Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Epilepsy-associated GRIN2A mutations reduce NMDA receptor trafficking and agonist potency – molecular profiling and functional rescue


Mutations in the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) gene GRIN2A cause epilepsy-aphasia syndrome (EAS), a spectrum of epileptic, cognitive and language disorders. Using bioinformatic and patient data we shortlisted 10 diverse missense mutations for characterisation. We used high-throughput calcium-flux assays and patch clamp recordings of transiently transfected HEK-293 cells for electrophysiological characterization, and Western blotting and confocal imaging to assay expression and surface trafficking. Mutations P79R, C231Y, G483R and M705V caused a significant reduction in glutamate and glycine agonist potency, whilst D731N was non-responsive. These mutants, along with E714K, also showed significantly decreased total protein levels and trafficking to the cell surface, whilst C436R was not trafficked at all. Crucially this reduced surface expression did not cause the reduced agonist response. We were able to rescue the phenotype of P79R, C231Y, G483R and M705V after treatment with a GluN2A-selective positive allosteric modulator. With our methodology we were not able to identify any functional deficits in mutations I814T, D933N and N976S located between the glutamate-binding domain and C-terminus. We show GRIN2A mutations affect the expression and function of the receptor in different ways. Careful molecular profiling of patients will be essential for future effective personalised treatment options.


The epilepsy-aphasia spectrum (EAS) represents a continuum of genetic epilepsy syndromes with the EEG signature of focal sharp waves, concurrent with various speech and language disorders1, 2. At the mild end is the common childhood disorder of Rolandic epilepsy (RE), frequently associated with speech and oromotor deficits, as well as reading disability, attention, and memory problems3. Focal seizures commonly occur during sleep and the defining electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormality is blunt centrotemporal spikes (CTS) during sleep4. Atypical benign partial epilepsy (ABPE) is much more rare, consisting of more severe seizures as well as some regression of speech, motor skills and attention5. The debilitating disorders of epileptic encephalopathy of continuous spike-and-waves during slow-wave sleep (ECSWS) and Landau-Kleffner syndrome (LKS) represent the more severe, and less-frequent, end of the spectrum. There is catastrophic loss of receptive and expressive language in children who develop LKS and who were, in general, previously cognitively normal. The EEG evolves into continuous spike-and-waves during slow-wave sleep (CSWS)6, with easily controlled Rolandic seizures. In ECSWS, the epilepsy is often refractory to treatment, with multiple seizure types present. Children with ECSWS have global regression across learning, memory, motor and social skills7.

Until relatively recently the aetiology of most EAS disorders was largely unknown, although environmental factors such as thalamic injury can cause the EEG phenotype8. CTS in RE is associated with variants in PAX6-ELP4 on 11p139, 10, and rare mutations and deletions in the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) genes have been reported in families with mental retardation and various epilepsy phenotypes11,12,13,14. In 2013 three groups simultaneously discovered mutations and small deletions of GRIN2A across EAS disorders15,16,17. GRIN2A encodes the GluN2A subunit of the NMDAR, a transmembrane ligand-gated ion channel with a critical role in normal neuronal development, synaptic plasticity and memory. Disturbances of NMDARs are implicated in disorders such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease and represent targets of interest for pharmacological treatments18, 19. NMDARs are hetero-tetramers, usually consisting of two GluN1 and two GluN2 (A-D) subunits, creating many receptor subtypes with distinct properties, functions and expression levels14, 19. NMDARs are activated following the binding of glycine and glutamate to the GluN1 and GluN2 subunits respectively. This then opens the cation-selective pore, allowing intracellular Ca2+ influx when the Mg2+ blockade is removed upon membrane depolarisation. NMDARs consist of four domains: the extracellular amino (N)-terminal domain (NTD) involved in subunit assembly and allosteric modulation, (Fig. 1a), the agonist-binding domain (ABD), the transmembrane domain (TMD), and the intracellular C-terminal domain (CTD) involved in receptor trafficking14.

Figure 1

CADD scores and protein modelling predict stronger functional effects for EAS-associated GRIN2A mutations than in controls. (a) Protein structure model of NMDAR (PDB ID 4TLL): GluN1 (grey and green), GluN2 (B in this structure) (blue and red). Membrane would be horizontal in this image with the NTD and ABD in the extracellular space. Intracellular C-Terminal domain would be below the transmembrane domain (not present in this structure). (b) Schematic linear representation of GluN2A with the domains annotated. Black rectangles indicate transmembrane domains. Plot of scaled CADD scores against GluN2A amino acid position for missense variants. Black dots represent scores for 65/6474 individuals from the Exome Variant Server (EVS) that had missense variants in GRIN2A and coloured symbols are scores for variants found in individuals with EAS disorders. The horizontal dotted line indicates the scaled CADD score cut off of 20 for a highly likely deleterious variant. (c) Protein structure model of the NTD of NMDAR (PDB ID 3QEL): GluN1 (grey), GluN2 (B in this structure) (red). Mutations considered in this domain highlighted (conserved between GluN2A and B). (d) Protein structure model of the LBD of NMDAR (PDB ID 2A5T): GluN1 (grey), GluN2A (blue). Mutations considered in this paper highlighted, as well as agonists.

Here we present an in vitro functional analysis of 10 missense mutations of GRIN2A identified in children with EAS disorders15,16,17. Our studies reveal variable phenotypes ranging from loss of receptor trafficking, through altered agonist potency to total loss of function. We were able to rescue the phenotype of mutations with reduced glutamate potency following treatment with a GluN2A-selective positive allosteric modulator. This work indicates careful molecular analysis of GRIN2A patient mutations is important before starting targeted treatment options.


Bioinformatic analysis and selection of GRIN2A patient mutations

Over 30 GRIN2A missense mutations have been identified in EAS patients15,16,17. We assigned Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) scores20 to these mutations to create predictions of deleteriousness based on measures such as conservation metrics and protein structure. These CADD scores were compared to those for controls from the Exome Variant Server (EVS), (Fig. 1b). All EAS-associated variants apart from N976S are located above the CADD-20 cut off for the 1% most deleterious variants, and 26/31 are located within the NTD, ABD or pore domains. Variants from EVS controls either largely score below CADD-20 or are located within the C-terminus where they are predicted to cause less severe functional effects.

We selected 10 EAS-associated missense mutations for further analysis from different functional domains, with different inheritance patterns (de novo vs inherited and segregating with disease), disease outcomes and a range of CADD scores (Table 1 and Fig. 1). A contribution to the selection of the mutants was hypothesis driven, based on analysis of crystal structures, (Fig. 1c).

Table 1 Summary of clinical and genetic information for studied GRIN2A mutations.

Selected GRIN2A mutations protect against NMDA receptor toxicity

We carried out site-directed mutagenesis in the human GRIN2A cDNA to create the 10 mutation constructs, which were subsequently inserted into the expression plasmid pcDNA3.1(+) before transfection into HEK-293 cells along with GRIN1 in a second pcDNA3.1(+) plasmid. To allow identification of the transfected cells an HA-tag was added to the N-terminus, which did not alter the function of the receptor (Supplementary Fig. 1) and this construct was subsequently called Wild Type (WT).

Free glutamate and glycine in culture media is toxic to HEK cells transfected with NMDAR from direct influx of calcium through the activated channels21. Using a continuous live-cell imaging system we were able to leverage this characteristic to carry out a screen for GluN2A mutant functionality. After 48 hours almost all of the WT GluN2A cells were dead, compared to very few of those co-transfected with the control empty vector and GRIN1, which were spread out and dividing. Some mutants showed an intermediate phenotype (Fig. 2a). Cells transfected with the WT GRIN2A receptor die at an accelerated rate compared to those that are untransfected (UT) or transfected with an empty vector after only 12 hours (Fig. 2b). This indicates the rapid expression and trafficking of the NMDAR to the cell surface, the binding of glutamate present in the media and the subsequent calcium influx and excitotoxicity. Analysis of the GluN2A mutants shows a similar mortality rate to WT for E714K, D933N and N976S indicating similar functionality, (Fig. 2c). All other mutants were significantly different to the WT construct (Dunnett’s corrected AVOVA, p < 0.001). I814T and M705V appear to have an intermediate phenotype, followed by G483R and P79R with less than 75% of cells dying after 48 hours. A level of mortality consistent with cells transfected with the empty vector is shown for C231Y, C436R and D731N.

Figure 2

Selected GRIN2A mutations protect against glutamate-induced toxicity in HEK cells. (a) Superimposed bright field and pseudocolour red images, indicating fluorescent Cytotox Red dye in dead cells, of HEK cells transiently transfected with various GRIN2A mutant constructs, or empty vector. Free glutamate and glycine in the culture media causes cell death in those expressing functional NMDARs over 48 hours. Images captures at 20x using the IncuCyte live-cell imaging system. (b) Representative time course of cell death, normalised to initial confluency in each well, n = 5 wells, Mean ± SEM. (c) Plot of cell mortality for GRIN2A mutants normalised to initial confluency per well. Mutants P79R, C231Y, C436R, G483R, M705V, D731N and I814T are protective against glutamate toxicity either due to reduced trafficking and/or reduced functionality of the receptors. ***p < 0.001 Dunnett’s corrected one-way ANOVA. Averaged data from n = 15 wells per construct except for G483R, E714K, D933N and N976S where n = 12 wells, 3 × 104 cells/well. Mean ± SEM.

GRIN2A mutations can decrease agonist potency

The results of the cell toxicity assay indicated that some mutants potentially alter GluN2A glutamate potency and/or receptor expression. We used fluorescence-based single-cell calcium-flux imaging to investigate agonist pharmacology in more detail in transiently transfected HEK cells22, 23. Four mutants, P79R, C231Y, C483R and M705V significantly decrease glutamate potency (F1,63 = 459.1, F1,55 = 427.3, F1,43 = 987.6 and F1,43 = 160.9 respectively, Bonferroni corrected ANOVA, p < 0.0001), (Fig. 3a–c), as shown by the increase in the half-maximally effective concentration of agonist (EC50) (Table 2). Two mutations, C436R and D731N produced no detectable response to maximal glutamate or glycine, (Fig. 3c,e). Four of the mutations did not alter the response to glutamate, E714K, I814T, D933N and N976S, when compared to WT, (Fig. 3d). The effects on glycine potency of the GRIN2A mutations were similar to those recorded for glutamate with P79R, C231Y, C483R and M705V producing significant decreases in glycine potency compared to WT receptors (F1,36 = 246.2, 539.7, 347.2 and 116.3 respectively, p < 0.0001), (Fig. 3e,f and Table 2). These shifts in glutamate and glycine potency are not due to saturation of the Fluo-4AM calcium dye, as use of the higher-affinity Fluo-2AM did not alter the CRC curves (data not shown). Single cell patch clamp recordings of HEK cells transfected with G483R-GRIN2A and GRIN1 gave very similar results to the calcium-flux imaging, (Fig. 3g,h).

Figure 3

GRIN2A mutations alter the response to glutamate and glycine. (a,b) Pseudocolour images and representative single-cell traces from calcium-flux imaging for HEK cells transfected with either WT or G483R GRIN2A showing different calcium responses caused by the application of increasing concentrations of glutamate (30 nM–30 µM red arrows). Individual cell traces in cyan and the mean response in red. (c,d) Normalised concentration response curves (CRCs) to increasing concentrations of glutamate from single cell calcium-flux imaging. In (c) 4 mutants; P79R, C231Y, C483R and M705V have reduced agonist potency, while C436R and D731N show no response to glutamate. Four mutant constructs (d), show an unaltered response to glutamate. (e,f) Normalised CRCs to increasing glycine concentration with constant 3 µM glutamate – the mutations show similar responses as to glutamate. See Table 2 for n to create averaged data per construct, 3 × 104 cells/well. Error bars ± SEM. (g) Representative continuous voltage-clamp recordings obtained from HEK cells transfected with WT or G483R GRIN2A plasmid. Bars above the recording indicate glutamate application (co-applied with 30 µM glycine). Application of increasing concentrations of glutamate shows a progressive increase in current observed, the sensitivity of which is shifted to higher concentrations of glutamate in the G483R mutant compared to WT. (h) Normalised CRC to glutamate as recorded in (g) indicates the same response as for single cell calcium imaging (n = 3).

Table 2 Summary of Glutamate and Glycine EC50 for wild type and mutant GluN2A constructs.

GRIN2A mutations can alter total levels of GluN2A protein

Ion channel mutations often cause reduced protein expression due to degradation of misfolded proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) quality control pathway. Using single-cell calcium-flux imaging we investigated if the percentage of HEK cells with NMDARs responding to glutamate changed with mutation type. This was achieved by first perfusing the cells with a maximal glutamate concentration to activate NMDAR expressing cells, and then a maximal MgATP concentration to induce intracellular calcium release via P2Y purinergic receptors found on all HEK cells24. Figure 4a show example data for cells transfected with the WT plasmid, where 81% (±2.7% SEM) responded to maximal glutamate. This also shows the transfection efficiency of the plasmids. There was no significant difference for E714K, I814T, D933N and N976S, mutants with no altered glutamate potency. The two mutants who did not respond to glutamate, C436R and D731N, again showed no response here (Dunnett’s corrected one-way ANOVA, F9,51 = 23.01, p < 0.001). Interestingly the responses differ for the mutants with decreased glutamate potency, but do not directly correlate with the severity of the agonist potency change; 75% (±5.7%) of P79R cells responded to glutamate (not significant), 61% (±6.3%) of G483R (not significant), 49% (±15%) of M705V (p < 0.01) and 18% (±6.4%) of C231Y (p < 0.001), (Fig. 4b–e), indicating protein degradation and/or trafficking are altered here as well in these mutants.

Figure 4

GRIN2A mutations alter the number of cells responding to glutamate. (a–d) Each panel contains pseudocolour images of HEK cells transfected with WT or mutant GRIN2A showing co-localisation of responses to application of 100 µM glutamate +30 µM glycine (green - activation of surface-expressing GluN2A receptors) and subsequently 100 µM MgATP (red - activation of endogenous P2Y receptors). Panels also show single-cell traces from the same experiment, indicating the different effects of these agonists on cells transfected with (a) WT, (b) M705V, (c) C231Y or (d) C436R mutants. Individual cell traces displayed in cyan and the mean response shown in red. (e) Ratio of the number of transfected HEK cells responding to 100 µM glutamate +30 µM glycine subsequent to 100 µM MgATP. Dunnett’s corrected one-way ANOVA compared to WT, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ns = non-significant. Data averaged from n = 12 wells, 3 × 104 cells/well, for each construct over 2 assays. Error bars ± SEM.

Western Blotting of total cell lysates from the transfected HEK cells show that GluN2A total protein levels were greatly reduced for most of the mutants, with the lowest relative expression for the two that alter cysteine residues, C231Y (31% ± 6.1) and C436R (18% ± 6.9), (Fig. 5a,b).

Figure 5

GRIN2A mutations reduce total protein levels and membrane trafficking of GluN2A. (a) Representative Western blot of HEK lysates probed with anti-GluN2A antibody (top), and anti-GAPDH (bottom) as a loading control. Bands around 180 kDa indicate GluN2A. WT, wild type, UT – untransfected. Right is Amersham Full-Range rainbow molecular weight marker with the blot imaged in visible light. (b) Plot of amount of GluN2A protein, normalised to WT, from Western blotting of total cell lysates of transiently co-transfected HEK cells 48-hours post transfection. Average of 3 blots from 3 independent transfections. Error bars indicated SEM. (c) Fixed and immunolabelled co-transfected HEK cells with anti-HA antibody (red) to detect surface GluN2A expression, and fixed, permeabilised and immunolabelled with the same antibody to detect total GluN2A protein levels. Scale bar 25 µm. Nuclei stained with Hoechst (blue). (d) Quantitation of surface and total GluN2A protein levels, averaged over the total number of cells analyzed for each condition (n is between 903 to 2255 cells), reveals greatly reduced surface expression of GluN2A as measured by fluorescence intensity. Dunnett’s corrected one-way ANOVA for membrane or total intensity as compared to WT *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ns = non-significant. Average ± SEM. (e) Relative surface levels of NMDARs correlated with the log of glutamate EC50 (Pearson’s coefficient of determination r2 = 0.77, two-tailed p = 0.002). (f) Normalised CRC from single-cell calcium-flux imaging. Response to increasing concentrations of glutamate from HEK cells co-transfected with decreasing quantities of WT GRIN2A per well (100% = 320 ng) with standard 320 ng GRIN1 per well. Response is compared to mutant P79R. Error bars ± SEM.

GRIN2A mutations can alter GluN2A membrane trafficking

Functional checkpoints in the ER can limit forward trafficking of NMDA receptors to the cell surface14. As many mutants reduce total GluN2A protein levels, we wanted to ascertain if they also reduced cell surface expression. Co-transfected HEK cells were fixed with, and without membrane permeabilisation, and incubated with anti-HA-tag antibody, which would ensure binding to the extracellular part of the NMDAR receptor. The average intensity of labelled surface receptor immunofluorescence and of total GluN2A immunofluorescence was calculated for each mutant (Fig. 5c,d)25. The immunocytochemistry data explains why cells transfected with mutant C436R do not respond to glutamate – the protein does not traffic to the cell membrane (Dunnett’s corrected one-way ANOVA F10,55 = 6.01, p < 0.001). However for D731N some protein does reach the surface of some cells, although is still significantly reduced (p < 0.001), but for this mutant it does not respond to glutamate or glycine. Three of the four mutants with reduced agonist potency, P79R, C231Y and G483R, all have significantly reduced membrane expression (p < 0.001), which is also only present in a very small number of cells. G483R also has significantly reduced total expression, p < 0.001). The reduction of surface expression for M705V is not significant. Interestingly, E714K has a similar level of surface expression to M705V; however, the E714K receptors that reach the cell surface appear to have a normal agonist response, whereas for M705V they do not. Mutants E714K, I814T, D933N and N976S also did not show a significant change in surface or total protein labelling.

The relative level of cell surface expression of the mutant GluN2A constructs correlates well with the glutamate EC50 (Fig. 5e). Our results suggest that ligand binding affinity is not determined by cell surface expression. Figure 5f shows that transfection of HEK with 25% less WT GRIN2A plasmid compared to the normal 320 ng/well does not alter the response to glutamate. There is a small shift when 12.5% of the plasmid is used, but this does not then shift further at 6.25%, and is much smaller than the significant shift seen for P79R, where the average intensity of surface expression is 30% of WT levels.

Pharmacological rescue of function can be achieved for selected GRIN2A mutants

A standard approach for rescuing loss of function phenotypes, as observed here, is the use of pharmacological modulators to enhance receptor function. We hypothesized that mutations which reduce agonist potency could have their function rescued by a selective positive allosteric modulator (PAM). We chose a GluN2A-selective compound recently disclosed in a patent application (compound 275 in ref. 23, GluN2A EC50 12 nM). Initial assays indicated that pre-incubation for 1 minute followed by co-application of 1 µM of the PAM alongside a lower concentration of glutamate significantly increased the calcium influx for the wild type and mutant receptors (Bonferroni corrected one-way ANOVA, F7,10 = 55.25, p < 0.001 for WT, P79R and C231Y, G483R is not significant) (Fig. 6a–c and Supplementary Fig. S2). The agonist potency of these mutants was then partially or fully restored to WT levels in the presence of 1 µM PAM followed by sequential addition of increasing concentrations of glutamate (Fig. 6d–h). The EC50 for P79R decreased from 1.45 to 0.13 µM (F1,97 = 497.5, p < 0.0001) (WT EC50 is 0.42 µM), C231Y from 1.89 to 0.26 µM (F1,77 = 209.2, p < 0.0001), G483R from 11.30 to 1.37 µM (F1,87 = 484.3, p < 0.0001) and M705V from 0.89 to 0.03 µM (F1,91 = 500.6, p < 0.0001). The PAM did not have an effect on mutant D731N or C436R (data not shown).

Figure 6

Pharmacological rescue of functional deficits can be achieved for selected GRIN2A mutants. Examples of single-cell imaging of HEK transfected with (a) WT and (b) C231Y mutant showing calcium-influx response to 300 nM glutamate before and after incubation with 1 µM PAM and in comparison to maximal 30 µM glutamate. (c) Graph of single cell imaging data showing response of WT and mutants P79R, C231Y and G483R to 300 nM glutamate with and without 1 µM PAM. Bonferroni corrected ANOVA ***p < 0.001, n = 15 wells (over 3 assays) for each construct, 3 × 104 cells/well. Mean ± SEM. (d) Examples of single cell imaging of HEK transfected with C231Y mutant showing calcium-influx response to increasing concentrations of glutamate (30 nM, 100 nM, 300 nM, 1 µM, 10 µM and 30 µM arrows) top, and below, increasing concentrations of glutamate (30 nM, 100 nM, 300 nM, 1 µM and 30 µM arrows) with constant 1 µM PAM. Individual cell traces displayed in cyan and the mean response shown in red. (e–h) Concentration response curves of mutant (P79R, C231Y, G483R or M705V) GRIN2A transfected in HEK cells to increasing concentrations of glutamate (30 nM to 30 µM) during incubation with 1 µM PAM recorded from single-cell calcium-flux imaging. Each graph shows the response of the WT GRIN2A construct with no PAM in red (curve from Fig. 3c) and the response of the mutant before (solid line) and after (dashed line) the addition of PAM. p < 0.0001 for LogEC50 for each construct + PAM when compared to without PAM addition. Data averaged from n = 12 wells for each construct, 3 × 104 cells/well, (over 3 assays). Error bars ± SEM.


In this study we have carried out a functional analysis of 10 disease-associated missense mutations of GRIN2A that were chosen by a bioinformatics and patient-centric approach, and have uncovered a range of molecular consequences. GRIN2A mutations in EAS are spread across the gene and our work, combined with others where EAS- or early-onset epileptic encephalopathy associated GRIN2A mutations (studied generally in the homozygous state) have been shown to affect zinc sensitivity16, 26, increase glutamate potency27, 28, alter channel gating kinetics17, 28 or eliminate the Mg2+ block11, indicate a complex pathophysiological picture. Whilst there appears to be a clear rational for alteration of function in some cases, such as substitution of a cysteine residue leading to drastic changes in protein folding and degradation (e.g. C436R here), or substitution of a zinc binding residue slowing zinc dissociation kinetics e.g. R370W in26, in other cases further understanding of the structure-function relationships of the NMDAR are needed, such as why L812M in the linker region between the ABD and TM domains enhances agonist potency28, whereas I814T studied here, has no effect on agonist potency.

Three mutants have a “double hit” of significantly reduced agonist potency and surface expression; P79R, C231Y and G483R. They were found in children with the most severe EAS subtypes, ECSWS and LKS. M705V also disrupts in a similar manner but to a lesser extent, and is found in a child with less severe Rolandic epilepsy.

Residue G483 occurs on a flexible loop and seems important in the structure of the glutamate binding site, which would be restricted by the change to the large, positive arginine residue. Previously, site directed mutagenesis of the neighboring residue K484 to aspartic acid reduced glutamate affinity 6-fold but had no measurable effect on glycine binding29. Interestingly K484 is not conserved in GluN1, whereas G483 is. Residue P79, within the NTD, is conserved across all GluN paralogues and is predicted to make extensive contact with GluN130. Replacement of the proline with the basic arginine residue likely disrupts this contact and the overall NMDAR structure, indirectly affecting the binding of glutamate and glycine. Interestingly Serraz et al. also reported that this mutation decreases zinc sensitivity and enhances proton sensitivity, which they hypothesized was also due to the distorted dimer formation between GluN1 and GluN2A26. Whilst Serraz et al. did not detect protein expression from mutation C231Y over-expressed in oocytes, we detected low levels in transiently transfected HEK-293. We identified a reduction in potency of glutamate and glycine due to the change from cysteine to bulky tyrosine in a hydrophobic cavity of the NTD. This likely causes protein misfolding, leading to an altered binding pocket for agonists and protein degradation. Mutation M705V is located in the ABD, and whilst the substitution is for another hydrophobic residue, this residue is conserved between all GluN subtypes and forms part of the S2 domain of the glutamate binding site (although further away than the other mutations, Fig. 1c).

These four mutations also cause significant reductions in glycine potency. Although glycine binds GluN1, interactions between the ligand binding domains of GluN1 and GluN2A can alter agonist binding potency, as reported for mutations in the ABD of GluN2A31. Interestingly, mutation E714K did not appear to alter agonist potency despite its location within the ABD – most likely because the residue is located on the protein’s surface and is not highly conserved. However, this mutation did cause a small, but non-significant reduction in surface expression indicating potential changes in protein folding.

Two mutants create a total lack of NMDAR function as di-heteromeric receptors, C436R and D731N. Mutant C436R is not present at detectable levels on the cell surface and overall GluN2A protein levels are drastically reduced (as also seen in transfected oocytes26). It is likely that the replacement of the cysteine residue with polar arginine and breakage of a disulphide bridge causes misfolding and protein degradation for this mutant. This most severe mutation effect is seen in a child with ABPE and occurred de novo. On the other hand, mutant D731N does show a low level of surface GluN2A, but shows no response to glutamate or glycine. Interestingly, in studies of the glycine binding site on GluN1, this same residue (D732) when mutated to alanine, caused 90% of the protein to be trapped in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) upon co-expression with GluN2A and the remainder on the cell surface bound glycine with a 4000-fold reduction in potency32, 33. Mutation of D731 to alanine or glutamic acid in GluN2A also produced no response in voltage-clamped oocytes33. This residue in GluN2A forms a direct contact with glutamate via a salt bridge, which may indicate why such a severe phenotype was observed.

Surface trafficking of ionotropic glutamate receptors seems to require ligand binding to pass a quality control checkpoint and exit the ER. Indeed the efficiency of glutamate binding to GluN2B mutant subunits correlates with levels of cell-surface receptor and trafficking to synapses. Co-expression with wild-type GluN2B does not enhance surface expression, indicating that occupancy of both glutamate binding sites is required for proper surface delivery34. The integrity of the glycine binding site of GluN1 is also required for efficient ER exit and cell surface trafficking, most likely after GluN1-GluN2 subunit assembly32. Thus, glycine binding to GluN1, and we hypothesize given the above work, glutamate binding to GluN2A within the ER, controls forward trafficking of the NMDAR to the cell surface. Therefore the patient-derived mutant NMDARs described here, which do not bind these agonists effectively, appear to have reduced or absent trafficking, (Fig. 5e).

Haploinsufficieny of GluN2A subunits through reduction in cell surface levels or lack of response to agonists, as described here, may cause hyper-excitable brain networks through several mechanisms. There may be a relative excess of GluN2B subunit NMDARs in these patients, and with the slower deactivation time-course of GluN2B-containing receptors this could lead to over excitability of the neuronal network35. Activity of GluN2A-containing NMDARs is also pivotal in the development and maintenance of the GABAergic function of parvalbumin (PV)-positive interneurons36. Thus a reduction in function of GluN2A in these interneurons could lead to a poorly functioning inhibitory network. Expression of GluN2A subunits increases postnatally, replacing GluN2B at the synapse. This results in a balance of synaptic plasticity and stability that is vital for the maturation of associative learning, and dampens hyper-excitation from increased sensory input37. A reduction in GluN2A expression during this critical period may create an underdeveloped inhibitory network, again with potential for epileptogenicity.

The current study has some limitations. Missense mutations identified in EAS patients so far are heterozygous, and as the tetrameric NMDAR is formed of two GluN2 subunits and two GluN1, some receptors in the patients will most likely contain one copy of the mutation. We have reported the effects of receptors containing two mutant GluN2A copies, as others have done so, but hypothesize that those with one mutant copy will have an intermediate phenotype for agonist affinity38, but remain the same for surface expression34. Another limitation is that we have so far only studied the effect of the mutations in a heterologous cell line. HEK-293 are a common and well-validated model for the study of membrane ion channels as they do not contain other channels that need to be blocked, simplifying assay conditions. However, analysis in a more native environment could potentially offer further insights into the effects of the mutations, although they would still need to be overexpressed. We would expect the mutations studied here to have similar effects on NMDAR trafficking and agonist potency in cultured primary neurons, as others have shown translational results26, 34. Additional studies will aid clarification of this hypothesis.

We did not find any effects of the mutations I814T, D933N and N976S on the function of NMDARs, however this is not to say that they do not exert an effect on the protein. The C-terminal of GluN2A couples to diverse intracellular cascades such as for scaffolding and post-synaptic signaling, and post-translational modifications are important here14, 39. Further work may determine their associations with these residues. Given the low CADD score of N976S, and the fact that it is the only missense variant reported in two unrelated cases to date, it may be that it is a very rare benign variant; however, it has not been reported so far in any control population.

We rescued the function of receptors with reduced glutamate potency by incubation with a novel GluN2A-specific PAM. Due to the differing magnitudes of effect of the mutants on agonist potency, it can be seen that different concentrations of the PAM would be needed for perfect restoration of function. The function of D731N could not be restored by this method, presumably because glutamate does not bind to this mutant. The search for new potentiators for clinical enhancement of NMDAR function has been sporadic. However, with NMDAR hypofunction now shown here to be a disease mechanism in epilepsy, as well as schizophrenia40, cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease41, this may be changing42. Rescue of mutant receptors that are trapped within the ER may also be possible using cell-and-ER permeable competitive antagonists, as has been achieved for D732A-GluN1 using the competitive glycine site antagonist DCKA32, however cell permeability may be an issue for GluN2A-specific antagonists.

The mutations studied here show a range of phenotypic deficits, and combined with the work of others indicate a complex picture of molecular consequences. Modern translational medicine techniques will be needed to identify patient mutations through high-throughput sequencing, and confirm the type of molecular dysfunction before the identification of potential therapeutic compounds in vitro. This strategy of personalized medicine may allow for a repositioning of certain approved-compounds and a reduction in the number of antiepileptic medications used, and could dramatically alter disease progression and the development of the affected child.


Selection of mutants and functional hypotheses

31 missense mutations from individuals with EAS disorders15,16,17 were assigned Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) scores20 using the web tool v1.3 to create predictions of deleteriousness. These CADD scores were compared to those for controls from the Exome Variant Server (EVS) ( assessed 05/2016) where 65/6474 individuals sequenced across GRIN2A had a missense variant. A scaled CADD score cut off of 20 was used to indicate a variant as highly likely to be deleterious.

A contribution to the selection of the mutants included here was a hypothesis of the function of each mutant based on their location in available structures of GluN2A (or homologous GluN2B structures). P79R is present in the NTD, this mutation was hypothesised to affect the conformation of that region of the protein, in addition to affecting the contacts that the proline residue has with GluN1. C231Y is also present in the NTD, this mutation causes a significant change in residue size and was hypothesised to affect the conformation of this region of the protein. C436R is present in the ABD and is involved in a disulfide bond; this mutation was hypothesised to be highly destabilizing. G483R is present in the ABD in close proximity to the glutamate binding site and thus predicted to affect binding affinity. M705V is present in the ABD, albeit slightly further away from the glutamate binding site; some protein conformational change was hypothesised. E714K is present in the ABD, but on the protein surface. In some crystal structures it is not full resolved suggesting it is flexible and non-essential for protein stability, thus a limited effect on glutamate binding was hypothesised. D731N is present in the ABD and forms a direct contact to glutamate via a salt bridge; this mutation was hypothesised to have a significant effect on glutamate binding although the protein was expected to still be able to fold correctly. I814T is present on the linker between the ABD and TMD, the effect of this mutation was unclear from a structural perspective. Mutations D933N and N976S are both present in the CTD and are not structurally characterized so hypotheses could not be generated.

DNA constructs

Human GRIN2A (GenBank accession: NM_000833.3) cDNA clone was purchased from OriGene Technologies (Cat#: SC122120). The various mutants of GRIN2A and insertion of the HA-tag into GRIN2A were generated by PCR-based mutagenesis using the wild-type cDNA clone as template. Mutations inserted were: P79R, C231Y, C436R, G483R, M705V, E714K, D731N, I814T, D933N and N976S. The nucleotide sequences encoding full-length wild-type and various mutants were inserted into pcDNA3.1 (+) (Invitrogen) with the cytomegalovirus (CMV) enhancer-promoter for high expression, and verified by DNA sequencing. Human GRIN1 (GenBank accession NM_000832.5) cDNA clone was also purchased from Origene Technologies (Cat#: SC308819) and inserted into a second pcDNA3.1 (+) vector. An empty pcDNA3.1 (+) vector was used as a control in the live cell imaging assays and co-transfected with the GRIN1 plasmid. Transfection efficiency was assessed in the calcium flux assay as the number of HEK cells responding to maximal glutamate (Fig. 4e) vs. those responding to MgATP, as NMDAR can only function if both GRIN1 and GRIN2A plasmids transfect and express the protein.

Cell culture and transient transfection

HEK-293 cells were cultured in high glucose DMEM medium (Gibco) containing 2 mM penicillin/streptomycin and glutamine (Gibco) and 5% bovine calf serum (Gibco). Cells were plated at a density of 3 × 104 cells/well in 96-well black-walled poly(D)-lysine coated plates (Corning) with the addition of 1mM Ketamine (Sigma) in the culture media. Cells were transfected using 0.4 µl Lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoFisher) per well, with 320 ng GRIN1 construct and 320 ng of a GRIN2A construct. Transfection with GRIN1 is presumed in the figure legends. For the transfection assay (Fig. 5f), varying amounts of WT GRIN2A plasmid (320, 160, 80, 40 and 20 ng) were added per well, along with 320 ng GRIN1. Cells were kept in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and used for all assays 48-hours after plating and transfection.

Continuous live cell imaging – cell toxicity assay

HEK-293 cells were seeded and transiently transfected as detailed above, but without Ketamine in the culture media. Cytotox-Red dye (Essen BioScience) was added to each well to 1:400 dilution for labelling of nucleic acids in dead cells upon excitation at 585 nm. Plates were imaged one field per well every 6 hours in the Incucyte ZOOM live cell imaging system (Essen BioScience) for 48 hours. Images were analysed with the Incucyte ZOOM software and data normalised to the initial confluencey of cells in each well to control for inter-well plating variability.

Calcium flux assays

HEK-293 cells were seeded and transiently transfected as detailed above. After 48 hours, media was removed and 100 µl of buffer containing the cell-permeant calcium binding dye at 4 µM, Fluo-4 AM (ThermoFisher), 0.1% pluronic acid (ThermoFisher) and 1mM Ketamine was added per well. Details of the buffers and method used for the single cell calcium flux imaging are as in22. A modified HEPES-buffered Tyrode’s solution (HBTS) (Invitrogen) was used throughout the experiments and called “perfusion buffer”, containing (mM): 135 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, pH 7.2). Transfected cells were identified as responding to compound addition due to fluorescence of the Fluo-4 AM dye upon calcium influx into the cells. Data were analysed by averaging individual traces collected from cells in multiple wells of the 96-well plate. N = well number, and number of experiments is listed below each figure. Nonlinear regression using the least squares fit of the log(agonist) vs. response – variable slope (four parameters) was applied to the fluorescence intensity values with background removed, and were normalised to the maximal response for each mutant.

For all assays described below, compounds are diluted in perfusion buffer and glycine (Tocris) is at 30 µM unless otherwise stated. For the glutamate CRC assays, increasing concentrations of glutamate (ranging from 30 nM to 30 µM) (Sigma) were perfused over the cells every 30 seconds, whilst keeping constant 30 µM glycine. For the glycine CRC assays, increasing concentrations of glycine from 30 nM to 30 µM were perfused over the cells, with constant 3 µM glutamate. For the cell counting assay, initially 100 µM glutamate with 30 µM glycine were perfused over the cells for 30 seconds, followed by a wash for 3 minutes and then perfusion with 100 µM MgATP (Sigma) for 30 seconds. The GluN2A-selective PAM was synthesized in-house following the structure of the compound named “example 275” from the referenced patent application23. The structure of the compound is listed in the patent, and the potency for GluN2A is listed with an EC50 of 12 nM. This compound is subsequently referred to as the PAM. For the assays using the PAM, two different protocols were used, as described in Fig. 6.

Patch Clamp Recordings

Whole–cell voltage clamp recordings were carried out on transfected HEK-293 cells at a holding potential of −60 mV (at 21 °C) using an Axopatch 200A amplifier (Molecular Devices). Current data were recorded at 10 kHz using a DA/AD interface (Digidata 1322A, Molecular Devices). Patch pipettes were pulled using a horizontal puller (Sutter Instruments) from thin-walled borosilicate glass (Harvard apparatus, Ltd.) that gave resistances between 4 and 7 MΩ when filled with the intracellular electrode solution. The pipette solution comprised of (in mM) 140 K-Gluconate, 1 MgCl2, 4 MgATP, 0.5 EGTA, 10 HEPES, (adjusted to pH 7.3 with KOH, all Sigma). Cells were perfused with the same perfusion buffer used in the calcium flux assay containing 30 µM glycine, and glutamate from 30 nM to 30 µM as detailed in Fig. 3, using a multichannel perfusion system (Model BPS-8, Scientifica). Transfected cells were identified by an initial large response to maximal glutamate and glycine and used for subsequent recording protocols.

Western Blotting

HEK-293 cells were harvested 48-hours after transient transfection. Proteins were extracted using RIPA buffer (Sigma) with Halt phosphatase inhibitor (ThermoFisher) and protease inhibitor cocktail (Calbiochem) for 10 minutes on ice. Proteins (4 µg/well) were prepared in 1xLaemmli buffer (Bio-Rad) and 5% β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), heated at 37 °C for 15 min and resolved on a 3–8% Tris-acetate NuPAGE Novex gel (ThermoFisher). Proteins were then transferred onto Hybond-ECL nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham) which was cut on the 38 kDa marker and the top part (>38 kDa) incubated with anti-GluN2A antibody (M264, Sigma) at 1:1000 and the bottom part with anti-GAPDH antibody (AM4300, Ambion) 1:10,000. Primary antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-rabbit (GluN2A) and anti-mouse (GAPDH) antibodies (Sigma) at 1:10,000 dilution, followed by signal development with SuperSignal West Dura reagent (ThermoFisher). Protein bands were detected on an Image Quant Las 400 Mini apparatus (GE Healthcare). Images were also obtained in the visible light spectrum for alignment of the molecular weight marker bands. Values reported are means of four different transfection, lysis and Western blotting experiments, i.e. N = 4.


48-hours after transfection HEK cells were treated in two different ways: 1) For total GluN2A labelling, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min before blocking/permeabilisation with 5% BSA (Thermo Fisher) 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. 2) For membrane-only staining, cells were blocked in PBS with 5% BSA and 1mM Ketamine for 1 hour at room temperature. For both methods, HA-tagged GluN2A was immunolabelled using anti-HA antibody (H6908) at 5 µg/ml in PBS with 0.5% BSA, (and 0.1% Triton X-100 for the total GluN2A labelled cells), for 2 hours at 4 °C, followed by washing. The membrane-only cells were now fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Both cell types were then incubated for 1.5 hours with Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated donkey-anti-rabbit secondary antibody at 1:1000 in the dark (A-31572, Thermo Fisher). Cells were finally then incubated for 10 min at room temperature with Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain (Thermo Fisher). Stained cells were viewed by confocal microscopy using the Olympus FV1000. Image files were analysed by using Cell Profiler24. Briefly images were segmented by using the nuclear staining channel followed by measurement of average fluorescence intensity in the Alexa-555 channel.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analysed using Prism 5 (Graph Pad). Where appropriate, data were tested for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and passed. Alpha was 0.05. Analysis of statistical significance was assessed using either a one way ANOVA corrected for multiple testing with Dunnett’s correction for Figs 2c, 4e and 5d, and with Bonferroni correction for 6c, and the extra-sum-of-squares F-test of best-fit values of LogEC50 used for Figs 3c–f, 5f and 6e–h. Correlation between surface levels of Glu2NA expression and EC50 for the mutations was assessed using Pearson’s coefficient of determination in Fig. 5e.


  1. 1.

    Tsai, M. H. et al. Clinical genetic study of the epilepsy-aphasia spectrum. Epilepsia. 54, 280–287 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rudolf, G., Valenti, M. P., Hirsch, E. & Szepetowski, P. From rolandic epilepsy to continuous spike-and-waves during sleep and Landau-Kleffner syndromes: insights into possible genetic factors. Epilepsia. 50 (Suppl 7), 25–28 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Smith, A. B., Bajomo, O. & Pal, D. K. A meta-analysis of literacy and language in children with rolandic epilepsy. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 57, 1019–1026 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Guerrini, R. & Pellacani, S. Benign childhood focal epilepsies. Epilepsia. 53 (Suppl 4), 9–18 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hahn, A., Pistohl, J., Neubauer, B. A. & Stephani, U. Atypical “benign” partial epilepsy or pseudo-Lennox syndrome. Part I: symptomatology and long-term prognosis. Neuropediatrics. 32, 1–8 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Caraballo, R. H. et al. Landau-Kleffner syndrome: a study of 29 patients. Seizure. 23, 98–104 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hughes, J. R. A review of the relationships between Landau-Kleffner syndrome, electrical status epilepticus during sleep, and continuous spike-waves during sleep. Epilepsy Behav. 20, 247–253 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kelemen, A. et al. Thalamic lesion and epilepsy with generalized seizures, ESES and spike-wave paroxysms–report of three cases. Seizure. 15, 454–458 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Panjwani, N. et al. A microRNA-328 binding site in PAX6 is associated with centrotemporal spikes of rolandic epilepsy. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 3, 512–522 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Strug, L. J. et al. Centrotemporal sharp wave EEG trait in rolandic epilepsy maps to Elongator Protein Complex 4 (ELP4). Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 17, 1171–1181 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Endele, S. et al. Mutations in GRIN2A and GRIN2B encoding regulatory subunits of NMDA receptors cause variable neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Nat. Genet. 42, 1021–1026 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Reutlinger, C. et al. Deletions in 16p13 including GRIN2A in patients with intellectual disability, various dysmorphic features, and seizure disorders of the rolandic region. Epilepsia. 51, 1870–1873 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lesca, G. et al. Epileptic encephalopathies of the Landau-Kleffner and continuous spike and waves during slow-wave sleep types: genomic dissection makes the link with autism. Epilepsia. 53, 1526–1538 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Traynelis, S. F. et al. Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol. Rev. 62, 405–496 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Carvill, G. L. et al. GRIN2A mutations cause epilepsy-aphasia spectrum disorders. Nat. Genet. 45, 1073–1076 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lemke, J. R. et al. Mutations in GRIN2A cause idiopathic focal epilepsy with rolandic spikes. Nat. Genet. 45, 1067–1072 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lesca, G. et al. GRIN2A mutations in acquired epileptic aphasia and related childhood focal epilepsies and encephalopathies with speech and language dysfunction. Nat. Genet. 45, 1061–1066 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Burnashev, N. & Szepetowski, P. NMDA receptor subunit mutations in neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 20, 73–82 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Paoletti, P., Bellone, C. & Zhou, Q. NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 383–400 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kircher, M. et al. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat. Genet. 46, 310–315 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cik, M., Chazot, P. L. & Stephenson, F. A. Optimal expression of cloned NMDAR1/NMDAR2A heteromeric glutamate receptors: a biochemical characterization. Biochem. J. 296 (Pt 3), 877–883 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chatzidaki, A. et al. Pharmacological Characterisation of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Expressed in Human iPSC-Derived Neurons. PLoS. One. 10, e0125116 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yu, J. et al. Thiazolopyrimidinones as modulators of nmda receptor activity. PCT/EP2014/071522 (16 April 2015).

  24. 24.

    Sumi, Y. et al. Adrenergic receptor activation involves ATP release and feedback through purinergic receptors. Am. J. Physiol Cell Physiol. 299, C1118–C1126 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Carpenter, A. E. et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 7, R100 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Serraz, B., Grand, T. & Paoletti, P. Altered zinc sensitivity of NMDA receptors harboring clinically-relevant mutations. Neuropharmacology. 109, 196–204 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Pierson, T. M. et al. GRIN2A mutation and early-onset epileptic encephalopathy: personalized therapy with memantine. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 1, 190–198 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yuan, H. et al. Functional analysis of a de novo GRIN2A missense mutation associated with early-onset epileptic encephalopathy. Nat. Commun. 5, 3251 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lummis, S. C., Fletcher, E. J. & Green, T. Identification of a new site in the S1 ligand binding region of the NMDA receptor NR2A subunit involved in receptor activation by glutamate. Neuropharmacology. 42, 437–443 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Karakas, E., Simorowski, N. & Furukawa, H. Subunit arrangement and phenylethanolamine binding in GluN1/GluN2B NMDA receptors. Nature. 475, 249–253 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chen, P. E. et al. Modulation of glycine potency in rat recombinant NMDA receptors containing chimeric NR2A/2D subunits expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J. Physiol. 586, 227–245 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kenny, A. V., Cousins, S. L., Pinho, L. & Stephenson, F. A. The integrity of the glycine co-agonist binding site of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors is a functional quality control checkpoint for cell surface delivery. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 324–333 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Williams, K., Chao, J., Kashiwagi, K., Masuko, T. & Igarashi, K. Activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors by glycine: role of an aspartate residue in the M3-M4 loop of the NR1 subunit. Mol. Pharmacol. 50, 701–708 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    She, K., Ferreira, J. S., Carvalho, A. L. & Craig, A. M. Glutamate binding to the GluN2B subunit controls surface trafficking of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 27432–27445 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yuan, H., Hansen, K. B., Vance, K. M., Ogden, K. K. & Traynelis, S. F. Control of NMDA receptor function by the NR2 subunit amino-terminal domain. J. Neurosci. 29, 12045–12058 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kinney, J. W. et al. A specific role for NR2A-containing NMDA receptors in the maintenance of parvalbumin and GAD67 immunoreactivity in cultured interneurons. J. Neurosci. 26, 1604–1615 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Dumas, T. C. Developmental regulation of cognitive abilities: modified composition of a molecular switch turns on associative learning. Prog. Neurobiol. 76, 189–211 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Yuan, H., Low, C. M., Moody, O. A., Jenkins, A. & Traynelis, S. F. Ionotropic GABA and Glutamate Receptor Mutations and Human Neurologic Diseases. Mol. Pharmacol. 88, 203–217 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lussier, M. P., Sanz-Clemente, A. & Roche, K. W. Dynamic Regulation of N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) and alpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid (AMPA) Receptors by Posttranslational Modifications. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 28596–28603 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Coyle, J. T., Tsai, G. & Goff, D. Converging evidence of NMDA receptor hypofunction in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1003, 318–327 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Foster, T. C., Kyritsopoulos, C. and Kumar, A. Central role for NMDA receptors in redox mediated impairment of synaptic function during aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Behav. Brain Res. (2016).

  42. 42.

    Jambrina, E. et al. An Integrated Approach for Screening and Identification of Positive Allosteric Modulators of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors. J. Biomol. Screen. 21, 468–479 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We wish to thank Olivera Grubisha, Many Sher, Keith Wafford, Ruud Zwart, Jeremy Findlay, Antoine Fouillet and Antigoni Katsikoudi (Eli Lilly) for technical support and helpful discussions, to Discovery Chemistry Synthesis Group at Eli Lilly for the synthesis of compounds used in this study, and to the group of Yue-Wei Qian at Eli Lilly for the generation of the plasmid constructs. The authors would like to thank the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project and its ongoing studies which produced and provided exome variant calls for comparison: the Lung GO Sequencing Project (HL-102923), the WHI Sequencing Project (HL-102924), the Broad GO Sequencing Project (HL-102925), the Seattle GO Sequencing Project (HL-102926) and the Heart GO Sequencing Project (HL-103010). This work was funded by a Lilly Innovation Award to LA. European Union Grant agreement 602531: “Strategies for Innovative Research to Improve Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment in Children with Difficult to Treat Epilepsy (DESIRE)” of the Seventh Framework Programme (DKP); Canadian Institutes of Health Research (201503MOP-342469 (DKP); and Waterloo Foundation (DKP).

Author information




L.A. and D.U. designed the study. L.A. carried out the Incucyte cell mortality assays, single cell imaging assays, Western Blotting and IF imaging. J.K.V. carried out the patch-clamp assays. D.A.C. and L.A. carried out the bioinformatics analysis. L.R.V. carried out the protein modelling analysis and created the model images. D.K.P. contributed clinical information. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Addis.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Addis, L., Virdee, J.K., Vidler, L.R. et al. Epilepsy-associated GRIN2A mutations reduce NMDA receptor trafficking and agonist potency – molecular profiling and functional rescue. Sci Rep 7, 66 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing