Article | Open | Published:

Detection of dietetically absorbed maize-derived microRNAs in pigs

Scientific Reportsvolume 7, Article number: 645 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

MicroRNAs are a class of small RNAs that are important in post-transcriptional gene regulation in animals and plants. These single-stranded molecules are widely distributed in organisms and influence fundamental biological processes. Interestingly, recent studies have reported that diet-derived plant miRNAs could regulate mammalian gene expression, and these studies have broadened our view of cross-kingdom communication. In the present study, we evaluated miRNA levels in cooked maize-containing chow diets, and found that plant miRNAs were resistant to the harsh cooking conditions to a certain extent. After feeding fresh maize to pigs (7 days), maize-derived miRNAs could be detected in porcine tissues and serum, and the authenticity of these plant miRNAs was confirmed by using oxidization reactions. Furthermore, in vivo and in vitro experiments demonstrated that dietary maize miRNAs could cross the gastrointestinal tract and enter the porcine bloodstream. In the porcine cells, we found that plant miRNAs are very likely to specifically target their endogenous porcine mRNAs and influence gene expression in a fashion similar to that of mammalian miRNAs. Our results indicate that maize-derived miRNAs can cross the gastrointestinal tract and present in pigs, and these exogenous miRNAs have the potential to regulate mammalian gene expression.

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small (18–24 nt) non-coding RNAs that play a critical role in regulating gene expression in animals and plants by binding to target gene transcripts to inhibit their translation or degrade them1, 2. These single-stranded molecules are evolutionarily conserved among many species, and influence fundamental biological processes including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, immune responses, and metabolism1, 3,4,5,6,7. miRNAs are widely distributed in mammalian tissues, and their aberrant expression has been associated with numerous diseases6, 8, 9. Recently, it has been widely reported that miRNAs can be packed into exosomes (microvesicles) to resist harsh conditions (e.g., RNase and extreme pH) and transferred into neighboring or distant cells to regulate cell function10, 11. Stable miRNAs can be detected in nearly all bodily fluids, including serum, milk, saliva and urine12,13,14,15. Circulating miRNAs are now emerging as a new group of messengers and effectors in intercellular communication, and some of the unique expression patterns of miRNAs reflect various physiological and pathological conditions16, 17.

miRNAs show a high degree of conservation in their sequences and mechanisms of action among different organisms1. Thus, it is possible for miRNAs to mediate cross-kingdom communication. In 2011, Zhang et al. first reported that plant-derived miRNAs could cross the mammalian gastrointestinal (GI) tract into the serum, and demonstrated that plant miR-168a could bind to the mRNA of low-density lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 (LDLRAP1), inhibit the expression of this protein in the liver and decrease the removal of low-density lipoprotein18. Although there is controversy about cross-kingdom regulation by plant miRNAs19,20,21,22,23, subsequent studies strongly support the view that exogenous plant miRNAs, as inter-species mediators, are involved in cross-kingdom regulation24,25,26,27,28,29,30. For example, honeysuckle-derived miR2911 inhibited influenza A viruses24, oral administration of three mammalian miRNAs that were 2′-O-methylated like plant miRNAs reduced the intestinal tumor burden26 and plant miR-159 inhibited breast cancer growth across kingdoms25.

Pig (Sus scrofa), an important livestock species, is emerging as an attractive biomedical model due to it having metabolic features, cardiovascular systems and proportional organ sizes similar to those of human31,32,33. In the modern pig industry, commercial pigs are supplied with starch-rich concentrates mainly consisting of maize (as much as 40% or more)34. In this context, we performed in vivo and in vitro experiments in pigs to clarify whether plant-derived miRNAs can be absorbed by mammals and mediate cross-kingdom communication.

Results

Identification of abundant miRNAs in fresh maize and chow diets

We used small RNA-seq to reveal the miRNA abundance in fresh maize and observed that the majority of miRNAs with abundant counts were represented by a few miRNAs. The miRNA transcriptome of fresh maize consisted of unevenly distributed sequence counts, among which the top seven miRNAs with the highest expression levels accounted for 85.53% (by reads) of the total reads of all 124 miRNAs (Supplementary Table S1). The abundance of 18 representative miRNAs (10 miRNAs from 80,000–4,000 reads; 2 miRNAs from 2,000–1,000 reads; 2 miRNAs from 400–100 reads; 2 miRNAs from 100–10 reads; 2 miRNAs from 9–1 reads) in fresh maize was analyzed using a qRT-PCR approach (Supplementary Table S2), which showed a significant positive correlation with the quantitative analysis by small RNA-seq (Pearson’s r = 0.89, P = 7.19 × 10−7), demonstrating the high quality and reliability of our small RNA-seq data (Supplementary Fig. S1).

We next sought to evaluate the concentration of maize miRNAs in cooked maize-containing chow diets (typically steamed, dried and puffed maize). Similar to previous studies on rice and honeysuckle18, 24, the plant miRNAs were resistant to the harsh cooking conditions to a certain extent. All 18 maize miRNAs were detected in diverse maize-containing chow diets, even after the harsh puffing treatment (i.e. high temperature and pressure, and apparent starch dextrinization and protein denaturation)35, 36, although their concentrations were decreased to one-thirtieth compared with those in fresh maize (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Identification of abundant miRNAs in fresh maize and chow diets. The average plant miRNA concentrations in cooked maize-containing chow diets, including fresh, steamed, dried and puffed maize, were evaluated by q-PCR (n = 3).

Maize miRNAs are present in porcine nonsolid (blood) and solid tissues

To assess the survival of exogenous maize miRNAs in pigs, we measured the relative expression levels of 18 maize miRNAs in nonsolid (blood) and solid tissues of three adult female pigs, which were given fresh maize feed and water ad libitum for 7 days, by qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S2A, 16 of the 18 selected maize miRNAs were detected in serum and solid tissues, and exhibited relatively low abundance in pancreatic and longissimus dorsi muscle tissues (Fig. 2A). The terminal nucleotide of plant miRNAs has a 2′-O-methyl modification to resist periodate oxidation, but mammalian miRNAs with free 2′ and 3′ hydroxyls are sensitive to periodate37. Hence, oxidization of the nucleotides by periodate can determine whether the plant miRNAs identified in pig were genuine plant miRNAs. We thus treated the total small RNAs isolated from serum and solid tissues with sodium periodate (an oxidizing agent). Consequently, while the endogenous porcine miRNAs (ssc-miR-16, ssc-miR-24 and ssc-miR-25) were completely degraded (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Fig. S2B,C), the maize-derived miRNAs (zma-miR164a-5p, zma-miR167e-5p, zma-miR168a-5p, zma-miR319a-3p and zma-miR408a-3p) exhibited similar abundance to synthetic miRNA with 2′-O-methylated 3′ ends, implying resistance to periodate oxidation, and thus were bona fide plant miRNAs (Fig. 2C–G).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Maize miRNAs are present in porcine nonsolid (blood) and solid tissues. (A) The relative expression levels (miRNA/18S, 5S, U6) of 18 plant miRNAs in 12 porcine tissues were detected by qRT-PCR (n = 3). Data were normalized to the levels of porcine 18S, 5S and U6, and then plotted relative to the highest levels in the tissues. (B–G) Equal amounts of synthetic plant and porcine small RNAs (with or without 2′-O-methylated 3′ ends) and total small RNAs isolated from fresh maize, porcine serum and tissues were treated with/without sodium periodate. After the reactions, the endogenous (B) and plant (C–G) miRNA levels were detected by qRT-PCR assay. The pigs were fed with fresh maize for 7 days. Data were normalized to the miRNA levels of unoxidized samples (n = 3).

Assessing the absorption of exogenous miRNA in the intestine using an ex vivo everted gut sac

We next sought to assess the absorption of exogenous miRNA in the small intestine using the everted gut sac method (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. S3) because it is an important prerequisite for the hypothesis that diet-derived plant miRNAs are taken up by the GI epithelial cells and enter the circulation18, 38. We observed detectably increased concentrations of miRNAs derived from fresh maize juice and synthetic miRNAs with 2′-O-methyl modification in the internal liquid of the intestine (Fig. 3B–G), which suggested that the exogenous plant miRNAs in food could cross the intestinal barrier, although an in vivo test was required to further explore the mechanism by which these exogenous miRNAs subsequently enter the blood and solid tissues.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Assessing the absorption of exogenous miRNA in the intestine using an ex vivo everted gut sac. (A) The everted gut sac method was used to evaluate the absorption of plant miRNAs in the small intestine. An everted porcine gut sac was ligated and placed in synthetic miRNA or fresh maize juice solution, the medium was gassed by bubbling at 37 °C with 95% O2 and 5% CO2, and the liquid in the internal capsule was collected at different times. (B–G) The levels of plant miRNAs in the collected fluid of the internal capsule after the gut sac had been placed in fresh maize juice (B–D) or synthetic miRNA (E–G) solution. After 0, 0.5, 1 and 2 h, zma-miR164a-5p (B, E) (n = 12), zma-miR167e-5p (C, F) (n = 9) and zma-miR168a-5p (D, G) (n = 9) levels were evaluated by qRT-PCR. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05).

Dietetically absorbed maize miRNAs may be packaged into exosomes and present in the circulation

Our findings proved that the exogenous plant miRNAs in food could cross the intestinal barrier in vitro. Therefore, we sought to investigate the absorption of plant miRNAs in vivo and assessed the levels of maize-derived miRNAs in the serum of pigs fed fresh maize. As shown in Fig. 4A–E, the levels of all five tested maize miRNAs (zma-miR164a-5p, zma-miR166a-3p, zma-miR167e-5p, zma-miR168a-5p and zma-miR319a-3p) gradually increased after one meal of fresh maize, reaching peak values at 6 or 12 hours within the first 24 hours. Following 7 days of access to fresh maize feed ad libitum, the maize miRNAs maintained a stable detectable level in the serum (Fig. 4A–E). We next assessed whether these plant miRNAs were located in exosomes in porcine serum by performing ultracentrifugation. All five tested maize miRNAs detected in the serum were primarily present in serum exosomes (~58.2% of the concentration in the serum) (Fig. 4F). Direct PCR-Sanger sequencing confirmed the specificity of our qRT-PCR measurements (Supplementary Table S3)39. This result supported the hypothesis that ingested plant miRNAs are taken up by the GI tract and subsequently packaged into exosomes, so as to escape nucleases in cellular compartments and in the bloodstream18, 25.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Dietetically absorbed maize miRNAs may be packaged into exosomes and present in the circulation. (A–E) The levels of zma-miR164a-5p (A), zma-miR166a-3p (B), zma-miR167e-5p (C), zma-miR168a-5p (D) and zma-miR319a-3p (E) in porcine serum following one feeding with 1 kg of fresh maize (n = 6); after 24 h, the pigs were fed a fresh maize diet for 7 days. The miRNA levels were evaluated by qRT-PCR, and porcine serum was collected after overnight fasting as a control (0 h). (F) The levels of plant miRNAs detected by qRT-PCR in exosomes isolated from porcine serum by ultracentrifugation (n = 3). Data were normalized to the miRNA levels of serum containing exosomes.

Possible cross-kingdom regulation of target porcine mRNAs by maize miRNAs

To confirm earlier findings that exogenous plant miRNAs in food can specifically bind target mammalian mRNAs and influence biological processes18, 24, 25, we first performed an in silico analysis of the porcine target genes for zma-miR164a-5p, which exhibited a relatively high level in porcine blood and tissues. We predicted 50 potential target porcine mRNAs for zma-miR164a-5p that had a low minimum free energy value (mfe< −25 kcal·mol−1) and for which the seed region was highly matched (Supplementary Table S4). Next, the MirTrap System, an RNA-induced silencing complex trap method40, 41, was used to isolate specific miRNA target genes in a porcine kidney cell line (PK15). As shown in Fig. 5A–O, of 15 potential zma-miR164a-5p targets analyzed by qRT-PCR, transcripts for 73.33% (11 of 15) were significantly increased, and 53.33% (8 of 15) showed greater than 2-fold enrichment versus the control, which was regarded as a positive result41. In addition, we performed a dual-luciferase assay to demonstrate the relationships between zma-miR164a-5p and three of its potential target genes (CSPG4, OTX1 and PLAGL2) (Fig. 5P). In the three target gene binding sites, zma-miR164a-5p significantly reduced the luciferase activity for wild-type target genes, whereas mutant-type target genes were not affected by transfection with zma-miR164a-5p (Fig. 5Q). These results suggested that dietetically absorbed maize miRNAs are very likely to specifically target endogenous porcine mRNAs and influence gene expression in a fashion similar to mammalian miRNAs.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Possible cross-kingdom regulation of target porcine mRNAs by maize miRNAs. (A–O) Potential target genes of zma-miR164a-5p were captured in a porcine kidney cell line (PK15) using the MirTrap System. The fold enrichment and statistical significance of the potential target genes were identified by qRT-PCR (n = 3). (P) Diagram of the putative zma-miR164a-5p binding sites in OTX1, PLAGL2 and CSPG4, and luciferase reporter plasmids containing wild-type (WT) or mutant (MUT) putative zma-miR164a-5p target sites. Paired bases are indicated by black vertical lines and mispairing is indicated by two dots. (Q) Luciferase activity in the porcine kidney cell line (PK15) co-transfected with zma-miR164a-5p or negative control oligos and the reporter constructs from (P) (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05).

Discussion

In the past few years, studies in mammals of circulating miRNAs originating from other species have broadened our view of cross-kingdom gene regulation42, 43, but the findings are still controversial because of potential contamination, undetectable abundance and irreproducible results20, 22, 23. In the present study, in vivo and in vitro experiments were performed using diverse and strict methods. After consumption of a fresh maize diet, we found that most maize-derived miRNAs (16 of 18 selected miRNAs) could be detected in porcine tissues, and the plant miRNA concentration in porcine serum was enhanced after feeding on fresh maize. These results are consistent with most previous studies describing that diet-derived plant miRNAs can be detected in other organisms24,25,26,27,28,29,30, 39.

Many factors including different physiological and pathological conditions could affect the digestion and absorption of food in the GI tract28, 44, 45. Yang et al. reported that particular diets and/or alterations in intestinal permeability could improve the capacity to absorb small RNAs from the diet28. The everted gut sac model is an efficient tool for maintaining normal physiological function of the intestines to study in vitro drug absorption and interaction, intestinal metabolism, and the roles of transporters and enzymes46, 47. The present experiment using an ex vivo everted gut sac supported the assertion that exogenous plant miRNAs can pass through the GI tract. In addition, we further confirmed the authenticity of these plant miRNAs in pigs and the specificity of our qRT-PCR measurements for them by performing a periodate oxidation assay and direct PCR-Sanger sequencing. Taken together, all of our evidence indicated that exogenous plant miRNAs can cross the GI tract and are present in mammals.

Recently, it has been reported that exogenous plant miRNAs can target mammalian mRNAs to regulate the expression of target genes and influence related biological processes18, 24, 25. In view of our evidence that dietary plant miRNAs can enter porcine blood and tissues through food intake, a variety of mRNAs might be targeted and affected by exogenous dietary plant miRNAs in different organisms. Interestingly, evidence from the miR-TRAP approach showed that zma-miR164a-5p could exert the same function as endogenous miRNAs in porcine cells and target some of its predicted target genes in the Argonaute/RISC complex. Furthermore, the luciferase reporter assays further confirmed that plant miRNAs could bind to their potential target genes’ binding sites and influence gene expression.

Despite evidence from in vitro studies indicating that exogenous plant miRNAs have the potential to regulate host gene expression, further work is needed to determine the levels that they need to reach to exert their effects in other organisms39. The current study showed that is invalidation when miRNA expression under a threshold concentration (<100 copies per cell)48. Zhou et al. reported that a high concentration (>100 copies per cell) of exogenous honeysuckle miR2911 in mouse could inhibit H1N1 to suppress viral infection24; nonetheless, most exogenous diet-derived miRNAs may be not reached the threshold concentration in host organisms20, 21, 30, 39. However, dietary customs are the long-term process for most organisms, such as herbivores or vegetarians, whose staple foods, such as grains, herbs, fruit and vegetables, are all rich in plant miRNAs21, 24, 49. Chin et al. reported that long-term oral miR159 ingestion suppressed breast tumor growth25, while Sizolwenkosi et al. reported that long-term oral administration of three mammalian miRNAs that were 2′-O-methylated like plant miRNAs reduced mouse intestinal tumor burden in vivo 26. Although these two studies did not clearly indicate the concentrations of these exogenous miRNAs in the mouse body, the long-term effect of dietary miRNAs needs to be considered in further analysis. Considering the potential effect diet-derived miRNAs might have on cross-kingdom communication, more definitive evidence on the mechanisms of absorption and action of exogenous plant miRNAs needs to be provided in future studies, and exciting avenues of plant miRNA-associated physiological and pathological effects could be demonstrated in the future.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

All research involving animals was conducted according to the guidelines established by the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology, China; revised in June 2004) and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, China, under permit No. DKY-S20143117.


Small RNA sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from fresh maize using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and small RNAs were purified from PAGE gels. Illumina sequencing of small RNA samples was performed by BGI (Shenzhen, China). After removing the adaptor sequences from the raw data, the clean reads were compared to known mature maize miRNAs from the miRBase database (http://www.mirbase.org/index.shtml) to identify maize miRNAs.


Maize processing

Fresh maize was bought from a Chinese farmers’ market. It was boiled in water at 100 °C for 20 minutes to obtain steamed maize; meanwhile, fresh maize was treated at 140 °C for 3 hours and 65 °C for 36 hours to obtain dried maize. Puffed maize (HAHNE, Germany) was bought from a Chinese supermarket. All different products of maize were treated with Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen) and isolated small RNA was evaluated by qRT-PCR.


Animals and diets

Jinhua female pigs were sacrificed after consuming a fresh maize diet for 7 days. Pigs were stunned by electronarcosis; then, porcine blood and tissues were collected immediately after sacrifice, and serum was obtained by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 15 minutes. In a separate experiment, female pigs were fed one meal with fresh maize (1 kg/pig) after fasting overnight. After a fixed time interval (i.e. 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h), serum was collected from a vein in the forearm, from which total RNA was extracted. After 24 hours, pigs were provided with a fresh maize diet ad libitum, and serum was collected at 1, 3 and 7 days. Pigs were sacrificed after the last serum collection, after which tissues were collected immediately. All tissues and body fluid samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until analysis.


Cells, reagents and oligos

The porcine kidney cell line (PK15) was obtained from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) and maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Synthetic miRNA molecules (with or without a 2′-O-methyl-modified terminal nucleotide) were purchased from RiboBio (Guangzhou, China). Stem-loop qRT-PCR primers were obtained from RiboBio and the other primers were purchased from BGI (Supplementary Tables S5 and S6).


Exosomes purification from serum

Exosomes were isolated from porcine serum by differential centrifugation according to previous studies with slight modifications50. Porcine blood was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 15 minutes in a tabletop centrifuge at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected, diluted with sterile PBS at a 1:1 ratio, and then centrifuged at 1,200 g for 20 minutes, followed by 10,000 g for 30 minutes in a centrifuge at 4 °C to remove cellular debris. The supernatants were then filtered using a 0.22-µm filter (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA) and centrifuged at 110,000 g for 2 h at 4 °C in an LE-80 ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Palo Alto, CA, USA), to pellet the exosomes. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in PBS (100 µl).


RNA extraction and qRT-PCR

Total RNA from the serum, exosomes, cells, or tissues was obtained using Trizol Reagent or Trizol LS Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and each sample was eluted in 30 μl of RNase-free water (Takara, Dalian, China). All reverse transcription of miRNA from maize and Jinhua sow samples was performed using the One Step PrimeScript®miRNA cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara) according to manufacturer’s instructions, and qPCR was performed using SsoAdvanced™ SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). Stem-loop qRT-PCR was used to evaluate the miRNA level using the Bulge-LoopTM miRNA qRT-PCR Starter Kit (RiboBio) according to manufacturer’s instructions, and the reverse transcription and qPCR primers were also synthesized by RiboBio. Meanwhile, mRNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using PrimeScript® 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara) and qPCR was performed using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq KitTM II (Takara) and Bio-Rad CFX96TM Real-Time PCR Systems (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). All reactions were performed in triplicate, and the absolute or relative expression levels of the target miRNAs and mRNAs were calculated as needed.


Oxidation of small RNAs with periodate

Total RNA of the fresh maize or porcine tissues and serum was extracted using Trizol Reagent or Trizol LS Reagent (Invitrogen), and synthetic ssc-miR-16, zma-miR164a-5p, zma-miR167e-5p, zma-miR168a-5p, zma-miR319a-3p and zma-miR-408a-3p (with or without 2′-O-methyl) were obtained from RiboBio. Next, 10 μl of total RNA or synthetic miRNA was mixed with 10 μl of NaIO4 (0.25 M) and 80 μl of RNase-free water, and incubated at 0 °C for 40 min in the dark. In the unoxidized group, 10 μl of RNase-free water was used to instead of 10 μl of NaIO4. Next, the RNA was precipitated, air-dried, dissolved in RNase-free water, and then assayed by stem-loop qRT-PCR via the same procedure as described above.


The ex vivo everted gut sac method

The ex vivo everted gut sac method was performed as previously described with slight modifications to assess the absorption of exogenous miRNA in the small intestine46, 47. Briefly, the small intestine (10 cm) was collected and flushed through several times with saline solution (0.9% NaCl) at room temperature. The gut was immediately placed in Tyrode’s solution and the medium was gassed by bubbling at 37 °C with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. As shown in Fig. 3A, the gut was everted gently and ligated at one end, while the other end was connected to a collection tool. Then, 300 pmol synthetic miRNAs (with a 2′-O-methyl-modified terminal nucleotide) or 10% fresh maize juice was dissolved in Tyrode’s solution of external capsule. After the indicated time points (0, 0.5, 1 and 2 h), the fluid in the internal sac (250 µl) was collected to extract total RNA and the miRNA level was evaluated by stem-loop qRT-PCR.


T-A cloning and Sanger sequencing

Total RNA from porcine serum and tissues was obtained using Trizol Reagent or Trizol LS Reagent. Small RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA and stem-loop PCR was performed using Bulge-LoopTM miRNA qRT-PCR Starter Kit (RiboBio); the A-tailing was added using DNA A-Tailing Kit (Takara). Next, the products were cloned into the pMD19-T vector (Takara) and around 40 monoclonals were randomly picked for each miRNA. Then, Sanger sequencing with the M13 primer was used to determine the sequences of the PCR products.


Mir-Trap System

To capture mRNAs targeted by zma-miR164a-5p, the specific microRNA targets in mammalian cells were identified using the Mir-Trap System kit (Clontech, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, microRNA was co-transfected into porcine kidney cells (PK15) together with pMirTrap Vector using the Xfect™ MicroRNA Transfection Reagent in combination with Xfect Polymer, followed by incubation for 24 h. Then, the transfected cells were lysed using the MirTrap Isolation Kit and the FLAG-tagged RISC complex (including target mRNAs) was immunoprecipitated using the anti-DYKDDDDK beads from the MirTrap Isolation Kit. The bead-bound target mRNAs were then isolated using the NucleoSpin RNA XS Kit. Furthermore, potential target genes of zma-miR164a-5p in pigs were predicted by TargetScan and NCBI Blast, and the minimum free energy value (mef) was evaluated by RNAhybrid. The isolated RNA was analyzed by qRT-PCR to identify the potential target mRNA of zma-miR164a-5p in porcine cells (Supplementary Table S6).


Dual luciferase reporter assay

Luciferase activity assays involving a dual-luciferase reporter system were performed to evaluate the relationship between zma-miR164a-5p and three of its potential target genes (CSPG4, OTX1 and PLAGL2). In brief, the potentially targeted mRNAs containing zma-miR164a-5p binding sites (wild type or mutant type) were synthesized by Tsingke (China). The sequences were cloned into the SacI and XhoI sites of the pmirGLO plasmid (Promega, USA) at the 3′ end of the firefly luciferase reporter gene. Porcine kidney cells (PK15) were cultured in 24-well plates and when the cells reached about 70% confluence, recombinant pmirGLO vector with wild-type (WT) or mutant (MUT) binding sites was co-transfected with synthetic zma-miR164a-5p or negative control oligos into these cells (Lipofectamine 3000; Invitrogen). Cells were collected after 48 hour, and their dual-luciferase activity was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System kit (Promega, USA).


Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-tests and the differences were considered significant at P <  0.05.

Additional information

Accession codes: The high-throughput sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE87451).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Bartel, D. P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116, 281–297 (2004).

  2. 2.

    Chen, X. Small RNAs in development–insights from plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22, 361–367 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Luo, Y., Guo, Z. & Li, L. Evolutionary conservation of microRNA regulatory programs in plant flower development. Dev Biol 380, 133–144 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Khan, G. A. et al. MicroRNAs as regulators of root development and architecture. Plant Mol Biol 77, 47–58 (2011).

  5. 5.

    Ryazansky, S. S., Mikhaleva, E. A. & Olenkina, O. V. Essential functions of microRNAs in animal reproductive organs. Mol Biol 48, 319–331 (2014).

  6. 6.

    He, L. & Hannon, G. J. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet 5, 522–531 (2004).

  7. 7.

    Waldron, J. A. & Newbury, S. F. The roles of miRNAs in wing imaginal disc development in Drosophila. Biochem Soc Trans 40, 891–895 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Calin, G. A. & Croce, C. M. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 6, 857–866 (2006).

  9. 9.

    Lu, J. et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature 435, 834–838 (2005).

  10. 10.

    Théry, C., Zitvogel, L. & Amigorena, S. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Immunol 2, 569–579 (2002).

  11. 11.

    Valadi, H. et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol 9, 654–659 (2007).

  12. 12.

    Zhou, Q. et al. Immune-related microRNAs are abundant in breast milk exosomes. Int J Biol Sci 8, 118–123 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Szeto, C. C. Urine miRNA in nephrotic syndrome. Clin Chim Acta 436, 308–313 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Yang, Y. et al. Progress risk assessment of oral premalignant lesions with saliva miRNA analysis. BMC Cancer 13, 1–8 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Chen, X. et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res 18, 997–1006 (2008).

  16. 16.

    Ke, Z. & Zhang, C. Y. Circulating MicroRNAs: a novel class of biomarkers to diagnose and monitor human cancers. Med Res Rev 32, 326–348 (2012).

  17. 17.

    Gilad, S. et al. Serum MicroRNAs are promising novel biomarkers. PLoS ONE 3, e3148 (2008).

  18. 18.

    Zhang, L. et al. Exogenous plant MIR168a specifically targets mammalian LDLRAP1: evidence of cross-kingdom regulation by microRNA. Cell Res 22, 107–126 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Tosar, J. P., Rovira, C., Naya, H. & Cayota, A. Mining of public sequencing databases supports a non-dietary origin for putative foreign miRNAs: underestimated effects of contamination in NGS. RNA 20, 754–757 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Witwer, K. W., Mcalexander, M. A., Queen, S. E. & Adams, R. J. Real-time quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR for plant miRNAs in mammalian blood provide little evidence for general uptake of dietary miRNAs: limited evidence for general uptake of dietary plant xenomiRs. RNA Biol 10, 1080–1086 (2013).

  21. 21.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Analysis of plant-derived miRNAs in animal small RNA datasets. BMC Genomics 13, 381 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Snow, J. W., Hale, A. E., Isaacs, S. K., Baggish, A. L. & Chan, S. Y. Ineffective delivery of diet-derived microRNAs to recipient animal organisms. RNA Biol 10, 1107–1116 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Dickinson, B. et al. Lack of detectable oral bioavailability of plant microRNAs after feeding in mice. Nat Biotechnol 31, 965–967 (2013).

  24. 24.

    Zhou, Z. et al. Honeysuckle-encoded atypical microRNA2911 directly targets influenza A viruses. Cell Res 25, 39–49 (2014).

  25. 25.

    Chin, A. R. et al. Cross-kingdom inhibition of breast cancer growth by plant miR159. Cell Res 26, 217–228 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Mlotshwa, S. et al. A novel chemopreventive strategy based on therapeutic microRNAs produced in plants. Cell Res 25, 521–524 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Yang, J., Farmer, L. M., Agyekum, A. A. A., Elbaz-Younes, I. & Hirschi, K. D. Detection of an abundant plant-based small RNA in healthy consumers. PLoS ONE 10, e0137516 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Yang, J., Farmer, L. M., Agyekum, A. A. & Hirschi, K. D. Detection of dietary plant-based small RNAs in animals. Cell Res 25, 517–520 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Lukasik, A. & Zielenkiewicz, P. In silico identification of plant miRNAs in mammalian breast milk exosomes–a small step forward? PLoS ONE 9, e99963 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Liang, H. et al. Effective detection and quantification of dietetically absorbed plant microRNAs in human plasma. J Nutr Biochem 26, 505–512 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Bendixen, E., Danielsen, M., Larsen, K. & Bendixen, C. Advances in porcine genomics and proteomics—a toolbox for developing the pig as a model organism for molecular biomedical research. Brief Funct Genomics 9, 208–219 (2010).

  32. 32.

    Schook, L. et al. Swine in biomedical research: creating the building blocks of animal models. Anim Biotechnol 16, 183–190 (2005).

  33. 33.

    Bellinger, D. A., Merricks, E. P. & Nichols, T. C. Swine models of type 2 diabetes mellitus: insulin resistance, glucose tolerance, and cardiovascular complications. ILAR J 47, 243–258 (2006).

  34. 34.

    National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1999).

  35. 35.

    Liu, Y., Hsieh, F., Heymann, H. & Huff, H. Effect of process conditions on the physical and sensory properties of extruded oat-corn puff. J Food Sci 65, 1253–1259 (2000).

  36. 36.

    Barrett, A. H. & Kaletunc, G. Quantitative description of fracturability changes in puffed corn extrudates affected by sorption of low levels of moisture. Cereal Chem 75, 695–698 (1998).

  37. 37.

    Yu, B. et al. Methylation as a crucial step in plant microRNA biogenesis. Science 307, 932–935 (2005).

  38. 38.

    Borgström, B., Dahlqvist, A., Lundh, G. & Sjövall, J. Studies of intestinal digestion and absorption in the human. J Clin Invest 36, 1521 (1957).

  39. 39.

    Jia, L., Zhang, D., Xiang, Z. & He, N. Nonfunctional ingestion of plant miRNAs in silkworm revealed by digital droplet PCR and transcriptome analysis. Sci Rep 5, 12290 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Cambronne, X. A., Shen, R., Auer, P. L. & Goodman, R. H. Capturing microRNA targets using an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC)-trap approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 20473–20478 (2012).

  41. 41.

    Riccardi, S. et al. MiR-210 promotes sensory hair cell formation in the organ of corti. BMC Genomics 17, 309 (2016).

  42. 42.

    Hirschi, K. D., Pruss, G. J. & Vance, V. Dietary delivery: a new avenue for microRNA therapeutics? Trends Biotechnol 33, 431–432 (2015).

  43. 43.

    Sarkies, P. & Miska, E. A. Is there social RNA? Science 341, 467–468 (2013).

  44. 44.

    Crane, C. W. Some Aspects of Protein Digestion and Absorption in Health and Disease. Postgrad Med J 37, 745–754 (1962).

  45. 45.

    Bourne, R. H., Matzko, A. & Mckenna, R. D. The use of I 131 labeled fat in study of fat digestion and absorption in normal individuals and in patients with diseases of fat absorption. Gastroenterology 32, 17–27 (1957).

  46. 46.

    Alam, M. A., Al‐Jenoobi, F. I. & Al‐mohizea, A. M. Everted gut sac model as a tool in pharmaceutical research: limitations and applications. J Pharm Pharmacol 64, 326–336 (2012).

  47. 47.

    Luo, Z. et al. Ex vivo and in situ approaches used to study intestinal absorption. J Pharmacol Toxicol 68, 208–216 (2013).

  48. 48.

    Brown, B. D., Venneri, M. A., Zingale, A., Sergi, L. S. & Naldini, L. Endogenous microRNA regulation suppresses transgene expression in hematopoietic lineages and enables stable gene transfer. Nat Med 12, 585–591 (2006).

  49. 49.

    Lan, Y. et al. Identification of novel MiRNAs and MiRNA expression profiling during grain development in indica rice. BMC Genomics 13, 264 (2012).

  50. 50.

    Rekker, K. et al. Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods for microRNA profiling. Cli Biochem 47, 135–138 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31472081, 31301942, 31530073 and 31522055), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (2013AA102502), the Key Project of Sichuan Education Department (15ZA0008 and 15ZA0003), the Application Basic Research Plan Project of Sichuan Province (2016JY0167), the National Special Foundation for Transgenic Species of China (2014ZX0800950B and 2014ZX08006-003), the National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals, the Young Scholars of the Yangtze River and the Program for Innovative Research Team of Sichuan Province (2015TD0012).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yi Luo, Pengjun Wang and Xun Wang contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China

    • Yi Luo
    • , Pengjun Wang
    • , Xun Wang
    • , Yuhao Wang
    • , Zhiping Mu
    • , Qingzhi Li
    • , Yuhua Fu
    • , Juan Xiao
    • , Guojun Li
    • , Yao Ma
    • , Long Jin
    • , Jideng Ma
    • , Qianzi Tang
    • , Anan Jiang
    • , Xuewei Li
    •  & Mingzhou Li
  2. Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, 404000, China

    • Zhiping Mu
  3. The Fishery Institute of Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, 611731, China

    • Qingzhi Li
  4. College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China

    • Yuhua Fu
  5. Animal Breeding and Genetics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Animal Science Academy, Chengdu, 610066, China

    • Yiren Gu

Authors

  1. Search for Yi Luo in:

  2. Search for Pengjun Wang in:

  3. Search for Xun Wang in:

  4. Search for Yuhao Wang in:

  5. Search for Zhiping Mu in:

  6. Search for Qingzhi Li in:

  7. Search for Yuhua Fu in:

  8. Search for Juan Xiao in:

  9. Search for Guojun Li in:

  10. Search for Yao Ma in:

  11. Search for Yiren Gu in:

  12. Search for Long Jin in:

  13. Search for Jideng Ma in:

  14. Search for Qianzi Tang in:

  15. Search for Anan Jiang in:

  16. Search for Xuewei Li in:

  17. Search for Mingzhou Li in:

Contributions

Y.L., X.W. and M.L. conceived and designed the study and drafted the manuscript. P.W., Y.W., Z.M., Q.L., J.X., G.L., Y.M. and Y.L. performed the experiments. Y.F., Y.G., L.J., J.M., Q.T., A.J., X.L. and Y.L. analyzed all the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xun Wang or Mingzhou Li.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00488-y

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.