exchange of oleates with CH3NH3PbI3 (MAPbI3). Acetone and PC were used for purification and redispersion, respectively.

Characterization of PbS QD ink in solution phase

Figure 2A shows the absorption and emission spectra of the PbS QDs-MAPbI3 system. It can be seen that the absorption (~77 meV) and emission (~92 meV) spectra are slightly red-shifted compared to those of the PbS QDs-oleate (Fig. S1). Further, distinct absorbance features are observed after the ligand-exchange reaction at 100 °C, indicating that the size of the particles remains unchanged and that quantum confinement occurs without severe particle aggregation. Further, TEM images of the PbS QDs-MAPbI3 also confirm that the size of the particles is preserved after the ligand-exchange process and that the size distribution is narrow (Fig. S2). The colloidal and air stabilities of the QD ink were monitored based on the changes in the absorption peaks as well as the particle size over time as by determined by DLS measurements (Fig. 2B). DLS is a useful tool for monitoring the presence of aggregates and has been used widely for determining the hydrodynamic size of nanoparticles in colloidal suspensions22. The average hydrodynamic diameter of the particles in the PbS QD ink, as measured by DLS, was 3 nm, which is similar to the value obtained from the TEM measurements (Figs S2 and S3), with the particle size remaining constant over time (Fig. 2B, right). Furthermore, the optical density (OD) corresponding to the 1st excitonic transition at 930 nm in the absorbance spectrum (Fig. S4) was monitored to determine whether particle aggregation occurred over time. The peaks remained constant and did not undergo broadening for more than four weeks, implying that the PbS QD ink exhibited high colloidal and air stabilities. In several previous studies, halide salts were used to improve the air stability of air-unstable lead chalcogenide QDs23, 24.

Figure 2
Figure 2

(A) Absorption (red line) and photoluminescence (blue line) spectra of PbS QDs-MAPbI3 dispersed in PC. (B) Changes in optical density corresponding to 1st excitonic peaks (squares) as determined from absorption spectrum (Fig. S3) and hydrodynamic size (circles) as measured by DLS over time.

The ligand-exchange process was attempted using other precursors such as MAPbBr3, and MAPbCl3 dissolved in NMF. The results for the PbS QDs-MAPbBr3 system were similar to those obtained for the PbS QDs-MAPbI3 congener, as evidenced by the optical properties and TEM images (Figs S5 and S6). In contrast, the MAPbCl3 precursor induced particle aggregation, as determined by the results of absorbance, photoluminescence (PL), and TEM analyses (Figs S5 and S6). As per the concept of hard and soft acids and bases developed by Pearson, the soft acidic Pb atoms on the surfaces of the PbS QDs preferentially bind to the soft bases I and Br instead of the hard base Cl25.

The PbS QDs-MAPbI3 dispersed in PC were negatively charged, as indicated by the fact that their average ξ-potential was −13 mV, as determined by electrophoretic measurements (Fig. S7). Sayevich et al.10 reported that iodide-capped PbSe QDs formed from a NH4I precursor via a solution-phase ligand-exchange process have a ξ-potential of −28 mV. The QD ink-MAPbI3 particles were less negatively charged because an electrical double layer comprising PbI3 anions and MA cations is formed; this double layer encapsulates the QDs, suggesting that the surfaces of the synthesized QDs are well stabilized by the MAPbI3 ligands in the colloids.

Fabrication of PbS QD films

PbS QD inks can be used directly to rapidly form simple conductive films without further ligand exchange, whereas the PbS QDs-oleate system requires an LBL process for ligand exchange, as depicted in Fig. S8. Herein, the PbS QD ink films were fabricated via a spray-coating method under ambient conditions, as shown in Fig. 3A and Video SI. During the supersonic spraying process, heat and pressure are converted into kinetic and adhesion energies26,27,28. The spraying process allows for the direct deposition of the PbS QDs without requiring the use of any binder material. More importantly, during the spraying process, the air from the supersonic nozzle is heated to temperatures of up to 250 °C, which results in the rapid evaporation of the solvent and facilitates the deposition of the PbS QD ink, making a post-deposition annealing treatment for solvent removal unnecessary. Subsequently, the liquid droplets disintegrate quickly into finer ones because of the drag induced by the supersonic air stream. Thus, only the dried and crystallized QD particles hit the substrate at supersonic speeds, resulting in superior adhesion.

Figure 3
Figure 3

(A) Schematic of spray deposition of PbS QD ink. (B) AFM image (scale bar represents 1 µm), (C) photographic image, and (DG) cross-sectional SEM images (scale bars represent 500 nm) of PbS QD films deposited by spray coating for (D) 8 sweeps, (E) 10 sweeps, (F) 12 sweeps, and (G) 14 sweeps. Average film roughness is 3.4 nm.

In order to obtain films of higher quality, we adjusted various parameters such as the nozzle temperature, solution concentration, and gas pressure. To begin with, by varying the nozzle temperature for PbS QD ink film deposition from 150 °C to 400 °C, we found that the optimal nozzle temperature is 250 °C, as shown in Fig. S9. Propylene carbonate, a solvent for QD inks, has a very high boiling point (242 °C). Thus, when the films were coated at temperatures lower than 250 °C, deposition did not occur even when the number of spraying passes was increased. Further, the films formed at temperatures of 300 °C or higher were not transparent enough even when the number of spraying passes was reduced and the duration of the passes kept short, in order to ensure that the films exhibited the desired thickness. Next, we fabricated PbS QD films at 250 °C while varying the PbS QD concentration to 3 and 10 mg mL−1. The concentration of the PbS QDs must be low enough to allow for the rapid evaporation of the carrier solution while ensuring the optimal dispersion of the residual PbS QDs. If the PbS QD concentration is too high, agglomeration may occur. Lastly, we fabricated PbS QD films at 250 °C while varying the gas pressure to 3 and 4 bar. The change in the operating pressure resulted in changes in the velocity of the jet stream. At higher pressures, the jet stream was faster; thus, the impact of the droplets of the PbS QD ink against the substrate was stronger, resulting in the formation of denser films.

Figure 3B shows atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the close-packed PbS QD films with a thickness of 300 nm deposited on glass substrates by spray coating. It can be seen that the PbS QD films have a smooth topography with a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of 3.4 nm; this is indicative of the high quality of the spray-deposited films. In addition, the film thickness could be controlled readily based on the number of passes/sweeps made during the spraying process; films with thicknesses of 130–400 nm could be obtained with 8–14 sweeps (Fig. 3D–G). A PbS QD ink solution with a concentration of only 3 mg mL−1 was supplied to the atomizer at a flow rate of 2 mL·min−1, and the spraying time required per pass was merely 4 s for an area with dimensions of 2.5 × 2.5 cm2 (see Experimental Section). The number of spraying passes/sweeps, N, required to deposit a 300-nm-thick film was 12. Therefore, the total amount of PbS QD ink used was 5 mg, and the entire deposition process took less than 1 min. Thus, the proposed supersonic spraying process can produce uniform PbS QD films by rapid and simple spraying using only a small amount of QD ink, as compared to other LBL processes involving spin and spray coating, which typically require more than 30 min to produce QD films with similar thicknesses4, 13, 14. Further, we evaluated whether the proposed method was suitable for forming flexible, large-area films by depositing the PbS QD ink to form a film on a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate (10 × 6 cm2). As can be seen from Fig. S10, the proposed method has distinct advantages over conventional spin-coating methods.

Characterization of PbS QD films

The native oleate ligands were completely replaced by MAPbI3, as confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Fig. S11). Prior to the ligand exchange, peaks related to several stretching and vibration modes of the oleate ligands were observed in the IR spectrum, such as the C–H and O–H stretching modes (2800–3500 cm−1), the C–H bending vibrations, and the carboxylic C–O and vinyl C = C stretching modes (600–1500 cm−1); however, all the peaks related to the stretching modes corresponding to the original ligands disappeared after the ligand exchange. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the MAPbI3-stabilized PbS QD ink film was similar to that of the PbS QDs-oleate film. (Fig. S12). Notably, no peaks related to MAPbI3 perovskite solids and I-containing phases of other impurities were observed. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to further confirm the chemical environment of the PbS QDs capped with MAPbI3 and compare it with that of the PbS QDs-oleate (Fig. 4A–C).

Figure 4
Figure 4

Binding energies of (A) Pb 4f, (B) I 3d, and (C) N 1 s as determined by XPS analysis of PbS QDs capped with oleate (black line) and MAPbI3 (red line) ligands.

The binding energy of the Pb 4f7/2 species was higher by approximately 0.4 eV in the case of the PbS QDs-oleate as compared to that (137.9 eV) in the case of the MAPbI3-stabilized PbS QDs; this can be attributed to two factors: the fact that the PbI3-PbS QD films exhibited higher conductivity as compared to the insulating PbS QDs-oleate and to the formation of Pb-I bonds by the MAPbI3 ligands29. More importantly, a difference was observed in the shapes of the XPS spectra of the PbS QDs before and after the ligand-exchange reaction. We deconvoluted the measured XPS spectra of the PbS QDs-MAPbI3, as shown in Fig. S13, and found that the Pb 4f7/2 core level comprises two chemical states, which are observed at 137.9 and 136.8 eV, respectively. The main peak is attributable to the Pb component of the PbS-PbI3 structure; however, the smaller one is associated with the metallic Pb decomposed from the PbI2 precursor during the ligand-exchange process. Metallic Pb-related peaks are often seen in the case of organometallic perovskite structures30. The XPS spectra showed I-related peaks at 619.02 and 630.53 eV, which corresponded to I 3d5/2 and I 3d3/2, respectively; however, no nitrogen atoms were detected (Fig. 4C and D). When viewed in combination, the FTIR and XPS data verified that the volatile methyl ammonium cations were removed after film fabrication, thus implying that only the PbI3 ligands passivate the surfaces of the PbS QDs in the solid state9. QD ink films were also formed by other coating methods such as spin coating and drop casting (Fig. S14), in order to determine whether the ligand would change with the coating method; however, no nitrogen atoms were detected in the films produced using these methods either, as shown in Fig. S15.

Before fabricating photovoltaics using the PbS QD ink, ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) was used to determine the electronic energy levels, such as the Fermi level energy (EF) and the valence band maximum (VBM), as functions of the vacuum level. Combining the UPS data and the optical bandgap data as determined from the absorption spectra (Fig. 2A) allowed us to determine the conduction band minimum (CBM). For the PbI3-stabilized PbS QD ink solids, EF was located at 4.82 eV, while the energies corresponding to the CBM and VBM were 4.02 and 5.75 eV, respectively (Fig. 5A, black). Thus, based on the binding energy spectra, it can be surmised that the QD films formed were n-type films. Furthermore, we fabricated FETs using the PbI3-stabilized PbS QD ink solids to confirm the doping polarity. Source and drain Au contacts deposited on highly doped SiO2-coated silicon wafers were used as the substrates, and solutions of the QDs in PC were spray-coated at a nozzle temperature of 250 °C for 3 spraying passes to form ~50-nm-thick films. Figure S17 shows the output and transfer characteristics of a thus-fabricated FET, which clearly exhibits n-type behavior and linear/saturation curves. The electron mobility, μ lin, was determined to be approximately 8.3 cm−2 V−1 S−1 in the linear regime at VDS = 2.5 V.

Figure 5
Figure 5

(A) Energy levels of conduction band minimum and valence band maximum and Fermi energy level versus vacuum level of PbS-PbI3 solids before and after MPA treatment, as determined by UPS measurements (Fig. S16). Structures of film of PbS QDs before (B) and after (C) MPA treatment.

Based on previous studies, the I ions in iodide-capped Pb chalcogenide QD solids can be considered as n-type doping agents9, 10. Unfortunately, such PbS QD inks with n-type polarity cannot be used for fabricating p-n junction photovoltaics, wherein TiO2 and PbS QD films are typically used as the n-layer and p-layer, respectively. Thus, we treated the QD films with 3- mercaptopropionic acid (MPA), in order to change their doping polarity, resulting in p-type QD films, as indicated by the red lines in Fig. 5A (the energy levels corresponding to the EF, CBM, and VBM were 4.68, 3.57, and 5.02 eV, respectively). UPS is a highly surface-sensitive technique, wherein the escape depth is typically only a few angstroms; hence, only the surface layers are probed by this technique31. A small amount of the MPA solution (0.11 M, 0.25 mL) that was placed on the PbI3-capped QD films did fully infiltrate to the bottom of the QD films with a thickness of 300 nm. This suggested that the MPA-treated PbI3-capped QD films consisted of n-type PbS QDs in the bottom layers and p-type PbS QDs in the top layer, resulting in a graded architecture (n+-n-p), as shown in Fig. 5C.

Based on these results, the PbS QDs-MAPbI3 ink was deposited onto a ~80-nm-thick TiO2 layer as the n-layer via the spraying technique (Fig. 3A); the TiO2 layer was formed on a fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass. The coated substrate was subjected to a subsequent treatment with MPA in methanol; this was followed by the deposition of a MoO3/Au/Ag top contact. We evaluated the thickness dependence of the absorbing PbS layer by producing devices using different numbers of spraying sweeps, as mentioned above (Fig. 3C–F). After the spray-coating process, each film was treated with MPA. Thus, only the thickness of the PbI3-capped QD layer was changed. The open-circuit voltage (V OC), short-circuit current (J SC), fill factor (FF), and PCE are plotted as functions of the number of spraying sweeps in Fig. S18. The results indicate that the optimal thickness of the PbS QD ink film was approximately 300 nm, which was obtained after 12 sweeps. In particular, the FF value decreased after 10 sweeps, while the other parameters (J SC , V OC , and PCE) increased with the number of spraying sweeps, with their values being the highest in the case of the film with a thickness of 300 nm and subsequently decreasing for thicker films. This trend was in keeping with previous reports8. The dependence of the device performance on the film thickness is attributable to the high trap state density of the films, which results in a tradeoff between charge generation and collection.

Figure 6 shows the J–V curves (a) and external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra (b) of the optimized devices based on PbS QD ink films produced using MPA solutions of different concentrations and by rinsing in methanol (Fig. S19). The J SC , V OC , and FF values of the device were 20.1 mA·cm−2, 0.45 V, and 41.7%, respectively, with the PCE value (η) being 3.76%. The J SC value under AM1.5 G conditions is similar to that (20 mA·cm−2) determined from the EQE spectrum; this also confirms that quantum confinement was maintained in the QD solids (Fig. 6B). Finally, a histogram of the performance distribution of the fabricated devices is shown in Fig. S20.

Figure 6
Figure 6

(A) JV curves obtained under AM1.5G illumination and (B) EQE spectra of solar cells with PbS QD heterojunction with graded architecture and having the structure glass/FTO/TiO2/PbS-PbI3_MPA/PbS-MPA/MoOx/Au/Ag, which was formed by spray deposition.

In conclusion, a high-quality PbS QD ink was synthesized successfully via the solution-phase ligand-exchange process while employing MAPbI3 as the precursor. In the colloidal form, the PbS QD ink is stabilized by both the PbI3 anions and the MA cations, with an electrical double layer being formed, resulting in the colloids remaining stable for months. On the other hand, the film fabrication process removes the volatile MA cations. Supersonic spray coating using a QD ink is thus an economically viable approach for the commercial manufacturing of solution-processed PbS QD solar cells while allowing for efficient thickness control and ensuring minimal PbS precursor consumption. In the PbS QD solids, the PbI3 ligands act as surface ligands as well as dopants, resulting in n-type behavior; treatment with MPA leads to a change in the doping polarity of the upper region of the films to p-type, leading to the formation of a structure with a graded architecture. The solar cells fabricated using the PbS QD ink exhibited a PCE value of 3.7%.



Lead (II) oxide (Aldrich, 99.999%), oleic acid (OA, Alfa Aesar, 99%), 1-octadecene (ODE, Aldrich, 90%), TMS2S (Aldrich, 99.999%), methylammonium iodide (MAI, Aldrich, 98%), lead iodide (Aldrich, 99%), NMF (Aldrich, 99%), PC (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.7%), tetrachloroethylene (TCE, Aldrich, ≥99%), titanium(IV) N-butoxide (Aldrich, 97%), triethanolamine (Sigma, ≥99.0%), zirconium ethoxide (Aldrich, 97%), and acetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99.99%) were the materials used in this study.

Synthesis of oleate-passivated PbS QDs

All the manipulations were performed using the standard Schlenk line techniques. In a typical synthesis process, lead oxide (0.46 g, 2 mmol), OA (1.5 mL, 4.5 mmol), and ODE (10 mL) were mixed in a three-neck flask, degassed under vacuum, and heated to 110 °C for 2 h. Thereafter, the flask was heated to 115 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere. Next, TMS2S (210 µL, 1 mmol) in 4 mL of ODE was loaded into a syringe in a nitrogen-filled glove box and rapidly injected into the solution at 110 °C after removing the mantle. Next, the flask was transferred to a glove box, and acetone was added to the reaction solution to isolate the PbS QDs by precipitation. The resulting precipitate was washed twice with acetone to remove the residual surfactant and reaction debris and was then dispersed in octane at a concentration of 100 mg·mL−1 for use in the solution-state ligand-exchange process.

Ligand-exchange process (synthesis of PbS QD ink)

The ligand-exchange process was performed as per a previously reported procedure16. In a nitrogen atmosphere, a solution of 1.58 g (10 mmol) of MAI and 4.61 g (10 mmol) of PbI2 in 10 mL of NMF was stirred for 30 min at 80 °C until all the ingredients had dissolved completely. The ligand solution was then mixed with 5 mL of a hexane solution of the PbS QDs capped with oleate ligands in a vial. The biphasic solution was stirred for approximately 30 min at 100 °C until all the PbS QDs had migrated from the octane phase to the NMF phase. The nonpolar octane phase was removed and the polar PbS QDs in the NMF phase were rinsed thrice with pure hexane. To remove the excess PbMAI3 ligands, the PbS QDs were precipitated by adding acetone and then redispersed in PC.

Supersonic spray deposition

Figure 3(A) illustrates the entrainment of the PbS precursor droplets from the ultrasonic atomizer and their subsequent injection into the supersonic gas stream emanating from the supersonic nozzle. Once the PbS liquid droplets were injected into the supersonic stream, the droplets underwent secondary fragmentation because of the severe drag experienced by them because of the high-speed gas. Owing to this secondary fragmentation, the solvent evaporated rapidly, and only the dried residuals were deposited onto the substrate. The supersonic stream was obtained by using a high chamber pressure (4 bar) and heating the gas to 250 °C; this energy was converted into kinetic energy by the converging/diverging supersonic nozzle. Details of the supersonic spray-deposition process are given in our previous publications26,27,28. The PbS QD precursor was supplied to the atomizer at a flow rate of 2 mL·min−1 and atomized. In the case of a single supersonic nozzle with a diameter of 2 mm, 10 spraying passes/sweeps were required to deposit a 200-nm-thick film with an area of 2.5 × 2.5 cm2. The duration of each spraying pass was 4 s; therefore, the total amount of solvent used to fabricate a single film with an area of 2.5 × 2.5 cm2 and thickness of 200 nm using the precursor solution with a concentration of 3 mg·mL−1 was 1.3 mL. The deposition is a series of successive passes and there are no pauses in between during the spray coating.

Preparation of TiO2 films

Prior to the fabrication of the heterojunction solar cells, the FTO-coated glass substrates were cleaned in a sonication bath using a mixture of acetone, methanol, and deionized water. The Zr-doped TiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized using a previously documented non-hydrolytic sol-gel method32. The prepared Zr-doped TiO2 nanoparticles were spun onto the patterned FTO substrates by placing 20 drops of the Ti-sols and spin-coating at 2500 rpm for 15 s. The resulting films were annealed at 450 °C for 30 min.

Fabrication of PbS QD ink solar cells

The PbS QD ink was deposited onto the TiO2/FTO/glass substrates via supersonic spray coating, as mentioned above. Next, 5 drops of a solution of MPA in methanol in a concentration of 1 vol% were placed onto the PbS QD ink films and spin-coated at 2500 rpm for 10 s. This was followed by the spin-coating of 10 drops of pure methanol at 2500 rpm for 30 s. Subsequently, MoO3 (15 nm), Au (50 nm), and Ag (100 nm) electrodes were formed by thermal evaporation (<10−7 Torr) on the MPA-treated QD films using a shadow mask.

Optical characterization of QDs

The absorption measurements were performed using a Thermo Scientific EVOLUTION 201 spectrophotometer. The PL data were collected using a high-power Xe light source (HPX-2000, optical power >150 mW for visible range, 785 nm spectrum stabilized, laser module power >350 mW for IR range) and detector (Maya 2000 Pro for visible range, NIR Quest for IR range). The DLS measurements for particle size analysis were performed with a NANOPHOX (NX0046) spectrometer.

Structural characterization of QDs (TEM and XRD analyses)

Electron micrographs of the QDs were obtained on a carbon-coated Cu mesh grid using a Tecnai F30 Super-Twin system (FEI Co., Hillsboro, OR, USA; Yun-Chang Park, KAIST NanoFab). The XRD patterns were obtained using a Rigaku Ultima III diffractometer equipped with a rotating anode and a Cu-Kα radiation source (λ = 0.15418 nm).

Photoemission spectroscopy measurements (XPS and UPS analyses)

The base pressure of the analysis chamber for the spectroscopic measurements was kept at less than 10−10 Torr. The UPS and XPS measurements were performed using a hemispherical electron energy analyzer with a charge-coupled device camera (SES-100, VG-Scineta). The UPS measurements used a HeI (hω = 21.22 eV) gas discharge lamp as the excitation source, with the sample bias for the secondary electron cut-off region being −10 V. The XPS measurements used an Al-Kα (hω = 1486.5 eV) radiation source without a monochromator. The energy resolutions were 0.1 and 1.0 eV, respectively.

Device characterization

The current-voltage curves of the fabricated devices were recorded using a Keithley 2400 source meter. A solar simulator (94023 A, New port INC) with a 450 W Xe lamp as the light source and operating at 100 mW·cm−2, as calibrated using a standard silicon solar cell, was employed to simulate the solar spectrum under AM1.5G conditions. The pre-sweep delay time was 1 s and the dwell time for each voltage step was 200 ms. A total of 40 data points were measured between −0.1 and 0.70 V in both the forward and the reverse direction. The EQE measurements were performed using a custom-built set-up (SPIQE200-5327, Newport INC) comprising a 300 W Xe lamp, a power supply, a monochromator with a bandwidth of 20 nm, and a Merlin lock-in amplifier. A beam with an area of 0.01 cm2 was used to excite the solar devices with an active area of 0.03 cm2. All the current-voltage and EQE measurements were performed in a glove box filled with nitrogen.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Konstantatos, G. et al. Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors. Nature 442, 180–183 (2006).

  2. 2.

    Keuleyan, S., Lhuillier, E., Brajuskovic, V. & Guyot-Sionnest, P. Mid-infrared HgTe colloidal quantum dot photodetectors. Nat. Photon. 5, 489–493 (2011).

  3. 3.

    Rhee, J. H., Chung, C.-C. & Diau, E. W.-G. A perspective of mesoscopic solar cells based on metal chalcogenide quantum dots and organometal-halide perovskites. NPG Asia Mater. 5, e68 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Choi, H. et al. High performance of PbSe/PbS core/shell quantum dot heterojunction solar cells: short circuit current enhancement without the loss of open circuit voltage by shell thickness control. Nanoscale 7, 17473–17481 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Baek, S.-W. et al. A Resonance‐shifting hybrid n‐type layer for boosting near‐infrared response in highly efficient colloidal quantum dots solar cells. Adv. Mater 27, 8102–8108 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Lan, X. et al. 10.6% certified colloidal quantum dot solar cells via solvent-polarity-engineered halide passivation. Nano Lett. 16, 4630–4634 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Talapin, D. V. & Murray, C. B. PbSe nanocrystal solids for n-and p-channel thin film field-effect transistors. Science 310, 86–89 (2005).

  8. 8.

    Crisp, R. W. et al. Metal halide solid-state surface treatment for high efficiency PbS and PbSe QD solar cells. Sci. Rep. 5 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Ning, Z., Dong, H., Zhang, Q., Voznyy, O. & Sargent, E. H. Solar cells based on inks of n-type colloidal quantum dots. ACS nano 8, 10321–10327 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Sayevich, V. et al. Stable dispersion of iodide-capped PbSe quantum dots for high-performance low-temperature processed electronics and optoelectronics. Chem. Mater 27, 4328–4337 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Zhang, H., Jang, J., Liu, W. & Talapin, D. V. Colloidal nanocrystals with inorganic halide, pseudohalide, and halometallate ligands. ACS Nano 8, 7359–7369 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Girotto, C., Rand, B. P., Steudel, S., Genoe, J. & Heremans, P. Nanoparticle-based, spray-coated silver top contacts for efficient polymer solar cells. Org. Electron 10, 735–740 (2009).

  13. 13.

    Kramer, I. J. et al. Efficient spray‐coated colloidal quantum dot solar cells. Adv. Mater 27, 116–121 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Park, D., Aqoma, H., Ryu, I., Yim, S. & Jang, S.-Y. PbS/ZnO heterojunction colloidal quantum dot photovoltaic devices by a room temperature air-spray method. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron 22, 1–6 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Kim, S. et al. One-step deposition of photovoltaic layers using iodide terminated PbS quantum dots. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 4002–4007 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Dirin, D. N. et al. Lead halide perovskites and other metal halide complexes as inorganic capping ligands for colloidal nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6550–6553 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Reinhart, C. C. & Johansson, E. Colloidally Prepared 3-mercaptopropionic acid capped lead sulfide quantum dots. Chem. Mater 27, 7313–7320 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Kim, J. Y. et al. Single-step fabrication of quantum funnels via centrifugal colloidal casting of nanoparticle films. Nat. Commun. 6, 7772 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Jiang, C., Lee, J.-S. & Talapin, D. V. Soluble precursors for CuInSe2, CuIn1–xGaxSe2, and Cu2ZnSn(S, Se)4 based on colloidal nanocrystals and molecular metal chalcogenide surface ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5010–5013 (2012).

  20. 20.

    Fischer, A. et al. Directly deposited quantum dot solids using a colloidally stable nanoparticle ink. Adv. Mater 25, 5742–5749 (2013).

  21. 21.

    Choi, H., Ko, J.-H., Kim, Y.-H. & Jeong, S. Steric-hindrance-driven shape transition in PbS quantum dots: understanding size-dependent stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5278–5281 (2013).

  22. 22.

    van der Zande, B. M., Dhont, J. K., Böhmer, M. R. & Philipse, A. P. Colloidal dispersions of gold rods characterized by dynamic light scattering and electrophoresis. Langmuir 16, 459–464 (2000).

  23. 23.

    Woo, J. Y. et al. Ultrastable PbSe nanocrystal quantum dots via in situ formation of atomically thin halide adlayers on PbSe (100). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 8883–8886 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Bae, W. K. et al. Highly effective surface passivation of PbSe quantum dots through reaction with molecular chlorine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 20160–20168 (2012).

  25. 25.

    Kim, S. et al. Air-stable and efficient PbSe quantum-dot solar cells based upon ZnSe to PbSe cation-exchanged quantum dots. ACS Nano 9, 8157–8164 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Lee, J.-G. et al. Supersonically blown nylon-6 nanofibers entangled with graphene flakes for water purification. Nanoscale 7, 19027–19035 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Lee, J.-G. et al. Scalable binder-free supersonic cold spraying of nanotextured cupric oxide (CuO) films as efficient photocathodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 22, 15406–15414 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Kim, D. Y. et al. Self‐healing reduced graphene oxide films by supersonic kinetic spraying. Adv. Funct. Mater 24, 4986–4995 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Kim, T. G., Choi, H., Jeong, S. & Kim, J. W. Electronic structure of PbS colloidal quantum dots on indium tin oxide and titanium oxide. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 27884–27889 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Zhang, W. et al. Enhanced optoelectronic quality of perovskite thin films with hypophosphorous acid for planar heterojunction solar cells. Nat. Commun. 6 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Tejeda, J., Cardona, M., Shevchik, N., Langer, D. & Schönherr, E. Photoelectric properties of Mg2Si, Mg2Ge, and Mg2Sn I. X‐Ray Excitation. Phys. Status Solidi B 58, 189200 (1973).

  32. 32.

    Liu, H. et al. Electron acceptor materials engineering in colloidal quantum dot solar cells. Adv. Mater 23, 3832–3837 (2011).

Download references


This work was supported by the NRF grant funded by the MSIP (NRF-2016R1A2B3014182), the Global R&D program (1415134409) funded by KIAT, and the Global Frontier R&D program by the Center for Multiscale Energy Systems (2011-0031566).

Author information


  1. Nano-Mechanical Systems Research Division, Korea institute of Machinery and Materials (KIMM), Daejeon, 34103, Korea

    • Hyekyoung Choi
    • , Xuan Dung Mai
    •  & Sohee Jeong
  2. Korea University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon, 34113, Korea

    • Hyekyoung Choi
    •  & Sohee Jeong
  3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Korea

    • Jong-Gun Lee
    •  & Sam S. Yoon
  4. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, 80401, United States

    • Matthew C. Beard


  1. Search for Hyekyoung Choi in:

  2. Search for Jong-Gun Lee in:

  3. Search for Xuan Dung Mai in:

  4. Search for Matthew C. Beard in:

  5. Search for Sam S. Yoon in:

  6. Search for Sohee Jeong in:


H.C., X.D.M., and S.J. conceived the idea and design the experiment. H.C. synthesized QD inks, fabricate the photovoltaic device, conducted materials characterization, and device performance analysis. J.-G.L. carried out spray deposition and created conductive QD films with high completeness. H.C., J.G.L., S.S.Y., M.C.B., and S.J. discussed the results and co-wrote the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sam S. Yoon or Sohee Jeong.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history





Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.