Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Sexism in academia is bad for science and a waste of public funding

Nature Reviews Materials volume 9, pages 1–3 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Higher education and research institutions are critical to the well-being and success of societies, meaning their financial support is strongly in the public interest. At the same time, value-for-money principles demand that such investment delivers. Unfortunately, these principles are currently violated by one of the biggest sources of public funding inefficiency: sexism.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The gradual attrition of women from the academic career path.

References

  1. Boivin, N., Täuber, S. & Keller, U. Nobel win: spotlight on the attrition of women in science. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03459-8 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Spoon, K. et al. Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty. Sci Adv. 9, eadi2205 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. She Figures 2021: Tracking Progress on the Path Towards Gender Equality in Research and Innovation (European Commission, 2021).

  4. Bourabain, D. Everyday sexism and racism in the ivory tower: the experiences of early career researchers on the intersection of gender and ethnicity in the academic workplace. Gender Work Organ. 28, 248–267 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Casad, B. J. et al. Gender inequality in academia: problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. J. Neurosci. Res. 99, 13–23 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (National Academies Press, 2018).

  7. Täuber, S., Loyens, K., Oertelt-Prigione, S. & Kubbe, I. Harassment as a consequence and cause of inequality in academia: a narrative review. EClinicalMedicine 49, 101486 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Connor, P. Why is it so difficult to reduce gender inequality in male-dominated higher educational organizations? A feminist institutional perspective. Interdiscipl. Sci. Rev. 45, 207–228 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Higher Education Authority. Report of the Expert Group: HEA National Review of Gender Equality in Irish Higher Educational Institutions (Higher Education Authority, 2016).

  10. Greider, C. W. et al. Increasing gender diversity in the STEM research workforce. Science 366, 692–695 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Social Safety in Dutch Academia. From Paper to Practice (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2022).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany

    Nicole Boivin

  2. School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Nicole Boivin

  3. Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Susanne Täuber

  4. Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Susanne Täuber

  5. Hamburg, Germany

    Ulrike Beisiegel

  6. Institute for Quantum Electronics, Physics Department, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Ursula Keller

  7. Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Dubendorf, Switzerland

    Janet G. Hering

Authors
  1. Nicole Boivin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susanne Täuber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ulrike Beisiegel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ursula Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Janet G. Hering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Boivin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boivin, N., Täuber, S., Beisiegel, U. et al. Sexism in academia is bad for science and a waste of public funding. Nat Rev Mater 9, 1–3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-023-00624-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-023-00624-3

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing