Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reply to: On powerful GWAS in admixed populations

The Original Article was published on 25 November 2021

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

All data referred to in this reply is available as described in the original Tractor publication4.


  1. 1.

    Popejoy, A. B. & Fullerton, S. M. Genomics is failing on diversity. Nature 538, 161–164 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sirugo, G., Williams, S. M. & Tishkoff, S. A. The missing diversity in human genetic studies. Cell 177, 1080 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Martin, A. R. et al. Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat. Genet. 51, 584–591 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Atkinson, E. G. et al. Tractor uses local ancestry to enable the inclusion of admixed individuals in GWAS and to boost power. Nat. Genet. 53, 195–204 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wang, Y. et al. Theoretical and empirical quantification of the accuracy of polygenic scores in ancestry divergent populations. Nat. Commun. 11, 3865 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bergström, A. et al. Insights into human genetic variation and population history from 929 diverse genomes. Science 367, eaay5012 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    1000 Genomes Project Consortium. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491, 56–65 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Skotte, L., Jørsboe, E., Korneliussen, T. S., Moltke, I. & Albrechtsen, A. Ancestry-specific association mapping in admixed populations. Genet. Epidemiol. 43, 506–521 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Broekema, R. V., Bakker, O. B. & Jonkers, I. H. A practical view of fine-mapping and gene prioritization in the post-genome-wide association era. Open Biol. 10, 190221 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    MacArthur, D. G. et al. Guidelines for investigating causality of sequence variants in human disease. Nature 508, 469–476 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schaid, D. J., Chen, W. & Larson, N. B. From genome-wide associations to candidate causal variants by statistical fine-mapping. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 491–504 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information




E.G.A. drafted the primary text with input from A.B., A.M., B.M.N., C.M.N. and M.J.D. All authors reviewed and approved the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth G. Atkinson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.J.D. is a founder of Maze Therapeutics. B.M.N. is a member of the Deep Genomics Scientific Advisory Board and serves as a consultant for the Camp4 Therapeutics Corporation, Takeda Pharmaceutical and Biogen. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Genetics thanks Loïc Yengo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atkinson, E.G., Bloemendal, A., Maihofer, A.X. et al. Reply to: On powerful GWAS in admixed populations. Nat Genet (2021).

Download citation


Quick links