Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Hydrogel-based molecular tension fluorescence microscopy for investigating receptor-mediated rigidity sensing

Abstract

Extracellular matrix (ECM) rigidity serves as a crucial mechanical cue impacting diverse biological processes. However, understanding the molecular mechanisms of rigidity sensing has been limited by the spatial resolution and force sensitivity of current cellular force measurement techniques. Here we developed a method to functionalize DNA tension probes on soft hydrogel surfaces in a controllable and reliable manner, enabling molecular tension fluorescence microscopy for rigidity sensing studies. Our findings showed that fibroblasts respond to substrate rigidity by recruiting more force-bearing integrins and modulating integrin sampling frequency of the ECM, rather than simply overloading the existing integrin–ligand bonds, to promote focal adhesion maturation. We also demonstrated that ECM rigidity positively regulates the pN force of T cell receptor–ligand bond and T cell receptor mechanical sampling frequency, promoting T cell activation. Thus, hydrogel-based molecular tension fluorescence microscopy implemented on a standard confocal microscope provides a simple and effective means to explore detailed molecular force information for rigidity-dependent biological processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Molecular tension probes coupled with TFM to jointly report cell adhesion force on hydrogel substrate.
Fig. 2: Probing the integrin-mediated molecular forces and net tractions of FAs during rigidity sensing.
Fig. 3: Probing the integrin–ECM binding dynamics on different hydrogels.
Fig. 4: Stiffness-dependent activation of naïve T cells modulated by mechanical response of TCRs.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All imaging data have been uploaded on Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24008127). Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qiu, Y. Z. et al. Platelet mechanosensing of substrate stiffness during clot formation mediates adhesion, spreading, and activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14430–14435 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Levental, K. R. et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 139, 891–906 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Polacheck, W. J. & Chen, C. S. Measuring cell-generated forces: a guide to the available tools. Nat. Methods 13, 415–423 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Prager-Khoutorsky, M. et al. Fibroblast polarization is a matrix-rigidity-dependent process controlled by focal adhesion mechanosensing. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1457–1465 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Plotnikov, S. V., Pasapera, A. M., Sabass, B. & Waterman, C. M. Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 151, 1513–1527 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elosegui-Artola, A. et al. Mechanical regulation of a molecular clutch defines force transmission and transduction in response to matrix rigidity. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 540–548 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elosegui-Artola, A., Trepat, X. & Roca-Cusachs, P. Control of mechanotransduction by molecular clutch dynamics. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 356–367 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elosegui-Artola, A. et al. Rigidity sensing and adaptation through regulation of integrin types. Nat. Mater. 13, 631–637 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stabley, D. R., Jurchenko, C., Marshall, S. S. & Salaita, K. S. Visualizing mechanical tension across membrane receptors with a fluorescent sensor. Nat. Methods 9, 64–67 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blakely, B. L. et al. A DNA-based molecular probe for optically reporting cellular traction forces. Nat. Methods 11, 1229–1232 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, Y., Ge, C., Zhu, C. & Salaita, K. DNA-based digital tension probes reveal integrin forces during early cell adhesion. Nat. Commun. 5, 5167 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, Y. et al. DNA-based nanoparticle tension sensors reveal that T-cell receptors transmit defined pN forces to their antigens for enhanced fidelity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5610–5615 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma, V. P. Y. et al. The magnitude of LFA-1/ICAM-1 forces fine-tune TCR-triggered T cell activation. Sci. Adv. 8, eabg4485 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, H. Y. et al. A reversible shearing DNA probe for visualizing mechanically strong receptors in living cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 642–651 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blanchard, A. T. & Salaita, K. Emerging uses of DNA mechanical devices. Science 365, 1080–1081 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma, V. P. Y. et al. Ratiometric tension probes for mapping receptor forces and clustering at intermembrane junctions. Nano Lett. 16, 4552–4559 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, Y., Yehl, K., Narui, Y. & Salaita, K. Tension sensing nanoparticles for mechano-imaging at the living/nonliving interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5320–5323 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, B. W. & Liu, J. W. Freezing-driven DNA adsorption on gold nanoparticles: tolerating extremely low salt concentration but requiring high DNA concentration. Langmuir 35, 6476–6482 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, T. B. et al. Determination of base binding strength and base stacking interaction of DNA duplex using atomic force microscope. Sci. Rep. 5, 9143 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. van den Dries, K. et al. Modular actin nano-architecture enables podosome protrusion and mechanosensing. Nat. Commun. 10, 5171 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Glazier, R. et al. DNA mechanotechnology reveals that integrin receptors apply pN forces in podosomes on fluid substrates. Nat. Commun. 10, 4507 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pal, K., Tu, Y. & Wang, X. Single-molecule force imaging reveals that podosome formation requires no extracellular integrin–ligand tensions or interactions. ACS Nano 16, 2481–2493 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, X. & Ha, T. Defining single molecular forces required to activate integrin and notch signaling. Science 340, 991–994 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, J. et al. Tension gauge tethers as tension threshold and duration sensors. ACS Sens. 8, 704–711 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rao, T. C. et al. EGFR activation attenuates the mechanical threshold for integrin tension and focal adhesion formation. J. Cell Sci. 133, jcs238840 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Austin, J., Tu, Y., Pal, K. & Wang, X. F. Vinculin transmits high-level integrin tensions that are dispensable for focal adhesion formation. Biophys. J. 122, 156–167 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma, R. et al. DNA probes that store mechanical information reveal transient piconewton forces applied by T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16949–16954 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Isomursu, A. et al. Directed cell migration towards softer environments. Nat. Mater. 21, 1081–1090 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu, B. Y., Chen, W., Evavold, B. D. & Zhu, C. Accumulation of dynamic catch bonds between TCR and agonist peptide-MHC triggers T cell signaling. Cell 157, 357–368 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, Y. C. et al. Cutting edge: mechanical forces acting on T cells immobilized via the TCR complex can trigger TCR signaling. J. Immunol. 184, 5959–5963 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Saitakis, M. et al. Different TCR-induced T lymphocyte responses are potentiated by stiffness with variable sensitivity. eLife 6, e23190 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Blumenthal, D., Chandra, V., Avery, L. & Burkhardt, J. K. Mouse T cell priming is enhanced by maturation-dependent stiffening of the dendritic cell cortex. eLife 9, e55995 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Roca-Cusachs, P., Conte, V. & Trepat, X. Quantifying forces in cell biology. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 742–751 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang, B. et al. Stopping transformed cancer cell growth by rigidity sensing. Nat. Mater. 19, 239–250 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tello-Lafoz, M. et al. Cytotoxic lymphocytes target characteristic biophysical vulnerabilities in cancer. Immunity 54, 1037–1054.e7 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lei, K. et al. Cancer-cell stiffening via cholesterol depletion enhances adoptive T-cell immunotherapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1411–1425 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, Y. et al. Cell softness prevents cytolytic T-cell killing of tumor-repopulating cells. Cancer Res. 81, 476–488 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kechagia, J. Z., Ivaska, J. & Roca-Cusachs, P. Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 457–473 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lo, C. M., Wang, H. B., Dembo, M. & Wang, Y. L. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J. 79, 144–152 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Colin-York, H., Eggeling, C. & Fritzsche, M. Dissection of mechanical force in living cells by super-resolved traction force microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 12, 783–796 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hill, H. D. & Mirkin, C. A. The bio-barcode assay for the detection of protein and nucleic acid targets using DTT-induced ligand exchange. Nat. Protoc. 1, 324–336 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Han, S. J., Oak, Y., Groisman, A. & Danuser, G. Traction microscopy to identify force modulation in subresolution adhesions. Nat. Methods 12, 653–656 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Han, S. J., Oak, Y., Groisman, A. & Danuser, G. TFM. GitHub https://github.com/DanuserLab/TFM (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32150016, 21775115, 32071305 and 31871356), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042021kf0030) and Innovation Funds for Postdocs in Hubei Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.L. conceived the project and supervised the research. W.W. and W.C., with the help of P.L., H.L., J.F. and F.S., designed and performed the hydrogel-based mTFM and TFM coupling experiments and analyzed the data. W.W., C.W. and Y.H. designed and performed the T cell and podosome experiments. C.Z. and X.Z. performed single-molecule magnetic tweezer experiments, and K.J. provided intellectual input for the cell knockout experiments. Z.L., W.W. and W.C. wrote the paper with the help of others.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Methods thanks Sanjeevi Sivasankar, Tejeshwar Rao and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Madhura Mukhopadhyay, in collaboration with the Nature Methods team. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Synthesis schemes of molecular tension probes.

a, RSDTPs, b, TGTs and c, Hairpins.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Development of PA hydrogel substrates functionalized with both TFM and mTFM.

a, Immobilization of fluorescent nanobeads on the surfaces of prepared hydrogels for TFM. b, Introduction of lipo-acid groups into hydrogel network. c, Covalent attachment of DNA tension probes to hydrogel surfaces through Au NPs. d, Recipes of PA hydrogels with different stiffness (n = 3 samples) and, e, corresponding results of stiffness characterization using AFM (16 × 16 stiffness map within an 80 µm × 80 µm region of interest). The images are representative of three independent experimental results.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Calibration of RSDTPs attached to handles with different stiffness using magnetic tweezer.

a, Design and sequences of handles with different stiffness. b, Illustration of calibration setup using magnetic tweezer. c, Representative force-displacement calibration curves of 17 pN (left), 45 pN (middle), and 56 pN (right) RSDTPs. d, Distribution of unfolding forces of RSDTPs attached to handles with different stiffness (400 bp, n = 51, 46, 64 events for different RSDTPs. 4000 bp, n = 45, 121, 191 events for different RSDTPs. 13571 nt, n = 39, 45, 30 events for different RSDTPs).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Effects of CytoD on the mechanics of MEFs.

a, Representative timelapse confocal imaging of paxillin-GFP, 17pN-RSDTPs, TFM of cells spreading on 30 kPa PA hydrogel before and after treatment of cytochalasin D (20 μM), and corresponding plots of b, total intensity of mTFM and c, total traction forces measured by TFM (Control, n = 44 cells. CytoD, n = 41 cells). Data represent mean ± s.d. of three experiments. Two-tailed Student t-test is used to assess statistical significance.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 The effect of gel deformation-induced aggregation of DNA tension probes on the validity of reported signals.

a, Representative paxillin-GFP, mTFM and bright field images of cells incubated on 3 kPa PA hydrogel coated with a control RSDTP that was hardly unfolded and normal 50 pN RSDTP, and corresponding quantification of b, spreading area and c, integrin tensions signals (n = 41, 20 cells for each condition). Data represent mean± s.d. of three experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t-test is used to assess statistical significance.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Characterization of the integrin tension distribution of multiple cell lines on soft (3 kPa) and hard (30 kPa) hydrogels.

Representative fluorescent images of paxillin-tagged a, C2C12, d, U2OS, g, U251, j, CHO, and m, HeLa cells on soft and hard hydrogel, and corresponding mTFM, simultaneously reported by mixed 17 pN-RSDTPs and 50 pN-RSDTPs at 37 °C (left), or 55 pN TGTs at room temperature 22 °C (right). The images are representative of three independent experimental results. FA area and the ratio of strongly loaded integrin to total loaded integrins of b, c, C2C12 (n = 25, 28 cells for each stiffness), e, f, U2OS (n = 31, 31 cells for each stiffness), h, i, U251 (n = 25, 34 cells for each stiffness), k, l, CHO (n = 18, 23 cells for each stiffness), and n, o, HeLa cells (n = 13, 28 cells for each stiffness) on soft and hard hydrogel. Data represent mean± s.d. of three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t-test is used to assess statistical significance.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Effect of temperature on mechanical stability of RSDTPs and associated results of hydrogel-based mTFM.

a, Representative fluorescent images of paxillin-tagged MEFs on hydrogels (30 kPa) at 37 °C and room temperature (22 °C), and corresponding mTFM simultaneously reported by mixed 17 pN-RSDTPs and 50 pN-RSDTPs. Total intensity of mTFM per cell reported by b, 17 pN-RSDTPs, c, 50 pN-RSDTPs and d, their ratio (n = 56 cells). Data represent mean± s.d. of three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t-test is used to assess statistical significance. The insensitivity of force ratio to the ambient temperature indicates that even after mechanical stability of RSDTPs was diminished by the increase of temperature from room temperature (22 °C) to 37 °C, the absolute mechanical stability difference between 17 pN RSDTP and 50 pN RSDTP remains significant enough to characterize the distribution of integrin tension.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 The effect of substrate stiffness on integrin tension distribution of Vcl-KO MEF cells.

Representative eGFP-paxillin and tension maps of different RSDTPs of Vcl-KO MEF cells on a, 3 kPa hydrogel, b, 30 kPa hydrogel, imaged using confocal microscope, and c, glass substrates imaged using TIRF. The images are representative of three independent experimental results. d, Western blot results of constructed Vcl-KO MEF cells. The gel images are representative of three independent experimental results.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 The reliability of locking strands in tracing molecular tension.

a. Sequences of 17pN-RSDTPs, paired locking strand, and unpaired locking strands. b, Representative paxillin-GFP and mTFM images of MEF cells plated on PA hydrogel with 17pN-RSDTPs in the absence of locking strands, after the addition of unpaired locking strands, and after addition of paired locking strands and c, corresponding plots of normalized accumulative intensity as a function of time (n = 6, 11, 9 cells for each condition). The images are representative of three independent experimental results. Data represent mean± s.d. of three independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 10 Efficiency of locking strands in memorizing mTFM.

a, Schematic diagram illustrating the flow of experiments. b, Representative Paxillin and mTFM images of MEFs seeded on 3 kPa and 30 kPa hydrogels functionalized with 50 pN RSDTPs before the addition of locking strands (left), after the addition of locking strands (middle), and after the treatment of Cytochalasin D (right), and corresponding c, plots of normalized accumulative intensity as a function of time (n = 6, 7 cells for each stiffness). The images are representative of three independent experimental results. Data represent mean± s.d. of three independent experiments. d, Total intensity of locked mTFM before and after the addition of CytoD and e, their ratios on 3 kPa and 30 kPa hydrogels (n = 6, 7 cells for each stiffness). Data represent mean± s.d. of three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t-test is used to assess statistical significance.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–8.

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Supplementary Video 1

Representative time-lapse confocal imaging of eGFP–paxillin, TFM, mTFM and bright field performed for MEF cells on 30 kPa hydrogels after the treatment of CytoD (20 µM). Images were captured for a duration of 14 min at 15 s intervals.

Supplementary Video 2

Representative time-lapse confocal imaging of eGFP–paxillin, TFM, mTFM and bright field conducted for MEF cells spreading and trypsinized on 30 kPa hydrogels. Images were acquired for a duration of 8 h 50 min at 10 min intervals.

Supplementary Video 3

Representative time-lapse confocal imaging of eGFP–LifeAct, TFM, mTFM and bright field of THP-1 cells on 30 kPa hydrogels. Images were acquired for a duration of 30 min at 30 s intervals.

Supplementary Video 4

Representative time-lapse confocal imaging of bright field and mTFM of naïve T cells seeded on 1 kPa hydrogels before and after the addition of locking strands. Images were acquired for a duration of 22 min at 60 s intervals.

Supplementary Video 5

Representative time-lapse confocal imaging of bright field and mTFM of naïve T cells seeded on 30 kPa hydrogels before and after the addition of locking strands. Images were acquired for a duration of 22 min at 60 s intervals.

Supplementary Data 1

Source data for supplementary figures.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 7

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 8

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 9

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 10

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Chen, W., Wu, C. et al. Hydrogel-based molecular tension fluorescence microscopy for investigating receptor-mediated rigidity sensing. Nat Methods 20, 1780–1789 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-02037-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-02037-0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing