Haemodialyser technology has not advanced much in decades, despite its unresolved shortcomings. Sophisticated new computational tools such as high-fidelity surrogate in silico dialyser models could reduce the time and expense of exploring alternative designs, dialysis dose and operating conditions compared with the current gold standard in vitro studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Ronco, C. & Clark, W. R. Haemodialysis membranes. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 14, 394–410 (2018).
Ramada, D. L. et al. Portable, wearable and implantable artificial kidney systems: needs, opportunities and challenges. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 19, 481–490 (2023).
Cancilla, N. et al. A porous media CFD model for the simulation of hemodialysis in hollow fiber membrane modules. J. Membr. Sci. 646, 120219 (2022).
Abaci, H. E. & Altinkaya, S. A. Modeling of hemodialysis operation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38, 3347–3362 (2010).
Mohajerani, F., Clark, W. R., Ronco, C. & Narsimhan, V. Mass transport in high-flux hemodialysis: application of engineering principles to clinical prescription. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17, 749–756 (2022).
King, J. et al. Modeling indoxyl sulfate transport in a bioartificial kidney: two-step binding kinetics or lumped parameters model for uremic toxin clearance? Comput. Biol. Med. 138, 104912 (2021).
Refoyo, R., Skouras, E. D., Chevtchik, N. V., Stamatialis, D. & Burganos, V. N. Transport and reaction phenomena in multilayer membranes functioning as bioartificial kidney devices. J. Membr. Sci. 565, 61–71 (2018).
Karniadakis, G. E. et al. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422–440 (2021).
Alber, M. et al. Integrating machine learning and multiscale modeling—perspectives, challenges, and opportunities in the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences. NPJ Digit. Med. 2, 115 (2019).
Himmelfarb, J., Vanholder, R., Mehrotra, R. & Tonelli, M. The current and future landscape of dialysis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 16, 573–585 (2020).
Acknowledgements
A.E.S. thanks Danesh Tafti (Virginia Tech) and Steven Brunton (University of Washington) for insightful feedback on parts of the article before submission. R.S. is supported by the Regenerative Medicine Interdisciplinary Graduate Education Program at Virginia Tech. A.E.S. is supported by the US National Science Foundation under award number 2014181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sinha, R., Rocco, M.V., Daeihagh, P. et al. Innovating dialysis through computational modelling of hollow-fibre haemodialysers. Nat Rev Nephrol 20, 269–270 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-024-00826-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-024-00826-0