Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Digital determinants of health: opportunities and risks amidst health inequities

Digital transformation offers unprecedented opportunities for advancing healthcare, but also raises complex ethical and legal challenges. Emerging drivers of health disparity termed ‘digital determinants of health’ call for purposeful, equity-focused strategies to ensure that technological innovation benefits all without exacerbating disparities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Kickbusch, I. et al. The Lancet and Financial Times Commission on governing health futures 2030: growing up in a digital world. Lancet 398, 1727–1776 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Braveman, P. & Gottlieb, L. The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 129 (Suppl. 2), 19–31 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallifant, J., Nakayama, L. F., Gichoya, J. W., Pierce, R. & Celi, L. A. Equity should be fundamental to the emergence of innovation. PLOS Digit. Health 2, e0000224 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Celi, L. A. et al. Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities — a global review. PLOS Digit. Health 1, e0000022 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Feinstein, J. S. The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: a review of the literature. Milbank Q. 71, 279–322 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yarnell, C. J. et al. Do thresholds for invasive ventilation in hypoxemic respiratory failure exist? A cohort study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 207, 271–282 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Charpignon, M.-L. et al. Critical bias in critical care devices. Crit. Care Clin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2023.02.005 (2023).

  8. Pierce, R., Sterckx, S. & Van Biesen, W. A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma: how semantic black boxes and opaque artificial intelligence confuse medical decision‐making. Bioethics 36, 113–120 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pierce, R. In Bioethics and Racism (eds Botrugno, C. et al.) 57–82 (De Gruyter, 2023).

  10. Pierce, R. L. Interrupting pathways to health inequities in citizen science health research. Health Promot. Int. 37 (Suppl. 2), ii21–ii34 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jack Gallifant or Leo Anthony Celi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallifant, J., Celi, L.A. & Pierce, R.L. Digital determinants of health: opportunities and risks amidst health inequities. Nat Rev Nephrol 19, 749–750 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-023-00763-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-023-00763-4

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing