Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Briefing
  • Published:

Evaluating long-read RNA-sequencing analysis tools with in silico mixtures

We conducted a comprehensive long-read RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) benchmarking experiment by combining spike-ins and in silico mixtures to establish a ground-truth dataset. We used long- and short-read RNA-seq technology to deeply sequence samples and compared the performance of a range of analysis tools on these data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of the experimental design.

References

  1. Method of the Year 2022: long-read sequencing. Nat. Methods 20, 1 (2023). An editorial that introduces long-read sequencing technologies as Nature Methods’ Method of the Year 2022.

  2. Foord, C. et al. The variables on RNA molecules: concert or cacophony? Answers in long-read sequencing. Nat. Methods 20, 20–24 (2023). A review that presents the strengths of long-read technologies in solving the complexity of the transcriptome.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hardwick, S. A. et al. Spliced synthetic genes as internal controls in RNA sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods 13, 792–798 (2016). This paper introduces the sequin spike-in standards.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holik, A. Z. et al. RNA-seq mixology: designing realistic control experiments to compare protocols and analysis methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, e30 (2017). This paper reports a short-read RNA-seq benchmarking study using a mixture design.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tian, L. et al. Benchmarking single cell RNA-sequencing analysis pipelines using mixture control experiments. Nat. Methods 16, 479–487 (2019). This paper reports a single-cell RNA-seq benchmarking study that uses a mixture design.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Dong, X. et al. Benchmarking long-read RNA-sequencing analysis tools using in silico mixtures. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-02026-3 (2023).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evaluating long-read RNA-sequencing analysis tools with in silico mixtures. Nat Methods 20, 1643–1644 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-02027-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-02027-2

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing