The promise of technology in the future of dementia care


Dementia is a leading cause of disability, and the prevalence of dementia is steadily increasing. Although people with dementia are living longer lives in the community, without adequate support for their declining physical and psychological needs, the majority of these individuals end up in nursing homes. With no cure in sight, and in the context of population ageing, we must consider how to care for these individuals in the future. Technologies that augment existing care can maintain a person comfortably in their community, maximize individual autonomy and promote social participation. However, to date, such technologies have rarely been used in dementia care. This Perspectives article highlights the need for affordable and appropriate technologies to assist future dementia care, outlines some of the technologies currently available and describes the many challenges to integration of such technologies. Finally, guidelines are suggested for the development and implementation of new technologies in dementia care.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: International dementia statistics over time and projected.


  1. 1.

    Patterson, C. World Alzheimer Report 2018: the state of the art of dementia research: new frontiers. ADI (2018).

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization. Towards a dementia plan: a WHO guide. WHO (2018).

  3. 3.

    United Nations. World population prospects: the 2017 revision. UN (2017).

  4. 4.

    Andrews, E. S. Institutionalising senile dementia in 19th-century Britain. Sociol. Health Illn. 39, 244–257 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Gove, D., Small, N., Downs, M. & Vernooij-Dassen, M. General practitioners’ perceptions of the stigma of dementia and the role of reciprocity. Dementia (London) 16, 948–964 (2017).

  6. 6.

    Weisman De Mamani, A., Weintraub, M. J., Maura, J., Martinez de Andino, A. & Brown, C. A. Stigma, expressed emotion, and quality of life in caregivers of individuals with dementia. Fam. Process 57, 694–706 (2018).

  7. 7.

    Kristanti, M. S., Engels, Y., Effendy, C., Utarini, A. & Vernooij-Dassen, M. Comparison of the lived experiences of family caregivers of patients with dementia and of patients with cancer in Indonesia. Int. Psychogeriatr. 30, 903–914 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Samus, Q. M. et al. Home is where the future is: the BrightFocus Foundation consensus panel on dementia care. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 104–114 (2018).

  9. 9.

    Poey, J. L., Burr, J. A. & Roberts, J. S. Social connectedness, perceived isolation, and dementia: does the social environment moderate the relationship between genetic risk and cognitive well-being? Gerontologist 57, 1031–1040 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Goonawardene, N., Toh, X. P. & Tan, H.-P. in Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications, Services And Contexts Vol. 2 (eds Zhaou, J. & Salvendy, G.) 378–392 (Springer, 2017).

  11. 11.

    Beer, J. M. et al. Older users’ acceptance of an assistive robot: attitudinal changes following brief exposure. Gerontechnology 16, 21–36 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Vandemeulebroucke, T., de Casterle, B. D. & Gastmans, C. How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Aging Ment. Health 22, 149–167 (2018).

  13. 13.

    The RAMCIP Consortium. What is RAMCIP? RAMCIP-project (2018).

  14. 14.

    Gerlowska, J. et al. Assessment of perceived attractiveness, usability, and societal impact of a multimodal robotic assistant for aging patients with memory impairments. Front. Neurol. 9, 392 (2018).

  15. 15.

    The RAMCIP Consortium. RAMCIP at the 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2018). RAMCIP-project (2018).

  16. 16.

    Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. Press release: intelligent robotics. Fraunhofer start-up award 2017 for Mojin Robotics GmbH. Fraunhofer (2018).

  17. 17.

    Feuilherade, P. Robots pick up the challenge of home care needs: growing number of dedicated robots for the care sector to cover multiple tasks for carers and patients. IEC e-tech (2017).

  18. 18.

    Shiomi, M., Lio, T., Kamei, K., Sharma, C. & Hagita, N. Effectiveness of social behaviors for autonomous wheelchair robot to support elderly people in Japan. PLOS ONE 10, e0128031 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Bedaf, S., Gelderblom, G. J. & de Witte, L. Overview and categorization of robots supporting independent living of elderly people: what activities do they support and how far have they developed. Assist. Technol. 27, 88–100 (2015).

  20. 20.

    Pettigrew, S., Talati, Z. & Norman, R. The health benefits of autonomous vehicles: public awareness and receptivity in Australia. Aust. NZ J. Public Health 42, 480–483 (2018).

  21. 21.

    Wong, S. Driverless cars are dodging pedestrians and pheasants in Oxford. New Scientist (2018).

  22. 22.

    Bedaf, S., Marti, P., Amirabollahian, F. & de Witte, L. A multi-perspective evaluation of a service robot for seniors: the voice of different stakeholders. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 13, 592–599 (2018).

  23. 23.

    Mordoch, E., Osterreicher, A., Guse, L., Roger, L. & Thompson, G. Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: a literature review. Mauritas 74, 14–20 (2013).

  24. 24.

    Cleetus, K. J. in Concurrent Engineering: Tools and Technologies for Mechanical System Design (ed. Haug, E. J.) 41–74 (Springer, 1993).

  25. 25.

    Rafinejad, D. in Core Competency, Core Activies, and Leveraging Resources (ed. Rafinejad, D.) 270–273 (J. Ross, 2007).

  26. 26.

    Foloppe, D. A., Richard, P., Yamaguchi, R., Etcharry-Bouyx, F. & Allain, P. The potential of virtual reality-based training to enhance the functional autonomy of Alzhiemer’s disease patients in cooking activities: a single case study. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 28, 709–733 (2018).

  27. 27.

    Lizuka, A. et al. Pilot randomized controlled trial of the GO game intervention on cognitive function. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen. 33, 192–198 (2018).

  28. 28.

    Moyle, W. et al. Use of a robotic seal as a therapeutic tool to improve dementia symptoms: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 18, 766–773 (2017).

  29. 29.

    Jones, C. et al. Does cognitive impairment an agitation in dementia influence intervention effectiveness? Findings from a cluster-randomised controlled trial with the therapeutic robotic, PARO. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 19, 623–626 (2018).

  30. 30.

    Joranson, N. et al. Group activity with PARO in nursing homes: systematic investigation of behaviors in participants. Int. Psychogeriatr. 28, 1345–1354 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Hu, H.-J., Wu, P.-F. & Wang-Chin, T. in Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications, Services And Contexts (eds Zhaou, J. & Salvendy, G.) 42–52 (Springer, 2017).

  32. 32.

    RIKEN-TRI Collaboration Center for Human-Interactive Robot Research (RTC). Concept: world’s first robot that can lift up a human in its arms (RIBA). RTC (2018).

  33. 33.

    de Graaf, M. M. A., Allouch, S. B. & Klamer, T. Sharing a life with Harvey: exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 1–14 (2015).

  34. 34.

    Lee, H. R., Tan, H. & Sabanovic, S. in IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) 312–317 (Columbia Univ. Press, 2016).

  35. 35.

    Pfadenhauer, M. & Dukat, C. Robot caregiver or robot-supported caregiving? The performative development of the social robot PARO in dementia care. Int. J. Soc. Robot 7, 393–406 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Trynacity, K. Close Enough to Care: Replacing Human Caregivers with Robots in Homecare. Thesis, Royal Roads Univ. (2015).

  37. 37.

    Wachsmuth, I. Robots like me: challenges and ethical issues in aged care. Front. Psychol. 9, 432 (2018).

  38. 38.

    Robillard, J. M., Cleland, I., Hoey, J. & Nugent, C. Ethical adoption: a new imperative in the development of technology for dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 1104–1113 (2018).

  39. 39.

    European Commission. Special eurobarometer 427: autonomous systems. (2015).

  40. 40.

    Carretero, S. JRC science and policy reports. Technology-enabled services for older people living at home independently: lessons for public long-term care authorities in the EU Member States. JRC (2015).

  41. 41.

    European Commission. The world’s first culturally sensitive robots for elderly care. CORDIS (updated 12 Dec 2018).

  42. 42.

    European Commission. Living with dementia, feeling lonely and isolated? MARIO the robot can help. CORDIS (updated 11 May 2018).

  43. 43.

    Coeckelbergh, M. Artificial agents, good care, and modernity. Theor. Med. Bioeth. 36, 265–277 (2015).

  44. 44.

    Matthias, A. Robot lies in health care: when is deception morally permissible? Kennedy Inst. Ethics J. 25, 169–192 (2015).

  45. 45.

    Metzler, T. A. & Barnes, S. J. Three dialogues concerning robots in elder care. Nurs. Philos. 15, 4–13 (2014).

  46. 46.

    Holly, R. Stephen Hawking gets a tech upgrade from Intel, but keeps his original voice. (2014).

  47. 47.

    Burch, J. In Japan, a Buddhist funeral service for robot dogs. National Geographic (2018).

  48. 48.

    Santos Rutschman, A. Faster approval for drugs and medical devices under the 21st Century Cures Act raises concerns for patient safety. The Conversation (2017).

  49. 49.

    Van Norman, G. A. Drugs, devices, and the FDA: part 2: an overview of approval processes: FDA approval of medical devices. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 1, 277–287 (2016).

  50. 50.

    Shaw, J., Shaw, S., Wherton, J., Hughes, G. & Greenhalgh, T. Studying scale-up and spread as social practice: theoretical introduction an empirical case study. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, e244 (2017).

  51. 51.

    Bowman Rogers, M. Technology for patients: purring robots, digital data-gathering. ALZFORUM (2018).

  52. 52.

    Australian Government Department of Health. About the home care packages program. (updated 21 Apr 2017).

  53. 53.

    Schwenk, M. et al. Sensor-derived physical activity parameters can predict future falls in people with dementia. Gerontology 61, 483–492 (2014).

  54. 54.

    Ferri, C. P. et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 366, 2112–2117 (2005).

  55. 55.

    Prince, M. & Jackson, J. World Alzheimer Report 2009. ADI (2009).

  56. 56.

    Prince, M. et al. World Alzheimer Report 2015: the global impact of dementia. an analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. ADI (2015).

  57. 57.

    Prince, M. Guerchet, M. & Prina, M. The epidemiology and impact of dementia: current state and future trends. WHO (2015).

  58. 58.

    Neubauer, N. A. et al. What do we know about technologies for dementia-related wandering? A scoping review. Can. J. Occup. Ther. 85, 196–208 (2018).

  59. 59.

    Gaugler, J. E. et al. Six-month effectiveness of remote activity monitoring for persons living with dementia and their family caregivers: an experimental mixed methods study. Gerontologist 59, 78–89 (2019).

  60. 60.

    Bemelmans, R., Gelderblom, G., Jonker, P. & de Witte, L. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 13, 114–120 (2012).

  61. 61.

    Kouroupetroglou, C. et al. Interacting with dementia: the MARIO approach. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 242, 38–47 (2017).

  62. 62.

    Whelan, S. et al. Investigating the effect of social robot embodiment. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 242, 523–526 (2017).

  63. 63.

    Moyle, W. et al. Connecting the person with dementia and family: a feasiblity study of a telepresence robot. BMC Geriatr. 14, 7 (2014).

  64. 64.

    Liang, A. et al. A pilot randomized trial of a companion robot for people with dementia living in the community. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 18, 871–878 (2017).

  65. 65.

    Brown, E. et al. Technologies for dementia care: opportunities, challenges, and current practices. J. Appl. Gerontol. 38, 73–91 (2019).

  66. 66.

    Hill, N. T. et al. Computerized cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Psych. 174, 329–340 (2016).

  67. 67.

    Lee, G. J. et al. A comparison of the effects between 2 computerized cognitive training programs, Bettercog and COMCOG, on elderly patients with MCI and mild dementia: a single-blind randomized controlled study. Medicine (Baltimore) 97, e13007 (2018).

  68. 68.

    Stillwell, S. B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M. & Williamson, K. M. Evidence-based practice, step by step: searching for the evidence. Am. J. Nurs. 110, 41–47 (2010).

Download references


The author thanks J. Murfield and L. Earle for their help with preparation and referencing of this article.

Reviewer information

Nature Reviews Neurology thanks K. Rejdak, T. Shibata, A. S. Rigaud and L. Robinson for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy Moyle.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Alzheimer Master:

Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration:



The Talking Photo Album (CommunicATe):

Dawn Clocks:

European Commission:



Google Home:

Wireless movement sensors (Just Checking):




Obi Robotic Spoon:


RAMCIP (Robotic Assistant for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) Patients at home):

Riken and Robear:

Find Me Tunstall Watch:


Artificial intelligence

(AI). An area of computer science that emphasizes the creation of machines that function and respond similarly to humans. Computerized AI systems have been designed for speech recognition, machine learning, planning and problem-solving.

Internet of Things

(IoT). The interconnection of computing devices embedded in everyday objects, which enables them to send and receive data over the Internet.

Social baggage

A metaphor that represents our experiences and memories that we bring with us from our past.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moyle, W. The promise of technology in the future of dementia care. Nat Rev Neurol 15, 353–359 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading